Category Archives: Commonwealth Constitution of Australia

At least the High Court knows Deuteronomy 19 which saved George Pell

Amendments to states’ criminal codes allowing convictions by one witness cut no ice with the High Court in the George Pell case. Common law can decide proving that corporate policies of each state should  be repealed and replaced with natural law. Editor

DE JURE SANGUINIS CORONAE

By Kevmo, Brisbane
Ancient Latin legal maxim literally meaning “concerning (the) law of (the) blood of crowns” In COMMON LAW since the end of the 16th Century, royal or noble blood has claimed superior status — in particular to the freedom of their body, protection of property and the obligation of any matter brought against them to follow DUE PROCESS (of the LAW), especially right of RELIEF. When an individual claims de jure sanguinis coronae, providing they demonstrate a comprehension of the term and why they should be granted such status (for example–knowledge of the valid argument that you are of royal birth by virtue of being Sons and Daughters of the King of Kings) then the COURT must grant such recognition.
If Cardinal Pell had understood the Bible?
Deuteronomy 19:15-19 (NKJV) The Law Concerning Witnesses. 15 “One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be established.

For Cardinal Pell the High Court upheld Deuteronomy 19: 15 “One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be established.”

Law history –
From 3rd Century BCE Latin lāres = “a group ancient Roman deities (gods) defining localized activities, customs and practices accumulated over time including (but not limited to) home, family, the state, the sea, land and travel”;
12th Century Old English lārs = “a collection of common doctrines, customs and practices accumulated over time; and the teaching of such customs”; later
16th Century Middle English lore/law = “A collection of rules (doctrines), customs and practices (accumulated over time) enjoining or prohibiting certain action; also the individual rules themselves “.
Contrary to misleading information, the Ancient Roman Legal System never considered the customs of lāres as being other than religious doctrine and ancient superstitions (witchcraft). Instead, the Roman Empire was founded on lēx/lēgis (statutes) and later (under Constantine) ilex (universal statutes).
The modern western legal systems of nations are therefore based on inferior lāres –religious doctrines and concepts designed by the Roman Cult–while the Roman Cult reserved the formal structure of superior lēx/lēgis in the form of covenants and agreements such as Concordats, Official Church Councils and Papal Bulls.
Divine Law Definition:
the law that defines the Divine in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum and clearly demonstrates the spirit, mind, purpose and instruction of the Divine Creator including the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator through existence. Therefore all valid Law may be said to be derived from Divine Law. The highest law of all Law is therefore Divine Law, then Natural Law, then Cognitive Law, then Positive Law
Natural law –
Definition:the law that defines the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum through its existence in the Form of matter and physical rules. Natural Laws define the operation and existence of the physical universe, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law
Cognitive law
Definition:the set of laws that define the special attributes possessed by certain higher orderlife such as mind, ideas, knowledge, recognition and self-awareness created through the simultaneous application of both Divine Law and Natural Law
Positive law
Definition:the laws that are enacted by Men and Women through proper authority in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum for the government of a society. As Positive Law ultimately refers to physical objects and living beings, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law
Natural person –
Definition: A man or woman in Roman law as a perverse or false attempt to claim that the fiction of Person is part of Natural law
Personailty
Definition:At the beginning of the 19th Century, a new definition was added to reflect the real-world fact of unique differences between individuals, namely “A set of qualities that makes a PERSON distinct from another”. The use of the word “personality” in the creation of the fictional and extremely dangerous “science” of psychology is attested from the early 20th Century meaning “assumed role or manner of PERSONAL behaviour”.
Who or What is a Person ? Court actions and God’s opinion.
As a young boy at Nudgee Boys Collage, Brisbane, Queensland, I was referred to as ‘Master’, and never really understood why?
Now I’m fully aware that One is the ‘Master of their vessel’ until the age of 14, (12 in the USA) and then through deceit and ignorance, One becomes the ‘Vassal of their Master’!
As you all should be aware by now, the legal definition of ‘Person’ is “Corporation”; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD8ISiJfgW4
And the legal definition for Human is “Monster”‘Unable to ever be an Heir to land’; https://thelawdictionary.org/monster/
Also at Nudgee, they drummed into us that ‘All roads lead to Rome’, Rome wasn’t built in a day’, and ‘When in Rome, do what the Romans do’!
That said, all LAW/law in the West is ecclesiastical (Admiralty LAW of the sea; AKA Inland Piracy), No exceptions; this is why the Bible is in all Court rooms in the West and beyond.
I clearly remember the story of Adam and Eve, and the stark warning, ‘don’t eat the fruit!’! Translated into Latin is Usufruct, say it slowly; Us u fruct or use the fruit.
Don’t use the fruit of another’s creation, as God will NEVER-RESPECT-EWE! Here’s the legal definition of Usufructuary; https://thelawdictionary.org/usufructuary/
Remember, a Person in LAW is nothing more than a ‘Thing’.
Here’s the actual legal definition of Usufruct; https://thelawdictionary.org/usufruct/
All Western countries and beyond have been infiltrated by Vatican UNIDROIT (Private LAW) Banker/quasi Governments, see here; https://www.unidroit.org/about-unidroit/membership
Here is a direct extract from an Australian LAW book known as; ‘Elements of Roman LAW by R. W. Lee, printed by The Law book company of Australia PTY LTD’. Printed in 1944. Not so long ago. Page 47; “Was the Roman Slave a thing or a Person? The answer is he was both. He could be owned and as such was a res. [financial instrument] but he was a human being and as such a person.” [Do the words resume, reside, resolve, resist, resonate with you?]

Fight to reclaim this nation

Our Constitution

Our Constitution was written long ago
By godly men who were in the know.
They knew evil powers, given a free hand,
Can devastate our country, the Great South Land.

We, the people, the substance of the Constitution
Have rights and freedoms given by its institution
To live out our lives in freedom, truth and trust,
To prosper this country and not go bust.

But what have they done to destroy our rights
Telling us what we’re to do day and night?
Don’t go here, stay at home, do not gather together,
Don’t work or interact with your Aussie sister or brother.

Just believe what we tell you, don’t engage your brain,
Just get aboard the Common-Good-express-train,
Rushing to destroy our people and our nation,
All in the name of worldwide vaccination!

This virus is a fear-trigger for worldwide control
By the forces of darkness who will take their toll
Of lives that are lost, through death in some way,
To pave the path for their own great victory day.

Don’t allow them to take what is rightfully yours,
Your life, your family, your country, fight the cause!
To reclaim this nation, making it great once again,
The Great South Land under God and His reign!

Make them accountable for all they do,
For their actions, destroying lives of me and you.
They must return our freedoms, obey our laws,
And stop illegal decrees that dig in their claws.

Do your research people, and use your brains!
Don’t be led and fooled by their corrupt aims!
Can’t you see this crisis has absolutely no gain,
Except for destruction and evil’s reign?

Read the UN Agendas, the GAVI aims, and the like,
You will see that it’s clear they are after your life,
To control and subdue, tell you how you must live,
And determine every vaccine that they will give.

No longer will anyone have any control
Over our lives, our thoughts, our bodies, we’re told,
As it’s all taken care of with expert A.I.
Watching us all with their 5G world-spy!

This virus is a front, a deception untold,
To bring all the world under tight control.
The numbers are skewed, the test is flawed,
Deaths are mis recorded as virus caused.

Many hospitals are empty, the pictures untrue,
False numbers escalate to fear-control you!
Economies are ruined, lives are now lost,
As people can’t survive with their little lot.

Wake up Australia before it is too late!
Return to our Constitution and make it take
Us to its right end of freedom and peace,
Allowing people to speak and say their own piece.

Return us to law and the rights of the free,
As our Constitution permits us all to be.
Repent as a nation and return unto God
For His ways are best, they’re ALL for our good.

Amanda Martin
Mother’s Day
10.5.2020

Australian Political Treason, Treachery & Sabotage by Dick Yardley

Retired Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia Sir Harry Gibbes believed there is no lawful government in Australia

Dick Yardley is a farmer and author of Australian Political Treason, Treachery & Sabotage. In it, he documents the many treasonous crimes committed by the political parties that led senior law experts like former High Court of Australia Chief Justice, Sir Harry Talbot Gibbs to speculate that “the current legal and political system in use in Australia and its States Territories has no basis in law.”

 

Petition to stop mandatory vaccination

                                                              NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST

 Notice to: The Hon Greg Hunt MHR – Minister for Health

Agent to Principal/Principal to Agent – from YOUR NAME and the wider community of……………………………………….

Re: Cease and Desist any and all mandatory, recommended, forced or coerced vaccines including, but not limited to, any and all forms of influenza vaccine for any and all men, women and children, persons and entities, corporate, living, or otherwise, for all childhood related vaccines, aged care related vaccines and health care related vaccines in the current schedule, including, but not limited to, any and all vaccine mandates, vaccine legislation, vaccine legislative acts, and health acts, legislative or otherwise across Australia.

Petition Greg Hunt to obey the Commonwealth Constitution of Australia and forbid compulsory vaccination

Served on:

The Hon Greg Hunt MHR – Minister for Health as representative of Agent to Principal/Principal to Agent on Tuesday, 26th May 2020, You are hereby put on notice as the Agent to Principal/Principal to Agent to cease and desist any and all mandatory, forced, or coerced vaccines across this country for any and all men, women and children, persons and entities, living or otherwise in Australia immediately, until all the below points, statements and questions are addressed and answered in full, and in writing to the below contact details, with unequivocal proof of evidence of your claims provided, to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction, as not only has the use of these vaccines been proven to be unsafe, the methods in which the Australian Government is forcing and coercing vaccines upon the men, women and children, persons and entities, both living or otherwise, is unlawful, coercive and in complete violation of the human rights of the men, women and children, persons and entities, living or otherwise of this country.

We are still awaiting appropriate evidence to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction from the Australian Parliament to satisfy Community concerns. Pursuant to the following –

  • You are hereby required to provide proof of law to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction, that has been passed or enacted in Australia granting the authority and jurisdiction implementing such mandates, acts, legislative acts, or laws on the men, women and children, persons and entities, living or otherwise of this country forcing or coercing them to receive the flu vaccine, and or any other vaccines by way of a copy of the Royal Assent, Proclamation Certificate, commencement date, and dates of readings in parliament of any and all acts, legislative acts and laws enforcing, recommending or coercing any and all vaccines.
  • Pursuant to children being required to remain up to date on the childhood vaccine schedule in order for men, women and children, persons or entities, living or otherwise to receive government welfare payments, access to early childhood centres, access to employment, access to loved ones or family including but not limited to aged care facilities and the ability and rights to play sports, you are also required to provide proof of evidence of your claim, to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction by way of copies of Royal assent, proclamation certificates, commencement dates and the dates of readings in parliament to prove your claim that any of our rights may be infringed upon to enforce or coerce vaccines in any and all forms.
  • You are required to provide a lawful, medical and scientific explanation about voluntary consent to a medical intervention without ‘pressure, coercion or manipulation’ as stated in section 2.1.3 in the Australian Immunisation Handbook regarding our rights, which no law has the power or authority to remove pursuant to and under the ‘right to privacy’ in the International Covenant on Economic and Cultural and Social Rights (ICECSR).
  • You are required to provide us with your lawful exemption also to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction from Section 51(xxiii) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia which prevents the government from forcing people to medicate.

This amendment to the Constitution Sect. 51(xxiii), allows for the granting of various social services but not so as to authorise any form of civil conscription.

This means the government or those acting on its behalf, cannot force any man, woman or child, persons or entities, living or otherwise to have a vaccination or a child to be vaccinated in order to maintain or benefit from payments.

  • You are required to provide us with your lawful exemption, also to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction of the CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006 (Victorian) SECTION 10 Protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, A person must not be-

(a) subjected to torture; or

(b) treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way; or

(c) subjected to medical or scientific experimentation or treatment without his or her full, free and informed consent.

SECTION 17

Protection of families and children

(1) Families are the fundamental group unit of society and are entitled to be protected by society and the State.

By a court of competent jurisdiction of the Anti-discrimination laws, Section 9(1) of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cwlth) provides:

It is unlawful for any person to do any act involving a distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of any human right or fundamental freedom in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.

(2) Every child has the right, without discrimination, to such protection as is in his or her best interests and is needed by him or her by reason of being a child.

  • You are required to show us your medical and lawful exemption, to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction that allows you to conduct medical experimentation contrary to Article 7 in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that Australia is a part of.

Under Section 28 of the Federal Crimes Act which states:

“Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise of performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence”

  • You are required to provide us with your lawful exemption to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction from Section 109 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia. According to Section 109 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia which states:

“When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid”.

The High Court of Australia in 2006 in FORGE V’S ASIC declared that the Commonwealth of the Australian Constitution (NOT the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA) is still valid and applicable today and OVERRIDES all other Law.

  • You are required to provide us with the full list of ingredients and the iatrogenic side effects and risks to having any flu vaccines and any and all other vaccines.

Any vaccination that any man woman or child, person or entity, living or otherwise are given must have full disclosure at the time and just before the associated vaccinations are administered and received of any and all potential harm that these vaccinations may cause to the person being vaccinated.

Typically, you may get just a summary – but honourably ask that you MUST see the full insert. It won’t be a simple brochure, failure to provide the above mentioned, is a failure of duty of care.

Read the rest of this entry

Constitutional recognition finished after flag burning urban riffraff turn off taxpayers

Flag-burning mostly young white people posing as hard done by blackfellas marched through Brisbane in monotonous regularity on Saturday looking for a cause on which to vent their pent-up anger as they fumed over three months of Coronahoax lockups and being ignored by mainstream Australians.

Their destination was Musgrave Park in South Brisbane, a perpetual haunt of homeless, drunken Aborigines and whites for the past 60 to 70 years.

Flag-burning Boe Spearim is a useless tool of the Green-Left wanting more and more from the Australian taxpayer. Pic- Green-Left

It has nothing to do with black deaths in custody but has been a youth rebellion rolled into several decades of demonstrations but in more recent times fostered by the extreme agendas of the Greens.

In Saturday’s ABC footage, which would have televised blackfellas had they been there, 80 per cent of the estimated 500 strong crowd were white.

Without any doubt most will be Greens members, supporters and uni students all plundering the public purse.

A spokesman for the mob calls himself Boe Spearim and he looks like he has been on the $33 billion Murri gravy train for some time. He does not give the appearance of any of his relatives in remote communities, many of whom actually work.

The mobs of screaming Brisbane riffraff, one could be forgiven for thinking, have been cajoled by deep state socialist operatives within the Labor Party and Greens.

Fortunately for a long-suffering, working Australian public these so-called BLM demonstrations across the nation have set back Aboriginal causes for another decade.

Already Prime Minister Scott Morrison has alluded to not holding a referendum about including Aborigines in the Commonwealth Constitution never mind they are already in it. If he did hold it in the foreseeable future most Australians would reject any more largesse for the Aboriginal industry particularly after the BLM demonstrations in which participants ignored every Covid 19 rule and burnt Australian flags.

For now reconciliation is finished.

https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/recognising-con-constitutional-recognition

Commonwealth Constitution forbids any form of compulsory vaccination

Here is the weapon to use against the medical mafia

Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act

(The Constitution)

51  Legislative powers of the Parliament

(xxiiiA)  the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances;

The LNP/ALP duopoly know they can’t forcibly vaccinate the population (any form of civil conscription) so they dangle carrots and withdraw Commonwealth benefits, (some of them are mentioned above), if vaccination is refused.

Take the nursing home nonsense being pushed by Chief Medical Officers requiring visitors to aged care facilities to have taken the toxic, ineffective and dangerous flu shot. No shot, no entry. As we have reported the flu season only starts when Big Pharma starts marketing millions of flu vials for dopey doctors to infect the population.

 

Readers have suggested a fighting force be started to take on Big Pharma and a group can be started when a leader steps forward to spearhead a class action against mass medication using Section 51 as a defence.  Section 51 states unequivocally that  “… any form of civil conscription” is not lawful.

There are several large no win, no pay law firms who should jump at this one. Certainly some NRL footballers have been doing a great job exposing the danger of dirty flu vaccines by refusing the toxic injection.

https://www.slatergordon.com.au/the-firm/legal-costs/no-win-no-fee

https://www.mauriceblackburn.com.au/about/fees/

Aggrieved nursing home visitors and those who want to place their kids in educational facilities but are prevented enrollment unless they subject their poor kids to a dozen dangerous injections, would have incentive to start litigation. There are others who have been hung out to dry over opposition to forced vaccinations and looking to stymie Big Pharma’s multi-billion dollar vaccine depopulation programs.

If we could roll enough of them together a snowball effect would begin. Furthermore there are enough senior doctors and authoritative medical researchers coming out of the woodwork exposing the Coronahoax who could provide all the evidence needed to overthrow the criminal pharmaceutical industry and their bribed political stooges.

Urgent action is needed now before PM Scott Morrison gets his hands on Bill Gates’ witch’s cauldron of toxic ingredients waiting to be forcibly stuck into the bloodstreams of innocent people.

This pre-planned, societal shutdown experiment is entering its exit stages carefully managed and documented by the so-called National Cabinet of State Premiers and the Prime Minister.

This is round one, conducted to gauge public reaction by removing people’s rights, then benevolently returning them one by one thus conditioning suburbia to accept the upcoming, harsher round two.

The most disturbing aspect of the economic decimation, food deprivation, home imprisonment, job losses, military checkpoints and swift para-military police intervention is that it is being overseen by Chief Medical Officers. What happened to our political representatives?  It seems they have been hiding under rocks since the contrived epidemic began.

Are there any class action starters?     cairnsnews@protonmail.com

Toxic Tamiflu and Relenza injections were rejected by the AMA six years ago but variations are still in use.

( FluQuadri, Vaxigrip Tetra, Fluarix Tetra, Afluria Quad, Influvac Tetra)

https://ama.com.au/ausmed/govt-stands-tamiflu-despite-damning-findings

 

 

LNP suspends federal parliament so Cabinet can create a police state unimpeded

from Sunshine Coast Daily

Boris Johnson’s House of Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg has no time for those who believe the coronavirus pandemic is a reason for sidelining parliament.

“Parliament’s role of scrutinising government, authorising spending and making laws must be fulfilled,” he said recently.

The only question for Rees-Mogg is how parliament can sit in the current circumstances. To that end, he is now “considering every technological solution available”.

PM Scott Morrison sees the role of the Australian parliament very differently. He’s dismissed the need for regular parliamentary sittings during the current coronavirus crisis on the basis that MPs “have got a bigger job to do out

there in their communities than they would have [in Canberra]”.

Australian Attorney General Christian Porter says he “has better things to do” than sit in Federal Parliament to scutinise the police state laws being implemented under the trojan horse Coronavirus

 

His Attorney-General, Christian Porter, has gone further, declaring “we’ve got better things to do” than “set down a regular sitting schedule”.

But parliamentarians serve their communities by representing them in parliament; there is no bigger job. It is through the parliament that MPs can ensure that the needs and interests of their communities are being addressed by the Government.

Fundamentally, that is the job they are elected to do.

When the parliament sat on 23 March, Mr Morrison shut it down for five months. He was forced to reconvene parliament again after reversing his position on wage subsidies but if he has his way, we won’t sit again until August.

That is not how parliamentary democracies work. Parliament is more than a group of MPs who are brought together whenever the government of the day needs approval for its latest legislation, however worthy that legislation may be.

It is not the Parliament’s job to serve the interests of the Australian Government. Its job is to serve the interests of the Australian people. That vital function must not be placed into hibernation during a time of crisis.

Disturbingly, Mr Morrison does not appear to think that his decision to shutdown the parliament is particularly significant.

But it is a momentous and unprecedented decision. Our federal Parliament continued to sit during World War I, the 1919 Spanish flu, and World War II. The mother of our parliament, the British House of Commons, even found ways to sit during the Blitz.

And as research produced by the Parliamentary Library has confirmed, Mr Morrison’s decision to shut down our parliament is not a decision that is being replicated in similar democracies such as the UK, New Zealand, Canada and the USA.

Over the next five months, the Morrison Government will make decisions that will have extraordinary repercussions for millions of Australians and for the social and economic fabric of Australia for at least a generation.

The parliament passed extraordinary powers to respond to the current public health crisis. It is absurd and dangerous to suggest that the parliament now has no role in ensuring that these emergency powers are being exercised in the best interests of their constituents and of our nation.

Of course the national parliament may need to alter the way it sits to protect the health of its members and the general public. There are many ways this can be done, such as by having reduced numbers of MPs attending in person and through the use of technology.

The sheer scale the current crisis should also prompt us to consider the adoption of additional accountability mechanisms.

The New Zealand parliament, for example, has tasked a special cross-party parliamentary committee with scrutinising the actions of the Government during the current crisis. The committee is chaired by the Leader of the Opposition, sits remotely and its proceedings are live-streamed to the public.

A number of prominent Australian judges have called for a similar model to be adopted here and this is certainly worthy of debate – in the parliament.

When parliament does reconvene to consider the Government’s proposal on wage subsidies, Mr Morrison should not try to shut it down again after he gets what he needs.

Instead, the Prime Minister must allow the parliament to continue to perform its vital democratic functions during the current crisis.

Senate candidate firebombed for exposing illegality of government in Australia

GREAT Australian Party South Australian federal Senate candidate Gary Matthews and his wife Sheryl are recovering, uninjured but shaken, after a fire bomb attack on their home late on Wednesday night.

The attack came after a series of death threats were made against the couple including a rape threat against Mrs Matthews.

“My wife and I have been targeted and had death threats since just before the last Federal when I ran as a federal Senate candidate for South Australia,” Matthews said on a Facebook post at 3am on Thursday.

Senate candidate’s home firebombed for daring to challenge the establishment and exposing criminal deeds

“One of the guys that threatened us for weeks said he was going to rape my wife and kill me in front of her.”
Gary said the same person ended up stabbing a police officer in the back at Sydney’s Central Station a few days after that.

The bizarre knife attack was recorded on camera and run by various media outlets.
The man was named as Mark Thompson and he was supposed to appear in a Sydney court again in June after being held in custody.

Cairns News has was not able to find any media reports of any further appearances.

Gary said police were “very confident” of finding suspects as they had taken DNA samples off a plastic jerry can the two attackers left behind as well as from several collector cars in a shed that were damaged.

“The police forensic team have been here for four hours going over everything. It is now 3am in the morning. My wife and I are not going to sleep tonight at all. Can’t even stay safe in our own home any more,” he said in the post.

The Matthews were going to bed when Sheryl saw a huge flash and explosion outside the kitchen window.

“I flew out the door to see two young guys running out through our fence and into a grey or light blue Commodore ute driving off at great speed.

“My wife and I struggled to get the fires put out before it could burn the rest of our house down.
“This time they could have killed us both if we had gone to bed earlier as were going to do.

“We got the fire out with our garden hose and a fire extinguisher, however, they have done around $50,000 damage to our collector’s cars.

“They left a red plastic jerry car under one of the vans which I managed to get out while still burning to stop it getting to the fuel tanks.”

Gary ran with Adelaide market operator Mark Aldridge on The Great Australian Party ticket for the Senate last year.
The duo finished 10th in the state’s Senate vote, gaining 12,698 or 1.6% of the vote, just under 700 votes ahead of the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party.
Both Gary and Mark have large followings in Facebook.

Fabius Maximus Whitlam strikes again

Letter to the Editor

Dear Editor,

Nowhere in the Cth Constitution is mentioned Political Parties or a Prime Minister, only a Federal Executive Council.

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – SECT 62

Federal Executive Council

“There shall be a Federal Executive Council to advise the Governor-General in the government of the Commonwealth, and the members of the Council shall be chosen and summoned by the Governor-General and sworn as Executive Councillors, and shall hold office during his pleasure.”

To this end, all Members of Parliament must be independent and to influence a Member in any way is an offence, therefore Political Parties should not exist and are criminally liable for the offences of influence and collusion.

Also, the Whitlam govt criminally enacted the Common Informers (Parliamentary Disqualifications) Act 1975 without Referendum  to disable s46 of the Constitution. = TREASON.

“4  Suits not to be brought under section 46 of the Constitution

On and after the date of commencement of this Act, a person is not liable to pay any sum under section 46 of the Constitution and no suit shall be instituted, continued, heard or determined in pursuance of that section.

5  Jurisdiction

Original jurisdiction is conferred on the High Court in suits under this Act and no other court has jurisdiction in such a suit.”

 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT – SECT 46

Penalty for sitting when disqualified

“Until the Parliament otherwise provides, any person declared by this Constitution to be incapable of sitting as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives shall, for every day on which he so sits, be liable to pay the sum of one hundred pounds to any person who sues for it in any court of competent jurisdiction.”

As well in Common Informers (Parliamentary Disqualifications) Act 1975

“3  Penalty for sitting when disqualified

…. (3)  The High Court shall refuse to make an order in a suit under this Act that would, in the opinion of the Court, cause the person against whom it was made to be penalized more than once in respect of any period or day of sitting as a senator or as a member of the House of Representatives.”  = TREASON.

So much for Separation of Powers!

Cheers,

Brett Baker

Sydney

US concealed carry permits available

Download Your Online Concealed Carry Certificate Here

from our American cousins

As Australia legally is the 51st State of America perhaps we can get a shooter too?

First, if you act fast you can download the nation’s best Concealed Carry Permit available today.

It’s important you download it ASAP as anti-gun groups are trying to get rid of it.

Fortunately, because of a legal loophole you can still download a certification for America’s top CCW gun permit from this website. (And you don’t have to leave your house to do it).

This loophole ensures you encounter:

  • Zero government red tape (and no exposing your private info to the Feds)…
  • Zero lines, classroom time or books to read…
  • Zero gun range time (You don’t even need to fire a gun to get this permit).

It’s as simple as visiting this site and answering a few questions (they’re simple). Plus you can complete the entire certification process online.

Download it directly to your phone or computer in as little as 30 minutes.

You don’t even need to own a gun to get this permit…

that’s why it’s been named America’s #1 Concealed Carry Permit.

31 states have agreed to accept this permit so far (it’s simply the closest and easiest path to a semi-nationally recognized permit that’s available right now).

This permit isn’t just a basic concealed carry permit either. It’s one of a kind… and is available to you No Matter what state you reside in.

→ But there is one thing you need to know…

Since this loophole makes it so easy to get this permit, pro-gun-control lawmakers are aggressively searching for ways to ban access to it.

As such, you’ll need to download your online certificate today… especially since tomorrow this fast-track site could be shut down for good.

If you ever thought about getting a concealed carry permit here is your chance to carry legally. If you think you know some “gun basics” click here and download the certification today.

A majority of Christians will smash Shorten and Greens tomorrow

by Peter Gargan in WA

The “Stinkin Thinkin” that underpins the left of Australian Politics is that Almighty God is elected to the Parliament of the Commonwealth, and that he also is elected to every State and Territory Parliament with unlimited power, to use and abuse the electorate as it deems fit. The “Stinkin Thinkin” introduced by Whitlam, followed by Fraser, and continued by every Liberal-Australian Labor Party –Greens Coalition Government since, is that once a Parliament is elected it has a divine right to govern as it sees fit.

Greens leader and intellectual pygmy Richard di Natali will be going full speed in reverse like the Italian army after the Christians are finished with him and Shorten

However like Mighty Mouse, confronted with a Tiger, it has and looks pathetic when push comes to shove. This “Stinkin Thinkin” has permeated the United Kingdom, the European Union, and is of course in force in China, which on every occasion when united has sought to expand. Donald Trump has ended the “Stinkin Thinkin” in the United States of America, and Scott Morrison ought to be given a chance to end it here. Unless the Parliament of the Commonwealth asserts it superiority by getting its identity correct, and the Paramount Parliament, chaos will continue for another three years unless a minor party, the Great Australian Party gets enough Senators to ensure sanity returns.

While it is a lovely dream to think that we elect Almighty God when we elect a Prime Minister: it aint necessarily so. Bill Shorten inane question to Scott Morrison about whether homosexuals go to hell, exposes his absolute lack even though he is a lawyer, of the first question any lawyer asks, when confronted with a court. Has this Court jurisdiction? The wonderful great big court of public opinion, in which we have a contest for Prime Minister, and lots of little contests for individual seats, is being led astray by a silver tongued lawyer, who presumes that the Australian Electorate is equivalent to Almighty God.

Shorten is supposed to say the Lord’s Prayer, every day he sits in the Parliament of the Commonwealth. No one has asked him if he does. I am sure his vision of heaven is a carbon free Australia, but without a World Referendum, Mr Shorten and his fellow dream merchants are urinating into the wind. The pandemonium that followed Whitlam’s election in 1992, and permanently damaged the Commonwealth, should not be repeated, in 2019. Only Almighty God can change the climate, and with over a billion Indians and more than a billion Chinese, all breathing out 2.5 pounds of carbon every day, only a nuclear war between those two superpowers can save the planet from Carbon Dioxide. That is if Carbon Dioxide is the villain Bill Shorten thinks it is.

My comment is that Bill Shorten made the same mistake as Mark Latham when he attacked Scott Morrison for his Christianity. Australia is still a Christian country albeit under attack. On Saturday the majority of Christians will smash Shorten and the Greens and endorse a return to the Constitution and its Christian roots. Take the five dollars the bookies are offering, because Almighty God always wins.

What sort of a question is it when the Leader of the Opposition wants the Prime Minister to talk for God Almighty, and decide who goes which way in the afterlife.  Good on Israel Folau for sticking to his Christian beliefs, He may have just gifted Morrison an election!!

One question Bill Shorten and his lawyer mates need to answer: Since when did Almighty God appear on the ballot paper? Only Almighty God decides who goes to heaven or hell, not the Prime Minister. Does Bill Shorten believe he will become Almighty God and with his mighty wand end Climate Change, decide who goes to heaven or hell, and create all the gold he will need to keep his promises. There are 17% still undecided. How will they vote!!!!!!

Europe is burning wood to generate electricity, and the carbon released as Carbon Dioxide is not counted!!!!! Of course it is not counted as it is from the earth and when the ash is returned to the earth, the trees grow again and repeat the cycle. A biomass base load Power Station situated in the vast eucalyptus forests of the Savannah woodlands of Northern Australia would provide a renewable power source of unlimited potential.

Richard Marles, Mark Dreyfus, Penny Wong and Bill Shorten are all lawyers, and are assuming that if elected on Saturday Bill Shorten will become Almighty God and decide who will or will not go to hell, and who will not or will suffer from the actions on Climate Change. It is an insufferable imposition on Christians and Muslims alike, and the very worst kind of bullying, to attack the faith of a fellow Australian.

By having Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth the Second the Queen of the Constitution of the Commonwealth as Sovereign, only a referendum can impose atheism upon the people of Australia. The Great Australian Party which is making the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and Commonwealth its central policy, is a complete answer to this type of bullying, and Senator Rod Culleton and his team ought to be elected to the Senate to finish the job of returning law and order, as a civil and political right under the Constitution.

The legal profession which numbered among its number 23 Liberal Party members, and 23 Labor Party Members, and one Green in the House of Representatives and sixteen lawyers in the Senate carried bullying to an extreme, when Senator Rod Culleton as he then was called for a debate on the Judiciary, which are exclusively lawyers, in the Senate on the 1st December 2016.

The Turnbull Government carried out that bullying, by instructing the Australian Government Solicitor and its counsel in the High Court to mislead and deceive the High Court, by excluding admissible evidence, and mislead and deceive a Federal Court of Australia Judge in Perth, about the obligations of the Attorney General who was at the time Senator George Henry Brandis to obtain an adjournment on the 19th December 2016.

Banks and other criminal corporations have been using Bankruptcy for around 53 years to bully victims out of their day in a fair court with judges, as guaranteed by S 79 Constitution, and Bill Shorten’s arrack on Scott Morrison for his Christian views, is a full frontal attack by lawyers on the Christianity of Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth the Second, the Queen of the Constitution of the Commonweal and is part of this widespread and systematic bullying policy.

 

Culleton files in UK High Court to overturn senate expulsion

by Jim O’Toole

Senator in exile, Rodney Culleton, after being locked in battle with the corporate Australian legal system since 2016, has filed an action in the High Court of the United Kingdom to have his expulsion from the senate overturned.

Culleton said yesterday he was excited the High Court had accepted his Constitutional argument in the first step to overturn the Australian High Court direction he be thrown out of the senate because of bankruptcy.

“I have never been bankrupt,” he said.

WA Senator in exile, Rodney Culleton, has moved aside the tradition of Australian litigants being denied access to the Privy Council and higher UK courts by having the High Court of the UK accept his Constitutional argument about his wrongful dismissal from the senate.

A single judge of the Federal Court issued sequestration orders against Culleton in 2017 freezing his assets in spite of a 21 day stay of proceedings being granted by the Federal Court.

Vexatious litigant and Perth businessman Dick Lester claimed Culleton owed him $200,000 over a failed sale contract on land, a claim pursued hotly by Culleton but he says Federal Court Judge Michael Barker failed to follow court rules, ignored all due process and did not look at his affidavits.

“When I was sworn-in as a senator on August 30, 2016, I swore allegiance to Queen Elizabeth 2 of the United Kingdom, making an oath to uphold the law.

“I did not swear allegiance to the fictitious Queen of Australia.

“This ceremony was witnessed by the Governor General and his deputy.

“It should be noted the Commonwealth Constitution Act of Australia 1900, (UK) remains in force and cannot be repealed by an Australian Government.

“The High Court of Australia does not have the jurisdiction to throw senators or members out of Parliament. Either House has the only jurisdiction under s47 of the Constitution to deal with a Member’s qualification.

“The Constitution is everyone’s contract but we can’t get a remedy in Australian star chambers which don’t recognise the Constitution.”

The HCA has long drawn criticism from those being refused a hearing on Constitutional matters, with litigants claiming the court is not functioning as a Chapter 3 court as required by the Constitution.

Culleton gave the example of any senator or MHR who files an action in the HCA. It is unlawful for the court to hear any evidence relating to parliamentary procedures under s16 (iii) of the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987, he said.

“As a result they threw out my Motion 163 without having jurisdiction because they are not sitting as a Chapter 3 court operating under the proper Crown.

“There is no such thing as the ‘Queen of Australia’.

Culleton has asked the Law Lords of the Queens Bench to examine his request to debate his senate Motion 163 of 2016 which the Solicitor General filed in the HCA.

The statement of agreed facts filed in the HCA by the Solicitor General states a NSW Magistrate, in Culleton’s absence could not imprison him for the alleged theft of a $7 truck key from his own truck.

This matter could have, if imprisoned, disqualified Culleton from the senate under s44 of the Constitution.

“Motion 163 of 2016 was a requirement passed by the House announcing that Attorney General George Brandis’ referral of November 7, 2016 to the HCA is faulty and that there needs to be further investigation into that faulty action,  originally orchestrated by former Senators Parry and  Brandis, which was never passed by any procedure of law, ,” Mr Culleton said.

He said the senate could not lawfully vote on Brandis’ December 7 motion at the time because there were insufficient senators present to form a Quorum under s22 of the Constitution and the relevant material was withheld from the chamber by Senator Brandis and Senator Pauline Hanson.

Culleton’s legal team remains in London until a hearing date is set by the full bench.