Category Archives: Queen Elizabeth
Harry is a train wreck and could be a loose cannon
By Lyndesy Symonds
I’ll bet Harry knows plenty about the family gig and its deal with The Crown – namely the Judaic Supremacy and its imperium which owns the consols of the Bank of England. This is the foundation of their central banking cartel which now owns all nations welded to their seats in the UN as assets of the corporate structure of their CBC.
Harry is a train wreck and not even a politically correct marriage to an American Black is going to save him from the The Owners of his country and their Marxist Culture Wars and Revolutionary Assets.
The Owners won the War of the Succession 1688 – 1746. This essential information is contained in a too little known work by Capt Archibald Maule Ramsay “The Nameless War”
Click to access Ramsay%20AHM%20-%20The_Nameless_War.pdf
Since that time the British monarchy or the monarchy of the UK plays a largely ceremonial role of influence and intrigue also the breeding stock for the Owners.
In law, The Owners and their Maritime Law (which they brought in with the Charter of the Bank of England under the Tonnage Act 1694 ) ‘colours of law’ and legal fictions have not yet extinguished the Westminster jurisprudence from its Older Foundation laid by the English Kings in the Holy Roman Empire -this includes the Dooms, the Magna Charta etc.
And even at the end its last defenses are still very strong not only for the nations of the UK but the Western nations founded in the blood price of those nations. That should worry them.
King Charles 111, must seek his Royal Style and Title through the Commonwealth Parliament of Australia, but we don’t have one
Letter to the Editor
At the death of Her Majesty the Queen, King Charles was her heir and her assign and subsequently to be the new King His Majesty Charles 111, holding two functions as the head of State and the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and holding the separation of powers between Church and State held to the Common Law of England.
Everything so far is just show.
The real test comes next and unless that test is held to the Common Law of England then, if not conducted properly the position of the new King Charles 111, will not be filled and the King will have only the power of an individual, the same as you and I and then other 8 billion people on this planet…..
The new King His Majesty Charles 111, must seek his Royal Style and Title through the elected representatives of the people, here in Australia in the Parliament House of the people, which has lain vacant since at least 1988.
Also there is no Governor General sworn and appointed by Her Majesty the Queen as held to Governor-General Establishment Act 1902.
This leaves not only every person living in Australia but every one of the rest of the 2.2 billion people in the Kings dominions and living on the land of the King having no protection from the political parties who have seized power over and above the people and the Crown ?
I refer to the words of the Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia in 1985 Sr. Harry Gibbs in short – The Commonwealth is without law and it is the politicians who are treating us as pawns and they are responsible for their actions….
Is it not time for we the pawns to stand up … as the elected Members of the political parties are no are that only of an International Trading Corporation Registered on the New York Stock Exchange and trading in AUS$ worldwide, they must be held accountable to the Constitution of the United States of America.
Are these private people above the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) and the Constitution of the United States of America ?….
If the new King His Majesty Charles 111 accepts a private Royal Style and Title from the elected representatives of the political parties of the Australian Government, that would leave him King Charles in a very difficult situation, he would be subservient to the policies and philosophies of the political parties and could not delegate any separation of powers between church and state to any politically appointed and paid Judges and Magistrates of the political parties, to uphold only the private Civil Law of the Australian Government’s all being private International Trading Corporations who are all held to American Civil Law of the Constitution of the United States only, as are you.
In other words the King has accepted their private money and run … the Monarchy is dead and the sun has totally set on the once great British Empire and we the people of Australia must stand alone…. As always follow the money regardless what type of money it is…
As private persons we are still protected under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) and ten Constitutions of the former 6 colonies of the Australian Commonwealth and here in Queensland the Constitution Act 1867 (Qld).
Pakistani rape gangs allowed by UK government
by columnist Lyndesy Symonds and Cairns News
In the UK, the Pakistani rape / grooming gangs were permitted and enabled by the UK government and social services to operate across the North for decades and traffick English girls. All the civil authorities, clinics, hospitals, social workers, police, justice departments covered for them and enabled them to prey upon these girls. The Big Jew MSM (of course) said nothing. The government did nothing. They are the enemies of the English, Scottish, Irish and Cymric peoples. Male relatives who attempted to protect them were ‘dealt with’ by the system.
Labour MP fired for exposing rape gangs
by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart:
“A Labour MP fired from the shadow government by Jeremy Corbyn for calling out Pakistani-heritage rapists targeting white girls will help review a government report into the ethnic background of grooming gangs.
Sarah Champion, MP for the rape gang-blighted town of Rotherham, Yorkshire, will help to review a government report into the “characteristics” of grooming gangs, which have repeatedly been found to be made up overwhelmingly of Muslim men, usually of Pakistani heritage victimising overwhelmingly non-Muslim girls, usually white working class.
Champion was one of the few figures on the political left to call for the racial elements of the grooming gangs phenomenon to be confronted — elements which saw the crimes ignored by police, social workers, and other authority figures for years because they feared being accused of racism if they tackled them.
“Britain has a problem with British Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls. There. I said it. Does that make me a racist? Or am I just prepared to call out this horrifying problem for what it is?” Champion wrote in an article for the right-leaning Sun in 2017.”
Europe has been undergoing this ordeal for decades – imposed entirely upon the European nations by the Overlords.
Australians should know that under ‘Lord Mandelson’ immigration policies, the tsunamis of migrant populations are entitled to crime. The population is not permitted to fight back. Right to self defense is criminalised by the Communist state.
Here is the 60 minutes crew getting attacked in Sweden as soon as the Swedish police leave. March 22 2016
Queen Elizabeth leaves some not so fond memories
by columnist Lyndesy Symonds
Yes, it is important to determine the question of who are the families of the sovereign money power that established the Empire of the City of London Corporation on its Joint Stock Co. of the Bank of England 1694. ( If only because all 193 UN member nations are today owned as corporate assets of their central banking cartel ). All of that is back on another post.
For me, this post from the Part Time Philospher opens up the more important question of : the Australians in heritage and founding stock. This nation of distinct Celtic, English, Scottish and Danish people which , as a population, became the founding stock of the Australian state from its beginnings in the UK penal colony of Botany Bay in the arrival of the First Fleet: 20 Jan 1788 . Who are these people established as convicts on this continent under the Admiralty Law of the UK and what became the British Empire?
The event of the transport occurred in the distinct time frame of English history when the Westminster system of law and government laid by St Edward the Confessor in the 10th century had entered into its mortal conflict with the sovereign money power based in The City of London Corporation. And even then, the older system was being extinguished. Even so, even at the end with all institutions entirely subverted, the last defenses of Westminster would prove very strong as we have seen in the last century and our own day.
Forget ideas about cutting the swell in the well known Old Bailey and stealing the loaf of bread and go back to the War of the Succession also called the War of the Three Kingdoms 1688 – 1746 (Culloden) – and its antecedent the English Civil War 1642 / Irish Confederate Wars 1641-1657. That is when Regime Change occurred in the nations I am talking about.
And here is the focus. Every nation (if it is a nation) and without exception has its own natural and spiritual aristocracy. This distinct group is not necessarily the king or the state or the nobility with position and title or whatever. But there are times in history when the events of the times will select for that particular group and cause them to stand and be recognized across all classes.
Even centuries later in the pages of history written by their enemies they can be identified and seen for exactly who they are: the strongest bloodstock of the nation, the most based in their culture, law and traditions – especially their faith, the most resilient and determined against the foes of their nation, the most adaptable and canny. If their nation is defeated in war and their foes take possession by right of conquest – they are going to be the most ungovernable and hostile to the new regime.
These people are the natural aristocracy of the nation, any nation.
So in the War of the Succession, when usury became the basis of the economy and the Bank of England created a whole new landlord class with new fangled title deeds, the Commons of the new estates were closed (again) by Act of Parliament. The English who have been living in their parishes on those estates since the time of the Roman Empire were being impressed into the Navy or herded into the industrial slums or the collieries of the UK.
But among them , there remained that distinct group of English who didn’t exactly accept the terms of the Parliamentarian surrender of 1688 and resisted the new normal by every means. They closed down sweatshops and fortified the shambles against the impressment gangs. Then there were the Irish – the whole nation under penal law – a tax on all lands, even every tool and implement of trade, even every window of every house. The wearing of the Green was illegal – a hanging offense. Again, most people are going to do what they have to do to survive. But from among them, another and quite distinct group is also apparent.
This is the group which goes their hangings singing rowdy songs wearing the Green, they organise themselves to seize the tax monies from the new landlord class and they continue to oppose the new regime. They haven’t surrendered either . And up in Scotland the story is pretty much the same. It matters not a jot that the Scottish Convention of Estates is now part of the UK and the Highlands are supposed to be surrendered after Culloden – where the Clans fought with no quarter.
But for the government, the problem with the Highlands continued. In order to pasture the Cheviot sheep, the new UK landlord class had to clear the Highlands of its parishes and villages by fire, musket and sword. Inevitably they came into conflict with that distinct and particular group which makes it their responsibility to insure this is no easy matter for King Willie’s muskets. They ambush them in the bye-ways, kill the cheviots and generally make life hell for the new landlord class and their titles.
Thus, the natural aristocracy of England, Ireland, Britain and Scotland – bloodied but unbowed after the War of the Succession. What solution to the problem of the natural aristocracy of these nations might the UK have hit upon ?