We are all judges in law. When we see evidence of a crime and report it to a responsible authority our judgment deserves to be investigated and either upheld of rejected. When brought to the attention of the Prime Minister or Attorney General or any Member of the Parliament or Senator, they have a duty to order an investigation and advise the person who has made the information available to them, of the outcome. Because we have Lawyers in Parliament they have invented ways to stop offenders from their class of people being held to account. We have around 22 lawyers in the Australian Labor Party and around 14 in the Co-alition in the House of Representatives.
You have declared in S 80 Judiciary Act 1903 that the criminal and civil jurisdiction of all courts is governed by the Common Law. Common law to govern So far as the laws of the Commonwealth are not applicable or so far as their provisions are insufficient to carry them into effect, or to provide adequate remedies or punishment, the common law in Australia as modified by the Constitution and by the statute law in force in the State or Territory in which the Court in which the jurisdiction is exercised is held shall, so far as it is applicable and not inconsistent with the Constitution and the laws of the Commonwealth govern all Courts exercising federal jurisdiction in the exercise of their jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters.
The Lawyers in Parliament have allowed Lawyers in Court as Judges in Court to subvert and bastardise the delivery of justice by Rules of Court. Lawyers in Parliament have persuaded the Parliament of the Commonwealth to pay Judges and Magistrates large salaries, so they are bought and paid for as if they are whores. Typically a Federal Court of Australia Judge gets two and a half times the salary as a judge (you) in the Parliament of the Commonwealth. These bought and paid for Judges in Court to deliver on their very adequate salaries, have to protect their master, the State or Australian Government who pays their salary.
The Lawyers in Parliament to protect themselves had enacted in 1975 the Common Informers (Parliamentary Disqualifications) Act 1975. in it the Lawyers in Parliament conspired with the rest and repealed without a referendum S 46 Constitution. In S 3 they set the penalty at $200 per day. In S 4 they had the Parliament of the Commonwealth abolish s 46 Constitution, and in S 5 they granted original jurisdiction to the High Court and made it exclusive of all other courts. I put it to you that this makes the High Court the Harlot of Babylon people by bought and paid for individuals drawn from their own profession exclusively. That S 77 (i,) Constitution expressly forbids this is immaterial to these self-serving individuals.
S 46 Constitution provides a penalty in 1900 of the sum of one hundred pounds to any person who sues for it in any court of competent jurisdiction. In 1900 a pound was a Sovereign, and was 7.4 grams of pure gold. S 115 Constitution prohibits the creation of legal tender as anything but gold and silver and gold in 1900 was worth $20.67 an ounce. With 31 grams in a troy ounce of gold an ounce of gold today is over $3000. A gram is worth $100. A pound in 1900 was worth approximately $740.00 in today’s money. One hundred pounds was $74,000. A court of competent jurisdiction must be a Ch III Constitution court. So you as judges in a Ch III court, the High Court of Parliament must use your own authority to disallow this act of bastardry enacted to protect lawyers and all Lawyers in Parliament by applying S 15A Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
On the 23rd February in Adelaide one Justice Natalie Charlesworth when confronted with an Affidavit of Michael Thomas of the family Holt refused to deal with allegations of judicial and Australian Government corruption in a case SAD 52 of 2023. You are getting the same affidavit with this correspondence. You are called upon to deal with it as she should have. On 29th February 2024 she published her Reasons for Judgment. They do not address the challenge to the jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia sought under S 31 (1) Bankruptcy Act 1966 and the request for jury trial. That was supported by the evidence in the attached Affidavit.
This is an extract from Blackstone’s Commentaries you should consider in the light of S 80 Judiciary Act 1903.
Whereas Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England Vol 3 Page 160. supported by A HISTORY OF ENGLISH LAW by Sir William Holdsworth KC DCL Hon LLD. Volume X. both state that: For it is part of the contract entered into by all mankind who partake of the benefits of society to submit in all points to the municipal constitutions and local ordinances of the state of which each individual is a member. Whatever the law orders any one to pay that becomes instantly a debt which he has beforehand contracted to pay.
