Katters Australian Party warns all fishing, farming and coal mining will cease throughout Great Barrier Reef and Gulf catchments by 2027
A leaked letter outlining the Commonwealth Labor Government’s plans to hang Australia farmers, fishermen and battlers out to dry in order to appease international elites has been described as the “blueprint for regional destruction” by furious North Queensland-based MPs.
The letter, authored by Federal Environment and Water Minister Tanya Plibersek to UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay on 25 May 2023, describes in detail a suite of new water quality, fisheries and climate change measures being pursued by Labor in response to UNESCO’s Reactive Monitoring Mission to the Great Barrier Reef report.
Cape York Peninsula will be nominated by Qld Labor for World Heritage listing ready for Qld state election in 2024
In her letter, Minister Plibersek writes that the Commonwealth Government had “worked closely with the World Heritage Centre to ensure these actions meet your expectations and address the recommendations of the Mission report”.
Among these measures are promises to UNESCO to:
- Enact, with immediate effect, a major shift in its water quality programs, specifically implementing:
- By 31 December 2023, a complete mapping of all priority areas of grazing land for gully repairs and associated restoration and remediation activities;
- By January 2024, double compliance activity being undertaken across the regulated reef catchment areas comparative to 2021 in order to enforce landholder compliance with reef protection regulated standards;
- By July 2024, expand the implementation of 2018 land clearing legislation and further strengthen protection to remnant and high value conservation areas;
- By February 2025, accelerate progress to achieve all water quality targets through a program of sediment, nutrient and pesticide reduction through combined efforts in regulation, incentives and accelerated landscape restoration programs (e.g. a further 32.3% reduction in dissolved inorganic nitrogen loads).
- Completely restructure access to fisheries in and around the Reef, specifically:
- By 31 December 2023, establishing a complete net-free zone in the North third of the property (Cape Bedford to the tip of the Cape York) and establishing additional net-free zones that expand net restrictions in the Gulf of Carpentaria so to “strengthen protections for threatened species that move between the GBR and the Gulf”;
- By 31 December 2023, finalising all harvest strategies with defined quotas for all key species and by 31 December 2027 working to achieve the target maximum economic yield of 60% biomass;
- By 31 December 2023, introduce legislation to mandate the use of Independent Data Validation on all commercial fishing vessels.
- By 30 June 2027, phasing out all gillnet fisheries to ensure the property as a whole will be gill-net free.
- Set successively more ambitious emissions reduction targets, reflecting the highest possible ambition, consistent with achieving net zero by 2050, by:
- Ensuring emissions reductions of 43 per cent by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2050;
- Continually increasing the Government’s climate ambition by working urgently to implement its substantial and rigorous suite of new policies to maximise their emissions impact and drive Australia’s transition to net zero;
- Increase Australia’s renewable electricity generation to 82 per cent by 2030;
- By 2035, ensuring Queensland has no regular reliance on coal for power production.
Katter’s Australian Party (KAP) Leader and Traeger MP Robbie Katter said the Minister and her Queensland counterparts’ agreement to UNESCO’s demands were a gross betrayal of the Australian people.
He said Australians would be outraged to learn that Labor had compromised national sovereignty and shamelessly handed over its political autonomy to a global authority that would never have to wear the consequences of the sweeping, and bizarre, policy changes.
“If you are in farming or fishing, and live in a regional or rural Queensland community, you should be deeply disturbed by the anti-future you have been relegated to in direct response to bullying by the Paris-based UNESCO,” he said.
“No Parisians will see their seafood communities closed, their farming operates rendered, or the use of their own natural resources to power their homes and businesses made illegal.
“It is the people of our communities, our state, who are the sacrificial lambs to this nonsensical obsession to ‘save the reef’, despite it boasting record high coral cover in recent years.
“Political heads need to roll over these decisions which have been deliberately concealed from the people it will actually affect.”
KAP Federal MP for Kennedy Bob Katter tabled the Federal Environment Minister’s letter to UNESCO in the Federal Parliament yesterday and called on her to explain its authenticity and motives.
He said among the many issues the agreements with the unelected international body posed, including the influence over sovereign governing capability, was the trespass of a foreign entity on Australian land.
“There’s no value in land ownership if you take away our rights to use the land,” Bob Katter said.
“The Magna Carta lays down clearly that my land is my land, not the government’s. The government has no right to set foot on my land.
“Now, here we have our land ownership being degraded to nothing.
“In this area is seven per cent of Australia’s fruit and vegetable manufacturing. We already import 12 per cent from overseas, so now we’re going to import one-fifth of our fruit and vegetables from overseas, are we? Is this a good outcome for Australia?”
KAP Deputy Leader and Hinchinbrook MP Nick Dametto said the Federal Environment Minister should be tried for treason after selling Australia out and sacrificing Australian industries to appease UNESCO.
“When the Federal Member for Kennedy took the Minister to task on this letter during parliament yesterday, the Minister stood there and preached about how proud of it she was as though the government had done Australia some great service,” he said.
“I don’t recall ever going to the polls and being asked whether or not I wanted to vote for UNESCO, so how is this international, bureaucratic body dictating to Australia how we manage our country?
“What this letter clearly sets out is a step-by-step plan by the State and Federal Governments to decimate large portions of Northern Queensland’s farming and fishing industries.
“Queenslanders who feed our nation demand that the State Premier denounce these plans. Though the big question still needs answering: did she know about this step-by-step plan all along and did she endorse it?
“The Premier must come clean with Queenslanders. Our rural communities rely heavily on these industries that are earmarked to be either outright banned or over-regulated to the point of becoming untenable.
“Our ag and fishing industries work hard to put food on our tables and they deserve to be represented by a Government that works to protect and support them, not one that casts them aside in the name of cheap, political point scoring in inner city Brisbane seats under threat by the Greens.”
KAP Hill MP Shane Knuth said a betrayal of the North Queensland people had been committed.
“Fishing, agriculture and mining are the backbone of our economy but are under constant attack from both our state and federal governments who will tell Queenslanders one thing then do completely the opposite behind closed doors,” he said.
“This is a clear betrayal of our fishermen by the Federal Minister who would prefer to bow down to the demands of UNESCO, instead of backing our own home-grown industries.”
Editor: The only way to save regional Queensland is for KAP and One Nation to amalgamate, forming a new conservative party. Holding the balance of power is a farce and will not assist Queensland industries in fighting off Labor treachery by its adherence to UN policies. Those who visit the Reef on a daily basis and reef researcher Professor Peter Ridd have told us there is nothing wrong with the Great Barrier Reef. Remember, the Voice referendum was UN policy. The Federal Health Minister in May 2024 will decide if Australia hands over its health autonomy to the WHO.
NEVER EVER TRUST LABOR THEY ARE COMMUNISTS AND BULLYS..
There can only be one lawgiver – “For there is no authority if not from god”
Paul the apostle to the Romans – Romans 13:1-2
A translation of my Greek interlinear provided this –
“Every soul to authorities higher be subject to. For there is no authority if not from god, but the existing authorities under Me having been ordained (by me) are. So the one resisting the authority of his God has opposed and those having opposed to themselves judgement will receive.”
Luke 11:28 – But he said, Yea rather, blessed [are] they that hear the word of God, and keep it. Acts 5:29 – Then Peter and the [other] apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
“…….Romans 13 is in play until the government, ruling class, authority over you, whatever you want to call it, decides that it is the final arbiter and sets itself up in the position reserved for God alone. When the state or the government moves to exclude God and to erect itself in that position, a Christian has an obligation before God to expose and resist evil.
Eph 5.11 have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. even if it means that resistance has consequences from those who assume power that you are resisting…………”
Genesis 1:1 is the beginning of Scripture and the foundation for all other revelation. It all begins with the statement that God is the Creator. This establishes not only His sovereignty but His right of ownership as the Creator. He has the right to do with His creation as He pleases. No other being has the right to tell Him what to do or to revise His plan according to his will.
Those who make such claims are trying to be gods in themselves, because they usurp the Creator’s right of ownership. However, God asserts that in reality “there is none else.” In fact, there can be only one sovereign God in the universe. All others have authority, which is delegated to lesser beings and which is to be used to further the will of the Sovereign.
Authority is never more powerful than the Sovereign Master who authorised it. Jesus said, “A slave is not greater than his master” (John 13:16).
https://godskingdom.org/blog/2020/10/isaiah-prophet-of-salvation-book-6-part-24
“There’s no value in land ownership if you take away our rights to use the land,” Bob Katter said.
“The Magna Carta lays down clearly that my land is my land, not the government’s. The government has no right to set foot on my land…………….”
On 24th August 1215 the Pope declared the Magna Carta null and void.
“…………Magna Carta – An Immediate Success…?
No. Not in the slightest.
Yes, King John agreed to the terms of Magna Carta, and yes, the barons renewed their oaths of allegiance to him. But the settlement did not last long. The security clause and the 25 barons of Magna Carta made it difficult for King John to wriggle out of the agreement as freely as he would have liked (for he had now given the royal seal of approval to a document that made him as susceptible to the law as any other ‘free man’), and he was much aggrieved by the manner in which Magna Carta had been enforced. And so he sought help from the Pope
Pope Innocent III
At the time, the pope was the official overlord of the kingdoms of England and Ireland. King John sent messengers to the Pope requesting that Magna Carta be annulled. In response, the barons did not give up the city of London, and vowed not to do so until the terms of the charter were implemented.
Pope Innocent III saw the Magna Carta from the king’s perspective, however, and was indeed very alarmed by the charter’s terms. On 24th August 1215 the pope issued the papal bull, a document in which he describes Magna Carta as “illegal, unjust, harmful to royal rights and shameful to the English people”. The papal bull declared Magna Carta “null and void of all validity for ever”………………..”
h ttp://www.magnacartatranslation.com/about-us/magna-carta/
By the terms of the “FOREVER” Treaty of 1213, the Vatican has since owned the Crown which it has rented to the British Monarchy per the terms of said Treaty, to wit:
h ttp://amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/123/211-the-secret-behind-secret-societies/
However the Crown is now a possession of the Jews –
It is not the Pope who wears the Crown today, it is the worshippers of the pagan god iconised as the Statue of Liberty.
In 1964 Pope Paul VI abandoned the tradition of wearing an ornate, bejeweled crown.
Beginning in the 8th century, the papal tiara — a jewel-encrusted, ornately decorated three-tiered, conical crown — was the symbol of papal authority. Worn by new popes on the occasion of their coronations and other solemn occasions, the headdress represented the Bishop of Rome’s ascendancy over earthly kings and queens……………….
After the announcement that the papal tiara would be sold at auction, Cardinal Francis Spellman of New York City arranged for the tiara to come to the United States, as a gift acknowledging the generous contributions by American Catholics to helping the world’s destitute.
Following a tour accross the country as part of an exhibition put on by Catholic Relief Services, the crown went to its permanent home where it is now on display in the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, DC…………
h ttps://aleteia.org/2018/08/19/the-day-the-pope-who-gave-up-his-papal-tiara-to-feed-the-poor/
In a blow to the globalist UN agenda, Canada’s oil and gas sector recently scored a huge win after the Supreme Court of Canada declared Trudeau’s government’s Impact Assessment Act, dubbed the “no-more pipelines” bill, is mostly “unconstitutional.”
Conservative Party of Canada MP Leslyn Lewis has endorsed an official House of Commons Petition demanding the nation’s federal government “urgently” withdraw from the United Nations and its subgroup, the World Health Organization (WHO), due to the organizations’ undermining of national “sovereignty” and the “personal autonomy” of citizens.
Early this year Lewis noted that the World Economic Forum (WEF) is “not our government” and that Canadians did not “sign up” to be attached to one of its charters. Lewis herself helped expose Canadians to the fact that Trudeau’s Liberal government signed onto the WEF charter in 2020.
The Petition calls out UN’s sex-ed programs, saying Canadians did not vote for these to be pushed on kids. The Lewis-backed petition states that Canada should have nothing to do with the UN’s sexual education programs as they have been pushed on the populace without the “consent” of the people.
The petition reads that Agenda 2030’s SDGs, as well as its “Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE)” program, its UN Judicial Review, and its International Health Regulations (IHR) are being “rapidly implemented,” with the absent awareness and “consent of the People or their elected representatives.”
The petition reads that SDGs have “negative impacts on potentially every aspect of life,” in Canada, including “religious and cultural values, familial relations, education, nutrition, child development, property rights, economic and agricultural productivity, transportation, travel, health, informed consent, privacy and physical autonomy.”
When it comes to the UN’s Comprehensive Sexuality Education, the petition states that publicly funded educational institutions have been “damaging children while concealing information from parents.” As a result, the CSE’s “normalization” of “sexual values and activities with regard to children are endorsed and enforced, beginning at birth.”
