Pharmaceuticals and Politicians collude to ban natural health means

Dr. Rima and Counsel Ralph interview Australian attorney Graeme Little on the state of health freedom down under. Counsel Little exposes the conspiracy among pharma operatives and politicians to ban natural means to health.

Huge week in Perth last weekend for two seminars by Judy Wilyman and Wendy Lyell and then headed by 8 hour train to Kalgoorlie to stay two nights with the family coping with an adult vaccination horror movie, Ben Hammond, who suffered paralysis and permanent disabilities from the DTap vaccine.

Unreal nightmare for wife Tanya and five children – awesome support for Ben. Tonight’s Facebook Live was a difficult decision to make but I felt in light of Minister Hennessy’s audacious front page story in the Herald Sun slamming anti-vaxxers – I had to be bold and brave.

Thanks to all those donations in the last two weeks – would never have got to Perth.

Cupboard is bare now but I don’t need much to survive these days.

Would like to head to Canberra next week to interview NHMRC officials – getting massive silent treatment to endless questions I have asked over the last two months. Trust me – I am staggered with the Australian Immunisation Handbook evidence..

GoFundMe link:

Katter and Sharkie get bull from PM over Kidman in Question Time

20 October 2016:

Bob-Katter-006KAP Member for Kennedy Bob Katter condemned the Prime Minister’s and Treasurer’s answers in Question Time today in relation to S Kidman & Co as “a load of bull-dust.

Mr Katter said the Question asked by NXT Member for Mayo, Rebekha Sharkie about the Kidman sale was, “clear and straight forward, but the Prime Minister gave a waffling non-answer handballing it to Treasurer Morrison for more waffle.

Rebekha Sharkie’s question whether the PM agreed that the 100 per cent Aussie bid for Kidman should receive preference over any equivalent bid involving foreign interests – should have received an unambiguous answer from the PM.

Instead the PM and the Treasurer wouldn’t even say that a local bid should get preferential treatment — especially given there would be more jobs and the money staying in Australia.

Today Mr Katter teamed up with Senator Nick Xenophon and Rebekah Sharkie MP to throw political support behind the all Australian bid for the Kidman cattle empire.

Trump Video – The Clintons Are Criminals !!!

National Party sells out farmers yet again on backpacker tax

Backpacker Tax changes: gagged & goaded but no victory

18 October 2016:


Bob Katter

KAP Member for Kennedy, Bob Katter voted against the Backpacker Tax changes in the lower house today.

The proposed changes, implementing a 19.5 % instead of the originally touted 32.5% were eventually passed. Mr Katter is hardly surprised that the National Party has sold out on non-city Australia again.

Mr Katter spoke passionately against the supposed “reduction” that is being lauded as a victory by the LNP when in fact the Backpacker will still be paying significantly more.

Mr Katter said, “I was one of the few Representatives of a regional and tourism seat that got to speak on the Backpacker tax before the Government gaged debate, denying others to have their say.

We do not have any illusions that we are applying a tax of 30 per cent. It was a little bit over 30 per cent before, so there really has not been much change at all.

“We are going around clapping our hands and saying, ‘How wonderful!’

“You will not have a tourism industry if you take away the backpackers. One quarter of the Far North Queensland tourism industry is in fact the backpackers—and you have taken away their incentive to come here. Their wages, their incomes, have been cut by a third, and you are saying that will have no effect. Of course it will have an effect.”

Wikileaks – Hillary Clinton’s emails the world needs to read


Worse than Treason

WikiLeaks released documents explaining why U.S. AIRCRAFT were never sent to rescue the USA embassy and Ambassador Stevens under attack in Benghazi. President Obama and Hillary Clinton had a secret reason to order a stand down of the rescue troops.

July 25th, 2012 a Chinook helicopter was taken down by one of the US own Stinger Missiles, but the idiot Taliban didn’t arm the missile and the Chinook didn’t explode, but was forced to land anyway from impact damage. An ordnance team recovered the serial number off the missile which led back to a cache of Stingers being kept in Qatar by the CIA.

At 9:40 PM, September 11, 2012, members of Ansar al-Sharia attacked the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi resulting in the deaths of U.S Ambassador to Libya John Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith. At around 4:00 AM on September 12, the group launched a mortar attack against a CIA annex approximately one mile away, killing CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty and wounding ten others.

Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode and sent Ambassador John Christopher “Chris” Stevens to Benghazi post haste in order to retrieve US made Stinger missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional oversight or permission. Hillary Clinton brokered the deal through Stevens and a private arms dealer named Marc Turi. Some of the shoulder fired missiles ended up in Afghanistan being used against American’s own military. This was a “do-or-die” mission, which explains the stand down orders given to multiple commando teams.

It was the State Dept, not the CIA that supplied them to the USA sworn enemies, because David Howell Petraeus, director of the Central Intelligence Agency wouldn’t supply these deadly weapons due to their potential use on commercial aircraft. Then, Obama threw David Petraeus under the bus after he refused to testify that he confirmed their Bullshit smokescreen quoting points about a spontaneous uprising due to some YouTube video.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton committed treason. THIS is what the investigation is all about, why she had a private computer server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and why Obama, two weeks after the Benghazi attack, told the United Nation, sticking to the smokescreen YouTube video, knowing full well it was all lies.

Further- the Taliban knew that this administration aided and abetted the enemy without Congressional approval when Congressman John Andrew Boehner created the Select Committee, and the Taliban began pushing the Obama Administration for release of five Taliban Generals.

Just days after U.S. Army Private First Class Bowe Bergdahl went missing from his base in Afghanistan in 2009, the men in his platoon were ordered to sign papers vowing to never discuss what he did or their efforts to track him down. Bergdahl was just a pawn and a traitor. President Obama is not only corrupt but compromised, Hillary Clinton exposed as a serial liar, perjuring herself multiple times at the hearings.

This would explain why no US military aircraft were NOT called in – the administration knew their enemies had US made Stinger Missiles.

America now may have not only it’s first woman president but the package contains an habitual liar running their country with her finger on the button.

Your vote can stop this before you won’t have a USA.

Visit Wikileaks Hillary Clinton database of emails – [Click Here]

More Hillary Lies and Corruption

Click pic to search Wikileaks database

From the desk of Julian Assange

WikiLeaks begins its series on deals involving Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff from 1998 until 2001. Mr Podesta also controls the Podesta Group, a major lobbying firm and is the Chair of the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Washington DC-based think tank. Part 1 of the Podesta Emails comprises 2,060 emails and 170 attachments and focuses on Mr Podesta’s communications relating to nuclear energy, and media handling over donations to the Clinton Foundation from mining and nuclear interests; 1,244 of the emails reference nuclear energy. The full collection includes emails to and from Hillary Clinton.

In April 2015 the New York Times published a story about a company called “Uranium One” which was sold to Russian government-controlled interests, giving Russia effective control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for the production of nuclear weapons, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of US government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off the deal was the State Department, then headed by Secretary Clinton. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) comprises, among others, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy.

As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.

When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment’s review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as “baseless”.

Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).

In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: “Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): “John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign”.

Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that “Jose Fernandez has personally attested that ‘Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter’,” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.

The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: “Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I’m finding extremely rewarding.”

Julian Assange

julian assange2


John Howard admits demonising Pauline Hanson was a BIG mistake!!

By Belinda Cleary

‘Don’t marginalise Pauline Hanson or her supporters’: Former PM John Howard warns politicians One Nation supporters are ‘not racists or bigots’

  • John Howard says demonising Pauline Hanson 20 years a go was a mistake
  • He has warned Parliament not to do it again – following her maiden speech
  • Ms Hanson said Australia is in danger of being swamped by Muslims
  • Her maiden speech during the Howard years warned of Asian immigrants

Former prime minister John Howard has warned it would be wrong to repeat the mistake of 20 years ago and try to marginalise Pauline Hanson and her supporters.

Senator Hanson caused a stir on Wednesday night with her first speech declaring Australia is in danger of being swamped with Muslims – 20 years after making the same warning about Asians.

Mr Howard told ABC TV, Senator Hanson was entitled to be treated in a respectful fashion by the rest of parliament.


In relation to Pauline Hanson, the mistake that was made 20 years ago of trying to demonise her and demonise her supporters should not be repeated,’ Mr Howard said.

He argued that people who voted for Senator Hanson were not racists or bigots and did not vote for her because of their views on immigration.

‘They voted for her because they’re unhappy with the mainstream political parties,’ Mr Howard said.

A form of disillusionment or protest vote, yes.’

It reflected poorly on the Greens that they walked out early, he said.

Special Minister of State Scott Ryan said he profoundly disagreed with Senator Hanson’s call to end immigration.

‘I’m a strong supporter of our non-discriminatory immigration policy, it’s incredibly successful and serves Australia well,’ he told ABC Radio.

Greens leader Richard Di Natale defended his party’s walkout during Senator Hanson’s ‘vulgar speech’.

‘We wouldn’t dignify it by staying in there,’ he told Sky New

Labor frontbencher Tony Burke says the silliest argument anyone could make about Senator Hanson was to claim she was stupid.

‘She is smart, she is strategic, she is calculating,’ he said.

‘Pauline Hanson wanted the exact conversation across Australia that we’re having now, that the media is running.’

Crooks and Nannies

Letter to the Editor

lawThe Separation of Church and State is fundamental to peace order and good government and is guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and Ch III The Constitution, but a small minority, the Legal Profession who have as probably their most important clients, the Big Banks, with almost a quarter of the members in both houses of this Parliament scattered equally between the Liberals and Labor have compelled us to be members of a de-facto Church of Australia by compelling us to vote mostly for one or the other. With preferential voting one or the other ends up with our vote eventually. We have no lawyers admitted to practice representing the people in this House in the Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party.

For 498 years the English banned lawyers altogether from sitting in the House of Commons. It worked for them, because the King could appoint leading lawyers to the House of Lords, as Life Peers, to keep the bastards in the House of Commons honest. In 1872, after 498 years they let lawyers back into the House of Commons. From 1374 to 1872 not one lawyer sat in the House of Commons. They kept the born to rule attitude out of the House of Commons. But here in Australia both Labor and the Liberals have many career politicians who were lawyers before coming here. Not one of them picked up on the problems with the High Court. At the very top the Australian system was flawed. It is flawed right down to the suburban solicitor, and local Magistrate who almost every day tells someone before them to get a lawyer.

PoliticianIt is almost as if Lawyers have formed an alternate Compulsory Church or Cartel for want of a better name, The Church of Satan and the Latter day Demons. It writes its own Rule Book just like the Muslims do. Comply or do not come to our Court. It has Judges in Court both with capital Letters, and yet Justice McKerracher in Perth, either never did punctuation in school, or like the High Court did not issue process in the name of the Queen, does not understand the significance of a Capital Letter and one that has no capitals. In the Australian Constitution the words ‘court’ and “courts” appear twice without Capitals. The word “judges” appears twice, and this is supposed to guarantee the Separation of Powers, the power to judge from the Power to Administer a judgment. Merging the two in a Judge makes the separation of powers a joke. These houses, in S 2 Judiciary Act 1903 defines Appeal as any proceeding to call in question the proceedings, jurisdiction or decision of a Judge Capitalised or Court capitalised as an Appeal. We must ask Judge McKerracher what he does not understand by that Section. It looks like black and white law to me.

There is an Australian Style Manual published by the Commonwealth available from the Tables Office here. Perhaps it should be the basis of a Recall by Universities of every Student since 1973, for a new update on the Australian Constitution, for six months, so they can read and understand English as she is written in Australia. It clearly differentiated between a word with a Capital letter and one without. Because they have not really understood English when they graduated, none of the lawyers in this place in the last twelve years picked up on the contempt held for this place by the High Court for 12 years. Perhaps every Member and Senator should get and read a copy of the Style Manual.

Because they have not done so, the Australian Banks have made a profit of over 45 billion dollars in the past 12 months, and mocked the people of Australia in this place last week, while the Government has a deficit of around 38 billion dollars, entirely because the lawyers serving these Banks cannot read and write properly. The fraud industry relies absolutely on ignorance. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. I have evidence that 35 Billion dollars of Home Loans in Australia were reclassified as Investment Loans, so they could be called up to strip the assets of people who could not meet the much shorter time frames of Investment Loans compared to Homer Loans, which when called out by an unrepresented individual, at great cost, were switched back to Home Loans again. We have the black and white forgeries done by Bank Managers do do this, and how the Law Firms sacked lawyers who admitted this had been done.

Every day someone in distress comes to my Office. Many are contemplating suicide, because they see no hope. 27 a week successfully suicide, and we at Pauline Hanson’s One Nation want to give them back hope, and trust. Trust that what comes out of here means something. Hope that the words of the English Language mean something. Hope that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Published as Schedule 2 to the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986, will govern the Next set of Rules of Court in every court both State and Federal in every nook and cranny in Australia, or should I say in every Crook and Nanny. The Nanny State relies on lawyers and Crooks as Judges. Many lawyers from here have gone on to be High Court Judges. Barwick from the Liberals and Murphy from Labor come to mind.

We at Pauline Hanson;s One Nation stand for reform. God knows we need it. By asking the hard questions, and restoring the Separation of Powers to give every Religion a fair go, we want to make this wonderful country a land of hope and glory where fairness and honesty reign Supreme in every “court” without exception. The Queen represents Honesty and Integrity, In Victoria and my home State Judges no longer swear allegiance to Her. Some Judges have resigned in protest, but many absolutely dependent for their salaries on the State like McKerracher J, have stayed on, rendering service not to the Queen but some foreign unknown God invented by the United Nations. This why I called out the High Court. We cannot sit here owing Allegiance to a Foreign Power, so why should they be allowed to do so.

Peter Gargan ~ Perth


No fresh milk by 2028? New bill for fair price to farmers


A new logo would be put on milk bottles to help consumers identify if it is sourced from a farmer who was paid a fair price, under proposed laws by Katter’s Australian Party.

Shane Knuth said the bill, which will need the support of one of the major parties and crossbenchers, establishes the eligibility criteria and legal protection for the voluntary system.

“Queensland dairy farmers are in a crippling financial crisis,” he said.

“The deterioration climate of the dairy industry is making it crucial to pass legislation that will help keep dairy farmers afloat.

“The fair milk price logo informs consumers where the milk is produced, that farmers were paid a sustainable price for the cost of a litre of milk, and that it’s Queensland’s fresh milk.”

‘No fresh milk by 2028’

Mr Knuth said an average of 50 farmers left the industry each year, going from 1500 to just 430 in 15 years.

If the trend continued there would be no fresh milk produced in the state by 2028, he said.

“Deregulation, natural disasters, and the dollar-a-litre supermarket price wars and unsustainable farm gate prices have slashed the number of Queensland dairy farmers.”

The bill now goes to the Agriculture and Environment Committee for consideration before it is debated by the Parliament.

It is unclear if the KAP bill would be passed, with the government and opposition coy on their intentions.

A government spokesman said Minister Leanne Donaldson would assess the merits of the bill after it was considered by a parliamentary committee.

Opposition’s agriculture spokesman Dale Last said the LNP had a strong record of supporting Queensland farmers.

“We’ll be keen to take a closer look at this legislation as it’s considered by the Parliamentary Committee,” he said.

-ABC –

The real China outside our Kowtowing duopoly parliament

Canberra dictatorial duopoly puppets capitulating to China’s cashing up silent invasion via a Trojan Horse, are remote controlling Australia  from behind a facade of glossy assimilation.

BE PREPARED, new owners in waiting will  remove the tiny residue of freedom we have left.

 Duopoly faithful lemmings  sustain promoted mountainous fear driven legislation, set in place by self appointed political masters agenda to maintain total control  by deception, and so glaringly obvious to a far greater master targeting the defenseless.

Harry Palmer

Extreme torture inside China’s correctional facilities

WARNING: Disturbing content.

JINTAO Liu’s body shuddered in pain as he endured yet another day of extreme torture.

He had woken to pins being pushed into his nails before he was forced to stand still in a yard for some 18 hours. If he moved, he was beaten viciously and within an inch of his life.

Each excruciating second of the gruelling punishment caused his legs to swell as his body threatened to buckle under the pressure. He was given “no toilet breaks”, and shown no mercy. Time had become his enemy — but not his worst.

That was a typical day for Mr Liu during a lengthy stint in a series of Beijing detention centres and labour camps between 2006 and 2009.

There, he was subjected to electric shocks, medical tests, forced feedings, beatings, violent sexual assaults and other barbaric forms of torture designed by prison guards to humiliate and inflict maximum pain.

But it was one particularly savage punishment that etched the deepest psychological scar on Mr Liu.

“The incident which marked me the most was when they, four of (the prison guards), stripped me of my clothes, and used the toilet brush to pierce my anus, saying that they would pierce until I turned homosexual,” Mr Liu told

“They pulled my pubic hairs and played with my genitals.”

His only ‘crime’ was to practice Falun Gong, a spiritual meditation based on the guiding principles of “truth, compassion and tolerance”.

But perhaps just as shocking is that the Chinese government has been carrying out these human rights atrocities — including forced organ removal for harvesting purposes — on innocent citizens and convicted criminals for the best part of the past two decades. And it’s still happening today.

A woman protests in Hyde Park to end the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners in China. Picture: Sam Mooy


Mr Liu, 36, is one of thousands of people who have been incarcerated in some of China’s worst jails, labour camps and detention centres for practising Falun Gong and refusing to give up their spiritual beliefs.

By the 1990s Falun Gong had become so popular it was estimated to have 100 million members, outnumbering the country’s ruling Communist Party and prompting former Chinese leader Jiang Zemin to ban the practice in 1999.

Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting (DAFOH) Australia spokeswoman Sophia Bryskine said the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners was still extensive with many being locked up “with no legal proceedings”.

“In our recent research and communications we have focused predominantly on prisoners of conscience as the scale of abuse remains vast,” she told

Dr Bryskine said China was committing human rights atrocities on a mass, state-sanctioned level and that Australia, along with the other nations, needed to immediately act and condemn it.

Read the rest of this entry

First Bligh now Palaszczuk selling off your assets

Tim Nicholls Opposition Leader

Tim Nicholls Opposition Leader

The Opposition has compared the Palaszczuk Government to former premier Anna Bligh’s “failed” administration during a heated debate over asset sales.

Question time was dominated by asset sales, after Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk last week announced the State Government would sell off publicly owned land to encourage urban renewal in cities across Queensland.

But Opposition Leader Tim Nicholls claimed the policy was a broken promise from Labor and he tried to draw the link between Ms Palaszczuk and Ms Bligh – who led the state between 2007 and 2012.

“Before 2009 election campaign Anna Bligh and Andrew Fraser deceived Queenslanders and promised not to sell state assets and then did so,” he said.
“Before the 2015 campaign, the Premier and Treasurer promised not to sell assets and are now planning on doing so.” “How is the Premier’s Government any different from the failed Bligh-Fraser Government?” Ms Bligh ruled out considering privatisations before the 2009 election and after Labor was re-elected the Government moved to sell Queensland Rail’s freight business – now called Aurizon after listing on the stock exchange – along with the state’s forestry assets, putting Queensland Motorways out on a long-term lease and offloading the Brisbane and Abbot Point ports.

Queenslanders registered their displeasure about selling state assets at the ballot box, with the Bligh Government decimated at the 2012 election – reduced to just seven MPs out of the 89-seat parliament.

But Ms Palaszczuk rejected the claim and pointed out that the former LNP Government took a $37 billion privatisation package to the last election.

“The person who is now the leader of the Opposition was the architect of the plan to sell off $37 billion worth of assets,” she said.

“We have heard rumours that they are talking about either a 50-year lease on our energy companies or our ports, or perhaps selling a 50 per cent stake in them.” Ms Palaszczuk defended the land sales policy because it would create jobs for Queenslanders by partnering with the private sector and local councils to deliver urban renewal projects.

But Mr Nicholls said Ms Palaszczuk had changed the rules about what constitutes a privatisation in a move to justify the land sales policy.

“The Premier has repeatedly tried to claim her Government would not sell assets, even attempting to change the definition to income-producing assets after the election,” he said.

A Government spokesman said Labor’s pre-election policy was to not sell “income-producing assets”.

Source: Courier Mail

%d bloggers like this: