Category Archives: People Control
Letters to the Editor
Hullo Folks! I walked out of Woolworths today because I demanded to sign in with paper. The young bully told me “To get with the digital Age” I said I was still in the paper age” Well ,he was not going to budge,so I asked for a refund to get out of there and they told me that they did not offer refunds.So I said again I would sign on paper as the other shops gave choices. He refused rudely and so I berated him for being rude to an older Australian(he being a younger Australian approx of 25)
I put my goods ,paid and all on the counter and I left saying to him I hope that he would feel guilty at how they treated me.
He replied”I never feel guilty!”
I proceeded to shop at another shop and thankfully there was an other choice but I feel very saddened at this rudeness. If this is how the young treat us while we are still capable,heaven help us when we become very old!
I feel that Victor Dominello has gone “over the top” with this Digital stuff!He is the Minister for Digital Communications.in NSW liberal government.
A RELY: Hey Mate – yep I shopped at Woollies for years but when they put the guard ( lady) on the door checking papers – no more. We should all start supporting our local shops/businesses and using CASH!! I do.. Coles is ok for now but really they are all owned by the same people – they implement their crap incrementally..And yes – we older people are in their sites for removal – The forced injection of these poisons on sick frail people in homes will haunt me to my (imminent as they would have it) death..disgrace..
Diminishing Nurses – No Jab No Job
Yes they are stupid, So many nurses are now vaccinated, this shows why we now get real poor service. I was a Nurse for 24 years and I walked out 6.5 years ago because of bullying.
If qualified nurses don’t know what Gene therapy is then they are lost.
Also any one wearing a mask for protection is a fool but remember there may be mask wearers who wear them to hide from crap scrutiny and to blend in, so not all mask wearers are stupid.
“That’s how it was done by the Nazis in Germany”
It’ll work better than in Nazi Germany. No need for executions or force or violence, You’ll be begging for your right to exist, own nothing and be happy as Larry after every brainwashed Tom, Dick or Harry shuns you in solidarity with the Fearless Leader.
Australian is a nation full of Sheeple
They have had the wool pulled over their eyes by corrupt, traitorous, politicians and the media, been fleeced in the process, of their savings, jobs and businesses, as they meekly allow themselves to be led to slaughter. Sheep are herded and controlled through fear, and that is what is happening here.
Once the sheeple wake up and realize they have been betrayed and are now trapped, they will proceed to bleat and may stampede. Woe betide those friendly family physicians who jabbed them with a poisonous vax – they may need to hide.
Some doctors have predicted that those who have been jabbed will die within 2-5 years.
Besides the threat of blood clots, the ‘vaccines’ so compromise the immune system that the body is open to all pathogens. Can you imagine life in 5 year’s time with 70-80% of the population gone?
Is that the worse case scenario?
Are you still awake, Australia?
Total surveillance and total population control in action. Soon enough you’ll have to have a passport to go to the toilet. A passport for anywhere you go and for everything you do.
When you refuse to toe the line, they’ll simply cancel you. No money, no food, no access to anywhere or anything. Simple, just press the DELETE key.
Can’t wait till I am happy and thrilled to bits by owning nothing and depending on the whim of some fashionably woke moron for survival.
Big Brother ID
What is the world coming to? A digital ID? Why don’t you just throw us all in the gas chambers and be done with it? That’s the control the government wants. I will slit my throat outside of parliament house before I do this or have the ‘vaccine’.
“This is your Australia Today”
Qld Premier trumpets Mareeba in the Far North will be the first state school to get deadly Covid jabs
The push by the medical mafia to maim or kill your kids has been ramped up in earnest with the Labor Premier announcing in State Parliament today the poor kids of Mareeba State School will be jabbed with an experimental mRNA inoculation that according the many of the world’s best epidemiologists and virologists will alter a victim’s DNA and eventually kill.
A distraught Mareeba parent contacted Cairns News today terrified the ‘state’ will hurt her kids.
What makes the parent’s anxiety worse is she worked for many years as a health professional.
“I am not anti-vax but I have done a lot of research about the Covid epidemic and found it is largely untrue,” the parent said.
“There is no doubt that the inexpensive and safe Ivermectin can be administered in the case of an infection or as a prophylactic. Look at India, they have just about eradicated infections by giving the population Ivermectin.
“I will not allow the state to inoculate my kids with an experimental vaccine.
“I was told this week of a family living near town whose 14 year old son was vaxxed and now he is very sick and medical advice is he will be injured for life with a serious heart condition as a result of the inoculation.”
“Avi is starting to become a bit more problematic. So we might need to look at what Avi’s role is here in the moment.”
We caught a senior police officer on video saying that to his fellow riot cops. They were trying to get me to stop reporting on the lockdown protests in Melbourne.
But they didn’t dare arrest me again. Because I’m already suing them in the Supreme Court for assault and false arrest. And they know that millions of people are watching.
So the police are doing something even worse: they’re going after the people close to me.
You already saw police showing up in the dead of night to my home, demanding that I stop my journalism. They knew that wouldn’t scare me. But they knew it would scare my family.
When that didn’t stop me, they tried something else: they brutally assaulted and falsely arrested Daniel Jones, the security guard who accompanies me on my journalism.
Daniel is a complete professional. He’s licensed and insured and wears a bright vest with his name, his company name and the word “security” on it. Police know exactly who he is. He’s a gentle giant who never picks a fight, and does his best to de-escalate any situation. They had no cause to target him — other than they know I rely on Daniel to keep me safe
Which is why they attacked him, threw him to the ground, punched him, kneed him, and put handcuffs on him so tightly that even an hour later, his wrists were still bright red.
And to add insult to injury, they gave Daniel a $1,817 ticket — their way of saying if he continues to work with me, he should expect a lot more abuse.
Well, I’ve had enough. So we filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court, suing the police for their illegal misconduct towards Daniel.
Please click here to read the lawsuit for yourself. It lays out exactly what the police did to Daniel, and why it’s so wrong.
Daniel doesn’t have the money to sue the police. And the police have the unlimited resources of the state of Victoria behind them.
But I told him: our viewers will help. Because the work I do is only possible because Daniel has my back.
The police think that if they can break Daniel, maybe they can break me, too.
Maybe if I don’t have someone watching my back… well, maybe something bad will happen to me. By choosing to target my bodyguard, police are telling me that I’m not safe. Just like when they came to my family home.
That’s police state stuff. Not the stuff of a great democracy like Australia.
Please help me. I know I ask for your help a lot, but this is for Daniel, not for me. We have a team of top-notch lawyers going to court for Daniel. Please click here to help me crowdfund their fees, or go to www.StandWithDaniel.com.
We’re going to fight for Daniel, because he was attacked by the police. But also because we need a judge in Victoria to tell police in general that they’re out of control. Daniel’s case is the perfect one.
If you can help me, please click here, and chip in a few dollars to help cover the costs of our excellent lawyers.
Do it for me — and do it for my protector, Daniel.
Chief Australia Correspondent
P.S. There were literally nine cops that jumped on Daniel. He didn’t resist, but they punched and kneed him anyways. It was their way of showing me who’s boss.
P.P.S. The proper way to fight back is in the court of law, by showing a judge what these brutal cops did, and demanding justice. Please click here, or go to www.StandWithDaniel.com if you want to help us do just that. (Thanks.)
By Subscriber Alison
A Bill to enable use of foreign troops or foreign police in Australian “emergencies” is called the “Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force response to Emergencies) Bill, 2020”.
Parliament of Aust website: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2021a/21bd015
Quotes from sources:
Further the legislation includes the use of foreign military forces and foreign police to assist in “emergencies”. Surely we Australians are, with appropriate resources and organisation, capable of addressing emergencies without the need for foreign troops or foreign police. And we certainly don’t want these foreign forces confronting and suppressing legitimate protest actions by Australian citizens.
In addition the legislation provide immunity from civil or criminal prosecution to the defence forces including foreign military, for their actions in these “emergencies”.
The “grossly inadequate” Human Rights Statement “does not address public rights that may well be infringed under these provisions.” The proposed immunities would also extend to “foreign military and police forces”, suggesting more than a cheerful nod of approval to those nuclear armed allies across the pond. “The use of a foreign army or militarised police force should not be allowed at all, and certainly not without the safeguard of citizens’ rights of access to courts.”
Under the cover of stealth and reliable apathy, powers have been vested in Australia’s military and ministerial authorities with scant debate and even less scrutiny. As law academic Michael Head points out with noticeable alarm, powers calling out the Australian Defence Force to deal with, for instance, “domestic violence”, or likely dangers to “declared infrastructure” are left undefined. Vagueness bedevils the legislation, passed ostensibly to protect the populace against terrorist attacks. “Once deployed, military personnel can exercise extraordinary powers over civilians, overturning basic legal and democratic rights.”
The government insists that the bill does not authorise armed force against civilians, but there is no such protection in the legislation. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/10/16/mili-o16.html
I BELIEVE there are very worrying implications in a bill being considered in federal parliament. It is called the Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force response to Emergencies) Bill, 2020. It enables the ADF and Reserves to be used in emergencies, but “emergencies” is undefined.
Bushfire assistance is one emergency which might be justified but could certain so-called disruptive industrial actions or disruptive mass climate change protests be considered emergencies? These are legitimate actions in our democracy, and I believe being confronted or suppressed by the defence forces or reserves would not be a legitimate use of these forces in a healthy democracy.
Further, the legislation includes the use of foreign military forces and foreign police to assist in emergencies. Surely we Australians are, with appropriate resources and organisation, capable of addressing emergencies without the need for foreign troops or foreign police? We certainly don’t want these foreign forces confronting and suppressing legitimate protest actions by Australian citizens.
Our political representatives in federal parliament should be urged to halt this legislation until it is closely examined by civil rights and constitutional law experts to ensure our civil and democratic rights are not under threat or our sovereignty compromised by this legislation.
It’s about setting up a hub within our national borders to kickstart the next step towards the overall goals of complete implementation of the UN Agenda 2030 doctrine.
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
The chances of dying with Covid or from Covid in NSW over the last 20 months are 128 in 8,200,000 or 1 in 64,062. That’s a lot lower than the annual flu or road death risk.
It should be easy enough to conclude that the govt is deliberately locking up millions of people and spreading fear in the population as it destroys the economy and the lives of millions of people because of some other reason (or agenda) which is not related to the risk of people dying.
If such fear mongering were perpetrated by a foreign government, it would be called state sponsored terrorism. If the incarceration and denial of our basic freedoms and human rights were also perpetrated by a foreign government we would consider it a declaration of war against the Australian people.
So what do we call all that in the case of our own governments?
This is not vax vs anti-vax, this is not state vs state, this is human rights. Do you want to ask the government permission to go see your Mum who lives in another state or never travel to another state because they’ve decided your not allowed in.
We need our rights and freedom back, we can use our numbers, lets use people power. We all need to get involved for it to work. Please take this seriously and take a few minutes to help protect your rights, protect the children’s future!
Craig Kelly Introducing the Bill for ‘No domestic COVID vaccination passports 2021’
Letter to your Senator template and your local Senator look up
Local senator look up;
You can copy the Template Letter from directly below (same as one in link above) add your own details (senators details at the top your name at the bottom).
Note – make it your own; take or add what you like/belief, we are individuals and have our own beliefs so please express your beliefs as i said we are talking about protecting our Human Rights with this Bill, Covid is just the easy fear tactic for us (Australian’s/Humanity) to not fight for our ‘rights’ and freely give up our birth right of ‘freedom’ to move uninhibited around our big beautiful country we all love so much. Fight for Australia, fight for our freedom and fight for our future generations freedom.
To ____ the Federal member for _____
I’m writing to you as a concerned constituent, as I am deeply disturbed by the prospect of limited travel under the introduction of domestic vaccine passports.
Restricting travel as a means of coercing the population of Australia into receiving a vaccine that is still in it’s trial phases is extremely unethical, and I’m of the firm belief that to do so is a gross violation of our civil liberties and medical autonomy.
To restrict our freedom of movement in exchange for a medical procedure or otherwise goes against:
- The Universal declaration of human rights – article 13
- The Australian human rights commission – article 12
- The Australian Commonwealth Constitution – section 92
Covid-19 vaccines have somehow breezed through the system without TGA approval under rushed emergency legislation with no scientific transparency, and I’m disgusted that our federal government would consider restricting our freedom of movement as a means of coercing Australians into accepting a substance that has not yet been proven safe or effective.
To restrict Australian’s from interstate or intrastate travel is an outrageous violation of our human rights, and completely disproportionate to the objective of effectively managing covid-19.
It is completely unnecessary and wildly unethical to coerce Australian’s into making a medical decision without so much as a standard TGA approval.
In light of this information, I strongly urge you as one of your constituents to uphold the Australian people’s right to choose and vote in favour of Craig Kelly’s ‘No Domestic Vaccine Passports Bill 2021’.
If you choose not to protect our rights as Australians as a priority going forward, you will leave me no choice but to vote against you in the next election.
Comment by Devon Seamoor
@Clifton Hodges. Thank you for your webpage, that’s a bunch of info. I also understand why a friend recommended to use Glutathione NAC (N-acetylcysteine), to remove Graphene Dioxide. Another remedy that is an oxidiser, Chlorine Dioxide alias MMS, is delivered by a German company. The German word “Wasseraufbereitung” means “Waterpurifier” . It’s used by Jim Humble in the 70’s, when he traveled in Africa, using this substance to purify the water for drinking, by him and his team, in the jungle.
It’s when he gave some of it to his team members who were suffering from malaria fevers, causing much delay as well, he noticed that all symptoms disappeared, including the parasite in their blood. From one thing came another, and this “miracle healing” news began to spread like wildfire. It’s how African villages were treated with MMS, and thousand’s of malaria patients recovered their good health. Here’s Jim Humble’s site, jam packed with info, including a page with testimonies of MMS users: https://jimhumble.co/
Jim Humble’s work was ridiculed, by Big Pharma, and MMS was pushed to the corner of rubbish, or so Big Pharma made sure of that. This is why the German company can only offer MMS as water purifier and not as a remedy.
Here’s the MMS page: https://www.vitalundfitmit100.de/wasseraufbereitung
Here’s the N-Acetyl-L-Cystein page:
To be clear, I’m not profiting in any form or way, from offering this information. My intention is to share info and methods, remedies or exercises, online, so that people can inform themselves, and come to an understanding in order to make their own choice. At this moment, I believe we’re collectively up against huge challenges, that can be used for the better, when we choose to live in freedom of expression.
Letter To The Editor
by Tanya Crawford
With the media making outrageous claims on the number of infected – all BS of course – and cases getting out of control in several Australian states the ground seems fertile for such a draconian move.
What prompted me to contact you was that I saw your article about Australia wide protests, which I 100% support. We need to do something to stop this Orwellian nightmare.
What worries me though is we are damned if we do and damned if we don’t. If the protests go ahead that is all the justification our authoritarian government will need to enforce a stage 5 lock down.
Like the tea party fiascos, is it possible there are rogue elements organizing, or involved with the protests that could be working against the sensible folk of Australia (few as we are), trying to force such a lock down?
We need millions of people though. A few hundred or even a few thousand people in each state is not going to be enough. Scary stuff.
World leaders per capita, Australia’s 25M population supports 54 spy agencies watching and listening everyday. All sanctioned by late night government bills passing in the name of national security without accountability.
Dutton is our Ian Flemming’s “M” (MORON) licensed dill.
Dictatorship in disguise is alive and well. If it were not factual one could be forgiven for assuming it was a full colour academy awarded Walt Disney comedy production.
Touching but the surface referencing your privacy and freedom violation by corrupt government, take heed of the following information, ask your self the question – “am I feeding votes to a political machine destroying my freedom”?.
Information from “Sydney Criminal Lawyers” Australia’s Leading Criminal Defence firm
Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton has been absent from the media spotlight in recent times, ever since he contracted coronavirus.
And many are asking where the man at the helm of curtailing civil liberties on a federal level has been in the midst of the current pandemic.
The man at the helm of the surveillance state
Mr Dutton has been credited with proposing a wide range of laws designed to increase the power of authorities at the expense of individual liberties.
Among these, are proposed laws which would result in prison time for those who fail or refuse to hand over their passwords or PINs when requested to do so by authorities.
Peter Dutton says these types of laws are needed to help police catch criminals who are hiding behind encryption technology – a line we have heard many times before as the country’s law makers put in place draconian measures to grant police and other authorities surveillance powers that encroach upon our privacy.
Under the proposals, people who are not even suspected of a crime would face a fine of up to $50,000 and up to five years’ imprisonment for declining to provide a password to their smartphone, computer or other electronic devices.
Furthermore, anyone (an IT professional, for example) who refuses to help the authorities crack a computer system when ordered will face up to five years in prison. If the crime being investigated is terrorism-related then the penalty for non-compliance increases to 10 years in prison and/or a $126,000 fine.
Tech companies who refuse to assist authorities to crack encryption when asked to do so, will face up to $10 million in fines. What’s more, if any employee of the company tells anyone else they have been told to do this, they will face up to five years in gaol.
Under the legislation, foreign countries can also ask Australia’s Attorney General for police to access data in your computer to help them investigate law-breaking overseas.
Australia’s hyper-legislative response to September 11
Since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States, the Australian parliament has responded to the threat of terrorism here and overseas by enacting more than 80 new laws and amending existing laws – many of them with wide-reaching consequences, such as the terrorism laws used to conduct raids on journalist Annika Smethurst’s home and the ABC’s head offices, as well as charge former military lawyer and whistleblower David Mc Bride with offences that could see him spending the rest of his life in gaol.
Controversial metadata laws too, introduced in 2015, seriously impact our personal privacy requiring telecommunications companies to retain metadata including information on who you call or text, where you make calls from, and who you send emails to.
The problem is that once these kinds of extraordinarily heavy-handed powers are legislated, they are very seldom retracted or rescinded. In many cases, over time, they are expanded. Australia’s oversight body the Australian Law Reform Commission can review laws that are already in place, but it has limited powers which only enable the commission to make recommendations for change, not to actually change the laws themselves.
Police already have the power to seize a phone or laptop if you have been arrested.
Border Force has even more extensive seize and search powers.
The extensive powers of border force
In 2018, Border Force made headlines after intercepting an British-Australian citizen travelling through Sydney airport seizing his devices.
Nathan Hague, a software developer was not told what would be done with his devices, why they were being inspected or whether his digital data was being copied and stored. He believes his laptop password was cracked.
Australian Border Forces have extensive powers to search people’s baggage at Australian airports. These are contained in section 186 of Customs Act 1901 (Cth). These include opening baggage, reading documents, and using an X-ray or detection dog to search baggage.
The Customs Act allows officers to retain an electronic device for up to 14 days if there is no content on the device which renders it subject to seizure. And if it is subject to seizure, the device may be withheld for a longer period.
ABF officers have the power to copy a document if they’re satisfied it may contain information relevant to prohibited goods, to certain security matters or an offence against the Customs Act. A document includes information on phones, SIM cards, laptops, recording devices and computers.