Category Archives: One Nation

Treasurer Jim Chalmers, a Paul Keating clone, proposes more inflation, more wealth reduction, more unemployment and more misery

from Senator Malcolm Roberts

In a recent economic essay released for weekend newspapers, Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers has cobbled together some cliches about how best to run the world’s 13th largest economy. To summarise, it is a blueprint on how to destroy a $1.3 trillion dollar economy. Of course, Doctor Chalmers has learnt from a master at economic shrinkage, his PhD dissertation was on the economic and social legacy of Paul Keating.

Unfortunately for the Treasurer, his blueprint was released on a weekend when news hit that his tax on beer is set to rise sending the price of beer towards $12 a schooner. Just for the record though, and I’ll get to details soon, Chalmer’s blue print will surely classify your beer as a ‘bad’ investment, because it is full of carbon. Prices will get even higher.

Senator Roberts warns ALP policies of’ ‘çlimate taxonomy’ is sending inflation sky high and will finish off the faltering economy

We have to take our hats off to the spin doctor in the Treasurer’s office who released the essay to coincide with the increase in beer prices. 

Schooners of beer are exactly what the Treasurer’s blueprint boils down to. Prices of goods are inflating exponentially, and it is the main topic for discussion at kitchen tables right across Australia. Families are now having to choose between new school shoes or eating; getting the roof fixed or having a holiday at the beach.

A basket of goods that only cost $100 in 1990 set you back $217 in 2022. With sky high inflation, that $100 basket now costs us an eye-watering $234 in 2023, a nearly 8% increase in just one year. Unfortunately, prices will continue to go up. Much of Australia’s price rises in groceries and the bills we can’t avoid are even worse than the headline inflation rate.

Meanwhile in Canberra, the Treasurer is writing new short stories about how to add more pressure to our inflation cooked economy and what he can do to make life even harder for Australians.

Chalmers references the polycrisis of converging pressures. What we really have though in Australia is a pollie-crisis, due to politicians in Canberra making terrible decisions.

Australia’s inflation hasn’t been this high since the Keating days. Families should be terrified, because for those of us who can remember, Paul Keating sent mortgages to 19% and much of the country went broke.

Treasurer Chalmers is a Keating addict whose PhD was on the economic and social legacy of Paul Keating and his trademark 19% mortgages

The Treasurer’s neo-Marxist catch-phrase ‘sustainable finance architecture, including a new taxonomy’ to label the climate impact of different investments, has been a topic of much discussion in recent years. Soviet extremists on the left argue that this system is necessary for their fight in the climate change scam and promoting ‘sustainability’. Others, including One Nation, argue that it is misguided and ultimately harmful to economic growth and people’s prosperity.

First and foremost, using a ‘new’ taxonomy to label the climate impact of different investments is the worst and most damaging form imaginable of government intervention in the market. In short, Chalmers says he wants to classify all investments made, including in your superannuation, into ‘good’ and ‘bad’. Ergo, beer full of carbon will be a ‘bad’ investment and need a higher price, while a tree (which is actually made of carbon like much of everything else) will be ‘good’.

This market intervention is the most serious and concerning idea that a government has offered since Ben Chiefly dabbled with communism in the late 1940’s.

The federal government classifying an Aussie family’s assets into ‘good’ and ‘bad’ is a terrifying intervention. Firstly, it creates a level of uncertainty for investors, including you, as they may be unsure of how investments will be classified under the new system. Labor has a track record of changing the goal posts at any minute to suit any Greens, union or factional deal on the table. The classification system is purely subjective and cannot be based on evidence or data.

Secondly, it will lead to market distortions, as certain investments are favoured over others simply because of their classification as good or bad, rather than any economic, financial or productive merit. This will lead to a misallocation of resources, as investments that may not be the most economically efficient or profitable are chosen simply because they are classified as more ‘environmentally’ friendly. For example “this model of car (an Electric Vehicle) is ‘good’, while that diesel 4WD is ‘bad’”, even though Australia is not a country suitable nor ready for the forced uptake of 100% electric vehicles in any way.

The good or bad decisions are made based on the Treasurer’s mood as he gets out of bed in the morning. It is simply a chaotic system that is being proposed.  The Soviet-level bureaucracy necessary to write, disseminate and enforce this controlled economy will result in significantly higher taxes and lower economic growth – an inevitable result of bigger government. Higher taxes and debt will continue to be the Labor way.