As for the WHO, it claims that the Comprehensive Sexuality Education gives kids “accurate, age-appropriate information,” however it then says sexual education should start at the age of 5 as per UN guidelines.
“Learning is incremental; what is taught at the earliest ages is very different from what is taught during puberty and adolescence,” reads the CSE.
A report called International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education which was published by the UN’s Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, in collaboration with the WHO, told kids aged 5 to 8 that “people can show love for other people through touching and intimacy.”
And these organisations are advancing Australia into the same sort of UN GLOBAL GOVERNANCE because “all” nations working on the program “will implement this plan”, from the top of the fake Corporate Federal Government to with its deceitful unconstitutional manipulation of the States and Local Government.
A National Cabinet = a National Government. It’s not the Commonwealth Constitutional Parliament. National Cabinet is under the National Federation Reform Council. This is not the Executive Council. The Labor Federal Government is acting as the UN does. Under PM Albanese it has an added First Secretaries Group. Our founding Commonwealth Constitution has been taken over by the Labor Party. The MPs must speak out.
So when do the Australian people get to have our own REFERENDOM on whether we want a corrupt CORPORATION running this country that we didnt have a say in or do we get back to being THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and our CONSTATUTION AS IT SHOULD BE . THESE CORRUPT GLOBALIST MUPPETS THAT CALL THEMSELVES OUR GOVERNMENT THEY HAVE TO GO . I was never asked were you people ENOUGH IS ENOUGH ITS ABOUT TIME THESE CORRUPT BASTARDS WERE TAKEN OUT THEY HAVE DESTROYED THIS COUNTRY AND KILLED ENOUGH AUSTRALIANS WITH THERE POISON JAB WHEN DOES IT END.
Yes, correct Bob Katter, UNESCO and all organs of the UN, want to rule the dictates of NATURE. But NATURE is resilient. UN preaches resilience but does not understand the resilience of NATURE. UN is just a big employment agency world-wide and it really is not necessary at all. It swallows up finances and produces nothing of value. Another false hope.
More from House debates
Tuesday, 17 October 2023
Bob Katter
….. we’re talking about land ownership. There’s no value in land ownership if you take away our rights to use the land. Now, they’ve already been taken away from the First Australians. They’re about to be taken away from everyone on the east coast of Queensland, so it’s very much to the heart of what we are talking about.
Now, here we have our land ownership being degraded to nothing. Some lady here in this parliament thinks she owns my land—’my’ being the million people that live along the North Queensland coastline from Bundaberg north. In this area is seven per cent of Australia’s fruit and vegetable manufacturing. We already import 12 per cent from overseas, so now we’re going to import one-fifth of our fruit and vegetables from overseas, are we? Is this a good outcome for Australia?
Let us turn to the Barrier Reef. Unlike people in this House—I doubt there are too many who have scuba dived on the Barrier Reef—most of my family have scuba dived there, some of them regularly. Most North Queenslanders scuba dive. We know the reef. We live by the reef. We love the reef, or we wouldn’t be living there. So who knows all about the reef? Who loves the reef? Who protects the reef? It is the people that live there, of course. I’m pleased that the minister is here to hear what I’m saying. If you say that there is a problem with the runoff, unlike other people in this place, I asked around and found a person who was described to me as the best reef scientist in the world. We share different views politically—we share most certainly different views on the environment! She would be regarded as a very, very strong environment. Two years ago, at our last long meeting, I said, ‘Are you reasonably comfortable with everything as it is now?’ and she said, ‘I would have to say yes, and I would say I’d like nitrogen to be a little bit less, but I wouldn’t like to have to defend that in the public arena.’
The minister is proposing—well, I don’t know if she is. A letter has been given to us. This is about what I moved in this resolution. Did it come from the minister? Is it a concocted letter? Did it have the authority of cabinet? Did it have the approval of cabinet or the party room when the letter was sent? These are questions that must be answered by the minister in this place.
I want to zero in on nitrogen. This scientist said: ‘The levels are acceptable, but I’d be a bit more comfortable if they were a little tiny bit less, but I couldn’t argue that point. If you’re asking me if I’m comfortable—yes, I’m comfortable with the current regime.’
What people in this place don’t understand, and what you must understand, is how NATURE works. You’ve got to be very careful here. If you stop the nitrogen run-off from going out onto the barrier reef and its environs, there is a result. It’s been going out for 200 years now, and if you stop it from going out then there are ramifications. Suddenly you’ve changed what’s going on with the barrier reef and its environments.
Let me be very specific. They did research on whether dugong numbers were going up or down, and the environmental movement came out and said, ‘There you go. The dugong numbers have dropped clean in half. Everything in North Queensland and everything in Central Queensland has got to be stopped because the dugong are dying.’
Well, no-one read the report. I’m one of these foolish people who read reports. I read the report and, of course, the environmental movement had, once again, flagrantly lied, as they lie again and again and again and again.
What had happened was that they quoted the dugong numbers in the southern half of the reef but not those in the northern half of the reef. In the southern half of the reef the dugong numbers had dropped in half and in the northern part of the reef the dugong numbers had doubled. Why did it occur? Because there’d been a huge drought in Central Queensland, there was no nitrogen run-off and the seagrass wasn’t being replenished by nitrogen, so the dugong had a choice of staying there and dying or moving north to where they could get a good feed. If you take the nitrogen away, it’ll be goodbye dugong, and it’ll be goodbye to a hell of a lot of other things as well, because, whether you like it or not, for 200 years that has been the way that nature has worked.
We are very, very disappointed. I’ve had very great respect for the minister, and I’ve said this on many occasions in this place. I greatly admire her very, very great depth of knowledge and understanding, but if that letter is authentic then this is very, very bad indeed not only for this place but for Australia.
openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2023-10-17.84.2
They are doing it again because we didn’t hang them last time!
If they are not charged with treason and convicted, defunded and executed, nothing will change.
I am very surprised at the number of flights from Australia to Guam!
Maybe there is hope?
Another one today – Virgin Military Charter 737 Max 8 (VH-8IC) ex Cairns.
For everyone’s attention. From OpenAustralia, please find below from Bob Katter:
House debates
Tuesday, 17 October 2023
Motions
Great Barrier Reef
Bob Katter (Kennedy, Katter’s Australian Party)
I move:
That so much of the standing and sessional orders be suspended as would prevent the Member for Kennedy from moving the following motion—That the House:
(1) notes the Minister for the Environment may have sent a letter “in camera”, on 25 May 2023, to the Director General of UNESCO, without public scrutiny;
(2) notes that this letter sets out in detail Reef and Gulf runoff regulatory impositions that will result in the closure of agriculture on Queensland’s Gulf and east coast;
(3) notes that if the proposals detailed in the letter received Governor in Council assent, they would shut down the commercial fishing, severely damage tourism, much of which is based upon recreational fishing and tourist access to the reef;
(4) notes that this mortal blow might also extend to the Northern cattle, sugar and banana industries;
(5) notes that the 2021-2022 annual report of coral reef condition, prepared by the Australian Institute of Marine Science, demonstrated that the Northern and Central regions of the Great Barrier Reef have the highest coral cover measured in 36 years of monitoring, the Southern section only declined slightly due to crown of thorns outbreaks;
(6) notes that given the excellent health of the reef there is no evidence that agricultural run off is affecting the reef and as such there is no justification for arbitrary regulatory impositions that will detrimentally affect the agriculture sector and broader community; and
(7) calls on the Minister for the Environment to:
(a) confirm the letter’s authenticity;
(b) provide advice as to who provided the authorization for the commitment given in the letter;
(c) specifically advise if the Cabinet was made aware of this letter and authorized its release;
(d) advise whether the Premier of Queensland was made aware of this letter and, if the Premier was not advised, acknowledge the serious breach of proper protocol; and
(e) acknowledge that the communication and commitments given were an unprecedented breach of Australian constitutional conventions.
openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2023-10-17.84.2
Bob Katter
“Political heads need to roll over these decisions which have been deliberately concealed from the people it will actually affect.”
Sounds much like the stuck record we keep hearing about the elusive ‘cure’ for cancer which the ‘experts’ promise is ‘just around the corner’, which I’ve been hearing my whole life of 65 years, and now regard the politically inspired and motivated rhetoric that it is, as mere meaningless background ‘hum’.
Same with this, it’s just standard issue government rhetoric,
I have a lot of time for Mr Katter, but at the end of the day, he’s no different. So tired of hearing and reading these hollow tidbits of hopium and nothing ever done to follow them up to make any of them happen…
All ‘sweet talk’. Noting more than mere background hum to keep the gullible, hoodwinked slaves under control.
I am convinced that the Federal Labor MPs are quite mad. Labor Environment and Water Minister Tanya Plibersek needs to wake up from her stupidity. For surely her letter to UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay on 25 May 2023 is evidence she has gone quite mad.
This Federal Labor government is working constantly to bring Australia back to its primitive beginnings. Eradicate people, eradicate their means of independent livelihoods. Surely this esoteric intellectual babble that began with ‘worship the earth’ has morphed into ‘save the world’ and the end of it will be dumbed down “men and women”, sitting down, cross legged, minds blanked, staring out at the created world, in total lostness of endeavour or initiative. Having no knowledge of the creator God who said to them, Be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moved upon the earth.
Australian Labor MPs are showing they are completely lost from real living. I can only conclude that God has described them so well in his incorruptible word: Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:
Oh the need for a sane mind: Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
This UNESCO agenda has Satan’s fingerprints all over it. Eradicate all knowledge of the living God and subdue his creation under the intellectual proud power elite who do not know how to govern, even themselves.
Did I mention female foxes are BITCHES?
And so is this treasonous pant-suit wearing dog dropping Tanya Plibersek (though she’s no fox).
Just one more sold-out Globalist whore destined to be serviced by a sturdy lamp post.
Alan Vaughn said – “… we would then have to organise our own PEOPLE’S bullhorn rather than take over the established infrastructure which belongs to us anyhow.”
I say do BOTH.
After we string all the treasonous arseholes up first, all nice and legal like.
Better to have a plethora of independent patriotic news services than to fall once more into the TRAP of vesting our faith in ONE SINGLE source of the “Truth”.
Seems to me that’s part of the pattern that’s gotten us into this mess in the first place.
jen said – “All freedom parties to unite…. not possible nobody wants to give up their POSITION…”
Well said.
That seems to be the problem. Too many cooks, as they say.
Not a card-carrying member myself, but in the wider context of our present circumstances, Australia One seems to be the ONLY crew that’s seriously knows what it’s doing and why. And they make no bones about refusing to “wheel & deal” with other political parties, apparently for good reason.
Even if all the little so-called “freedom parties” DID manage to put aside all their differences and present a united front, they’d STILL have the deck stacked against them because the corporate corruption in Globalist-owned clown-shows like the Australian Electoral Commission is SYSTEMIC to the core. These bastards make up their own rules as they go along, folks, ignoring the written playbook and doing WHATEVER it takes to deliver their REAL owners’ prescribed outcomes.
That’s what we get when we play in the Globalist sandpit. Like the chickens trying to “vote” at a foxes’ convention.
I agree with the author, though – Katter’s Australian Party and Pauline Hanson’s One Nation are probably the best picks to form a a coalition against the so-called “majors” – the best of an otherwise generally bad bunch? Lots of everyday Australians can relate to these iconic personalities, and the feeling is probably genuinely mutual. IMO Bob Katter is one of very few Australian politicians who’s worth listening to whenever he has something to say. Like hen’s teeth.
And zzz3856 said – “… and we must vote out the current duopoly government.”
Good luck with that. Like chickens trying to negotiate with foxes and outsmart them by playing along with their lying cheating corporate games where they write all the rules and make up new ones on the fly when the old ones don’t achieve their desired results, or otherwise just ignore ANY rules and do whatever the Hell they want, because who’s going to stop them?
I say we arm the chickens with torches and pitchforks and string the mongrel bitch foxes (yes, folks, female foxes, wolves, dogs and otters are all BITCHES) up to lamp posts. And cut their tails off first so they fit into standard orange jump suits. And anything else that gets in the way.
But even the chickens (hopefully) are smart enough to do everything all nice and legal like, with each fox getting their own personalised tribunal and a teddy bear before pulling the lever.
Maybe in the interests of doing it all in the best POSSIBLE taste, we can substitute the teddy bears with plush Basil Brush dolls. Whatever, just so long as the bastards swing.
Alan Vaughn: “We need a grassroots movement that will completely remove the ABC.”
