Arrogant TGA head Dr John Skerritt ducks for cover as Roberts accuses him of vaccine impropriety

Federal Police should be investigating Professor John Skerrit’s onshore and offshore bank accounts. Former PM Scott Morrison accrued $52 Million while PM. How much has Bro John salted away? (

Again Senator Malcolm Roberts clearly shows he is just about the only senator worth his taxpayer remuneration.

Senator ROBERTS: Can you tell me how many medicines were approved under the provisional approval pathway during the COVID period 1 July 2020 to date? My numbers are 13 vaccines and six drugs; is that correct?

Dr Skerritt: Are you talking specifically about COVID treatments and COVID vaccines?

Senator ROBERTS: No, any vaccines or drugs that have been approved using the provisional pathway.

Dr Skerritt: I will start with COVID vaccine treatments. There have been seven COVID vaccines and eight COVID treatments. I’ll just check whether I’ve got the numbers for other medicines during that period. You’re talking about the provisional approval pathway?

Senator ROBERTS: Yes.

Dr Skerritt: From 1 July this year there have been five provisional approvals. From the period 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022 there have been 23. That would include those COVID treatments. What it does show is a lot of other medicines, such as cancer medicines, such as medicines for rare conditions, have also been approved. In the financial year 2021, from 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022, there were five. Over the period you’re talking about, that would add up to 33.

Therapeutic Goods Authority chief Professor John Skerritt under fire for allowing Pfizer’s toxic clot shot to kill and maim kids and adults

Senator ROBERTS: How many drugs have been approved under the normal process during that same period?

Dr Skerritt: During the same period? I will add the three financial years and I’ll check my mental arithmetic. So 36 this current financial year, and 117. These are either new approvals or new indications approved. And 95 the year before. So, it is a significant percentage, but not most of them.

Senator ROBERTS: Is the maximum provisional approval period six years because it can take that long to get drugs approved under the old approval system?

Dr Skerritt: A provisional approval is only valid for two years and then the company either has to come back and show why they cannot obtain all the data within the period and apply for an extension.

Senator ROBERTS: No, the maximum provisional approval?

Dr Skerritt: They can apply for further lots of two years.

Senator ROBERTS: Is the maximum provisional approval—

Dr Skerritt: Overall the maximum period is six years, but it’s not six years off the bat.

Senator ROBERTS: It’s two years with extensions.

Dr Skerritt: They are possible extensions; they’re not guaranteed.

Senator ROBERTS: How much money do you save pharmaceutical companies by switching from full approval to express approval? I understand it’s hundreds of millions per approval?

Dr Skerritt: It actually costs the pharmaceutical companies more in regulatory fees for provisional approval.

Senator ROBERTS: No, I didn’t say regulatory fees. How much are you saving the pharmaceutical companies by giving them express or provisional approval rather than going through the six-year period for getting proper approval?

Dr Skerritt: No, you’ve misinterpreted the system. It’s not a six-year period to get full regulatory approval.

Senator ROBERTS: It varies. I accept that.

Dr Skerritt: Most of our approvals are submitted as a standard approval, especially, for example, if it wasn’t a public health emergency or it’s a drug that already has others in the same category. They’re submitted as a standard approval.

Senator ROBERTS: Dedicated trials for their drugs, I understand, can be hundreds of millions of dollars. How much time and money would they save by going express?

Dr Skerritt: We would not give a provisional approval to a medicine unless there were clinical trials.

Senator ROBERTS: How much money does it save if they do a provisional without doing a formal or normal approval process? How much money does it save the drug company?

Dr Skerritt: I don’t believe there are necessarily savings. The situation would be different for every drug. It’s really important to emphasise there were very extensive clinical trials for the vaccines and treatments that have been through provisional approval.

Senator ROBERTS: My understanding is that it can cost hundreds of millions of dollars to get the full approval process. Without the dedicated trial, they could save hundreds of millions of dollars per drug?

Dr Skerritt: I don’t necessarily agree with you.

Senator ROBERTS: When does the provisional approval for Pfizer expire?

Dr Skerritt: The two-year period will be two years from the anniversary of the first approval. I would emphasise that in certain countries—

Senator ROBERTS: What is that date?

Dr Skerritt: The products are now fully approved.

Senator ROBERTS: What is the date of provisional approval expiry?

Dr Skerritt: For the very first approval, for 16 years and over, the two-year period finishes on 25 January 2023.

Senator ROBERTS: I have in front of me a document called the Australian Public Assessment Report for Tozinameran, from Comirnaty (Pfizer), dated December 2021. Is this the approval application for the paediatric version of the Pfizer vaccine?

Dr Skerritt: No, it is not. An Australian Public Assessment Report is a summary of the assessment that we did of the application. You mentioned Pfizer. The actual application is over 220,000 thousand pages of paper from Pfizer for that particular group of vaccines.

Senator ROBERTS: I reference page 61, which states:

Limitations of the current application data. Safety follow-up is currently limited to median 2.4 months post dose 2 in cohort 1, and 2.4 weeks for the safety expansion cohort.

What is the safety expansion cohort?

Dr Skerritt: Remember, also, this was going back to the time of approval. We now have hundreds of millions, actually more than a billion, people who have been vaccinated with that vaccine and experience going on since December 2020, when the first vaccination was done. The safety expansion cohort is in a clinical trial where individuals are monitored closely and the data reported back to regulators for periods of months, leading to years, after their vaccination.

Senator ROBERTS: Did you recommend this substance based on 2.4 weeks of safety testing or did you get more in? If so, over what period? How many months?

Dr Skerritt: Remember the initial approval from TGA was based on that two months of follow-up, but we also had the experience of other countries that had more than a month before starting mass vaccination campaigns. When we approved Pfizer on 25 January2021, we were in almost daily contact with the British, who by that stage had vaccinated millions of British people by 25 January 2021. Real-world evidence played a very important role in both the approvals and in the ongoing safety monitoring of these vaccines.

Senator ROBERTS: So you relied on data from other countries and you relied for periods of months, merely months. It can’t be more than six months, because there’s a gap between application and approval and to give time for collection of data and analysis. There should be years of data before we start putting this stuff into our children, yet it’s months.

Dr Skerritt: I disagree in the context of a pandemic and a public health crisis. Regulators globally felt that it was appropriate to do initial approvals—

Senator ROBERTS: You’re the Australian regulator.

Dr Skerritt: As the head of the Australian regulator, I would do precisely the same if I had my time again. The alternative would have been to leave Australians unvaccinated through the course of 2020, 2021 and 2022, and there would have been tens of thousands more Australian deaths.

Senator ROBERTS: Can I reference a letter from the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, signed by Radha Khiani, Director, Governance and Coordination section, in which the department makes this claim. The letter from 4 November 2022, just last week, states:

A large team of technical and clinical experts at the TGA carefully evaluated the data submitted by the sponsor. A treatment or vaccine is only provisionally approved if this rigorous process is completed.

This document concerned the use of Pfizer stages 2 to 3 cynical trial data in support of their application for provisional approval. Did the TGA check the stage 2 and stage 3 clinical trial data from Pfizer? Did you check it?

Dr Skerritt: We did check the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data from Pfizer and we also took it to independent external medical experts as well as consumer representatives.

Senator ROBERTS: Referencing Freedom of Information No. 2289, in which the applicant requested a copy of the stage 2 and stage 3 clinical trial data, the TGA responded that the ‘TGA does not hold any relevant documents relating to the request’. That was a request for stages 2 to 3 clinical trial data.

Dr Skerritt: Without seeing what’s in your hand, I believe that you asked for individual patient data rather than the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. I can give you my word that we assessed the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data; otherwise, what else did we do? Look at the colour of the label on the bottle? That is the main thing our team of several thousand clinicians look at in reviewing a new vaccine, the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. It is the centrepiece.

Senator ROBERTS: The freedom-of-information request then asked for ‘any documents confirming the process of analysing this data to a decision, including meetings, notes, dates and times’. Again the TGA replied, ‘We have no relevant documents.’ Did you review the stage 2 and stage 3 data or not, and, if you did, why did you tell this freedom-of-information applicant you did not have these documents? Which document is the lie? One of them is.

Dr Skerritt: I don’t have that document in front of me. We can review it on notice. But we reviewed the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data at length.

CHAIR: This really needs to be the last one so I can share the call.

Senator ROBERTS: I just want you to think about this and confirm it or otherwise: and ‘the trail data contained sufficient proof the vaccines were safe and effective, sufficient to meet the criteria for provisional approval’; is that correct?

Dr Skerritt: Correct. Yes.

NZ judge and health establishment scum refuse unvaxxed blood for baby


The mother, with her six-month-old baby and lawyer Sue Grey, surrounded by media outside the NZ High Court.

A NEW Zealand mother who wanted unvaccinated blood used in her baby’s heart operation has had her request refused by the High Court, ruling in favour of a children’s hospital, the NZ Blood Service and NZ Health (health department).

Some 30 unvaccinated people with compatible blood who are supporting the mother’s request, offered to donate blood but the big pharma lackeys of the “health” establishment ganged up together to get the court and a misinformed judge, to rule in their favour.

Lawyers for the health bureaucrats admitted in court they were worried about the precedent such a situation would present, not the concerns of the mother about a potential threat to the six-month-old infant from mRNA vaccine-induced spike proteins in the blood.

To label the health establishment “corrupted” in respect of their Covid-19 response is not just a cheap shot at authority. Health departments worldwide signed up to a corrupt Covid-19 agenda that violated its own pandemic response rules, covered up the origin of the SARS-Cov.2 virus, pushed half-tested but highly-profitable vaccines and banned the safe, inexpensive, non-vaccine treatments hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin that showed positive results when used by doctors.

All the time, these same health authorities, operating under guidelines set up by the World Health Organisation and endorsed by the CDC, FDA, US health chief Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates and others, told us only these vaccines were safe and would stop the virus in its tracks – which, as it turned out, was not entirely true. And mistruths about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine continue, notably in regard to the lingering effects of the genetically-altered spike protein from the mRNA vaccine versus the wild spike protein from the virus.

Is it any wonder then, that the mother (identity protected) whose baby boy needs a heart operation, should be concerned about spike proteins in blood donated by vaccinated donors. She turned down the operation until the Starship Childrens Hospital in Auckland could operate with blood free of contamination from the genetically modified spike proteins carried by mRNA shots.

Starship, backed by NZ Health and the Blood Service, would not come to the party because they do not delineate between vaccinated and unvaccinated blood, regardless of whether is was voluntarily offered. And to add insult to injury, they took the mother to court to gain intervention authority to take custody of the child and carry out the operation and transfusion without the mother’s consent.

High Court Justice Gault said he “accepted that the parents had genuine concerns about vaccinated blood” but then sided with the medical establishment, claiming the evidence of Canadian viral immunologist and associate professor Byram Bridle did not overcome the evidence of Dr Sarah Morley, chief medical officer of the New Zealand Blood Service. So, it appears that the concerns of an independent viral immunologist are subjected to the predictable opinion of a paid employee of a blood supply business that is a client of public and private hospitals.

Judge Gault made the following misinformed and flawed ruling: ”Dr Morley’s evidence (including her reply affidavit) is that there is no scientific evidence there is any Covid-19 vaccine-related risk from blood donated by donors previously vaccinated with any New Zealand approved Covid-19 vaccine, and there are no known or suspected harmful vaccine-related effects of blood from a vaccinated individual to a recipient of any age, after millions of transfusions around the world. There is no evidence that trace amounts of vaccine in blood or blood products could cause myocarditis. If there is any spike protein at all in blood, it will be in the picogramrange (one trillionth of a gram).”

In another “concession” to the baby’s parents, the judge ruled they remain his legal guardians aside from the medical matters covered in the order. He ruled two Starship hospital doctors “to at all times keep the parents informed of their baby’s condition and treatment”. The ruling was full of half-truths and red herrings and based on controversial, incomplete and ongoing research. The precautionary principle would clearly support the mother’s request for unvaccinated blood.

We don’t know if the defence lawyer cited academics apart from Prof. Bridle, but there are a number of studies cited by other prominent scientists and doctors who are concerned about lingering spike proteins in vaccinated people. Claims are made that because the messenger RNA in the vaccine produced a genetically altered and neutralised spike protein, it is safe, unlike the spike protein of the virus, but this is doubted by experts such as Dr Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology.

Prof. Bridle, who is a member of the Canadian COVID Care Alliance doctors’ group, has raised concerns over mRNA vaccines being given to pregnant and breastfeeding mothers. Data has shown the vaccine spike protein being transferred to the infants and because more mRNA spike protein is produced in metabolically-active cells, it multiplies more in the cells of growing infants.

Prof. Bridle told Rebel News conclusions should not be drawn about the safety of the spike protein in infants, nor was there proper scientific backing for recommending breastfeeding babies within the first 48 hours after vaccination. “We have no empirical data to declare that as as safe cut-off whatsoever, but hey, this is how we treat science theses days. We assume it’s safe until proven otherwise.” He said this completely reversed the entire principle of ‘do no harm’ and assuming a procedure was unsafe until proven otherwise.

About a year ago Cairns News reported on the alert raised by Dr Malone, who appeared on the web broadcasts Dark Horse (hosted by biologist Brett Weinstein) and TrialSite News. He told Dr Erin Stair from TrialSite “it might be that the known toxicities associated with the wild-type spike protein might be also associated with the engineered spike protein that is used as the antigen in these vaccines, and right now we don’t know if that’s the case for sure, but it kind of looks like it might be”.

Malone stressed earlier in the interview that reported serious adverse events (at that time) only occurred in a “small subset” of people and he also believe that the vaccine worked effectively for many people. “These vaccines work, they are saving lives, but in some people they’re having these adverse events and the odd thing is those adverse events seem to overlap with some of the symptoms of the disease caused by the (wild) virus.” However Malone, who received a Moderna vaccination, has stated he is suffering long-term, negative side-effects from it.

Malone told Dr Stair that the critical experiments on the bio-distribution of mRNA injections were not done to the usual high standards. “In regulatory talk they were ‘non-good’ laboratory practices as opposed to the normally required good laboratory (GLP) practices.” He said non-GLP practices were normally not acceptable and these ones were based on outdated Japanese data that was not rigorous and based on rodents.

“To say to the public no corners were cut isn’t really true, and that’s where I start to have problems with all of this,” Malone said. “I think the government owes it to their populace to be open and transparent about what’s true, known and what’s unknown because they are obligated, and the pharmaceutical companies are obligated to fully disclose all risks because this is a fundamental precept of bioethics in human subject research.”

And then there are the concerns of world-leading cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough who, in an article cited a study by Helene Banoun, pharmacist, biologist, hormer Inserm (National Reseaarch Institute of France) researcher, and member of the Independent Scientific Council, Marseille. The study showed that lipid nanoparticles that carry the mRNA spread throughout the body and “have been shown to be able to be excreted through body fluids (sweat, sputum, breast milk) and to pass the transplacental barrier.”

McCullough also cited the paper by Fertig and colleagues, that found messenger RNA circulating in blood for at least two weeks. “And the curves were not going down. That’s as long as they looked,” he told an interviewer. “Röltgen and colleagues has found messenger RNA in the vaccinated in lymph nodes for months,” McCullough explained further. “It looks like the body’s not clearing it out.”

CBDC is on the way as banks cancel cheque accounts

Digital currency is well on the way for Australians while the Reserve Bank continues with its implementation and banks can cheque accounts in preparation to impound all paper money as it comes over the counter.

This week Queensland-based bank Suncorp warned its customers with cheque accounts they would be deactivated in January 2023.

Suncorp also advised it was cancelling some credit card accounts because “this service is no longer available.”

As the dummies pay at the check out with their phones or cards Klaus Schwab and the WEF are salivating at the immense control banks and governments will soon have over the people as every transaction is meticulously recorded.

The Australian Taxation Office is expecting a bonanza in extra revenue it believes electronic transaction tracking will deliver.

The treacherous LNP/ALP duopoly is rushing forth to implement the WEF’s digital currency model to keep control over people’s lives as the Covid scamdemic is fast waning and a few souls finally wake up when their jabbed friends and family members suddenly drop dead.

Commerce will suffer immensely when the cost of digital implementation hits small business and families which will be forced to buy card readers for fruit and vegetable stalls, garage sales, local markets and other every day transactions.

When the internet is shut down and there is no legal tender in circulation many people, including remote indigenous communities will starve. Barter is desirable but not the answer.

Cairns News advises total rejection of the cashless society coveted by the dodgy duopoly. Ring your federal member’s office and tell them you won’t comply.

Will you take the ‘mark of the beast?’

Ethno-environmentalist fascists demand permits to draw Uluru rock

The Mark Knight cartoon that Parks Australia demanded to be taken off the web and a permit for the rock sketch be applied for.

THE Aboriginal land rights movement is again revealing its neo-Marxist and fascist underbelly with a Federal Government department demanding a newspaper cartoonist apply for a permit to draw the world-renowned rock outcrop Uluru, previously known as Ayres Rock.

When the outcrop was handed over to Anagu “traditional owners” (custodians would be a more accurate designation) on October 26, 1985 and leased to the director of National Parks, to be jointly managed under a board made up of a majority of “traditional owners”, few Australians would have imagined it would one day require a permit to be sketched.

But the rock, once a natural wonder and national symbol, has instead become a symbol of the separatist and totalitarian agenda of the indigenous land rights movement exposed four decades ago by former Communist Party of Australia member Geoff McDonald in the early 1980s.

Up until October 26th, 2019, the custodians had only requested visitors not to climb the rock out of respect for the spiritual significance they claim it represented for them, although an increasing number of visitors continued to do so. But on that date a ban on climbing was enforced under National Parks regulation. Australia’s national wonder had now become an off-limits “sacred site”. This is increasingly becoming the case at other mountains and outcrops, especially in the Grampians in Victoria where rock climbing was banned at three sites in 2019.

Now in 2022, the trend is continuing at pace with both Victorian and NSW governments locking the public (ie non-Aboriginals) out from national parks and popular rock climbing spots such as Castle Crag in the Arapiles and Mt Warning in northern NSW.

The Spectator reported that once the Mt Warning “management plan” was in place “the act of respectfully walking to the summit on the 110-year-old track built by locals will constitute ‘harm’ and attract a fine of up to $550,000”. The is straight out corporate fascism imposing unlawful and unusually severe fines on the right of movement in one’s own country.

“Where on earth does this seem a reasonable and proportionate response to someone bush walking on a long-established track? In comparison, damaging or desecrating a Western Cultural place attracts a maximum penalty of a mere $4400,” wrote reporter Marc Hendrickx.

Parks Victoria regional director Jason Borg told the ABC they were moving towards “a more formal protection” called a ‘set aside’ under the National Park Act, “and that precludes anyone from going into that area”. The site is being assessed by Parks Victoria and the Barengi Gadjin Land Council, one of the many land councils around Australia growing in power and influence in league with corporate government environment departments.

And then came the outrageous demand on December 1st, from an agency of the Australian corporate government, Parks Australia, ordering Herald-Sun cartoonist Mark Knight to take down a cartoon of Uluru and demanding he apply for a permit to draw the rock.

Parks Australia accused Knight of breaching “media guidelines” with his cartoon and the letter from a media officer demanded the drawings be removed from the web. “These artworks do not have media permits and breach media guidelines,” the letter said.

“To comply with the EPBC Act, (Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) media guidelines, ICIP (Indigenous Cultural Intellectual Property) laws and show respect for Anangu land and culture, we ask that you remove any artwork breaching these conditions and showing Uluru.”

The Herald Sun refused to comply with the request, engaged legal counsel to fight the claim and contacted Parks Australia about the demand. Parks Australia maintained their stance, citing a 44-page government-authorised media handbook which states that organisations wanting to use the rock for commercial purposes must apply for a permit, with the guidelines in place to “protect Anangu against inappropriate use and benefits to others from the commercialisation of their Indigenous Cultural Intellectual Property”, the Herald-Sun reported.

These totalitarian impositions would not come as a surprise to Geoff McDonald, who wrote that as a Communist Party member he “learned about communist opposition to the ‘White Australia’ policy and plans of making Australia a Communist country by establishment of black republic areas of Australia inhabited by Aboriginals”.

McDonald said Red Over Black was “above all … a call for action for the defense of Australia against the psychological warfare being waged upon us. My own original concern has naturally stemmed from what I learned about communist strategy and tactics through a lifetime in the Labor and Trade Union movement, and intensified by the years I spent inside the Communist Party.”

In a follow-up book titled The Evidence, McDonald referenced a “psychological war” hotting up against Australia with tormenting propaganda about Australians being ‘racists’. “The Federal Labor government and its opposition cannot find a word to defend the good name of Australia against the charge of racism,” he wrote in a foreward.

“Lie after lie is thrown at Australia but politicians will not muster the strength to answer on behalf of the people who elect them. Liberal and Labor politicians whose perception is asleep, reach a level of self-abasement in placing themselves as decoy ducks to those who are, in broad daylight, promoting the independent nation objective.

“Even when Left controlled United Nations agencies multiply their slanders against Australia this abuse is still met with stone silence. In September, 1983, a joint parliamentary senate committee of Labor and Liberal politicians brought down a recommendation to the Federal government that they should enter into negotiations with ’representatives’ of the Aboriginal people of Australia for a treaty or ’Makaratta’ to make peace with the Aborigines.

“We are not at war with the Aborigines. As the white man’s Treaty Committee headed by Fabian Socialist Dr. H.C. Coombs admitted on a number of occasions, the call for a treaty was a white man’s invention.”

Revelation tells it all

Letter to the Editor

In response to the introduction of CBDC ‘Paul Hogan’ writes:

“And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

Revelation 13-17

666 means the Carbon, containing 6 protons, 6 neurons, and 6 electrons.
The Beast is not NWO or WHO, the Beast is the Man – ignorant, selfish, greedy, wicked, and fearful.”

Brain-dead Greens unfit to enter the senate

from Alison Ryan

Australian Senator Gerard Rennick’s Leaves Opposition Parties Angry after exposing the Lies and Hypocrisy of the Government’s Command and Control Narrative that took over the bodies of fellow Australians and which said the covid-vaccine was safe and effective.

“The Greens laugh at jab injuries & shut down debate about jab mandates”

Dumb and Dumber

Senator Rennick reports:

“Yesterday Malcolm Roberts moved an amendment to the IR Bill that would have prevented people being discriminated against on the basis of their Covid-19 vaccine status.

“I spoke to the amendment and as you can tell I was pretty fired up because I knew we didn’t have the numbers.

“This amendment would have allowed unvaxxed people in the private sector to go back to work.

“What was despicable however was that while I was speaking I was being heckled by Green Senators Larissa Waters and Sarah Hanson Young.

To mock people who have been injured by the vaccine is the lowest of the low and tells you everything you need to know about the greens party.

In fact after I spoke Hanson Young moved a motion to shut down the debate on the amendment which got up.

“The next time a change to the IR act is introduced by Labor I will move the amendment again.

“Special thanks to Malcolm and those who voted for the bill.”


Alleged Ayers Rock ‘traditional owners’ are nothing but trespassers

by Kev Moore

From the speech by Mr. Peter English, given at the launching of his book – Land Rights – Birth Rights, now available from all League bookshops, Price: “$16.00 posted. The unfortunate part about all this is that the antecedents of some members of the group now claiming Ayers Rock as their former tribal territory did not begin to move in and take over the region until AFTER the true traditional owners, (the Jankuntatjara) had voluntarily vacated the area some fifty or more years ago, and secondly, the party now being planned, which is estimated to cost the Treasury $250,000, may never be held.

“Recent anthropological research has uncovered a wealth of evidence dating back to 1936 which proves beyond any doubt that the majority of those aborigines now officially recognised as ‘the traditional owners of the Ayers Rock region’ and accepted by the Federal Government as “The Mititjulu Community” are, in the eyes of the few remaining descendants of the true traditional owners, nothing but trespassers on tribal territory that never at any time, even in the recent past, belonged to the antecedents of those now claiming ‘traditional ownership’ of the Ayers Rock region.

“My understanding of the present position in Central Australia (and my advice is as recent as two weeks ago) is that the remaining few descendants of the relatively small tribal group whose former territory once included Ayers Rock and the Olgas are violently opposed to the Federal Government’s proposal to hand their traditional homelands over to anyone, least of all to those they now look upon as ‘trespassers’.

Traditional Owners Want N.T. to Control Ayers Rock; “I understand that these very old men insist that the existing status quo be preserved where control of the Ayers Rock – Mt. Olga National Park is a matter for the Government of the Northern Territory which they themselves regard as the present lawful custodian of what was once only one of a number of totemic localities in their region and was outranked by far many other sites….”

Melbourne Children’s Hospital cannot admit more patients because Dictator Dan sacked most of the staff

by Lyndesy Symonds

This is a Big One and the internet censorship [Tip of the Hat to Frewen and Operation Covid Shield] is just as big.

Henry Makow has this up on his website this am Dec. 7 2022 for OZ.

“Melbourne Children’s Hospital tells parents to stay away due to ‘unprecedented demand’ ” In Canada, they can read The Guardian link to this story but it is blocked on my Australian server. Here it is from Makow’s website:

Henry Makow’s comment – the steak and potatoes.

Australia’s major Children’s Hospital is turning away sick children for the first time in its long history.

“It’s being caused by staff shortages due to mass-firing of unvaccinated nurses and doctors, plus rapidly increasing vaccine related child-sickness.” They admitted it!

Makow’s lead post for Dec 6 also contains information and leads on the same
story with the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario.

Dec 6 – Hospitals Overwhelmed by Sick Kids. Dec 6 2022—hospitals-overwhelmed-.html?_ga=2.104366272.1301417238.1669843648-1369995310.1664405876

Climate change is all about robbing the planet by transferring your tax dollars to kleptocrats abroad

by Jim Rickards

Showing that the Green New Deal is actually the Green New Scam has always been easy.

All you have to do is refer to scientific facts rather than pseudo-science and phony models. Then you’re on the right track.

There are now so many polar bears some countries are considering hunting.

For example, did you know that polar bear populations have tripled in recent years and some countries are considering allowing a polar bear hunt?

That’s quite a contrast to the last lonely polar bear swimming for a melting piece of drift ice in Al Gore’s 2006 book and movie An Inconvenient Truth.

Did you know that the climate models used by the UN can’t even backtest correctly with actual data let alone forecast with speculative data?

Did you know that CO2 is not a pollutant? It’s actually plant food and we could use more of it if we really want a green planet.

Did you know that hurricanes, tornados and blizzards are neither more frequent nor more severe than in past decades?

Did you know that forest fires in California are caused by gross mismanagement of forests rather than climate?

This list goes on, but you get the point.

Most of the data thrown around by climate alarmists are either false or not nearly as troubling as it sounds when put in an empirical context.

To the extent the climate does change over time, it has nothing to do with CO2 and methane and much more to do with sunspots, ocean currents, volcanoes, the jet stream and other natural forces we cannot control.

That much is easy.

The difficult part in my mind has always been, why?

Why do so many elites and other supposedly smart people repeat scientific garbage ad nauseum to hypnotize large populations who lack the data or skills needed to tear the alarmist claims apart?

At the recent climate summit conference held in the luxury resort of Sharm El Sheikh in Egypt called COP27, the parties agreed to transfer over $230 billion to poorer countries as “climate reparations” for damage supposedly done by wealthy nations.

Never mind that the delegates mostly arrived by private jets that spew more CO2 in a few hours than an automobile does in years.

Never mind that the largest polluter in the world, China, will not be contributing to the fund.

Never mind that the entire basis for claims of damage from CO2 emissions is bogus.

None of this can be allowed to stand in the way of the agenda.

The entire green new scam is just a device to transfer wealth from rich western nations to poor nations all over the world.

It’s a financial hijacking conducted by people who hate America and love wealth transfers to socialist and corrupt nations around the world.

That’s the dirty little secret behind the climate alarmist agenda.

It’s not about saving the planet. It’s about robbing the planet by transferring your tax dollars to kleptocrats abroad.

Forget about global warming. Just get your checkbook out and hand over the money.

Thank you for being a member of our community and have a great weekend. All the best,

COVID Fanatics Melt Down Over Twitter Removing Censorship Rules

By Kathleen J. Anderson – December 1, 2022

The left-wing Twitterheads have got to be exhausted because it has been one epic meltdown after another thanks to Elon Musk’s push for a transparent and free speech social media platform. Oh, the humanity!

Most recently, the hyperbole-laden tweets from the left establishment have been focused on a recent change to Twitter policy regarding COVID-19. Ah, COVID. Do you remember when we used to call it The Rona? 

COVID seems like that ex-boyfriend you wish you could erase from your memory but likes to keep popping up on your memory feed, reminding you about your past poor life decisions. Unfortunately, for the left, it’s more like that bad boy ex-boyfriend they can’t seem to quit.

Now, that Twitter ended ‘Covid misinformation’ policies, let’s review the Experts™ misinformation: 1. 15 days to slow the spread 2. Masks work 3. Lockdowns work 4. Natural immunity is a myth 5. mRNA shots are vaccines 6. Covid shots stop transmission 7. ‘100% safe & effective’

Read the full story [HERE]

Australian electoral system still plagued by fraud, solutions ignored

A sample how to vote card from Cowper electorate. A voter (below) who followed the Nationals card had their vote made informal because of what appeared to be two “1” marks. However a reasonable ruling could see the angled “1” mark next to the Greens candidate was most likely a 7. The only question is how the top of the 7 disappeared. It could quite easily have been erased with a rubber.

ELECTIONS analyst and former NSW senior public servant Lex Stewart believes some three per cent or possibly more of the votes in the recent Victorian election were fraudulent.

Stewart has been investigating vote fraud for many years and in October this year, in a submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters, went over the problems that repeatedly occur.

“Based on history and my experiences, I would guess that a significant amount of vote frauds, perhaps up to 3% of votes, were frauded in the Victoria state election – more than 3% frauded if some Sctyl or Dominion voting machines were used,” Stewart wrote in an email to Cairns News.

He said his investigations of this year’s federal election in the seat of Cowper confirmed the widespread problems including vote fraud, that still affect the Australian electoral system and that electoral authorities repeatedly fail to fix.

Although Cowper was not a marginal seat and safely held by the National Party for many years, some basic scrutineering by Stewart revealed the same problems in that seat.

“I attended the Prepoll counting centre in Port Macquarie from 4pm on 21 May 2022 till 2am to observe the processing of about 45,557 ballot papers from the PrePoll Voting Centres (PPVCs) of Cowper,” he wrote in his submission.

“Among all Cowper ballot papers, 4.93% were informal. During the processing of the approximately 2245 informals among the prepolls, I was able to observe and write down the patterns for 244 ballot papers.”

  • 122 were blank, perhaps indicating a determination not to vote, or total confusion.
  • 26 would have been formal under NSW optional preferential voting.
  • 20 ballot papers were ruled informal due to having two “1”s, having been filled in as per the How-to-Vote (HTV) leaflet of Pat Conaghan (see HTV below), but where there was a “1” instead of a “7” opposite the Greens candidate (see example of a ballot paper below).
  • 11 eleven had one blank square, and four had the 6 beside Caz Heise converted into an 8.

Although 244 ballot papers is not a big sample, the errors, when extrapolated into percentages of the entire informal vote, can easily mean a candidate winning or losing a seat. Even the numbers in that small sample could win or lose a seat.

Stewart’s submission pointed out that overnight security of storage of pre-poll ballot papers was a problem. “While these are stored in sealed ballot boxes, it would be possible, though difficult, to use long tweezers to pull ballot papers up out of the ballot boxes, and then to use an eraser to rub out a pencil number and write a new number,” he wrote.

He said if the statistics (20, 11 and 4 out of 244) could be scaled up from the sample of 244 to apply to the approximately 2245 informals among the pre-polls, then (Nationals candidate and eventual winner) Pat Conaghan missed out on 320 votes due to pencil marks being erased or altered.

“I think that the lesson is do not vote in pencil because a ballot paper might be altered.”

Stewart noted that previous government inquiries recommended a national roll-out of Electronic Certified Lists and/or ‘ECL Lite’, to be fully funded and implemented prior to the 2019 federal election. This has not happened.

On the basic question of whether vote fraud occurred Stewart cited some quotations and examples:

3.1.1 “That the electoral system is open to manipulation is beyond question… Fraudulent enrolment is almost impossible to prevent.” (NSW Electoral Commissioners, Messrs R. Cundy and Ian Dickson, in the NSW Government Inquiry 1989) [A side comment 19/9/19 from Lex Stewart – i.e. almost impossible to prevent under the system as it then was, but it can be prevented by implementing recommendations 12 and 25 above]

3.1.2 “Electoral fraud, malpractice and errors are a common feature of the Australian electoral system,” Alex Howen, Metropolitan Vice-Pres of the NSW Liberal Party 11/9/1999

3.1.3 78% of several thousand people voted “Yes” on in year 2001 to the question “Should a Royal Commission be held into Electoral Fraud?”

3.1.3 The Shepherdson Inquiry in Queensland found that ALP members had done vote frauds in 1986, 1993 and 1996. This was a finding by a judge, based on evidence

3.1.4 Dr Amy McGrath OAM has written several books about vote frauds. She first discovered vote frauds when she was a member of the ALP and was working during World War 2 in the Balmain branch of the Ironworkers’ Union, and was given a list of dead people’s names and told to go and vote in those names. She made 17 Submissions to the JSCEM during 1993 to 2014, and was largely ignored. Her books are:-

1. “The Forging of Votes” ISBN 0 9591879 3 6 – published in 1994, it describes Vote Frauds that happened during WW2 and subsequently

2. “Corrupt Elections” (with sub-title:- Ballot Rigging in Australia) circa 1997 ISBN 0 9587104 0 6 summary of a seminar with 15 speakers, including Sen Nick Minchin and Marshall Cooke QC.

3. “The Frauding of Votes” published circa 2002 ISBN 0 9591879 9 5

4. “The Frauding of Votes”, second edition with a 30-page powerful Introduction by famous crime-fighting journalist Bob Bottom OAM ISBN 0-9587104-3-0

5. “The Stolen Election, Australia 1987” (with sub-title:- according to Frank Hardy) circa 2005 ISBN 0 95871045-7

6. “The Frauding of Elections?” published in 2003, with Appendix by Peter Brun

7. “Wolves in Australia” published in 2013. It covers many topics other than vote frauds, which are mentioned as she predicted a new type of vote fraud to be implemented by GetUP on pages 451-455. (I discovered GetUp workers doing this type of activity in Macquarie in the 2016 election in which Liberal Louise Markus narrowly lost her seat).

3.1.5 Karen Ehrmann went to jail in year 2000 for electoral fraud. She said she was just the ‘patsy’ and that many others in the ALP were doing what she did.

3.1.6 The case of Alasdair Webster losing Macquarie in 1993 by 164 votes is described in Appendix 9. In brief there had been lots of deliberately false enrolments made e.g. on vacant blocks of land, plus many other types of deliberate vote frauds.

One conclusion is that the process for appealing to the High Court a faulty election is very difficult and expensive (perhaps deliberately so).

A far better solution to electoral problems would be as advocated by Dr Amy McGrath OAM and accepted by the Sydney Morning Herald which published her proposal for an Electoral Ombudsman – refer to appendix 4.

3.1.7 UK Election Commissioner Richard Mawrey QC has sent people from both sides of politics to jail in the UK. In year 2005 he published a good book, “Fraud at the Elections” ISBN 0 85124 708 3. I assisted in arranging his brief speaking tour in Australia, when he came here for other reasons. He was aghast at Australia’s voting systems and said “Australia’s postal voting system is a recipe for voting frauds” and “If the avenues for vote frauds exist, then one can expect that they will be used, due to the incentives of political power.”

Homeschool your kids and teach them hunting and fishing

by columnist Lyndesy Symonds

We have jiggy-jiggy elections and a United [Communist] Nations CoVID Regime government that is running a standard issue communist genocide with a bioweapon. We have laws that enable school programmes to castrate your children. We have a bio-metric, DNA database control grid shaping up which will simply triangulate and ZOT any sheeple who says or thinks this type of social engineering is NOT a good thing.

Get your kids out of state schools, where they will be forcibly jabbed, castrated, kneel for BLM or know more nonsense about blackfellas than blackfellas themselves. Start homeschooling, teach them about God, how to read and write, shoot and fish because they will need it soon. Pic Domain

Of course, it is the socially responsible thing for O2 breathers / CO2 expirers, useless eaters and space taker-uppers and carbon footprints to do the right thing and co-operate with our genocide. Let’s save Mother Earth and flatten the human curve.

Government / Big Corporate relentlessly instructs us: ‘People who own firearms are the baddies who shoot up schools and shopping malls. They are not on mantra and message with the sponsors. They are not singing the happy sheeple song and following the Handlers into the holding pens and through the on-ramp into the abbatoir’.

In the homeschools all children should be taught boating, camping, hunting and fishing and that includes the responsible use of firearms.

ABC Song But with Guns.

%d bloggers like this: