
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
JACINTA Allan, the new premier picked by Victoria’s Socialist Left faction of the Labor Party, should send “indigenous” bureaucrats on to your property without your permission to see whether you are offending “indigenous cultural values”, according to members of the Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Council (VAHC).
These privileged neo-Marxist activists, who identify as “indigenous”, want special “heritage protection” officers to do the job, and the new premier is naturally sympathetic to their cause. Already she supports this same indigenous elite imposing more bans on rock and mountain climbing around Victoria. After all, how dare “non-indigenous” people climb a rock, swim in a stream or walk in some bush where some invisible entity is said to dwell according to animist folklore.
The VAHC represents 11 Victorian Aboriginal corporations, who are being given enormous amounts of money from state and federal sources that allow them to exercise control over the wider population of Victoria and its institutions through land rights agreements, as we have previously reported.
The hard-line activist members of such organisations probably couldn’t care less about the result of the Voice referendum, because they are already doing what the Voice to Parliament would have endorsed anyway. The only difference is that they don’t have the instant access to the High Court that Constitutionally entrenched recognition would have given them.
As it is, the type of privilege they are seeking to literally trample on private property rights would be highly unlikely to survive a High Court or even a lower court challenge, due to previous cases supporting the common law right of people to use and enjoy private property. But various state heritage protection acts are chiselling away at this.
Joel Jammal, the prominent freedom fighter, is sending warnings across social media against this proposal and is urging people to use an MP email list at his website. Jammal reckons there are enough aware people who voted no in the Voice referendum to send another massive “no” to state politicians pushing this attack on property rights and large numbers have already responded.
It is no accident that “culture” is at the centre of this indigenist operation. Readers might recall some Chinese history where the Maoist Red Guards rampaged across the country denouncing educated, property owning “bourgeois” types not following the party line. It was called The Cultural Revolution.
Of course the modern neo-Marxists are much more subtle in their approach. If no opposition is mounted, private property owners will be progressively targeted by Mz Allan and her Victorian “Red Guards” if they dare dig a hole or cut down a tree without the heritage commissar’s permission. Allen and her comrades also have a big stake in the judiciary, and like their US Democrat partners, know how to use it for their political purposes.
Regardless of the Voice defeat, this campaign will be given strong symbolic weight under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples – one of the spearhead actions of Klaus Schwab’s “great reset”. Across the ditch in Kiwi Land this same campaign is called co-governance, and it is happening regardless of the fact that most of New Zealand’s Maori chiefs willingly ceded sovereignty to the British Crown under the Treaty of Waitangi way back in 1840.
The sheer gall of the indigenous radicals in Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia in launching this attack on property rights could lead one to believe that “the Voice” was just one big sideshow designed to distract from the real subversion taking place at state level.
dont these glo baal ists ever sleep? have time off ? holy day ? good God please help us all return to goodness and truth
Be warned!
The link to Terms & Conditions, which apply to the Activism Platform found on the “Stop State Voices” page of the Joel Jammal website, tpaust.com.au, state at:
Application, Variation, and Termination of these Terms and Conditions
1.1. These Terms and Conditions govern the services provided by Overton Corporation PTY LTD, which will henceforth be referred to as “Overton Solutions”, through our online platform.
1.2. Any use of the Overton Solutions platform by you constitutes acceptance of these Terms and Conditions.
Privacy
2.1. Any personal information received by Overton Solutions will be collected and disclosed in accordance with Overton Solutions’ Privacy Policy (as updated from time to time and available on their website.)
Use of Information
4.1. We use the personal information you provide to us to facilitate communication with elected representatives, send you service-related notifications, and provide the service.
Data Breach Notification
Data Breach Notification
5.1. In the event of a data breach that is likely to result in serious harm to the individuals whose personal information has been compromised, Overton Solutions will notify the affected individuals and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) in accordance with the Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme under the Australian Privacy Act 1988. Limitation of Liability
10.1. These Terms and Conditions, together with the Privacy Policy, constitute the entire agreement between you, Overton Solutions, and the client using the service with respect to the use of the platform.
I regret today using the platform yesterday which was set up to email dozens of my State’s top Labor MPs, under the heading – “Stop State Voice Push! Tell your State’s Labor MPs to oppose this agenda”.
Also be warned that there was no list of the MPs that came up on the platform for emailers to know to whom/or where the emails went.
I’ve watched Joel Jammal on Facebook and youtube and this guy worries me, even more than because of this drive of his.
“The longer this goes on the tighter the grip around our throats (contracts) increases.”
The Mafia is an octopus that won’t let go till you sever its tentacles. Old Phoenician proverb. 🙂
Editor, cairnsnews – ?Common law remains the only governing law of the land for the people. Editor”
100% agree with that.
Trouble is the parasites have put truck loads of systems in place that force people to contract with them.
Simply following / obeying their shonky legislation, codes, rules, regulations, etc, can mean that people are contracting with the grubs, with the corporations calling themselves governments.
The longer this goes on the tighter the grip around our throats (contracts) increases.
Editor, cairnsnews said – “Common law remains the only governing law of the land for the people.”
The governing “law of the land” is whatever the people think it is.
So until EVERYONE gets a better education, the governing “law of the land” will continue to be whatever the people PERMIT themselves to be “governed” by – at present, apparently, the fake “laws” imposed by fake mass-murdering corporate “governments” and enforced by corporate armies of treasonous shit-for-brains hired mercenaries who delight in impersonating “police” and inflicting wholesale theft, fraud, assault & battery, incarceration & imprisonment, torture, poisoning and all manner of atrocities INCLUDING murder on the Australian people.
It’s not so straighforward to release the sheep from their pen when that’s where they’ve lived for generations. A good proportion of them can’t even grasp the concept of freedom, and if they could, many wouldn’t want the responsibility.
Until all those that DO stand up and shoulder the burden, we’ll continue to be SCREWED by a bunch of corporate psychopaths hell-bent on our subjugation, exploitation & extermination.
While ever we have corporate ‘governments’ their policies, not laws are only applicable to members of the corporation, public servants and party members. They do not apply to the public unless you have a genuine contract with them to do business. Common law remains the only governing law of the land for the people. Editor
Australian cultural police? More racist claptrap. Needs to be relegated to history. All Aussies should be well over all that sht by now so when you hear it in the MSM or in politics or at the local tell it to go screw itself.
Don’t feed and entertain the fkrs any more if you value our country.
Your Human-Rights under the –
• ‘Charter of Human Rights & Responsibilities Act’ 2006, &
• ‘International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights’ 1980.
• CRIMES ACT, 1900 No 40 (IMP) section 12 & 348, The Treason sections
• CRIMINAL CODE ACT, 1899, sections 37, 38, 39 & 40, The Treason sections.
It was “illegal” to introduce local government as a third tier of government in Australia. The 1988 referendum, whether to have “Local Government” recognised in the Constitution or not, showed that two-thirds of Australians did not want local councils recognised as Local Government.
Unconstitutionally, and illegally, the following year the Hawke Labor Government introduced The Local Government Act 1989 legislation into all States of Australia, albeit not introduced into some States until 1993.
Yes, the legislation was passed, but under the powers of the Constitution for making laws, the legislation was illegal/unlawful because the people voted NO to recognise Local Government in the State governments.
Since 1986, when Bob Hawke and his Fabian Socialists brought in the Australia Act No. 142, 1985 without the permission of We the People voting in a Referendum, all Australian political party governments have operated outside the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 as a privately registered Corporation with the US Securities Exchange Corporation where you can easily search for, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CIK#: 0000805157.
And today we have the melting pot in Canberra called the National Cabinet which consists of PM, Premiers and ALGA (just as the major parties had promised before the last Federal election) with all the Ministerial Councils regularly reporting to National Cabinet on their progress to deliver “tasked priorities”. Meanwhile the G-G, who represents the King of Australia 1973, sits under the corporatised Federal government, which is so plainly visible for all who viewed the writ for the recent referendum, and which the AEC displayed on their website.
It’s a monstrous wicked fraud being played upon We the People. So, thanks, Joel Jammal for the work you’re doing on our behalf.
Let’s all rally to get those emails done.
DPHY4NT said – “Unfortunately ‘In Fee Simple’ is an indivisible contract with you and the Crown, and not even the King can enter your property without permission.”
1. I would have thought your observation on the nature of “In Fee Simple”, if accurate, would be “fortunate”, not “unfortunate”.
2. Notwithstanding alleged rules and so forth, ANYONE can enter your property without permission. The independent parameter is consequence. Who is going to enforce the rules? Not the King, if he decides to enter your property without your permission, nor all the King’s horses and all the King’s men, especially if they happen to be shit-for-brains armies of hired mercenaries who’d be much happier to put a bullet through your skull than bother with all those pesky rules.
None of it matters one little bit, if the Crown is AWOL.
daviddd2, said: “Common Law does NOT trump any LEGISLATION passed by a state Parliament and assented to by a state Governor.”
Sadly I have to agree.
The 1901 Constitution was supposed to protect Common Law and our Common Law freedoms and rights.
If the 1901 Constitution was followed and adhered to, a great deal of the legislation put in place by the shonky corporate governments would not exist.
The Constitution is Common Law, the protections provided in the Constitution are from Common Law.
Only shonky legislation can override the Common Law built into the Constitution
.
Who to blame, we the people, for sure, we let them do it.
DPHY4NT, said: ” Common Law rights are above all these muppets”
Yes it is, as found in our 1901 Constitution.
it is our highest law.
Trouble is, the parasites ignore our original 1901 Constitution.
Try getting a fair go in any Australian court using the Constitution and/or Common Law.
Highly likely they will just say they do not deal with Common Law or make decisions/findings about the Constitution.
Corporate courts deal with contract law and similar.
If they still used the 1901 Constitution and Common Law, they would not be able to do what they have done and continue to do.
For starters, making all levels of government, and the courts and police corporations.
The word that describes what they have done starts with the letter “T”
Reality can be very sad.
“Local Governments lawfully do not exist ron.”
I’d say that’s patently wrong. In NSW, for instance, local governments are provided for by state legislation:
see NSW LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1993 – SECT 7
Nothing in the Australian Constitution prevents state governments from exercising their “sovereign” power provided such exercise of power is NOT inconsistent with the Australian Constitution, Commonwealth legislation or any exclusive powers reserved by the Commonwealth.
Common Law does NOT trump any LEGISLATION passed by a state Parliament and assented to by a state Governor. Anything to the contrary is pie in the sky wishful thinking.
Unfortunately ‘In Fee Simple’ is an indivisible contract with you and the Crown, and not even the King can enter your property without permission. I suggest everyone puts up no trespass signs and to take away the obliged right to access then proceed to sue them into oblivion. Common Law rights are above all these muppets.
cataclysmic duckm said: “Local Governments lawfully do not exist ron.:
Correct.
Not lawful, but they do exist and have existed and operated for many years.
In fact they hold elections for them, we vote for them – we contract with them.
My point was / is, the corporate governments do not care if referendum(s) indicated that the people said NO to local government, they now exist, are in our faces and we have done exactly nothing about them.
Your comment: “What the Parliament cannot enforce the States and Territories cannot enforce.”
That is followed/ adhered to, “only” when/if the corporate governments feel like doing so.
Without going into any detail to show that all three levels of government, do in fact enforce their shonky (not lawful) legislation/laws, I will just say;
They are Corporate Governments, they have to answer to their corporations, not to the Australian people.
Is that not enough to have one believe that they should not be enforcing anything?
Unless / until the local (corporate) governments are removed, whether or not
they are lawful or can enforce any legislation /law, they will continue to do as they please.
Sure a win against them will be allowed (not often) from the corporate courts, part of the game plans – party politics.
Local Governments lawfully do not exist ron.
The last attempt by Parliament to make local government lawful was in the 1988 Referendum when Hawke offered the people,
‘Each State shall provide for the establishment and continuance of a system of local government, with local government bodies elected in accordance with the laws of a State and empowered to administer, and make by-laws for, their respective areas in accordance with the laws of the State.’
66% of Australian voters said NO to the offer of contract and all States or Territories had a majority NO vote to the offer.
What the Parliament cannot enforce the States and Territories cannot enforce.
That could turn in to a very big problem for the government in who they choose to Police everyone’s properties because unless the cultural inspector is of that tribal mob of that land their inspection would be seen as irrelevant as that person is not qualified to know the cultural significance of said tribal land unless that person can prove that they are actually an initiated member of that tribal mob of blackfella’s.
Thanks, Ron, but I did not come down in the last shower. See a couple of the articles I gave this publication-and I knackered the local council on a bike lanes contract they wanted to grant.
Those lanes would have affected over 50 businesses adversely.
So I held Geelong Council to their commercial liability and forced them to scrap the contract.
Here we go:
https://cairnsnews.org/2023/05/18/local-government-game-is-up-councils-are-businesses/
And about the Police, Ron:
https://cairnsnews.org/2021/08/27/victoria-police-now-independent-of-parliament-says-premier-andrews/
My effort with the council is unprecedented, I believe-I know of no-one who has done such a thing, and it affects every corporate council in this country.
More of the unproductive members of society demanding action for one of their brain farts born of irrelevance. They obstruct the productive members of society while benefitting from this very productivity. They sit on the sidelines like vultures looking out for the next opportunity to disrupt the success of others.
Theirs is an ideology of envy and failure.
Just another woke moron.
Bollocks, the only culture in Australia is in the yogurt.
Gary Oraniuk, said: “May I be so bold to suggest that no corporation (as is the case with your local council) has any jurisdiction over anyone’s private property?”
This is what has been going on for decades in Australia:
The federal and state governments and all government departments have been turned into corporations, not for the peoples benefit, instead, for the benefit of the corporations.
Local councils/shires are now local governments and are now also corporations, that answer to the dictates of the United Nations.
All done without the agreement of the people of Australia, All shonky not lawful, etc. And that is just some of the treason, fraud, etc.
The governments, courts, police, etc, do not care about “jurisdiction over anyone’s private property” Their shonky legislation means that they do whatever they choose to do.
Any problems – more shonky legislation or inventions, such as, the VOICE.
For decades we have allowed, and even supported what they have done, and we continue to let it happen.
Do we deserve to cop what they have done and continue to do?
I believe that we may well deserve to loose our governments, country, property and freedoms and rights, because we have done little to nothing to stop the rot.
We keep voting for the parasites. that then gives the shonky corporations calling themselves governments a contract between the people and the corporations. We keep saying more of the same, please.
So, are they stupid or are the brain dead, a/pathetic sheeple, the stupid ones?
If any person gets upset about what I have said here , good, about bloody time.
The “British Crown” is the “Crown Corporation(s)” that is commonly known as “The City of London”… a foreign gang of extortionists that own the parliament and impress the (abjectly compliant) Monarchy as their figurehead or mascot.
Our Constitution never mentions the “Crown” except in the “preamble” and some appendices that I would argue were not the Constitution approved by the Monarch and the people. In fact, a careful reading of section 44 clearly makes a distinction between the Monarch and other implied loyalties.
It may, or may not, be of interest to compare the Rothschild family crest (or Coat of Arms) to the “Crown” CoA. To a casual observer they’re practically indistinguishable.
May I be so bold to suggest that no corporation (as is the case with your local council) has any jurisdiction over anyone’s private property?
Corporate jurisdiction can only be achieved via CONTRACT, so these aboriginal corporations do not have a LEGAL leg to stand on (but maybe one that could have a spear chucked through it?).
Furthermore, cultural heritage claims amount to hearsay, as the Australian Blackfellas have no written, documents history-it is an oral history, only, that they hand down.
This being so, an aboriginal henchman turning up to your property might be spinning you a yarn, but with no documented proof of such claim the result can only amount to blatant hearsay.
Essential to the problem is property knowing their rights, and the arguments-such as I have put here-applicable.
The last is the lack of ACONTRACT-no CONTRACT means no jurisdiction.
Well guess what… they can go screw themselves… GRRR.