Your contract of service arises under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and Constitution. In view of the terms of S 46 Constitution, the Lawyers in Parliament should not be there if the above cited Act is still in force. With the disabling of the authority of S 46 Constitution, it would appear we are without a remedy, but the Common Law supplies one and an Invoice can and should issue to each and every Lawyer in Parliament from each and every elector in their electorate and elsewhere. You are part of the “courts judges and people” of 5 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900. The Lawyers in Parliament should be given an opportunity to resign.
If they do not an Invoice which is a Bill of Exchange and an instrument under S 5 of the Bills of Exchange Act 1909 can be issued to them. S 8 defines a Bill of Exchange.
(1) A bill of exchange is an unconditional order in writing, ( in other words an invoice) addressed by one person to another, signed by the person giving it, requiring the person to whom it is addressed to pay on demand, or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in money to or to the order of a specified person or to bearer.
If not paid it can be protested by a Notary Public. Once protested it can be entered on the Personal Property Securities Register as an act of insolvency. That then causes S 44 (iii) Constitution insolvent to be activated. A Notary Public is an independent individual appointed under the laws of England, to certify judgments and other international instruments. Once a Bill of Exchange is presented it becomes a presentment and by the definitions in the Crimes Act 1914 S 4A an indictment. Only a jury and not a Judge can discharge an obligation so created under S 80 Constitution.
We have a problem class in the Commonwealth of Australia. It is called the legal profession. They have used their positions of power to create an aristocracy and destroy democracy with Star Chamber Courts. As our representatives it is your duty to bring them under control.
Yours in great sincerity,
A Citizen
Send this to your federal member and senators.
I read somewhere years ago that Queen Victoria signed our Constitution in 1900, and a condition of it was that it was to be installed within 6 months, which it was.
Remember that this was done in Great Britain and Ireland, etc., etc., by their parliament. They altered and corrected parts of our original Australian version by A. Deakin.
So it is highly unlikely that She was sick and did not sign it !!
Our Australian Constitution original title was “The British Colony of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)” and was installed on the 1st of January 1901, but in 1907, the British Parliament changed Australia’s status to that of a Dominion.
We are not independant until the British Parliament repeals this Act and formally declares Australia to be a truly independant nation.
Then we can create our own up to date genuine Constitution.
Read The Australian Constitution as it is ACTUALLY WRITTEN by GRAHAM L PATERSON.
We are by law required to have a lawfully and traditionally installed Monarch and who chooses our Governor General…not chosen by a party political prime minister.
Trudeau’s Canada is the poster boy for Marxist laws that empower the Identity Cadres of the Long March to be offended and through their offense to enable the Communist state to strike at the racial, ethnic, class, religion, gender enemy of Diversity , Equity and Inclusion.
For anyone who might not be aware of whom that enemy might be, that would be the White, Christian, male Canadian of a European national heritage and stock who identifies in those terms.
If a bill now before the Canadian Parliament is passed – any BLIPOC, Satanist, woman identifying as a man or some creative gender or as a Moclan takes offense at something he says and a court finds he is motivated by hate – he is in jail for life.
Canada considers life sentences for offending someone
[…] Pages: 12 […]
Commenter Alison
Don’t be sorry, allow me to make the implication then, they are dumb &/or lazy, conniving, corrupt, devious and malicious
advaustralia, your comment is first class.
The big problem with trying to understand Australian law is that the lawyers designing the “law” deliberately put several topics into the one piece of legislation so as to make it all incomprehensible. Most Australians including myself have had no training in the gobble-gook of supposed law and the legislation passed by politicians who also know nothing of what they are voting on. Most times only a few politicians are in the Chamber to gain any knowledge or information on what is in the Bill, yet are allowed to vote on that Bill. This to me is TREASON, passing or rejecting legislation that can be against the interests of the people.
Correction commenter Joe:
I’m sorry if my comment carried any implication or suggestion that my Senators or H of R MP are “dumb or lazy.” That was certainly not my intention. All I conveyed was that NO reply was received from any, and I don’t know why. Still it’s very grievous that my concerns were not answered. This is their job.
It was only by Gods leading that I found out in the evening about this bill and on the very last day open for submissions. And, blow me down, this very bill, was what I had written about in my letter. What astounded me was the letter from the PM’s department never informed me that this bill was before The Parliament, if I was interested to follow it. And, by extension, that meant that none of my representatives in The Parliament either informed me this bill was afoot. (I could hazard a guess but should ask them first if my guess would be correct) Yet, this bill is legislating for a new federation and new Federal-State system and includes an open cheque to further amendments. WHAT A BILL.
And I am also astounded that so few submissions have been received. Perhaps since God in whom I trust alerted me, wouldn’t it be wonderful if by his mercy and grace God stopped this bill again. You know our real Commoñwealth Constitution, that’s being trampled into oblivion, comes with the trust of the people in Almighty God. God is almighty, and yet he cares for all people. This bill is not taking God by surprise – faith declares, with him, nothing is impossible. Amen ( means yea, yea let it be so)
People don’t even know what commenter Alison’s bill is, or understand creeping Globalism, and how we are betrayed by these red-blue-green-teal representatives. She implies they are too dumb &/or lazy to even read &/or reply to her letters.
As we are collectively also too dumb &/or lazy we will have to suffer the consequences. By next election will be too late, we will be in the thick of SEERS 2025-28. The hysteria will be turned up and the sheeple will vote for “a safe pair of hands” whatever that may be at the time.
It’s there for everyone to send. Ed
As the USA was hijacked starting 1812, it seems likely to me that Australia was hijacked 1901. The story goes that QV1 was sick on the day and did not sign. All the fine words mean nothing legally without the signature. QV1 died a few weeks later, and weeks or months travel by sea. Perhaps the constitution was “pending” up to the date of “INC.” and now we are legally elsewhere. The law of course initiates the funding, of military and everything else.
What’s also interesting is that NZ was supposedly invited to join the Federation but as we know it already had some other constitutional arrangements, founded on a Treaty. Maybe this was a problem, and the actual reason they declined. Maybe the Maories would have blown the whole thing wide open.
advaustralia said – “… the courts are sitting in TREASON…”
Yes, and we’re NEVER going to obtain a solution going through THEIR fake corporate structures, because they’re our ADVERSARIES.
Some very relevant noise coming out of Canada right about now, having DIRECT RELEVANCE to our predicament here in Australia…
.com/2024/03/total-despotism-christopher-james/
(stick “sgtreport” at the front, and start at around 7:30 into the video)
Common Law and People’s Courts are clearly desirable outcomes, but IMO GETTING THERE is the biggest hurdle facing us, because we have the INSTITUTIONALISED INERTIA of millions of clueless Australians and literal PRIVATE ARMIES of HIRED MERCENARY CORPORATE ENFORCERS standing in our way in every Australian state and territory.
More reasons to pile on and support Commo John’s proposed National Strike to clear a path through the BS Globalist corporate TYRANNY, put all these sold-out baby-eating MONGREL BASTARDS in their place and recover our SOVEREIGNTY.
A bill currently awaiting enactment and forwarded onto a Senate Inquiry Committee is the COAG Legislation Amendmeñt Bill 2023 [Provisions]. This bill was first brought before the last parliament bý the Morrison government in 2021 and it didn’t pass.
The Bill proposes to substitute the words “First Ministers’ Council ” for COAG. The Albanese government wants to keep evolving the Lib/Lab reform agenda for a new federalism into the future. The Bill proposes to change COAG Reform Fund to Federation Reform Fund. Principally, references to COAG are to be renamed Federation.
The Bill would amend also the following Acts: Federal Financial Relations Act, Fuel Indexation Road Funding Special Àccount, DisabilityCare Australia Fund, Disaster Ready Fund, Future Drought Fund, Medical Research Future Fund, Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage, Proceeds of Crime, and Housing Australia Future Fund
The proposed First Ministers’ Council (of PM, Premiers, CMs) will comprise First Ministers such as the National Cabinet, and other representatives such as ALGA.
This is treachery against the Commonwealth Constitution 1901 as it recognises no third tier of government (eg: Local Government) after the 1988 referendum.
