Category Archives: Courts
by * John Grey
Monica Smit spent 21 days in Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second accommodation in Victoria. The State of Victoria now owes her $2,700,000 for each day she spent in involuntary confinement. I see the Australian Cossack Simeon has likewise been arrested in Sydney. The only reason this is happening is that the Federal Court of Australia is an organization that is a Court in name only but in fact is a branch of the Scott Morrison Intimidation Organisation called the Australian Government. It is staffed by serial criminal offenders, whose purpose and object in life is to refuse to deliver justice to the subjects of the Queen of the Constitution resident in the Commonwealth of Australia.
Here is how she earned her $2,772,000 a day while in custody. When arrested she was protected by S 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth) which defines a crime against humanity as imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty. It incorporates Articles 9, 14 and 15 of the International Covenant on civil and political rights into the Laws of the Commonwealth and sets a penalty of seventeen years imprisonment for a breach of it. Seventeen years is 204 months, and the formula to calculate the liquidated demand that arises daily under the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) is in S 4B , and S 4K Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) states that it accrues daily while the offence continues. Each month accrues five penalty units, that is 204 months by five and equals 1,020 penalty units. That means that the Police who detained her, accrued the sum of $214,200 for the first day, and those who continued her incarceration without a trial first had accrued the same every day she was there.
However the real criminal is the State of Victoria which by S 64 Judiciary Act 1903 is declared a subject of the Queen of the Constitution exactly the same as Monica Smit is, and liable as a Body Corporate to five times the penalty an individual accrues as imprisonment cannot be inflicted upon a corporation. S the State of Victoria for each day accrued $1.071.000 and that is not the end of it. Because the State of Victoria has no CH III Constitution Courts and the Magistrate refused to grant her bail, it offended S 43 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) for the whole time she was in there and that accrues ten years imprisonment. Ten years imprisonment accrues $126,000 for an individual and $630,000 for the State of Victoria per day.
Once a Proscribed inhumane act is committed in breach of S 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth), S 268:20 Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth) applies as Monica Smit was persecuted for her political activism. That is another seventeen years imprisonment. Another $1,071,000 per day. So the total per day, is $2,772,000 for every day she was imprisoned arbitrarily.
The 21 days she spent in involuntary hospitality, means that the Total Bill the State of Victoria has accrued, is $58,212,000. They should be sent an invoice for that amount. The Police when they become aware that they have or are likely to lose their Superannuation and salary if they continue to obey illegal Orders, will almost certainly rebel.
Then we come to the Federal Court of Australia. On the 7th November 2016 they made the Federal Court ( Criminal Practice ) Rules 2016. In those Rules are Form CP14 and CP15. An indictment and Notice of Indictment. In Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, these prescribed forms have been lodged with the Federal Court of Australia and in each Capital City a Judicial Registrar has refused to let them be issued. This is a crime against S 43 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) and all the Judges as well as the Registrars who are the actual offenders are caught by S 11.2 Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth) Anyone who aids abets counsels or procures the commission of a crime is guilty of that crime. S 43 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) makes it a crime to attempt to obstruct, prevent, pervert or to defeat the course of justice in relation to a judicial power of the Commonwealth. If the Commonwealth Attorney General and Home Affairs Minister and Commissioner Australian Federal Police do not Act to enforce these laws, they are likely to be forever disqualified from the Parliament of the Commonwealth, and lose a salary of around $800,000 per annum in the case of the Commissioner.
The Attorney General can indict Daniel Andrews, Annastacia Paluszczuk and Perrotet, under S 71A Judiciary Act 1903 without prior committal hearings, and every Premier and the Prime Minister Morrison are guilty as members of the so called National Cabinet.
However, the whole house of cards that is presently the Commonwealth may be about to collapse. Gesara-Nesara was started on the 1st October 2021. It is said to be proclaimed on the 15th October 2021 in Australia, the United States of America, Canada and probably the United Kingdom, and Martial Law implemented until new elections can be held, with all present seat holders excluded. All the States will be bankrupted, including the Commonwealth, and the legal system restored to 1870 when it was sabotaged by lawyers, who were after 498 years admitted to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It will restore the common law in place until 1873 when the Judicature Act 1873 (imp) was enacted stripping the clergy of judicial power, by the lawyers newly elected to the House of Commons. It is said that the Act of 1871 has been nullified, and so too must the Act of 1873 merging Church and State, in a lawyer Judge.
