THE Five Eyes alliance, backed by the UN and WEF, have launched a desperate bid to intimidate and silence Aussies, Kiwis, Canadians, Americans and Brits who dare question globalist narratives.
The Australia-New Zealand Labor and Green party governments both have so-called “online safety” bills they are about to push through their parliaments after the usual phoney “public consultations” have taken place.
But these governments will have one huge battle on their hands trying to squash the booming alternative media like Cairns News, Australian National Review, Zee Media, Tott News, Independent Australia, Rebel News, TNT Radio and the highly popular New Zealand channels Reality Check Radio, Counterspin Media and The Platform. The list only begins there.
At a state level in Australia, Queensland Labor has launched a full-frontal attack on free speech in a bill to change the Criminal Code Act to criminalize “hate speech” and vilification of minorities. This is being done by Palaszczuk and company moving provisions of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 into the Queensland Criminal Code.
Deregistered GP Bill Bay spoke out against the move at a Gold Coast meeting this week. “For the very first time in history there are now criminal definitions of race and gender and identity and fluidity, all in the Criminal Code, so the Queensland Police can now get involved in your family, in your school and in fact in everything that you do – so welcome to the new tyranny or the new democracy ladies and gentlemen,” he said.
Concurrently the national-level bills are putting up a raft of massive fines in the millions of dollars for social media companies that publish “disinformation” and fail to keep a register of it. The arbiters of “disinformation and misinformation” will be organisations like the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), operating under Albanese’s Combating Misinformation and Disinformation Bill.
The socially conservative Australian Christian Lobby, which represents a wide cross section of Australian Christian denominations, is alarmed by the Bill which it sees as a tool to stop debate over issues such as abortion and gender identity. “The way the government proposes to regulate online platforms is by imposing a code on the digital platforms themselves. It will make them terrified of your content if there is any risk of being caught by this low standard of harm,” said the ACL CEO Michelle Pearse.
Ms Pearse said if the bill was passed online platforms would “play it safe” out of fear of penalty and there would be excessive monitoring of online views (of groups like the ACL) by the watchdog while records of your non-conforming activities would be compiled.
Across the ditch, the new kid PM on the block, Christopher Hipkins and his Labor-Green comrades have their own version of censorship being pushed by the Department of Internal Affairs, also known as Te Tare Taiwhenua – in case you were interested. Listen to the oh so calm, caring and Orwellian spin in this video promoting “safer online services and media platforms”.
Concurrent with this, NZ’s government-sponsored main media channels Stuff.co and Radio New Zealand have been busy pushing out propaganda “exposing” the dangerous conspiracy theory spreaders and haters who are preying on the innocent, gullible public. Stuff Circuit’s “award winning documentary” on this is “Fire and Fury – Who’s driving a violent, misinformed New Zealand, and why.”
The doco begins in dark, sinister colours and sounds with a lone commuter sitting on a train and scrolling through – shock, horror – conspiracy websites and some expat Yank named Damien de Ment ranting on about how bad things are. And then a dull, uninspired narrator from Stuff named Paula Penfold begins to unveil before us just who these sinister people are. She is helped by a few other “experts” in their field including Kate Hannah, another Ardern-funded “femocrat” and director of the government funded Disinformation Project at Auckland University.
Also featured is the Gucci clothes horse Rebecca Kitteridge, the Director-General of the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service, who in 2021 made the startling, shocking and eye-opening observation that “there’s no doubt white identity extremism in New Zealand is on the rise and worldwide”. Perhaps she was referring the the neo-Nazi Azzov Battallion in Ukraine … oh wait, aren’t they on our side? This incredible intelligence gatherer also told MPs that there was also “a proliferation of all sorts of conspiracy theories”!
To their credit the Stuff Circuit team who made Fire and Fury admit that they are losing the battle to assure the public that what mainstream media say is the truest and most reliable information. “What we are about to show you is not an exhaustive list because that list would be too long,” says Penfold of the rising anti-establishment leaders and their groups. “But we want to introduce you to some of the key drivers in New Zealand of false information and dangerous conspiracy.”
It must have been disheartening to the Stuff crowd to discover in March this year that one of their main targets in the documentary, Voices for Freedom, had launched it’s own radio station called Reality Check Radio. Even more galling for them was the fact that RCR featured two big-name defectors from mainstream media – the 40-year Kiwi TV and radio broadcast veteran Peter Williams and Paul Brennan from Radio NZ.
Williams was a noted sports journalist and newsreader for TVNZ while Brennan worked on news for the government-funded RNZ. Another prominent name on the station is Rodney Hide, the former leader of the ACT NZ political party. Before that, Kiwi mainstream media only had to contend with the Infowars-style Counterspin Media, run on a platform provided by a Steve Bannon company and hosted by ex-Army guy Kelvin Alps and another mainstream media defector Liz Gunn.
RNZ is also running a “disinformation expose” on its Undercurrent series, described by their former employee Brennan as “a cracked record, a cracked record, a cracked record”. “Undercurrent shows politicians are feeling the heat,” Brennan told his online political panel on July 21st. Panel contributors Olivia Pierson, Cam Slater and Marty Gibson agreed it was now obvious that the misinformation talking point was internationally co-ordinated among the Five Eyes alliance with the concurrent attacks in Australia, Canada, the US and the UK.
In March, at the launch of Reality Check Radio, Peter Williams revealed how he got offside with the MediaWorks company which ran his Magic Talk radio show. He began to question the vaccine mandates and said “I don’t know what set off the spark in my brain”.
Williams not only questioned it in his own mind but began to talk about his concerns with the mandate in 2021. “They (the management) said to me your program has become known as anti-vax central … so I said well, isn’t it good that there’s at least once space in the airwaves where these particular things can be talked about, after all, we are a free, liberal society are we not – a free democratic society where freedom of speech is allowed?”
Williams said the radio bosses’ response tipped him over the edge. “Well there will be financial implications for the company and for the station if you don’t change your thinking.” Williams had a think about it overnight and quit the next day. Williams said he subsequently found out the NZ government had spent $125 million in 2021-22 on media advertising, mainly pushing vaccines and other messages during the pandemic – well above the $70 to $75 million a year spent by the likes of Harvey Norman or Toyota. Trudeau in Canada played the same bribery game with the media there.
It also emerged through the Brennan round table chat that Jacinda Ardern felt the heat of public disdain and that led her to resign. Popular blogger and RCR host Cam Slater said Ardern had gone on holiday and found herself under repeated verbal attack from people. “Ardern thought she was saviour of New Zealand and then went on holiday to find people crossing the road to avoid her or getting heckled,” he said.
The program also discussed the latest in a series of “disinformation surveys” of New Zealanders. Conducted by the Disinformation Project it found 26% of respondents attributed disinformation to official sources and 23% believing secret groups hold power over government. It must have come as a shock to the sponsors.
The opinion of Sir Harry Gibbs, Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia from 1981 to 1987
.
Copy of Letter from Sir Harry Gibbs
Page 1
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
I am a former member of the High Court and I wish to take this unusual method of informing you about a matter that is going to deeply affect us all. Unfortunately, a document such as this is too easily “lost” in the bureaucratic jungle in which we operate………….
.
“…………..In view of the above, the historical evidence for Australian Independence by 10 January 1920 when the League of Nations became part of International Law is overwhelming. When this evidence is reinforced with the contents of the Charter of the United Nations, the continued usage of any legislation that owes its very legitimacy to the parliament of an acknowledged foreign power cannot be supported by either legal opinion or indeed historical evidence.
.
I therefore have come to the conclusion that the current legal and political system in use in
Australia and its States and Territories has no basis in law.
.
Following discussions with members of the British Government relating to the Letters Patent for the Governor General and State Governors I find that these documents no longer have any authority.
.
Indeed, the Queen of the United, Kingdom is excluded from any position of power in Australia by the United Nations Charter and is excluded under UK law from the issue of a Letters Patent to other than a British Subject. A Letters Patent must refer to an action to be taken with regard to British Citizens.
.
The Immigration Act. 1972 UK defines Australian Citizen as aliens.
.
The Governor General’s Letters Patent is a comedy of errors. We are greeted in the name of the Queen of Australia who suddenly becomes the Queen of the United Kingdom in the next paragraph of the Letters Patent. This Queen the gives instructions to the Governor General with reference to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK. Here we have a clear breach of Article 2 paragraph 1 of the United Nation Charter. Under both UK and international law, the-Queen is a British Citizen.
.
State Governors are in a worse position as their authority comes from the late Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom. Regardless of the validity of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 UK, if the authority of Governor General and the State Governors is invalid then so is the entire political and legal system of government.
.
When advised that the War Crimes Commission was taking an interest, I called them in Geneva. Under the 1947 Geneva Convention, they are empowered to look into eases here in Australia where it is alleged the law of a foreign country was enforced against a citizen of a member state of the United Nations. As they perceive that only the judiciary can actually enforce the law, the judiciary becomes their target. The group has already placed cases before them which they ate currently investigating. If found guilty, the penalties are horrific and include the death penalty!
.
I could go on with more relevant information however I think now is the time for a summary. The group leader, a QC, states the obvious when he asked me how could a colony now acknowledged by all world nations to be a sovereign Nation retain exactly the same legal and political system it enjoyed as a colony without any change whatsoever to the basis for law. This point alone requires an answer.
.
The High Court has already answered with regard to the position held by treaties signed by the Commonwealth Government in the Teoh case of 1994. “Ordinary people have the right to expect government officials to consider Australia’s international obligations even if those obligations are not reflected in specific Acts of Parliament: the rights recognised in international treaties are an implied limit on executive processes.”
.
My advice is to adjourn any case “sine die” that that challenges the authority of the Letters
Patent. Under no circumstances hear a case that challenges the validity of a State or the
Federal Constitution. It is the politicians who are using us as pawns without them having to
face the music. These matters are of concern to politicians, let them sort out these problems
and accept any inherent risks themselves!
.
Article 36 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice is the correct reference for you to refuse to hear a matter when an international treaty is cited as a defence.
.
http://nationalunitygovernment.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/pdf-doc/120813-%20Sir%20Harry%20Gibbs.pdf
G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. – Said:
“While States/Territory/Commonwealth may legislate in Criminal legislation in the end if it is unconstitutional it will lack any legal force. My ongoing peaceful conduct may underline we can defeat them using our constitution as our working tool!”
I agree.
Since before, but especially from 1973, all of the governments have put in place truck loads of legislation (I know legislation and law differ) that we follow and comply with.
Whether any of the legislation / regulations, etc, are unconstitutional is of no concern to them. They own the private corporate courts that do not use/follow our Constitution or use common law, in their courts.
The shonky legislation “is” used as a legal force because the average Australian has no idea of what has been done by the traitors.
Trying to sort the mess out in their contract law courts can have only very limited success.
Bottom line, we know it is shonky and may soon not be able to say so using any public or private forums,
While States/Territory/Commonwealth may legislate in Criminal legislation in the end if it is unconstitutional it will lack any legal force. My ongoing peaceful conduct may underline we can defeat them using our constitution as our working tool!
While the federal government seeks to claim it exposed the RoboDebt issue reality is that its scam regarding the purported ‘digital misinformation’ legislation is far worse but seeks to use the RoboDebt to seek to avoid drawing attention to itself.
https://www.scribd.com/document/660729715/20230724-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Attorney-General-Mark-Dreyfus-COMPLAINT-ACCESS-PROHIBITED
Something big is brewing in a Lousiana courtroom
The Judge is calling the defendant “Orwellian,” and the defendant happens to be the federal government; The New York Times responds with lowlife scumbaggery
Jon Rappoport
22 July 2023
The judge has issued an injunction against the federal government, ordering it to stop colluding with, and pressuring, social media to censor speech as if it were an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth.”
The case is ongoing. There are many plaintiffs, including doctors and The Gateway Pundit.
The main areas of censorship: COVID, rigged elections, and the Hunter Biden laptop story.
The fact that the judge issued the injunction suggests his eventual ruling will favor the plaintiffs and slam the federal government………………………..”
https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/something-big-is-brewing-in-a-lousiana-courtroom?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Yeah Bob I believe there is a story coming about this. Ed
https://lifedownunder.exposed/podcast/khazarian-mafia-warhorse-for-the-papal-bloodlines-earths-ruling-elite/
Video credit: Gray Stanton Life Down under Podcast
The problem seems to be that most of the Oz and Kiwi populations are sooo mind controlled and fearful of losing the second class enslaved lives seemingly granted to them by Ashkenazi (KM) banksters and their political lackeys and judicial and Police enforcers, that they cannot think, let alone escape from the mental prison matrix created by the cognitive dissonance, inculcated in their first 20 years of life.
Apparently off-worlders are amazed that we accept that we hafta PAY to live on the planet of our birth. And when you THINK about it, it IS ridiculous. For instance Millions of us can’t afford a home or a plot of land; OR have them taken from us by banks who fraudulently pretend that digits they type into our bank accounts are MONEY for which our unlawful corporate governments and unlawful courts and police corporations FORCE us to pay to banks (PLUS interest) the real wealth we create with our ingenuity and labour. That is abject slavery.
And all that is required to get the Oz and Kiwi nations to accept the abject spiritual, intellectual and physical poverty entailed in paying the fruits of our life energies to fraudulent banks, ALL our lives, for notional digital book keeping entries, is to threaten to call us names and to actually persecute the few individuals rational and brave enough to refuse to pay, saying: “These banks are frauds, they and the governments and courts that enforce their EXTORTION RACKET, are like emperors who ‘have no clothes'”!
The reason that these government policies and threatened activities are becoming more and more ridiculous is that very few people say “NO” and even fewer have the gall to tell their families, friends, work colleagues and acquaintances, WHY they say “NO”?
The fear ridden masses prefer to kill the messenger than heed the message. It happened to Christ Jesus and is repeated, at least metaphorically, every day.
The issue is one of consciousness. Dumb animals don’t need freedom.
Before we can be free of the negative influences destroying us and our world a minimum number of individuals must stand up and reject the lying, fraudulent, prison world in which we live.
THAT is what Universe Management and its Global Alliance agents are waiting for. Until it happens the Theatre of the Absurd in which we live will continue and get worse.
@obviousbob
Good to see you’re also a Jon Rappaport Substack subscriber. Read that one this morning. He certainly has a unique and powerful way of putting it out there.
obviousbob said – some stuff about laws and such.
Good sleuthing, Bob.
The problem I can see is that NONE of these treasonous brain-dead bastards to whom these laws apply give a rat’s arse about ANY laws, and there’s no-one around who’s willing or able to ENFORCE said laws anyway.
And they’re all armed to the teeth by their PRIVATE CORPORATE EMPLOYERS with weapons paid for by OUR TAXES, and they all get HUGE boners whenever they get a chance to assault, torture and kill us – especially little school girls and little old ladies.
So who ya gonne call?
The Editor may not have read my email before this post went up, however that post featured this article from the great Jon Rappaport:
https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/something-big-is-brewing-in-a-lousiana-courtroom?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
My forwarding to the Editor included the protection afforded people’s political rights and duties under the Crimes Act 1914, Section 28, and the Criminal Code Act 1995, Section 83.4, both of which make such interference a criminal act, punishable by 10 and 3 years jail, respectively.
Perhaps Ed. will publish that document, as no corporate government can defeat the Crimes Act, 1914, as that is real, lawfully-valid, Royally Consented, Law, which cannot be repealed by said corporate governments.
The Criminal Code Act is mere statute, which has no applicability to actual living people, but is valid for governments and their employees and agents (namely: the CORPORATE POLICE and other agencies).
If you turn off your TV, can you avoid getting stressed and catching C19?
Good luck to the grubs
I had a quick read of the ACMA legislation. If articles & comments include phrases like ‘this comment/article is for entertainment purposes only’ or ‘intended as satire’ or posit comments as a question, that might work as a workaround of control freak parasites. I think TheJuiceMedia on You-Tube ‘Honest Government Ads’ uses these kinds of technique.