Here is the footage of Victoria Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton in 2021 admitting that MPs and the judiciary are exempt from the Covid vax mandates.
If you watch closely you will see somebody desperately trying to get him off stage when he says it.
Not long afterward he disappeared from press conferences for quite a while.
Let’s hope the Covid Royal Commission will include this little gem that Victorian health authorities would like to bury. (supplied)
AusExitsWHO – AEW joins USA, Canada, and UK, in a Worldwide.ExitTheWHO campaign. See jamesroguski.substack.com/p/worldwide-exit-the-who
On their website AusExitsWHO is raising the level of awareness to Australia at risk of losing its sovereignty to the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) due to proposed changes to the World Health Assembly’s (WHA’s) International Health Regulations (IHR), and all this even if Australia votes against the proposals.
Remember the petition to reject the 2022 amendments from 5 months ago that generated 55,697 signatures from concerned Australians?
Petition Link: http://www.aph.gov.au/e-petitions/petition/EN5048
AusExitsWHO wrote to Minister for Health and Aged Care, Mark Butler, and stated his response “is dismissive in nature and is neither current nor accurate”. Given the potential dire and horrifying ramifications of these proposed amendments, it is time for Australians to take a stand and let our MPs know that they need to represent “We, the people” with our disapproval of them.
See the letter and response at: australiaexitsthewho.com
The Timeline – The 77th World Health Assembly, during which the IHR amendments and the pandemic treaty are to be voted on, is scheduled to begin May 27, 2024. The IHR amendments will only require a 50% vote of whomever is in the room at the time of the vote.
However, the IHR amendments working group must submit their final package of amendments by January 27, 2024.
Minister Mark Butler said Australia is actively participating in the Working Group.
This means we only have two weeks left to raise enough awareness about these amendments to prevent their adoption.
The Good News – While the situation may appear bleak, American podcaster and former professor of evolutionary biology Bret Weinstein remains optimistic, if for no other reason than the fact that we, the opposition to this global coup, actually have the most courageous intellectuals on OUR team. That said, to truly prevent this global coup, we need you, everyone, regular folk everywhere, to speak and share the truth to the point that you’re able. For only then will our voices outnumber the voices of the propaganda machine.
Credit: Dr Mercola article, Understanding the WHO’s Plans for You
Editor, cairnsnews — Glenfiddich might help. Ed
Very Good choice, very tempted, but gave up the good stuff some years back.
I know, never trust a non drinker.
I just gave it up, never swore off it.
They lied through their teeth and bullied and terrified everyone into taking a deadly witches brew that’s injured and killed thousands of people whilst deceptively protecting themselves with the very constitution that was supposed to protect us from them.
They deceptively pretended to take the vax in very public photo ops whilst knowing that it was entirely fake to further deceive the public into accepting it.
Now thousands are sick, injured and dead.
The only conclusion that I can come to based on this evidence is that our PTB are trying to kill us all and save their own @rses.
Does this explain the insane immigration even though there’s no housing for them?
Are they expecting us all to die so they can give these immigrants our homes?
Is this population replacement?
Are Australians just going to sit back and let that happen?
Whats going to happen next?
Stay tuned next week!
Same Bat Lady time,
Same Bat Lady channel.
A naughty policeman told us back then 196 senior Qld Police officers were exempted from the deadly jab. Their minions were not so lucky. Ed
Glenfiddich might help. Ed
Pat from Vic — ” Off topic – just a thought, a daily eye bath with Ceyenne Pepper tea”
Thanks Pat, I will look further into that info.
Pat from Vic — “It’s all traceable back to the Law of “Because They Can”.
Every word in all of your comment is 100% true, correct, bang on, well said.
We let them pee all over us, and we zombie like continue to let them pee all over us. And we know what they are doing, they tell us in detail.
Really we should respect them for being so good at using our apathy and stupidity to control us like sheep and cattle.
They put in the effort, they get the rewards. One of the rewards that keeps being given is, they often get to have a good old laugh at our compliane to their tyranny, mandates and narratives.
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Here is the video link
https://videopress.com/embed/swG504y0
Did you know that Dr Mengele was actually a Dentist and his Chief of medical staff was most probably an Ashkenazi Jew ?
A disgusting revelation. So they knew all along these injections were dangerous but ok for everyone but them. Unforgiveable!
“I for one would love to know precisely what that legal advise was that absolved them from the tyranny of Nuremberg Code-breaching experiments.”
One can only surmise that the advice was that it was unconstitutional and that it would be very risky to force it on those who could cause them embarrassment, punishment and reparations.
In other words, only apply the mandates to those who could be relied on NOT to have the power to blow the lid off and expose the unconstitutionality and the egregious evil of their actions… the common folk who have no power to kick off a Nuremburg 2 and endanger the fate of the modern day Mengele freaks.
Jon said – “I for one would love to know precisely what that legal advise was that absolved them from the tyranny of Nuremberg Code-breaching experiments.”
It’s all traceable back to the Law of “Because They Can”.
The COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION owns the fake “parliaments” in every Australian state and territory, it owns the fake “judiciary”, and it owns all the private armies of hired mercenary gangsters impersonating our “police” who ENFORCE CORPORATE POLICY. All of these institutions AND ALL THE REST have been HIJACKED and TOTALLY REPLACED by their CORPORATE AVATARS.
They all operate on the CORPORATE POLICIES determined by their foreign shareholders, and ignore the Australian 1901 Constitution which has no relevance to their corporate operations because there is ABSOLUTELY NO-ONE IN AUSTRALIA with both the motivation and the MEANS to hold them accountable to it.
So the operative question really becomes – who is going to STOP them, especially when the bulk of Australians are so willing to COMPLY with their every CORPORATE POLICY masquerading as LAW?
They make up all this shit as they go along, and as far as they’re concerned, there’s not a DAMN THING we can do about it.
I couldn’t stand one millisecond of watching Victorian politicians or bureaucrats during the COVID tyranny so I actually missed that press conference where Brett said that the judiciary and politicians were exempt.
Apart from Sherri’s excellent intimation that the aforementioned cohort must have some medical anomaly compared to we serfs and peasants, I for one would love to know precisely what that legal advise was that absolved them from the tyranny of Nuremberg Code-breaching experiments.
Ron said – “We no longer have many years to “wait.” ”
Eight years, according to Martin Armstrong – if we can survive that long.
It’s unfortunately looking like we’ll have to teeter on the precipice before people finally start kicking arse and chewing bubble gum.
ron said – “…vision problem.”
Off topic – just a thought, a daily eye bath with Ceyenne Pepper tea is reputed to have miraculous restorative powers. Counter-intuitive, perhaps, but well established over centuries, and well within the reach of ordinary mortals.
And that’s not even an April Fool’s joke. Much info online re Dr. Christopher’s marvellous work in herbal medicine, including this.
Just be sure to used pure water and clean uncontaminated herbs for any such purpose. The less direct route (logically) is to just eat lots of Chilis.
Covid Schmovid, “Chief Health Officer” Brett Sutton, brother-in-law to Jane Halton the local attendee of Gates Event 201 for Covid organisers in late 2019, is now hiding out at the CSIRO possibly getting us primed for SEERS 2025-8, he has proved he will sell everyone out, why would he not do it again
https://gumshoenews.com/forced-injections-keeping-you-safe/#comment-167302
Sorry about my spelling mistakes, I will take a break until I sort out this injury caused vision problem.
Claude Ramains, said: “I would say that this has been done on purpose to dumb down generations of the Australian people to make them ignorant of govt abuses and vulnerable to having their rights attacked for such a time as this.”
Absolutely, 100% correct.
I have spoken with a person who has a relative doing a Uni course in law.
That person said that they have learnt nothing about the 1901 Constitution
at Uni.
I learnt nothing about it during a Uni post grad justice studies course.
Try bringing up the matter in any of the corporate courts – they are all now corporate owned, there is no longer any Common Law in their (not ours) courts.
The 1901 original Constitution is still there but is ignored / hidden away from the people it was put in place to serve and protect.
Can a majority of the Australian people
put it back in use? I believe they can and in a short period of time, and put back Common Law into our (not theirs) Common Law Courts.
For the want of knowledge my people perish – something like that.
The majority know bugger all about the three levels of governments being corporations that answer directly to overseas masters and UNWEF, WHO, etc,
How to fix it (probably nearly too late already) guns, knives, sticks, stones, NO. none of that. ” Information” the realities, the truths, real history in place of the hidden history.
Means:
Main Stream Media – NO.
Alternate Media, Yes. certainly for the awake minority.
Peoples Community Centers, YES.
Community centers / forums in every community across all of Australia.
With common causes to get rid of all of the tyrants systems and their minions and lackeys, but keep those who remained loyal to the people.
Anything else is, in my opinion a waste of time and effort.
Protests are good, they are temporary communities when in operation. Anything that is community or gets information”directly” to people in the communities.
Will that happen?
Likely not, people seem to want something more technical or a white knight, a demigod, or others to do the work.
And are prepared to keep waiting for many years to be saved from their own apathy and stupidity.
We no longer have many years to “wait.”
So, it seems there is an invisible barrier that protects politicians from getting covid so they don’t have to be force vaxxed like the non politicians?
So, there seems to be an invisible barrier that protects politicians from covid and thus exempts them from being forced vaxxed with a vaccine that is deadly to non politicians?
Claude, we have a Constitution which I view is second to none, but we lack credible politicians (except some are seeking to do their best), judges and police forces to uphold their oaths/affirmation of office. The High Court of Australia already way back ibn 1904 started its treasonous conduct to deny the usage of the Hansard Constitution Convention Debates this even so the Framers of the Constitution stated:
Hansard 2-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the observations to which I allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of misconception.
END QUOTE
and
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
END QUOTE
And
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to commit to the people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to commit this new Magna Charta for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole history of the peoples of the world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of Australia to vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This new charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
END QUOTE
In 1988 the High Court of Australia then allowed the Hansard records but never then corrected past incorrect judgments. And I am now exposing the wrong decisions, such as Sue v Hill, MABO, Sykes v Cleary and a lot more. And obviously they now are targeting me for doing this.
Ron, thanks for your comment. On 19 July 2006 in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I (representing myself) defeated the Commonwealth and 9 Attorney-Generals that the “compulsory” part of voting is unconstitutional. I do vote at times but often not, as such I am not against voting just again “compulsory” part of it. My blog has a copy of the court order. Because they are well aware of my research in constitutional matters, they now try to use the council for political persecution and I made clear I will not abort my goal to hold all politicians, and their collaborators legally accountable.
Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be.
END QUOTE
Hence, there can be no such thing as a “QUALIFIED IMMUNITY”! They all can be held legally accountable!
Too many innocent victims are going to suffer for the rest of their lives and too many already died and will die and we need to ensure we can prevent a similar event that the evil doers already are planning.
Ron said:
“ To be fair on those who had input into, and drafting of the original 1900/1901 Constitution.
They likely would not have envisioned that there could/would ever be so many traitors in so many (one after another) traitorous governments, over so many decades.”
I agree with him but want to add that when I was a child we were taught the constitution in school. We were probably taught it way to young for us to fully grasp what it meant but at least we got taught it.
By the time the 70s came around it was removed from the curriculum. People now in their 50s and younger never got taught it.
If they were things would probably be very different.
I would say that this has been done on purpose to dumb down generations of the Australian people to make them ignorant of govt abuses and vulnerable to having their rights attacked for such a time as this.
Claude Ramains, said: ” Remember that the Constitution was enshrined as the ultimate law of the land to put limits on the government and protect the people from their tendency to tyranny and overreach.”
To be fair on those who had input into, and drafting of the original 1900/1901 Constitution.
They likely would not have envisioned that there could/would ever be so many traitors in so many (one after another) traitorous governments, over so many decades.
Or that the type of governments that they mentioned in the Constitution would/could be 100% replaced by overseas owned and run corporations.
Or that most Australians would end up being cowardly, apathetic, self important, fully brainwashed and indoctrinated supporters of pretender corporation governments.
Or that Australians would fully support (knowingly or unknowingly) their own demise, by voting into power and making legitimate, the pretender corporation governments.
At the time of the drafting of the original Constitution, those who had input likely knew that the vast majority of Australians were courageous, brave, hard working, honest, and they loved Australia, and would fight to keep it free of tyrants and treacherous parasites.
So other than the decades of treacherous governments and the UNWEF and other parasites.
Who else should wear the blame for letting it all happen, and still be going along with and supporting the traitors?
That would be the vast majority of Australians who over many decades, and especially now, let it happen and still let it happen.
We have been suffering and will continue to suffer, for our cowardice and apathy.
And for not protecting ourselves and families and friends against the tyrants, traitors, minions and lackeys, who freely continue to harm, murder and enslave us.
If those who had input into the drafting of the Constitution were still here, they would likely hang their heads in shame, not because of their actions, but because of our cowardly inaction’s.
Is it time to just let nature run its course, getting rid of those who will not push back in the interest of their own survival?
Do we deserve what the traitors have done and will continue to do to
us?
To those in the minority, who put themselves at risk by pushing back, thanks for all of your time and effort.
Covid jabs gives a whole new meaning to the concept of producing ‘antibodies’..ie. anti-body literally!
Has to be said, folks, yet again…
These treasonous mass-murdering arseholes do whatever the Hell they want because they ARE NOT our “government”.
OF COURSE they exempt THEMSELVES from a genocidal bioweapon marketed as a “vaccine” which was rammed down the Australian people’s throats AGAINST THEIR WILL, under force of arms by the OCCUPYING ARMIES of hired gangster assassins and abetted by that paedophile club masquerading as the Australian “judiciary”.
What self-respecting employees of the foreign-owned COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION would NOT protect THEMSELVES in this way from the corporate policy to EXTERMINATE the Australian people? That’s just common sense, good “business” in the lexicon of organised crime.
The FARMER isn’t going to get up on the abbatoir ramp and march right on in to be slaughtered with the sheep and cattle, is he? How would Scotty from Marketing be able to enjoy the fabulous lifestyle afforded by his $52 MILLION payoff if he was so absent-minded as to line up for a genocidal bioweapon injection?
All these little revelations – which should NOT be “revelations” to anyone with eyes to see – of our self-appointed corporate “elites” IMMUNITY to the MISERY they INTENTIONALLY inflict on the Australian people, are just jigsaw puzzle pieces that coalesce into the BIG PICTURE, folks.
If you’re not already seeing the BIG PICTURE, maybe go see a decent optometrist, or perhaps OPEN YOUR FRIGGING EYES.
Here’s someone who knows…
.com/video/QKbK6j1fho3D/ (stick “bitchute” at the front)
Yes, folks, the AUSTRALIAN PEOPLE are sovereign.
Not that our Constitution is much help when we’ve STUPIDLY permitted the OCCUPATION of our country by foreign-owned CORPORATE ARMIES of hired mercenary gangsters all too willing and capable to put down ANYONE who stands up against the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION. Hell, they even KILL THEIR OWN whenever their Globalist-owned management feels the need.
And just BTW, the Army is no help EITHER seeing as how the command structure all the way up to the Governor General is INFESTED with compromised traitorous Freemason QUISLINGS beholden to their FOREIGN GLOBALIST MASTERS.
Word on the street is that the Governor General has been PINNED TO THE WALL with lewd video recordings of him PORKING someone of high status who IS NOT HIS WIFE. Of course, these are just UNSUBSTANTIATED SECOND HAND RUMOURS – if you like, “it’s what I heard”. Perhaps ASIO, bless their black hearts, can shed some light on the matter, seeing as how they’ve got their tendrils in everyone’s business this side of Pluto (but of course, they won’t, because they are just as sold-out and treasonous as any other subsidiary of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CORPORATION).
Just saying.
Queensland Premier Palaszczuk let it slip on 22 Nov 2021 that Qld police inspectors would be exempted from the jab while on 12 Dec 21 the State Parliament Speaker Curtis Pitt said Members of the legislative assembly will also be exempt.
I enjoyed “outing” the odd inspector at rallies in front of their shocked subordinates and there was nothing they could do about it. So funny!
What did we all think they meant when they said they wanted to depopulate the planet.
That it was going to happen over there and not here?
So now we know that what they mean by the phrase “sustainable development”.
It means that they want to sustain THEIR development – not ours.
And to do that they have to have net zero carbon emissions.
They just didn’t tell us that we are the carbon that they want to net zero.
Really makes you realise why all court challenges to the vax mandates have failed doesn’t it.
The govts got the judiciary on the hook.
Those “Consitutional protections” that our government afforded themselves, and the court staff (ie judges, lawyers etc etc)
Are found in section 51 of the Australian constitution that spells out the parliamentary powers which include….
“pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (BUT NOT SO AS TO AUTHORISE ANY FORM OF CIVIL CONSCRIPTION), benefits to students and family allowances”
That means that parliament is prohibited from mandating any pharmaceutical or medical services!
That includes masks and THE VAX!
It was placed there via referendum when Australians were horrified to discover the medical experimentation that the Nazis did on the Jews in the death camps and vowed “never again”…. Until “again” is forced on us all by a govt that for all practical purposes acted more like Nazi Germany than a free constitutional Monarchy.
Remember that the Constitution was enshrined as the ultimate law of the land to put limits on the government and protect the people from their tendency to tyranny and overreach.
That’s something they turned on its head where they used it to protect themselves and relied on the populations ignorance and fear to perpetrate a crime against them that has left many injured, sick, dying and DEAD.
Suddenly!
May God Almighty be their judge because he’s the only one not on their payroll.
The “mandates” fundamentally impacted the poor folk who did not have the means or power to challenge them.
That’s just PURE EVIL BASTARDRY and ABUSE! And 100 times worse than any mandate affecting everyone.
Preying mostly on the weak and the meek. Cop that, you cattle class Aussies. You no longer count in the human rights stakes. They sure got the “herd effect” they wanted.
Grrrr….. Our New Australia, the unlucky, fkee, country.
Rick, said: ” and she WOULD NOT BE HAVING IT.?
Correction for my previous below mentioned comment:
But, she has to get some credit for saying that her staff would not be mandated (encouraged, or else) to take the jab.
Should read:
But, she has to get some credit “if” she said her staff would not be mandated (encouraged, or else) to take the jab.
So, no I did not see (remember) Pauline say it in Parliament.
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Well done, thanks for your time and effort.
May you have great success, very good outcomes.
At the very least you have put them on notice.
Cheers
Rick, said: ” and she WOULD NOT BE HAVING IT.?
I do remember Pauline saying (on a video) she would not take it, she made a real point of saying that, at a public meeting (from memory) at Ipswich.
As she was already exempted from taking the experimental poison, her refusal to take it was not such a brave thing to say.
But, she has to get some credit for saying that her staff would not be mandated (encouraged, or else) to take the jab.
I am currently in a legal dispute with a council and this includes that I pursue that councils are legally accountable for the harm inflicted upon Victorians/Australians for using their health centre service to permit the usage of the “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION bioweapon jab referred to as ‘covid-19 vaccination’. . My position is that the States/Territories had no constitutional legislative, executive or administrative powers for any of the mandates. Regretfully the video of Brett Sutton cannot be downloaded by me and I need a Bitchute or YouTube link for this, and I would appreciate someone to post such links.
what lying slimy pieces of shite these pollies and bureauCRAPS are..
sack the lot get rid of the rot…
time for rule 303
Did anyone here see Pauline Hanson in Parliament say that she, her family, or her staff would NOT be required to have the poison and she WOULD NOT BE HAVING IT.
‘Constitutional legal reasons that exempt the judiciary and politicians from mandates’ Last time I checked the constitution was applicable to all people equally. Mandates were always illegal and the injections were an experiment.
Settings themselves up to be ‘Sovereigns’ for CSRQ currency.
Common, Sovereign, Restricted, Quarantined.
He said certain groups weren’t mandated, so that is also an admittance that vaccines WERE mandated….a deal being done between govt. and big businesses etc .behind the scenes!
If it saves you, why are you exempting the “most important” people? And doesn’t that show it actually kills you?
Not just MPs and judiciary, but apparently (or so I heard) high ranking police…
If it was ‘safe and effective’ why were they exempt? This alone proves their complicity in the harm of the Australian people.. No doubt governments worldwide did the same thing !
Re: ab
Date: January 14, 2024Author: Editor, cairnsnews 1 Comment
Here is the footage of Victoria Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton in 2021 admitting that MPs and the judiciary are exempt from the Covid vax mandates.
Probably find that that ALL MPs and the judiciary are exempt from the Covid vax mandates, irrespective of which State they are in.
What is a MANDATE? Does anyone remember? I understood a Mandate was an agreement between two parties. Mostly used in trade agreements. Why does Gov refer to their order to the public as a Mandate? More mind bending going on. How many made an agreement with Gov to take the death shots? Seems that if you participated you agreed. That is called (once again) ‘FOOLED YA’. Stop allowing them to fool you and THINK for yourself, instead of following like empty headed sheep. (probably insulting the sheep, they have some sense, sometimes).