Following China’s security pact with the Solomon Islands, Chinese Government-owned companies were parties to a hearing in the Supreme Court of Western Australia designed to circumvent the Australia Foreign Investment Review Board, Mineralogy Chairman Clive Palmer said today.
Mr Palmer confirmed that Chinese Government companies were seeking control over hundreds of square kilometres of Western Australian land and had not sought approval from the FIRB as required by Australian law.
He said the Chinese Government was unlawfully seeking control of Australian land in the Pilbara region.
“By commencing actions in the Supreme Court of Western Australia, the Chinese Government companies were creating tension between the court and the FIRB,’’ Mr Palmer said.
“This is a tactic to divide and conquer our nation used frequently by the Communist-Government quest internationally.
“This is a serious attack on Australian sovereignty and the loyalty of Australian citizens assisting the Chinese Government-owned companies is a concern,’’ Mr Palmer said.
“In essence, they are trying to gain control of the Port of Cape Preston without first seeking approval of the FIRB. All Australians should be alarmed. I have serious concerns for Australia’s security.
“Mineralogy has not been able to gain access to its own tenements to inspect what the Chinese companies are actually doing at Cape Preston despite written agreements requiring such access.
“We received complaints from workers on site that there are secret activities going on. I believe the Minister of Defence must have the site inspected in the interests of the nation’s security,’’ Mr Palmer said.
“It is a matter of great concern that the Chinese Government companies are occupying a major Australian port and denying full access to Australian companies who own the right to the land where they are constructed,’’ Mr Palmer said.
Government shamdemic COVID-19 agenda to shut down the backbone of Australian employers and traders, the family business, has created a conga line to their bankruptcy court with a plethora of family homes foreclosures. With phase two in place, the Taxation Department enforcers are scooping up survivors by executing tax debts for not receiving any income.
It’s not extreme to say that the Australian Taxation Office is conducting a brazen financial bombing campaign against small and family businesses across Australia.
Last week we informed you about the ATO’s taking a position where, at law and in its administration, it can (and is) creating and imposing tax debts where the taxpayer has not received any income. It’s gobsmacking but the High Court has said that this is ‘legal’ even though it also remarked that it’s clearly unfair. This is happening with family businesses using trusts—but watch the ATO expand this agenda.
Now we have more news of the ATO’s small business destruction campaign. In February the ATO released draft rulings that would declare family trust payments to adults to be illegal. What? This throws out decades of accepted, legal, small/family business income distributions. It would be like declaring that dividends from public companies (eg Telstra, BHP, CBA) were illegal. But more! Such declarations were to be backdated to 2015. So distributions that were legal over the last eight years could now be declared illegal. This is small/family business-hating, ATO madness.
Then last week, just before the election was called, the government and the ATO issued a ‘sort of‘ backdown. Well, not really. The statement says they’ll still deny distributions but will not apply them retrospectively. In other words, the attack continues but not as bad ‘sort of’!
There’s more for us to report on this intensifying ATO small/family business tax ‘bombing’ campaign. More pressing at the moment, however, is the need for solutions to fix this destructive ATO behaviour.
Jason Falinski MP has been the greatest friend of small business in the Australian Parliament over the last few years. He’s been doing real stuff. Not simply talking.
Jason chairs the parliamentary committee that keeps watch on the ATO. He’s guided and pushed the review that’s come up with some common-sense, balanced ATO reform recommendations. At the heart of these is a legislated ‘Taxpayer Rights’ Act. We reported on this in October last year.
Taxpayer Rights would: Ensure that the ATO could not collect a debt until all appeals have been finalised. Reverse the onus of proof of fraud or evasion so that it lies with the ATO. Establish the office of Taxpayer Advocate to ensure that the ATO complied with the Taxpayer Rights Act. The ‘Falinski’ Report is a huge step forward for Australian small and family businesses in particular.
