From a Constitutional analyst
To Prime Minister Albanese and
All Members and Senators, a draft letter
You are all either a Member of the House of Representatives or Senator. It is universally accepted that you are the High Court of Parliament. All law that comes out of the High Court of Parliament is made by you after you as judges, decide by majority whether it is worthy of enactment. When called upon to make that judgment you have in the Evidence Act 1995 given yourselves power to consider matters of common knowledge. The Constitution in S 79 tells us the Parliament of the Commonwealth can prescribe how many judges can sit there. And has prescribed 151 in the House of Representatives and 76 in the Senate. It is now a matter of common knowledge worldwide that the United States of America Inc, has to find 12 trillion dollars in 2024. By S 144 (2) Evidence Act 1995 you may acquire knowledge of that kind in any way the judge (meaning you) thinks fit. You have Rules of Court and they are called Standing Orders. Like all Courts of Law you must have ways to enforce your judgments or you are of no utility. Yours are the Privilege provisions and the Parliament of the Commonwealth has used it once to imprison two people in 1955.
The High Court as presently constituted has been sitting in contempt of the Parliament of the United Kingdom since its inception. In S 12 High Court Procedure Act 1903 it was prescribed by the Parliament of the Commonwealth that One Judge could constitute The High Court. The Parliament of the United Kingdom prescribed three one of whom had to be the Chief Justice. It is a matter of common knowledge that you can all read and write. S 16 Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 the Hansard of a Parliament is admissible as evidence when judges are making a decision. On the 14th May 1900 Joseph Chamberlain in the House of Commons guaranteed the honesty and integrity of the Parliament of the Commonwealth in these words.
This Constitution is to be an Imperial act and it is, in substance, the delegation of powers to an authority which is created by the Imperial Parliament. And this follows: The responsibility for the action of the Parliament of Australia and its legislation rests with us.
The Hansard record of the repeal of the Lawyer and Sheriffs in Parliament Act of 1372 in 1870 by the Parliament of the United Kingdom shows that it was not repealed for the colonies. The Parliament of the United Kingdom banned lawyers as a menace to society for 498 years. Your researchers can check the Parliamentary Library but if they do not have it, the 1870 Hansard, the University of New South Wales in Sydney has.
HALSBURY’S STATUTES OF ENGLAND
46 Edward III AD 1372
80. Lawyers and Sheriffs excluded from Parliament
WHEREAS men of the law who follow divers businesses in the king’s courts on behalf of private persons, with whom they are, do procure and cause to be brought into parliament many petitions in the name of the commons, which in no wise relate to them, but only the private persons with whom they are engaged; also sheriffs who are common officers for the people, and ought to be abiding in their office, for the doing right to every one, are named, and have heretofore been and returned to parliament knights of the shires, by the same sheriffs; it is accorded and assented in this parliament, that hereafter no man of the law following business in the king’s court, nor any sheriff for the time that he is sheriff, be returned nor accepted knights of the shires; nor that they who are men of the law and sheriffs now returned to parliament have any wages; but the king willeth that knights and sergeants of the most worthy of the county be hereafter returned knights in parliament; and that they be elected in full county.
The long arm of English law still reaches into the Commonwealth. It does so through the Court of Faculties that has an office in Westminster Abbey in London. At Common Law and in equity all people are created equal before Almighty God. This is confirmed by Article 14 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights you have enacted carrying seventeen years imprisonment when ignored by S 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995. This makes and reinforces the ban on Star Chamber Courts enacted in 1640.the Habeas Corpus Act 1640 (Imp) by a $280,500 fine enforceable by a Bill of Exchange issued under S 4B Crimes Act 1914. P/2
I read somewhere years ago that Queen Victoria signed our Constitution in 1900, and a condition of it was that it was to be installed within 6 months, which it was.
Remember that this was done in Great Britain and Ireland, etc., etc., by their parliament. They altered and corrected parts of our original Australian version by A. Deakin.
So it is highly unlikely that She was sick and did not sign it !!
Our Australian Constitution original title was “The British Colony of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)” and was installed on the 1st of January 1901, but in 1907, the British Parliament changed Australia’s status to that of a Dominion.
We are not independant until the British Parliament repeals this Act and formally declares Australia to be a truly independant nation.
Then we can create our own up to date genuine Constitution.
Read The Australian Constitution as it is ACTUALLY WRITTEN by GRAHAM L PATERSON.
We are by law required to have a lawfully and traditionally installed Monarch and who chooses our Governor General…not chosen by a party political prime minister.
Trudeau’s Canada is the poster boy for Marxist laws that empower the Identity Cadres of the Long March to be offended and through their offense to enable the Communist state to strike at the racial, ethnic, class, religion, gender enemy of Diversity , Equity and Inclusion.
For anyone who might not be aware of whom that enemy might be, that would be the White, Christian, male Canadian of a European national heritage and stock who identifies in those terms.
If a bill now before the Canadian Parliament is passed – any BLIPOC, Satanist, woman identifying as a man or some creative gender or as a Moclan takes offense at something he says and a court finds he is motivated by hate – he is in jail for life.
Canada considers life sentences for offending someone
[…] Pages: 12 […]
Commenter Alison
Don’t be sorry, allow me to make the implication then, they are dumb &/or lazy, conniving, corrupt, devious and malicious
advaustralia, your comment is first class.
The big problem with trying to understand Australian law is that the lawyers designing the “law” deliberately put several topics into the one piece of legislation so as to make it all incomprehensible. Most Australians including myself have had no training in the gobble-gook of supposed law and the legislation passed by politicians who also know nothing of what they are voting on. Most times only a few politicians are in the Chamber to gain any knowledge or information on what is in the Bill, yet are allowed to vote on that Bill. This to me is TREASON, passing or rejecting legislation that can be against the interests of the people.
Correction commenter Joe:
I’m sorry if my comment carried any implication or suggestion that my Senators or H of R MP are “dumb or lazy.” That was certainly not my intention. All I conveyed was that NO reply was received from any, and I don’t know why. Still it’s very grievous that my concerns were not answered. This is their job.
It was only by Gods leading that I found out in the evening about this bill and on the very last day open for submissions. And, blow me down, this very bill, was what I had written about in my letter. What astounded me was the letter from the PM’s department never informed me that this bill was before The Parliament, if I was interested to follow it. And, by extension, that meant that none of my representatives in The Parliament either informed me this bill was afoot. (I could hazard a guess but should ask them first if my guess would be correct) Yet, this bill is legislating for a new federation and new Federal-State system and includes an open cheque to further amendments. WHAT A BILL.
And I am also astounded that so few submissions have been received. Perhaps since God in whom I trust alerted me, wouldn’t it be wonderful if by his mercy and grace God stopped this bill again. You know our real Commoñwealth Constitution, that’s being trampled into oblivion, comes with the trust of the people in Almighty God. God is almighty, and yet he cares for all people. This bill is not taking God by surprise – faith declares, with him, nothing is impossible. Amen ( means yea, yea let it be so)
People don’t even know what commenter Alison’s bill is, or understand creeping Globalism, and how we are betrayed by these red-blue-green-teal representatives. She implies they are too dumb &/or lazy to even read &/or reply to her letters.
As we are collectively also too dumb &/or lazy we will have to suffer the consequences. By next election will be too late, we will be in the thick of SEERS 2025-28. The hysteria will be turned up and the sheeple will vote for “a safe pair of hands” whatever that may be at the time.
It’s there for everyone to send. Ed
As the USA was hijacked starting 1812, it seems likely to me that Australia was hijacked 1901. The story goes that QV1 was sick on the day and did not sign. All the fine words mean nothing legally without the signature. QV1 died a few weeks later, and weeks or months travel by sea. Perhaps the constitution was “pending” up to the date of “INC.” and now we are legally elsewhere. The law of course initiates the funding, of military and everything else.
What’s also interesting is that NZ was supposedly invited to join the Federation but as we know it already had some other constitutional arrangements, founded on a Treaty. Maybe this was a problem, and the actual reason they declined. Maybe the Maories would have blown the whole thing wide open.
advaustralia said – “… the courts are sitting in TREASON…”
Yes, and we’re NEVER going to obtain a solution going through THEIR fake corporate structures, because they’re our ADVERSARIES.
Some very relevant noise coming out of Canada right about now, having DIRECT RELEVANCE to our predicament here in Australia…
.com/2024/03/total-despotism-christopher-james/
(stick “sgtreport” at the front, and start at around 7:30 into the video)
Common Law and People’s Courts are clearly desirable outcomes, but IMO GETTING THERE is the biggest hurdle facing us, because we have the INSTITUTIONALISED INERTIA of millions of clueless Australians and literal PRIVATE ARMIES of HIRED MERCENARY CORPORATE ENFORCERS standing in our way in every Australian state and territory.
More reasons to pile on and support Commo John’s proposed National Strike to clear a path through the BS Globalist corporate TYRANNY, put all these sold-out baby-eating MONGREL BASTARDS in their place and recover our SOVEREIGNTY.
A bill currently awaiting enactment and forwarded onto a Senate Inquiry Committee is the COAG Legislation Amendmeñt Bill 2023 [Provisions]. This bill was first brought before the last parliament bý the Morrison government in 2021 and it didn’t pass.
The Bill proposes to substitute the words “First Ministers’ Council ” for COAG. The Albanese government wants to keep evolving the Lib/Lab reform agenda for a new federalism into the future. The Bill proposes to change COAG Reform Fund to Federation Reform Fund. Principally, references to COAG are to be renamed Federation.
The Bill would amend also the following Acts: Federal Financial Relations Act, Fuel Indexation Road Funding Special Àccount, DisabilityCare Australia Fund, Disaster Ready Fund, Future Drought Fund, Medical Research Future Fund, Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage, Proceeds of Crime, and Housing Australia Future Fund
The proposed First Ministers’ Council (of PM, Premiers, CMs) will comprise First Ministers such as the National Cabinet, and other representatives such as ALGA.
This is treachery against the Commonwealth Constitution 1901 as it recognises no third tier of government (eg: Local Government) after the 1988 referendum.
These proposals seek to further eradicate by law any form of outward resemblance to the 1901 Federation. Our 1901 Çommonweath Constitution died in 1973 when the Queen of Australia was enacted, and since then successive governments have further corrupted our system of government to a Corporatised Australian system of government, Politicians established a business entity called the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA which is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for global business purposes. The registration number is 0000805157. [Credit: Alan Manson, Submission-Traditional Rights and Freedoms-Encroachments by Commonwealth Laws (ALŔC Interim Report 127)]
It’s 50 years since this act of treason.
And right now there are Senators in a Committee of Inquiry considering this COAG Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 and its Provisions which will throw Australians further into technocratic over-rule by scientific so-called experts, private corporations and foreign global powers.
Are we content to throw care to the wind when this new architecture (the art and technique of designing and drawing up a plan and building structures) for federal-state relations is afoot in The Parliament?
I would advise others who are concerned to contact their representatives and protest.
It certainly is pointing the way to a Republic, which Australians rejected in a 1999 referendum.
I had written letters of concern to all my Senators, and to my H of R MP oñ the 14th and 6th November 2023 respectively, and I received not one reply from any of them regarding this new federation structure, these Ministerial Councils and the National Cabinet.
Thankfully, my letter written to the PM on the 14th November was replied to by the PM’s Department on 8 January 2024, but the Department’s letter did not inform me that the COAG Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 [Provisions] was already introduced into the H of R on 29 November 2023 and was before The Parliament.
There have been only 3 submissions so far to the Committee of Inquiry published online for this bill. This is a tragedy. Perhaps if people read the bill and contacted their representatives it may fail to pass again.
Humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God.
tonyryan43 said – “… we can arrest the entire Parliament and install an interim administration, which is perfectly legal, and thenceforth create all legislation through referenda.”
True enough, when we consider the technical legalities of the situation.
Meanwhile, we have the teensy weensy issue of HUGE PRIVATE ARMIES of shit-for-brains mentally retarded HIRED MERCENARY GANGSTERS entrenched across every Australian state and territory to VIOLENTLY ENFORCE the BELLIGERENT OCCUPATION of our country by the foreign-owned COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION.
So we really need some way to BRIDGE the gap between what we technically can LEGALLY do, and what we can accomplish in REAL LIFE in the face of FOREIGN-OWNED ARMIES of HOSTILE MILITARISED MERCENARY FORCES impersonating “police” and sold-out foreign-owned corporate baby-eating PAEDOPHILES masquerading as our “judiciary” and as our “government”.
… and Paul said – “We know we know we know & here is remedy…”
Paul GETS it.
… and from Alison on another forum thread…
.com/@BrigalowBill:e/CMJ-Interview-with-John-Wilson-March-5,-2024:7
(stick “odysee” at the front)
That is a bit like threatening a burglar with the scabbard of your sword. The actuaL aword is High Court Chief Justice Harry Gibbs’s determination that Australia’s government is unlawful. Using this weapon, we can arrest the entire Parliament and install an interim administration, which is perfectly legal, and thenceforth create all legislation through referenda.
This would resolve every one of Australia’s critical issues, including the WEF/NWO, national sovereignty, racist legislation and services, and abuse of human rights.
Well written.
This is titled as DRAFT Letter>> was a final letter actually sent… otherwise….
Their symbolism will be their downfall 🔺🔻🪬
We know we know we know & here is remedy
http://www.nationalstrike.org
Get onit when you can people & share 🙏🏼🌞
This article not only points out that the courts are sitting in TREASON, but it also shows that electing political party members who are bound first and foremost to vote according to party lines cannot ever give us good government. Constitution Sections 7 and 24 specifically deny political parties any place in our Parliament. Both sections mandate that ONLY we the people have the power and authority to choose our representatives. Political parties do not represent the views of all Australians. In fact, most of them are dangerous to our nation and our democracy, because they are bought and paid for by big business and special interests with money. That’s not the type of government We the People want.
We want government that is composed of ordinary people who step up to give their time and energy to creating and maintaining good government that benefits the community. We want representatives who are not bound by party policy, who will make decisions based on the needs and will of the people. Our 5-Point Plan will achieve this. Please take the time to read it and then decide what you are willing to do to create a better future for our nation and our children.
https://advance-australia.com.au/
[…] Pages: 12 […]
[…] Pages: 12 […]
[…] Pages: 12 […]