A FEDERAL Court judge who threw out an injunction to prevent Pfizer and Moderna from distributing their mRNA Covid vaccines, is the subject of a legal complaint alleging she failed to reveal her links to the pharmaceutical industry.
Law firm PJ O’Brien & Associates is calling on the Federal Parliament to investigate Justice Helen Rofe’s conduct, as is their prerogative under Section 72(2) of the Constitution.
The last time a Parliamentary investigation into potential misbehaviour of a judge was established under Section 72(2) of the Constitution was in the case of Justice Lionel Murphy, in May 1986. The investigation was discontinued when Justice Murphy announced that he had received a terminal cancer diagnosis. Justice Murphy passed away in October 1986.
The complaint against Justice Rofe on behalf of Dr Julian Fidge, alleges serious misconduct possibly rising to misbehaviour by the failure to disqualify herself or disclose her significant prior relationship with Pfizer.
Dr Fidge’s injunction had alleged that the vaccines contain unlicenced genetically modified organisms (GMOs), which is a criminal offence in Australia under the Gene Technology Act 2000. However on March 1 Justice Rofe dismissed the case on the matter of standing, saying it could not succeed.
A media statement from PJ O’Brien & Associates said if the action were successful, it would carry serious financial and reputational damage to both Pfizer and Moderna and as respondents, Pfizer and Moderna stood to benefit from Justice Rofe’s dismissal of the case.
“The complaint against Justice Rofe alleges serious misconduct possibly rising to misbehaviour by the failure to disqualify herself or disclose her significant prior relationship with Pfizer,” the law firm said.
“Justice Rofe was appointed to the Federal Court on 12 July 2021 after being called to the Bar in 2001. When at the Bar, Justice Rofe directly and indirectly represented Pfizer on at least five occasions between the years 2003-2006.
“Additionally, Justice Rofe has substantial affiliations and associations with the pharmaceutical and scientific research industry. Her Honour’s extended family established the Grimwade family pharmaceutical fortune and later ran leading Australian biomedical research organisation the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI).
“The WEHI has received funding of hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars and over US$30 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.”
The complaint also notes that professionally, Justice Rofe sat on the Bolton Clarke Human Research and Ethics Committee for 10 years and Bolton Clark received significant grant money from the judge’s cousin, the late Sir Andrew Grimwade CBE, in his role as chairman of the Felton Bequests Committee. Sir Andrew was honorary president of the WEHI for 14 years, serving on the board from 1963 to 1992.
“In view of these allegations, PJ O’Brien & Associates is calling on the Upper and Lower Houses of Parliament to investigate Justice Rofe’s conduct, as is their prerogative under Section 72(2) of the Constitution,” the law firm partners said.
Katie Ashby-Koppens, instructing solicitor with the law firm, said judges were duty bound to disclose not only potential conflicts, but also perceived conflicts. “Failing to disclose this information is not just a breach of common courtesy, but is a breach of the judicial obligations of a sitting judge,” she said.
“There are 17 judges who sit on the Federal Court Melbourne Registry. Justice Rofe was not the only judge available to hear the matter. Justice Rofe’s dismissal of our case should be voided and our matter should be heard by a judge with no presenting conflicts, as should all matters in the Australian judicial system.
“We have asked Chief Justice Mortimer to investigate our complaint. Additionally, we call on the Parliament of Australia to investigate allegations of misbehaviour of a sitting judge. If the allegations of misbehaviour are proven, the Parliament may remove Justice Rofe from the bench.”
A comment from GumshoeNews is most apropos of this subject:
Terry Shulze April 4, 2024 at 1:50 pm
Oh great, they are taking the ‘medical profession’ and the ‘political profession’ to court in the ‘legal profession’ – good luck with that.
Perhaps the populace needs to see the incredible fraud that Australian culture has devolved into. Although, the majority of the population will rely upon the ‘media profession’ to keep them well informed.
Protect yourself, nobody else will.
Pat we all know, you are becoming a bit rhetorical. You clearly support Dr Fidge, as I said yesterday you have the knowledge do you not? You in the locality support him.
Betty Mac yes I was being sarcastic re Dr Fidge. I did research. Apologies. I was also the one who did research on the Dishonourable Justice Rofe and her relatives and posted it here and as per Tony Ryan’s suggestion I forwarded to the good Doctor as I guess others here did too and potentially other sources.. Last chance I say. Anyone in Vic spread far and wide as he will either meet his demise, or they maybe they may throw her justice under the bus??? I not sure. Either way Victorians need to support him. Is there a politician supporting this man? I personally haven’t found one yet. Have any of you?
Hey folks, I know this might seem a little off-topic, but it’s NOT, it’s actually squarely ON TOPIC when you understand the over-arching BIG PICTURE of what’s going on, INCLUDING with these BS fake “vaccine” BIOWEAPONS…
.com/world-news/climate/the-progress-on-national-ev-charging-stations/
(stick “armstrongeconomics” at the front)
ABSOLUTELY KEY quote from that article – “The government utterly ignores its constituents…”
Does that sound familiar, folks?
LOCKSTEP, folks, that’s the name of the game.
As long as we continue to play THEIR game by THEIR rules in THEIR foreign-owned CORPORATE SANDPIT, then we continue to EMPOWER THEM to do WHATEVER THEY WANT to our country, our people and our children.
SILENCE is CONSENT.
COMPLIANCE is CONSENT.
Seeking THEIR OPINION is CONSENT.
Asking for THEIR PERMISSION is CONSENT.
Pleading for THEIR ASSISTANCE is CONSENT.
Accepting THEIR DECISIONS is CONSENT.
And trying to NEGOTIATE WITH THEM is CONSENT.
It’s not rocket science, in fact it’s hidden there in plain sight right under our noses.
Seriously.
Trick question, folks…
When a Mac Truck loaded with foreign baby-eating psychopaths smashes into your house and comes to rest in your living room, what do you do?
Spend all your time trying to repair the truck and give it a new paint job?
Seriously.
There is really only one solution to all this: The military, and this means a world wide military alliance, which currently exists, must come into Australia, which it is very close to actioning, dismantle the government and judicial institutions, put in place an interim military government and ask the people of Australia to write a new constitution and form a new government.
The existing institutions which heavily influence our lives are so totally corrupt that they are beyond reform.
The only restraint on this event is the lack of awareness of the majority of the population that would view such an event as a military invasion and likely side with the current government. (Stockholm syndrome)
I believe the proposed “End the Belligerent Occupation Strike” by “Commo John Wilson” is an effort to awaken the people and give the awaiting world military alliance, confidence that the people of Australia are in support of them to the extent that will allow the peaceful transfer of power without violence.
To tony james: I wrote to Cairns News about this problem the other day – and it’s still happening. I’ve found a way around it. When you first click the article a donation box will come up and it’s this that prevents you going any further. Click the X on the right hand side of it and close it down then close Cairns News. Go back to your email and click the article again – and you will get the scroll bar. A right pain to be sure!
obvious_bob said – “… all hearing s to be be jury, only.”
… which means that FIRST we’ll have to see the CURRENT occupants of the so-called “court houses” thrown out, because there’s NOW WAY they’ll allow the useless eaters to encroach upon their foreign-owned CORPORATE TURF.
And even less chance that having the foreign-owned COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION “investigate” them will lead to any useful outcome.
And yet we just keep banging our heads against the wall playing by THEIR rules in THEIR rotten insidious CORPORATE game inside THEIR wholly-owned corporate skating rink.
Sorry, folks, I just can’t help the overwhelming sense that we’re trapped in circular logic here, while the ACTUAL situation is operating entirely OUTSIDE of that circle and the villains are laughing at us as we thresh about.
Or maybe like a cat chasing the laser spot. If ONLY she could CATCH the damn thing.
To Betty mac: Can crowd funding be set up to help him with court costs if this is the doctor you know? And protection of his home, family and practice?
How can it be that the judge concerned was able to dismiss the case – against her??? That’s a MAJOR conflict of interest! If I robbed a bank and was a judge and it came before me, I WOULD dismiss it too!! I wouldn’t want to give all the ill-gained money back – and also lose the money from the work as a judge (and ALL it’s benefits!)! Thank heavens I am not of that ilk and character. But please, someone explain to me how that could have arisen.
Reply to Bliskett…If this Dr Fidge is the same Dr Fidge who lived in the Wodonga area, and I think was on Wodonga or Wangaratta Council several years ago…he is real
The main understanding of what I have read here is that DR FIDGE NEEDS TO BE PROTECTED.Those in power today fight dirty….. very, very dirty.The
results from a new Court case could bring down several big names.I admire Dr Fidge, he is a very brave man.
Lets not forget Judge Yeldham. Apart from him necking himself over his pedophile behavior it was more to do with corruption around Healthcare, Special branches of police and Government bureaucrats. It does present itself again in the way of Judge Rofe.
https://www.bmartin.cc/dissent/documents/health/yeldham.html
Exactly Tony, if a larger percentage of people condemn ones actions then they themselves will know we’re the boundaries are set. Corruption in general has to be bought to the front and condemned by all good people. And as you say when a few of them are thrown under the bus, it will put the fear of god in the rest of them. We have had enough.
Starting to notice some change on MSM in particular this morning on nine news against Bibi and the bombing of the humanitarian workers. Might even see ABC and Nine showing masses of Israeli’s protesting on the streets in Tel Aviv against their own president soon.
Most of us know the entire judicial system is corrupt, but we need to take into account human nature. Most citizens are not aware that the vast majority of perpetrators need to justify their actions, even in obscure ways.
In like manner, the politicians and legal fraternity need to be able to deny the corruption because this is their moral backstop; the capacity to say “The legal system is what holds civilistion together”. Thus, if we all loudly back Dr Fidge by inserting his action into every comment we make in the mainstream media and radio talk-back, the Establishment will be forced to proceed as required under the Constitution. It is obvious already that Rofe is guilty as hell, and so a multilateral tri-partisan committee will meet and it will be agreed to throw her under the bus and then damage control will be discussed.
There is no way Pfizer will wear this and so Fidge must be protected by Australians, and there must be the clear albeit covert understanding that Pfizer gets it in the neck if anything happens to the good doctor.
This is how the real world works. If we fold our arms and wait for events to unfold of their own accord, Rofe will be cleared and/or Fidge will fail to survive.
As I see it, this is probably our last chance to force the system back on track.
same here Tony, I press the ‘Reload this page’ icon top left of screen.
When I try to read this article (or others on this site), the page won’t scroll down. The only way to get it to scroll down is to go to another tab such as “contacts”, then once there go back to the article and then I can scroll down. Is anyone else having similar problems of late? (only happened in the past week or thereabouts).
I want to provide link to this story on a social media site, but I don’t want anyone to have the same problem……
The simple way out f that, Pat & Co., is for all hearing s to be be jury, only. That way no conflicted Judge (no man or woman can judge another) can make a conflicted judgement.
Members of the BAR, a legal heavy-lift heist outfit, could do us all a favour and take a long, well-paid walk off a short Admiralty Law plank.
Dr Fidges legal team have done a good job of exposing the BAR criminalty, so thanks for those efforts.
I’m reminded of the time Qantas was to be sold to buyers in the US but wouldn’t you know, someone forgot about a line on a map, the International Dateline. The deal fell over because the monies were sent a day late – another case of the best laid schemes of mice and men. Someone always forgets something, what will a member of the BAR cabal forget that leads to their demise?
“If Dr Fidge has no standing then no one under any conceivable set of circumstances will have standing.”
Exactly right… “Cattle have no standing at all. Their sole purpose is to benefit their God chosen masters.”
We of course don’t believe such nonsense but we certainly accept it. Good on us!
Our minders mind our minds and we mind our own business. Our bodies will inevitably follow.
In case some still haven’t noticed, our arses have no standing on today’s Eugene-icist owned cattle market.
Pat i going to call you on this one, if you are from VIC, go and support Dr Fidge (if he is even real) with every bit of ammunition you have. You always are so confident with what you say, and know, here is your chance so go and back Dr Fidge with everything you have. Everyone from Victoria should. A jury? Or are you like all the rest of Australians so broke we can’t drive 100kms, to do this stuff. If so we are screwed.
To make our justice system great again, we have “need for a powerful and independent anti – corruption commission.”
Will the annals read, “Mark Dreyfus born….died…., is regarded as the most honourable Attorney General to represent the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia in its 400 years history.”
Or on the head of a goat named Rofe, will the sins of the judiciary be dumped, before it is unceremoniously sent into the legal wilderness?
A legal firm using the Constitution to undo a corrupt Federal court judge and relying on a “Parliament of Australia” to enforce section 72(2) ha good luck with that. That gargoyle(Gillard) of a Prime Minister a few years ago suppressed section 72 by appointing a commission to oversee judicial misbehaviour. WAKE UP AUSSIE
This matter must proceed and this judge must be struck off as she should never have heard the case to start with. She was not impartial and had bias.
Good luck Dr Fidge – and watch your back.
Watch this space. Dr Fidge should keep Cairns News updated.
The conduct of this matter proves once again what a deeply corrupt entity is the Justice system. It does not even bother with a fig leaf of legal fiction or some ‘colour of law’ pretensions. No it just takes the lid off the rot.
A Justice who had formerly acted for Pfizer in legal matters did not recuse herself. So even before the opening statements we know that we are before a Committee of Public Safety.
And then she finds that Dr. Fidge has no standing as an aggreived person.
This can not be accepted. If Dr Fidge has no standing then no one under any conceivable set of circumstances will have standing.
This entire meshuggeneh has been conducted to demoralise a population that is being subjected to a democide by a Communist Takeover.
No! Dr Fidge’s matter must press on. As St Joan said: “Forward. They are ours!!’ (Sounds better in French.
you must know that the u s dod ordered everything…. dear good God please help us all return / turn to goodness truth love compassion for all and guide us all as to how deal with all of this
You want the foreign-owned COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION to investigate the malfeasance and corruption of the foreign-owned COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION?
Good luck with that.
Why oh why do we INSIST on playing THEIR games by THEIR rules inside THEIR rotten-to-the-core sports arena?