Blog Archives

CDC says Coronavirus test is unreliable

Letter to the Editor

It’s all a fake! – Citizens of Wuhan China call the corona virus “fake” its all fake

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcNE_m9qrNc

Here’s what the CDC says about the test for the Coronavirus
Straight from the horse’s mouth—both sides

—The CDC (US Center for Disease Control) admits the coronavirus test is flawed. That’s the overview and the takeaway—

As my readers know, I’ve described why the widespread diagnostic test for the coronavirus is insufficient, misleading, useless, and deceptive.

That test, used all over the world where it is available, is called the PCR.

Coronavirus diagnosis testing is very unreliable according the US Centre for Disease Control

It DIAGNOSES patients. “Yes, you have the virus.” “No you don’t.”

A very alert reader sent me a link to a US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) document about the test. The CDC establishes the guidelines for how the test should be done, and what the results mean.

Here is a CDC paragraph about results. I suggest you read it several times.

“Positive [test] results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”

I’m going to blow past the blatant contradiction in that CDC paragraph and cut to the chase.

The key line in that paragraph is: “The agent detected [the coronavirus] may not be the definite cause of disease.”

BANG.

CDC: Yeah, you see, folks, ahem, the test could say the coronavirus is there in somebody’s body, but the virus may not be causing disease…

On one level, the CDC is admitting the test could turn up false positives: the test could SAY a patient has the coronavirus, but he really doesn’t.

This isn’t a footnote stuck at the bottom of a report. It’s right there near the top of the section about the meaning of the test.

On a deeper level, the CDC is saying straight out, IF THE TEST SHOWS A CORONAVIRUS IS PRESENT, THAT DOESN’T MEAN IT’S CAUSING DISEASE.

Well, yes, I’ve pointed out that the test has an inherent problem. At best, it might show that a virus is present in the patient’s body. But the test is incapable of determining HOW MUCH virus is ACTIVELY REPLICATING in the patient’s body.

And why is that important? Because, to even begin to say a virus is causing actual illness in a human, there would have to be millions and millions of a virus replicating in his body—and the PCR test has never been proven, in the real world, to be able to make such a judgment call accurately.

But, if you read that CDC quote again, you’ll see the CDC is ordering labs to report a positive test result to public health agencies—where it will be counted as a “coronavirus case” come hell or high water.

Thank you, CDC. So very, very much. The next ship for Uranus leaves tomorrow. Pile on board and make the trip. You can run tests there to your heart’s content.

www[dot]cdc[dot]gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/rt-pcr-detection-instructions.html

Read on –

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/03/24/heres-what-the-cdc-says-about-the-test-for-the-coronavirus/

From Crisscross and No More Fake News

US CDC advertised for infectious disease quarantine officers November 2019 long before Wuhan Cov19 announcement

The US Centre for Disease Control has been caught out having prior knowledge of the Coronavirus epidemic by advertising for infectious diseases quarantine officers in November 2019, long before China told the world of the Wuhan outbreak. This revealing video exposes this terrible conspiracy in which Australia is perhaps an unwilling accomplice.

It has been alleged by Sydney psychiatrist Dr Russell McGregor that the Geelong Animal Health Research Institute was involved in the manufacture of the virus. He was struck off the medical register for his trouble.
Big pharma, which is attached to the CDC by an umbilical cord, stands to benefit immensely from the pandemic by releasing a new Cov19 vaccine on the market across the world.

It will make big pharma billions yet some researchers say it won’t work. Now vaccine skeptic Robert F Kennedy has jumped onboard the runaway crisis. Kennedy warned of dangerous vaccines for many years after his son became autistic, like about 2 per cent of all American kids after getting the MMR and other vaccines. He is warning against any newly developed Cov19 vaccine. The US has paid out $3.6 billion in vaccine damages over the past 20 years. Beware of any new or for that matter old flu vaccines.

Protect yourself with high strength Vitamin A & C and colloidal silver.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-03-19-cdc-was-hiring-quarantine-program-managers-november.html

Coronavirus testing probably inaccurate

Virus testing  by Criss Cross

The CDC program immediately raises two problems: why bother testing for a virus if it isn’t really causing human disease; and what kind of test is being done?

In this article, I’m focusing on the type of test, and whether it’s accurate, even if you assume the coronavirus is causing disease.

Reading through CDC literature (see also here), I believe the two most prevalent US testing methods are: antibody, and PCR.

Antibody tests are notorious for cross-reactions. This means factors in no way relevant to a given virus can make the test read positive. In that case, the patient would be falsely told he “has the coronavirus.” But it gets worse. Traditionally, antibody tests reading positive were taken as a good sign for the patient: his immune system had contacted a germ and defeated it. Then, starting in 1984, the science was turned upside down: a positive test was, astoundingly, taken to mean the patient was ill or would soon become ill.

The PCR test (which requires excellent technicians who will not make any number of possible mistakes) takes a tissue sample from a patient which might contain a tiny virus particle(s) much too small to be observed—and blows it up many times, so it can be seen. However, the test says nothing reliable about HOW MUCH virus is in the patient’s body. Why is that important? Because millions and millions of replicating virus in the body are necessary to even begin talking about actual illness. A positive PCR test, nevertheless, will be taken to mean the patient “has the epidemic disease.” —An even deeper issue: where is the PRIOR PROOF that the PCR is testing for a virus that actually causes disease?

The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) Begins Testing Americans for the Coronavirus—But How Reliable Are the Tests?

One in 50 school children with Autism: Gardasil greatest scandal of all time

1 in 50 School Children with Autism
May 5, 2015 —
The CDC just released a report <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr065.pdf> stating that the prevalence of autism
among school age children ages 6 to 17 years old is now 2%, or one out of every 50 children.
The time period covers 2007 to 2011-2012. Congressional hearings were convened to study
the issue of the alarming rise in autism in late 2012.

Congressman Dan Burton stated that the situation is “worse than an epidemic, it is an
absolute disaster.” Many questions were asked of the CDC at this hearing, which revealed
what many in the autism community already knew, such as the fact that there has never
been a study comparing vaccinated children with unvaccinated children, and
neither has there been a study on the effects of multiple dose vaccines in the
ever-rising vaccine schedule.
You can watch highlights of the hearing here <http://healthimpactnews.com/2012/video-highlights-from-first-congressional-hearing-on-autism-in-10-years/> . The US now leads all countries in the number
of vaccine doses given to children under the age of 6.

So why is there no current research being done by the government to investigate the
possible vaccine-autism link? The official response from the CDC is that they have studied
the issue, and they definitively state that there is no link. They also continue to state that
there is no link between the mercury-based vaccine ingredient thimerosal and autism,
but they removed it from most childhood vaccines sometime around 2001 “just to be safe.”
The annual flu vaccine still contains mercury, however, and is recommended for both
children and pregnant women.

Well, there are several problems to the CDC’s claims that they have investigated this issue.
First, it is public knowledge that one of their main researchers, Dr. Poul Thorsen, was indicted
for fraud for stealing millions of dollars in research grants to study the thimerosal mercury
link to autism. He is still on the run today and at large. He was an author in 36 studies with
the CDC on the issue of mercury in vaccines and autism . . . Full story: healthimpactnews.com <http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/cdc-now-admits-1-in-50-school-children-with-autism-time-to-stop-ignoring-the-vaccine-connection>

Comment: Merck’s former doctor predicts Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all time <http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/mercks-former-doctor-predicts-that-gardasil-will-become-the-greatest-medical-scandal-of-all-time/> .
Gardasil: the decision we will always regret <http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/gardasil-the-decision-we-will-always-regret> . Gardasil Vaccine: One More Girl Dead <http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/gardasil-vaccine-one-more-girl-dead> .