These proposals seek to further eradicate by law any form of outward resemblance to the 1901 Federation. Our 1901 Çommonweath Constitution died in 1973 when the Queen of Australia was enacted, and since then successive governments have further corrupted our system of government to a Corporatised Australian system of government, Politicians established a business entity called the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA which is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for global business purposes. The registration number is 0000805157. [Credit: Alan Manson, Submission-Traditional Rights and Freedoms-Encroachments by Commonwealth Laws (ALŔC Interim Report 127)]
It’s 50 years since this act of treason.
And right now there are Senators in a Committee of Inquiry considering this COAG Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 and its Provisions which will throw Australians further into technocratic over-rule by scientific so-called experts, private corporations and foreign global powers.
Are we content to throw care to the wind when this new architecture (the art and technique of designing and drawing up a plan and building structures) for federal-state relations is afoot in The Parliament?
I would advise others who are concerned to contact their representatives and protest.
It certainly is pointing the way to a Republic, which Australians rejected in a 1999 referendum.
I had written letters of concern to all my Senators, and to my H of R MP oñ the 14th and 6th November 2023 respectively, and I received not one reply from any of them regarding this new federation structure, these Ministerial Councils and the National Cabinet.
Thankfully, my letter written to the PM on the 14th November was replied to by the PM’s Department on 8 January 2024, but the Department’s letter did not inform me that the COAG Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 [Provisions] was already introduced into the H of R on 29 November 2023 and was before The Parliament.
There have been only 3 submissions so far to the Committee of Inquiry published online for this bill. This is a tragedy. Perhaps if people read the bill and contacted their representatives it may fail to pass again.
Humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God.
tonyryan43 said – “… we can arrest the entire Parliament and install an interim administration, which is perfectly legal, and thenceforth create all legislation through referenda.”
True enough, when we consider the technical legalities of the situation.
Meanwhile, we have the teensy weensy issue of HUGE PRIVATE ARMIES of shit-for-brains mentally retarded HIRED MERCENARY GANGSTERS entrenched across every Australian state and territory to VIOLENTLY ENFORCE the BELLIGERENT OCCUPATION of our country by the foreign-owned COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION.
So we really need some way to BRIDGE the gap between what we technically can LEGALLY do, and what we can accomplish in REAL LIFE in the face of FOREIGN-OWNED ARMIES of HOSTILE MILITARISED MERCENARY FORCES impersonating “police” and sold-out foreign-owned corporate baby-eating PAEDOPHILES masquerading as our “judiciary” and as our “government”.
… and Paul said – “We know we know we know & here is remedy…”
Paul GETS it.
… and from Alison on another forum thread…
.com/@BrigalowBill:e/CMJ-Interview-with-John-Wilson-March-5,-2024:7
(stick “odysee” at the front)
That is a bit like threatening a burglar with the scabbard of your sword. The actuaL aword is High Court Chief Justice Harry Gibbs’s determination that Australia’s government is unlawful. Using this weapon, we can arrest the entire Parliament and install an interim administration, which is perfectly legal, and thenceforth create all legislation through referenda.
This would resolve every one of Australia’s critical issues, including the WEF/NWO, national sovereignty, racist legislation and services, and abuse of human rights.
Well written.
This is titled as DRAFT Letter>> was a final letter actually sent… otherwise….
Their symbolism will be their downfall 🔺🔻🪬
We know we know we know & here is remedy
http://www.nationalstrike.org
Get onit when you can people & share 🙏🏼🌞
This article not only points out that the courts are sitting in TREASON, but it also shows that electing political party members who are bound first and foremost to vote according to party lines cannot ever give us good government. Constitution Sections 7 and 24 specifically deny political parties any place in our Parliament. Both sections mandate that ONLY we the people have the power and authority to choose our representatives. Political parties do not represent the views of all Australians. In fact, most of them are dangerous to our nation and our democracy, because they are bought and paid for by big business and special interests with money. That’s not the type of government We the People want.
We want government that is composed of ordinary people who step up to give their time and energy to creating and maintaining good government that benefits the community. We want representatives who are not bound by party policy, who will make decisions based on the needs and will of the people. Our 5-Point Plan will achieve this. Please take the time to read it and then decide what you are willing to do to create a better future for our nation and our children.
https://advance-australia.com.au/
[…] Pages: 12 […]
[…] Pages: 12 […]
[…] Pages: 12 […]