Cairns News

“What is being revealed in my opinion, about the world of global public health, public health in general, is being run like a mafia. There’s a Don somewhere and he’s got all these families that go by NGO names … world body names. These are like Mafia families and they are using money laundering and extortion and a kind of protection racket scheme to cripple nation states and at the same time of course, enrich themselves.” – Independent researcher Polly St George aka “Amazing Polly” 

By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
IN March 2020 a group of critical care doctors called Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance, embarked on a project to compile research and trial results on ivermectin, an anti-parasitic medicine commonly used on animals, but also to treat COVID-19 (SARS_Cov2).

Over four months the group, led by Professor Paul E. Marik. found and reviewed numerous, controlled clinical trials from multiple centers and countries worldwide that reported consistent, large improvements in COVID patient outcomes when treated with ivermectin. A comprehensive scientific review of the trials is available at the Open Science Foundation pre-print server.

The summary of the research notes that an independent meta-analysis calculated the chances that ivermectin was ineffective in COVID-19 to be 1 in 67 million. By the most conservative estimates, that’s at least 67 times less than the chances of getting a serious or fatal COVID vaccine reaction (nearly 4000 post-vaccination deaths so far in Europe).

The enthusiastic doctors could see great promise in widespread ivermectin treatments and were given a hearing in the US Senate Homeland Security Committee. But FCCCA members were insulted by Democrat senator Gary Peters who ignorantly suggested the claims about ivermectin were a “conspiracy theory” and left the hearing without asking questions. The dismissals of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (HCL), the latter supported and used by another group called America’s Frontline Doctors, have been fueled by mainstream media who have been pushing the narrative that “only a vaccine can save us from COVID”.

The fact that President Trump suggested the use of HCL also helped drive the nonsensical, rabid opposition to COVID treatments as opposed to vaccines that didn’t even exist. This included several bogus “studies” attacking HCL that were seized upon by the anti-Trump media. One of the studies got as far as The Lancet but had to be retracted.

This diabolical, profit-motivated narrative that led to HCL being banned by American and Australian states, has cost thousands of lives that could have been saved by use of both of these drugs. HCL was in fact used very early in the pandemic by New York doctor Vladimir Zelenko with a nearly 100% success rate. Other doctors across the US also spoke of its high rates of success.

Around this time, eminent Australian medical research professor Thomas Borody, who developed a globally used triple-therapy treatment for peptic ulcers, began to advocate for ivermectin as a COVID treatment. In August he released a triple therapy treatment that is legally available for prescription but studiously ignored by Australian health authorities like Australian Chief Health Officer Dr Paul Kelly, who oversaw the banning of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 treatment. Another Australian medical academic, Professor Peter McCullough, is also advocating for ivermectin and early drug treatments.

Meanwhile, last January, 700 doctors in South Africa, following the example of thousands of colleagues in the US, Europe, Panama, Brazil and other nations, called for ivermectin to be legalized as it was already widely sold on a black market. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa agreed, but the medical authorities would only make it available through a restrictive, time-consuming process.

The South African doctors (and others worldwide) in effect sent a middle-finger message to the Gates-Rockefeller global pharmafia and their “only vaccines can save us” narrative, but the South African Health Products Regulation Agency, which is part of the recently established global network of health products regulation agencies, resisted.

In sharp contrast, Panama’s Health Ministry had in January already sent out more than 67,000 Covid Kits containing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine tablets to people who had tested positive for Covid. That’s a brave move for a vulnerable central American country. Australian federal MP Craig Kelly

has been raising the examples of South Africa and Panama on social media and has recently had close to a million views.

“The results are now in, they show that Panama’s Covid Kits have crushed the nation’s death rate, saving thousands of lives in that country,” said Kelly in a social media post. “Panama’s decline in death rates have been one of the most successful in the world. And Panama did this when health bureaucrats in Australia were using their powers to threaten jail to anyone in Australia who did similar.”

Kelly went on to blast Australian Labor politicians and media: “And while Panama was saving lives with these kits, Albanese and Bowen where mocking and ridiculing these treatments – and they were being supported by the ABC and other left wing media. “Nasty little hate groups got their kicks from attacking me for posting the evidence and the peer-reviewed science on FB (Facebook).

“Even today, despite Panama’s obvious success and the overwhelming evidence of the published studies for Ivermectin (50 out 50) and early treatment HCQ studies (30 out 30), both these treatments are still demonised and ridiculed by the medical mafia and their useful idiot supporters, because if you follow the money, it’s never been about people’s health, it’s only ever been about selling expensive experimental and novel treatments, which have made a few billions.”

Despite the abundance of evidence for ivermectin, late in March the mainstream media jumped on the South African issue with the BBC blatantly lying “Ivermectin: South African medics using unproven worm drug to treat COVID-19”. BBC news has been given a massive $53 million “grant” (a bribe really) by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for “supporting governance and providing health advice”. BBC are certainly living up to the expectations of the lunatic eugenicist Gates and his pharma-tech empire.

The BBC’s big lie echoed the South African medical bureaucrats who claimed “There is insufficient evidence for or against the use of Ivermectin in the prevention or treatment of Covid-19.” By any reasonable definition of the word “insufficient”, the statement is complete nonsense, and no doubt driven by Gates and his vaccine-pushing operation.

BBC also quoted Dr John Nkengasong, director of the Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: “They should not use it. They should be relying on resources that are tested through controlled, clinical trials.” He said reports that the drug is effective are “anecdotal reports and are not scientifically driven.”

The stupid and extremely embarrassing statement, coming from the man who heads the African CDC, is consistent with misinformation spewed by Dr Anthony Fauci, America’s chief pandemic promoter. Fauci is up to his eyeballs in pharma royalties paid to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which he has run since 1984. He claims he donates his share of royalties to “charities”.

NIAID also happens to be involved in a global vaccine project launched in 2010 by the Gates Foundation in collaboration with the World Health Organization. NIAID has received $18 million from the Gates Foundation.

And surprise, surprise, the EU’s medicines regulator announced in the Medical Xpress (March 22nd) that it “advised against using ivermectin for coronavirus outside clinical trials”, claiming only headlines were “touting it as a miracle cure”. Again, more lies from a crooked, compromised arm of the global health mafia that makes the actual Mafia look like rank amateurs.

This newly released book by NSW author Margaret Stevenson should not be missed. We have not seen a better researched and current guide about the real Coronavirus story and how to get out of forced vaccination and fear of getting a virus that is no worse than influenza.

It is available from Margaret’s website: www.margaretstevenson.com.au

About the Author

Margaret Stevenson (B.SocSc) is an Australian writer of transformational non-fiction. She published a family history book in 2003 and was awarded first place in the Country Women’s Association of New South Wales Garry Prize Short Story Competition in 2017. She received third place in the same competition in 2018. Margaret has held the positions of publicity officer and secretary for several volunteer organisations over many years.

Growing up on a farm in remote New South Wales taught Margaret the value of critical thinking and creative learning at a young age, which became her accepted norm. Tragic experiences have taught her valuable coping skills which built resilience and an understanding of the importance of kindness, empathy and compassion. Margaret has a passionate interest in health, social justice and ethics and these values motivated her to write this book. Margaret lives in rural New South Wales and enjoys arts, crafts, family life and community.

Covid 19 Pandemic of Fear   by Margaret  Stevenson

This contemporary book explores the origins of Covid 19. Did it start in a Wuhan laboratory and why was it developed?

At the beginning of the Pandemic it was predicted people would be dying like flies with the remainder living in fear of being infected or infecting others.

Fear triggers a paralysis in rational thinking and citizens surrendered to the dictates of authoritarian institutions and governments believing that science and those in positions of power know best.

The mathematical modelling that informed medical and political decisions in the highest levels of government and bureaucracy was grossly overestimated.

The lethality of Covid 19 was based on modelling that was catastrophically high in its estimations. It was out by a factor of 15+ and that’s what threw the world into turmoil.

From October 2020 the Centres for Disease Control combined Covid deaths with the flu and pneumonia making it difficult to estimate the number of Covid deaths alone.

Fear as a weapon to control has allowed the suppression of science of the medical – political complex for financial and political gain.

Politicians and industry including scientists and health experts are responsible for ‘opportunistic embezzlement’ and human life is expendable.

Totalitarianism is on the rise and marching forward at an alarming rate. 

Humanity has reached the crossroads – turn left for the great reset to bring about global communism and the complete enslavement of the human race or turn right for the Great Awakening – a pro-liberty crusade rising rapidly to counter socio-political corruption and the suppression of science.

Stevenson points out the unsuitability and inaccuracy of the “gold standard of Covid testing, the RT-PCR (polymerase chain reaction ) to detect SARS CoV2 in the population worldwide and to diagnose Covid 19 even though this test was never designed for it.

Dr Kary Mullis (1944–2019), who shared the Nobel Peace Prize for Chemistry in 1993 for his invention of the PCR test, didn’t recommend it for the diagnosis of infection.

It can’t distinguish between inactive viruses and live, reproductive ones. The purpose of this technology is for research—to replicate DNA sequences and not test for coronavirus infections.

The author does not pull any punches and accuses the perpetrators of malfeasance starting with US Chief Medical Officer Anthony Fauchi and Bill Gates of nurturing the pandemic and how Gates is able to control the narrative of the WHO because he funds much of its operation.

An in-depth investigation reveals clear scientific evidence proving that these tests are not accurate and create a statistically significant percentage of false positives. Positive results more likely indicate “ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.

The Australian Government has admitted that this test is flawed but is “the best we have”. Legal proceedings in Lisbon, Portugal, ruled on 11 November 2020 that the PCR test was not fit for purpose and, despite being heavily promoted by Professor Christian Drosten, Head of the Institute for Virology, Berlin, and WHO, is ‘not valid to detect coronavirus infection’ and should not be used as a basis to mandate partial or nationwide lockdowns.

The PCR test is a tool that can be easily manipulated, as confirmed by the inventor Dr Kary Mullis when he said, ‘with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.’

In Australia, as of 03 February 2021, 909 lives have been lost, mostly in Victoria, due to COVID-19 and, unfortunate as it is, most of those have been elderly people with pre-existing comorbidities.

Fear is a disease behind the Covid epidemic and disease creates unintended consequences such as mental health impacts.

Stevenson suggests the Great Financial Reset is designed to destroy free will, private property, home and farm ownership.

Covid remedies have been suppressed but she says the hydroxychloroquine, zinc and azithromycin combination has proven beyond effective not forgetting Vitamin C and D.

Vitamin C is an essential antioxidant and enzymatic

co-factor for many physiological reactions and will increase

the production of interferons in the body to fight viral

infections in the early stages of disease. ‘

More on vaccines—Oxford University/AstraZeneca

The Oxford University vaccine candidate AZD1222, made

from a virus ChAdOx1 in partnership with the global

pharmaceutical firm AstraZeneca, began phase III clinical

trials in Brazil on 28 June 2020 with 5000 volunteers and

aiming to recruit up to 50,000 volunteers in the United

Kingdom, the United States and South Africa. The aim

of this study is ‘… [to] assess how well the vaccine works

to prevent people from becoming infected and unwell with

COVID-19.’

The Oxford/AstraZeneca coronavirus phase III vaccine

trials were paused in early September 2020 after a study

participant suffered a serious adverse reaction but resumed

a few days later in the United Kingdom after the Medicines

Health Regulatory Authority (MHRA) confirmed that the

trials were safe to proceed. A press release from AstraZeneca

stated that AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford

‘cannot disclose further medical information’ regarding the

adverse event.