Category Archives: AMA

Some of us wondered why doctors stopped being doctors and instead became meek unthinking servants who forgot all about informed consent for Covid jabs

Letter to the Editor

“Three Long and Wearisome Covid Years”: To All You Latecomers to the Party of Truth: Two Words”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/three-long-and-wearisome-covid-years-to-all-you-latecomers-to-the-party-of-truth-two-words/5807281

It’s been approximately three years, three long and wearisome years, since the madness descended upon us.

Some of us thought that the story about a wet-market bat in Wuhan was an obviously deliberate deception.

Some of us thought that the globally-synchronized rush to shut down the world and pursue a single solution – the so-called vaccine – was an omen.

The discontinued PCR test which was taken off the market in November 2021 by manufacturer CDC in the US because it was totally inaccurate and could find a sore toe in a garden gnome.

Some of us thought that our medical institutions, by pushing lockdowns for the healthy, masks for everybody, school closures and remote learning and work, among other things, all the while neglecting early treatment and prevention, had betrayed us and themselves profoundly and inexplicably.

Some of us hesitated to believe that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for COVID was legitimate.

Some of us, looking around carefully to notice a dearth of dead bodies regularly scooped up off the streets, doubted that we were truly in the midst of a devastating pandemic.

Some of us chose to heed the therapeutic advice of Drs. Vladimir Zelenko, Pierre Kory and Peter McCullough, the epidemiological findings of Dr. John Ioannidis, and the grave warnings about the mRNA inoculation by Drs. Sucharit Bhakdi and Mike Yeadon, and many others.

Some of us simply listened to our own autonomous good sense and reasoned that there was no cause to be hysterically alarmed and no need to receive a newly-introduced injection for which long-term studies were absent.

Some of us were mystified by the increasingly vehement language used to subject us to political and medical dictates.

Some of us wondered why doctors stopped being doctors and instead became meek unthinking servants who forgot all about informed consent, individualized treatment and the principle of not doing harm.

Some of us predicted that the generation of spike proteins and the introduction of messenger RNA into our cells might result in a plethora of devastating consequences for health, consequences that could not be described in their entirety but which could include vascular compromise, strokes, inflammatory autoimmune reactions and a weakening of our immune system’s ability to function properly and robustly.

Some of us were disgusted by the attempt to scapegoat those who refused to be inoculated by an unnecessary and potentially dangerous agent, and to exclude us from the fabric of society.

Some of us bristled at the attempts to deny us the right to congregate, worship, protest and, in countries like New Zealand, even to take a swim.

Some of us didn’t accept that young children having strokes or dropping dead, or super-fit athletes dying on the pitch, or regular folks perishing far sooner than expected was normal.

Some of us gave up our jobs and lost many friendships for making a decision to think for ourselves and reject ill-conceived coercions.

Some of us also saw that the Corona War was the first big battle in a mission to digitize, control and enslave much of the now-depopulating population.

Some of us called a spade a spade and murder, by any other name – such as ‘excess mortality’ – murder. .

Others, now three years down the line, as a mountain of evidence that can no longer be concealed, even by MSM propaganda, accumulates about the serious risks of the jabs, aside from their inefficacy, are beginning to give public mea culpas for their initial and often rabid promotion of the global governmental/media position.

Some of these others have dared to ask how those of us could have been so right so early on:

‘What was our secret?’

They have had the chutzpah to criticize us for not having warned them emphatically enough in the midst of the fear-frenzy:

‘Why hadn’t we pulled them up by the lapels and shaken some sense into them? Why were we so selfish with our knowledge, and so timid in our campaign?’

To all these others, late-comers to the party of truth, standing at the gates on Judgment Day, I have two words, which I will not say.

Instead, I ask:

“Why were you such cowards? Where was your common sense?”

Emanuel E. Garcia, M.D.

From David2

Queensland

Qld Labor ‘inhumane’ for removing Covid remedy hydroxychloroquine from market and jailing anyone who uses it

Senator Malcolm Roberts questions, is Australia the New World Order’s testing ground? He discusses this and more with Maria Zeee on the Alex Jones Show.

Download video – https://rumble.com/v28glmi-wake-up-world-senator-malcolm-roberts-exposes-death-squad-duopoly-governmen.html?mref=qnz9d&mc=6f8oi

Covid jabs cause 5162 per cent increase in Australian deaths

By Lyndesy Symonds

And while genocidal psychopath , Bill , is over here to take a dump on Australia, he just happens to let it drop that CoVID vaxxes don’t work.

This must be some kind of ‘in joke’ after the Australian Bureau of Stats has crunched the numbers and come up with 5162% increase in excess deaths across all causes of mortality in Australia from 2021 – 2023. They gave this info secretly to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. So now it is public domain.

All the CoVID Commissars get it. Bill, a slime-y little sucker pad on the Vampyre Squid and little Albo who has to run UN CoVID Operation here in the Australian patch. They all get it. And since we all know it is NOT, Absolutely NOT the vaccine that could possibly be causing 5162% cause of excess mortality, Bill just can’t restrain his squidliness: – ‘well the covid vaxxes don’t work anyway’ he assures the Australian families who have loved ones due to the vaxx adversities and the Australians who have lost their homes, their jobs, businesses and health due to the Australian CoVID Regime mandates.

