Category Archives: Common Law
ALP constitution says we must be a republic
Letter to the Editor
AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY, ALP National Constitution Objectives (m) reform of the Australian Constitution and other political institutions to ensure that they reflect the will of the majority of Australian citizens and the existence of Australia as an independent republic;
The Federal Referendum 1999, to become a Republic or stay as a Constitutional Monarchy. The people explicitly said No, this is a binding Act on all Political Parties, Australian Parliaments, Governments and Courts.
When Australian Parliaments, Governments, Political Parties and Courts don’t listen to Referendums they enact “TREASON” upon themselves. The only excuse they have is to throw their Governor-General under the bus as he is a Traitor to the Office he sits in, as well as acting in Treason being outside Our Primary Law, Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 as Proclaimed and Gazetted.
From Dick Yardley
Queensland
Petition of Right to Queen Elizabeth to restore Constitutional government in Australia ignored by Charles
How is it that any natural person outside of the private political parties can be brought before a court?
Commencing on the morning of Monday, the 14th February 1966, no politically appointed
Judge/Justice in any Supreme Court of Queensland who has accepted payment in Australian
Decimal Currency for their private services to (the “State”) cannot impose any pecuniary penalty
in Australian Decimal Currency and cannot imprison any private person for any term of
imprisonment as held to -THE CRIMINAL CODE ACT, 1899 63 Vic. No.9 as they themselves
hold the authority of an individual person only.
I refer to the public Seal affixed to the Judiciary Act No.6 of 1903, any politically appointed
Judge/Justice in any private Australian Court, who receives their Salaries and allowances in
Australian Decimal Currency in any format which includes an electronic transaction in AUS$.
Every politically appointed Australian Judge/Justice each hold a signed person to person contract in De
Facto Relationships with the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Government, the Prime
Minister of Australia, and are paid out of the profits of the firm in the private currency of the firm
AUS$, which is an electronic currency as held to Electronic Transactions Act 1999.
The Judges/Justice so politically are inside the Council of Australian Governments or COAG and
only hold the single authority of the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Government the
Prime Minister of Australia who personally holds the Seals of the Corporation
No politically sworn and appointed Judge /Justice in any private positions in any private Australia
Courts, can impose any pecuniary sentence in Australian Decimal Currency upon any private
persons, and to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Australian Government in any
electronic transition or by the use of Australian Decimal Currency, held to Currency Act 1965 and
the Reserve Bank Act 1959.
No politically sworn and appointed Judge /Justice in any private positions in any private Australian Court, cannot imprison any person on the land of the Crown, for any purported Civil Law, Criminal Offence, of the privately elected Members of the Registered Political Parties of the Australian Government, the holders of the Seal affixed to the Crimes Act 1914.
King Charles 111, must seek his Royal Style and Title through the Commonwealth Parliament of Australia, but we don’t have one
Letter to the Editor
At the death of Her Majesty the Queen, King Charles was her heir and her assign and subsequently to be the new King His Majesty Charles 111, holding two functions as the head of State and the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and holding the separation of powers between Church and State held to the Common Law of England.
Everything so far is just show.
The real test comes next and unless that test is held to the Common Law of England then, if not conducted properly the position of the new King Charles 111, will not be filled and the King will have only the power of an individual, the same as you and I and then other 8 billion people on this planet…..
The new King His Majesty Charles 111, must seek his Royal Style and Title through the elected representatives of the people, here in Australia in the Parliament House of the people, which has lain vacant since at least 1988.
Also there is no Governor General sworn and appointed by Her Majesty the Queen as held to Governor-General Establishment Act 1902.
This leaves not only every person living in Australia but every one of the rest of the 2.2 billion people in the Kings dominions and living on the land of the King having no protection from the political parties who have seized power over and above the people and the Crown ?
I refer to the words of the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia in 1985 Sr. Harry Gibbs in short – The Commonwealth is without law and it is the politicians who are treating us as pawns and they are responsible for their actions….
Is it not time for we the pawns to stand up … as the elected Members of the political parties are no are that only of an International Trading Corporation Registered on the New York Stock Exchange and trading in AUS$ worldwide, they must be held accountable to the Constitution of the United States of America.
Are these private people above the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) and the Constitution of the United States of America ?….
If the new King His Majesty Charles 111 accepts a private Royal Style and Title from the elected representatives of the political parties of the Australian Government, that would leave him King Charles in a very difficult situation, he would be subservient to the policies and philosophies of the political parties and could not delegate any separation of powers between church and state to any politically appointed and paid Judges and Magistrates of the political parties, to uphold only the private Civil Law of the Australian Government’s all being private International Trading Corporations who are all held to American Civil Law of the Constitution of the United States only, as are you.
In other words the King has accepted their private money and run … the Monarchy is dead and the sun has totally set on the once great British Empire and we the people of Australia must stand alone…. As always follow the money regardless what type of money it is…
As private persons we are still protected under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) and ten Constitutions of the former 6 colonies of the Australian Commonwealth and here in Queensland the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld).
John Andersen
NSW
Do Aussies need Russian Forces to help us with a referendum to throw out Deep State?
Letter to the Editor
Now that Putin has had successful referendums does this mean that we the people of Australia can have a referendum to return governance of our Nation back to its only Lawful Constitution of 1901?
And then could we secede from the Marxist/Jesuit corporations that have seized our Parliaments, Courts, Army and illegally imposed a foreign currency i.e. the Dollar upon us?
Can we then repudiate all their debt and arrest the employees of the Jew York “Federal Reserve” affiliated “Reserve” bank on charges of treason and National sabotage?
Maybe we need the Russian Army to assist the people of this occupied Nation to hold a real Referendum. Not one assisted by Dominion vote fraud or the dodgy AEC and demanded by Rothschilds to hand ownership to flag-burning blackfellas who love the place so much. Nearly 90% haven’t done a day’s work since that grub Whitlam, handed working Australians income taxes to pay both white and black people for “sit down money” to a collection of bludgers.
As of 1942 and the Japanese invasion, which was repelled by white Aussie boys including Aborigines giving their lives, the Marxist ” traditional” owners” mantra is about as false as a honest election result in Australia. Without our brave Australian boy’s defence, there would be no blackfellas or Australia to steal because the Japanese Imperial army had orders to shoot out or enslave all the people who lived here.
These orders were very explicit and were kept from the public by our Generals and Mc Arthur for political reasons of their own.
When a Japanese command centre at Lae in New Guinea was taken, these orders were seized. I know because my late cousin saw them and was there when they were translated.
When are the land rights crowd going to say sorry to white Aussies and apologise and thank them for saving us all? Or can’t these bludgers see any free money coming their way by doing what is right.
Jack Madison
Burnett, Qld
Australia already a defacto republic
Letter to the Editor
The making of Australia a Republic has raised its head again.
What people are not aware of is that it has been clandestinely installed since 1973
by none other than the E.G. Whitlam from that day the Australian Government has
not been a public corporation operating under the rules of the Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act as proclaimed 1 January 1901.
Simply put, the individual men and women, who were voted into a legal role to
government to administer the civil and political rights of the men and women,
ignoring their oaths to the constitutional monarch, without the approval of the people
of the Commonwealth of Australia, followed an individual man without authority, E.G.
Whitlam, and removed the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, replacing it
with a form of government in the constitution contract, unknown to the People and
commonly referred in its own act as corporate foreign government of political
subdivisions.
The legal definition of a foreign corporation is a corporation organised and chartered
and under the laws of another state, government or country.
Although an obvious government body continued in the appearance of the correct
body, those changes were enough to remove any continuing government from
allegiance to the Queen, the People or the Constitutional Contract.
By doing so, they were purportedly able to make changes that could not be called
into account Constitutionally, because they were not a constitutional body anymore
as per the constitutional contract.
Not one parliamentarian, lawyer or judge spoke out to warn the people, their position
became fraudulent from that day, the judiciary (guardians of the Constitution) sit in
purported courts as a Coram – TREASON.
In 1982, individuals without any authority known as the prime minister of Australia
and the premiers of the States, with no referendum agreement of the People of the
Commonwealth of Australia formulated the Australia Act 1986 breaking all legal
ties between Britain and Australia.
So this country has been steered towards being a republic since 1973 and this
treason and treachery has been ongoing ever since.
NWH Timms
Bungendore
Welcome to Country is divisive, patronising and promotes racial tension
by Cairns News contributors
Red flags are being raised over Prime Minister Albanese’s pledge to hold a referendum to include Aborigines in the Commonwealth Constitution of Australia.
Already indigenous bodies are drawing battle lines between supporters and those against a token gesture by the socialists of the Labor Party when Aborigines already are included in the Preamble of the Constitution:
“WHEREAS the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania, humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and under the Constitution hereby established:
And whereas it is expedient to provide for the admission into the Commonwealth of other Australasian Colonies and possessions of the Queen:
Be it therefore enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:”
by Pauline Hanson
A great deal has been said this week about my leaving the Senate chamber as the ‘acknowledgement of country’ was recited.
A lot of it was predictable nonsense from the usual suspects. A lot of it was very supportive.
Like many Australians, I’ve had enough of token gestures and symbolic nods to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people which do nothing to address the real disadvantages they continue to face. I’m sick and tired of being welcomed to my own country.
We’re all Australians, indigenous and otherwise, and we all share sovereign ownership of this country equally.
And like many Australians, I think these useless gestures only perpetuate racial division in our country. This week’s move to display the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags in Parliament was a step too far, and what prompted me to take a stand and leave the chamber that morning.
We are one people living in one nation under one flag – the Australian national flag. It’s the only flag which should be displayed in the seat of our democracy.
I’m never going to sit still in Parliament for an ‘acknowledgement of country’ again. I’m not going to recognise foreign flags displayed in Parliament. I’m never going to support an indigenous ‘voice to Parliament’ being enshrined in the Constitution. I will never support any idea or proposal which seeks to divide Australia on racial lines once again. That sort of thing was rightly consigned to the dustbin of history decades ago.
What I will do is continue to work with all Australians, especially Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, on the solutions which will end violence and poverty in indigenous communities and empower indigenous people to fully participate in the opportunities which come with living, learning and working in this great nation.
Watch Senator Hanson’s video on the acknowledgment of country protest…
Australia is owned by Australians
by Lindesy Symonds
“An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia” 1900 briefly flashed on the screen before this video and it contains the following information that is with held from Australian children by the g’ment skool but pertinent to this election:
“Whereas the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland and Tasmania humbly relying upon the blessing of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and under the Constitution hereby established.
Australia was federated under the Crown of the UK according the Act. And on July 9, 1900 Queen Victoria signed and sealed the Proclamation of the Commonwealth of Australia along with Her Parliament’s “Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia”. However.
“As soon as Australia became independent the 1900 Act ceased to have any effect as an exercise of sovereign power of the United Kingdom”
The Commonwealth of Australia was Proclaimed January 1, 1901 in Sydney’s Centennial Park.
These corporate politutes and pretenders must go. The whole ratbag lot of them with their directives, mandates, infringements and what-not must be stood down.
When the Commonwealth of Australia was proclaimed, the Commonwealth of Australia was constituted under its 1901 Constitution, not the Crown of the United Kingdom. the Queen’s representative Lord John Hopetoun handed over her possessions and territories of Australia to the People of Australia thereby relinquishing the jurisdiction of the Crown over Australia.
Our Constitution 1901 recognizes the supreme authority of our Commonwealth as invested in the people. And the people must Sack Them All.
(This story was caught up in the system somewhere and should have been published a week ago, Ed)
Every person jabbed against their will has been ‘assaulted’ according to Queensland criminal law
Letter to the Editor
EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD who has been bribed/coerced/influenced/forced/mandated to be jabbed/injected against their will with the damaging, dangerous and destructive experimental covid 19 ‘injections’/jabs has been assaulted and those who went like ‘lambs to the slaughter’ to be injected because of the Governments coercion/force/or mandates; undoubtedly they have not been FULLY INFORMED.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.
http://bmj.com/content/vol313/issue7070/#NUREMBERG
Cite as:
The Nuremberg Code (1947) In: Mitscherlich A, Mielke F. Doctors of infamy: the story of the Nazi medical crimes. New York: Schuman, 1949: xxiii-xxv.
http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/
The Nuremberg Principles – Common Law
The Nuremberg trials established that all of humanity would be guarded by an international legal shield and that even a Head of State would be held criminally responsible and punished for aggression and Crimes against Humanity.
https://commonlaw.earth/the-nuremberg-principles/
All patients should be fully informed before they give consent OR NOT to any medical treatment and given the list of ‘ingredients/components’ in such injection and should be fully informed of the damaging, destructive list of ‘adverse events’ or death that can occur from these injections have been referred to as ‘bioweapon injections’ (but as these were experimental injections very limited information is known and mostly said no data available) for these disastrous injections hence the population are the ‘lab mice’ which injections/jabs also include a most dangerous nano-material >
….A piece of graphene penetrates a cell membrane – mechanical properties like rough edges and sharp corners can make graphene dangerous to human cells.
Comprised of single atom thick layers of carbon, graphene is incredibly light, incredibly strong, extremely flexible and highly conductive both of heat and electricity.
A team of biologists, engineers and material scientists at Brown University examined graphene’s potential toxicity in human cells.
They found that the jagged edges of graphene nanoparticles, super sharp and super strong, easily pierced through cell membranes in human lung, skin and immune cells, suggesting the potential to do serious damage in humans and other animals.
more > https://newatlas.com/graphene-bad-for-environment-toxic-for-humans/31851/
Queensland Consolidated Acts
CRIMINAL CODE 1899 – SECT 245
assault
245 assault
(1) A person who strikes, touches, or moves, or otherwise applies force of any kind to, the person of another, either directly or indirectly, without the other person’s consent, or with the other person’s consent if the consent is obtained by fraud, or who by any bodily act or gesture attempts or threatens to apply force of any kind to the person of another without the other person’s consent, under such circumstances that the person making the attempt or threat has actually or apparently a present ability to effect the person’s purpose, is said to assault that other person, and the act is called an
“assault” .
(2) In this section—
“applies force” includes the case of applying heat, light, electrical force, gas, odour, or any other substance or thing whatever if applied in such a degree as to cause injury or personal discomfort.
http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_act/cc189994/s245.html#applies_force
from Diane Drayton Buckland
Queensland
Greg Hunt delegate to WHO – being taken over by PPP’s, or being corporatised
by Alison Ryan, investigative reporter
Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger worked for the WHO for 20 years. She presented whistle-blower testimony in the Grand Jury, Day 2, Part 6.
Grand Jury – Day 2 Part 6 – Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger and Dr. Sylvia Berendt – Testimony
In her testimony Dr. Stuckelberger states that the WHO Inter-governmental Panel for Treaty on Preparedness and Response “is problematic”. More on this later involving Mr Greg Hunt.
Dr. Stuckelberger reveals that Public Private Partnerships are taking over the WHO. The Global Health Security Agenda was implemented by private entities which is very undemocratic.
She states that the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) is under the authority of WHO and covers four categories – Infection’s biology/food borne biology/chemical biology/radio nuclear radiation and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) – however Dr. Stuckelberger says that the IAEA has power over WHO.
The IAEA operates in Australia through DFAT. See:
https://www.dfat.gov.au/international-relations/security/non-proliferation-disarmament-arms-control/IAEA-peaceful-nuclear-uses/Pages/international-atomic-energy-agency
Dr. Stuckelberger reveals that IAEA is in charge of the RTPCR kit and whilst IAEA is independent from the UN it has its own International Treaty and reports to the UN General Assembly and the UN Security Council every year.
She states that IAEA has developed nuclear derived diagnostic technology to detect and identify covid in hours in humans and in animals. Is it any wonder then that the Treaty on Preparedness and Response, mentioned earlier, recognises a “One Health” approach by connecting the health of humans, animals and our planet together.
Dr. Stuckelberger says that the City of London – big finance – is getting control of WHO. She states that world NGOs – British – and CDC military are in control.
On 1 December 2021 the Treaty on Preparedness and Response, mentioned by Dr Stuckelberger, was agreed to by the 194 members of WHO to be constituted and to hold its first meeting by 1 March 2022.
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/coronavirus/pandemic-treaty/
The long list of Australian delegates to that meeting on 1 Dec 2021 were:
Chief delegate – Mr G. Hunt, Minister for Health and Aged Care
Deputy chief delegate – Dr B. Murphy, Secretary, Department of Health
Delegate(s) – Mr P. McBride, Deputy Secretary, Department of Health
Alternate(s) – Ms B. Field, First Assistant Secretary, Portfolio Strategies Division, Department of Health
Ms S. Mansfield, Ambassador, Permanent Representative, Geneva
Mr T. Power, Assistant Secretary, International Strategies Branch, Department of Health
Ms K. Wallace, Assistant Secretary, Global Health Policy Branch, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Mr J. Roach, Deputy Permanent Representative, Geneva
Ms M. Heyward, Health Adviser, Permanent Mission, Geneva
Mr J. Acacio, Health Adviser, Permanent Mission, Geneva
Ms C. Sturrock, Counsellor Health and Environment, Permanent Mission, Geneva
Dr T. Poletti, Health Adviser, Permanent Mission, Geneva
Mr A. Bharadwaj, Director, International Strategies Branch, Department of Health
Ms S. Falconer, Director, International Strategies Branch, Department of Health
Ms S. Ferguson, Director, Global Health Policy Branch, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Ms K. Barnes, Assistant Director, International Strategies Branch, Department of Health
Mr A. Kerslake, Assistant Director, International Strategies Branch, Department of Health
Ms L. Rohan-Jones, Assistant Director, International Strategies Branch, Department of Health
Ms D. Simpson, Assistant Director, Global Health Policy Branch, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Ms S. Mulder-Jones, Policy Officer, Global Health Policy Branch, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Ms E. Martin Avila, Policy Officer, Global Health Policy Branch, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
https://apps.who.int/gb/e/e_whassa2.html
*Chief delegate was Mr Greg Hunt, Minister for Health and Aged Care.
Today is decimal currency anniversary, 56 years ago when the dollar began
How did the federal government of Liberal PM Harold Holt in 1966 change over our currency to dollars without referendum because the currency in our Commonwealth Constitution Act 1901 remains in pounds.
We will be publishing more on this anomaly soon.
Cairns News 