Category Archives: Gun Control Australia

Crimestoppers wants your guns

Crimestoppers, a bunch of snitches who would really like to monitor your every move and a group that supports QR digital monitoring of every citizen now wants your guns.

This mob of wanna-be Gestapo is urging neighbour to turn against neighbour and dob you in if you have a firearm that is not registered with their corporation.

Why any responsible citizen would want to register anything is unclear, but then quite a few got a deadly Covid jab in the face of a mountain of evidence showing how dangerous the jab will be in the coming years.

The collective Crimestopper heads are being worked on by those invasive spike proteins in the mRNA vaxx and soon they will not know their address. Mad cow disease and HIV are imminent.

This mob forgets the most important element here – there is no legitimate government in Queensland, just a political party corporation which can pass only corporate policies at a board meeting.

These policies only have effect on members of political parties and the bureaucracy.

Natural citizens are immune to their policies. Furthermore the Queensland Parliament has been operating ‘ultra vires’ since 1922 when the Upper House was abolished.

There has not been a legitimate State Governor or parliament since then and certainly not since former Premier Bubbles Borbidge withheld the Letters Patent from the Queen in 1998, necessary to appoint a Governor.

Former Governor Paul de Jersey is well aware of this torrid situation.

Furthermore the Labor Party copyrighted Queensland legislation to an international arbitration licence and the only lawful constitution in force is the Australian Constitutions Act of 1844.

Therefore declaring an inert firearm ‘illegal’ holds no water. Nor does the licence you have to apply for to hold and bear arms. Your are protected by the Bill of Rights 1688, in spite of what lackeyed Maritime Magistrates imply, it gives freemen (Protestants) the inherent, inalienable right to hold and bear arms.  

None of state legislation has had Royal Assent, as required by the Commonwealth Constitution of Australia, which is still in force.

These Acts are meaningless.

Only a fool or a traitor would hand in a firearm to this unrepresentative swill. (thanks Paul)

Crimestoppers reportedly records any telephone call you make to them, and usually can track your movements by your phone. Anonymity is impossible with modern phones and they will record your location, personal details and address before you hang up.

Australia has no armed forces to speak of, while China is establishing an outpost to the east in the Solomon Islands in its endeavour to outflank us and move on the east coast of Australia at will.

Our only hope, as a deterrent, would be an armed citizenry as MP Bob Katter proposed recently, to again train school children to use a rifle and have one in every responsible household.

In spite of Labor Party claims industry sources say there are at least 750,000 unregistered firearms circulating or stowed away in Australia. – contributed

More guns out there than ever before

Letter to the Editor

Personally, I have never bought into the purported belief that we in Australia are basically a gunless nation. Quite the contrary. I’m convinced we are in reality armed to the back teeth. We may have foolishly surrendered a reasonable portion of firearms back in ’96, but we’ve had more than ample time to recoup. And become a lot smarter in the aquisition and squirrelling of them.

In NZ, the government only recently had to finally admit that their Howardesque gun recall was an epic fail. In fact gun ownership there has since doubled in only 3 years! and is steadily increasing.

Here in Australia, they’re at it again with the national gun amnesty launched in February. This is clear evidence that we are very far from being unarmed. Currently this amnesty is being ‘cranked to eleven’ under the pretext of “keeping communities safe”. Hahaha! Like the scamdemic mandates and death shots are to “keep us healthy and safe”. Gun holders aren’t going to fall for this again. Most likely only a small percentage of firearms will be handed in due to warring neighbours and the like dobbing each other in. (And it’s highly unlikely that the silly sheeple have guns right?!). But of course the handed-in numbers will be massively fudged with this too.

Why this amnesty? and why now?. What are the ‘powers that be’ plotting? Or are they preparing for the inevitable pushback from subjecting us to even more tyranny? Could they fear that a Dominion voting system rigged election may finally push people over the edge?
Whatever nefariousness is afoot, there’s definitely a sh*t-storm on the horizon. Just sayin’.

D Johnson

Queensland

Australia Day – let us reflect on 2021

Link to pass around: https://rumble.com/vtd8s6-let-us-reflect-on-the-year-2021-this-austalia-day.html?mref=qnz9d&mc=6f8oi

Celebrate Australia Day – Share what it means to be living in Australia and reflect on 2021 with words from the Prime Minister.

WA Labor trying to ban bullet reloading equipment

Once again the Western Australian Government has put its boot into its law abiding firearm owners by coming up with the Firearms Amendment Bill 2021 to parliament, which in its current form could be interpreted to ban reloading ammunition, the possession of reloading presses and dies, and the possession of firearms reference manuals without a special dispensation from the state Police Commissioner.

Smarties of WA Labor don’t have to take the guns, just remove the reloading gear.

The WA branch of the Shooters Union has a meeting with the Shadow Police Minister next month to discuss our many, many concerns over the Bill but we need the help of our WA members in contacting their MP to voice their concerns over the Bill.

You can find your local MP’s details here: https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/Parliament/memblist.nsf/screenLCMembersElectorate

In particular, the sections shooters need to be concerned about are Section 43, 23AG & AH, which define “Firearms Technology” as:

“(a) a thing that is programmed, configured or otherwise enabled to carry out a step in the manufacture or repair of a firearm, major firearm part, prohibited firearm accessory or ammunition; or without limiting subparagraph (i), to change an object into a component of a firearm, major firearm part, prohibited firearm accessory or ammunition;

(b) any type of digital or electronic reproduction of  a technical drawing of the design of a firearm,  major firearm part, prohibited firearm accessory or ammunition;

(c) a plan, drawing, instruction, template or computer program, in digital or electronic form,  for the manufacture or repair of a firearm, major firearm part, prohibited firearm accessory or ammunition;

(d) a hard copy of a digital or electronic thing referred to in paragraph (b) or (c) And then goes on to state “A person who is in possession of firearms technology commits a crime unless the person is authorised by a licence under this Act to be in possession of firearms technology.  Penalty for this subsection: imprisonment for 10 years.”

Like all his Labor counterparts Premier Mark McGowan hates guns.

A regular Firearms Licence does not appear to authorise a shooter to be in possession of “Firearms Technology”, and the definition of “Firearms Technology” is so broad as to, in our view, encompass reloading presses, reloading dies, bullet moulds, loading manuals, load data, cartridge schematics, and detailed firearm repair manuals.

Editor: Once the WA Firearms Branch gets rid of reloading gear it can stop the supply of factory ammo overnight, then everybody will be disarmed and no more bench rest shooting or gun clubs. What is McGowan the Labor Premier afraid of?

Why would Australian governments want a coil gun or rail gun?

Letter to the Editor

It may seem they want to “remove all guns from free members of Society” by dividing Sporting shooters, but I’m not sure it really matters all that much to the powers that be.

Home affairs at the end of last year were calling on public consultation in relation to the electromagnetic weapons they would be importing for legitimate Government use (proposed by the end of 2021)
The coil gun (Gauss gun) and the rail gun.
“The coilgun operates very quietly, and does not expel a traditional gunshot sound. This means that any incident involving shots fired from the coilgun could easily go undetected by bystanders. In addition, the coilgun does not use conventional ammunition, and any ferromagnetic/conducting material may be used as a projectile”.
“The coilgun is advertised as a lethal weapon and produces a projectile muzzle velocity between 40 and 80 meters per second (similar to that of some low-powered air rifles). When using the recommended ammunition, a kinetic energy of 85 joules is achieved. This is high enough to inflict wounds and potentially be lethal in certain circumstances”.

“The Department was proposing to introduce a specific import control on electromagnetic weapons, except where the importation is for official purposes”

“The proposed import control will not be absolute, as the Minister for Home Affairs, or an authorised officer, may give written permission allowing for importation of an electromagnetic weapon only to Commonwealth, State or Territory Governments, or governments of a foreign country, under the existing ‘official purposes’ test in the Regulations.”

Submissions closed 10th Nov 2021.

Reference: Home affairs.gov.au consultation paper electromagnetic weapons.

contributed

SSAA long infiltrated by NWO agents

by Jim O’Toole

Over the past week Cairns News has received numerous letters of complaint about gun clubs banning un-vaxxed shooters. So we gave the Sporting Shooters Association of Australia the opportunity to respond to the complaints by sending a media inquiry to the national office on January 2:

Dear President,
We have received numerous complaints that the SSAA has banned un-vaccinated shooters on their Queensland rifle and pistol ranges.
Could you please advise your policy for vaccinated and un-vaccinated shooters and what element of law has allowed your organisation to impose bans?

To be fair we waited until today for a reply but none has been forthcoming so it seems the long-ago infiltrated organisation has officially jumped into bed with the communists of the Queensland Labor Party and their Deep State directors to remove all guns from the population. Discriminating against un-vaxxed members by following unlawful mandates eventually will lead to serious divisions within the membership, exposure to innumerable court cases and the ultimate destruction of the organisation.

Removing guns from free members of society has been the objective of the United Nations for three decades and we all know the UN drives all ALP and most LNP policy.

Remember the Queensland Police Union President Ian Leavers once said on ABC Radio: “Only police should own guns….”

SSAA members with any scruples would immediately resign and form their own clubs which do not discriminate. After all none of the gun-owning Cairns News contributors we have contacted can remember when the SSAA ever opposed any of the ALP/LNP’s anti-gun legislation, except in the early nineties when John Galbraith was the president. He was hounded by the police from pillar to post when he publicly opposed continuous draconian legislation, according to several contributors.

Since then all executive committees have rolled over to the government of the day. Luckily for shooters Cairns News was being read in 112 countries around the world yesterday so the message should spread far and wide particularly among NRA members in the US.

Here is just one example of the SSAA’s duplicity:

Hi guys Thought I would share the latest left wing news. I am a member of the SSAA sports shooters association Australia. Being a member you give your time to help improve the club we contribute to working bees and volunteer our time to assist others in the sport. However they have made a blanket decision that if you are not double vaccinated you cannot enter the club. I am going to give them as much shit as I can as I believe they are operating in the governments favour to assist with disarming people. Spread the news and get others who are un-vaccinated to cancel their membership of this biased club.

Kind regards

Craig Wilson

Email : Craig.wilson19@me.com 

The SSAA executive would do well to remember the message from some of the world’s top doctors and medical researchers that we have a ‘pandemic of the vaccinated.’ The majority of Australian hospital admissions for alleged Covid infections are those who have been jabbed with the deadly mRNA concoction, according to Australian health advices.

US reader says nationwide protests will be toothless – no guns left

Letter to the Editor

The beginning of the end for Australian patriots was turning in privately owned firearms.

Your planned nationwide protests this Saturday will be all but toothless.

I am an American Christian man and patriot.

Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial is as much or more about what he did, as it is about what he used.     Totalitarianism requires a disarmed populace.

If Christian America falls, the Earth is doomed.
 

Sincerely,

Leonard R. Schmidt     

Nevada, USA

Editor: There are plenty of guns left in private hands, albeit some of them inadequate for an armed insurrection. Compromised former Liberal PM John Howard oversaw the amnesty in 1996 after the Port Arthur, government orchestrated gun massacre psy-ops. Hopefully he will be dealt with by the people before he karks it.

Business should boycott TNT/FedEx freight

Rural Australia should boycott American-owned freight company TNT/FedEx because it has refused to transport firearms or ammunition around the country.

Shooting Industry Foundation Australia spokesman James Walsh said the move by the multinational freight company was a “kick in the teeth” for farmers and regional residents who depended on firearms for pest eradication and sport.

Gun owners and businesses around Australia are urged to boycott American TNT/FedEx freight company which has no corporate conscience

“FedEx/TNT seemingly have no corporate conscience as they have cancelled an entire Australian industry and then move with a hefty price increase,” Mr Walsh told QCL.

“This is at a time when Australians are more reliant on freight services than ever due to COVID-19.

“Our entire industry has been de-platformed yet TNT managing director, sales, Matt Daniels writes to them stating, ‘Dear Valued Customer, Thank you for your loyal support and ongoing partnership with TNT. We remain committed to providing the best possible experience for you and your customers by constantly improving our logistics service offering’.”

For Brisbane dealer Rob Nioa, one of Australia’s largest gun dealers and manufacturers who had been a customer for 35 years, it was “really hypocritical” and a price-gouging exercise that would hurt regional and rural Australia the most.

Mr Walsh said a message needed to be sent to the big American corporate that had achieved a dominant position in Australia’s freight industry that this behaviour was unacceptable.

TNT’s transportation of firearms finished on Monday, meanwhile SIFA had been speaking with many different freight providers to try and find a solution.

Fed/Ex does have a point in that states’ gun policies are a tangled web of malfeasance and unlawful dictates unable to be deciphered by even the smartest solicitor. Maybe regional Australians should stop voting for the treacherous LNP/ALP duopoly which hates guns. – Editor

Firearms registration unlawful

Letter to the Editor

The personal and private Weapons Act 1990 is a private Act of the Queensland Treasury Corporation and holds no authority over or above any person inside the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld) or  to require them to register or licence any  firearm or so named weapon as they are their own private and personal property hence no Licence is required in Queensland.

And further no person is  required to pay a fee in the electronic currency of the firm,  Queensland Treasury Corp  and the fees etc. to be paid into the Queensland Treasury Corporation for the profit of the firm, being a private Australian business registered on the New York Stock Exchange:-

                                               The Chief Executive Officer

                                               Queensland Treasury Corporation

                                              The Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk MP

                                               C/O Queensland Treasury Corp.

                                               111 Eagle Street,

                                               BRISBANE CITY Qld 4001

                                  Queensland Weapons Act 1990

                                       Current as at December 1, 2018

                                      © State of Queensland 2018   

   This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

from David Walter, FNQ

Editor:

Unlawful amnesty

Treacherous politicians from July 1 implemented a national firearms amnesty hoping gun owners are sufficiently stupid enough to hand in any unregistered guns for destruction. The pollies are terrified of unregistered guns because they cannot be controlled by their corporate police enforcers. Surely citizens would not stage an armed revolt against unlawful ‘governments’?

Will you hand in your gun?

What will be the repercussions for pollies and bureaucrats when victims of Covid gene therapy start falling off the perch, as designed, in one or two years time?

Gun confiscations could start at any time because the enforcers have lists of your guns and where you live. It is the alleged half a million unregistered guns they are afraid of.

Will you be silly enough to hand them in?

In any case from where does the federal government get its authority to call a national amnesty. Are not guns the responsibility of the states?

Why are governments afraid of an armed population?

Channel Seven clearly being managed by Deep State after unbelievable Port Arthur segment

by Jim O’Toole, Townsville bureau

Cairns News video in 2016 reveals Channel 7’s Port Arthur anniversary special as mostly fictional and again this week the station jumped into the government sewer with unsubstantiated venom targeted at the incarcerated Martin Bryant

Kerry Stokes, Executive Chairman of Seven Group Holdings has revealed his ties to the Deep State (hidden parallel government) by airing a program that further demonised Port Arthur massacre patsy Martin Bryant.

We are left wondering if Stokes is a part of the Deep State’s alleged child trafficking ring operating in Canberra leaving him just as compromised as several Cabinet Ministers, a few Labor Members, various politicians and senior public servants.

What else would be his motive to run such a slanderous piece?

Readers who have ever viewed our comprehensive gallery about the Port Arthur scam would have seen through the omissions and misrepresentations of Channel Seven almost straight away.

This show is the second time Channel 7 has stuffed up in their lying narrative when mentally incapacitated Bryant appeared in the official police interview demonstrating he was a left-handed shooter.

Every police witness statement describing the shooter said he was right-handed. End of story!

Then the dodgy reporter tried to hang the murder of Bryant’s father onto him with 25 year old hearsay evidence from two obscure neighbours. Why have these two neighbours been quiet since 1996?

Cairns News several years ago published a photograph taken from Channel 7’s own footage at Port Arthur in 1996.

The photo showed one of the two shooters and named both . Nobody has claimed Kerry Stokes is the sharpest tack in the box, so their stupidity could be forgiven.

AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION: Prisoners and Human Rights

“One right of special importance to prisoners is the right to be treated with humanity, dignity and respect while in detention. This human right is set out in articles 7 and 10 of the ICCPR, article 37 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and in the Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT).”

The only way to understand the Port Arthur incident is to cease accepting the official narrative is the truth – the whole truth. Every significant fact has to be assessed with an objectivity which does not have as its motive the setting up of a patsy, but which is motivated by the need for undeniable truth. We must, in Roger Bacon’s words, resist “weak and unworthy authority, longstanding custom, the feeling of the ignorant crowd, and the hiding of our own ignorance,” all of which send us back to the official narrative. As soon as your truth torch lights up, you will see Martin Bryant is INNOCENT!

NSW Liberals and Qld Labor coming after your guns, your liberty and your way of life

The Australian military, as a trial, will be patrolling with Queensland Police in Toowoomba until May 16 the day after Australian Freedom Rallies are staged around the nation. What a coincidence and for an alleged Christian PM Scott Morrison your actions have confirmed your intentions. As far as the Marxist Queensland Premier goes most people outside of the precious SE corner know exactly what the Bolshies are up to. How many readers saw the communist Unionists march in Brisbane and Barcaldine on May day? Thankfully some good Samaritan poisoned the Labor ‘Tree of Knowledge’ at Barcaldine years ago. Real Labor died with it. What happened to the good old decent unionists of the post-war era? They have been replaced by left wing, hairy arm-pitted, smelly, tattooed Green eunuchs who don’t even know if they have balls or a vagina. That readers, represents today’s Labor Party, the culmination of a generational war by socialist academia strategically installed in universities, schools and most obviously the media. Children born since 1980 have been the victims. God help Australia.

Port Arthur – correcting the official narrative of lies

This letter to the editor was sent to The Courier Mail, News Corp, but not known if it was published:

In response to the article by Ellen Whinnett, Courier Mail, on Port Arthur 17 April 2021 “Port Arthur Facts Released By Deeply Concerned Members Of The Tasmanian Bureaucracy”

I always enjoy your articles written by Ellen Whinnett but must comment on Pt Arthur, there is so much more to this story.

I had a chance meeting with a lady in a café years ago. Her name was (the late) Wendy Scurr, she was a tour guide at Pt Arthur on the day of the shooting, she was having refreshment in the kitchen of the Broad Arrow café when the shooting started.

She looked over the counter to see what was happening, she did not recognise the shooter who was shooting from the hip pointing the gun and shooting and not with the gun at his shoulder where you look along the barrel to sight it.  She knows Martin Bryant and said it was not him, she was not allowed to give evidence, the police told her she was not needed that they had more than enough evidence already?

She and the others working in the kitchen hid behind the counters.  At that time there was a local resident and retired police detective with his wife and another couple who were their guests seated at a table in the corner, they put two tables up as a barricade and hid behind them — the detective knew Martin very well and said unequivocally that it was not him as the shooter had a deeply pock marked face, he also noted the gun being fired from the hip and killing people without sighting it.  The Police refused to let him give evidence?

We all commented at the time that PM Howard and the press were in breach of law stating Bryant was definitely guilty, guilt can only be determined by a court — those words led to the condemnation of him in everyone’s eyes.  There should have been charges laid over that issue, but it was ignored as many issues are to protect others.  Bryant was guilty and may he rot in Hell was universally accepted, long before any Court or Inquest procedure.

At all times understand he is intellectually disabled with a mind of about a 11-year-old. The law requires that he must have a guardian with him at all times, that never occurred and other serious breaches occurred, but as he was already declared guilty, application of law, procedures and requirements did not matter.

Whether Martin Bryant is guilty or not he should have been afforded due legal process as mandated by the Constitution and a full coronial inquiry should have been held, which on the finding of the limited inquiry held in Tasmania may well have uncovered a great deal more evidence of frightening consequence to the people — so was blocked.

Two Victorian politicians who were family friends of long standing told me their inquiry identified the serial number of AR15 used in the shooting was traced back to the 1987 Melbourne gun amnesty , the firearm originally owned by (Bill Drysdale from Yae, VictoriaEd ) was acquired by the Victoria S.O.G’s which is not unusual, they get to keep certain firearms and use them for police work, the part that is not okay is the firearm ending up in Port Arthur nine years later. They said it was common knowledge governments were involved — they (politicians) were told they would face police and ATO investigation into every aspect of their lives and lose their seat in Parliament if they spoke out?

The question we all must ask is how did an 11-year-old organise and carry out the incidents — what incidents you ask. So, I identify just a few hereunder that I found of extreme concern with all pointing to a very, very, well planned, and organised incident.   After reading them, check them out for authenticity, satisfy your own analytical thinking to make sure that I am not misleading you.

Maybe I should tell you what aroused my interest: In the press reports at the time were too many giving widely conflicting information and facts — logic is they should have all been very similar as they all reported the same incident, but there were many factual variances — in such cases as still occurs in reporting I take the view of ‘watch this space and be very observant’ for more information will eventually arise — as it always does and the press try to hide the original stuff-ups and false writings.

The commonwealth bank employee that was in the cafe recognized the gunman and stood up and yelled “not in here” before the gunman shot and killed him (he was also an ex ASIO agent)

22 body refrigerated mortuary truck parked near Port Arthur prior to the incident

Investigations that do not answer all base questions on how an issue originated cannot get a correct answer.  Highly suspicious individual sections must be examined in minute detail and those involved tested under oath. Indelible evidentiary material fully identifies prior planning for the delivery of an Embalming Box and equipment to be on sight: and for the purchase and special construction of a Yellow Chevrolet 350 V8 truck with 22-body refrigerated Mortuary – the only one in Australia. The orders for these items the ‘Embalming Box and equipment’ and the ‘22-body refrigerated Mortuary  Truck’ would have had to be placed months before the event for them to have been on-site waiting for the Port Arthur massacre to occur.  Read more on this truck [HERE]

FACT 1. Those who placed the orders knew of the planned event.

  • 1. Why have AFP, Government and Press NOT demanded a Royal Commission and STEPHEN SHANE PARRY put under oath to explain his apparent prior knowledge to order and have on site an embalming machine box and a special large equipment case to be manufactured ready for the incident?
  • Stephen Parry former President of the Senate wrote within: –
Former Liberal President of the senate, former police officer, Stephen John Parry

AFDA National Embalming Team – Detailed Report appears on pages 104 to 119 of said book. On the top of page 104, the name Stephen Parry as Team Leader wrote on Page 112. “I was particularly impressed by the quick response and initiatives by some of the team members in packaging and collecting equipment. The response time and the amount of equipment quickly relocated was fantastic. One firm in particular, Nelson Brothers, had organized for an embalming machine box and a special large equipment case to be manufactured ready for the incident. These two containers were the envy of all embalmers and worked extremely well. I would suggest that design specifications may be available from this firm for any future considerations by other firms.”

He says that the funeral services company Nelson Brothers had: “organized for an embalming machine box and a special large equipment case to be manufactured ready for the incident.” There is no uncertainty in his words. Said equipment was large, possessed significant design specifications, and was made prior to and for the incident at Port Arthur, Tasmania. He knew this in 1997. He possibly knew these facts in 1996 at the time he worked as the leader of a team responsible for embalming bodies (c.25) of the victims of the Port Arthur shooting incident.

Q.2. Why did the Tasmanian Government order in June 1995 and have specially built a 22-body refrigerated Mortuary Truck the only one in Australia, ten months before the Port Arthur massacre; and was placed on sale in September 1999? Why has no one been put under oath to explain why this was ordered and delivered prior to the event, who ordered and paid for it?

Mortuary truck for sale

 The actual advertisement and photograph:

22-BODY VEHICLE FOR SALE

Genuine Enquiries Only

Vehicle for Sale. Genuine Enquiries only.  Yellow Chevrolet 350 V8 truck with refrigerated body, holds 22, this vehicle was primarily used as the disaster vehicle in the Port Arthur Massacre. This vehicle is currently for sale and all reasonable offers will be considered. The vehicle has value as not only a refrigerated unit for body removal, it is the only one of its kind in the entire country. The memorabilia value of it for anyone making a movie/series or writing a book on Port Arthur is limitless. Not only would the purchaser be getting the disaster vehicle, but the whole Port Arthur Story would be given as well.

This vehicle is currently for sale and all REASONABLE OFFERS will be considered.

FACT.2.

The Mortuary Truck was ordered ten months beforehand — who placed the order and who paid for it, and who got the money from the sale of it?

Ellen, now some heavy thinking for you — How did an intellectually handicapped boy with a low IQ organise the following.

1.      Nelson Brothers in Victoria had special big-job embalming equipment “manufactured ready for the incident.” Why did the government specially order such beforehand?

2.      Martin Bryant organised for senior Port Arthur staff to go away on a Work Seminar so they wouldn’t get hurt.

3.      He managed to get Royal Hobart Hospital to have their Emergency Plan in place two days before the massacre so things would run smoothly.

4.      He managed to get Hobart Hospital to have a Trauma Seminar timed to end at the exact moment he started shooting so they could patch up all the wounded quickly.

5.      He arranged for helicopter pilots – usually unavailable – to be available that Sunday.

6.      He managed to kill the Martins of Seascape with a firearm when he was at a service station 57 kilometres away.

7.      He decoyed the local police to be at the opposite end of the peninsula at the exact moment the shooting began.

8.      He managed to fool staff at the Historic Site into believing he arrived at 1.15pm when in fact he was there at 12.45pm.

9.      He managed not to look like himself – as if wearing a woman’s wig – when being filmed in the car park by tourists.

10.  He wore a face mask making his face look pockmarked when shooting in the cafe.

11.  He arranged for a suspect black van to appear outside the Broad Arrow Cafe afterwards so people wouldn’t think it was him who did it.

12.  He managed to get Sally Martin to run around Seascape naked that afternoon and make it appear she had been killed that morning.

13.  He managed to shoot a rifle from upstairs at Seascape when he was downstairs talking to police on the phone.

14.  He had infrared night vision eyes.

15.  He managed to shoot from two Seascape buildings at once during the night of the siege.

16.  He managed to stay in a heavily burning building shooting and yelling at police and get severe burns only on his back.

17.  He managed to have the world press to have a convention in Hobart on the 30th April so there were plenty of reporters on hand so he would get better than usual media coverage.

18.  He managed to make it appear ASIO was behind the incident.

19.  He managed to make it appear Tasmania Police had fabricated and tampered with evidence.

20.  He managed to get the Tasmanian DPP to lie to the Court about his activities.

21.  He arranged for the media nationwide to display his photo to witnesses to influence them; and to print false stories about him and get Channel Nine To fabricate a video – all while in custody.

22.  He fired two shots at 6.30pm at Port Arthur while he was under siege by police at Seascape.

23.  If you believe the official version, his marksmanship was fantastic – twenty head shots, from the right hip, in 90 seconds!  A movement of 3 degrees would have missed at 3 -4 meters.

24.  There are only about 100 shooters that good (better than Olympians) in the world.

25.  US news TV published a film of Bryant running between the buildings — in the background was a large blue boat: That blue boat had left two days beforehand.

26. All done by an intellectually handicapped young man with an IQ of 66 and the mental age of an eleven-year-old boy.

27. Martin Bryant uses a rifle left-handed; victims said and photographic evidence showed the shooter to be right-handed

Everyone knows Bryant was guilty including you, but all you know is what the media printed, as they did not have access to the full files that were kept hidden they could NOT have printed all the facts.

The overwhelming disgust of people within the Tasmanian bureaucracy to the deliberate cover-up withholding crucial evidence from the Court to pervert the course of justice, was so great they progressively released files to Dr Keith Noble who compiled the facts for us to read. As YOU DO NOT KNOW the facts as they were hidden, and the Tasmanian government went in to panic mode of what would happen if the public ever knew hurriedly placed a 30-year secrecy ban.

Researcher Dr Keith Noble On Why Martin Bryant Could Not Have Carried Out 1996 Port Arthur Massacre!   Verrrrrry Interesting indeed.  

A Royal Commission is obviously required to get these answers – only when these questions are answered and included can the investigation reach a correct verdict of honesty to the victims’ families and the Australian people.

Sincerely

Gil May

Forestdale

EDITORIAL COMMENTS:

Royal Commissions are government controlled kangaroo courts where the outcome is defined first, then the appointment of a controlled government commissioner. The terms of reference exclude any embarrassing exposure or harmful evidenced being submitted and finally prepare guidelines for the commissioner’s findings and report. This formula has been applied to all Royal Commissions but in any case governments are not obligated to act on the findings which make the whole exercise futile.

A Coronial Inquiry should be started immediately.

%d bloggers like this: