Footage taken from helicopter proves Pentagon hit with a scud missile

If it was a plane there would be a few lamp posts knocked over.

I am reminded of a verse in a Simon and Garfunkel song, ‘The Boxer’ – “people see what they want to see and disregard the rest…”

I ask who has brought this topic up again at this time and why? Is there something else (big) going on now that we should be focusing on?

I have a feeling we in Australia are about to be hit with a double dissolution of Parliament. The Australian Parliament has at last taken an interest in the release of Julian Assange AND my neighbour informs me that Madeline King M.P. has an officer phoning people in constituency informing them of an upcoming tax reduction. Never heard of that before!

daviddd2 said – “… if they were told it was a pteradactyl they’d believe it…”

I’ve got a video somewhere around here of a clown on a Vespa hitting a brick wall.

Coulda been him wot dunnit.

By a process of elimination, fours hours after the second tower had fallen, I had worked out Israel dunnit; obviously, with CIA/White House complicity. This is like counting the dozens of footprints around the body. To me, the exciting thing is the Tatra 813 12-pot independent 8×8 (see cool demo photos). The ADF should be using these in the north. If so, I might steal one for my wilderness bolthole. Camou might be a problem though.

Terry Shulze said – a whole bunch of stuff about a great big commercial airliner flying into the Pentagon.

… and Terry Shulze also said – “Go back and look at the early pictures at the Pentagon. There is an jet engine sitting next to the hole in the Pentagon.”

And if we go back and look at the EARLIEST pictures of the Pentagon – before the laughably implausible props were wheeled in and dumped here and there on the pristine lawn and before the building collapsed around that teensy weensy missile hole in the wall, we see NOTHING AT ALL to support the notion of an aircraft impacting the Pentagon.

Even the windows IMMEDIATELY ABOVE AND EITHER SIDE of that teensy weensy little missile hole remained unbroken DESPITE a supposed AIRLINER smashing into the side of the building (and presumably PERPLEXINGLY leaving JUST that teensy weensy little hole in the wall while the airliner itself just “evaporated”).

That reporter on the scene got it right when he said there’s NOTHING to indicate that an aircraft hit the Pentagon, but it seems there are STILL some among us who can’t see past the Deep State BS.

Go back and look at the early pictures at the Pentagon. There is an jet engine sitting next to the hole in the Pentagon. I was on a forum where a bunch of former pilots and air frame and power plant mechanics were posting. One of the guys identified the engine, then tried to find something on the ‘net to confirm it. – Whoa! Pictures and manuals on the engine were being scrubbed off the ‘net at breakneck speed. He finally found a picture of the engine in an aircraft museum.

I forget the actual designation, but the engine was confirmed to being used on the 737-200. That engine is much smaller in diameter and longer in length than the later engines. – It would give greater ground clearance for the final run into the Pentagon.

Then, all of a sudden there was a push to say that it was a ‘Sky Raider’ that flew into the Pentagon. (The Sky Raider used the same engine) Nobody on our forum was buying the disinformation about a Sky Raider.

That was the Port side engine of the 737 that failed to penetrate the wall, the Starboard engine did penetrate, along with landing gear, tyre rims, etc. Lots of pictures of the mess inside.

Most of the actual aircraft disintegrated on impact into small pieces (an air craft is built of thin aluminum to be light). The pictures after the attack show men in suits going around picking up pieces of the aircraft. The largest I saw in the photos was around four foot across. It was painted up in American Airlines colors.

The impact scarring on the face of the Pentagon was consistent with the length of the 737’s wingspan, not the longer wingspan of the 757.

The face of the Pentagon also had the tell tale marks left by the fireball that rolled up the face of the Pentagon. Those black soot marks are common in virtually all aircraft crashes.

Some people claimed that the 737 couldn’t make that tight of a turn, the wing loading would be too great, it had to be a ‘missile’. Then someone produced the wing loading parameters for the 737. It was true that a loaded 737 couldn’t make that turn, but an unloaded 737 could easily make the turn.

There is an aircraft ‘boneyard’ in Arizona that has a lot of left over 737-200s available to be re-commissioned and repainted.

What hit the Pentagon is far less important than who authorized the strike!

” you might find this interesting … a scud missile launcher. Could this explain the horizontal trajectory?”

Only if the launcher was parked downhill. lol But what happened to the scud launcher? Disappeared into a hole together with the missile?

daviddd2 …. you might find this interesting … a scud missile launcher. Could this explain the horizontal trajectory?
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=scud+missile+launcher&mid=16553558B7B160379A0816553558B7B160379A08&FORM=VIRE

Harold Blake: “Bye the way the Gold and all the Debt records etc were in Building 7 which got frightened and just melted down through fear and anxiety ..”

I heard it was the Twin Towers that got frightened and melted down through fear and anxiety when they found out that Building 7 was going to be “pulled” because it was “dangerous”.

Hillary Clinton’s infamous line
‘What difference, at this point, does it make?’
Mwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-haaa
Americans still aren’t doing anything about the rolling series of coups since 1812 even though targets are clear
Here they are referred to as “Adams et al”
https://ralandbrunson.com/

When all the latest Tech porn is about iphone conversations being taken over by bots and misdirecting your millions into some W.Africa bank, the neuromanipulations of directed EMFs, the purposeful collapse of the world economics system and the furture
CBDCs then what use is this old “will never be exactly clear” what type of armanent blew out the the most relevant rooms for the expose of the NeoCons of the day.?
Bye the way the Gold and all the Debt records etc were in Building 7 which got frightened and just melted down through fear and anxiety ..
Guessing the next one as a takedown of the electrical grid to bring on the reneging of DEBT and the New Banking Order (The 2024 Debt Crisis as $10 Trillion Matures. Who will buy next ??)

Editor, cairnsnews said – “You should know we don’t post fake videos.”

Not even relevant. You or I could whip up a video of a missile zooming in to hit the Pentagon as easily as anyone else (kind of like all those NASA videos of stuff in space or on Mars or – dare we say it – the Moon… or perhaps like those airliners allegedly hitting the Twin Towers). Or we could fortuitously stumble upon genuine video footage of the actual attack, which might still be doubted or disputed.

Either way, it doesn’t have any bearing on the substantive facts of the matter. Those facts being that whatever hit the Pentagon made just a teensy weensy little hole, and there wasn’t any aircraft to be seen at all, not anywhere, by anyone.

Editor, cairnsnews also said – “We have seen the actual round hole left by the missile taken 30 minutes after it hit.”

I have images of the hole in the outer wall before the building collapsed, and of the neat circular hole punched through the interior C-Wing wall. Both compelling evidence of a cruise missile strike, and utterly debunking any suggestion that a Boeing 757 airliner crashed into the Pentagon.

Just so everyone knows, Scud missiles are big-ass BALLISTIC missiles. They come down on a target from ABOVE.

Whatever hit the Pentagon came in horizontally about 10 feet off the deck.

Yes, yes, I know, a pedantic detail. Just so we’re all clear, the narrator in the video clip apparently doesn’t actually know what a “Scud missile” is. The RELEVANT point is that the official story of a big old jet airliner hitting the Pentagon is a LIE.

And just BTW, IMO there’s a reasonable possibility that the video clip in question is fake. Either way, it doesn’t change the conclusive circumstantial evidence that no big passenger aircraft hit the Pentagon.

It may well have been a scud missile if, as reported, no aircraft parts were found. It therefore begs the question, what happened to the missing aircraft?