Category Archives: Corporate Government

Can Australia survive its corporate structure?

by Anna Von Reitz

Apparently, they did a process in Australia that is very similar to what they did here (US), except that what they did there started from the basis of a Constitutional Monarchy— which, as it has never been repealed, remains the basis for the land and soil jurisdiction of Australia, even though they are running Australia as a corporation structure in the international jurisdiction of the sea and are enslaving Australians in that foreign jurisdiction just as they were caught enslaving Americans in the same domain.

 

This, I think, goes to the heart of the Queen’s behavior revealed in JAH v. Regina — of taking the

Political commentator Anna von Reitz questions Australia’s ability to survive as a corporate state

Coronation Oath, and then, three days later, assuming the Chair of the Estates instead of the Throne.

There is something very peculiar going on with the Throne and it may be that the Throne itself has been lost or compromised in some way so that it is not viable for the Queen to exercise its offices, but whatever it is — debt, blackmail, fraud — it is standing in the way of the British Government functioning properly, and that leads to the government of Australia being in a Mess also.

My understanding of the British system is still fledgling compared to my knowledge of the American system, — but it is my understanding that in the British Land Law, all land and soil is held by the Queen in Trust, but she does that with multiple Trusts—- there are the various  National Trusts which hold historic places for preservation purposes– castles and so on, that would otherwise fall into disrepair, parks and nature conservancies, etc. and there is the Public Trust which consists of infrastructure of Great Britain — the railways, train stations, harbors, bridges, docks, public utilities, etc., and there is the Queen’s Trust which includes all the land of Great Britain — with land defined as everything six inches and below of the soil.     As a result, any building in Britain that has a foundation belongs in part to the Queen, which severely limits the definition of “private property” to moveable sheds, motorhomes, and caravans, etc. Finally, there is the Commonwealth Trust which the Queen manages for the Roman Catholic Church — an arrangement that has been in place since the days of King John.

So let’s look at the Commonwealth Trust which consists of Commonwealth land and properties.  The Commonwealth tradition began with William the Conqueror who set aside church properties in England (Roman Catholic Church at that time, of course) and added lots of scraps of waste land and all the cemeteries to the Church’s properties.  The idea was to give the Church marginal land in its parishes to turn into worthwhile holdings using the slave labor of mendicants and others dependents on the Church’s dole—- for example, donate a swamp to the Church and then the Monks and Brothers together with able-bodied beggars and indigents that the Church cared for, would work to drain the swamp and turn it into arable land, which they would then use for — an apple orchard, a bee apiary, pasture, herb garden, or sheep pen for example — and thereby improve the value of their holdings and gain a basis to support their charitable works.

Read the rest of this entry

Scott Morrison’s Successful Year

By: Rossleigh – Australian Independent Media Network

Prime Minister Scott Morrison being successful

Scott Morrison has had a really successful year! I know this, and not just because the media keep telling me what a great year he’s had.

Compare his year with Peter Dutton who, at the start of the year, wanted Border Force to be the unquestioned ministry in charge of everything, had to announce that they had nothing to do with keeping our borders safe when it came to quarantine. Or, indeed anything that didn’t involve leaky boats.

Or compare it with Alan Tudge who got caught with his proverbial pants down and ended the year being given the Education Ministry as punishment. (Just before the lawyers get consulted, I’m not talking about Tudge’s personal life here. I’m referring to the way his conduct was described as “criminal” by a judge, which must have reminded some people of when he, Michael Sukkar and Greg Hunt all had to apologise for their comments, so that they weren’t found guilty of contempt of court.) While some suggested that Tudge should have lost his position on the front bench for any number of reasons, nothing he did was a hanging offence.

Undoubtedly you’ve heard that expression before and guess it could explain why no Coalition ministers ever lose their portfolio when it’s established that their actions were the result of incompetence or corruption. “Minister Miscreaent did overlook his purchase of property in the area and failed to declare his conflict of interest before overseeing a change that resulted in a large windfall but he has since updated his assets appropriately and this certainly not a hanging offence.” Given that – in Australia – there is no capital punishment, even for murder, then nothing actually IS a hanging offence, so obviously if there are no hanging offences, then there is no crime or misdemeanour for which a minister could be regarded as having gone too far.

Yes, the expression “not a hanging offence” is silly but not as silly as the phrase “gold standard”. When Scott Morrison said that he wasn’t worried about the recent COVID-19 outbreak in New South Wales because they were the “gold standard”, I worried that our PM had no Understanding of what the term gold standard means. Simply, it’s a monetary system where a country’s currency or paper money has a value directly linked to gold. The USA abandoned it under Nixon and, in 2020, no country uses it. So was Morrison suggesting that NSW approach to the virus was something out-of-date and obsolete or was he suggesting that it was backed by gold?

Either way, one has to conclude that he thinks that Gladys has had the same sort of great year that he’s had. To recap briefly on why it’s been such a great year for ScoMo:

  • He began the year in trouble, not merely for going off to Hawaii while the nations burned, but for having his office lie about it.
  • HIs explanation of not being the one to hold a hose, led to some ribald comments and lots of mocking.
  • He attempted a reset with lots of photos of maps and firefighters, where he was pointing in a way that suggested he had something to contribute, leading to various media outlets telling us that he’d learned his lesson.
  • His attempt to shake the hands of unwilling people undercut his attempt at empathy, leading to suggestions that his empathy coach may, in fact, have been Andrew Bolt.
  • With the outbreak of COVID-19 in Australia, he got to show his true leadership by telling us that there was nothing to worry about and that he was going to the football, but because of potential backlash, he changed his mind.
  • He told us that schools were safe just before a number of schools were shut down because of the outbreaks of the virus.
  • The auditor-general released a scathing report about how taxpayer funds were used in the lead-up to the previous election prompting the phrase “sports rorts” to be used everywhere except for Parliament where the term was deemed unacceptable.
  • He left various people out of JobKeeper such as university staff
  • He told us that we couldn’t stay under the doona forever.
  • He showed that even though Australia was a small nation who couldn’t possible take the lead or even influence any action on climate change, we could be the world leader when it came to demanding an inquiry into China and the Coronavirus.
  • His government failed to deliver the promise surplus in the May budget, but they did at least not have a deficit because they announced that there was really no point to doing a budget when they had no idea what was going on.
  • He announced a big package for the Arts which we later discovered wouldn’t be delivered until they were back up and running and no longer needed money as desperately.
  • He handled the escalating trade problem with China by telling them that they were wrong about everything.
  • China has now stopped taking our coal as well as barley, wine and other imports.
  • It was discovered that very little money had been spent on bushfire relief.
  • Various ministers showed themselves to be corrupt, incompetent or both.
  • Robodebt was settled, but the government still insisted they’d done nothing wrong every through they paid out over a billion dollars.
  • His government delivered the largest deficit in our history and went deeper into debt than all the previous federal governments combined which people agreed was necessary because of the pandemic.
  • His government announced that they wouldn’t be worrying about budget repair until unemployment was back down to appropriate levels.
  • Some of his photoshoots are so obviously staged that it’s embarrassing, but in the most recent ones, the idea that standing by oneself in the country with your hands in your pockets seems to suggest that one is wanting to be a model for R.M Williams and not that one is a man of the people who belongs in the bush.
  • There’s so many more things to add to this list that I could keep going for an hour and someone is bound to write one I forget in the comments that I’m just going to say “and the rest”.

So, all things considered, Morrison has had a great year. In spite of doing things that would have had the media calling for rioting in the streets, he has been congratulated, praised and has a high approval rating in the polls. Yes, the fact that he’s made just about every mistake in the book and it’s only been the premiers and the National Cabinet that’s saved him from himself. he’s still PM.

Anybody who’s managed to demonstrate such incompetence, with so many mis-steps and such a lack of empathy and not only keep their job, but actually have the media talk about them having a great year, has certainly had a great year…

Coca Cola Tests COVID-19 Positive In Austrian Parliament

An Austrian parliamentary member exposed the defectiveness of the government’s COVID-19 tests by demonstrating in the parliament how a glass of Coca Cola tested positive for COVID-19.

In footage from the meeting in Vienna Friday, FPO General Secretary Michael Schnedlitz brings a glass of Coca Cola to the podium, from which he proceeds to collect drops to use on an antigen rapid test being used on a mass scale.

After going to the lectern and starting his speech, the politician sprinkled few drops of cola on corona rapid test. Three minutes later the test showed a result: Coca Cola was COVID-19 positive.

Mr. President, we are likely to have a problem now, we have a positive corona test in parliament, namely this cola triggered a positive corona test. I don’t know how to deal with it now!

With things like this you are throwing tens of millions of euros in tax money out of the window instead of providing real protection for old people’s and nursing homes, instead of investing money in our hospitals.

The corona mass tests are worthless! This was also shown by a simple experiment in parliament, in which a cola had a positive result! But this black-green government spends tens of millions in tax money on precisely these tests.”

Earlier, the Tanzanian President John Magufuli growing suspicious of the World Health Organization (WHO), decided to investigate the claims of the tests himself. He sent the WHO samples of a goat, a papaya and a quail for testing, all of which came COVID-19 positive.

Because of such massive COVID-19 false positive cases scandal, the Australian Government has scrapped a billion dollar coronavirus vaccine agreement with Australian biotech company CSL Limited to supply 51 million doses of a Covid-19 vaccine being developed by the University of Queensland after several trial participants returned false positive HIV test.

COVID-19 Hoax exposed by a panel of European doctors

The game is up as medical experts discuss evidence on a massive scale. Medical practitioners around Europe are reporting COViD-19 as an ordinary flu but is being sold to support the N.W.O agenda of total people control.

 

At least the High Court knows Deuteronomy 19 which saved George Pell

Amendments to states’ criminal codes allowing convictions by one witness cut no ice with the High Court in the George Pell case. Common law can decide proving that corporate policies of each state should  be repealed and replaced with natural law. Editor

DE JURE SANGUINIS CORONAE

By Kevmo, Brisbane
Ancient Latin legal maxim literally meaning “concerning (the) law of (the) blood of crowns” In COMMON LAW since the end of the 16th Century, royal or noble blood has claimed superior status — in particular to the freedom of their body, protection of property and the obligation of any matter brought against them to follow DUE PROCESS (of the LAW), especially right of RELIEF. When an individual claims de jure sanguinis coronae, providing they demonstrate a comprehension of the term and why they should be granted such status (for example–knowledge of the valid argument that you are of royal birth by virtue of being Sons and Daughters of the King of Kings) then the COURT must grant such recognition.
If Cardinal Pell had understood the Bible?
Deuteronomy 19:15-19 (NKJV) The Law Concerning Witnesses. 15 “One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be established.

For Cardinal Pell the High Court upheld Deuteronomy 19: 15 “One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be established.”

Law history –
From 3rd Century BCE Latin lāres = “a group ancient Roman deities (gods) defining localized activities, customs and practices accumulated over time including (but not limited to) home, family, the state, the sea, land and travel”;
12th Century Old English lārs = “a collection of common doctrines, customs and practices accumulated over time; and the teaching of such customs”; later
16th Century Middle English lore/law = “A collection of rules (doctrines), customs and practices (accumulated over time) enjoining or prohibiting certain action; also the individual rules themselves “.
Contrary to misleading information, the Ancient Roman Legal System never considered the customs of lāres as being other than religious doctrine and ancient superstitions (witchcraft). Instead, the Roman Empire was founded on lēx/lēgis (statutes) and later (under Constantine) ilex (universal statutes).
The modern western legal systems of nations are therefore based on inferior lāres –religious doctrines and concepts designed by the Roman Cult–while the Roman Cult reserved the formal structure of superior lēx/lēgis in the form of covenants and agreements such as Concordats, Official Church Councils and Papal Bulls.
Divine Law Definition:
the law that defines the Divine in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum and clearly demonstrates the spirit, mind, purpose and instruction of the Divine Creator including the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator through existence. Therefore all valid Law may be said to be derived from Divine Law. The highest law of all Law is therefore Divine Law, then Natural Law, then Cognitive Law, then Positive Law
Natural law –
Definition:the law that defines the operation of the Volition and Will of the Divine Creator in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum through its existence in the Form of matter and physical rules. Natural Laws define the operation and existence of the physical universe, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law
Cognitive law
Definition:the set of laws that define the special attributes possessed by certain higher orderlife such as mind, ideas, knowledge, recognition and self-awareness created through the simultaneous application of both Divine Law and Natural Law
Positive law
Definition:the laws that are enacted by Men and Women through proper authority in accordance with Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum for the government of a society. As Positive Law ultimately refers to physical objects and living beings, all valid Positive Law may be said to be derived from Natural Law
Natural person –
Definition: A man or woman in Roman law as a perverse or false attempt to claim that the fiction of Person is part of Natural law
Personailty
Definition:At the beginning of the 19th Century, a new definition was added to reflect the real-world fact of unique differences between individuals, namely “A set of qualities that makes a PERSON distinct from another”. The use of the word “personality” in the creation of the fictional and extremely dangerous “science” of psychology is attested from the early 20th Century meaning “assumed role or manner of PERSONAL behaviour”.
Who or What is a Person ? Court actions and God’s opinion.
As a young boy at Nudgee Boys Collage, Brisbane, Queensland, I was referred to as ‘Master’, and never really understood why?
Now I’m fully aware that One is the ‘Master of their vessel’ until the age of 14, (12 in the USA) and then through deceit and ignorance, One becomes the ‘Vassal of their Master’!
As you all should be aware by now, the legal definition of ‘Person’ is “Corporation”; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD8ISiJfgW4
And the legal definition for Human is “Monster”‘Unable to ever be an Heir to land’; https://thelawdictionary.org/monster/
Also at Nudgee, they drummed into us that ‘All roads lead to Rome’, Rome wasn’t built in a day’, and ‘When in Rome, do what the Romans do’!
That said, all LAW/law in the West is ecclesiastical (Admiralty LAW of the sea; AKA Inland Piracy), No exceptions; this is why the Bible is in all Court rooms in the West and beyond.
I clearly remember the story of Adam and Eve, and the stark warning, ‘don’t eat the fruit!’! Translated into Latin is Usufruct, say it slowly; Us u fruct or use the fruit.
Don’t use the fruit of another’s creation, as God will NEVER-RESPECT-EWE! Here’s the legal definition of Usufructuary; https://thelawdictionary.org/usufructuary/
Remember, a Person in LAW is nothing more than a ‘Thing’.
Here’s the actual legal definition of Usufruct; https://thelawdictionary.org/usufruct/
All Western countries and beyond have been infiltrated by Vatican UNIDROIT (Private LAW) Banker/quasi Governments, see here; https://www.unidroit.org/about-unidroit/membership
Here is a direct extract from an Australian LAW book known as; ‘Elements of Roman LAW by R. W. Lee, printed by The Law book company of Australia PTY LTD’. Printed in 1944. Not so long ago. Page 47; “Was the Roman Slave a thing or a Person? The answer is he was both. He could be owned and as such was a res. [financial instrument] but he was a human being and as such a person.” [Do the words resume, reside, resolve, resist, resonate with you?]

Cook MP Cynthia Lui finding it hard going in her disassociated electorate

by staff writers

Pork-barrelling on a grand scale is rolling out around Queensland during the final six weeks of the election campaign. Works projects, some unnecessary or asked for, are being financed by a bankrupt Labor Party Government like there is no tomorrow.

The Far Northern seat of Cook, held with a slim margin by the absent, indigenous member Cynthia Lui is no exception.

Mareeba residents have rejected Labor MP Cynthia Lui for moving her office to Cairns in spite of record pork barrelling in the north

Lui and her staff have lived in Cairns since she was elected in 2017 and with the blessing of Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk moved her Mareeba office there earlier this year “to make it easier for Torres Strait Islanders to meet her” she told an incredulous constituency.

Now the pigeons have come home to roost and she is facing the expected recriminations from a detached electorate.

Recent door-knocking efforts of Mareeba residents have not gone down well for the hapless Lui with many hostile rejections and rebuffs from fed-up voters calling her out for shifting her electorate office to Cairns.

Labor sources claim their rank-and-file members have deserted her and she has been forced to call on southern members and unionists for polling booth and campaign assistance.

Lui invited Mareeba party members and local identities to her planned campaign launch on Saturday night but had to cancel due to a low number of acceptances.

The sources said there had been no financial assistance from some of the well-heeled local branches who have openly called her a “traitor.”

Following recent, record spending on Cape York Peninsula and the Torres Strait, today the State Government is strategically opening a new Mareeba ambulance station preceded by ABC news announcements of new X-ray equipment for the Mareeba Hospital.

In July the Main Roads Department started a $45 million upgrade of the Kennedy Highway between Mareeba and Kuranda. Investigations have revealed there were no requests or demands made for these works by councils or motoring organisations.

For decades motorists and politicians have demanded the dangerous Kuranda Range road be upgraded but the government chose to improve the highway instead leaving a tortuous bottle neck at Kuranda which will not improve the range congestion one bit.

Meanwhile at least five other candidates are contesting Cook making life even harder for the inconspicuous girl from Yam Island in the Torres Strait who naively thought the people of Cook would tolerate her chosen indifference.

Lui’s only saviour from a stunning defeat will be the usual voting fraud across the electorate. Complaints by booth workers to the Electoral Commission of Queensland resulting from the 2017 election were ignored. At the Bamaga booth the returning officer did not count the 500 ballot papers after voting finished, instead taking the ballot box home for the night.

Statutory declarations from scrutineers were given to the ECQ about the uncounted votes and potential fraud but the ballots were included in the final tally which saw Lui elected as the new member.

Pre-polling at remote Aboriginal communities conducted by the ECQ flying to each community in the run-up to an election is where much of the voting fraud occurs.

It is of note the offending returning officer currently is under police fraud squad investigation for alleged misappropriation of funds from the local council.

The latest information about vaccine safety hidden by MSM

GreenMedinfo.com has posted this vitally important vaccine video for those with any concerns about censorship by the medical mafia and governments.

For decades Big Pharma has controlled and manipulated the media to keep certain truths hidden.

For example:

-Robert Kennedy Jr. just released a book about mercury and vaccines, all science based. He’s dear friends with Arianna Huffington and many in the media and still….he can’t get anyone to promote it.

-An actual whistleblower within the CDC came out less than a year ago and said he was “ordered to doctor” the results of the 2004 study that said autism wasn’t related to the MMR vaccine. It’s been covered up and media won’t cover the story.

Enough is enough.

Petition to stop mandatory vaccination

                                                              NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST

 Notice to: The Hon Greg Hunt MHR – Minister for Health

Agent to Principal/Principal to Agent – from YOUR NAME and the wider community of……………………………………….

Re: Cease and Desist any and all mandatory, recommended, forced or coerced vaccines including, but not limited to, any and all forms of influenza vaccine for any and all men, women and children, persons and entities, corporate, living, or otherwise, for all childhood related vaccines, aged care related vaccines and health care related vaccines in the current schedule, including, but not limited to, any and all vaccine mandates, vaccine legislation, vaccine legislative acts, and health acts, legislative or otherwise across Australia.

Petition Greg Hunt to obey the Commonwealth Constitution of Australia and forbid compulsory vaccination

Served on:

The Hon Greg Hunt MHR – Minister for Health as representative of Agent to Principal/Principal to Agent on Tuesday, 26th May 2020, You are hereby put on notice as the Agent to Principal/Principal to Agent to cease and desist any and all mandatory, forced, or coerced vaccines across this country for any and all men, women and children, persons and entities, living or otherwise in Australia immediately, until all the below points, statements and questions are addressed and answered in full, and in writing to the below contact details, with unequivocal proof of evidence of your claims provided, to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction, as not only has the use of these vaccines been proven to be unsafe, the methods in which the Australian Government is forcing and coercing vaccines upon the men, women and children, persons and entities, both living or otherwise, is unlawful, coercive and in complete violation of the human rights of the men, women and children, persons and entities, living or otherwise of this country.

We are still awaiting appropriate evidence to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction from the Australian Parliament to satisfy Community concerns. Pursuant to the following –

  • You are hereby required to provide proof of law to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction, that has been passed or enacted in Australia granting the authority and jurisdiction implementing such mandates, acts, legislative acts, or laws on the men, women and children, persons and entities, living or otherwise of this country forcing or coercing them to receive the flu vaccine, and or any other vaccines by way of a copy of the Royal Assent, Proclamation Certificate, commencement date, and dates of readings in parliament of any and all acts, legislative acts and laws enforcing, recommending or coercing any and all vaccines.
  • Pursuant to children being required to remain up to date on the childhood vaccine schedule in order for men, women and children, persons or entities, living or otherwise to receive government welfare payments, access to early childhood centres, access to employment, access to loved ones or family including but not limited to aged care facilities and the ability and rights to play sports, you are also required to provide proof of evidence of your claim, to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction by way of copies of Royal assent, proclamation certificates, commencement dates and the dates of readings in parliament to prove your claim that any of our rights may be infringed upon to enforce or coerce vaccines in any and all forms.
  • You are required to provide a lawful, medical and scientific explanation about voluntary consent to a medical intervention without ‘pressure, coercion or manipulation’ as stated in section 2.1.3 in the Australian Immunisation Handbook regarding our rights, which no law has the power or authority to remove pursuant to and under the ‘right to privacy’ in the International Covenant on Economic and Cultural and Social Rights (ICECSR).
  • You are required to provide us with your lawful exemption also to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction from Section 51(xxiii) of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia which prevents the government from forcing people to medicate.

This amendment to the Constitution Sect. 51(xxiii), allows for the granting of various social services but not so as to authorise any form of civil conscription.

This means the government or those acting on its behalf, cannot force any man, woman or child, persons or entities, living or otherwise to have a vaccination or a child to be vaccinated in order to maintain or benefit from payments.

  • You are required to provide us with your lawful exemption, also to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction of the CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006 (Victorian) SECTION 10 Protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, A person must not be-

(a) subjected to torture; or

(b) treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way; or

(c) subjected to medical or scientific experimentation or treatment without his or her full, free and informed consent.

SECTION 17

Protection of families and children

(1) Families are the fundamental group unit of society and are entitled to be protected by society and the State.

By a court of competent jurisdiction of the Anti-discrimination laws, Section 9(1) of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cwlth) provides:

It is unlawful for any person to do any act involving a distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of any human right or fundamental freedom in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.

(2) Every child has the right, without discrimination, to such protection as is in his or her best interests and is needed by him or her by reason of being a child.

  • You are required to show us your medical and lawful exemption, to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction that allows you to conduct medical experimentation contrary to Article 7 in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights that Australia is a part of.

Under Section 28 of the Federal Crimes Act which states:

“Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise of performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence”

  • You are required to provide us with your lawful exemption to be authenticated by a court of competent jurisdiction from Section 109 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia. According to Section 109 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia which states:

“When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid”.

The High Court of Australia in 2006 in FORGE V’S ASIC declared that the Commonwealth of the Australian Constitution (NOT the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA) is still valid and applicable today and OVERRIDES all other Law.

  • You are required to provide us with the full list of ingredients and the iatrogenic side effects and risks to having any flu vaccines and any and all other vaccines.

Any vaccination that any man woman or child, person or entity, living or otherwise are given must have full disclosure at the time and just before the associated vaccinations are administered and received of any and all potential harm that these vaccinations may cause to the person being vaccinated.

Typically, you may get just a summary – but honourably ask that you MUST see the full insert. It won’t be a simple brochure, failure to provide the above mentioned, is a failure of duty of care.

Read the rest of this entry

Two-thirds of US Coronavirus deaths are of people with disabilities

Eugenics in Victoria same as the US

by Sophie Hemery

“When the figures first came out from the Office of National Statistics (ONS), I shared it on my Instagram and thought, ‘Oh this is definitely going to pick up and make all the major news outlets,’” says Nina Tame, a disability rights activist with 17,000 followers on Instagram.

The stats, however, didn’t make nearly the kind of impact Tame was expecting. “It’s just that feeling of, ‘Oh, well it doesn’t really matter,’” she says. “This pandemic has highlighted how disposable we’re seen as.”

On 19 June, the ONS released statistics on Covid-19 -related deaths by disability status, which showed that two-thirds of people who have died from the virus (between 2 March and 15 May) had a disability. Out of an overall 38,000 deaths, 22,500 of those were disabled people.

Tame and her friend Charlie Martin, who are both disabled, analysed the statistics and sent a statement to Novara Media, detailing “the huge number of preventable disabled deaths that have occurred in the UK during the course of this pandemic,” and highlighting the way that the government views “the disabled population as collateral damage in preserving the economy”. The failure to protect the disabled community, they wrote, is “eugenics in action”.

Along with other disability rights activists – including the group Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) – Tame and Martin are calling for an official inquiry into the deaths………….”

Dutton our drongo spy boss

DictatorshipWorld leaders per capita, Australia’s 25M population supports 54 spy agencies watching and listening everyday. All sanctioned by late night government bills passing in the name of national security without accountability.

Dutton is our Ian Flemming’s “M” (MORON) licensed dill.

Dictatorship in disguise is alive and well. If it were not factual one could be forgiven for  assuming it was a full colour academy awarded Walt Disney comedy production.

Touching but the surface referencing your privacy and freedom violation by corrupt government, take heed of the following information,  ask your self the question – “am I feeding votes to a political machine destroying my freedom”?.

 

Information from “Sydney Criminal Lawyers” Australia’s Leading Criminal Defence firm

Peter Dutton

Dutton the Drongo failed cop now our “M” for moron Spy boss, a dangerous man to fear by all Australians

Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton has been absent from the media spotlight in recent times, ever since he contracted coronavirus.

And many are asking where the man at the helm of curtailing civil liberties on a federal level has been in the midst of the current pandemic.

The man at the helm of the surveillance state

Mr Dutton has been credited with proposing a wide range of laws designed to increase the power of authorities at the expense of individual liberties.

Among these, are proposed laws which would result in prison time for those who fail or refuse to hand over their passwords or PINs when requested to do so by authorities.

Peter Dutton says these types of laws are needed to help police catch criminals who are hiding behind encryption technology – a line we have heard many times before as the country’s law makers put in place draconian measures to grant police and other authorities surveillance powers that encroach upon our privacy.

Under the proposals, people who are not even suspected of a crime would face a fine of up to $50,000 and up to five years’ imprisonment for declining to provide a password to their smartphone, computer or other electronic devices.

Furthermore, anyone (an IT professional, for example) who refuses to help the authorities crack a computer system when ordered will face up to five years in prison. If the crime being investigated is terrorism-related then the penalty for non-compliance increases to 10 years in prison and/or a $126,000 fine.

Tech companies who refuse to assist authorities to crack encryption when asked to do so, will face up to $10 million in fines. What’s more, if any employee of the company tells anyone else they have been told to do this, they will face up to five years in gaol.

Under the legislation, foreign countries can also ask Australia’s Attorney General for police to access data in your computer to help them investigate law-breaking overseas.

Australia’s hyper-legislative response to September 11

Since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States, the Australian parliament has responded to the threat of terrorism here and overseas by enacting more than 80 new laws and  amending existing laws – many of them with wide-reaching consequences, such as the terrorism laws used to conduct raids on journalist Annika Smethurst’s home and the ABC’s head offices, as well as charge former military lawyer and whistleblower David Mc Bride with offences that could see him spending the rest of his life in gaol.

Controversial metadata laws too, introduced in 2015, seriously impact our personal privacy requiring telecommunications companies to retain metadata including information on who you call or text, where you make calls from, and who you send emails to.

The problem is that once these kinds of extraordinarily heavy-handed powers are legislated, they are very seldom retracted or rescinded. In many cases, over time, they are expanded. Australia’s oversight body the Australian Law Reform Commission can review laws that are already in place, but it has limited powers which only enable the commission to make recommendations for change, not to actually change the laws themselves.

Police already have the power to seize a phone or laptop if you have been arrested.

Border Force has even more extensive seize and search powers.

The extensive powers of border force

In 2018, Border Force made headlines after intercepting an British-Australian citizen travelling through Sydney airport seizing his devices.

Nathan Hague, a software developer was not told what would be done with his devices, why they were being inspected or whether his digital data was being copied and stored. He believes his laptop password was cracked.

Australian Border Forces have extensive powers to search people’s baggage at Australian airports. These are contained in section 186 of Customs Act 1901 (Cth). These include opening baggage, reading documents, and using an X-ray or detection dog to search baggage.

The Customs Act allows officers to retain an electronic device for up to 14 days if there is no content on the device which renders it subject to seizure. And if it is subject to seizure, the device may be withheld for a longer period.

ABF officers have the power to copy a document if they’re satisfied it may contain information relevant to prohibited goods, to certain security matters or an offence against the Customs Act. A document includes information on phones, SIM cards, laptops, recording devices and computers.

LINK:

https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/peter-dutton-proposes-prison-for-refusing-to-provide-passwords/?outbrain&dicbo=v1-cf027f6fc4f15cc5c16a0336f42e0bea-00f1177e141016af6132f473e71ae24373-g5rwcmjsg4ydmllbmvsdsljuguytsllbgzsdqljrha3ggnbug5tdeobrgy

 

Nearly 5000 anti-vaxxers march on Queensland Parliament-no social distancing needed

May 30, Brisbane      

https://www.facebook.com/greg.ventura.564/videos/154290499485453/   

Controlled Brisbane media ignored largest ever Brisbane gathering to protest vaccination, chanting “our children our choice!”

The Coronahoax and those pushing it copped a serve from the kilometre-long procession of mums, dads and their kids

by Wordman on the Gold Coast

AUSTRALIAN governments had better take heed of a major new protest movement brought on by the Gates & company scamdemic, plandemic – call it what you want.
While George Soros and his highly organised global left rallies their footsoldiers around the George Lloyd killing this weekend, the weekend before saw large and spontaneous anti-vaccine, anti-COVID scam marches in Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne and Adelaide.
The messages were clear – no to any suggestion of mandatory vaccination, COVID-19 fakery and Bill Gates’ global health mafia.
These were barely organised marches, with call-to-rally messages going out only two or three weeks before on social media.
Who actually organised them is not widely known, and media barely mentioned them.
The leftie publication The Guardian gave some coverage including photos and videos from the march claiming only 500 attended the Sydney rally.


However in Brisbane the March stretched for blocks and people ignored social distancing with few, if any, wearing masks.
A video posted on Twitter by a Brisbane Times reporter Lucy Stone showed thousands of marchers quietly streaming down Adelaide Street.
“Police are monitoring both protests and have blocked off Adelaide Street to allow protesters to walk up the street toward Parliament House. No arrests have been made, Queensland police say, despite there being not much evidence of social distancing.”
The other protest involved a small group outside the Chinese consulate, including anti-Chinese influence student Drew Pavlou, who has been suspended from the University of Queensland for two years.
Ms Stone completed her Twitter feed with a link to the snooty “academic” website The Conversation and an article on “5G-coronavirus conspiracy theories”.

The website targeted the “conspiracy theory video “Plandemic” featuring virologist Dr Judy Mikovits, which has been viewed millions of times despite being taken down by YouTube and Facebook.

The Conversation and the mainstream media is using the leftist US organisation Media Matters allegedly to “debunk” Plandemic.

It’s not working.

 

Pastor’s corner

Catch the urgency of this Old Testament prophet Joel. We could apply this to our world right now.
“Blow the trumpet in Zion; sound the alarm on My holy mountain! Let all who dwell in the land tremble, for the Day of the Lord is coming; in fact, it is at hand— a  day of darkness and gloom, a day of clouds and blackness. Like the dawn  overspreading the mountains a great and strong army appears, such as  never was of old, nor will ever be in ages to come.…” Joel 2:1

Early this year, just before the COVID-19 crisis broke out, someone in our Gold Coast neighbourhood blew a shofar (ram’s horn) on two occasions. I wonder if the second time was pointing to “part II” of the 2020 crisis – the unrest across America and now other parts of the world.

Why not take Joel’s warning as applicable to right now?
Some are warning that even worse things are likely planned in what’s emerging as an insurgency against America.
Pray for those in government (as instructed by the Apostle Paul), and against satanic plans to kill, steal and destroy.
Pray also for truth and justice and peace and economic restoration. We desperately need all of these things.