Not even the Treasurer Jim Chalmers can afford a $12 schooner thanks to his own policies which affect ALP voters much more than any others

These plans will trash our economy. When the Government tries to pick winners, the country loses.

All realistic thinkers will reject and debunk the idea that we can accurately classify and label the ‘climate impact’ of different investments . Any policy setting Australia makes with the aim to ‘adjust’ the world temperature will barely be a drop in the ocean, even if you believe we need to do anything, which the science clearly says is neither necessary nor possible.

The emphasis on ‘sustainable finance’ and labelling the climate impact of different investments as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ misses the point that the issue confronting Australians is inflation and a lack of economic advancement. Controlling and directing the economy to favour only climate-friendly projects from ALP donors will not deal with inflation. Instead, concentrating economic power in the hands of a woke few, it will increase inflation.

One Nation proposes, and has always advocated for, systemic economic reform with the primary objective of reducing government waste to reduce the tax burden on families and eliminate government debt.

If Australians think it’s a rough deal that the Treasurer must raise tax on beer this weekend because beer is ‘bad’, they are best reminded that the cost of beer will be small fry compared to other cost of living pressures Chalmers will soon unleash.

The Treasurer can take away one important lesson from this battle, One Nation will fight the Labor party every step of the way. We will fight for lower prices, better working conditions and a safer economy. The Liberals may have abandoned the field to socialism, but we haven’t. When I ran on as a rugby and league halfback as a teenager and young adult, the job was clear; get that ball and drive it up the middle.

So Labor had better realise it won’t get away with trashing the economy just because of a fractious, demoralised Liberal party destined to become totally irrelevant. The Australian political landscape is now far more pluralistic as One Nation’s continuing growth demonstrates.

The Orwellian use of catch phrases like ‘sustainable finance architecture’ and a ‘new taxonomy’ to label the ‘climate impact of different investments’ is designed to hoodwink the public while winning back Labor’s Green voters, who already exist in this world of doublespeak and concocted reality.

Chalmers is proposing an unnecessary and frightening intervention in our economy that has already been screwed over thanks to years of government COVID restrictions. These measures have had questionable impact on our health, and have certainly decimated our economic well-being. Investors can no longer invest with certainty. Banks have introduced their own version of the Treasurer’s “worthiness” index that is forcing the closure of critical industries in mining, agriculture and manufacturing.

Chalmers is promising more of the same. More wealth reduction, more employment loss, more unemployment and more misery for everyday Australians.

One Nation is having none of this Soviet-style economic management. Let businesses get on with what they do best – creating jobs, creating wealth, and creating a future for workers and for all everyday Australians.

In our beautiful country the best method of providing a future for everyone has always been personal enterprise.

Climate Change legislation deadly for Australian economy as the continent’s tree density is at all time highs from natural CO2 plant food

Senator Malcolm continues his unique research as a statesman of the senate representing the majority and warns the party duopoly about destroying 30,000 jobs in coal industry and the exorbitant cost of solar, wind power and batteries.

Ït is a joke,”he said.

“Blackouts will be the new normal.

“The senate is actually voting on nuclear power.”

WHA and UN hitting roadblocks over planned health takeover of member nations

Australia a vocal supporter, no back down from our delegates

by Stephen Andrew, MP, Mirani, May 30, 2022

Brilliant news out of Geneva today!

As most of you know, the World Health Assembly has spent the past 7 days considering Biden’s 13 controversial amendments to the International Health Regulations.

Official delegates from wealthy developed nations like Australia, the UK, and the US spoke in strong support of the amendments and urged other states to join them in signing away their countries’ sovereignty.

One Nation MP Stephen Andrew leads the way in Qld Parliament exposing the attempted UN takeover of Australian sovereignty

The first sign, however, that things might not be going the globalists’ way, came on Wednesday, the 25th of May, which just happened to also be Africa Day.

Botswana read a statement on behalf of its 47 AFRO members, saying they would be collectively withholding their support for the ‘reforms’, which many African members were very concerned about.

Multiple other countries also said they had reservations over the changes and would not be supporting them either.

These included Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran and Malaysia. Brazil in particular said it would exit WHO altogether, rather than allow its population to be made subject to the new amendments.

In the end, the WHO and its wealthy nation supporters were forced to back down.

They have not given up though – far from it. Instead, they did what they always do and ‘pivoted’.

At their request, a new working group was convened to make “technical recommendations on the proposed amendments” which will be re-submitted along with the Pandemic Treaty, at the 77th Health Assembly meeting in 2024.

There has also been lots of pushback from Republicans in the US, with a number of them introducing new bills giving the US Congress/Senate powers to override any WHO mandates or directives issued as part of any international agreements.

One, called the ‘No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act’ has 15 co-sponsors and was introduced to the Senate on Thursday by Republican Senator Ron Johnson, who said “The sovereignty of the United States is not negotiable”.

Here in Australia, we need to keep the pressure up on our own parliaments, both Federal AND State, up the ante, and don’t ever look sideways.

Just brace for the digital ID now, and as the Federal Parliament reboots we need to push back at all costs on that from this week moving forwards.

I urge everyone who has not already done so, to sign and share my Queensland Parliament Petition on the IHR Amendments and Pandemic Treaty (link below).

Click here for Link to Queensland ePetition: Pandemic Treaty and Amendments to the International Health Regulations

Source: Stephen Andrew MP for Mirani Facebook

Pauline says One Nation puts Australians first

Here we are on the eve of the Federal election and I’ve been blown away by the strong support our team has received all over Australia.

Pauline Hanson is standing candidates in every seat in Australia. Her policies will rejuvenate the ALP/LNP stagnation. She deserves support from struggling Australians.

To all of our candidates, volunteers, members and supporters: thank you from the bottom of my heart for all of your efforts. It’s been an amazing campaign.

Our policies on housing, immigration, apprenticeships, cheaper PBS medicines, climate, tax reform and family law reform are enjoying a lot of support, with the Coalition happily adopting some of them itself on housing, medicine and apprenticeships.

We’ll address the housing crisis. We’ll reduce demand for housing by lowering immigration, and increase the supply of housing by banning foreign ownership of residential property like New Zealand and Canada.

We’ll demand reforms to ensure foreign-owned multinationals pay their fair share of tax. We’ve achieved some reforms in family law but we have more work to do to make the child support system fairer. We’ll continue to back a national apprenticeship scheme to drive the creation of a skilled Australian workforce, and we’ll revitalise TAFE colleges and re-open agricultural colleges. We’ll reduce the cost of PBS-listed medicines.

We’re demanding a Royal Commission into the management of the COVID-19 pandemic by all Australian governments, and we’re also going to push for a comprehensive inquiry into climate science to ensure that Australian climate policy is based on evidence instead of ideology and scaremongering, destroying our economy and many thousands of Australian jobs.

One Nation puts Australia and Australians first. This election is your opportunity to vote for a strong One Nation contingent in Parliament to fight for your rights and freedoms, and fight for a fair, free and prosperous Australian nation.

Senator Pauline Hanson

Repudiate WHO Treaty, put the LNP/ALP/ Greens last

by Alison Ryan

Now is the time for “sovereign states to exercise the right to repudiate” the WHO Treaty on Pandemic, Preparedness and Response. We need therefore to make our vote count this election by voting for the freedom parties and putting the major parties – Libs, Labour, Nationals, and Greens – in the very last boxes. These have long sold us out to global governance, created illegitimate laws, and aided and abetted the demise of our common wealth.

Take a look at the history of the UN WHO Constitution and its tenets.

CONSTITUTION OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (1)

THE STATES Parties to this Constitution declare, in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations, that the following principles are basic to the happiness, harmonious relations and security of all peoples:

Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.

Pauline Hanson: Australia must get out of the United Nations

The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition.

The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security and is dependent upon the fullest co-operation of individuals and States.

The achievement of any State in the promotion and protection of health is of value to all.

Unequal development in different countries in the promotion of health and control of disease, especially communicable disease, is a common danger.

Healthy development of the child is of basic importance; the ability to live harmoniously in a changing total environment is essential to such development.

The extension to all peoples of the benefits of medical, psychological and related knowledge is essential to the fullest attainment of health.

Informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.

Governments have a responsibility for the health of their peoples which can be fulfilled only by the provision of adequate health and social measures.

ACCEPTING THESE PRINCIPLES, and for the purpose of co-operation among themselves and with others to promote and protect the health of all peoples, the Contracting Parties agree to the present Constitution and hereby establish the World Health Organization as a specialized agency within the terms of Article 57 of the Charter of the United Nations.
_________
(1) The Constitution was adopted by the International Health Conference held in New York from 19 June to 22 July 1946, signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Off. Rec. Wld Hlth Org., 2, 100), and entered into force on 7 April 1948.
Amendments adopted by the Twenty-sixth, Twenty-ninth, Thirty-ninth and Fifty-first World Health Assemblies (resolutions WHA26.37, WHA29.38, WHA39.6 and WHA51.23) came into force on 3 February 1977, 20 January 1984, 11 July 1994 and 15 September 2005
respectively and are incorporated in the present text.

Source: Basic documents: forty-ninth edition (including amendments adopted up to 31 May 2019), World Health Organization 2020, page 1

Annex 1
MEMBERS OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (at 31 May 2019)
The Members and Associate Members of the World Health Organization are listed below, with the date on which each became a party to the Constitution or the date of admission to associate membership.
Australia*……………………………………………………………. 2 February 1948
* Member States that have acceded to the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies and its Annex VII.

Source: Basic documents: forty-ninth edition (including amendments adopted up to 31 May 2019), World Health Organization 2020, page 227

See: Withdrawal from the United Nations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_from_the_United_Nations#cite_note-10

Proposed Australia withdrawal – Pauline Hanson’s One Nation support Australia leaving the United Nation.https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/one-nation-policies-the-definitive-guide-to-the-views-of-pauline-hanson-and-her-senators-20161017-gs3z1s.html

One Nations says; We are a party that stands for Australia and Australian values. We defend our constitution and stand up against global agendas for the individual rights and fundamental freedoms of all Australians.
https://www.onenation.org.au/

Former Senator Len Harris exposes the extinguishing and shredding of all freehold title deeds by Labor Government

Comrade Premier the heat in the kitchen is escalating, Redlands Shire says NO to your unlawful mandate. Bit close to home now

From Lyndsey Symonds

Last night the Redland Shire (southern bayside suburb not far from Brisbane) followed the lead of the Mareeba Shire. Big rally at the Cleveland Show Grounds – 1400 people with Pauline Hanson as the keynote speaker.

At 1 hour 06 mins. Pauline took the stand. She talked about her anti-mandate bill, argued that the vaccine mandates are against the constitution, brought down the house when she stated that the Scomo government has “pushed the premiers into doing his dirty work”.. Wild applause and standing ovation: “I am an Australian and I am standing up for my rights.” Big favourite in the Redlands.

The rally also heard from Dr. Robert Brennan, a ‘struck-off’ doctor from the CoVID Medical Network. He told the rally “this is a behavioural training program for the Social Credit System and digital ID / currency of the world order.” Also “the data from the UK, from Iceland, from Gibraltar and Israel is now in.”

The countries with the highest vaxx rates are the countries with the highest ‘covid’ cases – which are the adverse reactions and all the diseases are the vaccines themselves. They cannot hide it.

Pauline lost all credibility

Cairnsnews could be forgiven for missing something here. We got a media release claiming One Nation senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts would be opposing all government bills in the senate unless the vaccine mandates were stopped.

Pauline Hanson supported a Liberal motion to kill off the integrity commission for politicians after claiming she would no longer support any Liberal bills until Covid mandates were stopped.

Pauline’s own bill to halt mandates was defeated yesterday in the senate by the duopoly LNP and Labor (naturally) and some of the token independents such as mad woman Jacquie Lambie..

Today there is an article by the ABC that Hanson and Roberts sided with the LNP Government voting down the establishment of an Integrity Commission for federal politicians.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-23/pauline-hanson-government-block-federal-icac-bill/100643150?

This blatant hypocrisy enhances the perception of many people that Pauline remains a true Liberal. Good luck Clive.

What more can we say?

Comment from James Ashby, Pauline Hanson’s Chief of Staff:

One Nation have committed to vote against all Government legislation until the Prime Minister removes the states ability to mandate COVID vaccines. While One Nation support the merits of a National ICAC, the Bill that went before the Senate today did not meet the requirements set by both One Nation Senators, and therefore they voted against it. If the Liberals voted the same way – that’s their choice. Neither One Nation Senator voted for the Government.

– contributed

Hanson asks Alan Jones to run in the senate for One Nation

By now many of you have probably heard that Sky News will not be renewing the contract of Alan Jones.

Sky News had to get rid of Alan Jones because he was cutting too close to the bone with regards to COVID.

Anyone who speaks against government’s handling and mandating of jabs has to be shut down. How much influence does Pfizer have over Sky?

Pauline Hanson asks Alan Jones to run in the senate. She asks how much influence Pfizer has over Sky News in light of the Pfizer bribery allegations raised by Clive Palmer a month ago involving the disgraced former NSW Premier

Alan has done a wonderful job keeping Australians well informed and offering a difference of opinion which is now being taken away from us.

It disheartening to see where our country is headed.

This is why I have asked Alan to stand for the Senate in NSW under the banner of One Nation.

We need more people of his calibre and intestinal fortitude to join me on the floor of parliament.

We can’t roll over, it is up to us to continue fighting for our rights and our democracy.

I know the people will back him. We all realise he still has very much to offer. – from Pauline Hanson

One Nation placed second on Katter how to vote cards

The Katter’s Australian Party and One Nation have announced they will place each other as the number two position on their how to vote cards in an alliance to reflect the major party neglect of Queensland.

KAP leader Robbie Katter said the Liberal and Labor major party dominance had clearly failed regional Queenslanders and that the time was now for much needed change.

“For far two long the major parties have continued to sell off our assets, pushed green ideology and failed to invest in regional job creating mega-infrastructure projects,” Mr Katter said.

Robbie Katter has placed One Nation second on KAP how to vote cards after the Liberal National Party announced it would preference Greens ahead of Labor

“Queensland can’t afford another four years of major party dominance, we know it doesn’t work, enough is enough, times up.”

Mr Katter said the KAP would put the Greens last in all seats.

“The LNP are preferencing the Greens which highlights how out of touch they have become.

“If there is a result of the LNP deal that ends up with a Greens controlled government this looks like no dams, no coal and more crime.

“We can’t risk the Greens grabbing a seat, it’s a major threat to the future of North Queensland.”

Mr Katter said the only way the majors can learn their lesson is that if people don’t give them their vote.

“Both the LNP and Labor are Brisbane based parties and the evidence of this is beyond clear,” he said.

“Up here in the north the LNP they say they are pro coal, yet down in Brisbane they tell everyone they are anti-coal, the truth is they are preferencing the Greens and they can’t have a bet each way.

“Ultimately our preferences are up to the voter, the how to vote card is just a guide.”

Mr Katter said other Westminster democracies who had more than a duopoly party dominance had a better governance of their citizens.

“Stronger minor parties means politicians have to actually fight for your vote in order to make a difference.”

The Liberals are after you bank deposits – no cash transactions over $10,000 or go to jail

from CEC, Melbourne

After ramming his $10,000 cash ban law through the House of Representatives last week, Scott Morrison is now trying to pretend he has responded to concerns about his cash ban, by releasing a set of “rules” that exempt many activities from the ban.

(This legislation is yet to clear the senate.Ed)

Shane Wright reported in the 28 October Sydney Morning Herald: “The Morrison government has sought to head off internal and crossbench anger over plans to forbid cash payments of $10,000 or more, outlining a string of exclusions it says will protect those who still want to use notes and cents.

“Rules governing new laws around large cash payments make it clear they will exclude gifts, private transactions such as used car sales and situations where people have no other way to pay but via cash.”

The Liberal party is after your bank deposits. Scott Morrison’s legislation to outlaw cash transactions over $10,000 or go to jail, will see their demise at the next election. However will the Labor Party follow the IMF direction to make us a cashless society?

It is not true that Morrison is softening the law with these rules. They were always planned to be attached to the law, as a ploy to make the ban initially more acceptable.

The problem is that all the rules providing exemptions to the cash ban are in a separate legislative instrument, and not in the bill itself. This means that the Minister can change the rules at any time, without a vote in Parliament. While the Parliament can disallow the Minister’s changes, it has a strict time limit on doing so, which limits the ability of the public to have a say in the changes and gives the Minister the advantage in making changes.

In other words, the rules are not real protections at all, but exemptions that can be temporary, and easily removed to make the ban more draconian.

The bill itself, which does require a parliamentary vote to change, is an absolute ban on all transactions over $10,000.

Even the ‘myths’ are lies

Demonstrating how disingenuous the government is being over this law, Treasury has issued a “Fact Sheet—addressing the myths about the cash payment limit”.

The so-called “myths” listed in the fact sheet have nothing to do with the main objections to the law.

The Government’s “myths” are:

  • Cash cannot be used for everyday transactions.
  • Family members cannot give cash gifts.
  • Private individuals cannot buy or sell second-hand goods using cash.
  • People are required to store money in the bank.
  • People are no longer able to deposit or withdraw cash from their bank account.
  • The Government can amend the Bill for the cash limit without scrutiny by the Senate.

In denying all these claims, the government fails to mention that they are only false because they are exempted under the rules, which can be changed at any time. They are not exempted in the legislation, which requires a Parliamentary vote to change. As independent researcher Melissa Harrison from exposingtheblackeconomyreport.com asked: “Why is the government not being upfront about this?”

Click here to read Melissa Harrison’s Fact Check of the Fact Sheet.

The government’s fact sheet doesn’t address the main objections to the law, because the government cannot answer them. They prove the government’s excuses for this law to be false.

The government claims the cash ban is necessary to eliminate the black economy and reduce tax evasion.

In truth, as proven by studies of the global black economy by Leandro Medina and Friedrich Schneider published by the IMF, Australia doesn’t have a serious black economy problem; the black economy we do have is already shrinking without any cash ban, having halved since 1991; and comparable countries with cash restrictions have much bigger black economies.

As for tax evasion, it is false to blame tax evasion on individuals using cash. Real tax evasion is perpetrated on a massive scale by multinational corporations and banks, and ultra-rich individuals, using the Big Four global accounting firms and the global network of offshore tax havens. This is how Netflix can pay less than $500,000 tax in Australia, on revenue of almost a billion dollars. It is especially outrageous that this cash ban was recommended by a former global boss of one of the Big Four accounting firms, KPMG, which is up to its ears in real tax evasion, and that KPMG is already lobbying to reduce the limit from $10,000 to $2,000.

It is now proven that the real reason for the cash ban, which the government doesn’t want to acknowledge, is not a “conspiracy theory”, but is a recommendation from the IMF which can be read in black and white: cash must be restricted to make negative interest rates work. Countries all over the world are either at negative interest rates or close to, and the IMF has recommended cash restrictions to trap people in banks so they are forced to pay the banks to look after their money.

Another reason to trap people in banks is so they cannot escape “bail-in”, which is when deposits are seized to prop up failing banks.

Independent MP Andrew Wilkie cited this evidence, including the need to ban cash to make negative interest rates work, in his speech in Parliament on 24 October opposing the cash ban. He also proved that the government is not interested in really eliminating money laundering, as it has ignored Wilkie’s evidence of money laundering at Crown Casino. Most importantly, Wilkie made the point that the government has all the laws it needs to crack down on the real black economy, it just doesn’t enforce them.

The government is trying to dodge the issue because of the huge backlash it has received against this law, which has sparked a mutiny even within its own Liberal Party ranks. We must keep the heat on!

What you can do:

  1. Most importantly, make a submission to the Senate inquiry by 15 November. (Click here if you need help.)
  2. Call the CEC on 1800 636 432 to join a delegation to see MPs.
  3. Sign the cash ban petition and share the new website stopthecashban.com.au.

Aljazeera spy Rodger Muller’s wife arrested for fraud

Today Cairnsnews received information from a One Nation source in NSW that the wife of Aljazeera Muslim spy Rodger Muller had been charged by police with 46 fraud offences.

Muller is the scumbag who released the covert footage of One Nation members Steve Dickson and James Ashby aided and abetted by the left-wing of the ABC Four Corners program which broadcast the private conversations of private people at a social gathering, being representatives of a political party.

Readers have asked how long Muslim spy and Islamic sycophant Rodger Muller will survive after his shocking betrayal of friends and politicians.

In talks with the National Rifle Association in the US, the two One Nation members were secretly recorded by Muller while asking the NRA for a donation. Big deal. Its a shame they didn’t get it. They might have been able to get rid of the ABC and Greens.

During WW2 spying for the enemy attracted the death penalty in Commonwealth countries, US, Germany and Japan. This grub should get the same treatment.

If Mrs Muller has had her fingers in a till somewhere then ten to one her husband Rodger would be aware of her crimes.

Aljazeera is a company owned by the Saudi Government therefore the operative Mueller is an agent of a foreign government and should be prosecuted by Australian authorities as such.

The hypocritical outpouring of rage by politicians is remarkable because the Liberal and Labor Parties get millions in donations every year from international banks, insurance companies, mining companies, media conglomerates(Newsltd) and a host of other donors.

George Soros backing GetUp thus the ALP and Greens

Not forgetting the communist, activist organisation  GetUp started in Australia by Labor Opposition Leader Bill Shorten on whose board he used to sit.

GetUp is well known for getting substantial financial support from the left wing money market manipulator and billionaire George Soros.

Soros and Hilary Clinton  have financed a number of dissident mobs in the US trying to bring down President Trump.

 

%d bloggers like this: