Armed home invaders at Lithgow NSW. Meet force with force.
The right to defend yourself or others during a home or property invasion without fear of legal consequences may soon be a reality for Queenslanders after Hinchinbrook MP Nick Dametto introduced a Castle Law bill into the Queensland Parliament today.
after lawless home invaders
Sign the petition: https://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/Work-of-the-Assembly/Petitions/Petition-Details?id=4077
The Private Members bill, titled the Criminal Code (Defence of Dwellings and Other Premises—Castle Law) Amendment Bill 2024, aims to bolster the legal defence available to victims of home invasions who act to defend themselves even if that act results in the serious harm, or death of an intruder.
The Katter’s Australian Party (KAP) Deputy Leader said he had listened to Queenslanders who had been calling for more rights for self-defence when faced with the prospect of having to defend themselves against an intruder in their own home.
“Currently a person can only defend themselves with force that is reasonably necessary in all of the
circumstances. What is deemed ‘reasonable’ is open to very broad interpretation,” Mr Dametto said.
“We strongly believe everyone should have the right to defend themselves in their own home or premises.
“This is why on behalf of KAP I have introduced this Castle Law Bill to test the Queensland Parliament’s support for this legislative change.
“As this bill goes through the parliamentary process, people from across the state will be able to have their say on whether or not this policy should be enshrined in Queensland law.
“The rationale of Castle Law is not about promoting unnecessary violence. Its aim is to give occupants legal protections against unintended consequences of defending themselves.”
Castle Law, or the “castle doctrine” is a legal principle that recognises a person’s right to defend their home against intruders without facing legal consequences. The roots of the Castle Doctrine can be found in the English common law as far back as 1604 in the famous Semayne’s case where the court held that:
“The house of everyone is to him as his castle and fortress, as well for his defence against injury or violence as for his repose”.
It stems from the idea that one’s home is their castle, a place where they should feel safe and secure. This
doctrine strikes at the very core of an individual’s fundamental right to protect themselves and their loved
ones within their own property.
“Queenslanders want to be assured that when protecting their home and families, the law will be there to protect them. In a split-second situation where it is either fight or flight Queenslanders should be afforded solid legislative protections from legal recourse after doing what was necessary to protect against a home invader,” Mr Dametto said.
“The Bill contains some carefully considered circumstances where Castle Law should apply and these are
consistent with other provisions of the criminal code.
“The safety and security of Queensland residents should be a basic human right. I believe good laws should be in place to protect good people, and adopting Castle Law is an important step towards achieving this goal”.
Tabasco in a spray bottle works well.I’m old and I’ll use it!
He doesn’t look very ‘Asian’ to me. He looks to me like a teflon African import for the United [Communist] Nations CoVID Regime replacement programme for the White Australians. Bet you anything Mr ‘Asian’ sexed up and rape inclined belongs to one of the many vibrant and culturally enriching African communities in Melbourne. How hard are the Covid coppers going to look for this guy?
You could always ask Sarah Hanson Young to put up some bill in the senate to keep intruders out of your house. Have you got any cream puffs or if you want to get real nasty, a garden hose? Editor
jabfree said – “… do I have to take a machete chop for the team in order to legally respond?”
If you just kill them all, you can be reasonably confident that they won’t try again.
And maybe the next pack of ferals will think twice.
If five drug crazed machete knife wielding youthlings appeared in my house and I kill one is that not fair and reasonablle being five to one?
Or do I have to take a machete chop for the team in order to legally respond? Pie in the Sky fancies from Katter like he cares or something.
The gun laws would come into play: how did you get your keys to the safe, and to the separately stored ammo, load the magazine and get the gun ready to fire in such a short time?
“BOOM!” – “Why did you shoot him?” “He broke into my house.” “Did you have to kill him?” “Yeah, he was the victim of ‘occupational hazard’.”
Quite apart from anything else, debating whether you used reasonable force is going to cost you a fortune in legal costs in court whereas an assailant might get just a slap on the wrist for their effort.
That means we’re sitting ducks, legally and financially, for anyone who chooses to exploit our hands behind our backs vulnerability with negligible consequences to themselves.
In this case the law is an ass and those who framed it as such are more concerned for welfare of the asshouls.
If they force their way into your house, they should be met with deadly force.
The reason why this is such a contentious issue is because it is a racial issue. It is not a juvies with machetes issue. It is not a poverty issue. It is not a ‘forms gangs and does not assimilate’ issue.
It is a racial, Makarrata and migration issue – claimed by those of the right colour whose ancestors [so they say] got dudded by some European population somewhere. Backed by the Soros Payroll and their trained Marxist Commissars they are bringing the Marxist sistema of crime, chaos and corruption against ‘the racial enemy’. If you are White, if you are of European ancestry, if you are of Anglo-Celtic ancestry – that is you , old chap.
And in the country of the fair go which would like to see everyone who lives here have opportunities to create his or her life, this is ugly. And. It is going to get uglier.
As everyone should have seen [and taken note] during the Corona Baloney Hoax 2020 and the CoVID Shield Operation – churches are made to close, Australians protesting an entire swag of bullshit, unconstitutional, illegal mandates, rulz®s and ‘no jab / no job’ injections with a bioweapon are locked down and enforced by the covid coppers. But to the Black Lives Matter rioters on the Soros Payroll – rioting, car jacking, smashing and looting – the covid coppers take the knee.
We have seen it and we can not unsee it.
The deprivation of property and denial of the right to property is a cornerstone of the Communist Takeover of this country. The Marxist government of the United [Communist] Nations can not put the boot into the White European demographic unless they are running the Marxist sistema of Crime, Chaos, Corruption.
And crime must be enabled from the Top, otherwise a White population will deal with it expeditiously under Common Law and natural justice – a right that even animals exercise.
Observe the wombat. In the words of Banjo Patterson: ‘he doesn’t know much, but what he knows – he knows’. Even the wombat brings deadly force to burrow invaders when it comes to defense of the burrow, the wombattings, Mrs. wombat and the grass stash. Check out the segment on world’s deadliest butt. @2.55.
Sometime in the future, some idiot is going to make someone’s day when he breaks into someone’s castle and goes out in a bag. Just saying that for someone else 🙂
It is only a matter of time and there won’t be any homeowners left in Australia thanks to Klaus Schwab’s WEF and our TREASONOUS governments following WEF’s orders.
Where is the legislation to protect us from the WEF invading and destroying Australia? Taking our Liberties and Properties away.
WEF’s ‘famous’ catchcry:
“You will own nothing and you will be happy”, because they will then own everything and they will be very happy.
World Economic Forum: The Great Reset — You’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy
h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zUjsEaKbkM
A stand-your-ground law, sometimes called “a line in the sand” or “no duty to retreat law” exists in every US State. It is generally lawful for people to use deadly force where it is necessary to defend themselves against prior deadly force, great injury and likely kidnapping or rape. The law exists in varying degrees across the US. Some states allow it against threats of robbery and burglary.
[…] Go to Source on cairnsnews.org Follow altnews.org on Telegram Please donate now! 00 […]
Now where’s the legislation to protect us from the marauding packs of shit-for-brains hired mercenary gangsters who beat up little old ladies and school girls in broad daylight and shoot peaceful unarmed Australians just to give their superiors a big boner?
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]
[…] Source link […]