What we are supposed to believe from Bill’s infobyte is that the CoVID Vaxx ‘doesn’t work’ against the ‘SARS nouvelle corona cov-2 virus’ of the Global Pandemic 2020, a virus that was never isolated from any human tissue and shown to be infectious and transmissible. That Virus. That Pandemic.

But the CoVID Vaxx as a bioweapon for depopulation, well it is working just fine. The numbers are now in at a pleasing 5162%. And Bill is on public record as a depopulator for the Vampyre Squid. So he would know.

Liberal, Labor duopoly ensuring oldies get their fourth shot before they die from the third

By Jim O’Toole, Townsville Bureau

The stupidity of the Liberal National Party knows no bounds when it comes to the Covid scam and their combined ignorance of advice by highly qualified medical specialists speaking out against mRNA gene therapy leaves voters in no doubt why the city-centric party lost office.

The Liberal Party machine posthumously conducted an expensive internal examination of why they lost this year’s election yet if they had asked Joe Blow on the street he would have told them for nothing that deposed PM Scott Morrison and Health Minister Greg Hunt did the job for them with the Covid mandates, lockdowns, job losses and vaxx victims.

Both are straight out of the World Economic Forum camp and had CEO Klaus Schwab’s world domination plans scrawled all over them during their term in office.

While medicos denounce the Covid scam in a creeping crescendo the dumber than dumb Labor, Liberals and Nationals are unable to fathom why 102 already vaccinated aged care residents in the week before Christmas died of ‘Çovid’ infections.

As the inventor of mRNA technology Dr Robert Malone has stated many times for all to discover, Covid deaths are being caused by mRNA shots. One, two or three doses of the deadly Pfizer toxin which the company was forced to admit, has an efficacy of about 2 per cent.

There is no Covid virus. It has never been isolated in human tissue anywhere in the world and the PCR test was denounced as a fraud by its inventor biochemist the late Kary Mullis and manufacturer CDC and taken off the market in November.

Then along comes the unintelligent Coalition spokeswoman for Aged Care, Anne Ruston, who wants to give the poor oldies a fourth dose of deadly vaxx to kill them even more quickly it seems.

The political charlatans of the Liberal and Labor duopoly along with Klaus Schwab should be incarcerated as soon as possible before they do any more damage to the population, albeit much is already done.

Medical experts have warned the deaths are just beginning while the mRNA shots in the next five years, combined with remedy Remdesivir as Pfizer and Moderna should know, would wipe out or seriously maim at least a predicted 90 per cent of vaxx victims.

Meanwhile Labor’s Aged Care Minister and intellectual pygmy, Anika Wells, not content with the burgeoning annual death rate which has more than doubled in Australia, said fourth doses were being prioritized for Australians over 50.

Here we have the ALP political party corporation which elicited only 32 per cent of the national vote, calling the shots under the unlawful and preposterous ‘two party preferred electoral system.’

Have they never heard of former AMA President Doctor Kerryn Phelps who very publicly, dropped the axe on the entire Covid scam last week when she revealed hers and her partner’s serious vaxx injuries?

Heart attacks, strokes, myocarditis and blocked arteries have been identified in thousands of autopsies world wide and almost every smart mortician has warned the world the mRNA vaxx is the killer.

Any person who votes again in Australia deserves all they get.

Former AMA head Dr Kerryn Phelps lifts veil of silence over Covid vaxx adverse reactions and threats from regulators

by Frank Chung, senior reporter News.com.au

In an explosive submission to Parliament’s Long Covid inquiry, the former Australian Medical Association (AMA) president and politician Dr Kerryn Phelps has broken her silence about the “devastating” experience — emerging as the most prominent public health figure in the country to speak up about the taboo subject.

She suggested the true rate of adverse events is far higher than acknowledged due to under-reporting and “threats” from medical regulators.

“This is an issue that I have witnessed first-hand with my wife who suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes, including burning face and gums, paraesethesiae, and numb hands and feet, while under observation by myself, another doctor and a registered nurse at the time of immunisation,” the 65-year-old said.

“I continue to observe the devastating effects a year-and-a-half later with the addition of fatigue and additional neurological symptoms including nerve pains, altered sense of smell, visual disturbance and musculoskeletal inflammation. The diagnosis and causation has been confirmed by several specialists who have told me that they have seen ‘a lot’ of patients in a similar situation.”

Former Australian Medical Assn head Dr Kerryn Phelps has revealed she and her partner Jackie Stricker-Phelps have been damaged by mRNA vaxx. Complaints to the TGA were ignored.

Dr Phelps married former primary school teacher Jackie Stricker-Phelps in 1998.

“Jackie asked me to include her story to raise awareness for others,” she said.

“We did a lot of homework before having the vaccine, particularly about choice of vaccine at the time. In asking about adverse side effects, we were told that ‘the worst thing that could happen would be anaphylaxis’ and that severe reactions such as myocarditis and pericarditis were ‘rare’.”

Dr Phelps revealed she was also diagnosed with a vaccine injury from her second dose of Pfizer in July 2021, “with the diagnosis and causation confirmed by specialist colleagues”.

“I have had CT pulmonary angiogram, ECG, blood tests, cardiac echogram, transthoracic cardiac stress echo, Holter monitor, blood pressure monitoring and autonomic testing,” she said.

“In my case the injury resulted in dysautonomia with intermittent fevers and cardiovascular implications including breathlessness, inappropriate sinus tachycardia and blood pressure fluctuations.”

Dr Phelps said both reactions were reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) “but never followed up”.

She revealed she had spoken with other doctors “who have themselves experienced a serious and persistent adverse event” but that “vaccine injury is a subject that few in the medical profession have wanted to talk about”.

“Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunisation, with threats to doctors not to make any public statements about anything that ‘might undermine the government’s vaccine rollout’ or risk suspension or loss of their registration,” she said.

The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA), which oversees Australia’s 800,000 registered practitioners and 193,800 students, last year warned that anyone who sought to “undermine” the national Covid vaccine rollout could face deregistration or even prosecution.

AHPRA’s position statement said that “any promotion of anti-vaccination statements or health advice which contradicts the best available scientific evidence or seeks to actively undermine the national immunisation campaign (including via social media) is not supported by National Boards and may be in breach of the codes of conduct and subject to investigation and possible regulatory action”.

Earlier this year, Australian musician Tyson ‘tyDi’ Illingworth said he had been told privately by doctors that they feared being deregistered if they linked his neurological injury to the Moderna vaccine.

Dr Phelps said she had heard stories of vaccine injury from “patients and other members of the community”.

What does the dodgy boss of the TGA, Professor John Skerritt say now about vaccine conspiracy stories?

“They have had to search for answers, find GPs and specialists who are interested and able to help them, spend large amounts of money on medical investigations, isolate from friends and family, reduce work hours, lose work if they are required to attend in person and avoid social and cultural events,” she said.

“Within this group of vaccine injured individuals, there is a diminishing cohort of people who have symptoms following immunisation, many of which are similar to Long Covid (such as fatigue and brain fog), but who have not had a Covid infection. These people would be an important subset or control group for studies looking into the pathophysiology, causes of and treatments for Long Covid. It is possible that there is at least some shared pathophysiology between vaccine injury and Long Covid, possibly due to the effects of spike protein.”

She added that “in trying to convince people in positions of influence to pay attention to the risks of Long Covid and reinfection for people with vaccine injury, I have personally been met with obstruction and resistance to openly discuss this issue”.

“There has been a delay in recognition of vaccine injury, partly because of under-reporting, concerns about vaccine hesitancy in the context of managing a global pandemic, and needing to find the balance between risks and benefits on a population level,” she said.

“Reactions were said to be ‘rare’ without data to confirm how common or otherwise these reactions were. In general practice I was seeing cases, which meant other GPs and specialists were seeing cases too. Without diagnostic tests, we have to rely largely on clinical history.”

In July this year, the independent OzSAGE group of which Dr Phelps is a member issued a position statement calling for better systems and management of Covid vaccine adverse events and “recognition of the impact of vaccine injury”.

Dr Phelps, who was heavily involved in crafting the statement, wrote in her submission that the OzSAGE document “outlines the scope but not the scale of the problem because we do not know the scale of the problem”.

“This is partly because of under-reporting and under-recognition,” she said.

According to the TGA’s most recent safety update, there have been a total of 137,141 adverse event reports from nearly 64.4 million doses — a rate of 0.2 per cent.

There have been 819 reports “assessed as likely to be myocarditis” from 49.8 million doses of Pfizer and Moderna. Fourteen deaths have officially been linked to vaccination — 13 after AstraZeneca and one after Pfizer.

Cairns News: This data from the TGA is at odds with VAERS data from the US where there have been many thousands of reported deaths.

From the VAERS website: “From December 14, 2020, through December 7, 2022, VAERS (US) received 17,868 preliminary reports of death (0.0027%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.”

The long term adverse affects are now beginning to emerge in Australia as emergency wards fill with those who have been injured by the mRNA vaxx. Many of these hospital admissions for vaccine damage are unreported or reported as Covid infections.

How about a friendly visit from the Australian CoVID Regime version of Canada’s Integrated National Security Enforcement team?

by Lyndesy Symonds

With respect to the six people who were killed in the Tara Massacre, their families and community mourning their loss –
as a Black Op which used elements ‘in the know’ within the Big Q police force, the Tara Massacre has a political objective.

For a pre-viz, have a look at The People’s Republic of Canada. They are a bit further along with the political agenda of their CoVID Regime than we are. And already they have their legislation in place for a new type of ‘identity’ policing.

In the Big Pineapple these identities fit the ‘Train Profile’ : conspiracy theorists (who don’t buy the Official Conspiracy Theories), CoVID Incorrectness / non-compliance, anti-vaxxers, comrade citizens (read goyim) with stupid ideas about human and civil rights, sovereignty, rule of laws, the 1901 Constitution etc.

Under legislation that is pending even as I write (no – it will not be covered in Big Jew / lying media ) it will just ‘appear’ and be pushed through like the December 2020 Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies) Bill 2020. You know, the one that enables the authorization of foreign militaries / security forces under the purview of Operation CoVID Shield and indemnifies them from any civil or criminal liabilities against Australian citizens. In short, the kind of services needed for Black Ops. [ Big Shout Out here to all the One Nation Senators who voted YES ]

Under this pending legislation, if you are ID’d in one of target groups and hit the keyboard on social media or a website like Cairns News, you will be getting a friendly visit from the Australian CoVID Regime version of Canada’s Integrated National Security Enforcement team. In our version, your friendly visitors might even get to look for firearms or anything they think might be conceivably used as a weapon against the CoVID Regime. The Official Conspiracy Theorists could get very creative here: Toenail scissors for example. Stainless steel cutlery (like on airplanes), that welding equipment in the shed. Lots of possibilities.

In Canada, the The Integrated National Security Enforcement Teams now pay visits to your home for speaking out against Trudeau online.pic.twitter.com/WSQjGERhhN

— Tammy AbiKhalil (@abikhalil_t) December 15, 2022

The elderly are now firmly in the sights of United [Communist] Nations CoVID Regime

by columnist Lyndesy Symonds

Another covid whorejob professor has been trotted out by Big Jew Media to lead the CoVID Regime charge against groups prioritized for the biotech mRNA spike protein injection. The elderly are now firmly in the sights of United [Communist] Nations CoVID Regime. The professor warns of high covid casualties in aged care if the oldies don’t get themselves injected with the covid prion disease.

Covid casualties are already high and going higher across the entire population and are to be found in the excess mortality (up 18%) from the historic average variation of 1 or 2 %. Australia’s peak actuarial body, the ABS is asking questions. Therefore the need for the Australian CoVID Regime to put a new group in the frame whose ‘at risk’ status is putting us all ‘at risk’.

The December ‘covid wave’ yada yada is all over the news like a herpes rash this am. Cases are surging. The prion disease/s of this covid injection are now endemic in the community because the critical mass has been vaxxed. So (of course) those most ‘at risk’ are now being identified and prioritized.

The reason why the ‘covid wave’ is surging is because of the vaxx uptake, a mass population has now been injected with the disease and is coded to make the spike protein of their injection. But not even the gain of function for their frontline immunity is going to prevent them from becoming infectious with it.

You want to get ‘covid’ – then by all means, go and get yourself injected with it. WHEN you become infectious (and therefore transmissible), then you pass your prion disease onto others. These spike protein sequences in the injection are bio-teched to be recombinant so they will combine with other viruses and so create ‘variants’. This is not the mutation of a natural virus like the influenza and these covid demons know it, so being the picky legalists they are they use the term variants.

So now the December CoVID Correctness has a new mind f*ckery. They are getting the CoVID Correct sheeple programmed to put the pressure on ‘prioritized’ groups to get vaxxed. Supposedly they are putting others ‘at risk’ with their vulnerability. [As if the spike protein injection prevents the injectee from getting ‘covid’]. Get your covid shot for judeoXmas Grannie and Happy Trails for the New Year.

As a 70 year old Grandmother, I want to know why are so many not able to see how insidious and threatening it is to be an elderly person who is menaced by the pressure to get this shot and get injected with a prion disease.

Major Changes to CoVID-19 Testing as Summer Wave Hits. Channel 9. Dec 13, 2022

Parental online survey of child vaxx recipients is anecdotal and unfit for detailed, clinical analysis

From SMH

July 2022

Parents yet to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 are being urged not to wait amid a rise in cases among school students as new data shows side effects to the vaccine are overwhelmingly mild, and occur at lower rates than were predicted in clinical trials.

Children aged five to 15 are reporting fewer common side effects – which include a sore arm, fatigue, headaches and muscle pain – after their mRNA COVID vaccinations than those reported in clinical trials, data from national vaccine safety surveillance system AusVaxSafety shows.

An analysis of 392,268 survey responses from parents of children vaccinated between July 2021 and May 2022 showed roughly a quarter of five- to 11-year-olds reported at least one side effect within three days of their Pfizer vaccines (25 per cent following their first dose, and 28 per cent following their second).

The AMA, the political party duopoly, most medical doctors and CHO’s have no qualms whatsoever about the potentially long term deadly effects on children jabbed with mRNA Covid gene-altering concoctions which have been described as “dangerous” by inventor Dr Robert Malone.

Among 12- to 15-year-olds who received Pfizer, one in three reported at least one side effect by following their first dose (32 per cent), and half reported side effects after their second (49 per cent). One in three children in that age group who had the Moderna vaccine reported side effects after their first dose (34 per cent), and two in three following their second (64 per cent).

The survey responses were provided by parents via SMS or email.

A sore or itchy arm, redness and swelling at the injection site, fatigue, headaches and joint or muscle pain were the most common side effects among both age groups and usually faded away within a day, the researchers from the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (NCIRS) reported.

Associate Professor Nick Wood, associate director of clinical services and vaccine safety at the NCIRS and lead author of the analysis, said the rate of side effects was “probably a third lower” than were observed during clinical trials.

“When you’re in a clinical trial, you’re more closely scrutinised … [but] this data shows how it is experienced in the real world,” Wood said.

