Time to bring back Falcon that runs on sump oil and steam

Horvath Patents Allowed Engine To Run On Water Improved Electrolysis …
h ttps://www.energyscienceforum.com/forum/alternative-energy/water-fuel/74373-horvath…
I studied the Horvath Patents for a long time,way back, and understand the circuits. A duplication does not need a new cast carburetor and machined spoked electrodes as in Patent. The Electrical circuit is just a beefed up capacitor discharge ignition for MAIN POWER, with improved efficiency electrolysis for hydrogen and oxygen at 40 amps, 450 watts battery draw.

Stephen Horvath Hydrogen Patent + 1974 Ford Fairlane – overunity.com
https://overunity.com/9922/stephen-horvath-hydrogen-patent-1974-ford-fairlane
Re: Stephen Horvath Hydrogen Patent + 1974 Ford Fairlane. « Reply #1 on: November 05, 2010, 05:00:28 PM ». @all. This is Muon Catalysed Fusion as opposed to cold fusion. It. is already a technically accepted form of a nuclear reaction. Notes: A) I thought it was worked with standard hydrogen atoms rather.

Pat from Vic

But we’re not looking for alternatives to GEOLOGIC HYDROCARBONS in order to shift away from them to avert any BS “Climate Crisis”, we’re searching for alternatives because the GEOLOGIC HYDROCARBONS which we’d otherwise be perfectly happy to continue using are being BLOCKED and BANNED by the Globalist-owned power structures.

Alright Pat, Sorry. Haven’t missed your point this time – I admit I veered off topic on a different tangent to what was being proposed and the reasons discussed in the video and on this thread..
You’re right I now agree and I hope you’ll accept my apology.

Alan Vaughn said – “You’ve missed my point entirely.”

Au contraire, you point was plain enough the first time around.

And Valan Vaughn said – “… loony greenies who think they have the right to dictate how we live, want us to look for alternatives that will eliminate ‘fossil fuels’ which they say emit ‘dangerous’ CO2.”

But we’re not looking for alternatives to GEOLOGIC HYDROCARBONS in order to shift away from them to avert any BS “Climate Crisis”, we’re searching for alternatives because the GEOLOGIC HYDROCARBONS which we’d otherwise be perfectly happy to continue using are being BLOCKED and BANNED by the Globalist-owned power structures.

And the PROOF is in the PUDDING. If CO2 was an issue to any of us at all, then we’d be recoiling from ANY combustion-based technology, which is patently NOT THE CASE. The ONLY relevant difference is that those alternatives lend themselves to LOCAL manufacture, LOCAL sourcing and LOCAL control, and thereby INDEPENDENCE from the distributed manufacturing and energy supply chains which are so well engineered to HOBBLE and ENSLAVE us at the flick of an unelected beauracrat’s switch.

A large geomagnetic storm and it would be over rover… This not an if, its a when.. and there would be almost no warning..

https://www.astronomy.com/science/a-large-solar-storm-could-knock-out-the-internet-and-power-grid-an-electrical-engineer-explains-how/

Charlie Clelland – “Wood gas producers were used a lot during WW2 when petrol was unavailable…”

… and there’s the precise situation we’re exposed to going into the future, not necessarily due to war (although that remains a distinct possibility) but because we’re being targeted for progressive systematic deindustrialisation, economic destruction, impoverishment, starvation and ultimately extermination by a horde of genocidal Luciferian Globalists.

While most people understand that the Earth’s geologic hydrocarbon resources are for all practical purposes essentially unlimited. Not much good to us if we’re banned from using it as Australian government is now DOING, or denied access by manufactured scarcity. Same as the Australian moratorium on nuclear energy, where we have 40% of the world’s known Uranium reserves but export it to everyone else instead of using it ourselves.

Thanks for the compact summation of the respective technologies, BTW. Both with some drawbacks and bugs, but nothing that can’t be resolved by a determined and resourceful populace when the chips are down. A man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do, after all.

Wood Gas always seems to pop up in these discussions without any consideration of the reality of using wood fired gas producers. The reality is that wood gas producers use burning wood to cook wood in a reactor. The gas produced is very dirty and has to run through a set of filters before it is fed into an internal combustion engine. Wood gas producers were used a lot during WW2 when petrol was unavailable but the downsides of low performance and high maintenance to keep the thing running means it isn’t a viable competitor to liquid fuels.

Steam engines are quite efficient but the downside, and this killed them in the 1920s, was the heat up time for the boiler. A Stanley Steamer, popular pre-WW1, would take up to 20 minutes to come up to temperature. Steam engines are quite fussy about maintenance and running with clean water. And woe betide you if you forget to blow down the steam when you’ve finished running – the steam condenses and causes hydraulic locks in the cylinders which can destroy them.

Cars can run on water or etheric (or zero point) energy. But inventors who have proven that and tried to commercialise their inventions have either had their careers destroyed and scientific papers and prototypes seized like Nikola Tesla, been convicted on trumped up charges and been put in jail, or murdered to protect the industrialists wealth. And the globalist’s Net Zero goals state they want road use reduced to 60% of 2020 levels by 2050 through 15/20 minute geo-fenced Smart Cities, ULEZ cameras and reducing the size/weight of new EV’s to <1000kgs (ie: tiny cars). Welcome to 1984….for real.

Alan Vaughn said – “… anyone encouraging this stuff is in effect accepting and endorsing their fake narratives…”

Exactly 100% WRONG.

How is (for example) generating WOOD GAS to run engines by BURNING WOOD in any way complying with the BS “Climate Change” narrative? A practical and viable approach for which a vehicle need NEVER run out of fuel as long as there’s dead trees and fallen branches to be scavenged from the roadside.

How is (again for example) running automobiles on STEAM ENGINES driven by any of a potentially HUGE assortment COMBUSTIBLE FUELS in any way complying with the BS “Climate Change” narrative? With, BTW, SIMPLER and CHEAPER design, construction and maintenance than present internal combustion engines, and more complete and efficient combustion of fuels with CLEANER emissions (which has LITTLE IF ANYTHING TO DO with the so-called “Climate Change” BS)?

Discussions of these issues are relevant to establishing ENERGY OPTIONS and INDEPENDENCE from global cartels and genocidal Globalist-owned anti-Australian TRAITORS that presume to DICTATE our energy economy. Which is, just BTW, why such research and development never seems to go anywhere unless you DO IT YOURSELF.

It’s one thing to speak of a false “narrative”, but entirely another when the entrenched Globalist-controlled political and economic power structures ACTIVELY OBSTRUCT our access to cheap readily available energy resources, as is presently being done here in Australia with both GAS and COAL sourced energy (while we GIVE THE STUFF AWAY at dirt-cheap prices to EVERYONE ELSE on the PLANET).

And never mind the PERPETUAL PROHIBITION on Australian exploitation of NUCLEAR POWER, while we EXPORT all of THAT shit to the rest of the world too.

This is all very innovative and maybe even a viable alternative fuel for present day internal combustion engine driven vehicles, but why is any of this stuff necessary?
To me: anyone encouraging this stuff is in effect accepting and endorsing their fake narratives (the alleged ‘climate crisis’ in this instance) and is complying with their society-wrecking rules and dehumanizing mandates.
Discussing and promoting this ‘technology’ only validates their big lie about an alleged ‘climate crisis’ they insist we (humans) are responsible for, (without any solid evidence, scientific or otherwise, to corroborate the ridiculous claims), and that we must be punished for the damage we inflicted on poor ol’ Gaia. According to the delusional and psychotic green zealots who now believe they have the exclusive right to control the world: We humans, especially those of wealthy, industrialized Western society, are the equivalent of a rapidly spreading terminal disease or cancer that is attacking and killing Gaia, thus the cancer (humanity) must be removed before its too late.
It’s nonsense. ALL of it, so why is anyone seriously talking about complying with anything they say we should or must do?

This type of innovation and similar ‘alternatives’ they insist we must develop and use will only help to lower our standard of living – send us back to a lifestyle of hardship similar to, or worse than what our ancestors who lived in the preindustrial era, had to endure. And that of course is what the UN’s 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda and its 17 SDGs, ‘Net Zero’, Build Back Better, etc.. is really all about and hopes to achieve.. To uphold their climate crisis boondoggle narrative and all the tyrannical, insanely ridiculous rules they say we must obey in order to ‘save the planet’, when in reality, there’s nothing wrong with the planet. And even if there was: lowering our standard of living and forcing everyone too exist as enslaved inmates in dystopian authoritarian ruled SMART cities won’t help to mend or cure its ills anyway.
I say ignore it all. Rather than waste time on this stuff let’s expand what we have and what really works: We need to build more oil refineries and coal fired power stations, as our Chinese and Indian fellows are, but using OUR coal and LNG for fuel, while we aren’t allowed to use it to power our own advanced and once affluent industrialized society.
As I keep harping here and everywhere else I discuss this massive scam: the UNWEF misanthropic haters want to destroy our industrialized societies and enslave us all using this ‘climate crisis’ boondoggle they invented in 1970 with the help of The Club of Rome and meticulously planned over several decades, as a Trojan Horse to infiltrate our society and our lives, to ultimately control everything we do.

WAKE UP sheeple. This is just the same wicked agenda with the same anti-humanity goal as the COVID-19, WHO Pandemic Treaty and other similar hateful, Hegelian Dialectic agendas, they create and implement for the sole purpose of controlling, subjugating and imprisoning us all in their dystopian, clean & green, energy devoid totalitarian governed Brave New World.

I personally knew Ted and as far as engineers go he was one of the most delightful, in saying that, most of them are very un-delightful, Ted just about bankrupted himself on this thing but imagine how it would go as a hybrid nowadays, it had a double-acting v-twin so the amount of power strokes in each revolution was equal to a v8 but so compact and no cooling issues, he used to recall how he would go steaming up Wheeler’s Hill with no strain at all. The weakness in the design was that you had to warm it up for a minute or so which is why it would be best as a hybrid with electric transmission etc, and the other weakness is that it would be too cheap, too easy to fix and too reliable, rather like the Nissan e-Note hybrid, the most popular car in Japan, which dealers here do not want to import. Malaysia’s “Proton” cars should use this hybrid Pritchard idea because they have so much palm oil growing there, they should save their mineral oil for jet fuel.

Need we mention the concept of energy security and independence, folks?

Never was part of the Globalist agenda, nor of the multinational energy cartels that have the world by the throat.

Just BTW, there’s also the innovative wood-gas burning engines (carbon monoxide given off by an oxygen-throttled wood furnace, because as everyone should know, carbon monoxide is a flammable gas that can run any suitably tuned engine already fitted to run on LPG).

So many other perfectly viable options out there, folks.

It’s just that NONE of them are part of the “plan” – THEIR plan for US, which has a rather more TERMINAL objective than we might prefer.