Blog Archives

At last legal action against Victoria CHO Brett Sutton and invalid PCR test

Covid PCR tests to be withdrawn from use because of inaccuracy but Cairns will be shut down after a probable false positive

Cairns residents are mugs if they cop another lockdown supposedly due to a ‘mysterious’ Covid infection of a taxi driver which had been detected by the totally discredited PCR test.

The Labor Party is hell bent on dismembering small business in Cairns in deference to Coles, Woolworths, KMart, McDonalds and the other transnational stores.

Will they close? No because they contribute large amounts to the ALP and LNP election war chests.

The Covid PCR tests manufactured by the US company CDC (Centre for Disease Control), state on the directions:

“Positive [test] results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”

Up to 97 per cent false positives from around the world have resulted in the PCR test (above) being withdrawn from the market.

In fact CDC has copped so much flak over its unreliable test that the company has decided to withdraw the test kit from the market after killing the world economy.

(Natural News) After more than a year of committing scientific fraud to push false “positives” via PCR testing, the CDC has announced it is withdrawing the RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel on December 31st of this year:

After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.

Queensland and NSW Health Departments have stated they use the PCR test at 40 cycles when it was designed to detect SARS 2 Covid at only 25 cycles. Hence the large number of false positives occurring in Queensland and is without doubt the case of the Cairns taxi driver said to have tested positive, causing the shutdown.

Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that:

“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”

Similarly, the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.

The court pointed out that “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”.

A false test result has enabled Queensland Chief Health Officer Jeanette Young and Labor Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk to close down Cairns from 4pm today for three days.

Furthermore vaccinated victims have been found to test positive and begin viral shedding soon after the jab, infecting others in close proximity.

The Cairns economy has been reeling from a loss of international tourists on which it is heavily reliant. Many small businesses have closed, most of them permanently and the remaining small business cannot afford another lock down.

Cairns has three Labor state members. Make them feel the heat and if residents wear dangerous masks, get mRNA jabs, aid people tracking and lock themselves in their homes they deserve all they will get over the next 12 months, provided they remain alive after their jab.

NSW Health – Covid PCR tests at 40 cycles, double the recommended rate yielding 80 per cent false positives*

Letter to the Editor

Be sure to look at this excellent resource:
https://corpau.blogspot.com/2021/06/exposed-australian-governments-locking.html

Corporate Australia

A look into Corporate fraud in Australia, Stranglehold of Monopolies, Telecommunications Oppression, Biased Law System, Corporate influence in politics, Industrial Relations disadvantaging workers, Outsourcing Australian Jobs, Offshore Banking, Petrochemical company domination, Invisibly Visible. It’s not what you see, it’s what goes on behind the scenes.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (ABN: 122 104 616)
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (ABN: 122 104 616)
Australia’s Prime Minister (CEO) Tony Abbott : “Australia is Open for Business”

26 June 2021
EXPOSED! Australian governments locking up people under false pretences

Briefly!

In a response to a question on how many cycles are used to determine if someone has the alleged disease, the NSW Health Department stated the number of cycles being 40.

The link in the above description is the following:

https://www.pathology.health.nsw.gov.au/covid-19-info/covid-19-testing-information

A quick screen capture from an apparently official global source on the topic, that governments swear by, states that the standard recommendation for the detection of the disease should be in the range of 25-30 cycles.

PCR Covid test kit. Here is a CDC notation from the directions of use about results. I suggest you read it several times.
“Positive [test] results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”

See reference to the above screen capture:

https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/sars-cov-2-antigen-detecting-rapid-diagnostic-test-implementation-proposals

The European Parliament even posed the question:

Within the link:

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2021-001810_EN.html

In summary, the NSW government has gone above the threshold in testing, yielding false positives and therefore unlawfully locking up Australians as have other states.

https://corpau.blogspot.com/2021/06/exposed-australian-governments-locking.html

from P Hodges, NSW

  • Dr Judy Mikovits

Lockdowns stemming from highly inaccurate PCR tests are unlawful

Letter to the Editor

The (Covid) cycle testing should not exceed 20 or else tests are worthless-You can find the video on this made by the PCR inventor before his death. It is a staged-managed affair. Governments were paid to enforce the initial lockdowns as evidenced by Belarus refusing the 940 million offered at the time. I believe governments are essentially being blackmailed and being told they will be unable to borrow unless WEF/IMF.WHO instructions are adhered to. Remember that Western countries are broke and cannot fund future social programs and liabilities. The primary goal is population reduction and ultimately monetary debasement and a financial reset setting up a universal basic income which will allow a reduced population to eke out an existence.Much has been written about this now. Here is a good starting point

https://winteroak.org.uk/the-great-reset/

from Chris

NSW

It is against the law for a business to require another person to download CovidSafe to a phone

Letter to the Editor

Got this from KNOW YOUR RIGHTS show. The relevant part starts at about nine minute mark in this utube (274) More on masks, fines, QR code’s and PCR tests. 28 January 2021 – YouTube. I found it and the relevant parts follow:

Copy of Section 94 of Privacy Act 1998 part 8a Public Contact Information 94H sub section 2 Privacy Act 1988 No. 119, 1988 Privacy Act 1988 No. 119, 1988 Compilation No. 85 Compilation date: 16 December 2020 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 129, 2020 Registered: 20 January 2021 About this compilation

This compilation 94H Requiring the use of COVIDSafe (1) A person commits an offence if the person requires another person to: (a) download COVIDSafe to a communication device; or (b) have COVIDSafe in operation on a communication device; or (c) consent to uploading COVID app data from a communication device to the National COVIDSafe Data Store.

Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both. (2) A person commits an offence if the person: (a) refuses to enter into, or continue, a contract or arrangement with another person (including a contract of employment); or (b) takes adverse action (within the meaning of the Fair Work Act 2009) against another person; or (c) refuses to allow another person to enter: (i) premises that are otherwise accessible to the public; or (ii) premises that the other person has a right to enter; or

(d) refuses to allow another person to participate in an activity; or (e) refuses to receive goods or services from another person, or insists on providing less monetary consideration for the goods or services; or (f) refuses to provide goods or services to another person, or insists on receiving more monetary consideration for the goods or services; on the ground that, or on grounds that include the ground that, the other person:

(g) has not downloaded COVIDSafe to a communication device; or (h) does not have COVIDSafe in operation on a communication device; or (i) has not consented to uploading COVID app data from a communication device to the National COVIDSafe Data Store.

Penalty: Imprisonment for 5 years or 300 penalty units, or both. (3) To avoid doubt: (a) subsection (2) is a workplace law for the purposes of the Fair Work Act 2009; and (b) the benefit that the other person derives because of an obligation of the person under subsection (2) is a workplace right within the meaning of Part 3 1 of that.

From L Heale

Queensland

Queensland’s turn for another lock down driven by PCR testing lies

While Queensland Health lies about the effectiveness of PCR testing, it also bans the readily available COVID treatment hydroxychloroquine and ignores the even more effective Ivermectin triple therapy treatment made available for prescription by Professor Thomas Borody of Sydney and promoted by US doctors like Pierre Kory MD (above) pictured testifying to the US Senate.

By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
QUEENSLAND’S “health” dictators have again shut down the state on the basis of dodgy PCR (or RT-PCR) testing that they lie about on their official website. Thousands of Brisbane businesses, schools and other facilities are being shut down for three days before Easter along with schools and other facilities based on four new alleged “COVID-cases” around the city, bringing the “case” total to seven.

In reference to the accuracy of PCR testing, Queensland Health states: “It’s very uncommon for these tests to return an incorrect result, but it’s important to remember that issues can occur in all types of testing.” Research by the highly-respected

Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine in the UK largely contradicts this claim.

 

But to that claim, Queensland Health adds a little qualifer: “To account for this, if there are doubts about the accuracy of a particular test result, your doctor may ask you to be re-tested.” The “go back to your doctor” escape clause is also used by PCR testing companies.

One of Queensland’s five COVID-19 testing companies refused to comment on the accuracy of its PCR testing process. When contacted and asked about the accuracy of tests, the Brisbane office of Sullivan Nicolaides told a caller to “contact your doctor”. The company simply refused to answer any questions about testing accuracy.

Local GPs may not know much about the accuracy of PCR tests if they are not familiar with recent research showing them to be highly inaccurate. PCR testing is also the subject of legal action around the world. Nevertheless, Queensland and other state medical authorities are still relying to the tests to inflict damaging lockdowns on the state.

Worldwide, it has been revealed that PCR testing has been testing with high cycle thresholds, that is, the times that the amplifying test has to be repeated to get a positive result. The higher the viral concentration the lower the amplification cycles are necessary.

The state of Florida, which is defying Biden and the Democrats’ use of COVID as a wrecking ball against small business and society in general, is making reporting of cycle thresholds in testing mandatory. This will help the state health authorities get a more accurate indicator of real viral threats instead of citing every positive test as “a case”, as happens in Australia.

According to the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine “PCR detection of viruses is helpful so long as its accuracy can be understood: it offers the capacity to detect RNA in minute quantities, but whether that RNA represents infectious virus may not be clear.”

But after reviewing 14 studies, the CEBM reported “It was not possible to make a precise quantitative assessment of the association between RT-PCR results and the success rate of viral culture within these studies. These studies were not adequately sized nor performed in a sufficiently standardised manner and may be subject to reporting bias.”

In other words, Queensland Health and the entire Australian health bureaucracy are relying on tests based on poor, inconclusive research. “These studies provided limited data of variable quality that PCR results per se are unlikely to predict viral culture from human samples. Insufficient attention may have been paid how PCR results relate to disease. The relation with infectiousness is unclear and more data are needed on this,” the CEBM reported.

Significantly, the CEBM said if this was not understood “PCR results may lead to restrictions for large groups of people who do not present an infection risk.” Are you listening Queensland Health? It’s unlikely, because the clowns running our health bureaucracies are under the control of the global pharma complex pushing vaccines for their own stupendous profits and the idiotic social engineering schemes of the World Economic Forum and Gates-Rockefeller mass eugenics.

An extensive open letter by Danielle Burnie on the PCR testing scandal and addressed to Professor John Skerritt of the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration was published by Cairns News on February 26. Ms Burnie is threatening to sue the TGA if they do not act to rectify procedures based on the testing.

“PCR tests results have been used by the government to justify implementation of strict and drastic measures that have negatively impacted on people’s lives and resulted in many deaths. The results have been a violation of human rights by removing freedom, destroying businesses, isolating and torturing our elderly, causing a major mental health crisis, causing great suffering to children and families, greater poverty, increased suicides and other unnecessary deaths. The people of Australia are suffering PTSD as a direct result of Government measures,” Ms Burnie wrote.

“This is a clear act of misfeasance. This practice needs to be ceased immediately and I urge you to recall all PCR testing equipment and demand that any government measures that were applied based on these test statistics be immediately ceased. A proper evaluation needs to be conducted and a thorough investigation must be launched into the misconduct by the government in relation to PCR testing.”

Perhaps Professor Skerritt and his fellow pharma plants on the TGA may be prompted to act as legal action such Serene Teffaha’s class-action lawsuit in Victoria’s Supreme Court on behalf of locked-down high-rise housing estate residents proceeds. Teffaha is also planning a national class action against the range of unlawful and oppressive so-called anti-COVID measures including lockdowns, detentions, mandatory mask wearing and “mandated” vaccinations.



Open letter to Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk about unreliable PCR tests her boss keeps using

Covid PCR test fraudulent and every country knows it

Dear Premier,

Doing things the right way.

Talk to Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. He understands the game.

In December, his office issued an order to all state labs processing COVID PCR tests. They must now report “the number of cycles” they deploy in every test they perform.

Roughly speaking, a cycle is a quantum leap which increases the sensitivity of the test. As readily asserted by Anthony Fauci, any test using more than 35 cycles is meaningless.

Not only meaningless, but laden with false-positive results. The patient is falsely claimed “infected.”

However, the FDA and the CDC, since the launch of the COVID PCR test, have been recommending using 40 cycles; and therefore labs have been following this advice.  The latest advice I have is that Australian tests are run at 40 to 45 cycles.

The outcome, in terms of falsely inflated case numbers, has been a disaster.

Furthermore, as reported by the New York Times, testing labs never tell the patient or the doctor how many cycles they use in running the PCR.

Now, all lockdowns, mask wearing and other restrictive measures are based on 3 things, the number of COVID cases in your state; the number of COVID deaths; and the number of COVID hospitalizations.

But you see, all three statistical categories depend on a positive PCR test. And since the test, improperly run, has resulted in huge numbers of false-positives, you can restore sanity and more accurate data by following Governor DeSantis’ lead.

Once your state labs report how many cycles they are using for each PCR test they run, you can reject any test that deploys over 35 cycles. You can eliminate vast numbers of false-positives, and when you DO…

The number of COVID cases, COVID deaths, and COVID hospitalizations in your state will sharply decline, as they should.

In a nutshell, a vast fraud has been perpetrated on the people, and you can stop it.

You can restore sanity, re-open your state, and make the stranglehold of COVID restrictions a thing of the past.

Remember, any PCR test run over 35 cycles does not give meaningful results. There will be vast numbers of false positives, especially in Queensland where the population at large does not carry the virus. Your own Health Department statistics show that out of 2,012,660 tests only 1,368 “cases” (0.07%) have been found.  If these 1,368 cases have been detected using the PCR test run at over 35 cycles, most of these cases may be false positives making the case numbers even lower!

There is no real COVID epidemic in Queensland (The Sunshine State) and your State Government is making mountains out of mole hills!

Yours sincerely,

David Blake

Bribie Island  4507

PCR Covid testing 94% inaccurate, ignored by TGA boss John Skerritt

Any Covid statistics quoted by government are completely erroneous

By Danielle Burnie

Professor John Skerritt

Therapeutic Goods Association

info@tga.gov.au

devices@tga.gov.au

PO Box 100

Woden ACT 2606

Australia

CC: Australian Department of Health; Office of Health Protection; The Public Health Laboratory Network; The Advisory Committee on Medicines; Australian Medical Association; Political bodies; media outlets; Australia Federal Police; Victoria Police; The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet; Parliament of Australia; Australian Human Rights Commission; My Aged Care.

FORMAL COMPLAINT – PCR TESTING AUSTRALIA

Dear Mr Skerritt,

I am writing to make an official complaint about the medical device and subsequent testing process for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Australia.

The PCR tests being used in Australia were expedited due to the ‘pandemic’ nature of Covid-19. This means they have been approved based on very limited clinical and performance data.

Head of the Therapeutic Goods Authority Professor John Skerritt apparently has ignored this excellent summary of the ineffectiveness of PCR Covid testing. The TGA has long been held captive by Big Pharma and the Australian Medical Association.

It is well and truly overdue that the PCR testing be properly and thoroughly evaluated.

Before this occurs, I urge you to call an immediate cessation to the use of these testing devices in Australia.

These tests are being used by the government to justify measures protecting against a pandemic. The pandemic was declared by the WHO and it should be noted that the WHO changed the definition of a ‘pandemic’ 12 years ago, a pandemic was originally defined as a disease that spread worldwide resulting in widespread serious illness and death. Now it merely requires that a disease spread worldwide. If we, in Australia accept this definition, it makes it very easy to declare a pandemic when a screening tool like PCR tests are used as diagnostic tools. The number of deaths and ‘cases’ in Australia does not merit the declaration of a pandemic here, especially when these numbers are based on PCR testing.

The Government is using these tests results not only in Australia but the rest of the world, where PCR is also being used, to justify the following (not limited to):

  • Passing laws to give unprecedented authority to civilians (Omnibus).
  • Passing federal laws to enable foreign troops and foreign police forces to enter Australia in the event of an emergency, immune from prosecution. (Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies) Bill 2020.
  • Violating privacy by the proposed use of telephone GPS for contact tracing.
  • Border closures
  • 200+ days and counting of severe restrictions on the state of Victoria including:
  • Limits on numbers of visitors in households
  • Limits on numbers of contacts outside the home
  • Shutting down of schools
  • Businesses closed
  • 5km radius restriction from homes
  • Denied access of visitors to retirement homes
  • Isolation of ‘suspected’ or ‘confirmed’ cases
  • Mandatory wearing of masks in public
  • Mandatory wearing of masks by children in school
  • Limit of 1 hour exercise per day
  • A nightly curfew between 8pm – 5am
  • Social distancing.

A vaccination campaign has already begun with policies such as no jab, no pay. No jab, no travel. This is a serious and provocative threat by the government and once again justified in their opinion by ‘case’ numbers.

The physiological and psychological consequences of these policies will have devastating and uncountable consequences on the lives of all Australians. The deaths and permanent injuries caused will outnumber by thousands any death or permanent injury caused by Covid-19.

The weight that is being placed on the statistics is monumental. And the statistics are all being derived from PCR testing.

You have a responsibility to investigate this medical fraud, I do not use that term lightly. But there is enough evidence for me to be extremely concerned that this is exactly that, medical fraud.

Please see below the information I have gathered about PCR testing.

1. The TGA’s own ‘information for health professionals’ page says there is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available Covid-19 tests. AND ‘Covid-19 is an emerging viral infectious disease. There is limited evidence available to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of available Covid-19 tests’.

2. PCR TESTING DOES NOT DISTINGUISH BETWEEN COVID-19 AND INFLUENZA

The Covid-19 virus has never been isolated. Each and every positive test is an ‘assumption’ that the test is picking up the SARS-CoV-2 virus. As confirmed by the CDC1.

‘The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019- nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen’.

In the user guide of one test available in Australia, it clearly states the PCR test does not distinguish between SARS-CoV-2, influenza, RSV A and B types. The guide goes on to say that a positive result should be evaluated by a health care professional in the context of medical history, symptoms and other tests2.

In September 2020, Roche Pharmaceuticals developed a unique PCR test that distinguishes between the flu and Covid-19. This has received emergency authorisation in the US3. This clearly shows that before this date no tests were able to distinguish between Covid-19 and the flu.

3. THE SARS-CoV-2 VIRUS HAS NEVER BEEN ISOLATED

A FOI request to Public Health England revealed that the virus has not been isolated4. The FOI response can be found in the references.

Public Health England also confirmed that detecting viral material by PCR does not indicate that the virus is fully intact nor infectious5.

Dr Andrew Kaufman criticised a paper published in Nature which claims to prove the pathogenicity of Covid-19. Dr Kaufman disproved the study showing that SARS-CoV-2 does not meet Koch’s 4 postulates for germ theory. Koch’s postulates are the basic principles that must be met before a virus can be proved to cause disease6.

This is collaborated in another article showing that SARS-CoV-2 fails to meet even one of Koch’s postulates let alone them all7. This is a vital point that has been deliberately ignored by governments worldwide.

PCR tests are calibrated to match a specific RNA, but we do not know that the RNA is specifically from the SARS-CoV-2 virus because it has never been correctly isolated or purified. So, to which RNA are the PCR tests showing positive?

In an article titled ‘PCR Covid-19 Test are Scientifically Meaningless’, study authors of all relevant papers (‘proving the existence of SARS-CoV-2) were contacted and they all confirmed that the shots depicted in their experiments did not show purified viruses8.

4. FALSE POSITIVES

PCR tests have a false positive rate of around 0.8%. Dr Yeadon, former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer states ‘The likelihood of an apparently positive case being a false positive is between 89 to 94 percent or near certainty’9.

According to Dr Malcolm Kendrick10, the negative percentage agreement (NPA) of most commercially available tests is 95.6%. If we look at a practical example using the UK figures (since Australia’s ‘cases’ are so low), it would look like this: From 350,001 tests, 2, 948 were positive. Using the NPA we get the following figures:

0.956 = TN / 350,100

Therefore, the number of true negatives is:

TN = 350,100 * 0.956 = 334696

Therefore, the number of false positives we would expect from 350,100 tests is: FP = 350,100 – 334,696 = 15,404

This is more than five times the number of positive tests reported, which means we cannot have any confidence that any one of those positive tests represents a genuine case. When you apply this to the Australian cases, the numbers are so drastically low that it is statistically impossible for any of them to be true positives. The question is ‘where are all the false positives’?

Contributing to the evidence of false positives, a study called ‘Diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection: the danger of over-reliance on positive test results’ found the following: ‘The high specificity (usually 100%) reported in PCR-based tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection do not represent the real-world use of these tests, where contamination and human error produce significant rates of false positives. Widespread lack of awareness of the real-world false positive rates affects an array of clinical, case management and health policy decisions. Similarly, health authorities’ guidance on interpreting test results is often wrong. Steps should be taken immediately to reduce the frequency and impacts of false positive results, including checking positive results with additional tests at least when prevalence is low11’.

Another study, ‘An optimisation of four SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR assays in a Kenyan laboratory to support the national COVID-19 rapid response teams’, found the following: ‘We highlight the challenges encountered in the use of the BGI kit that we noted was prone to false positives, but this was mitigated by diluting the reagent volumes and by including an additional confirmatory assay12.

It should be noted that Victoria is using the BGI kits.

A study on the potential false positive rates of asymptomatic patients found that ‘In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives,’ the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%’13.

Dr Reiner Fuellmich14 from the German Corona Investigative Committee explains that the developer of the Covid-19 PCR test, Professor Drosten used an old SARS virus to create the PCR test which returned a positive from Covid-19 victims in China. This very inaccurate beginning was enough for the WHO to declare a pandemic and authorise worldwide use of PCR testing. They have never validated Drosten’s test. Drosten himself said in 2014 that PCR testing was so highly sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive.

This test cannot detect infection. An infection is when a virus penetrates cells and causes symptoms and only then is a person contagious. Until then, it is completely harmless.

Alarmingly, in 2007 PCR tests were responsible for the incorrect belief that whooping cough was spreading through a hospital in New Hampshire, US. This mistake had serious ramifications. Thousands were given antibiotics and vaccines. 8 months later the victims received an email saying the tests were incorrect due to their over sensitivity15. There is a very high chance this is happening around the world now, especially in Australia given the extremely low case numbers. However, the ramifications here, are even more serious than just antibiotics and vaccines (although this is also incredibly concerning). Read the rest of this entry