As we’re now in the full-blown election campaign period, we need to know from both Scott Morrison and Anthony Albanese where they stand on Taxpayer Rights. Frankly, it’s the critical issue for Australian small and family businesses.
If Scott Morrison and Anthony Albanese both remain silent on this issue, it really means that they both endorse the current anti-small business behaviour of the ATO.
With best wishes. Ken Phillips and the
Team at Self-Employed Australia
Senator Malcolm Roberts dropped bombshells in Senate after COVID Under Question inquiry. March 30, 2022.
By Allison Ryan – Excerpts from the Senator’s speech:
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Agency, Ahpra, has been bullying medical practitioners into not reporting or even for talking about the harm they’re seeing. The TGA erased 98 per cent of the 800 vaccine deaths that physicians reported. The TGA did so without autopsy or suitable consideration of all the patient medical data.
Section 22D(2) of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 requires the Secretary of the Department of Health to ensure the quality, safety and efficacy of the vaccines were satisfactorily established for each cohort for which the provision of approval is being granted. Data recently revealed in court papers in the United States clearly shows that vaccine harm was apparent in the clinical trials that Pfizer, BioNTech and others conducted. This information, if ATAGI had bothered to ask for it, should have resulted in a refusal of the application for provisional use.
…the secretary took pharmaceutical companies’ word for the safety of their products. These are the same pharmaceutical companies that have been fined over and over for criminal behaviour. AstraZeneca got a US$355 million fine for fraud and, separately, a $550 million fine for making unfounded claims about efficacy. Pfizer got a $430 million fine for making unfounded claims about efficacy, and a $2.3 billion fine for making unfounded claims about efficacy and for paying kickbacks.
This is who the Liberal-Nationals, Labor and Greens—our very own pharmaceutical lobby—want to pay more money. That’s not on the basis of extensive local testing and inquiry, it’s simply on the basis of taking pharmaceutical companies safety assurances. There’s no testing. It’s an assurance made easy by indemnity against any damage that the vaccines cause. The Labor Party and the Liberal-National Party have accepted $1 million each from the pharmaceutical establishment in this election cycle alone. Billions more are being set aside in this week’s budget to pay the pharmaceutical companies to keep the COVID-19 gravy train going.
The decision to ban proven, safe, affordable and accessible alternative treatments that are working around the world was taken to ensure the fastest and widest-possible adoption of the vaccines. The TGA’s own customers fund the TGA. That means pharmaceutical companies fund their own product’s approval. That fails the pub test. Where are the checks and balances? There are none.
Vaccine-derived RNA can be reverse transcribed, leading to possible integration into the human genome, which the TGA denies, based only on pharmaceutical companies telling them to deny it. Internal Pfizer data released in February indicate they accept 1,272 different adverse vaccine events, including paralysis and death. German and US insurance actuarial data suggests the TGA’s database of adverse event notifications is underreporting side effects ninefold. Freedom of information documents from 2018 show the TGA keeps two databases of adverse event notifications: one internal, showing all reports of harm; and one public, showing only a part of those. This means vaccine harm is most likely significantly higher than reported.
These are the matters I sought today to refer to the Senate Select Committee on COVID-19 without success. I thank Senators Hanson, Abetz, Rennick and Antic for their support, integrity and courage. The truth is the Select Committee on COVID-19 has been running a protection racket for the pharmaceutical industry, and today’s vote proves it.
An excellent well researched video that should wake up even the most TV and phone manipulated and addicted drones in society. Sorry for the bad language over which we have no control.
By ALEXANDRA BRUCE
Cybersecurity Expert Ehden Biber has legally obtained copies of the Pfizer contracts with Albania, Brazil, Israel and the EU.
He discovered the first one on an Albanian website, where it was published on January 2021. Its veracity was confirmed when he was able to see Brazil’s Pfizer contract, which is virtually identical on that country’s health ministry website, with a signature that was verified by DocuSign. He has since seen virtually same contract with the EU and heard the details of Israel’s Pfizer contract.
The contract, which exposes Pfizer to zero liability for anything and places the liability for everything on the government, which is called the “Purchaser” in the contract.
The deal is a criminal shakedown of epic proportions, the likes of which it is hard to even fathom. Why would anybody sign it?
Reading the contract’s language sheds some light on the inexplicable behavior of the government authorities of the world and on the true nature of this whole COVID operation.
It also may shed light on the untimely deaths of two African presidents and the Haitian president, who all very understandably refused to sign this contract!
In his blog, Biber wrote, “If you were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID19, the contract cannot be voided.”
And here’s a shocking clause about supplying the product:
“Pfizer shall have no liability for any failure to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates… nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product.
“Pfizer shall decide on necessary adjustments to the number of Contracted Doses and Delivery Schedule due to the Purchaser … based on principles to be determined by Pfizer … Purchaser shall be deemed to agree to any revision.”
So Pfizer can breach its own contract but their hitmen will kill you if you refuse to sign it!
You can really see how this Globalist entity that is Pfizer hates nation states and will not recognize their laws but it acts like a “government that dictates to other governments around the world,” as Biber says. If we look around at the complete lawlessness and the meltdown of once-solid institutions all over the world, you can see that Big Pharma is being used like a massive battering ram against the national laws and national sovereignty of all nations.
The contract forces the “Purchaser”, which is how they refer to the nation that is contracting with them to defend Pfizer’s interests and not those of the citizens they’re supposed to be representing and defending – and whose taxpayer money they’re using to pay Pfizer these billions of dollars.
As Biber tweeted, Israel has turned into a pharmaceutical #BananaRepublic, where the priorities of a multinational supercedes the priorities of its citizens.
Not only is Pfizer held completely harmless from all claims, the “Purchaser”, ie, the national government is responsible for Pfizer’s legal defense against any and all claims!
However, “Pfizer shall have the right to assume control of such defense… and Purchaser shall pay all Losses, including, without limitation, the reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred.” Pfizer makes sure the country will pay for everything.
I really don’t get why governments across the world have signed this. What’s in it for them? Did they sign this voluntarily? It really seems like a colossal shakedown and a complete abdication on the part of these governments to protect their people. It’s malfeasance on a scale that beggars belief.
THE ONLY WAY to get a product recall on these shots is if you can prove fault in Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP), which is regulated by the FDA.
However, CGMP will tell you NOTHING about mRNA, because we don’t have CGMP for an mRNA vaccine, so you cannot prove CGMP malpractice.
(First published in August 2021)
A great video where John Wilson exposes the betrayal of the union movement that will see them finished. The unions have the capability to switch off corporations and government, turn off their power, communications, etc, immediately.
No Jab No Job is being supported by Australian union leaders, not the rank and file, now members are set to revolt.
Riccado sets a message for Australians to take passive action that will bring this covid scam to a screaming halt.
The establishment is in damage control and we the people need to move on that situation to crush the oppressor’s juggernaut
The Minister’s foreword “Australians are keen and willing to adapt to challenges” (https://www.digitalidentity.gov.au/have-your-say/phase-3/ministers-foreword) – is surely an overstatement of the fact.
Most Australians have not a clue of just how they have been led along the Global Governance pathway by our politicians.
On Dec 15, 2015, The Age newspaper scribbled at the end of an article, “Fairfax Media is a partner of United Nations Foundation”.
So much for an independent news source!
For one example, Australians have been forced and purposefully driven to get the covid19 injection put into their bodies, which is a bio-weaponized injection containing bio-technological and bio-engineered poison.
Now this SAME Govt is going to legislate for a digital ID system so that every Australian citizen will be hooked into the production and consumption processes of the new economic international order. The digital ID system means that human to human communication will diminish. Data will be managed and controlled according to the evolving dictates of the global system. Eventually, the Revelation of God to apostle John tells us, the system will enslave your soul. The beast is the final world dictator before the return of Jesus Christ, and to buy and sell under his rule, a person must take his “mark”.
UN has been spreading its Global Citizenship agenda into the nations for almost a decade now. This is yet a further development in the plan for universal control of all resources on earth, inc human ‘resources’. Because Digital ID will be able to track, monitor and control personal and economic behavior we will have to find other ways to interact with others.
The Digital Identity Factsheet p1 says: In 2015, the Australian Government took the first steps to develop a digital identity system after a financial inquiry highlighted the benefits of digital identity for the economy. From the AFR Oct 20, 2015, “David Murray’s financial system inquiry recommended: Develop a national strategy for a federated-style model of trusted digital identities.” Outcomes were The Digital Transformation Office, a Trusted Digital Identity Framework, and Government’s Digital Transformation Agenda. https://www.afr.com/technology/how-the-tech-changes-from-david-murrays-financial-system-inquiry-rated-20151020-gkdnuz
The Digital Identity Factsheet p4 says: “We’re working to develop a fair and transparent charging framework that will support the expansion of the system and ensure it is sustainable in the long-term. While this isn’t included in this legislation, it will be enabled by it.” The “it” refers to expansion of the Digital ID system for sustainably protecting Mother Earth, goddesss of the Earth Charter.
The Identification for Development (ID4D) uses Australian Aid. To accelerating the ID4D work at global, regional and country levels, the ID4D Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDTF) was established with catalytic contributions from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation followed by the UK Government, the French Government, the AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT and the Omidyar Network. This MDTF provides a platform for partners to cohesively advance progress across ID4D’s three pillars with a common vision and shared actions; and shapes global approaches and a shared vision on identification.
I think we could say a lot in any Submission to this draft Trusted Digital Identity Bill .
Thanks for the notification Cairnsnews.
Patrick Wood’s Technocracy News and Trends is a good source of information too.
By Subscriber Alison
A Bill to enable use of foreign troops or foreign police in Australian “emergencies” is called the “Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force response to Emergencies) Bill, 2020”.
Parliament of Aust website: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2021a/21bd015
Quotes from sources:
Further the legislation includes the use of foreign military forces and foreign police to assist in “emergencies”. Surely we Australians are, with appropriate resources and organisation, capable of addressing emergencies without the need for foreign troops or foreign police. And we certainly don’t want these foreign forces confronting and suppressing legitimate protest actions by Australian citizens.
In addition the legislation provide immunity from civil or criminal prosecution to the defence forces including foreign military, for their actions in these “emergencies”.
The “grossly inadequate” Human Rights Statement “does not address public rights that may well be infringed under these provisions.” The proposed immunities would also extend to “foreign military and police forces”, suggesting more than a cheerful nod of approval to those nuclear armed allies across the pond. “The use of a foreign army or militarised police force should not be allowed at all, and certainly not without the safeguard of citizens’ rights of access to courts.”
Under the cover of stealth and reliable apathy, powers have been vested in Australia’s military and ministerial authorities with scant debate and even less scrutiny. As law academic Michael Head points out with noticeable alarm, powers calling out the Australian Defence Force to deal with, for instance, “domestic violence”, or likely dangers to “declared infrastructure” are left undefined. Vagueness bedevils the legislation, passed ostensibly to protect the populace against terrorist attacks. “Once deployed, military personnel can exercise extraordinary powers over civilians, overturning basic legal and democratic rights.”
The government insists that the bill does not authorise armed force against civilians, but there is no such protection in the legislation. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/10/16/mili-o16.html
I BELIEVE there are very worrying implications in a bill being considered in federal parliament. It is called the Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force response to Emergencies) Bill, 2020. It enables the ADF and Reserves to be used in emergencies, but “emergencies” is undefined.
Bushfire assistance is one emergency which might be justified but could certain so-called disruptive industrial actions or disruptive mass climate change protests be considered emergencies? These are legitimate actions in our democracy, and I believe being confronted or suppressed by the defence forces or reserves would not be a legitimate use of these forces in a healthy democracy.
Further, the legislation includes the use of foreign military forces and foreign police to assist in emergencies. Surely we Australians are, with appropriate resources and organisation, capable of addressing emergencies without the need for foreign troops or foreign police? We certainly don’t want these foreign forces confronting and suppressing legitimate protest actions by Australian citizens.
Our political representatives in federal parliament should be urged to halt this legislation until it is closely examined by civil rights and constitutional law experts to ensure our civil and democratic rights are not under threat or our sovereignty compromised by this legislation.
It’s about setting up a hub within our national borders to kickstart the next step towards the overall goals of complete implementation of the UN Agenda 2030 doctrine.
Mark Latham has been the state leader of One Nation in New South Wales since November 2018, and was a previous leader of the Labor Party in December 2003. Mark comments on the pending covid passport legality, government bullying of the people and much more.
By SANDY BARRETT – ADVOCATEME.COM.AU
Our political leaders have adopted the mantra that mass vaccination is the only way to reopen the country. From this mantra our leaders and their agents have successfully compelled large groups of the population to get vaccinated. As of today, official data claims that 59.1% have had their first dose and 35.5% both doses.
Australia has largely embraced vaccinations over the years, and most consider them safe and effective. So, it was surprising that many were hesitant to roll up their sleeves for covid-19 vaccines when it became available. A widely circulated survey from 2020, completed by hundreds of thousands of Australians, indicated the reason for hesitancy was the fact that they were new and largely untested.
Those who took a closer look at these “vaccines” found even more reason to be apprehensive, because they didn’t seem to fall under the traditional definition of what a vaccine is. Historically, vaccines contain a small amount of the virus in question, so the immune system can mount its own defence to the disease. But this new group of vaccines does not work in this way.
The technology being used is as novel as covid-19 itself and is previously untested on humans. Prior to this, tests on animals resulted in complications that ended in death when those vaccinated animals were exposed to the live virus.
For those reasons alone, most can understand the hesitancy, however another reason a growing number of Australians remain hesitant is the secrecy – despite their claims of transparency – surrounding National Cabinet meetings, and the contracts between the Commonwealth government and the vaccine manufacturers.
If the decisions being made were in the best interests of the public, decisions which strip us of our freedom and cause untold social and economic damage to society, why are we not privy to them? This lack of transparency around what are life and death decisions for the health and wellbeing of the population should be a major concern to us all.
For those who don’t already know, Pfizer has a dubious history and in 2009 the company was fined $2.3 billion in a legal settlement over misleading marketing practices. Since the year 2000, according to Violation Tracker, Pfizer has accumulated $4,660,896,333 in fines for:-
- Off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products
- False Claims Act and related infringements / offenses / charges
- Drug or medical equipment safety violation
- Foreign Corrupt Practices Acts violations
- Environmental violation
Johnson & Johnson are not far behind Pfizer, being fined $4,248,447,763 for offences such as:-
- Off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products
- False Claims Act and related offenses
- Drug or medical equipment safety violation
- Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations
- Price-fixing or anti-competitive practices
AstraZeneca are not much better either, being fined only $1,148,775,284, guilty of offences relating to:-
- Off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products
- False Claims Act and related offenses
- Kickbacks and bribery
- Consumer protection violation
- Employment discrimination
Read the full story – https://www.advocateme.com.au/post/golden-ticket-or-poisoned-chalice
Former Australian Army Special Forces Lt. Col. Riccardo Bosi and Leader of the Australia One Party, drawing on his over 40 years of experience, discusses the breakdown of global democracy and the rise of a totalitarian globalism that is now threatening all nations of the world. He details your legal rights in Australia as the government abuse your legal right by illegally forcing COVID vaccination or no work, etc.