That would be foolhardy, we would then have to organise our own PEOPLE’S bullhorn rather than take over the established infrastructure which belongs to us anyhow. Better put it to OUR good use than to the treacherous scum who run it.
Sadly, many Aussies will sit back and ‘let shite happen’, as long as it doesn’t affect them.
Woe betide someone who hurts them personally, whether it be in the hip pocket, their beloved footy and beer taken away, their freedom restricted etc.
If they wait too long, it will be too late!
They will lose their homes, businesses, loved ones, freedom…just like the last 3 years but far worse.
We were all personally affected by the false Covid vaccine WHO produced…are the apathetic ones going to sit and accept the next plandemic, which is moving towards us at a fast rate?
This plandemic will have mandatory jabs FOR ALL.
All our live cattle are going to be injected with mRNA…trials are being carried out now in NSW. Sheep, pigs, chickens are next.
Read WHO’s corruptive, evil plans in their Pandemic Treaty.
Our only way out of this mess is for the bigger minor parties TO UNITE and call a motion of NO CONFIDENCE in our government!
An election would see them sweep the corrupt out the door.
PLEASE, O.N…U.A.P……KATTER, ANYONE… can you forget your differences for the sake of Australia…you are our only hope of ridding ourselves of this filth?
RE All freedom parties to unite…. not possible nobody wants to give up their POSITION>BUT I would like to suggest to those same parties to on many subjects to give a combined Press conference with their respective MP OR leader… with it being shown to all Australians that there ARE politican’s that are speaking out against this madness, be it donations to the WHO, or Zero anything, and EV’s how mad is that just imagine all of our Ag and trucking industry on EV….MADNESS or good bribes, what has persuaded so many of Australian Peoples Representative to follow International Interests??? I thought we have a law that does not permit Australian Politicians, even after the leave Parliament to work for any business /Aus or International ???WHY or where are the judges that make this illigal or imo criminal behaviour and stop it,… NOW,.. In the Tas news they are now going even more green with building large parcel of wind mills,.. in the Bass straights??? Have they really worked out the damage they will cause??? Obviously not.. just following the psychopath’s again!!
All the freedom parties must unite to form one party for the good of all Australians… and we must vote out the current duopoly government. Lets drain the swamp!
daviddd2
We need a grassroots movement that will restore the ABC as a true, objective national broadcaster which can keep the bastards honest.
They’ve never been honest (at least in my lifetime) and is why I stopped watching their television and listening to their radio stations, reading any of their online content, years ago. That being the most effective way to deal with the disgraceful LYING national broadcaster it actually is.
However, it’s most unfortunate that the vast majority – the dumbed-down Oz public still believe the fake slogan: ‘ABC: Australia’s Most Trusted News Source’.
Therefore, only need to say this:
We need a grassroots movement that will completelyremove the ABC.
The global leeches need to shut the economy down for their ‘great reset’. In the eyes of the predator class it’s logical to destroy business and the value of land. All the parasites need is a pro-communist/fascist-leaning political party driven by greed and comprised up to the eyeballs. Labor has that in spades.
Last week Glencore announced it intends to close Mt Isa mines (produces some 4.5M oz/yr of silver). I wonder who, in about 10 or 20 years time, when the dust has settled from this controlled implosion of the economy, will pick up the asset/resources? What was once a resource of the Commonwealth is being transferred to bad actors. It’s called kleptocracy for a reason.
The NO referendum result has slowed the implosion down somewhat but the parasites are not yet where they belong.
Antony
The high treason exposed
Yes, exposed to one & all, but obviously everything’s A- okay: no one cares, no one will question it, or do anything about it so, let’s just continue voting for them, keep on complying with their diktats and soon we’ll all be free again.
Nothing to see here…
Australian politicians are now representing everybody’s interests and agendas except for the Aussies! That message is suppressed and hidden by the MSM in Australia.
We need a grassroots movement that will restore the ABC as a true, objective national broadcaster which can keep the bastards honest.
Without a national public voice we will remain a voice in the wilderness; not to mention fkd.
The high treason exposed
Good old Tanya….God condemn you sellout POS!!
lindesymondsI tried to ad to conversation but posts haven’t appeared. Genetically modified bananas, have your say
https://www.ogtr.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-09/dir199_invitation_to_comment.pdf
Who voted for that sour faced deplorable woman? However, this possibly ties in somewhat nicely with this which I think Lindesymonds may have brought to our attention a little while back. An invitation to comment on genetically modified bananas, Queensland bananas. Note closing date is 6 November.
“Invitation to comment on the proposed commercial release of genetically modified banana plants
Application for cultivation of the GM banana plants
The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) has received a licence application (DIR 199) from Queensland University of Technology (QUT) for commercial cultivation of genetically modified (GM) banana plants. The GM banana plants have been modified for disease resistance and also contain an antibiotic marker gene that was used for the selection of plants during research.
Separate food approval process
QUT has also applied to Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for the fruit and other products of this GM banana to be permitted for sale as food. FSANZ is currently undertaking a public consultation on their safety assessment, including labelling requirements. The FSANZ website has more information on this food application, A1274.
Steps in the decision-making process for cultivation of the GM banana plants
Steps 1 and 2 have been completed: Initially, the Regulator sought advice on this application from experts, agencies and authorities, and local councils. Subsequently, this advice was considered in the preparation of the Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan (RARMP) for the application.
Step 3. The public consultation on the RARMP is currently open and will close on 6 November 2023.
You can access the RARMP and associated documents on our DIR-199 webpage. We are seeking your written comments on issues relating to the protection of human health and safety and the environment. If you have any questions or would like to receive a copy of the full application or a hard copy of the RARMP, please contact us and quote the reference number DIR-199. For contact details, see below.
Note that experts, agencies and authorities have also been asked for further advice.
Step 4. The RARMP will be finalised, taking into consideration the comments received in Step 3.
Step 5. The Regulator must decide whether or not to issue a licence by the legislative due date. The licence decision will be publicly notified, and the GMO Record updated, including our website. If you have subscribed to receive our updates, we will automatically send you a notification once a licence decision was made.
Office of the Gene Technology Regulator MDP 54 GPO Box 9848 CANBERRA ACT 2601 Telephone: 1800 181 030 E-mail: ogtr@health.gov.au
OGTR website
Dr Raj Bhula
Gene Technology Regulator 25 September 2023″
https://www.ogtr.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-09/dir199_invitation_to_comment.pdf
OK. UN rent boy Albo. This is where the NO Campaign asserts victory.
We have had a solid initiation from the Yes Campaign. And we have heard all the Indigenous leaders who have given themselves permission to refer to ‘my people’, ‘my Indigenous people’, ‘my Black people’, ‘my Aboriginal people’ etc. We have heard them. We have heard them all – across a range of issues. And everybody is of course, OK with this.
I don’t think the NO Vote was about NO to racial division. I think it was about no to any sovereignty other than Australian sovereignty as inclusive of all Australian citizens.
It is high time Australia’s majority demographic which was the powerhouse of the NO Campaign gave ourselves permission to refer to ‘my people’, ‘my White Australian people’, ‘my European heritage people, ‘my Anglo-Celtic people who founded the Australian state, established and champion its sovereignty. And anybody who is not OK with this will find out soon enough that the NO Vote was not about NO to racial identity and politics – which the political elites all agree is OK for everyone except White Australians.
Demographics is destiny.
And it is this VOICE which must now say that ‘labor has compromised the national sovereignty” of Australia and our White Australian people who identify as Australian. And the Lab/NLP/Green coalition is using either enviro-communism or Black Identity politics to shamelessly hand over Australian sovereignty to the UN.
The political VOICE of the NO Vote and its demonstration is not the moment the Canberra Marxists and political elites have waited for
Won’t be happy til we are all starving , eating questionable food from overseas or living without electricity
Can we afford to wait for the next elections to put an end to the treasonous transfer of land use to foreign powers?
I seem to remember a mechanism by which the people can declare no confidence in a sitting government. Those who have studied legal history as far back as Magna Carta would recall how this is done. My guess is that 70% of the nation, an absolute majority, would participate and that there is no retreat from this position.
Are there any honest lawyers left on the floor?
“He said Australians would be outraged to learn that Labor had …”. The reaction of the average Aussie: “What;’s the score, ‘av another drink.” They’ve been selling us out since pedo Witless, Raser, Ork, Bleating, Oward …, and nobody except I and a few others blinked.
Hey, but trust the science (we’ve trusted evolutionary baloney long enough)! always wear a mask! Don’t forget the booster. And uh, make sure your next car is an EV.