Just 0.3 per cent of five- to 15-year-olds sought medical help for their side effects, and only 7 per cent reported that their routine activities were affected.

Side effects were slightly higher in children with chronic medical conditions, which might reflect closer observation by their parents. The researchers suggested the rate of side effects could be even lower, with parents more likely to complete the survey if they noticed side effects.

Wood said the reactions experienced by children were similar to those of adults, but incidences were fewer. For example, 53 per cent of adult Pfizer recipients reported an adverse event after dose two, and 21 per cent missed routine activities such as work or study.

About 2.2 million children aged five to 15 (53 per cent) have received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine and 1.9 million (40 per cent) have received their second. Wood said he hoped parents yet to vaccinate their children would use the survey data to inform their decision.

“Forewarned is forearmed … [so] here is data to support their decision making about the vaccine,” Wood said.

Professor Robert Booy, an infectious diseases paediatrician at the University of Sydney, said the results confirmed what was being seen abroad: that younger children were experiencing fewer side effects from the vaccines.

There were no reported cases of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart) or pericarditis (swelling of the tissue surrounding the heart) in the survey data, although the Therapeutic Goods Administration has received four reports of likely myocarditis and six of likely pericarditis in children aged five to 11 and about 700 likely myocarditis and 1050 likely pericarditis cases among the 12 to 17 age group, mostly in boys.

No child or adolescent has died from a COVID-19 vaccine in Australia, a statement that cannot be supported by this survey which flies in the face of contradictory VAERS  medical data in the United States. The long-term effects of the experimental mRNA inoculation is totally unknown. The inventor of mRNA technology Dr Robert Malone has warned against its use. Cairns News

“The concern we had with older children and teenagers was myocarditis, but the reports are reassuring that this is considerably rare,” Booy said. Cairns News received anecdotal reports from the Atherton Tablelands last year that three separate adolescents two living on the same road and another nearby were all diagnosed with myocarditis (and remain permanently disabled) within weeks of getting a second vaxx.

The survey findings, which have not been peer-reviewed, were published on Thursday on medRxiv.

With the start of the school term, coronavirus infections have increased in children and teenagers, data from NSW Health’s latest surveillance report shows.

There were more than 4100 cases in children aged five to nine, up from 2600 the previous week, and more than 8500 cases in those aged 10 to 19, up from 5200.

The report also included data showing about 3 per cent of people infected with COVID-19 in January have now been reinfected.

According to NSW Health’s records, of the 639,000 cases reported in January, more than 10,000 had been reinfected within 90 days of their first positive test, 16,000 had been reinfected by the 120-day mark and 20,000 people (or 3.2 per cent) registered a positive COVID-19 test for a second time within 150 days of their first.

Cairns News: It should be noted that any diagnosed infection in this survey was performed by a PCR test, a notoriously inaccurate method described by its inventor Dr Kary Mullis as being “unfit for purpose” as a diagnostic tool for viral infections such as Covid 19.

Arrogant TGA head Dr John Skerritt ducks for cover as Roberts accuses him of vaccine impropriety

Federal Police should be investigating Professor John Skerrit’s onshore and offshore bank accounts. Former PM Scott Morrison accrued $52 Million while PM. How much has Bro John salted away? (https://cairnsnews.org/2022/02/23/scott-morrison-under-the-microscope/)

Senator ROBERTS: Can you tell me how many medicines were approved under the provisional approval pathway during the COVID period 1 July 2020 to date? My numbers are 13 vaccines and six drugs; is that correct?

Dr Skerritt: Are you talking specifically about COVID treatments and COVID vaccines?

Senator ROBERTS: No, any vaccines or drugs that have been approved using the provisional pathway.

Dr Skerritt: I will start with COVID vaccine treatments. There have been seven COVID vaccines and eight COVID treatments. I’ll just check whether I’ve got the numbers for other medicines during that period. You’re talking about the provisional approval pathway?

Senator ROBERTS: Yes.

Dr Skerritt: From 1 July this year there have been five provisional approvals. From the period 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022 there have been 23. That would include those COVID treatments. What it does show is a lot of other medicines, such as cancer medicines, such as medicines for rare conditions, have also been approved. In the financial year 2021, from 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022, there were five. Over the period you’re talking about, that would add up to 33.

Therapeutic Goods Authority chief Professor John Skerritt under fire for allowing Pfizer’s toxic clot shot to kill and maim kids and adults

Senator ROBERTS: How many drugs have been approved under the normal process during that same period?

Dr Skerritt: During the same period? I will add the three financial years and I’ll check my mental arithmetic. So 36 this current financial year, and 117. These are either new approvals or new indications approved. And 95 the year before. So, it is a significant percentage, but not most of them.

Senator ROBERTS: Is the maximum provisional approval period six years because it can take that long to get drugs approved under the old approval system?

Dr Skerritt: A provisional approval is only valid for two years and then the company either has to come back and show why they cannot obtain all the data within the period and apply for an extension.

Senator ROBERTS: No, the maximum provisional approval?

Dr Skerritt: They can apply for further lots of two years.

Senator ROBERTS: Is the maximum provisional approval—

Dr Skerritt: Overall the maximum period is six years, but it’s not six years off the bat.

Senator ROBERTS: It’s two years with extensions.

Dr Skerritt: They are possible extensions; they’re not guaranteed.

Senator ROBERTS: How much money do you save pharmaceutical companies by switching from full approval to express approval? I understand it’s hundreds of millions per approval?

Dr Skerritt: It actually costs the pharmaceutical companies more in regulatory fees for provisional approval.

Senator ROBERTS: No, I didn’t say regulatory fees. How much are you saving the pharmaceutical companies by giving them express or provisional approval rather than going through the six-year period for getting proper approval?

Dr Skerritt: No, you’ve misinterpreted the system. It’s not a six-year period to get full regulatory approval.

Senator ROBERTS: It varies. I accept that.

Dr Skerritt: Most of our approvals are submitted as a standard approval, especially, for example, if it wasn’t a public health emergency or it’s a drug that already has others in the same category. They’re submitted as a standard approval.

Senator ROBERTS: Dedicated trials for their drugs, I understand, can be hundreds of millions of dollars. How much time and money would they save by going express?

Dr Skerritt: We would not give a provisional approval to a medicine unless there were clinical trials.

Senator ROBERTS: How much money does it save if they do a provisional without doing a formal or normal approval process? How much money does it save the drug company?

Dr Skerritt: I don’t believe there are necessarily savings. The situation would be different for every drug. It’s really important to emphasise there were very extensive clinical trials for the vaccines and treatments that have been through provisional approval.

Senator ROBERTS: My understanding is that it can cost hundreds of millions of dollars to get the full approval process. Without the dedicated trial, they could save hundreds of millions of dollars per drug?

Dr Skerritt: I don’t necessarily agree with you.

Senator ROBERTS: When does the provisional approval for Pfizer expire?

Dr Skerritt: The two-year period will be two years from the anniversary of the first approval. I would emphasise that in certain countries—

Senator ROBERTS: What is that date?

Dr Skerritt: The products are now fully approved.

Senator ROBERTS: What is the date of provisional approval expiry?

Dr Skerritt: For the very first approval, for 16 years and over, the two-year period finishes on 25 January 2023.

Senator ROBERTS: I have in front of me a document called the Australian Public Assessment Report for Tozinameran, from Comirnaty (Pfizer), dated December 2021. Is this the approval application for the paediatric version of the Pfizer vaccine?

Dr Skerritt: No, it is not. An Australian Public Assessment Report is a summary of the assessment that we did of the application. You mentioned Pfizer. The actual application is over 220,000 thousand pages of paper from Pfizer for that particular group of vaccines.

Senator ROBERTS: I reference page 61, which states:

Limitations of the current application data. Safety follow-up is currently limited to median 2.4 months post dose 2 in cohort 1, and 2.4 weeks for the safety expansion cohort.

What is the safety expansion cohort?

Dr Skerritt: Remember, also, this was going back to the time of approval. We now have hundreds of millions, actually more than a billion, people who have been vaccinated with that vaccine and experience going on since December 2020, when the first vaccination was done. The safety expansion cohort is in a clinical trial where individuals are monitored closely and the data reported back to regulators for periods of months, leading to years, after their vaccination.

Senator ROBERTS: Did you recommend this substance based on 2.4 weeks of safety testing or did you get more in? If so, over what period? How many months?

Dr Skerritt: Remember the initial approval from TGA was based on that two months of follow-up, but we also had the experience of other countries that had more than a month before starting mass vaccination campaigns. When we approved Pfizer on 25 January2021, we were in almost daily contact with the British, who by that stage had vaccinated millions of British people by 25 January 2021. Real-world evidence played a very important role in both the approvals and in the ongoing safety monitoring of these vaccines.

Senator ROBERTS: So you relied on data from other countries and you relied for periods of months, merely months. It can’t be more than six months, because there’s a gap between application and approval and to give time for collection of data and analysis. There should be years of data before we start putting this stuff into our children, yet it’s months.

Dr Skerritt: I disagree in the context of a pandemic and a public health crisis. Regulators globally felt that it was appropriate to do initial approvals—

Senator ROBERTS: You’re the Australian regulator.

Dr Skerritt: As the head of the Australian regulator, I would do precisely the same if I had my time again. The alternative would have been to leave Australians unvaccinated through the course of 2020, 2021 and 2022, and there would have been tens of thousands more Australian deaths.

Senator ROBERTS: Can I reference a letter from the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, signed by Radha Khiani, Director, Governance and Coordination section, in which the department makes this claim. The letter from 4 November 2022, just last week, states:

A large team of technical and clinical experts at the TGA carefully evaluated the data submitted by the sponsor. A treatment or vaccine is only provisionally approved if this rigorous process is completed.

This document concerned the use of Pfizer stages 2 to 3 cynical trial data in support of their application for provisional approval. Did the TGA check the stage 2 and stage 3 clinical trial data from Pfizer? Did you check it?

Dr Skerritt: We did check the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data from Pfizer and we also took it to independent external medical experts as well as consumer representatives.

Senator ROBERTS: Referencing Freedom of Information No. 2289, in which the applicant requested a copy of the stage 2 and stage 3 clinical trial data, the TGA responded that the ‘TGA does not hold any relevant documents relating to the request’. That was a request for stages 2 to 3 clinical trial data.

Dr Skerritt: Without seeing what’s in your hand, I believe that you asked for individual patient data rather than the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. I can give you my word that we assessed the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data; otherwise, what else did we do? Look at the colour of the label on the bottle? That is the main thing our team of several thousand clinicians look at in reviewing a new vaccine, the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data. It is the centrepiece.

Senator ROBERTS: The freedom-of-information request then asked for ‘any documents confirming the process of analysing this data to a decision, including meetings, notes, dates and times’. Again the TGA replied, ‘We have no relevant documents.’ Did you review the stage 2 and stage 3 data or not, and, if you did, why did you tell this freedom-of-information applicant you did not have these documents? Which document is the lie? One of them is.

Dr Skerritt: I don’t have that document in front of me. We can review it on notice. But we reviewed the phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trial data at length.

CHAIR: This really needs to be the last one so I can share the call.

Senator ROBERTS: I just want you to think about this and confirm it or otherwise: and ‘the trail data contained sufficient proof the vaccines were safe and effective, sufficient to meet the criteria for provisional approval’; is that correct?

Dr Skerritt: Correct. Yes.

A real statesman of the Australian Senate exposes the Covid scam – let the trials begin of those who killed or injured thousands of Australians by experimental vaxx

I have no doubt that, as the truth comes to light, history will judge those in this Parliament as cowards for failing to stand up against the COVID B.S.

Read the study, COVID-19 vaccines – An Australian Review by Conny Turni and Astrid Lefringhausen here.

Watch the COVID INQUIRY 2.0 videos here.

Hansard: As a servant to the people of Queensland and Australia, I note that at the European parliament inquiry into COVID two weeks ago, Janine Small, the President of International Developed Markets for Pfizer revealed that the Pfizer vaccine injection was never tested to see if it would prevent transmission—never tested. Small went on to say this was because Pfizer had to work at the speed of science. Well, it seems the speed of science and the velocity of money are the same thing. Shameful decisions were taken deliberately to facilitate big pharma getting their injections to market in time. The mouthpiece media have the same large investment funds on their share register as big pharma. It’s no surprise the mouthpiece media amplified the COVID scare, doubling down on fear porn and demonising anyone who clung to ‘my body, my choice’, just so the media’s shareholders could line their pockets with tens of billions of dollars in windfall profits.

I remember when the political left walked behind banners reading ‘my body, my choice’. Now real conservatives hold those banners high while the Left abuse us. How fast the Left abandon their principles when an opportunity to tell people what to do comes along, to control people. It was clear after just four months of COVID the scary Chinese videos of people dropping dead in the streets should not have been taken at face value. Measures taken out of an abundance of caution in March 2020 should have been re-examined just a few months later, as we requested and suggested. They never were. At the time, the data clearly showed COVID was no more deadly than a severe flu and well under anything the public would consider to be a pandemic. Let me support that statement.

The following data is from the Australian Bureau of Statistics published in part as a result of a One Nation document discovery a few weeks ago. In 2019, the year before COVID, the seasonal flu cost 4,126 lives. The next year, in 2020, Australia recorded 882 deaths from COVID and 2,287 deaths from the flu for a total of 3,196 deaths, 1,000 less than before COVID, almost a thousand less than the flu alone killed the previous year. In 2021, 1,137 deaths were recorded from COVID and 2,073 from the flu, for a total of 3,210. This means deaths from the flu including COVID across the first two years of the so-called pandemic were right on the long-term average of 3,255. There was nothing unusual about the Australian death rate in 2020 or 2021 yet the COVID substances—I won’t call them vaccines—the COVID injections, were given emergency approval. The only thing about our death rate in 2020 that was unusual was that it was at a seven-year low.

These are facts. This makes a joke of provisional approval granted for injections out of urgency. There was no urgency. It is not just the vaccines that were inappropriately approved; dangerous drugs like the antiviral Remdesivir were waved through using the same false urgency. Remdesivir’s side effects include respiratory failure and organ failure. The perfectly safe but out-of-patent antiviral ivermectin was banned to make way for remdesivir—banned, proven, banned. The UK has recently put ivermectin back into use. We must as well. The conclusion an increasing number of Australians are coming to is that our health technocrats tore up our tried and true health systems to shift products for their mates in the pharmaceutical industry, and now people are dying from those same products.

Once the injection rollout started, there was a spike in deaths. It must be noted correlation is not causation. The link between the cause—vaccines—and the effect—death, injury and suffering—must be proven. Well, it has now been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. At my second COVID Under Question inquiry in August, many highly-qualified medical professionals from around the world established that link, providing evidence the injections were responsible for many more deaths than the health technocrats admit.

Late last month, the Clinical and Experimental Immunology journal published an article entitled ‘COVID-19 vaccines—an Australian review’. The authors are Conny Turni and Astrid Lefringhausen, from the University of Queensland. This article details the medical science behind the wide range of medical harms inflicted on Australians as a result of the hubris and the criminal negligence of health technocrats. I promised to hound you people down, and now science has done that for me. The issue of vaccine harm must be referred to a royal commission today. These criminals must be brought to justice. This report is reproduced on my website, and anyone who reads this report and still defends the fake vaccines is as guilty as the companies that made it.

It’s no surprise that COVID has spiked in correlation with the rollout of the fake vaccines. ABS data is not yet available for 2022, although Australian actuarial data is. In the first four months of 2022, death from all respiratory diseases—the flu, pneumonia and COVID taken together—is still at normal levels, yet deaths from cardiac and pulmonary events are up 11 per cent, and unexplained deaths are up 13 per cent. At this rate, an extra 10,000 Australians will die in 2022. Anyone reading the journal article I referred to will know exactly why this is happening. I refuse to believe our health technocrats do not know. A royal commission must ask what they knew and when.

In May 2020 I criticised fear-driven response to COVID in the Senate, within months of this mismanagement of COVID. At that time Senator Hanson and I were the lone voices of dissent in the Senate, and Craig Kelly and George Christensen were the lone voices in the other place, and Senators Rennick and Antic joined us—six representatives out of 227 people. Everyone else in both houses displayed an ignorance of proper scientific process, an inability to read empirical data and a misplaced trust of health bureaucrats. Health technocrats have spent their entire professional lives working closely with the pharmaceutical industry. And we expected them to be impartial. Come on! We delegated authority to the last people who should have been trusted with that authority.

The Senate is the house of review. Every aspect of our COVID response should have been scrutinised to the last detail. The Senate failed in that mission. COVID measures were beyond question, and it seems they still are. Rather than review, the Senate covered up. Senators Rennick and Antic, in company with myself and Senator Hanson, tried to draw out the truth and were demonised for doing so. Not one senator amongst the political Left entertained a moment’s thought that fear-driven response could be harming more people than it helped. ‘Resistance is futile’ was the message repeated at every press conference on every television in every house of parliament. New Zealand, Canada, the UK and America all joined in the circus of despair, designed to scare people into taking a substance they knew would cause serious harm and death.

Even today, vaccine mandates are still in place around Australia. The reality of a falling birth rate, unexplained increases in deaths and more than 130,000 cases of vaccine harm here in Australia is being ignored. Still, we are told the injection is safe and effective. Safe and effective is not one lie; it is two lies. The vaccine is neither safe nor effective. Medical practitioners who stood up for the rights of their patients were deregistered after action from big pharma’s enforcement arm, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency—under the direction, it seems, of CEO Martin Fletcher and Yvette D’Ath, as chair of the Health Ministers Meeting. They’re the ones who were in control. These technocrats decided they knew what was best for patients—better than the patient’s own doctor. AHPRA must be referred to the royal commission—and the TGA, ATAGI, the Chief Medical Officer, the secretary of the federal health department and Greg Hunt, the federal health minister at the time.

The vaccine emergency use authorisation expires early next year. An inquiry into how the vaccines went would normally be conducted, but they need to stop now. The emergency authorisation needs to stop. I do not have confidence the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the TGA, and the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation, ATAGI, will be honest and impartial in this inquiry. They have not been so far. Only a royal commission can decide all of the issues I have raised tonight. One royal commissioner will not be enough for the litany of legal and regulatory abuse, medical practice, financial malfeasance, conflict of interest, child abuse, human rights abuse and the shredding of international agreements Australia has endured for 2½ years.

The harm from our COVID response was foreseeable and preventable. If only the Senate, the ultimate house of review, had had the courage to stand up and call bullshit. The Senate did not.

The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT ( Senator Chandler ): Order! Senator Roberts, that language isn’t parliamentary. I ask that you withdraw or find another word.

Senator ROBERTS: I retract that—the brown stuff.

The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT: Thank you.

Senator ROBERTS: The Senate did not. As a result, the public has lost confidence in the medical profession, health administration and politicians. To his credit, member of parliament Dan Tehan publicly admitted his silence last year was wrong. This week a survey in the Daily Telegraph found that, based on the 50,000 respondents, 37 per cent of Australians who took the vaccine regret it. Only 43 per cent said they would do it again. The damage to the reputation of our once-trusted medical institutions can only be repaired with a royal commission to unravel the lies and get to the truth, and, in so doing, ensure this tyranny, this suffering and this loss of life never happens again.

I have no doubt that, when the truth comes to light, history will judge those in this place as being cowards all. We have one flag, we are one community, we are one nation, and Australians want justice.

Australia’s political parasites in the crosshairs with Max Igan and Maria Zee

No virus exists or has ever existed

Letter to the Editor

I thought you might be interested in the excellent and accurate articles and videos produced by Doctors Sam and Mark Bailey from Christchurch New Zealand.

The latest article (I put only the summary on my website plus links to the full 67-page article, as below) explains in rigorous detail why no virus exists or has ever existed. The arguments and evidence are the most compelling I’ve ever seen, including the PCR test fraud.

http://better-management.org/http:/better-management.org/topics/uncategorized/governance/

Congratulations on your excellent website, newsletters and their content. As the ex-GM of a major NZ broadsheet, I am appalled at how far most MSM have sunk to being little more than propaganda sheets now.

Best wishes,

Peter Senior, BSc.(Hons), Fellow NZIMC

Cairns

%d bloggers like this: