Category Archives: United Nations

Ukraine update

Kyiv, Ukraine, May 23, 2022

EXCLUSIVE

Cairns News military correspondent Colonel Yuri Komiyenko of Russian forces said yesterday approximately 1970 Ukrainian military personnel and foreign troops hiding below ground at Azovstal in Mariupol, have surrendered to the Russians. They are being processed for a war tribunal. The Ukrainian government is referring to the surrender as an evacuation.  

Cossack Colonel Yuri Komiyenko displays a Russian PPSh-41 sub-machine gun near the front line in Ukraine

He said of the large number of NATO personnel captured, 54 were high-ranking, that is above officer status, colonels and generals. Another 12 of the captured personnel are high ranking NATO Generals, they are from a variety of NATO countries such as Canada, the United States and numerous other countries including one Israeli General. 

Through an interpreter Colonel Komiyenko said: 

“The Russian Forces were surprised to find a Chinese national within the group, as well as an African who was unable to speak any of the local dialects or English. An interpreter studying foreign languages was located.

“Seems the man spent his life savings to get to the Ukraine to fight as he was under the impression that he could earn USD $1000 per day.” 

The Chechen forces have vowed to stay until the last is caught. Some of the tunnels are heavily mined and it is the opinion of Russian Forces that other military personnel are hidden deeper underground.

“President Putin’s phone has been running hot with offers of large cash payments if he releases some of the captured military personnel, but he no longer answers his phone,” Colonel Komivenko said. 

“We have learned that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky since becoming president is now worth $850M USD, and he recently bought a house in Florida for $37M.” 

As Russia continues to gather evidence of bioweapons labs, the colonel stated that the proof is indisputable and points directly at the US and its partners.

Attempts were made to remove note books and paperwork from the Azovstal bioweapons lab by civilian cars. These activities were filmed and the data retrieved.  

The Russia forces continue their offensive against the fascists within the Ukrainian army and politburo, determined to remove all bio-security labs near its border with Ukraine. 

“Roughly one week ago Russians were able to film the Ukrainian forces making an example of a Ukrainian Captain. It would appear that he had a differing opinion to his command so the Ukrainian military chained him to machines and then used the machines to pull the man apart.” he said.

“In a earlier event the Ukrainians were removing their wounded from tunnels to the surface, then they shot the wounded and dumped their bodies. The Russian Forces were able to video this crime prior to taking down the criminals.” 

He further added that of the consignment of Bushmaster armoured cars sent to Ukraine by the Australian Government, only two survived when a train carrying them to the front line was destroyed by a Russian air strike.  # 

ALP Albanese supports WHO Pandemic Treaty just like PM Morrison

WHO treaty should be ratified by Parliament not Cabinet

by Kev Moore
No Australia is not losing ” sovereignty” to the WHO and China next week.????
https://citizensparty.org.au/media-releases/no-australia-not-losing-sovereignty-who-and-china-next-week.

Explainer – The Treaty Process in Australia
9 April 2018 |

This explainer sets out the legal process that underpins how a treaty is created under International Law and then incorporated into Australian domestic law. Definitions of key terms related to the treaty process have been taken from the United Nations and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade .

What is a Treaty?

Australia becoming a party to a treaty is a legal process.

The Australian law recognises that a treaty is:

… an agreement between States (countries) which is binding at international law. In some cases international organisations can be parties to treaties. Even if a document is agreed between two or more sovereign countries, it will not be a treaty unless those countries intend the document to be binding at international law. DFAT

Section 61 of the Australian Constitution allows Australia to enter into treaties as an exercise of Executive Power. Treaties are then tabled in both Houses of Parliament.

A treaty is generally tabled after it has been signed for Australia, but before any treaty action is taken which would bind Australia under international law. DFAT

The legal process for Australia to sign, ratify or accede/implement to an international agreement/treaty is set out below:

Signature – agreement in principle, but not legally bound by the treaty.

Ratification – a binding agreement that Australia will implement the treaty. In the case of a multi-lateral United Nations agreement an instrument of ratification prepared by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade is deposited with the UN Secretary-General after being approved by the Governor-General in Council.

Accession/Implementation – the Parliament implements the agreement as an Act of Parliament

Example: the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) implements the Convention for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

UN Charter
“Entry into force for Australia 1 November 1945”
.
In force generally
24 October 1945 description
Charter of the United Nations [UN]
.
Notes and references to published text
Signed for Australia 26 June 1945 by F M Forde and H V Evatt. Instrument of ratification deposited for Australia 1 November 1945. Entry into force for Australia 1 November 1945. Also applies to Norfolk Island.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/other/dfat/treaty_list/mulist/1945.html

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1945/1.html

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/other/dfat/treaty_list/TL-keyword-index.html

http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~davidv/alr/secure/tables-OLD/Aust_journals_table.html

http://www.worldlii.org/catalog/33.html

It may be of interest to know that Australia ratified the full text of the United Nations Charter as a treaty in 1945 and in so doing gave away its sovereignty. Communist “Doc”Evatt and dupe, P.M. Ford signed on behalf of Australia.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/ATS/1945/1.html
Charter of the United Nations, as amended [1945] ATS 1

[ To understand the UN, see the book, “THE FEARFUL MASTER A SECOND LOOK AT THE UNITED NATIONS” by G. Edward Griffin ]

“Government is not reason;
it is not eloquence;
it is force! Like fire,
it is a dangerous servant
and a fearful master!”
George Washington

WHO could push aside Australian police and take over in a contrived pandemic

Letter to the Editor

I’m not sure if I have worked it out but the United Nations have a long-term contract with Thuraya satellite phones.

Thuraya salellite aerials being fitted to Qld cop cars
Quensland Police to roll out Mercedes police cars, get booked while traffic branch drives in luxury. Who is paying for the Mercedes saloons?

The urban police cars in Queensland have been fitted with Thuraya antennas. Are the UN forces going to compulsory acquire the Australian government vehicles and push the Australian police aside if there is a health emergency after the 22 may 2022 when the Australian government signs the new pandemic WHO legislation that allows the World Health organisation and UN troops to govern Australia in a Health emergency?

I been working on it for 3 days. I noticed the urban police cars are being fitted with Thuraya satellite antennas, seamed strange to me as they have VHF radios with phone capabilities on the GSM network. I went down the rabbit hole and this is my conclusion. Maybe I’m wrong Maybe I’m spot on.
https://www.ungm.org/Public/Notice/47323

from jgbaustralia,

Brisbane

Biden wants an additional $40B slush fund for Ukranian mafia

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) demanded on Thursday what many Americans were thinking about in regard to sending aid to Ukraine: fiscal accountability.

“We cannot save Ukraine by dooming the United States economy,” Paul reasoned. “This bill under consideration would spend $40 billion. This is the second spending bill for Ukraine in two months, and this bill is three times larger than the first,” he said.

Paul is not against sending aid to Ukraine just because he wanted to make sure the money was being used appropriately. He insisted on having an inspector general oversee the distribution of the aid. Other senators did not agree.

Senator Rand Paul wants to monitor any more funds handed to Ukraine

But Paul’s demand makes a lot of sense. It is not a bad idea to have someone ensure accountability. All one must do is look through the recent omnibus bill to observe how the country wastes money on excess programs that are of little importance to how the country functions. Not wanting to replicate such an issue with billions of dollars allocated to Ukraine is a good thing. The fact that there was such resistance to Paul’s request should worry every taxpayer. Their objections raise the question of what exactly the Senate wants to hide about how the funds are spent.

Additionally, as part of his concerns, he noted that one of the main reasons the Soviet Union fell apart was not its defeat on the battlefield but reckless spending. He warned of a potentially similar fate and highlighted the excessive expenditures of the United States over the past few years.

“We should not forget that the Soviet Union collapsed in large part, not because it was defeated militarily, but because it ran out of money,” Paul said.

With the country enduring record inflation, the government should be more mindful of its financial commitments and, more importantly, where these funds are going. All things considered, Paul’s request was not in any way unreasonable.

“In an attempt to save Ukraine, will we doom the United States to such a future?” Paul asked. “In the past two years, the U.S. has borrowed more money than at any time in our history. We are already experiencing the greatest rate of inflation in over four decades. The assault on monetary discipline is untenable, and it cannot go on forever. Unless we put an end to this fiscal insanity, a day of reckoning awaits us.”

Paul also highlighted how the U.S. would get the money necessary to send to Ukraine. It is the elephant in the room that politicians frequently ignore or try to sweep under the rug.

“And it’s not as if we have that money lying around,” Paul emphasized. “We will borrow that money from China to send it to Ukraine.”

The war in Ukraine is a worldwide emergency, and many innocent Ukrainians are dying because of the whims of a totalitarian madman. The U.S. recognizes this and provides more financial aid than any other country. However, taxpayers deserve to know how this $40 billion is spent. While much attention has been placed on Paul holding up the aid legislation, the more important issue is why are so many senators against ensuring that billions of taxpayer dollars aren’t being misused? – Washington Examiner

LNP/ALP Digital Identity laws a ‘licence to live’

Local Government partners with the UN to implement Agenda 21/30

by Alison Ryan

2019

Local Government Councils work hand in hand with Federal and State governments and partner up with various UN bodies to implement Agenda 21 goals (UN SDG 2030). Under Liberal/National and Labor and Greens – it’s all been full steam ahead. Nowadays, Asian friends tell me the Australian education system is 2 years behind that in other Asian countries.

Soft touch and ignorant local government body passed a motion calling for a ‘climate emergency’

The top experts enlisted to create change in curricula for Global Education under the SDGs come from the ranks of the Trilateral Commission, such as Tom Kompas, Professor at the University of Melbourne, and ANU. Other Australian/NZ members on the TC list from the Asia-Pacific Group are:

Prof Quentin Grafton, Director of Food-Energy-Environment-Water (FE2W) Network, Chairman of UNESCO Chair in Water Economics & Transboundary Water Governance, Director of Centre for Water Economics, Environment & Policy (CWEEP) at the Crawford School of Public Policy, Convener Geneva Actions on Human Water Security, Convener Water Justice Hub

Allan Gyngell, Fellow Australian Institute of International Affairs (FAIIA),Convenor, Coombs Forum; Director, Crawford Australian Leadership Forum

*John R. Hewson, Former Federal Opposition Liberal Party Leader, Australia Professor and Chairman of Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU, *Executive Committee

Tom Kompas, Director of Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU; Director of Australian Centre for Biosecurity and Environmental Economics (ACBEE); Editor-in-Chief of Asia and the Pacific Policy Journal, University of Melbourne

Mike Moore, Former New Zealand Ambassador to the US; former Director-General, World Trade Organization, Geneva; former Prime Minister of New Zealand

Michael Wesley, Director, Academic Outreach and Research, National Security College, Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU, Deputy Vice-Chancellor (International) at University of Melbourne
See: The Trilateral Commission

Michael McCormack (Nationals MP) is quoted: “local government should be recognised in the constitution”, from a news report on Monday 17 June, 2019, “Local councils vote for a referendum”.

Australia’s councils have voted to demand a referendum giving local government constitutional recognition.

The motion, calling for the government to initiate a referendum “at the earliest opportunity”, was carried 201 votes to three at the National General Assembly of the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) in Canberra on Monday.

“Local Government presently depends on the continued will of the various State legislatures to empower local government to exist and perform various functions,” the motion put forward by Toowoomba Regional Council states.

“It seems preferable that the Commonwealth entrench the right for councils to exist and perform certain roles.”

If agreed to by the government, it would be the third referendum on giving local councils constitutional recognition after previous referenda held under the Whitlam and Hawke Labor governments both crashed.

It’s also not the first time ALGA has taken a crack at a referendum. A motion for a referendum within five years was passed at last year’s NGA but was given a polite thumbs down by the federal government, which said in a subsequent letter to ALGA it had no immediate plans to change the constitution.

[However]
Qualified support from the government in Monday’s vote came after Deputy Prime Minister Michael McCormack told delegates earlier in the day that local government should be recognised in the constitution to enable direct funding.

“I think, I believe, I know that local government should be in the constitution,” he said to applause from the audience.
“There is probably no more important thing than the commonwealth be able to fund local government directly, so that we can avoid going through the bureaucracy and so that we can get the money direct to where it needs to go, and that’s right on the ground.”

But he added a referendum had to be worded in the right way to convince the Australian public, and it had to be put to them at the right time.

“I know we’ve had referenda on it before, but next time when it goes up – and it has to, it should, it must – we have to get the wording right. And we have to put it in at a time when the Australian voting public is in the mood that they’re going to carry it.”

The referendum was among the first of a total of 121 motions that are up for debate over the next two days.

Motions to restore Financial Assistance Grants, support recycling and take action on climate change also featured heavily in Monday’s debate.

Motions passed at the ALGA NGA
# That the federal government declare a climate emergency
# That a minister be appointed to assist councils in their response the changing environment
# That the federal government establish a national strategy for climate change adaptation and resilience
# That the government consider indemnifying councils that take climate change mitigation initiatives
# That the current drought be elevated to natural disaster status
See: Local councils vote for a referendum – Government News

Regionalism is also a tool of the UN for integrating economies. The 5 UN Regional Commissions – United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLAC), United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) and United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (UNESCWA) work like underground moles at the subregional and regional levels to make an end-run around national sovereignty.

Riccardo Bosi says One Country, One People, One Flag is coming


Riccardo Bosi joins Maria Zee to discuss the state of our Nation, problems plaguing our citizens, the urgent need to re-instate the Constitution and the response (or lack thereof) from the Governor General and Prime Minister who are under a cloud of alleged child trafficking.

www.australiaoneparty.com

Authorised by Riccardo Bosi, Stanhope Gardens, NSW

A Labor, Greens duopoly will stop all animal production, sports and make you eat insects

Letter to the Editor

They’re coming for our farm animals, horses & pets, dogs, cats, all pets under the guise of animal-related sport.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10496783/Huge-fines-Australians-dont-walk-dogs.html

This is an attempt to move all animals above human lives. Think about it. Is it right that they put chickens above the lives of the farmers that own the chickens?

The government’s duty is to protect the life, liberty, pursuit of happiness and “the property” of each person against any advances, infringements and restrictions that another person and/or group may attempt to impose on the individual. And that is where we run into the communist policies of the United Nations Agenda 21.

UN Agenda 21. A non-governmental organization called the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives, ICLEI control Local Government, Local Councils & is tasked with carrying out the goals of Agenda 21 worldwide.

Agenda 21 and Animal “Rights” are however, political agendas that affect your family, your health, your job, your dogs, and how you perceive the world.

Maurice Strong advocates using Non-Government Organizations like the HSUS to institute the policies of UN Agenda 21 in every country worldwide.

Now you are seeing the connection between the push for “animal rights” and the umbrella organization of the HSUS which is the Humane Society International (HSI), one of 983 Non-Government Organizations (NGO’s) created to push the policies and ideology of UN Agenda 21. The HSUS’s role is to demonize and vilify America’s farmers, ranchers (and breeders of companion animal species) and to institute the policies of UN Agenda 21 in America. The Global plan is well under way. Count the initiatives; to attack our animal agriculture industries, drive up the cost of animal production, criminalize our animal agriculture industries

Cartright observes PZP is owned by the HSUS. PZP contraceptive research {Ref #3}. To stop the BLM from castrating horses instead of using PZP owned by HSUS, wild horse activists are suing the United States’ government over its plans to castrate hundreds of horses in eastern Nevada, hoping to block the implementation of a precedent-setting plan to regulate wild-horse populations.

I think you will agree that your neighbor, the HSUS, the local police or animal control people have no authority to deprive you of your God-given dominion over the animals, fish or fowl that you own.

https://www.thedogpress.com/Columns/Animal-Rights-Agenda-21_Cozad-142.asp

https://www.thedogpress.com/DogSense/Agenda21-animal-rights-123.asp

Google Scholar has many articles on animal rights. Disturbing.

https://www.thedogpress.com/Columns/Animal-Rights-Agenda-21_Cozad-142.asp

from Gaber 2

NSW

Russia bans 287 lying, British politicians from entering the country for promoting “unwarranted Russophobic hysteria”

by Alison Ryan

The truth of NATO provocation against Russia still needs to be stated amidst the plethora of USA and UK and European propaganda.

Putin promised to finish what he called the “special military operation” to seize territory from Ukraine, which Moscow considers historically to be Russian. He blamed NATO nations and their allies for instigating the battle currently under way in Ukraine.

“The countries that have historically tried to contain Russia don’t need a self-sufficient, massive country such as ours. They think it is dangerous to them just by means of its existence. But that is far from the truth. They are the ones threatening the whole world,” said Putin. He said, “By launching the offensive in Ukraine, Russian forces neutralised “a real danger of … a major conflict that would have unfolded on our territory according to other people’s scripts”.

In Moscow, Putin and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres met to discuss the situation at the Azovstal steel plant, where the last Ukrainian defenders of Mariupol (NATO troops included) are holed up after months of Russian siege and relentless bombardment. President Putin has called what’s unfolding in Mariupol a difficult and tragic situation. Putin said to UN chief: ‘You’ve been misled’ about Mariupol’s situation. Putin has agreed “in principle” to UN and International Committee for the Red Cross (ICRC) involvement in the evacuation of civilians from a besieged steel plant in Ukraine’s southern city of Mariupol, according to the UN.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4FFBpajMxU&t=16s

Meanwhile Russia has imposed personal restrictions on 287 British members of parliament and banned them from entering the country, accusing them of fuelling “unwarranted Russophobic hysteria”, the country’s foreign ministry has announced.

Also, Moscow says it is expelling eight Japanese diplomats in a tit-for-tat response to expulsions by Tokyo. Russia’s foreign ministry accused Japan of pursuing an “openly hostile anti-Russian course” and said the country’s envoys must depart by May 10. It accused Tokyo of “taking steps that were unprecedented in modern Russian-Japanese relations” and “abandoning friendly, constructive relations with Russia”. Earlier this month, Japan expelled eight Russian diplomats and announced it will end imports of Russian coal.

Russia is investigating the “installation of explosive devices by neo-Nazis in Mykolaiv,” state news agency TASS has reported, citing a Telegram post of The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. “According to the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, in Nikolaev [Mykolaiv], near an aircraft repair plant, neo-Nazis have installed radio-controlled explosive devices with damaging elements that they plan to detonate in a mass gathering of people and blame the Russian military for this,” the report said.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/26/russia-warns-poland-bulgaria-it-will-cut-off-gas-supplies-liveblog

Repudiate WHO Treaty, put the LNP/ALP/ Greens last

by Alison Ryan

Now is the time for “sovereign states to exercise the right to repudiate” the WHO Treaty on Pandemic, Preparedness and Response. We need therefore to make our vote count this election by voting for the freedom parties and putting the major parties – Libs, Labour, Nationals, and Greens – in the very last boxes. These have long sold us out to global governance, created illegitimate laws, and aided and abetted the demise of our common wealth.

Take a look at the history of the UN WHO Constitution and its tenets.

CONSTITUTION OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (1)

THE STATES Parties to this Constitution declare, in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations, that the following principles are basic to the happiness, harmonious relations and security of all peoples:

Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.

Pauline Hanson: Australia must get out of the United Nations

The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition.

The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security and is dependent upon the fullest co-operation of individuals and States.

The achievement of any State in the promotion and protection of health is of value to all.

Unequal development in different countries in the promotion of health and control of disease, especially communicable disease, is a common danger.

Healthy development of the child is of basic importance; the ability to live harmoniously in a changing total environment is essential to such development.

The extension to all peoples of the benefits of medical, psychological and related knowledge is essential to the fullest attainment of health.

Informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.

Governments have a responsibility for the health of their peoples which can be fulfilled only by the provision of adequate health and social measures.

ACCEPTING THESE PRINCIPLES, and for the purpose of co-operation among themselves and with others to promote and protect the health of all peoples, the Contracting Parties agree to the present Constitution and hereby establish the World Health Organization as a specialized agency within the terms of Article 57 of the Charter of the United Nations.
_________
(1) The Constitution was adopted by the International Health Conference held in New York from 19 June to 22 July 1946, signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Off. Rec. Wld Hlth Org., 2, 100), and entered into force on 7 April 1948.
Amendments adopted by the Twenty-sixth, Twenty-ninth, Thirty-ninth and Fifty-first World Health Assemblies (resolutions WHA26.37, WHA29.38, WHA39.6 and WHA51.23) came into force on 3 February 1977, 20 January 1984, 11 July 1994 and 15 September 2005
respectively and are incorporated in the present text.

Source: Basic documents: forty-ninth edition (including amendments adopted up to 31 May 2019), World Health Organization 2020, page 1

Annex 1
MEMBERS OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (at 31 May 2019)
The Members and Associate Members of the World Health Organization are listed below, with the date on which each became a party to the Constitution or the date of admission to associate membership.
Australia*……………………………………………………………. 2 February 1948
* Member States that have acceded to the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies and its Annex VII.

Source: Basic documents: forty-ninth edition (including amendments adopted up to 31 May 2019), World Health Organization 2020, page 227

See: Withdrawal from the United Nations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_from_the_United_Nations#cite_note-10

Proposed Australia withdrawal – Pauline Hanson’s One Nation support Australia leaving the United Nation.https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/one-nation-policies-the-definitive-guide-to-the-views-of-pauline-hanson-and-her-senators-20161017-gs3z1s.html

One Nations says; We are a party that stands for Australia and Australian values. We defend our constitution and stand up against global agendas for the individual rights and fundamental freedoms of all Australians.
https://www.onenation.org.au/

Klaus Schwab’s three mentors were leading proponents of a One World Government and depopulation agenda

by Alexandra Bruce

Johnny Vedmore recently published an article about the hidden history of the mysterious World Economic Forum, which is currently waging war against the world with its Great Reset.

Founder and Director, Klaus Schwab’s three mentors were the most influential people in America’s thermonuclear deterrence program, as well as leading proponents of a One World Government.

Evil Henry Kissinger of the Council for Foreign Relations recruited WEF’s Klaus Schwab at a CIA funded seminar

Henry Kissinger recruited Klaus Schwab at the International Harvard Seminar, which was funded by the CIA.

During this time, Kissinger was focused on global governance and depopulation.

But it was with the Council on Foreign Relations that Kissinger became a major player, by war-gaming psychological operations, involving America’s growing thermonuclear weapons arsenal ad writing the book on nuclear weapons and foreign policy.

John K Galbraith was a highly-influential economist who helped Klaus Schwab create the World Economic Forum.

Galbraith was an economist at Harvard who traveled to Germany in 1938 to study land policies under Hitler’s National Socialist government.

From there, he went to work for an advisory committee for FDR’s New Deal.

After World War II ended, his work shifted into nuclear weapons. Galbraith was tasked with evaluating the economic effects of the wartime bombing. He interrogated Nazi war criminal, Albert Speer and was sent to Hiroshima and Nagasaki to evaluate the damage caused by the nuclear weapons attack.

By 1968, Galbraith had joined Kissinger in his pursuit of a One World Government and it was during this time that Kissinger introduced Galbraith to Klaus Schwab, along with Herman Kahn, who in 1967 suggested subverting democracy by training a select group of global leaders, which later became the World Economic Forum’s Young Global Leaders.

Both Kissinger and Galbraith were heavily involved in the religion of nuclear deterrent warfare but Herman Kahn was, as the New Yorker puts it, “the heavyweight of the Megadeath Intellectuals” and is commonly referred to as “the real Dr Strangelove”.

Kahn wrote the official military policy on nuclear deterrence and believed that if everyone had nuclear weapons, the world would know peace.

By the late ’60s, Kahn was pushing for a European Union and joined Galbraith in 1970 on a European speaking tour to support Klaus Schwab’s recruitment drive for the first European Union’s first management symposium, now known as the World Economic Forum.

And while they were doing that, Klaus Schwab helped merge his father’s nuclear weapons company into a company that he then directed to illegally build nuclear weapons for the South African government.

In 1972, the Club of Rome published ‘The Limits to Growth’, which planted the seeds of the depopulation agenda. And while Kahn, Kissinger and Galbraith helped Schwab get started, what really brought him the international support he was hoping for was when he introduced the ideas of depopulation.

All Klaus Schwab really cares about is world government, depopulation and thermonuclear war.

In 1972, the Club of Rome’s founder was invited by Schwab to make the keynote speech in 1973. As controversial as it was – even Herman Kahn opposed it – the World Economic Forum suddenly caught the attention and support of powerful elitists everywhere and blew up to what it has become today.

The article suggests that Schwab’s supervillain persona is a deliberate marketing tactic to gain the attention of those who seek power and wealth to join Schwab as stakeholders in society.

The author believes that the World Economic Forum is reaching its maximum level of expansion before its inevitable collapse, because eventually, people will fight back.

But they already know that and all they really seem to care about is world government, depopulation and thermonuclear war.

%d bloggers like this: