
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
SEVERAL sects within Orthodox Judaism warned their own people against the Zionism long before the formation of the modern state of Israel and continue to do so today – not that anyone of influence took much notice then or now.
But Jewish anti-Zionism is a historical fact, acknowledged even by various mainstream media. The Orthodox Jews believed that the push to set up the “Jewish homeland” violated their long-held teachings that such an event could only happen after the arrival of the Messiah.
Christianity, of course, arose through the life, death and resurrection in biblical Palestine of the most famous Judean in history, Jesus of Nazareth. But the Jews who were dispersed before and after the destruction of their 2nd Temple of Jerusalem in AD70 continued in their rabbinic teachings down through the centuries and refused to accept this, often to their own detriment, such as during their expulsions from Spain, Portugal, France and England.
This reality seems to fulfil what St Paul, the converted Pharisee, who agonized about his fellow Israelites in his letter to the Roman Christians: “Lest you be wise in your own sight, I do not want you to be unaware of this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in.”
The apostle, skilled in the Greek Socratic methods of argument, states further in the same passage “For just as you were at one time disobedient to God but now have received mercy because of their (the Jews’) disobedience, so they too have now been disobedient in order that by the mercy shown to you they also may now receive mercy.” (See Romans chapt 9-11)
These same chapters of Romans have been taken by the Christian Zionists as justification for their belief that modern Israel is equivalent to biblical Israel and that God’s prophetic plan was to bring Israel “back to the land” in the “last days” before the second coming of Christ. Israel, the state currently bombing the territory of Gaza into oblivion, is “the apple of God’s eye”, they will tell you.
One of the most notorious of the Christian Zionists, Pastor John Hagee of San Antonio, Texas, once described the Palestinians as “like catfish out of water”. In other words they had no place being there because God wanted these mostly non-indigenous people who call themselves Jews to live there. Again, the justification for this is the various Old Testament prophecies dealing with biblical Israel and their battles with various powers through the centuries.
Recently, with the outbreak of yet another Middle East war with Israel at the center, social media has been peppered with Christians posting maps of ancient Israel and its 12 tribal regions. The implied message is that Jews are the original inhabitants therefore they have a right to exclusive ownership and the Bible says so. But there are Christians who disagree strongly and refute these arguments, such as the Berean Bible Church.
So what has all of this got to do with Tommy Robinson? Well Tommy Robinson, the British nationalist, also strongly supports Israel in its war against the Palestinians. So does the British Nationalist Party and the UK Independence Party and most of the Conservatives and Labor party MPs. But one of the few voices of dissent, up until he died in 2017, was the House of Lords Jewish MP Gerald Kaufman, the former MP for Withington, Manchester.
Robinson, the BNP and UKIP are strongly anti-Marxist and anti-globalist and so are we here at Cairns News. But the irony of it is that Israel is a strongly Marxist-influenced state, noted for its agricultural communes (kitbutzim), abortion and anti-Christianity – except when it comes to all those American Christians who spend their money on Holy Land tours. But the Zionists like to have it both ways.
Worldwide, the various branches of militant Zionism such as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) have for many decades hectored non-Jewish populations about the dangers of the “far right” and their “racism”, reminding everyone, with monotonous regularity that the Jews are the primary victims of racism e.g. Nazis and the Holocaust, and any hint of racism, such as opposition to multiculturalism and mass immigation, is evil.
How ironic, again, that Israel is an exclusively Jewish state, based on the idea that a certain religious group should have complete control of a nation. It’s just another version of the exclusive Islamic states of Saudi Arabia and Iran. It is also a type of racism that stems from hateful Jewish supremacist writings in the Talmud that equate Gentiles to animals.
An English supporter of Palestine, the rapper “Lowkey”, who hosts a podcast on MintPress News, has detailed the funding channels to right wing Jewish settler groups at the forefront of the gradual ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from Jerusalem and some 400 locations on the West Bank set up as Israeli “colonies” for more than half a million settlers and deemed illegal under international law.
He cites Roman Abramovich, the Russian Jewish billionaire who funnelled a tidy $100 million to Elad, a group that runs the City of David and purchases Palestinian homes in east Jerusalem; Haaretz News cites Elad donors as including “companies based in global tax shelters”; the Center for Security Policy led by Frank Gaffney and funded by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin; the Middle East Forum, led by Greg Roman, formerly of the Israeli Ministry of Defence. This organisation funded the Free Tommy Robinson campaign.
Lowkey says the Middle East Forum was “cited 13 times by Anders Breivik, following his massacre of over 70 people in Norway”. But wait, wasn’t it the Jewish defenders of Israel who warned us against these far-right extremists? We’ll leave that rabbit hole for now.
And then there’s the Hertog Foundation, who not only fund Elad but one of our favourite anti-woke crusaders Katie Hopkins and Tommy Robinson via the David Horowitz Freedom Center. Hertog Foundation also funds Friends of the IDF. A former board member of the latter, Robert Shillman, also funded Robinson, according to Lowkey.
So, says the UK Palestinian supporter Lowkey, “what we see here is an intertwining of interests between Zionist actors around the world who believe their interests are served by not only funding violent settlement in the West Bank and a war against indigenous Palestinian people, but also pushing domestic Islamophobia within Britain and the United States.”
Obviously these Zionist interests can see their own interests served by capturing, through generous funding, the likes of highly popular anti-establishment figures like Robinson and Hopkins. One would think they, like Alex Jones, had the intelligence to know the links between Zionism and globalism.
• Israel a Terror State – Erdogan – Mike Walsh (Europe Renaissance)
https://europerenaissance.com/2023/11/22/israel-a-terror-state-erdogan
Bit long Kev.Ed
Another correction to last post: should have typed A.D. 53, – not A.D 49 [too hasty].
PS.: As the brother of King Jesus of the House of David, James the Justus (the titular Joseph of Aramathea) assumed the role of regent to Jesus the younger until he reached the adult age of sixteen. At this juncture, his uncle and regent formally transferred his regal custodianship over to the rightful dynastic heir of the king.
The formal transference took place at the synagogue in Corinth in A.D. 53, where not only was Jesus the younger proclaimed Crown Prince Jesus of the Royal House of David, but at the same time, he was also presented with the priestly title of Chief Nazarite.
The destruction of the First Temple and the Jewish captivity of 536 B.C., brought about the last of the ‘reigning kings’ of the Royal House of David, namely, King Zerubbabel.
With the Israelites return to Judea, the Royal House of David could not re-assume their right to kingship, as during the interim, Judea had now come under the rulership of the Persian Empire.
At this point, the Royal House of David relocated to the Greek province of Galilee, where the royal family operated as the ‘Davidic kings in exile.’ The dynasty remained in Galilean exile until King Jesus of the Royal House of David attempted to reclaim the dynasty’s rightful place on the throne of Jerusalem according to Jewish custom.
This was no different to the exiled Stuart dynasty, the current Tibetan Government in exile, etc.
…..
PS.: correction to my earlier post. Re. ‘James the Justus,’ – I should have typed ‘Jesus the Justus.’
Jesus’s brother James was originally titled ‘James the Justus,’ but in A.D. 49, upon reaching his sixteenth birthday, the title was formally transferred to the young Crown Prince Jesus, ie., Jesus the younger, where according to dynastic Messianic custom, the young Davidic prince now became known as ‘Jesus the Justus’ (Righteous).
This was merely a standard procedure in the formal transference of titular dynastic rank.
Israeli forces withdraw from Al-Shifa having not found any weapons
19h ago
https://uprootedpalestinians.wordpress.com/2023/11/16/israeli-forces-withdraw-from-al-shifa-having-not-found-any-weapons/
Jesus was not a Judean
“Christianity, of course, arose through the life, death and resurrection in biblical Palestine of the most famous Judean in history, Jesus of Nazareth.”
Nazareth was in Galilee – not Judea. Galilee was reached from Judea by passing through Samaria
God’s Promise to Ishmael, part 1
https://godskingdom.org/blog/2023/11/gods-promise-to-ishmael-part-1/
Blog Series – The Promise of God to Ishmael
Preface
The Bible gives us the origins of nations that have affected their subsequent history, in some cases, for thousands of years. This is a short study of the biblical history of modern Arabic people. I write from a biblical perspective, though not necessarily from a Christian perspective. Christians are often as ignorant of the Bible as are non-Christians. For this reason, many of the things in this study will differ from mainstream Christian thought.
As the author, I am not subject to any particular Christian denomination or church. My loyalty is to Jesus Christ alone. I also believe that as far as is possible, we ought to be at peace with all men. Therefore, while I have opinions that differ from other teachers, I believe it is healthy to exchange ideas and to examine the premises that support our conclusions.
I have not found anything in Christian teachings that explain properly the promises that God made with Hagar, the mother of Ishmael. Almost all the focus has been on Isaac, who was Ishmael’s half-brother. Yet to truly understand the promise to either son, one must know the promise to the other son. Each provides context and contrast to the other.
As I will show in this short book, the Bible (and biblical law itself) shows that the land originally called Canaan was given to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. However, their corruption and worship of false gods caused God to disinherit them and to exile them to Assyria, where they were known by other names, such as Gimirri and Saka. The name changes contributed toward their disappearance from history.
Isaac’s disinheritance meant that the land reverted to the second in line to inherit the land. This was Isaac’s brother, Ishmael, the father of the Arabs. The Zionists who currently occupy the land base their claim on their genealogy back to Judah, but, as we will see, Judah was not allowed to return to that land without first repenting of their hostility to God. They returned under the banner of Edom, which Judah had conquered and absorbed in 126 B.C.
Edom was the nation founded by Esau, Jacob’s brother. They were born in the next generation after Isaac and Ishmael, and hence, Edom stood third in line as the inheritor of the land. The Jews claim to be from Jacob, who had been given the name Israel. But this is not true, as I showed in my book, Origins of Zionism. Zionism is the fulfillment of prophecy regarding Esau, not Jacob.
The bottom line is that Ishmael (Arabs) hold the long-term title deed to the entire land of Palestine. In this short booklet, I will explain in greater detail the promises God gave to Ishmael.
Read on –
Re: Shasu,
The Soleb Temple (Sudan) dated to ca. 1400 B.C., preserves the earliest known reference to Yahweh: ie., – ‘The land of [the] Shasu of Yahweh.’
This was inscribed around a century prior to Akhenaton/Moses’s adoption of the Yahweh cult in ca. 1333 B.C., as correctly preserved within the non-canonical Book of Jasher.
Correct Brian.
Jesus of the Nazorites.
Most archaeologists agree that its etremely doubtful that the village of Nazareth even existed in Jesus’s time.
The term Nazareth was actually a later corruption of Nazarene, – as in Jesus of the Nazarenes, not Jesus of Nazareth.
The historical Jesus was a known member of this Jewish liberal sect, which amalgamated elements of Essene Judaism, Buddhism and Hellenistic thought. hence, it’s various appellation as Hellenist-Judaism.
All of this became totally obvious with the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls,
Despite its corruption, this can also be verified in the NT itself, where all of the pivotal aspects of Jesus’s biography, conform precisely to set rules of the Essene codes of life, and especially, the supremely important events of Cana, Bethany and the strict laws surrounding the associated ‘times of the restitution,’ which conform precisely to Essene Messianic law as detailed by Flavious Josephus.
Whilst the believers continue in their beliefs, that the ‘angels’ surrounding Jesus at the post-crucifixion family sepulchre were ethereal beings, the reality is quite different, as confirmed in the Book of Enoch. According this important non-canonical work, the hierarchies of angels were nothing more than Essene terms for their hierarchy of priestly ranks, whereas the ‘Kingdom of Heaven’ was the contemporary Essene cryptic code for the High Monastery of Mird by the Dead Sea.
At the time, Jesus’s unprecedented status remained unique, insofar as being not only the contemporary anointed dynastic king (messiah) of the Royal House of David, which was fully confirmed in the events of Cana and Bethany, but unlike previous kings, Jesus’s unequalled position rested upon his additional initiation into the Order of Melchizedek (St. Michael of Zadok) (Hebrews. 6: 20). It was due to this unique divergence from custom, that ancient Judaic law had to changed through which to accommodate Jesus’s unprecedented status as both dynastic King (House of David) and initiated High Priest (Order of Melchizedek): ie., – there was ‘made of necessity a change also of the [Judaic] law’ (Hebrews. 7: 12).
Within the figurative language of the NT, Jesus’s elevation to the priesthood was described as the Ascension.
It was for reason, why JC could openly challenged the Aaronite priestly establishment with a new spiritual message based upon the royal Davidic tradition combined with the more spiritual Nazarene Church of Judaism
If anyone knows the details of the ancient history of Britain, they will fully understand, that following the crucifixion in AD 33, it was the brother of Jesus, James, whose spiritual title was Joseph of Aramathea (ie., ‘ha Rama Theo, or Divine Highness’), who had been entrusted with the re-establishment of Jesus’s Nazorite Church within Ireland and England. This was the Celtic Church, founded by James in AD 37.
Despite what the big churches say, both Eastern Orthodox and Western Catholic, and the myriad of American sects, the authentic Church of Jesus, as descended from his blood relatives, namely, his brother James, James the Justus, Joseph [junior], probably Tamar?, and Mary Magdalene, etc, always was the Celtic Church.
Why do you think there has been a millennia old European war against this dynastic and spiritual legacy?
This Tony guy gets a lot wrong
It was not Jesus of Nazareth it was Jesus The Nazarene.
The Old Testament is not about the Jews rather the Israelites
Jews is an interpolation.
Nebuchadnezzar carried the Israelites off to Babylon circa 590 BC
Cyrus allowed Israelites to return home circa 530 BC
I will read the full post later and am sure I will find more faults
Yet no mention of the Shasu?
The Shasu possess the earliest known prototype of the YHWH principal, and later intermarried with the Habiru.
Who is an Israelite?
In view of Israel’s dispersion, Paul brings up a critical point in Romans 9:6-8,
6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are from Israel; 7 neither are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but “Through Isaac your descendants will be named.” 8 That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants.
God’s promises to Israel have not failed, even though Israel was divorced, cast off, and lost. God promised to remarry Israel, and He will. However, He will not marry a carnal people. Just because one is descended from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob-Israel does not make one an Israelite. “They are not all Israel who are from Israel.” As we have seen already, the name of Israel was taken away from them, and the only way they may regain that title-name is to come into the adoption of sons, the huiothesia, “Son Placement.”
In other words, only Christian believers among those ex-Israelites of the dispersion are eligible to be called by the name Israel. God stripped that name from them years ago because of their unbelief and idolatry—in effect, for rejecting Jesus, the God of Israel. And so the term Israel is no longer applicable in the same national sense that it was used in the Old Testament. The name will be applied more specifically to those whose character reflects the meaning of the name. The name means “God rules.” It is a name that signifies a person’s testimony to the sovereignty of God. Any natural Israelite who continues to reject Jesus Christ is not an Israelite at all in the sight of God.
Paul also brings up Hosea’s prophecy to Israel. Romans 9:24-26 says,
24 Even us, whom He also called, not from among the Jews only, but also from among Gentiles [Greek: ethnos, “the nations”]. 25 As He says also in Hosea, “I will call those who were not My people, ‘My people’, and her who was not beloved, ‘Beloved’. 26 And it shall be that in the place where it was said to them, ‘You are not My people,’ there they shall be called sons of the living God.”
In that Hosea’s prophecies were directed toward Israel, and not Judah, it is plain that Paul was not speaking of the Jews. The only way one can apply this to the Jews is if we first assume that Judah and Israel were the same nation and then extend this to mean that the Jews are Israel. But as we have already shown, this is not historically accurate.
“……….., The only true Israelites are the overcomers. These are the ones who will be entrusted to rule in His Kingdom during the thousand-year Messianic Age. These are not a people of privilege who can sin with immunity. These are people who—like Jacob himself—have been disciplined and trained to have the character of Jesus Christ. They will then teach others by example how to become true Israelites.
Verse 7 concludes,
7 What then? That which Israel is seeking for, it has not obtained, but those who were chosen [exloge, “the elected ones,”] obtained it, and the rest were hardened.
Paul then goes on to show that Israel’s fall was for the benefit of the world. Even those idolatrous Israelites, who died apart from Christ, will ultimately come into the knowledge of Jesus Christ. They will not inherit the first resurrection that is reserved for the overcoming remnant. Nevertheless, they will be part of “the reconciliation of the world” (Rom. 11:15). God locked them up in disobedience so that He might have mercy upon all (Rom. 11:32). But that is a subject covered in other books and is too lengthy for this study of Who is an Israelite?.
The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof ” [Matthew 21:43]
h ttp://gods-kingdom-ministries.net/daily-weblogs/2014/11-2014/the-looming-controversy/
h ttp://gods-kingdom-ministries.net/teachings/books/who-is-an-israelite/chapter-5-israel-in-romans-9-11/
BRIEF HISTORY OF CANAAN
.
(700-100B.C.)
.
By Mike Green
.
We can only begin to understand the society that existed in the land of Canaan in the Lord Jesus’s day if we understand what took place there during the several hundred years leading up to His arrival. The following is a very brief summary of the history of Canaan circa. 700-100 B.C.
.
Samaria
.
When the House of Israel and some 200,000 of the House of Judah were taken captive to Assyria (beginning circa. 724 B.C.), the Assyrians brought all manner of foreign tribes in to occupy the land of Samaria:
.
‘‘And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel: and they possessed Samaria, and dwelt in the cities thereof. “ (II Kings 17:24)
.
This was to prevent the House of Israel from returning to Samaria, and they never did. These foreign tribes intermarried with most of what few members of the House of Israel were left in the land (the berries on the uppermost branches etc, Isaiah 17:6) and became known as the Samaritans.
.
Judaea
.
Following the removal of the remainder of the House of Judah by the Babylonians (beginning circa. 586 B.C.), the Edomites, who had actually assisted the Babylonians in capturing the Judahites, moved in to occupy the land of Judah, later known as Judaea, as did many other Canaanite tribes:
.
“After this {the Babylonian deportation of the remnant of the House of Judah} they {the Edomites} settled in southern Palestine {Judaea }, and for more than four centuries continued to prosper.” (Smith’s Bible Dictionary, under ” Edom or Idumaea”)
.
“The Edomites pressed into the now empty lands in the South of Judah [ Judaea ] “ (International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia, under ” Edom ; Edomites”)
.
The Return from Exile
.
Ezra tells us that only a tiny remnant of the House of Judah [Jerusalem], less than 43,000, returned to Canaan following their 70 years in captivity in Babylon . That is less than one per cent of the total number of Israelites taken away captive (some six to nine million based on the number of fighting men). They were members of the tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi.
.
When this tiny band of Judahites arrived in Judaea they found it to be a very different place to that which they had left 70 years before. Ezra tells us that the returning Judahites were initially living in fear because of all the foreign peoples that were now living in Judaea, and even lists them for us (note that Esau, the twin brother of Jacob-Israel, had joined himself through marriage to the Canaanites and Hittites, among others):
.
”And when the seventh month was come, and the children of Israel were in the cities, the people gathered themselves together as one man to Jerusalem …And they set the altar upon his bases; for fear was upon them because of the people of those countries.” (Ezra 3: 1 ,3, KJV)
.
“Now when these things were done, the princes came to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests, and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the people of the lands, doing according to their abominations, even of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites. ” (Ezra 9:1, KJV)
.
There was so little room in Judaea that most of the Benjaminites among the returning Judahites had to leap-frog Samaria, which was also full of foreign tribes, and settle in the land of Galilee which was largely unoccupied at that time.
.
The Conversion
.
In 126 B.C. John Hyrcanus II, the last true Judahite heir to the throne of Judah in Canaan, defeated the Edomites militarily. Hyrcanus ordered that all Edomites in Judaea and Idumaea (Edom) circumcise themselves and convert to Hebrewism, the Israelite religion. The Edomites complied, and from that time on they became part of the nation of Judah :”… during the warlike rule of the Maccabees they {the Edomites} were again completely subdued, and even forced to conform to Jewish laws and rites, and submit to the government of Jewish prefects. The Edomites were now incorporated with the Jewish nation. ” (Smith’s Bible Dictionary, under “Edom, ldumaea or Idumea”)
.
“Hyrcanus took also Dora and Marissa, cities of ldumea, and subdued all the ldumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews… they were hereafter no other than Jews. ” (Judahite historian Flavius Josephus:Antiquities of the Jews, Book XIII, Chapter IX, sec. I )
.
Although known from this time on as “Judah” by name, these Edomite converts remained very much Edomites by race.
.
The Usurping
.
The forced conversion of the Edomites was a disastrous decision for the House of Judah. The Edomite governor, Antipater the Idumaean, became procurator of Judaea, Galilee and Samaria.
.
Through collusion with the Romans he arranged for his Edomite son, Herod the Great, to usurp the throne of Judah. Herod assassinated John Hyrcanus II , killed all of the Levitical priests bar one, rebuilt the Temple according to his own ( not God’s) requirements and specifications and appointed his Edomite brethren into the Sanhedrin and the newly instigated sects known as the Pharisees and Sadducees:
.
“In 126 B.C the country was subdued by John Hyrcanus, who compelled the people to become Jews and to submit to circumcision. Antipater, governor of ldumaea, was made procurator of Judcea, Samaria and Galilee by Julius Caesar. He paved the way to the throne for his son Herod the Great. With the fall of Judah under the Romans [ 70 A .D . ] , ldumaea disappears from history.”(International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia, under “Edom; Edomites”)
.
“For there are three philosophical sects among the Jews. The followers of the first of which are the Pharisees; of the second, the Sadducees; and the third sect… are called Essenes. These last are Jews [properly “of Judah”] by birth, and seem to have a greater affection for one another than the other sects have.” (Flavius Josephus, The War Of The Jews, Book II, Chapter VIII, Sec. 2)
.
[ Note: Not all of the Pharisees were Edomites. For example, the apostle Paul was a Pharisee, although he was an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin. Nicodemus is another possible exception.]
.
The Supplanting of Hebrewism
.
The Edomite Pharisees, now in control of the Temple, began teaching a new, Babylonian based religion known as Pharisaism which replaced Hebrewism, the true Israelite religion of the Old Testament Israelites as instituted by God and administered by the Levitical priesthood in accordance with His will:
.
“With the destruction of the Temple (A.D. 70) the Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees. Henceforth, Jewish life was regulated by the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of tradition supplanted the older priestly tradition.
.
Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future. ” (The Jewish Encyclopaedia, 1905, under “Pharisees”)
.
This new religion of Pharisaism was later written down in the Babylonian Talmud and became known as Judaism long after the New Testament was written (there was no such thing as Judaism in Biblical times).
.
The Result
.
By the time Jesus Christ appeared on the scene, the Edomite usurpers had control of the land, the throne, the Temple and the religion of Judah. This was in confirmation of the prophesy spoken by Isaac, Esau’s father, before He died. Esau was mourning the loss of the birthright promises and blessings that had been his, but which he had sold to his younger brother Jacob for a bowl of lentils. In comforting his favourite son, Isaac said:
.
”And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother [Jacob-Israel]; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion [the Kingdom], that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck .” (Genesis 27:40)
.
The Jews are of Esau from Idumea, and therefore not of Israel or Judah; Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925, vol. 5, page 41.
.
The fact that Esau-Edom had indeed usurped the Kingdom is confirmed by the words of the Lord Jesus Christ when He said to the Jews:
.
“Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. “ (Matthew 21:43, KJV)
.
http://ensignmessage.com/articles/brief-history-of-canaan-700-100b-c/
Lest we also forget, prior to concluding, that Netanyahu once described America in rather stark, hideously arrogant terms,
h ttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/netanyahu-in-2001-america_n_649427
“I know what America is. America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction. They won’t get in their way.”
Moreover, he labeled “Christian” Zionists — you know, the types who worship ‘Israel’ more than the figure their religion is centered around — as, “scum.
h ttps://americanfreepress.net/let-us-prey/
Non-Jewish inhabitants of the Holy Land region call themselves Palestinians. As far as we know the Romans used the name and so did the British some 1900 years later. Old maps will show the wider area as Palestina, which incorporates the biblical regions of the 12 tribes of Israel. The British also used the term Palestinian Mandate.
CC767:
• The Myth Of Judeo-Christian – By Brother Nathanael
https://www.biblewithbrother.com/?p=277
“As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism BECAUSE IT REJECTS CHRISTIANITY; and Christianity is Christianity BECAUSE IT REJECTS JUDAISM. What is usually referred to as the JEWISH- CHRISTIAN TRADITIONS EXISTS ONLY IN CHRISTIAN OR SECULARIST FANTASY.”—- 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/chapt05.html
Jews hate Christ, a descendant of Shem in the flesh, therefore the Jews who are of the Synagogue of Satan are anti-Semitic.
Some valid insights from Paul Golding of Britain First, concerning the announcement of a new British political party: the Party of Islam.
He makes some valid points, which will probably turn out correct, notably, that this in itself, will collapse the Left wing Labour Party as Muslim voters jettison Labour in their millions.
Bring it on he says, – this should serve as a serious reality check to the average BBC addict.
https://www.britainfirst.org/video_the_party_of_islam_my_thoughts_by_paul_golding
Nick said – “… your last post & previous ones are anti-sematic…”
Let’s take a blind stab in the dark here, I’m guessing you live according to “Judeo-Christian” values. You know, those allegedly “Christian” Zionists who say the Jews really ARE the Master Race and are fully entitled to exterminate eight billion Goyim (which incidentally includes YOU) because they say God said so.
Those same Zionist Jews who are impatiently waiting for THEIR “Christ” to arrive and rule the world with an iron fist – who would be the “ANTI-Christ” according to genuine Christian tradition. Which would seem to cast “Judeo-Christians” as “ANTI-Christians”, hence they ACTUALLY worship Lucifer, not Jesus Christ.
Perhaps not – what would I know? – but if so, then good luck with that. Mind the sub-zero temperatures, rarified air, aircraft traffic and migrating birds when the “Rapture” hits you.
In any case, call anyone you want “anti-sematic” or whatever other BS you like, that nasty little genocidal Nazi state that likes to call itself “Israel” MASS MURDERING a CAPTIVE population of millions of men, women and children is STILL NOT OK. And if you like understatements, there’s a doozy for you.
As for British politics, the rot is too deep, the traitors have installed their race and hate laws, – so opposition parties must accept this and work around it.
Through this means, they get ‘their people’ into the opposition group, and thereby, – destroy their challengers in the bud.
At the moment, Britain First is probably the best party, but for obvious reasons, it’s never going to be a dominant party, – but that’s not the aim.
Everywhere the BF ‘Battle Bus’ goes [great political tactic by the way, – get one going in your area!, it’s cheap and effective, – no excuses!] the common people salute and give the thumbs up. At I write, BF are putting a London candidate up against the former Islamic terrorist lawyer, Sadiq Khan: that will be interesting.
As for Robinson, people must first understand the Luton problem, where he’s from, that was always his primary issue. The Zionists merely jumped upon his story to further their own agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YQ94jFg_4A
It was the Zionists who deliberately imported ‘violent Muslim extremists’ into Europe, knowing they would start trouble, cause a local nationalist backlash, and a demand for their removal, etc. The Zionists could then say, – well now you know how we feel, – and we also have the right to evict these people from our land.
Big clever.
It’s a game and time is running out.
Nick: “you views in your last post & previous ones are anti-sematic”
Newsflash for you, Nick. Most modern day Palestinians are Semites. But most modern day Israelis are not Semites.
As Lenin might have said… Learn, learn and learn. It’s the only antidote to brainwashing and ignorance. Apart from subscribing to CN and its eclectic comment section. 🙂
Phillip O’Sullivan: ” It is Palestine, everywhere else is Judah, Samaria, Israel, phonecia or Lebanon.”
You obviously know jack sht about Canaan and the Hittite Jebusite dynasties of Urusalim (Jerusalem) who disagree with you. They’ve wanted Urusalim back ever since Joshua and in the end his successor David finally ripped it off them.
The poor Anatolian Hittites in Canaan did worse than the Palestinians are currently doing. They got wiped out, literally. Save the BS for those who know nothing.
Nick, please explain the basis for your racist supremacism and hatred for Eskimos in 25 words or less.
• “Anti-semitic, it’s a trick we always use it” – Former Israeli Minister Shulamit Aloni
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0kWAqZxJVE
And you are so full of hite you can’t even spell it ….
Hi Nick we don’t remember expressing any views on the Gaza conflict either way. Editor
Dear editor. We have enjoyed many of your posts during “Covid”, but just unsubscribed because you views in your last post & previous ones are anti-sematic, even though you might come across having some sort of Christianity in you, your views on this subject are not based on the correct Biblical & Historical views. Wish you well & hope you give this some thought & consideration
We have another twit talking about a place that does not exist, except in a Roman military map. There is no such place as Palestine. Except in a small strip called phillistia, Gaza Strip. It is Palestine, everywhere else is Judah, Samaria, Israel, phonecia or Lebanon. Jordan, Syria. Judah, Samaria, Israel are not, and never have been Palestine. Further, Zionism is simply wanting Israel’s stolen ancient lands back. Which includes Jerusalem, I say free the Israelis , from 2500 yrs of being butchered, dispossessed, enslaved, and give them back there tiny piece of land known as Israel 2900 yrs ago.
Capitalism v Communism = Global Totalitarianism
An example of the Hegelian Dialectic as described in the Protocols of the Elders of Sion… A “forgery” of a perhaps prescient, allegedly “anti-semitic” document of unknown origin some 100 plus years ago.
Possession of it in Stalin’s Soviet Union was punishable by DEATH. Not surprising, given that it purported to reveal the source and real purpose of “communism”.
Otherwise, it makes Machiavelli’s masterpiece on “statecraft”, “The Prince”, read like novice kindergarten material.