Category Archives: Election

Pat O’Shane calls for lifting of JobSeeker and pension payments

Cairns Anti Poverty Network members gathered this morning outside the Cairns DFO pre-polling centre to send a final message before election day. They called for the next government to slash poverty with a single stroke by lifting the rate of JobSeeker and pensions.

Former Magistrate Pat O’Shane stands up for relieving poverty

“Poverty is a policy choice. And it is the choice that successive governments have chosen for many of us in Far North Queensland”, declared Pat O’Shane, Kuku Yalanji trailblazer, former magistrate, and candidate for Leichhardt.

“I grew up dirt poor in a shack shared with my parents and younger siblings. Today Australia is a rich and modern country, yet poverty is rising again.

“For a short window in the early days of the pandemic this Government significantly lifted the incomes of many people on income support through the Coronavirus Supplement introduced on April 27, 2020.

“That was the day when Australian poverty was slashed in half through a single initiative. Lives drastically improved in Far North Queensland”, she said.

Community housing providers, Access Housing and SHAC (Shelter Housing Action Cairns) reported that their tenants were able to clear rent arrears – in many cases for the first time. St Vincent De Paul saw a 78% decline in requests for assistance in Far North Queensland (April 2020 compared with April 2019).

“But it was short-lived. As the supplement was wound back in early 2021, St Vincent De Paul and other welfare agencies saw requests for emergency relief rise sharply.

“We used to talk about people falling through the cracks. Now increasingly there is no floor.” said Renee Lees, rally organiser, spokeswoman for Cairns Anti-Poverty Network and Senate Candidate.

“This election has heard talk of the housing crisis, cost of living and stagnating wages. But the incomes of Australia’s poorest have largely been overlooked, with neither major party prepared to commit to lifting payments above the poverty line. 

“The Cairns Anti Poverty Network asks voters to assess parties by their commitment to a future where no one is left behind. We ask our next government to choose dignity over poverty and raise the rate of JobSeeker and other income support to at least $70 a day. The Greens and Socialist Alliance have committed to that.” explained Lees.

AEC not yet proven where election writs have been advertised as required by Electoral Act

It seems the Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers has been unable to provide proof of where the election writ has been published as required under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.

Dale Holmes writes that the AEC has been unable to state which newspapers have published the writs, therefore a huge question mark hangs over the legitimacy of the federal election on Saturday.

https://t.me/DaleHolmes1985/1084

154  Writs for election of members of House of Representatives

             (1)  A writ for the election of a Member of the House of Representatives or for a general election for the House of Representatives shall be addressed to the Electoral Commissioner.

             (2)  Only 8 writs shall be issued for each general election, namely:

                     (a)  a writ that relates to the members to be elected from New South Wales;

                     (b)  a writ that relates to the members to be elected from Victoria;

                     (c)  a writ that relates to the members to be elected from Queensland;

                     (d)  a writ that relates to the members to be elected from South Australia;

                     (e)  a writ that relates to the members to be elected from Western Australia;

                      (f)  a writ that relates to the members to be elected from Tasmania;

                     (g)  a writ that relates to the members to be elected from the Australian Capital Territory; and

                     (h)  a writ that relates to the members to be elected from the Northern Territory.

             (3)  The 8 writs issued for a general election shall be issued on the same day.

             (4)  Where a writ for an election to be held in a Division, or each Division, in a State or Territory is received by the Electoral Commissioner under subsection (1), the Commissioner shall:

                     (a)  endorse on the writ the date of its receipt;

                     (b)  advertise receipt of, and particulars of, the writ:

                              (i)  in not less than 2 newspapers circulating generally in the State or Territory; or

                             (ii)  if there is only one newspaper circulating generally in the State or Territory—in that newspaper;

                     (c)  take such steps as the Commissioner considers appropriate to advise the Divisional Returning Officer or each Divisional Returning Officer, as the case requires, of the particulars of the writ, including the dates fixed by the writ; and

                     (d)  give such directions as the Commissioner considers appropriate to the Divisional Returning Officer or each Divisional Returning Officer, as the case requires, in relation to the holding of the election.

    (5)  Where a writ for an election to be held in a Division or Divisions is received by the Electoral Commissioner under subsection (1), the Commissioner may, where he or she considers it appropriate, advertise receipt of, and particulars of, the writ, in a newspaper or newspapers circulating in the Division or in some or all of the Divisions, as the case requires.

153  Writs for election of Senators

             (1)  A writ for the election of Senators shall be addressed to the Australian Electoral Officer for the State or Territory for which the election is to be held.

             (2)  Where a writ for an election of Senators is received by the Australian Electoral Officer for a State or Territory under subsection (1), the officer shall:

                     (a)  endorse on the writ the date of its receipt;

                     (b)  advertise receipt of, and particulars of, the writ:

                              (i)  in not less than 2 newspapers circulating generally in the State or Territory; or

                             (ii)  if there is only one newspaper circulating generally in the State or Territory—in that newspaper;

                     (c)  take such steps as the officer considers appropriate to advise each Divisional Returning Officer in the State or Territory of the dates fixed by the writ; and

                     (d)  give such directions as the officer considers appropriate to each Divisional Returning Officer in relation to the holding of the election.

The AEC has been contacted for comment with this request:

‘To Tom Rogers
Australian Electoral Commissioner
Dear Sir,
Could you please provide information relating to the publication of the writs for a general election as required under section 153 and 154 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.

  • eight writs have to be published, could you please advise in what newspapers, location and date of publication.
    Thank you
    J O’Toole
    Editor
    Cairns News
    May 18, 2022′

Honest government election 2022

The Australian Government has made a final ad before the 2022 federal election and it’s surprisingly honest and informative. Occasional explicit language

Labor will hijack councils to wipe ratepayers out with climate change emergency

Update to 2019 NLGA conference

by Alison Ryan

The Resolution 29: That the NGA call on the Australian Government to:
Declare a climate Emergency
Establish a $10 billion national fund for councils to build the resilience of climate change vulnerable communities
Commit to providing maximum protection for all people, economies, species, ecosystems and civilisations, and to fully restoring a safe climate
Mobile the required resources and take effective action at the necessary scale and speed across Australia
Transport the economy to zero emissions and make a fair contribution to drawing down the excess carbon dioxide in the air
Encourage all other governments around the world to take these same actions

The Response, 24 Oct 2019, from Sussan Ley MP Minister for the Environment, read as follows:
The Australian Government takes the issue of climate change seriously. The Government is taking the action that is needed to address climate change. As a result of the policies that the Government has put in place over the last six years, Australia will exceed its Kyoto 2020 targets by 367 million tonnes. The Government has set out, to the last tonne, responsible targets to ensure that Australia meets its Paris 2030 commitments. Emissions per capita are now at the lowest level in 29 years and by 2050, emissions per capita will fall by 50 percent. Due to the Government’s commitment to meeting its Renewable energy Target, Australia’s investment per capita in renewable energy is currently the highest in the world. The Government will continue to take responsible action on climate change in a way which ensures both jobs for the future, and a clean and green environment.

A much clearer news report from The West Australian says, “Environment Minister Sussan Ley tells mayors to stay out of climate change”, dated 18 July 2019.
“Ms Ley did not say if she would declare such an emergency, but believes councils should focus on dealing with local environmental issues, such as household rubbish.”
“The Australian councils are part of 800 across the globe to have declared climate emergencies, encompassing more than 140 million people. Victoria’s Darebin City Council was the first to take the leap in 2016. Darebin has taken a steering role among other local administrations, leading a national climate emergency conference last year.”
Link: Environment Minister Sussan Ley tells mayors to stay out of climate change | The West Australian

I think these Councils are a not fit to do other than services. Through ICLEI they are globalists. eg: Think local – act global.

ICLEI news reports “Labor commits to working with local government on climate action”.
“Friday 8 April – Shadow Minister for Climate Change and Energy, The Hon. Chris Bowen MP committed to collaborating with local governments on climate action if elected to the Federal Government. The Hon. Chris Bowen joined over 200 Mayors and elected members representing over 108 local governments from across Australia to discuss Labor’s priorities to adapt, mitigate and build resilience.”

“As one of the small handful of former Mayors in the House of Representatives, I embrace partnership between the Commonwealth and local government, particularly in climate change,” stated Mr. Bowen. “States, territories and local governments are getting on with doing the job and I want to provide a better framework for that to occur as part of a more consistent national approach.”

“During the Roundtable, if elected, the Shadow Minister Chris Bowen committed to:
A roundtable with the Mayors in June to discuss how to accelerate climate action with local governments.

Invite a representative of the Australian Local Government Association to a meeting of all jurisdiction climate change and energy ministers to develop a national framework for climate change and energy policy.”
Link: Labor commits to working with local government on climate action — ICLEI Oceania

So there we have it – Local Government sneaking into the National Cabinet = 3 tiers of government.

SACK THEM ALL is the Rally cry for Melbourne’s next Freedom March on 14 May.
Telegram: Contact @melbournefreedomrallyupdates

Confirmation of electoral fraud in France cost Le Pen the presidency

by Han Barkmeyer

According to Le Monde, one of the “most important and widely respected” newspapers in the world, all the talk about “Voter Fraud” and a “Stolen Election” was caused by “a technical bug” on France 2 TV: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2022/04/27/presidential-election-2022-the-ongoing-fantasy-of-electoral-fraud_5981737_7.html

On Monday, the video of a technical bug on France 2 during the election night spread like wildfire. Contrary to the results announced since 20 p.m., and in contradiction with the score of 58.5% for Mr. Macron displayed at the same time by the network, the far-right candidate appeared fleetingly in the lead in total votes cast. This technical error, acknowledged by the network to Le Monde, was then quickly rectified, but the damage was done.

At 21.10 p.m. Le Pen had 13,899,494 votes.
At 22:45 p.m. Le Pen had 11,558,051 votes.
Where did the 2,341,443 votes go? asked the user “Patriote Info,” one of many suspicious posts.

This was the “proof” that so many activists had been waiting for to accuse the Macron camp of fraud. Already in mid-afternoon, a poll in the conspiratorial Telegram channel “Stay Free!” (11,000 subscribers) indicated that 81% of the 2,500 participants predicted that “the power will cheat to force a Macron victory.” Between sarcasm and triumphalism, many have since convinced themselves that they were right.

This link shows the actual footage of France 2 TV at 9.15 PM Le Pen with 14,432,396 votes ahead of Macron with 14,214,825 votes.
https://twitter.com/lequestionniste/status/1518362504497356801

From Bloomberg:
French Presidential Election Second Round Results
Figures in this chart are based on official results

Emmanuel Macron Republic on the Move
Count 18,779,811
Pct.58.5

Marine Le Pen National Rally
Count 13,297,728
Pct. 41.5

Abstentions 13,655,962
Blank + invalid votes 3,018,999

These results are based on a total of 32,077,539 valid votes. All expected votes have been reported.
Data as of: April 25, 2022, 6:48 AM GMT+7

Yes, what happened to the 1,134,668 votes for Le Pen? “A technical bug”? Yeah, sure.
Of course, Klaus Schwab and his Tribe had to keep the World Economic Forum Young Global Leader, former Rothschild Banker and pro-EU President Macron in power.

“Those who vote decide nothing, those who count the vote decide everything.” – Comrade Joseph Stalin

Voter fraud took out Le Pen in French election

by Kev Moore

Marine Le Pen

2017 – Marine Le Pen: The French Election Was Rigged

It’s not some grand conspiracy, but it’s grand theft all the same. Le Pen voters lost their ballots, their rights, by the millions on Sunday.
In France, if a ballot is damaged, it cannot be cast. So the political establishment, who are desperate to prevent Le Pen from taking office, arranged for the destruction of millions of Le Pen ballots.

Up to one third of all ballots sent out to voters, an estimated 60% of Le Pen ballots, were destroyed at the time of mailing. Only Le Pen ballots arrived destroyed, there is not one report of a single ballot for Macron arriving destroyed.
In the week leading up to the election reports began pouring in that an enormous number of ballots for Le Pen were destroyed at the time of mailing. They were torn badly, rendering them void, before they were mailed out.

The randomness of the tears proves they were torn by hand – with intent. This was a major, co-ordinated effort, orchestrated by the establishment.
The Le Pen campaign complained to the election watchdog, claiming ballots had been “systematically torn up” – but the watchdog merely gave a Gallic shrug, and banned the media from reporting on it.

But it gets even worse.

Voters in districts which heavily favored Macon also received multiple ballots, enabling them to vote twice. The French election commission even confirmed that multiple votes would count, and wouldn’t be investigated until after the election.
The French election was, in this method, stolen. Macron is not the legitimate president of France.

How did this happen?

The French media, forever in the pocket of the elite, refused to report on the issue, allowing the establishment to stifle the will of the people.
However, after the election, mainstream outlets did publish some interesting data. Agence France Press, for instance, admitted that a staggering number of French voters cast ballots which didn’t count.

Nearly one in three French citizens who voted on Sunday did not cast a valid ballot for Macron or Le Pen.
There is always a number of blank or spoiled protest votes in any election. But the number of spoiled ballots in this election was quadruple the usual number in France.

Suspicious much?

Agence France Press tried to cover up the fact that many people had their votes destroyed by claiming that these people “declined to choose” between Macron and Le Pen, and reported that many of them had spoiled their ballots.
Spoiled how? Rips and tears? How convenient.

According to Agence France Press:

A third of French voters declined to choose between centrist Emmanuel Macron and far-right leader Marine Le Pen in Sunday’s presidential election, either abstaining or spoiling their ballots — a record rate in nearly half a century.
According to official results with more than 80 percent of votes counted, the abstention rate stood at 24.52 percent — the highest since the presidential election in 1969.

“That would make a total of one French person out of three who decided not to choose between the two candidates. It’s really a lot for a presidential election,” Anne Jadot, political science professor at the University of Lorraine, told AFP.

The steal is in. The French establishment successfully silenced the voice of the people. Now the media is attempting to cover it up.

Macron is a usurper and not a legitimate president. He was selected by the elite, and placed into power via a rigged election that silenced millions of French patriots. What millions of French people suspected has now been visibly and obviously proven to them – will they now join Le Pen’s call for revolution against the establishment?

http://yournewswire.com/marine-le-pen-election-rigged/

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-25/meet-real-emmanuel-macron-consummate-banker-puppet-bizarre-elitist-creation

http://forward.com/opinion/340090/meet-the-french-jews-who-love-marine-le-pen-and-her-far-right-party/

2022
Clear evidence of election fraud in French presidential elections. In this first video mainstream news reporter Jean Baptist announces that data received directly from the government showed Marine Le Pen was slightly ahead of Macron with exactly 13,899,494 votes. Yet somehow by the time the night was over her vote count had DECREASED by over 1.13 million votes. This by itself is going to create serious legitimacy issues for Macron, but a second video which has also gone viral makes shows precisely how this was accomplished. As you can see the ballots for Le Pen were intentionally defaced in order to rule them invalid. The fact that all of the tears were in exactly the same place means that someone was doing this on a massive scale and quickly.

https://t.me/StormCloudsGathering/736

After signage loss, it’s time for majors parties to put up a noble fight in war of independents

Zoe Daniel

James Robertson Political Editor – The NEWDAILY

After a court victory ensured supporters can proudly hoist her campaign flag, independent challenger for Goldstein, Zoe Daniel, says major parties must now stop vilifying hundreds of thousands of voters in Australia.

Bayside City Council, which regulates political advertising locally, mounted an extraordinary attempt to ban the display of Ms Daniel’s campaign material.

Her Goldstein opponent, Liberal MP Tim Wilson, used his parliamentary correspondence to argue the signs were illegal,  and encouraged neighbours to dob in those guilty of violations to cop a $1000 fine.

The court’s overrule had been widely expected by experts, who had argued it had adopted a “strange” interpretation of state-based planning bylaws.

“Our supporters can now feel free: who could ever have predicted this to be an issue in our campaign for federal parliament?” Ms Daniel told The New Daily.

Mr Wilson even insinuated some of his electors were “lawbreakers”, and encouraged other residents to dob them in to him personally.

Goldstein has been in Liberal hands since its inception – despite a major swing at the last election the party sits on a two-party-preferred margin of nearly 58 per cent.

But senior Liberals are now tipping the seat to fall, not even mostly because of the sitting member’s “mystifying” support for a move to impose criminal sanctions on electors in the affluent areas but also under the strength of the campaign run by Ms Daniel, who is on the vanguard of a new electoral politics.

That Mr Wilson ever took such an unlikely yet provocative tack has become a widely used example of the depth of the party’s fears.

And he is joined around the country.

Prominent examples of seats facing independent challenge have recently focused on Bronwyn Bishop’s old seat of Mackellar in North Sydney and Josh Frydenberg’s seat of Kooyong. Colleagues say that increasing and irregular outbursts from Dave Sharma show how tenuous his hold on Wentworth is.

Treasurer Josh Frydenberg is facing a challenge from independent Monique Ryan in Kooyong.

But the weekend’s state election in South Australia was yet another reminder, if it were needed, that the groundswell is growing nationally.

Independents had an unusually prominent role in last weekend’s election due to a number of government MPs moving to parliament’s cross-bench at the beginning of the most recent term.

But as counting continues in seats such as Finniss, where Lou Nicholson continues to hold on to a win-making swing of 17.5 per cent, experts say a greater threat to Liberals from independents is now all but assured.

That has particular implications for several seats but particularly Boothby, the federal marginal Liberal seat which will face a spirited challenge from Jo Dyer. Rebekha Sharkie, the crossbench MP currently representing the blue-blood seat of Mayo, is proof such shifts can happen and that the ingredients for their rise have long been observable.

Political scientists say the growing share of the independent vote in recent decades can be explained by a range of factors, including disengagement from political parties, a growing proportion of the electorate deciding who to vote for as they drive to the polling booth, and also the end of a compelling reformist era in national politics.

The successful showing of the independent challengers so far has inspired criticism, particularly from outlets linked to News Corporation.

Some such stories have gone close to alleging that the independents are a convenient decentralised cover for a grouping of Labor-aligned independents seeking to sneak into parliament under false pretences.

The presence of former staffers from Labor and the activist group GetUp in a company used by some for campaign services has been cited as further evidence that the independents are in fact aligned.

But University of South Australia Professor Rob Manwaring takes precisely the opposite view. He argues that fissures between moderate and right-wing factions within South Australian Liberals also present federally have weakened the party, but also created openings on policy  that are especially apt to be exploited by independent moderates.

“This is not about politics as we know it,” says Zoe Daniel, who is contesting the seat of Goldstein, held by Tim Wilson. Photo: TND

For her part, Ms Daniel, a former ABC journalist who says she voted for Liberal Malcolm Turnbull in 2016 before dropping her support for him over his failure to progress economic and environmental reform, says the movement owes nothing to any party.

“This is not about politics as we know it,” she said.

She also notes that because independents have no organisational or financial support around them, they begin at a massive electoral disadvantage.

Sharing ideas and broader fundraising structures makes sense, she said.

But she stressed that the overwhelming majority of contributions to her campaign come from local individuals, and her policy platform reflects issues that have been of pressing concern to local people.

While Ms Daniel agrees that some former Liberals are disillusioned by the failure to combat climate change and install a federal anti-corruption watchdog, she believes her platform follows no party line.

“I have absolutely no tilt toward either party whatsoever,” she said.

“People are not looking for me to be a political representative, it’s about having someone who listens and who advocates for them.”

No point in voting

Letter to the Editor

What’s the point in VOTING, or even HAVING a Federal Government, if corrupt left-wing extremist activist journalists, lawyers, judges, and Labor/Greens federal and state politicians are the ones running and controlling our Country, and making all the decisions?Djokovic, and his fellow Serbians, should all be kicked out of OUR Country if they refuse to follow OUR rules!We are now living in an evil left-wing extremist (Communist, Nazi, Marxist) Dictatorship,….just look at some of the NAMES of the people who are running OUR country and dictating to us, and the names of some of the journalists reporting on it.

Example, Politicians:-Palaszczuk, Berejiklian, Frydenberg, Barilaro, Falinski, Hazzard, Albaneze, Wong, Plibersek, Keneally, Aly, Georganas, Khalil, Vamvakinou, Crakanthorp, Houssos, Mihailuk, Zangari, Zppia, Sharma, Buchholz, Liu, Sukkar, Singh, Fang, Gulaptis, Perrottet, Petinos, Zimmerman, Fierravanti,….and the list goes on!

Example, Reporters/Journalists:-Stefanovic, Koch, Albrechtsen, Kostakidis, Alberici, Waleed Aly, Zoe Zaczek, Bryant Hevesi, Youssef, Gottliebsen, Zempilas, Viswalingam, Loewenstein, Kalimniou, Tso, Trioli, Van Onselen, Azzopardi, Fernandez, Ghidella, Ibrahim, Shepher, Visontay,….and the list goes on!No wonder Australia is INTERCOURSED!I believe that a person should have to be a ‘second-generation’ Australian before they are allowed to VOTE, and a ‘third-generation’ Australian before they are allowed to enter politics at ANY level, local, state, or federal! (And no lawyers)

Rusty Marsh,

Bathurst NSW 2795.

Don’t forget the MSM. Ed

Exposing Rudds are Duds – This Time Property Scams

First published on CairnsNews September 2013, today “Kevin07 never for heaven” 

Kevin Rudd is a real sleazbag. Just ask any Qld. public servant from the 1990’s. He earned the name Dr Death. Then he had the gall to use his position, as Wayne Goss’s chief of staff, to push his wife’s then small business, Work Directions. No wonder it has grown into such a mega business. It was no accident – it received some almighty help. The career, of one very decent and honest public servant, was flushed down the toilet, so uncle Kev could promote the business. He was not the only one, many others suffered the same fate.

rudd-house2 62 Philip Street, Hawthorne

The next issue, which has not been covered by the media, are his house deals, which are just as sleazy. There are three properties involved.

You see Kev and his wife sold his house at Philip St., Hawthorne, in April, 1994 and immediately signed a lease to lease back the property. They then went out and purchased another property at Dilkera St. Balmoral. This property was purchased in May, 1994 but was not settled until the end of June, 1994. The purchase price of the property was $240,000. Uncle Kev and his missus put the Dilkera St. property back on the market, after only a very short period. A young lady was interested in the property.

It so happened, that she had a boyfriend, who worked for a major firm of solicitors. From the stamped document, the amount of stamp duty paid, when Kev and the missus purchased the property ($2,400), it was obvious, that they had declared to the Qld. Office of State Revenue, that they had intended to live in the property, for the required period (6 months within 12 months of purchase). A partner in the firm of solicitors, where the boyfriend of the young lady, who was interested in purchasing the property, worked, actually contacted Kev and pointed out to him that he did not qualify for the stamp duty exemption (PPR rate). Kev told the solicitor that he had fixed it up, but the solicitor knew he hadn’t and passed the information on (first lie Kev!). Then uncle Kev did something very strange or was it?. The house had a room air conditioner and uncle Kev left it running for 24 hours a day, in a vacant house

The next door neighbours complained about the noise and contacted uncle Kev. Kev went and contacted the original owner, a Mr Allen, who gave Kev instructions on how to work the air conditioner time clock…. INTERESTED?  click below to READ MORE !!

Read the rest of this entry

China has been given access to the entire Queensland electoral roll by Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk

The Queensland Government has been accused of exposing voters to a massive security breach by allowing Chinese-based coders to write critical software for the Queensland Electoral Commission.

While Australia and the United States kicked out the Chinese Huawei IT company, brainless state Labor Party politicians expose the entire voting population to identity theft, bank fraud, and every other aspect of corruption the communists can dream up by allowing China in.

Sky News presenter Peta Credlin dropped the IT bomb on Friday claiming the outsourcing of coding gives China access to the electoral roll and 2,826,613 names, addresses and dates of birth of Queensland residents.

It could make accusations of Russian meddling in the 2016 United States election look like a Facebook discussion.

China effectively could manipulate the result of the upcoming state election, which should raise the hackles of the unions and Deep State operatives within the QEC.

Pauline Hanson lost the state seat of Lockyer at the 2015 state election due to fraudulent postal votes.

For decades the unions have been instrumental in large scale voting manipulation, aided and abetted by QEC sleepers, which has changed the result in marginal seats.

Postal voting is the latest method of voting fraud as Pauline Hanson could attest when she narrowly lost the seat of Lockyer in 2015 by a handful of suspected fraudulent postal votes.

Channel 9 reported on the election:

“One Nation’s Pauline Hanson is having a bigger than expected impact in the seat of Lockyer.

With 77 per cent of the votes from Saturday’s state election counted, Ms Hanson had 6974 primary votes (27.3 percent), ahead of Labor’s Steve Leese (6366 or 24.93 per cent).

Sitting LNP Ian Rickuss was ahead with 8596 (33.65 percent), but had suffered a significant swing against him.

The two-candidate preferred breakdown on the Queensland Electoral Commission website has Ms Hanson ahead with 54.6 per cent compared to Mr Rikuss’ 45.3, but that figure is based on only five of the 61 booths.

ABC’s election analyst said Ms Hanson is leading on a swing of 18 per cent in those five booths.”

The counting stretched out for nearly two weeks as postal votes dribbled in. During the counting, for example,  Ms Hanson was ahead with 100 votes then the next day150 postal votes would arrive. Conversely the next day she would again be ahead by 75 votes then the next day she would be losing by 120 votes just delivered by the postman, ad infinitum.

This went on until the counting finished causing Ms Hanson to lose the race.

The Queensland Marxist government like Premier “Red” Dan Andrews in Victoria, bows and scrapes to China but there is only so much people can take.

Voters will not get a clean election result until the state government orders a physical habitation check of every Queensland household to be undertaken by interstate, independent inspectors and overseen by a retired interstate judge.

 

Psychological warfare by media distorts election

from Brent Melville

Deceptive media and poll reporting on election points techniques of witchcraft
THERE is an interesting parallel between Trump’s election and the 2019 Australian Federal Election.

 

Labor Opposition Leader Bill Shorten has terrified business on all levels should voting fraud manage to get him and his motley mob of carpetbaggers and communists  over the line

The big media relentlessly declared Hillary Clinton the winner. And “the story” of the Australian election has been for media and the polling companies they commission to relentlessly declare Shorten “the winner/leader” in the “two-party preferred” race from the start by 54 to 48 and now 52 to 48 – numbers all around that zone.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/ipsos-poll-labor-keeps-election-winning-lead-over-coalition-as-preferred-pm-contest-narrows-20190505-p51k71.html
But read “the story” again down to the bottom and note this stunning admission in the same Sydney Morning Herald story:

“While 45 per cent of voters name Mr Morrison their preferred prime minister compared to 40 per cent for Mr Shorten, the gap between the two leaders is the closest it has ever been. The five-point gap between the two leaders is also closer than seen under former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, who had a lead of 20 points on the same measure one year ago. One month ago only 35 per cent of voters considered Mr Shorten their preferred prime minister, compared to 46 per cent for Mr Morrison.

It is clear there are psychological/witchcraft games going on, on the part of the media.
If the mass of unthinking voters are going to be swayed on the emotive daily TV Bill and Scott show, I would declare the much warmer and approachable Morrison with the advantage over the cold and awkward Shorten. And the actual preferred leader polling results indicate that very clearly!

What dark powers don’t want is an evangelical Christian continuing as Prime Minister.
Christians please pray! Including FOR our enemies, that they may be saved.
Also bind and nullify the powers and principalities and spiritual wickedness in high places (Ephesians 6).

By-elections voting fraud expected

 

Can we rely on By-election results being correct?

On Sunday 22July 2018 on SkyNews, doubts were cast whether we can trust the results of the looming five By-elections.

Our Electoral Rolls lack integrity, thus enabling Vote Frauds,” said Lex Stewart, President of Vote Australia on the Outsiders program, where Rowan Dean asked questions about a list of 16 Electoral fraud cases in Australia, while Ross Cameron provided horrific information about Vote Frauds in USA.

It is not just me who is concerned. Reports by the Australian National Audit office state that the Electoral Rolls are in a shambles.”

Official advice to me recently is that the Electoral Roll contains at least 248,000 incorrect enrolments, many of which have been deliberately falsified.”

Salim Mehajer, Deputy Mayor in Auburn, was sent to jail a month ago for deliberately adding fraudulent names to the Electoral Roll.

Noreen Hay in Wollongong is another example of many that Vote Australia could provide.

Also Australia is one of the few countries in the world that lacks a requirement on voters to identify themselves when they go to Polling places to vote,” said Mr Stewart.

Voter ID is required in most countries. Kenya and Iraq introduced it last year.”

Using Vote Frauds, marginal seats can be won by candidates who are not the ones for whom the majority of voters truly voted for.

Our voting systems are simply not capable of delivering true Democracy,” said Mr Stewart.

“The government needs urgently to consider amending the Commonwealth Electoral Act to curb Vote Frauds.

%d bloggers like this: