Category Archives: MSM
Liz Gunn – Letter To Jacinda
One year on from the invasion of Freedom Village at Parliament, here is our “homage” to the woman who sanctioned the police brutalising of gentle Kiwis.
Arrogant TGA head Dr John Skerritt ducks for cover as Roberts accuses him of vaccine impropriety
Federal Police should be investigating Professor John Skerrit’s onshore and offshore bank accounts. Former PM Scott Morrison accrued $52 Million while PM. How much has Bro John salted away? (https://cairnsnews.org/2022/02/23/scott-morrison-under-the-microscope/)
Senator ROBERTS: Can you tell me how many medicines were approved under the provisional approval pathway during the COVID period 1 July 2020 to date? My numbers are 13 vaccines and six drugs; is that correct?
Dr Skerritt: Are you talking specifically about COVID treatments and COVID vaccines?
Senator ROBERTS: No, any vaccines or drugs that have been approved using the provisional pathway.
Dr Skerritt: I will start with COVID vaccine treatments. There have been seven COVID vaccines and eight COVID treatments. I’ll just check whether I’ve got the numbers for other medicines during that period. You’re talking about the provisional approval pathway?
Senator ROBERTS: Yes.
Dr Skerritt: From 1 July this year there have been five provisional approvals. From the period 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022 there have been 23. That would include those COVID treatments. What it does show is a lot of other medicines, such as cancer medicines, such as medicines for rare conditions, have also been approved. In the financial year 2021, from 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022, there were five. Over the period you’re talking about, that would add up to 33.
Senator ROBERTS: How many drugs have been approved under the normal process during that same period?
Dr Skerritt: During the same period? I will add the three financial years and I’ll check my mental arithmetic. So 36 this current financial year, and 117. These are either new approvals or new indications approved. And 95 the year before. So, it is a significant percentage, but not most of them.
Senator ROBERTS: Is the maximum provisional approval period six years because it can take that long to get drugs approved under the old approval system?
Dr Skerritt: A provisional approval is only valid for two years and then the company either has to come back and show why they cannot obtain all the data within the period and apply for an extension.
Senator ROBERTS: No, the maximum provisional approval?
Dr Skerritt: They can apply for further lots of two years.
Senator ROBERTS: Is the maximum provisional approval—
Dr Skerritt: Overall the maximum period is six years, but it’s not six years off the bat.
Senator ROBERTS: It’s two years with extensions.
Dr Skerritt: They are possible extensions; they’re not guaranteed.
Senator ROBERTS: How much money do you save pharmaceutical companies by switching from full approval to express approval? I understand it’s hundreds of millions per approval?
Dr Skerritt: It actually costs the pharmaceutical companies more in regulatory fees for provisional approval.
Senator ROBERTS: No, I didn’t say regulatory fees. How much are you saving the pharmaceutical companies by giving them express or provisional approval rather than going through the six-year period for getting proper approval?
Dr Skerritt: No, you’ve misinterpreted the system. It’s not a six-year period to get full regulatory approval.
Senator ROBERTS: It varies. I accept that.
Dr Skerritt: Most of our approvals are submitted as a standard approval, especially, for example, if it wasn’t a public health emergency or it’s a drug that already has others in the same category. They’re submitted as a standard approval.
Senator ROBERTS: Dedicated trials for their drugs, I understand, can be hundreds of millions of dollars. How much time and money would they save by going express?
Dr Skerritt: We would not give a provisional approval to a medicine unless there were clinical trials.
Senator ROBERTS: How much money does it save if they do a provisional without doing a formal or normal approval process? How much money does it save the drug company?
Dr Skerritt: I don’t believe there are necessarily savings. The situation would be different for every drug. It’s really important to emphasise there were very extensive clinical trials for the vaccines and treatments that have been through provisional approval.
Senator ROBERTS: My understanding is that it can cost hundreds of millions of dollars to get the full approval process. Without the dedicated trial, they could save hundreds of millions of dollars per drug?
Dr Skerritt: I don’t necessarily agree with you.
Senator ROBERTS: When does the provisional approval for Pfizer expire?
Dr Skerritt: The two-year period will be two years from the anniversary of the first approval. I would emphasise that in certain countries—
Senator ROBERTS: What is that date?
Dr Skerritt: The products are now fully approved.
Senator ROBERTS: What is the date of provisional approval expiry?
Dr Skerritt: For the very first approval, for 16 years and over, the two-year period finishes on 25 January 2023.
Senator ROBERTS: I have in front of me a document called the Australian Public Assessment Report for Tozinameran, from Comirnaty (Pfizer), dated December 2021. Is this the approval application for the paediatric version of the Pfizer vaccine?
Dr Skerritt: No, it is not. An Australian Public Assessment Report is a summary of the assessment that we did of the application. You mentioned Pfizer. The actual application is over 220,000 thousand pages of paper from Pfizer for that particular group of vaccines.
Senator ROBERTS: I reference page 61, which states:
Limitations of the current application data. Safety follow-up is currently limited to median 2.4 months post dose 2 in cohort 1, and 2.4 weeks for the safety expansion cohort.
What is the safety expansion cohort?
Dr Skerritt: Remember, also, this was going back to the time of approval. We now have hundreds of millions, actually more than a billion, people who have been vaccinated with that vaccine and experience going on since December 2020, when the first vaccination was done. The safety expansion cohort is in a clinical trial where individuals are monitored closely and the data reported back to regulators for periods of months, leading to years, after their vaccination.
Senator ROBERTS: Did you recommend this substance based on 2.4 weeks of safety testing or did you get more in? If so, over what period? How many months?
Dr Skerritt: Remember the initial approval from TGA was based on that two months of follow-up, but we also had the experience of other countries that had more than a month before starting mass vaccination campaigns. When we approved Pfizer on 25 January2021, we were in almost daily contact with the British, who by that stage had vaccinated millions of British people by 25 January 2021. Real-world evidence played a very important role in both the approvals and in the ongoing safety monitoring of these vaccines.
Senator ROBERTS: So you relied on data from other countries and you relied for periods of months, merely months. It can’t be more than six months, because there’s a gap between application and approval and to give time for collection of data and analysis. There should be years of data before we start putting this stuff into our children, yet it’s months.
Dr Skerritt: I disagree in the context of a pandemic and a public health crisis. Regulators globally felt that it was appropriate to do initial approvals—
Senator ROBERTS: You’re the Australian regulator.
Dr Skerritt: As the head of the Australian regulator, I would do precisely the same if I had my time again. The alternative would have been to leave Australians unvaccinated through the course of 2020, 2021 and 2022, and there would have been tens of thousands more Australian deaths.
Senator ROBERTS: Can I reference a letter from the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, signed by Radha Khiani, Director, Governance and Coordination section, in which the department makes this claim. The letter from 4 November 2022, just last week, states:
A large team of technical and clinical experts at the TGA carefully evaluated the data submitted by the sponsor. A treatment or vaccine is only provisionally approved if this rigorous process is completed.
This document concerned the use of Pfizer stages 2 to 3 cynical trial data in support of their application for provisional approval. Did the TGA check the stage 2 and stage 3 clinical trial data from Pfizer? Did you check it?
Dr Skerritt: We did check the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data from Pfizer and we also took it to independent external medical experts as well as consumer representatives.
Senator ROBERTS: Referencing Freedom of Information No. 2289, in which the applicant requested a copy of the stage 2 and stage 3 clinical trial data, the TGA responded that the ‘TGA does not hold any relevant documents relating to the request’. That was a request for stages 2 to 3 clinical trial data.
Dr Skerritt: Without seeing what’s in your hand, I believe that you asked for individual patient data rather than the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. I can give you my word that we assessed the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data; otherwise, what else did we do? Look at the colour of the label on the bottle? That is the main thing our team of several thousand clinicians look at in reviewing a new vaccine, the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. It is the centrepiece.
Senator ROBERTS: The freedom-of-information request then asked for ‘any documents confirming the process of analysing this data to a decision, including meetings, notes, dates and times’. Again the TGA replied, ‘We have no relevant documents.’ Did you review the stage 2 and stage 3 data or not, and, if you did, why did you tell this freedom-of-information applicant you did not have these documents? Which document is the lie? One of them is.
Dr Skerritt: I don’t have that document in front of me. We can review it on notice. But we reviewed the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data at length.
CHAIR: This really needs to be the last one so I can share the call.
Senator ROBERTS: I just want you to think about this and confirm it or otherwise: and ‘the trail data contained sufficient proof the vaccines were safe and effective, sufficient to meet the criteria for provisional approval’; is that correct?
Dr Skerritt: Correct. Yes.
Aussie Cossack arrested and thrown in NSW caboose for 6 weeks
by Peter Gargan
Simeon Boikov AKA Aussie Cossack was remanded in custody by a Magistrate at the Burwood Magistrates Court in Sydney on Thursday May 19, 2022.
So far Cairns News has not been able to discover what offence he committed if any and the charges he faces.
It is time we got some lawyers in the Commonwealth who know the law as well as they know the Judges and Magistrates. The Police Prosecutor and the lawyer for Simeon Boikov put the Magistrate and Police in harms way because since 2002 S 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995 (CTH) has been doubtful among the Laws of the Commonwealth and it gives sharks teeth to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights because it makes a breach of Article 9 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights a serious indictable offence carrying seventeen years imprisonment.
Further S 268:20 Criminal Code Act 1995 (CTH) adds another seventeen years to the charge as it is enlivened when S 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995 (CTH) kicks in. S 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995 (CTH) bans imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty and S 268:20 Criminal Code Act 1995 (CTH) bans persecution.
Simeon Boikov is being persecuted as a larrikan.
In 2016 the Federal Court of Australia with 36 Judges sitting together on the 7th November 2016 made the Federal Court (Criminal Proceedings) Rules 2016. Under those Rules are prescribed forms CP14 and CP15 which allow anyone when authorised by the Parliament of the Commonwealth in S 13 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) to allege by ex-officio indictment in the Federal Court of Australia that an offence has been committed against the Laws of the Commonwealth and since the Judges have made those forms, it must be assumed they intended them to be used.
Attempts by various people to use those forms have so far been frustrated by people who call themselves Judicial Registrars and one has yet to be accepted. In point of fact the use of such forms on behalf of Simeon Boikov would mean that a form of Habeas Corpus exercised by the Federal Court of Australia has been created that attracts no filing fee whatsoever as the accused would have to prove to the Federal Court of Australia the detention was not arbitrary.
Further the common law declared in S 4B and S4J Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) provides a formula for converting a Commonwealth term of imprisonment into a pecuniary penalty. The pecuniary penalty for the State of New South Wales for having its agent the Magistrate and its Police Service for seventeen years imprisonment for the Body Corporate that is the State of New South Wales is $1,070,000 for each offence. The Magistrate personally could be liable for $214,000 for each offence. So too the Police Prosecutor. As the aggrieved person Simeon Boikov would be entitled to those sums for every day he is confined by reference to S 4K Crimes Act 1914 (Cth).
So where do we get a lawyer to check this out and trot down to the Federal Court of Australia and get Simeon Boikov out of jail and handsomely compensated for his inconvenience? Where are the Bar Association and Law Society when you really need them?
Hitler’s view on the media
from Kev Moore
Our Daily Bread the Media – From ‘Mein Kampf’ by Adolph Hitler
“……….If we consider the attitude of various Governments towards a whole series of really pernicious phenomena in public life, we shall at once recognise the fearful significance of this policy of half-measures and the lack of courage to take responsibilities. I shall single out only a few from the large numbers of instances known to me.
In journalistic circles it is a pleasing custom to speak of the Press as a ‘Great Power’ within the State. As a matter of fact its importance is immense. One cannot easily overestimate it, for the Press continues the work of education even in adult life. Generally, readers of the press can be classified into three groups:
First, those who believe everything they read;
Second, those who no longer believe anything;
Third, those who critically examine what they read and form from their judgements accordingly.
Numerically, the first group is by far the strongest, being composed of the broad masses of the people………………….
………………………………………………The third group is easily the smallest, being composed of real intellectuals whom natural aptitude and education have taught to think for themselves and who in all things try to form their own judgements, while at the same time carefully sifting what they read. They will not read any newspaper without using their own intelligence to collaborate with that of the writer and naturally this does not set the writer an easy task. journalists appreciate this type of reader only with a certain amount of reservation.
Hence the trash that newspapers are capable of serving up is of little danger —— much less of importance——-to the third group of readers. In the majority of cases these readers have learnt to regard every journalist as fundamentally a rogue who sometimes speaks the truth. Most unfortunately the value of these readers lies in their intelligence and not in their numerical strength, an unhappy state of affairs in a period where wisdom counts for nothing and majorities for everything. Nowadays when the voting papers of the masses are the deciding factor; the decision lies in the hands of the numerically strongest group; that is to say the first group, the crowd of simpletons and the credulous…………………………
………………………………Particular attention should be paid to the Press; for its influence on these people is by far the strongest and most penetrating of all; since its affect is not transitory but continual. Its immense significance lies in the uniform and persistent repetition of its teaching. Here if anywhere, the State should never forget that all means should converge to the same end. It must not be led astray by the will-o’-the-wisp of so called ‘freedom of the Press’, or is talked into neglecting its duty, and withholding from the nation that which is good and does good. With ruthless determination the State must keep control of this instrument of popular education and place it at the service of the State and the nation………………………….
………………………..Was it not the German Press that understood how to make all the nonsensical talk about ‘Western democracy’ palatable to our people, until an exuberant public was eventually prepared to entrust its future to the League of Nations? Was not this Press instrumental in bringing a state of moral degredation among our people? Were not morals and public decency made to look ridiculous and classed out of date and banal,until finally our people also became modernised?……………………………..
…………………………………The function of the so called liberal Press was to dig the grave for the German people and Reich. No mention need be made of the lying Marxist Press. To them the spreading of falsehood is as much a vital necessity as the mouse is to a cat. Their task is to break the national backbone of the people, thus preparing the nation to become the slaves of international finance and its masters, the Jews……………………
…………………………………….And what measures did the State take to counteract this wholesale poisoning of the public mind? None, absolutely nothing at all. By this policy it was hoped to win the favour of this pest—–by means of flattery, by a recognition of the ‘value’ of the Press, its importance, its ‘educative mission’ and similar nonsense. The Jews acknowledged all this with a knowing smile and returned thanks.”
From page 132, “……….Of course it would be out of the question to enter into an argument with these liars who deny at one moment what they said the moment before. I should waste no further words on them were it not for the fact that there are many thoughtless people who repeat all this in parrot fashion, without necessarily being inspired by any evil motives. But the observations I am making here are also meant for our fighting followers, seeing that nowadays ones spoken words are often forgotten and twisted in their meaning..”
Vaccination and the Media – conflicts of interest in Australia
by Diane Drayton Buckland
Former Australian Politician Peter Costello is now Chairman of the Australian Government Investment Fund which includes over a billion dollars’ worth of vaccine company shares, while he also chairs a media company which publishes articles demeaning and marginalising people who question the ever-increasing number of lucrative vaccine products being added to the vaccination schedule.
There’s a murky story to uncover about relationships between the media and vaccine industry…and connections with government.
We the people have to work on exposing this scandal ourselves…
Elizabeth Hart – Australia
Independent citizen investigating conflicts of interest in vaccination policy and the over-use of vaccine products >
News Corp Australia
Murdoch media as unbelievable as can be found in the world, except perhaps for the ABC
Note that mainstream media in Australia has massive conflicts of interest
The entire Australian Government Vaccination Policy is totally corrupted with systemic and widespread conflicts of interest (and there has never been any Independent Regulator to oversee or put a stop to these shocking situations which is and has always put entire populations in harm’s way.)
This Investigative Research is as per the work of Independent Investigators/Researchers Dr. Judy Wilyman and Elizabeth Hart and others and what they have discovered is absolutely disgusting and dangerous.
The article hereunder is another example of the crimes against the people of Australia by Government, with mainstream medicine, mainstream media and the Pharmaceutical Industry and their superglued ties/partnerships/members/revolving doors to State and Federal Governments in Australia.
See example of these Australian Tyrants >
Aussie Health Chief Says People Who Don’t Get Vaccinated Will be “Miserable” and “Lonely” for Life
And people like him are elevated to high places. The world has learned nothing from the acts of history’s most unhinged.
Global Research, November 15, 2021
See related articles also.
James Murdoch Son of Rupert Murdoch gave $20 million to Biden, progressive groups in 2020:
June, 13, 2021 James Murdoch funneled $100 million into his Quadrivium Foundation, which gives to many progressive causes, and donated another $20 million to Democratic groups, CNBC reported.
Crisis actors in make up facilities fake casualties across the world
When advertisements appear for crisis actors we know there is another false flag about to occur. The makeup artists do Hollywood proud. MSM is either too dumb to discover they have been conned or are complicit.
Assange says we are better off without ‘rotten and corrupt media’
Julian Paul Assange ; born 3 July 1971) is an Australian editor, publisher and activist who founded WikiLeaks in 2006. WikiLeaks came to international attention in 2010 when it published a series of leaks provided by U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning. These leaks included the Baghdad airstrike Collateral Murder video (April 2010), the Afghanistan war logs (July 2010), the Iraq war logs (October 2010), and Cablegate (November 2010). After the 2010 leaks, the United States government launched a criminal investigation into WikiLeaks. He is being held in the UK’s Belmarsh Prison awaiting an appeal against his extradition to America.
MSM will not report truthfully on Ukraine
by Kev Moore
Reuters and Associated Press 100% Owned By Zionist Rothschild: History Of The House Of The Rothschild
The House of Zionist Rothschild bought Reuters news service in the 1800’s. Within the last 20 years, Reuters bought the Associated Press. Now the Elite own the two largest wire services in the world, where most newspapers get their news. The Rothschilds have control of all three U.S. Networks, plus other aspects of the recording and mass media industry according to research by Eustice Mullins in his book ‘Who Owns the TV Networks’.
“Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.” – Protocol 12:4 The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
“In 1913 Jacob Schiff sets up the Anti Defamation League (ADL) in the United States. This organisation is FORMED TO SLANDER ANYONE WHO QUESTIONS OR CHALLENGES THE ZIONIST ROTHSCHILD GLOBAL CONSPIRACY AS BEING ANTI-SEMITIC.”
Who to believe with Ukraine? MSM gets the thumbs down
Letter to the Editor
It’s harder and harder to discern the truth these days. All we can really do is arrive at truth through a process of elimination of the lies (and the sources of lies) one by one. We certainly cannot trust the mainstream media which has proven itself a cheer squad for the Globalists. If the media wants us to hate Putin, then I will by default give Putin the benefit of the doubt, especially given his patience during 5 years of 24/7 false allegations of Trump Russia Collusion.
Given the media covered up the corruption in Ukraine and the funneling of dirty money to the US Congress through Hunter Biden’s Burisma board membership, I will not trust them when they claim that Russia is being aggressive towards Ukraine. I will assume the military strikes were targeted and measured, unlike the US’s war in Iraq and in fact most Allied wars.
The Holocausts in Dresden and Nagasaki and Hiroshima come to mind. Let’s not forget that the changes that Obama made to the Smith Mundt Act, which made it legal for the US media to lie, are still in place. And the fact that Trump didn’t bother to rescind those changes, makes him suspect as well. The world’s a stage as Bill Spearchucker once said.
from David Esplin
World Doctor’s Alliance says the Covid scam is well and truly finished – take off your masks
Brilliant Professor of Immunology Dr Dolores Cahill President of the World Doctors Alliance is a world leader in her field. There are few if any government medical advisers in Australia who could hold a candle to her. She has said continually do not vaxx the children (or adults). She has been Deputy Chairman of the European Innovative Medicines Initiative Committee since 2018.
The primary element of social control is the strategy of distraction by MSM
Noam Chomsky, one of the most important intellectuals alive today, has elaborated the list of the 10 strategies of manipulation through mass media.
Take 5 minutes and you won’t regret it.
If only to expand your knowledge.
1- The strategy of distraction
The primary element of social control is the strategy of distraction that consists in diverting the public’s attention from important problems and changes decided by political and economic elites, through the flood technique or floods of constant distractions and meaningless information.
The distraction strategy is also indispensable to prevent the public from interest in essential knowledge, in the areas of science, economics, psychology, neurobiology and cybernetics. Keeping the public’s attention deviated from the real social problems, imprisoned by topics of no real importance.
Keeping the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think, back to the farm like the other animals (quoted in “Silent weapons for peaceful wars”).
2- Create problems and then offer solutions.
This method is also called “problem- reaction- solution”. A problem is created, a “situation” intended to cause a certain reaction from the public, with the aim that this is the mandate of the measures they want to be accepted. For example: letting urban violence be rampant or intensified, or staging bloody attacks, in order that the public is the one demanding security laws and policies at the expense of liberty. Or also: create an economic crisis to make the regression of social rights and the dismantling of public services accepted as a necessary evil.
3- The strategy of graduality.
To get an unacceptable measure accepted, you just need to apply it step by step, with droplets, for consecutive years. This is how radically new socio-economic conditions (neoliberalism) were imposed during the decades of the ’80s and ’90s: Minimum state, privatization, precariousness, flexibility, mass unemployment, wages that no longer guarantee decent salaries, many changes that would have caused a revolution if they were applied at once.
4- The strategy of deferring.
Another way to get an unpopular decision accepted is to present it as “painful and necessary”, gaining public acceptance, for the time being, for a future application. It is easier to accept a future sacrifice than an immediate sacrifice. First, because the effort isn’t what’s put in immediately. Second, because the audience, the masses, always tend to naively hope that “everything will be better tomorrow” and that the required sacrifice could be avoided. This gives the audience more time to get used to the idea of change and accept it resigned when the time comes.
5- Addressing the audience like children.
Most advertising directed at the general public uses speeches, topics, characters and a particularly childish intonation, often close to weakness, as if the viewer were a creature of few years or a moron men such. The more you try to deceive the viewer, the more you tend to use a childish tone. Why? “If someone refers to a person as if they were 12 years old or younger, then, based on suggestability, they will tend, with some probability, to a response or reaction that is also of a person 12 years old or less o” (see “Silent weapons for peaceful wars”).
6- Use the emotional aspect much more than reflection.
Take advantage of emotion is a classic technique to provoke a short circuit on rational analysis and, finally, the individual’s critical sense. In addition, using the emotional register allows you to open the door to the unconscious to implant or inject ideas, desires, fears and fears, compulsions, or induce behaviors.
7- Keeping the audience in ignorance and mediocrity.
Making the public unable to understand the technologies and methods used for their control and slavery.
“The quality of education given to the lower social classes must be the poorest and mediocre possible, so that the distance of ignorance that they plan between the lower and the upper classes will remain impossible to fill the lower classes”.
8- Encourage the audience to be complacent with mediocrity.
Pushing the audience into believing it’s trendy to be stupid, vulgar and ignorant…
9- Strengthening self-guilt.
Making the individual believe that he is the only one to blame for his misfortune, because of his insufficient intelligence, ability or effort. Thus, instead of rebelling against the economic system, the individual self devalues and blames himself, which in turn creates a depressive state, one of which effects is the inhibition of his action. And without action there is no revolution!
10- Knowing individuals better than they know themselves.
Over the past 50 years, science’s rapid advances have caused a growing gap between the public’s knowledge and those owned and used by the dominant elites. Thanks to biology, neurobiology, and applied psychology, the “system” has enjoyed an advanced knowledge of the human being, both in its physical and psychological form. The system has managed to know the common individual better than he knows himself. This means that, in most cases, the system exercises greater control and power over individuals, greater than that individual exercises over himself.