* John Grey is a Melbourne legal activist
Letter to the Editor
I worked as a SLSO ( School Learning Support Officer) fancy name for a teachers aid for the last 15 years.
I worked at 3 various schools. Birchgrove, Rozelle and south Coogee Public School.
I worked with special needs children and I absolutely loved my job. I was very good at my job and was very much appreciated and popular by students, their parents, teachers, office staff and so on. My contract was terminated in a second on 27/7/2021 due to COVID rules.
I am struggling with mental health as I’ve had my gorgeous children ripped out of my hands, I’ve lost my job and livelihood, I’ve lost my colleagues as they’ve all been gagged. I’ve lost my trust in people and am hurting beyond words. I am a good person and love helping and supporting the less fortunate and what the department of education has done to me and many like me is NOT OK.
I’m sad all the time where I was such a happy person. Full of energy and positive always. They have destroyed me and my family. My children are so worried for me. I’m 61 years old and how and where do I go for employment? I’m on jobseeker which only pays $630 a fortnight. I am devastated beyond words.
Your honour please find it in your heart to help us. What is going on in Australia and the Australian people is heart breaking. We are a good,honest and hard working nation. Please help us. We need not only your wisdom but most importantly we need the kindness, the understanding and support from your heart.
Arobella Jebraiel NSW
Editor: Hazzard once was a school teacher!
from The Australian
A NSW Supreme Court judge has taken the extraordinary step of warning the public not to contact him as he gets set to hear a test case over NSW’s public health orders later this week.
Justice Robert Beech-Jones will oversee a three-day trial in which Health Minister Brad Hazzard will defend the state government’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Two plaintiffs, Al-Munir Kassam and Natasha Henry, have filed civil suits challenging various aspects of the public health orders instituted in response to the latest outbreak fuelled by the Delta variant.
Starting this Thursday, Justice Beech-Jones will hear the challenge to the rules which state that essential workers must receive their first vaccination by September 19 if they are to leave an LGA of concern for work purposes.
The lawsuit is challenging rules which prevent unvaccinated workers from leaving their LGAs for their jobs. Picture: NCA NewsWire/Jeremy Piper.
And Justice Beech-Jones took the unorthodox step of warning those watching online not to contact him unless they were lawyers for the two parties.
He said that the deluge of emails and phone calls to his chambers had been so great, that those with legitimate business with the court were having trouble getting through.
He emphasised that he would not take any correspondence into consideration.
“Over the last few days, my office has been inundated with emails and telephone calls from people who are interested in the proceedings but are not lawyers or parties,” Justice Beech-Jones said.
“Please understand I will not read any of your emails or take any of your calls.
“People who do so risk interfering with the administration of justice. And anyone who encourages any of this to happen is equally encouraging the interference with the administration of justice.”
The matter will be subject to a three-day hearing starting Thursday, with Justice Beech-Jones on Tuesday morning ruling that evidence in one matter will be evidence in the other.
Ms Henry’s lawyers opposed the move, arguing that it would cause her legal costs to blow out.
The court heard that her matter was only expected to take up one day of the hearing and she would only be calling two expert witnesses, as opposed to Mr Kassan who is calling eight.
However Justice Beech-Jones said given the overlap in the two cases and their contentions, “the prospect of differential evidence in both cases leading to a differential outcome” was unsatisfactory.
Premier Gladys Berejiklian on Monday announced that on December 1, unvaccinated persons would have restrictions lifted as part of a staged repealing of lockdown measures.
Barrister Jeremy Kirk, acting for Mr Hazzard, said he did not know if this would include the easing of restrictions which are being challenged in the suit.
Editor: It now seems, in light of the overwhelming medical evidence we have seen that the so-called Delta variant is actually the result of mRNA vaccines.
Letter to the Editor
Sorry to make this so urgent but we need to do all we can to support those who are fighting for our cause 🙂
It has been Urgently requested that we all sign up to watch today’s AFL Solicitors Supreme Court case, so they can witness the public’s interest in the matter, The more people logged on listening & watching the better.
💣 DAVID VS GOLIATH ROUND 1 💣 Turning Point Australia
🚨 Right now!! we need EVERYBODY, to send an email now to the following address:
🚨 In the Email Ask for a login to listen in to today’s case with AFL Solicitors 🔥☢️
• ASK for a LOG IN detail for the following & Include the Case number: 2021/249601
You have to do it now! They NEED to see as many people logged in to watch & listen as possible!!!
Nancy Hargrave To Jesus, through Mary
Editor: The Directions Hearing would indicate this case could run for a few weeks.
New evidence, including a sworn affidavit from Prof. Luc A. Montagnier, has been submitted to the International Criminal Court alleging World Governments are complicit in genocide and crimes against humanity
New evidence, including sworn affidavits from leading experts such as Professor Luc A. Montagnier, has been submitted to the International Criminal Court by lawyers in several countries alleging Government’s across the world and their advisors are complicit in genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code.
Attorney Melinda C. Mayne, and Kaira S. McCallum submitted a 27-page ‘Request for Investigation’ to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague back in April 2021 alleging the UK Government and its advisors were complicit in crimes against humanity in the name of Covid-19.
On the 28th of April 2021, the pair received a formal acknowledgement from the ICC and were assigned a case number – ‘141/21’. Since then the pair have been gathering new evidence to use in their ICC claim and have established connections with lawyers and research scientists from around the world.
A new press release released on the 17th August, which can be viewed here, confirms that the pair have received sworn affidavits from leading experts including research scientist and nuclear cardiologist Dr Richard M. Fleming, the Nobel Laureate virologist Professor Luc A. Montagnier, and Dr Kevin W. McCairn, a neuroscientist and expert on neurological disease.
Professor Luc A Montagnier, who won a Nobel prize for his work on the HIV virus, claimed in April 2020 that he believed the novel coronavirus was created in a laboratory. Then in May 2021 the expert virologist stated that “Mass vaccinations are a scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants”.
A new claim has also been submitted to the ICC due to the vast amount of new evidence and information that has come to light in the past few months, and the lawyers say they now have compelling evidence that “the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ are deliberately engineered bioweapons that have been released in two phashes on unsuspecting peoples of the world”.
Attorney Melinda C. Mayne, and Kaira S. McCallum have also confirmed that they have now be joined by lawyers who have filed similar Requests for Investigation to the International Criminal Court, in France, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Because of this a letter was sent to the ICC on the 12th August 2021 requesting they all be allowed to submit a joint claim, whilst also submitting preliminary evidence for the allegations common to everyone across the world, and requesting the right to have claims specific to individual countries also investigated by the ICC.
One request specific to the United Kingdom is an examination of genocide of the elderly and vulnerable that took place in care homes and hospitals through the inappropriate use of midazolam and morphine. Another investigation specific to this issue has also now concluded and a private criminal prosecution will proceed against the UK Government, Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty and others if the team of lawyers and experts who have carried out the investigation do not receive satisfactory answers to the extensive questions that have been forwarded to the aforementioned in an open letter sent on the 17th August 2021.
Whilst in the joint claim between lawyers from several countries they have requested that there be an immediate suspension on the entire Covid-19 injection programme and an end to the testing of asymptomatic people.
The lawyers say that they now eagerly await the decision of the International Criminal Court as to whether they will allow a joint claim by several countries to be made and accept the Request for Investigation.
They have made it clear to the ICC that due to the escalating medical apartheid, the loss of basic freedoms and rights, and the ever-increasing, very high number of deaths and serious adverse events suffered by recipients of Covid-19 injections, that there is an urgent need for the Court to act swiftly and without further delay.
To that end the lawyers have requested a meeting at the Hague as soon as is practicable.
Whilst awaiting the response Attorney Melinda C. Mayne, and Kaira S. McCallum have confirmed they are in discussions with lawyers in other countries who have not yet filed their individual Requests to the ICC, but have indicated they wish to join them, and will issue an update as and when there is further news.
Victoria Legal Services Board
April 20, 2021
Dear Mrs Bennett
We have been following the legal challenges mounted by Advocate Me in Victoria courts. In particular the court challenge to the entire Covid 19 strategy of the Victoria Labor Government. We would also direct these questions to Premier Dan Andrews but we understand he is convalescing after a serious assault at Portsea.
1. Has your Board cancelled the solicitor’s practicing licence of Serene Teffaha?
2. On what grounds was it cancelled? At what precise time was Serene Teffaha notified of this cancellation?
3. Is your Board or its representative taking over Advocate Me client files?
4. Are these files in your possession?
5. Has your representative or the Board taken monies from the Advocate Me Trust Account or any other account?
6. For what purpose?
7. Has your Board or its representative requested all the client details of those participating in the class action against the government for its Covid responses?
8. Has the Board requested any other details of any other of Advocate Me clients?
9. What does the Board intend doing with the client details?
10. Has your Board or any of its representatives made any threats, verbal or otherwise against Serene Teffaha?
11. By what authority has the Board acted against Serene Teffaha?
12. Was there any request or pressure placed on yourself, other board members or representatives of your Board by the Attorney General, the Bar Association, the Law Society or politicians to take action against Serene Teffaha?
13. Has your Board ever received any complaints from an Advocate Me client in relation to a class action or any other matter involving Serene Teffaha?
14. Has your Board charged Serene Teffaha with any offence?
15. Is your Board now investigating any replacement lawyer who may have taken over Serene Teffaha’s files?
Your early advice would be appreciated. Cairns News is one of the largest independent news sites in Australia.
Robert J Lee
State sanctioned violence and intimidation must stop. The clients of Advocate Me solicitor Serene Teffaha are being targeted for the sole purpose of sabotaging the National Class Action and taking over the Melbourne Detention Tower Class Action.
In an astounding illegal move, the VLSB has demanded the identity of the 5000 litigants involved in the class action.
The Victorian Legal Services Board cancelled her solicitor’s practicing licence trying to stop the class action which would allow witnesses under oath in court, to reveal the genocidal activities of the communist Victorian Government.
Joining this team of ravaging wolves is the Commonwealth Bank which removed Serene’s access to her trust account then allowing a dodgy accountancy firm to access class action funds, crippling her proceeding.
A US reader wrote:
Just wanted to ask, we know what’s happening all around the world with this plandemic, the vaccine, the new world order, etc. There are a lot of Americans making a stand, we listen to Robert David Steele & Dr Charlie Ward he has 11.1 million followers.
What we want to know is, why isn’t anything happening in Australia it needs to stop, they will kill millions.
What can we do? No one even talks about it in Australia they just watch the news & do what they are told.
How do we wake every one up?
Thanking you Cherie
Time for Qld objectors to file in the Federal Court against Ministerial and doctor’s Covid decrees while we have a few businesses left
Support Victorian solicitor Serene Taffaha in her battle against the corrupt legal system
Brussels courts rule against all coronavirus measures
From the Brussels Times
The Belgian State has been ordered to lift “all coronavirus measures” within 30 days, as the legal basis for them is insufficient, a Brussels court ruled on Wednesday.
The League for Human Rights had filed the lawsuit several weeks ago and challenged Belgium’s system of implementing the measures using Ministerial Decrees, which means it is done without any input from parliament.
The judge gave the Belgian State 30 days to provide a sound legal basis, or face a penalty of €5,000 per day that this period is exceeded, with a maximum limit of €200,000, reports Le Soir.
The current coronavirus measures are based on the Civil Safety Act of 2007, which enable the State to react quickly in “exceptional circumstances,” but the judge has now ruled that these laws cannot serve as a basis for the Ministerial Decrees.
“The judge ruled that the principle of legality has been violated because the current way of working is not foreseeable enough,” Kati Verstrepen of the Human Rights League confirmed to VRT, adding the consequences are “not so dramatic” that from one day to the next, the measures would no longer be valid.
For the time being, the current coronavirus measures will not change, and the verdict is currently being studied by the office of Interior Minister Annelies Verlinden, reports De Standaard.
Appealing against the court ruling is still possible, but as it concerns a summary judgment, an appeal would not suspend the execution of the judgment.
On Wednesday afternoon, the Chamber will debate Belgium’s upcoming pandemic law, which is supposed to provide “a permanent legal basis, for taking this kind of restrictive measures during a pandemic.”
Several legal experts already pressed the Belgian State to bring forward the law as soon as possible to avoid judges cancelling fines written out for violations of the measures, and this ruling only increases the pressure to quickly adopt it.
Maïthé Chini & Lauren Walker
The Brussels Times
Covid crusader Serene Teffaha is seeking whistleblower protection from the Federal Government and Victorian Ombudsman from interference by State Government regulators threatening to shut her down and steal funds from her trust account to cover costs after she filed in the Supreme Court on March 19, a substantial class action against the Victorian government seeking damages for Covid lockdowns, forced testing, forced vaccination, forced detention, forced masking and forced restrictive behaviors.
One of several class actions has 5000 participants challenging the responses to the pandemic and she is on the verge of filing a national class action attested by the knee jerk reaction from Deep State politicians who want to shut her down with government interference bordering on criminal behavior.
Cairns News has thrown its support behind this gutsy solicitor who in 2012 took on the ‘old boys club’ of the Australian Taxation Department when she blew the whistle on corruption within its higher ranks.
Her firm Advocate Me provides a commendable community service often acting on a pro bono basis and it is of note she is acting for two gutsy NSW police officers who blew the whistle on highly questionable Covid responses and suppression of readily available and cheap remedies by the NSW Government last year.
She said she has another class action ready to file against the Family Court due to the way in which it deals with family violence and is specifically targeting the corruption and maladministration by Family Court judges who have brutalised thousands and thousands of people.
We applaud her gutsy, long overdue actions which would be sending shivers up the spines of her colleagues in the legal profession and courts Australia wide. Is it any wonder the corrupt court registries wielding unlawful power in concert with judges and their wink and nod outcomes would be terrified of her offensive. Hopefully she can find enough honest judges and demand a jury as insurance.
from Serene Teffaha, Solicitor and Covid 19 plandemic adversary
Advocate Me has been working hard at providing a platform to bring together other lawyers, activists, medical experts, police and professionals, to promulgate various legal campaigns exploring the devastating impacts that forced lockdowns, forced detention, forced testing, forced masking, forced business and service closures, forced denial of access to loved ones and forced vaccinations have brought to our nation.
Our website details all the legal campaigns we have been working tirelessly on. Many of these campaigns are reaching the pointy end of being lodged in Court. We will be filing the Detention Towers class action on the 2nd of Feb, when the court resumes, in which we are representing some of the most disenfranchised and vulnerable members of our community. This will soon be followed by the National Class Action, in which we are challenging most of the issues listed above.
We are also representing whistle-blowers who have come forward to expose corruption and maladministration in our courts, policing and medical establishments. Specifically, we are now helping two police officers who have blown the whistle and formed the Cops for Covid Truth campaign. Many whistle-blowers are confronted by the sheer vengeance of the system and are often pressed financially, so we are representing them on a pro bono basis.
Furthermore, the fast-tracked approvals of the covid-19 vaccines without adequate long-term safety studies is an issue that has quickly presented itself over the past two months, and we have brain-stormed the best methods to challenge the roll out of these vaccines, and the threats these will either be mandated or coerced on the public.
Through our networks, we have established a strong connection with qualified individuals who are happy to take the lead as directors of People for Safe Vaccines Ltd, a company limited by guarantee, one of its purposes being to challenge the data and representations made by our government and the vaccine companies themselves, in relation to their safety and efficacy claims.
If this issue is as important to you as it is to so many of our clients, please express your interest in becoming a member, to support this vital campaign. The company is a great vehicle for ensuring that your voices can be heard without exposing you to any liability, which is only limited to your contribution as a member. www.peopleforsafevaccines.org
We are very pleased with the website we have launched, and we ask that you become a member and circulate to your friends, family, and colleagues to do the same. Once you become a member, you will be regularly informed of everything we do when launching any legal challenge against the government, in their attempts to potentially force unsafe and ineffective vaccines on the public.
As you can imagine, we are trying to respond as quickly as possible to these issues, realising that many people are reluctant to be at the forefront of any challenge. We do not want to wait until the damage is done. This is our opportunity to get organised quickly, and be strategic in the way we respond.
We have already started taking the legal steps necessary to question the processes used to fast-track these experimental vaccines. All this information is available on the website for you to consider and read.
Serene Teffaha, as the principal for Advocate Me, is the CEO for People for Safe Vaccines; and our legal associate and colleague, Ben Clemens from Clemens Haskin Legal, is the solicitor.
Your membership will also allow you access to a specific People for Safe Vaccines forum to discuss the experimental covid-19 vaccines and all associated issues.We have also launched a separate forum for the Advocate Me website that will give you free access, where you can communicate with other community members on a myriad of issues relating to the lockdowns and mandatory flu vaccinations.
Advocate Me is representing our whistle-blower clients on a pro bono basis, and the Detention Towers clients, on a no-win, no-fee basis. Clemens Haskin Legal is handling People for Safe Vaccines on a no-win, no-fee basis. We have created a series of letter templates to empower you to deal with several key issues around masking and vaccination, where businesses and employers are acting unlawfully. These can be downloaded free from our forum.
Our preference is that you join and become a member of People for Safe Vaccines or our National Class Action, however we appreciate that some of you would prefer to make a donation to support us to manage all these vital campaigns.
If you would like to donate, please go to www.advocateme.com.au/donate and nominate how much you would like to contribute, and what campaigns you are supporting. Complete the form so we can provide you with updates and details as the money is spent, to ensure transparency.
Funds raised support us to manage all these vital campaigns, and vulnerable people, and continue to provide free templates and a free community forum, as we transition away from traditional social media platforms that are rife with censorship and trolls.
Thank you for your ongoing support.
Serene Teffaha and the team
Barrister calls out Andrews: The lockdown is a bluff and illegal
The barrister then pointed to page 106 of The Public Health and Wellbeing Act Division 1 Section 111 which states the spread of an infectious disease should be prevented or minimised with “the minimum restrictions on the rights of any person”.
“The clause doesn’t say ‘the restrictions on the rights of any person will be minimum to contain the spread of an infectious disease’. If the clause’s construction read this way, it would attempt to give the chief health officer arbitrary power to decide what’s minimum to get his job done as he sees fit, and with no consideration or reference to what the person, whose rights being restricted, thinks. This is not how the law works or what the clause says.
“The legal drafting and clause construction is very clear. It says the chief health officer can do his job to stop the spread of an infectious disease, but a person’s rights restrictions must be minimal. He has a qualifier and restraint. He doesn’t decide what’s minimum. So who does decide what’s minimum?
“If a person, whose rights are being restricted, has no say in the matter, there would have been no need to include the clause in the legislation. The Parliament sought to preserve and protect civil liberties. It’s a check on unfettered powers. That is the purpose of the clause, otherwise, why have it in the legislation if the chief health officer has unrestrained powers? It’s a reminder and constraint on the chief health officer.”
The barrister’s message notes that the Westminster system constrains, separates, checks and contains power, through a mechanism known as the Separation of Powers, which means that the legislature (that makes laws), the Executive (Premier and Ministry) who execute law, and the Judiciary who interpret laws, remain separate. “This is a check on power so it’s not concentrated as we seem to have in Victoria at the present.”
“The default ‘Mentis’ (mind) of Parliament, in a liberal democracy, is to preserve freedoms, particularly the freedom of movement and association which the High Court has protected over and over and now Daniel Andrews thinks he can extinguish.
“The person who decides what’s a minimum restraint on a person’s rights is the person who has the rights. If that person has no say on what’s a restraint, the person would be deemed to have no rights, so why mention them? In this event, the person at best, has privileges which can be limited or extinguished. Like a driving licence.
“True rights can only be suspended or limited by the right’s holder. These are known as inalienable rights – God-given which cannot be extinguished by the state, the chief health officer or Daniel Andrews.
“Division 1 Section 111 was drafted in acknowledgement of this liberal democratic principle. The Section is even referred to as the Principle of the Act, against which all Directions Orders must be measured. Case closed,” the barrister notes.
“What I have just set out is a legal argument by a barrister might make before a magistrate, who is usually ill equipped to handle such arguments. Now you understand why the last thing Daniel Andrews wants is fines to be challenged in court. Push the problem into the future. Maybe, even forgive fines so they never see a courtroom. The podium have zero standing and will never stand up in court when the BS fines are challenged. They’re all a big bluff. The lockdown is a bluff.
“It’s no wonder the Magistrates Court has adjourned all Covid challenged fines well into 2021.
If one illegal fine gets before a court, Andrews will buckle like he did with the Curfew when it was uncovered as a fraud. The Directions Order will be found to be as illegal as the Curfew. The day before the Curfew was challenged in the Supreme Court, it was quickly ended by Andrews.”
The barrister says the 5km restraint is equally illegal as an excessive restraint on the rights of Victorians. “I remind you. If Victorians have no rights, as Andrews asserts, then why mention them in the Act?
“While Andrews can’t be removed as Premier, he is subject to the Westminster system Separation of Powers, which means the Parliament or courts can clip his wings and stop his tyranny. As he has the numbers and Parliament and it’s not sitting, it’s useless to try a no confidence motion against Andrews, so we’re left with the judiciary and the courts. Spread this across social media.”
“Being awake and informed will set you free,” says the barrister. “With the legal illusion of fines swept away, so is lockdown. We decide when the lockdown ends, not Daniel Andrews. The police will run out of ink in their pens writing fines if we don’t cooperate.
“It was for this reason Daniel Andrews wanted detention powers in his Omnibus Bill. He feared someone would write a post like this and wake up Victoria. Repost this as far and wide as you can.
“Victorians don’t know or understand the law and Andrews feels omnipotent whilst Victorians are oblivious and kept in the dark. The average police member in the street is even less well equipped to handle these matter, so don’t try to enlighten them or argue whilst being issued with an illegal and worthless fine.
“They have no idea. They’re just following orders. In any event, fines are only allegations and not findings of fact or guilt. Fines become an admission of guilt when you pay them.”
By Tony Mobilifonitis
KIWIS face the most crucial election in their history on October 17, with both major parties – Labor and the “opposition” Nationals – now united on running with the medical dictatorship model driven by the Gates-Rockefeller-World Economic Forum “global health” cabal.
Despite the New Zealand High Court’s bizarre recent ruling that the first nine days of Ardern’s lockdown was “unlawful but justified”, the National Party leader Judith Collins has joined with Ardern in using “the virus” to impose a medical tyranny.
Collins wants to make it compulsory for everyone entering the country and border workers to carry contact tracing technology, which is the thin edge of the wedge for the vaccination certificates floated by her fellow fake conservative across the Tasman, Scott Morrison.
There is little or nothing separating the COVID policies of the major parties on either side of the ditch, prompting another desperate attempt by NZ Public Party leader Billy Te Kahika to rally the collection of minor parties into some sort of united front that can mount an effective challenge at the election.
Under New Zealand’s mixed-member proportional (MMP) electoral system, introduced in 1996, smaller parties have a better chance of gaining seats, especially in alliances.
“I will approach minor parties again because we need to work together to defend democracy and protect our economy. We are dealing with a very hostile government,” he said on a recent YouTube broadcast. He says 87% of all businesses in Auckland are on some sort of government subsidy, which makes a joke of Ardern’s Labor Party election slogan “Let’s Keep Moving”.
“We’ve got people just creating fear and panic to create systems of control like we’ve never seen. We have less than 40 cases in New Zealand but we’ve got roadblocks, checkpoints and normalization of mask wearing.”
NZPP has formed an alliance with ex-Nationals MP Jami-Lee Ross, whose Advance New Zealand Party has also merged with several other smaller parties. An alliance of small parties in 1996 won 10 per cent of the total vote, gaining 13 MPs. Australian minor parties have to rely on preference distributions which can, in rare circumstances, put a larger minor party like One Nation into a seat.
One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson, by the way, has taken a strong stand against Morrison’s vaccine push, declaring in a new video she will not have any COVID vaccine shot. She already does not take flu shots. This should be a major issue in the upcoming Queensland state election on October 31.
Morrison’s proposed deal with the pharma giant Astra Zeneca to push the so-called Oxford Vaccine is nothing more than a neo-Nazi eugenics system which makes unvaccinated people a restricted class of outcasts, banned from restaurants, jobs, government entitlements, education and travel.
The policy recalls Hitler’s Germany in 1935-36, when Jews were denied the vote and banned from all professional jobs, effectively preventing them from exerting any influence in education, politics, higher education and industry.
Meanwhile Ardern, the neo-fascist witch of the south, has upped the ante in pushing her medical tyranny even further, with new “rules” forcing people testing positive to COVID-19 (or is it just coronavirus i.e. colds and flu?) to quarantine in “government facilities” for two weeks. Those who refuse tests get four weeks incarceration for exercising their right at common law to informed consent to medical treatment.
Te Kahika says he heard from desperate families inside the detention centres where there’s no-one to talk to from health department. He’s alarmed that health authorities will detain family members and separate them from children.
In one incident late in July members of a young family absconded from a quarantine facility to go to the tangi (funeral) of the father. They had tested negative but been refused an exemption to go to Auckland from the facility in Hamilton.
The High Court case last week was initiated by Wellington lawyer Andrew Borrowdale, who challenged the legality of the early stages of the lockdown, including calls by Ardern and others between March 26 and April 3 for New Zealanders to stay home.
In a bizarre ruling, the court found that while there was “no question that the requirement was a necessary, reasonable and proportionate response to the COVID-19 crisis at the time”, it was not prescribed by law and was therefore contrary to section 5 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act.