Category Archives: Pauline Hanson

Arrogant TGA head Dr John Skerritt ducks for cover as Roberts accuses him of vaccine impropriety

Federal Police should be investigating Professor John Skerrit’s onshore and offshore bank accounts. Former PM Scott Morrison accrued $52 Million while PM. How much has Bro John salted away? (https://cairnsnews.org/2022/02/23/scott-morrison-under-the-microscope/)

Senator ROBERTS: Can you tell me how many medicines were approved under the provisional approval pathway during the COVID period 1 July 2020 to date? My numbers are 13 vaccines and six drugs; is that correct?

Dr Skerritt: Are you talking specifically about COVID treatments and COVID vaccines?

Senator ROBERTS: No, any vaccines or drugs that have been approved using the provisional pathway.

Dr Skerritt: I will start with COVID vaccine treatments. There have been seven COVID vaccines and eight COVID treatments. I’ll just check whether I’ve got the numbers for other medicines during that period. You’re talking about the provisional approval pathway?

Senator ROBERTS: Yes.

Dr Skerritt: From 1 July this year there have been five provisional approvals. From the period 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022 there have been 23. That would include those COVID treatments. What it does show is a lot of other medicines, such as cancer medicines, such as medicines for rare conditions, have also been approved. In the financial year 2021, from 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022, there were five. Over the period you’re talking about, that would add up to 33.

Therapeutic Goods Authority chief Professor John Skerritt under fire for allowing Pfizer’s toxic clot shot to kill and maim kids and adults

Senator ROBERTS: How many drugs have been approved under the normal process during that same period?

Dr Skerritt: During the same period? I will add the three financial years and I’ll check my mental arithmetic. So 36 this current financial year, and 117. These are either new approvals or new indications approved. And 95 the year before. So, it is a significant percentage, but not most of them.

Senator ROBERTS: Is the maximum provisional approval period six years because it can take that long to get drugs approved under the old approval system?

Dr Skerritt: A provisional approval is only valid for two years and then the company either has to come back and show why they cannot obtain all the data within the period and apply for an extension.

Senator ROBERTS: No, the maximum provisional approval?

Dr Skerritt: They can apply for further lots of two years.

Senator ROBERTS: Is the maximum provisional approval—

Dr Skerritt: Overall the maximum period is six years, but it’s not six years off the bat.

Senator ROBERTS: It’s two years with extensions.

Dr Skerritt: They are possible extensions; they’re not guaranteed.

Senator ROBERTS: How much money do you save pharmaceutical companies by switching from full approval to express approval? I understand it’s hundreds of millions per approval?

Dr Skerritt: It actually costs the pharmaceutical companies more in regulatory fees for provisional approval.

Senator ROBERTS: No, I didn’t say regulatory fees. How much are you saving the pharmaceutical companies by giving them express or provisional approval rather than going through the six-year period for getting proper approval?

Dr Skerritt: No, you’ve misinterpreted the system. It’s not a six-year period to get full regulatory approval.

Senator ROBERTS: It varies. I accept that.

Dr Skerritt: Most of our approvals are submitted as a standard approval, especially, for example, if it wasn’t a public health emergency or it’s a drug that already has others in the same category. They’re submitted as a standard approval.

Senator ROBERTS: Dedicated trials for their drugs, I understand, can be hundreds of millions of dollars. How much time and money would they save by going express?

Dr Skerritt: We would not give a provisional approval to a medicine unless there were clinical trials.

Senator ROBERTS: How much money does it save if they do a provisional without doing a formal or normal approval process? How much money does it save the drug company?

Dr Skerritt: I don’t believe there are necessarily savings. The situation would be different for every drug. It’s really important to emphasise there were very extensive clinical trials for the vaccines and treatments that have been through provisional approval.

Senator ROBERTS: My understanding is that it can cost hundreds of millions of dollars to get the full approval process. Without the dedicated trial, they could save hundreds of millions of dollars per drug?

Dr Skerritt: I don’t necessarily agree with you.

Senator ROBERTS: When does the provisional approval for Pfizer expire?

Dr Skerritt: The two-year period will be two years from the anniversary of the first approval. I would emphasise that in certain countries—

Senator ROBERTS: What is that date?

Dr Skerritt: The products are now fully approved.

Senator ROBERTS: What is the date of provisional approval expiry?

Dr Skerritt: For the very first approval, for 16 years and over, the two-year period finishes on 25 January 2023.

Senator ROBERTS: I have in front of me a document called the Australian Public Assessment Report for Tozinameran, from Comirnaty (Pfizer), dated December 2021. Is this the approval application for the paediatric version of the Pfizer vaccine?

Dr Skerritt: No, it is not. An Australian Public Assessment Report is a summary of the assessment that we did of the application. You mentioned Pfizer. The actual application is over 220,000 thousand pages of paper from Pfizer for that particular group of vaccines.

Senator ROBERTS: I reference page 61, which states:

Limitations of the current application data. Safety follow-up is currently limited to median 2.4 months post dose 2 in cohort 1, and 2.4 weeks for the safety expansion cohort.

What is the safety expansion cohort?

Dr Skerritt: Remember, also, this was going back to the time of approval. We now have hundreds of millions, actually more than a billion, people who have been vaccinated with that vaccine and experience going on since December 2020, when the first vaccination was done. The safety expansion cohort is in a clinical trial where individuals are monitored closely and the data reported back to regulators for periods of months, leading to years, after their vaccination.

Senator ROBERTS: Did you recommend this substance based on 2.4 weeks of safety testing or did you get more in? If so, over what period? How many months?

Dr Skerritt: Remember the initial approval from TGA was based on that two months of follow-up, but we also had the experience of other countries that had more than a month before starting mass vaccination campaigns. When we approved Pfizer on 25 January2021, we were in almost daily contact with the British, who by that stage had vaccinated millions of British people by 25 January 2021. Real-world evidence played a very important role in both the approvals and in the ongoing safety monitoring of these vaccines.

Senator ROBERTS: So you relied on data from other countries and you relied for periods of months, merely months. It can’t be more than six months, because there’s a gap between application and approval and to give time for collection of data and analysis. There should be years of data before we start putting this stuff into our children, yet it’s months.

Dr Skerritt: I disagree in the context of a pandemic and a public health crisis. Regulators globally felt that it was appropriate to do initial approvals—

Senator ROBERTS: You’re the Australian regulator.

Dr Skerritt: As the head of the Australian regulator, I would do precisely the same if I had my time again. The alternative would have been to leave Australians unvaccinated through the course of 2020, 2021 and 2022, and there would have been tens of thousands more Australian deaths.

Senator ROBERTS: Can I reference a letter from the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, signed by Radha Khiani, Director, Governance and Coordination section, in which the department makes this claim. The letter from 4 November 2022, just last week, states:

A large team of technical and clinical experts at the TGA carefully evaluated the data submitted by the sponsor. A treatment or vaccine is only provisionally approved if this rigorous process is completed.

This document concerned the use of Pfizer stages 2 to 3 cynical trial data in support of their application for provisional approval. Did the TGA check the stage 2 and stage 3 clinical trial data from Pfizer? Did you check it?

Dr Skerritt: We did check the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data from Pfizer and we also took it to independent external medical experts as well as consumer representatives.

Senator ROBERTS: Referencing Freedom of Information No. 2289, in which the applicant requested a copy of the stage 2 and stage 3 clinical trial data, the TGA responded that the ‘TGA does not hold any relevant documents relating to the request’. That was a request for stages 2 to 3 clinical trial data.

Dr Skerritt: Without seeing what’s in your hand, I believe that you asked for individual patient data rather than the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. I can give you my word that we assessed the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data; otherwise, what else did we do? Look at the colour of the label on the bottle? That is the main thing our team of several thousand clinicians look at in reviewing a new vaccine, the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. It is the centrepiece.

Senator ROBERTS: The freedom-of-information request then asked for ‘any documents confirming the process of analysing this data to a decision, including meetings, notes, dates and times’. Again the TGA replied, ‘We have no relevant documents.’ Did you review the stage 2 and stage 3 data or not, and, if you did, why did you tell this freedom-of-information applicant you did not have these documents? Which document is the lie? One of them is.

Dr Skerritt: I don’t have that document in front of me. We can review it on notice. But we reviewed the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data at length.

CHAIR: This really needs to be the last one so I can share the call.

Senator ROBERTS: I just want you to think about this and confirm it or otherwise: and ‘the trail data contained sufficient proof the vaccines were safe and effective, sufficient to meet the criteria for provisional approval’; is that correct?

Dr Skerritt: Correct. Yes.

Welcome to Country is divisive, patronising and promotes racial tension

by Cairns News contributors

Red flags are being raised over Prime Minister Albanese’s pledge to hold a referendum to include Aborigines in the Commonwealth Constitution of Australia.

Already indigenous bodies are drawing battle lines between supporters and those against a token gesture by the socialists of the Labor Party when Aborigines already are included in the Preamble of the Constitution:

WHEREAS the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania, humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and under the Constitution hereby established:

And whereas it is expedient to provide for the admission into the Commonwealth of other Australasian Colonies and possessions of the Queen:

Be it therefore enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:”

by Pauline Hanson

A great deal has been said this week about my leaving the Senate chamber as the ‘acknowledgement of country’ was recited.

A lot of it was predictable nonsense from the usual suspects. A lot of it was very supportive.

Real aboriginal stockmen branding cattle in the Northern Territory. These are real blackfellas, not the ‘coconuts’ referred to by full blood Aborigines. The ‘coconuts’ infest halls of power, control indigenous media and land councils. Real Aborigines say the ‘coconuts’ are dividing Australia for their own selfish means and denying any benefit to struggling communities.

Like many Australians, I’ve had enough of token gestures and symbolic nods to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people which do nothing to address the real disadvantages they continue to face. I’m sick and tired of being welcomed to my own country.

We’re all Australians, indigenous and otherwise, and we all share sovereign ownership of this country equally.

And like many Australians, I think these useless gestures only perpetuate racial division in our country. This week’s move to display the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags in Parliament was a step too far, and what prompted me to take a stand and leave the chamber that morning.

Senator Pauline Hanson correctly predicts the proposed Constitutional amendment to enshrine Aborigines will promote more racial division than ever before and unlikely to be carried in any case.

We are one people living in one nation under one flag – the Australian national flag. It’s the only flag which should be displayed in the seat of our democracy.

I’m never going to sit still in Parliament for an ‘acknowledgement of country’ again. I’m not going to recognise foreign flags displayed in Parliament. I’m never going to support an indigenous ‘voice to Parliament’ being enshrined in the Constitution. I will never support any idea or proposal which seeks to divide Australia on racial lines once again. That sort of thing was rightly consigned to the dustbin of history decades ago.

What I will do is continue to work with all Australians, especially Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, on the solutions which will end violence and poverty in indigenous communities and empower indigenous people to fully participate in the opportunities which come with living, learning and working in this great nation.

Watch Senator Hanson’s video on the acknowledgment of country protest…

WATCH HERE

Pauline says One Nation puts Australians first

Here we are on the eve of the Federal election and I’ve been blown away by the strong support our team has received all over Australia.

Pauline Hanson is standing candidates in every seat in Australia. Her policies will rejuvenate the ALP/LNP stagnation. She deserves support from struggling Australians.

To all of our candidates, volunteers, members and supporters: thank you from the bottom of my heart for all of your efforts. It’s been an amazing campaign.

Our policies on housing, immigration, apprenticeships, cheaper PBS medicines, climate, tax reform and family law reform are enjoying a lot of support, with the Coalition happily adopting some of them itself on housing, medicine and apprenticeships.

We’ll address the housing crisis. We’ll reduce demand for housing by lowering immigration, and increase the supply of housing by banning foreign ownership of residential property like New Zealand and Canada.

We’ll demand reforms to ensure foreign-owned multinationals pay their fair share of tax. We’ve achieved some reforms in family law but we have more work to do to make the child support system fairer. We’ll continue to back a national apprenticeship scheme to drive the creation of a skilled Australian workforce, and we’ll revitalise TAFE colleges and re-open agricultural colleges. We’ll reduce the cost of PBS-listed medicines.

We’re demanding a Royal Commission into the management of the COVID-19 pandemic by all Australian governments, and we’re also going to push for a comprehensive inquiry into climate science to ensure that Australian climate policy is based on evidence instead of ideology and scaremongering, destroying our economy and many thousands of Australian jobs.

One Nation puts Australia and Australians first. This election is your opportunity to vote for a strong One Nation contingent in Parliament to fight for your rights and freedoms, and fight for a fair, free and prosperous Australian nation.

Senator Pauline Hanson

Repudiate WHO Treaty, put the LNP/ALP/ Greens last

by Alison Ryan

Now is the time for “sovereign states to exercise the right to repudiate” the WHO Treaty on Pandemic, Preparedness and Response. We need therefore to make our vote count this election by voting for the freedom parties and putting the major parties – Libs, Labour, Nationals, and Greens – in the very last boxes. These have long sold us out to global governance, created illegitimate laws, and aided and abetted the demise of our common wealth.

Take a look at the history of the UN WHO Constitution and its tenets.

CONSTITUTION OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (1)

THE STATES Parties to this Constitution declare, in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations, that the following principles are basic to the happiness, harmonious relations and security of all peoples:

Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.

Pauline Hanson: Australia must get out of the United Nations

The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition.

The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security and is dependent upon the fullest co-operation of individuals and States.

The achievement of any State in the promotion and protection of health is of value to all.

Unequal development in different countries in the promotion of health and control of disease, especially communicable disease, is a common danger.

Healthy development of the child is of basic importance; the ability to live harmoniously in a changing total environment is essential to such development.

The extension to all peoples of the benefits of medical, psychological and related knowledge is essential to the fullest attainment of health.

Informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.

Governments have a responsibility for the health of their peoples which can be fulfilled only by the provision of adequate health and social measures.

ACCEPTING THESE PRINCIPLES, and for the purpose of co-operation among themselves and with others to promote and protect the health of all peoples, the Contracting Parties agree to the present Constitution and hereby establish the World Health Organization as a specialized agency within the terms of Article 57 of the Charter of the United Nations.
_________
(1) The Constitution was adopted by the International Health Conference held in New York from 19 June to 22 July 1946, signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Off. Rec. Wld Hlth Org., 2, 100), and entered into force on 7 April 1948.
Amendments adopted by the Twenty-sixth, Twenty-ninth, Thirty-ninth and Fifty-first World Health Assemblies (resolutions WHA26.37, WHA29.38, WHA39.6 and WHA51.23) came into force on 3 February 1977, 20 January 1984, 11 July 1994 and 15 September 2005
respectively and are incorporated in the present text.

Source: Basic documents: forty-ninth edition (including amendments adopted up to 31 May 2019), World Health Organization 2020, page 1

Annex 1
MEMBERS OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (at 31 May 2019)
The Members and Associate Members of the World Health Organization are listed below, with the date on which each became a party to the Constitution or the date of admission to associate membership.
Australia*……………………………………………………………. 2 February 1948
* Member States that have acceded to the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies and its Annex VII.

Source: Basic documents: forty-ninth edition (including amendments adopted up to 31 May 2019), World Health Organization 2020, page 227

See: Withdrawal from the United Nations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_from_the_United_Nations#cite_note-10

Proposed Australia withdrawal – Pauline Hanson’s One Nation support Australia leaving the United Nation.https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/one-nation-policies-the-definitive-guide-to-the-views-of-pauline-hanson-and-her-senators-20161017-gs3z1s.html

One Nations says; We are a party that stands for Australia and Australian values. We defend our constitution and stand up against global agendas for the individual rights and fundamental freedoms of all Australians.
https://www.onenation.org.au/

Palmer, Hanson, Katter, Newman go head-to-head from the Gold Coast in Paul Murray’s Live Pub Test

United Australia Party chairman Clive Palmer, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson, firebrand independent federal MP Bob Katter and Liberal Democrats senate candidate Campbell Newman have partaken in Paul Murray’s Live Pub Test.

They passed with flying colours.

These figureheads are four of Australia’s most colourful figures and have gone head-to-head in Paul Murray Live’s The Pub Test which put them in front of a live audience in an unscripted and televised Q&A format.

United Australia Party chairman Clive Palmer, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson, firebrand independent federal MP Bob Katter and Liberal Democrats senate candidate Campbell Newman answered questions from voters in the forum hosted by Sky News Australia’s Paul Murray.

Following the debate and Q&A, Murray was joined for analysis by Sky News Queensland Editor Peter Gleeson, Courier Mail editor Chris Jones and Senator Amanda Stoker.

“I’m thrilled to be announcing our ‘Paul Murray Live Pub Test: The Mavericks’ episode,” Murray said.#

Cairns News strongly supports these independent party leaders being the best of a bad bunch. We would also add Riccardo Bosi to this group and urge readers to get this video to everybody they know. Under no circumstances vote for LNP, Labor or Greens.

Be careful of ‘independents’ read story in Cairns News about Climate 200 supported candidates.

https://www.climate200.com.au/candidates

Watch out for GetUp and voter fraud. There is a story coming.

Senator Malcolm Roberts – Qld Labor destroys its own health system

Senator Malcolm Roberts giving Queensland Labor a serve for wrecking the state’s health system and destroying people’s lives and small business.

Defence Legislation Amendment will not allow foreign tanks to roll down Australian streets and be immune to liability

Last year the Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies) Bill was passed. Some have said it will allow foreign tanks to roll down Australian streets and be immune to liability. This is simply untrue. When reading all of the bill, we see that this is more about fighting bushfires than foreign troops and they DO NOT get immunity for any act of aggression against Australians. – from Senator Malcolm Roberts

Comrade Premier the heat in the kitchen is escalating, Redlands Shire says NO to your unlawful mandate. Bit close to home now

From Lyndsey Symonds

Last night the Redland Shire (southern bayside suburb not far from Brisbane) followed the lead of the Mareeba Shire. Big rally at the Cleveland Show Grounds – 1400 people with Pauline Hanson as the keynote speaker.

At 1 hour 06 mins. Pauline took the stand. She talked about her anti-mandate bill, argued that the vaccine mandates are against the constitution, brought down the house when she stated that the Scomo government has “pushed the premiers into doing his dirty work”.. Wild applause and standing ovation: “I am an Australian and I am standing up for my rights.” Big favourite in the Redlands.

The rally also heard from Dr. Robert Brennan, a ‘struck-off’ doctor from the CoVID Medical Network. He told the rally “this is a behavioural training program for the Social Credit System and digital ID / currency of the world order.” Also “the data from the UK, from Iceland, from Gibraltar and Israel is now in.”

The countries with the highest vaxx rates are the countries with the highest ‘covid’ cases – which are the adverse reactions and all the diseases are the vaccines themselves. They cannot hide it.

Pauline lost all credibility

Cairnsnews could be forgiven for missing something here. We got a media release claiming One Nation senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts would be opposing all government bills in the senate unless the vaccine mandates were stopped.

Pauline Hanson supported a Liberal motion to kill off the integrity commission for politicians after claiming she would no longer support any Liberal bills until Covid mandates were stopped.

Pauline’s own bill to halt mandates was defeated yesterday in the senate by the duopoly LNP and Labor (naturally) and some of the token independents such as mad woman Jacquie Lambie..

Today there is an article by the ABC that Hanson and Roberts sided with the LNP Government voting down the establishment of an Integrity Commission for federal politicians.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-23/pauline-hanson-government-block-federal-icac-bill/100643150?

This blatant hypocrisy enhances the perception of many people that Pauline remains a true Liberal. Good luck Clive.

What more can we say?

Comment from James Ashby, Pauline Hanson’s Chief of Staff:

One Nation have committed to vote against all Government legislation until the Prime Minister removes the states ability to mandate COVID vaccines. While One Nation support the merits of a National ICAC, the Bill that went before the Senate today did not meet the requirements set by both One Nation Senators, and therefore they voted against it. If the Liberals voted the same way – that’s their choice. Neither One Nation Senator voted for the Government.

– contributed

Hanson asks Alan Jones to run in the senate for One Nation

By now many of you have probably heard that Sky News will not be renewing the contract of Alan Jones.

Sky News had to get rid of Alan Jones because he was cutting too close to the bone with regards to COVID.

Anyone who speaks against government’s handling and mandating of jabs has to be shut down. How much influence does Pfizer have over Sky?

Pauline Hanson asks Alan Jones to run in the senate. She asks how much influence Pfizer has over Sky News in light of the Pfizer bribery allegations raised by Clive Palmer a month ago involving the disgraced former NSW Premier

Alan has done a wonderful job keeping Australians well informed and offering a difference of opinion which is now being taken away from us.

It disheartening to see where our country is headed.

This is why I have asked Alan to stand for the Senate in NSW under the banner of One Nation.

We need more people of his calibre and intestinal fortitude to join me on the floor of parliament.

We can’t roll over, it is up to us to continue fighting for our rights and our democracy.

I know the people will back him. We all realise he still has very much to offer. – from Pauline Hanson

Craig Kelly needs support for his ‘No Domestic Covid Vaccination Passports bill 2021’

This is not vax vs anti-vax, this is not state vs state, this is human rights. Do you want to ask the government permission to go see your Mum who lives in another state or never travel to another state because they’ve decided your not allowed in.

We need our rights and freedom back, we can use our numbers, lets use people power. We all need to get involved for it to work. Please take this seriously and take a few minutes to help protect your rights, protect the children’s future!

Craig Kelly Introducing the Bill for ‘No domestic COVID vaccination passports 2021’ 
https://youtu.be/6J9XMLNfrXM

Letter to your Senator template and your local Senator look up
https://www.australiannationalreview.com/state-of-affairs/email-template-to-request-our-federal-representatives-to-support-craig-kellys-bill-for-no-vax-passport

Local senator look up; 
https://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members

You can copy the Template Letter from directly below (same as one in link above) add your own details (senators details at the top your name at the bottom).
Note – make it your own; take or add what you like/belief, we are individuals and have our own beliefs so please express your beliefs as i said we are talking about protecting our Human Rights with this Bill, Covid is just the easy fear tactic for us (Australian’s/Humanity) to not fight for our ‘rights’ and freely give up our birth right of ‘freedom’ to move uninhibited around our big beautiful country we all love so much. Fight for Australia, fight for our freedom and fight for our future generations freedom. 

To ____ the Federal member for _____

I’m writing to you as a concerned constituent, as I am deeply disturbed by the prospect of limited travel under the introduction of domestic vaccine passports.

Restricting travel as a means of coercing the population of Australia into receiving a vaccine that is still in it’s trial phases is extremely unethical, and I’m of the firm belief that to do so is a gross violation of our civil liberties and medical autonomy.

To restrict our freedom of movement in exchange for a medical procedure or otherwise goes against:

  • The Universal declaration of human rights – article 13
  • The Australian human rights commission – article 12

and

  • The Australian Commonwealth Constitution – section 92

Covid-19 vaccines have somehow breezed through the system without TGA approval under rushed emergency legislation with no scientific transparency, and I’m disgusted that our federal government would consider restricting our freedom of movement as a means of coercing Australians into accepting a substance that has not yet been proven safe or effective.

To restrict Australian’s from interstate or intrastate travel is an outrageous violation of our human rights, and completely disproportionate to the objective of effectively managing covid-19.

It is completely unnecessary and wildly unethical to coerce Australian’s into making a medical decision without so much as a standard TGA approval.

In light of this information, I strongly urge you as one of your constituents to uphold the Australian people’s right to choose and vote in favour of Craig Kelly’s ‘No Domestic Vaccine Passports Bill 2021’.

If you choose not to protect our rights as Australians as a priority going forward, you will leave me no choice but to vote against you in the next election.

Yours faithfully,

Joe Bloggs

Looney Greens try to stifle Hanson’s speech about corruption in the Aboriginal industry

by Senator Pauline Hanson

Today I attempted to use my Senate time to have the issue of the abuse and corruption that is rife in the indigenous industry debated in the Senate.

Sadly, the Greens decided to use every procedural trick in the book to run down the clock and silence debate, as you will see if you watch this video.

This is an important issue that has been swept under the rug by all sides of politics for too long.

It’s a shame that there are those in other parties who are too afraid to hear the truth about what is going on.

You can read my prepared remarks in full below. This is what the Greens didn’t want you to be able to hear.

***

Pauline Hanson says it’s time to get some accountability in the annual $35 billion Aboriginal industry

I rise to bring to the attention of Senators and the people of Australia, yet again, the inequality that exists in the funding of Indigenous programs and the continuing desperate circumstances of the victims of this financial bastardry and mismanagement.

I learned of this in my many conversations over the years with indigenous communities across Australia.

Unlike many vocal urban aboriginal elites, I have walked through the streets of remote Aboriginal communities in Queensland, the Northern Territory, South Australia and Western Australia.

And I’ve listened.

And I understand.

Whether it’s sitting on the beach with Mullawop on Thursday Island or Jimpoona and her family at the base of Uluru. Just being in remote communities listening to elders and residents have been profound and very informative. There’s not one indigenous community I’ve met with that isn’t concerned and they want to share what’s going wrong.

A lot of these people can’t even gain access to their own land which has in many cases been given back to the registered native title bodies corporate which are often more restrictive than the government was.

Many of these Bodies, especially in more remote areas are highly restrictive to the detriment of the aboriginal people.

Some are charged to go on their ancestral land or worse still some are denied access altogether.

But those conversations in both the large communities and in remote locations, always turn to the needs that their isolation and situation brings.

  • Needs reflected in a lack of adequate housing,
  • A deficiency of infrastructure,
  • Widespread alcoholism,
  • Out-of-control levels of domestic violence,
  • Repeated sexual abuse – including of young children,
  • And a lack of effective pathways to escape the cycles of poverty and

unemployment that are often normalised and passed on from

generation to generation.

Those communities live on the other side of what the highly respected Indigenous spokesperson, Jacinta Price, referred to in the Australian newspaper recently as ‘the kasm’.

She described in detail how the aboriginal elite, the activists, the academics from the indoctrination centres posing as universities, those with their hands out for grant money, those with the loudest voices who want to change the date of Australia Day – they all live in the city – on their side of the kasm.

When was the last time you heard one of the members of the Elite in this place saying anything positive or uplifting about indigenous achievements? When was the last time you heard one of the activists who identifies as indigenous talk up the efforts of those in remote locations working to succeed?

The Elites, the truth deniers, they know there’s a multitude of ways to end the misery.

They know there’s a ton of money being poured into programs.

Read the rest of this entry

%d bloggers like this: