by Alexandra Bruce
One of the most forbidden topics on the planet right now is the connection between COVID-19 and 5G technology. Greg Reese does an incredible job of breaking the information down in this 3-minute video, transcribed below.
We know the prescribed PCR tests are not detecting the COVID-19 genome. According to the CDC’s own literature, the tests do not rule out bacterial infection or other viruses. They are detecting all varieties of coronavirus, including the common cold – and counting it as COVID-19.
And it has been pointed out for months that the geographical locations experiencing the most cases of COVID also seem to have active 5G technology. After a video went viral, in which David Icke suggested that 5G is somehow responsible for positive cases of COVID-19, YouTube deleted it and began deleting all videos on the subject, including a video we made, that pointed out how on October 30th of 2019, Wuhan became the first major testbed of 5G technology.
In late June, a new research paper entitled, “5G Technology and Induction of Coronavirus in Skin Cells” was published. This paper gives a scientific explanation of the relationship between 5G technology and the coronavirus.
Unlike 4G or other radio waves, the 5G millimeter waves can penetrate the nucleus of a cell. The DNA then acts as an inductor. It reacts to the 5G waves by producing an electromagnetic field. Like a shadow, the shape of the electromagnetic field reflects the hexagonal and pentagonal shapes of the DNA base pairs.
This electromagnetic field produces holes in the cellular liquid. hexagonal/pentagonal voids are created in the nucleoplasm. And to remedy this disturbance, extra bases are created to fill the voids. These bases then join together, to produce coronavirus-like structures in the cell, which will “read” as a positive case of COVID-19.
The exosome was discovered in 1983. Exosomes are created naturally within the cell to clean and repair cellular damage. Both exosomes and COVID-19 are the same size and shape. They both have the same ACE-2 receptor. And they both contain RNA.
Exosomes behave and appear the same as a virus. Some scientists even claim that the so-called virus is, in fact the exosome.
Since the discovery of the exosome, over 200 microbiologists have been murdered, committed suicide or died in a suspicious manner.
If you question this mystery, you’re undoubtedly labeled a “Conspiracy Theorist”. And if you question the unproven Virus Theory, you’re labeled a “Science Denier”.
The only socially-acceptable solution that you’re allowed to accept is an experimental vaccine that will alter your DNA, which ultimately raises the question, “Who owns your body?”
– Forbidden Knowledge TV
Australia following Deep State script to the letter
by Alex Bruce
This is a vaccine truth video, with some recent blurbs from two high-profile vaccine experts. It might pulled within 24 hours
Robert F Kennedy, Jr
It is impossible to make a vaccine that’s completely safe.
You are going to injure a certain amount of people.
Government is going to mandate this product.
No matter how grievous your injury or your child’s injury, no matter how toxic the ingredient, no matter how sloppy the line protocols, no matter how negligent that company, you cannot sue them for redress.
So, there’s no discovery, there’s no depositions, there’s no medical malpractice, there’s no class-actions. There’s zero consequence, if they kill you or if they injure you for life, that there’s no liability.
And for a every medical product, the biggest cost is paying liability at the back end. So they just said, “Now, that’s scrubbed. We don’t have to worry about that. We don’t have to safety test them.”
And there’s no reason to make it safe, because nobody can sue you, nobody can do discovery. There’s no consequence to giving you a really dangerous vaccine.
It’s almost mandatory consumption of that product.
It’s a gold mine.
If you can get a vaccine on the CDC schedule. It’s worth a billion dollars a year, typically to your company.
There was a Gold Rush and all of these companies rushed on CDC and captured the agency and got them to mandate all these vaccines.
Dr Andrew Kaufman
Some of the technological strategies that they’re using to create these vaccines are quite scary and unprecedented.
This vaccine doesn’t work in the way that, normally vaccines do, where you have a piece of a virus that’s inactivated in some way and inject that in, that causes an immune response and you would make antibodies to it.
They have to use a special technology. So, it’s not like a regular vaccine, where there’s just a syringe, with one needle and a liquid containing whatever’s in the vaccine and they just put it in.
This has three needles. So, the needle in the middle is the typical type, that the material would flow through but the other two needles on either side are actually electrodes and what they do is they generate an electric current inside of our cells and this creates what’s called electroporation.
And what happens is that the electricity causes the cell membranes to create little holes called pores and then, the genetic material can enter the cell through those pores whereas, normally the cell membrane would be a barrier and keep the genetic material outside the cells.
So, they’re using this technique and they’re basically – this is a form of gene therapy – so, they would actually be changing the genetic makeup of our own cells in the local area where they’re injecting this.
And I think this is something that could be used for all sorts of purposes that we may not know about, because we don’t really know what these genes represent.
Remember, I was talking about the source of this genetic material is undetermined.
The thing that keeps coming back to my mind, about Bill Gates; he made a statement to the effect of, “Through vaccines and family planning, we could reduce the world’s population by 15%.”
And 15% of the world’s population is somewhere around 1 billion people. Billion with a B.
And he certainly made other statements, recently that basically: “We will not be able to get back to any kind of ‘normalcy’ in our day-to-day lives.” And he specifically, mentioned things, like concerts or sporting events at arenas, where you have large gatherings of people – “until every single person is vaccinated.”
He’s also talking about having this “vaccination passport” or this tattoo or this ink, that shows you’ve had the vaccination and then that allows you like you to congregate, to travel on airplanes – almost put you in this high “social score” .
And yes, there is this invisible ink tattoo, which I believe was attempted to be implemented on some children in southern Africa – but was rejected by the local people there – rightfully so!
Here is the irrefutable proof that the Covid19 outbreak is not as bad as the common influenza in terms of mortality. Cairnsnews has been told by numerous medical staff at hospitals that the published death rates attributed to Coronavirus are inaccurate. A nurse who works at a large city hospital in Queensland said nearly every death is reported as having Coronavirus present but the virus did not cause the death. Doctors simply recorded the deaths as being from Coronavirus.
Similar to Italy whose Chief Scientist pleaded with the fake news to publish the truth. He said 88 per cent of hospital deaths were from an underlying, existing cause but had Coronavirus present in their systems and these patients died with Covid 19, just 12 per cent died from it.
From the US Centre for Disease Control:
While flu deaths in children are reported to CDC, flu deaths in adults are not nationally notifiable. In order to monitor influenza related deaths in all age groups, CDC tracks pneumonia and influenza (P&I)-attributed deaths through the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Mortality Reporting System. This system tracks the proportion of death certificates processed that list pneumonia or influenza as the underlying or contributing cause of death. This system provides an overall indication of whether flu-associated deaths are elevated, but does not provide an exact number of how many people died from flu.
During the 2017-2018 season, the percentage of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I) was at or above the epidemic threshold for 16 consecutive weeks. During the past five seasons, the average number of weeks this indicator was above threshold was 11 (range of 7 to 15 weeks). Nationally, mortality attributed to P&I exceeded 10.0% for four consecutive weeks, peaking at 10.8% during the week ending January 20, 2018.
As it does for the numbers of flu cases, doctor’s visits and hospitalizations, CDC also estimates deaths in the United States using mathematical modeling. CDC estimates that from 2010-2011 to 2013-2014, influenza-associated deaths in the United States ranged from a low of 12,000 (during 2011-2012) to a high of 56,000 (during 2012-2013). Death certificate data and weekly influenza virus surveillance information was used to estimate how many flu-related deaths occurred among people whose underlying cause of death on their death certificate included respiratory or circulatory causes. For more information, see Estimating Seasonal Influenza-Associated Deaths in the United States and CDC’s Disease Burden of Influenza page.
For more information, see Overview of Influenza Surveillance in the United States, “Mortality Surveillance.”
Letter to the Editor
It’s all a fake! – Citizens of Wuhan China call the corona virus “fake” its all fake
Here’s what the CDC says about the test for the Coronavirus
Straight from the horse’s mouth—both sides
—The CDC (US Center for Disease Control) admits the coronavirus test is flawed. That’s the overview and the takeaway—
As my readers know, I’ve described why the widespread diagnostic test for the coronavirus is insufficient, misleading, useless, and deceptive.
That test, used all over the world where it is available, is called the PCR.
It DIAGNOSES patients. “Yes, you have the virus.” “No you don’t.”
A very alert reader sent me a link to a US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) document about the test. The CDC establishes the guidelines for how the test should be done, and what the results mean.
Here is a CDC paragraph about results. I suggest you read it several times.
“Positive [test] results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”
I’m going to blow past the blatant contradiction in that CDC paragraph and cut to the chase.
The key line in that paragraph is: “The agent detected [the coronavirus] may not be the definite cause of disease.”
CDC: Yeah, you see, folks, ahem, the test could say the coronavirus is there in somebody’s body, but the virus may not be causing disease…
On one level, the CDC is admitting the test could turn up false positives: the test could SAY a patient has the coronavirus, but he really doesn’t.
This isn’t a footnote stuck at the bottom of a report. It’s right there near the top of the section about the meaning of the test.
On a deeper level, the CDC is saying straight out, IF THE TEST SHOWS A CORONAVIRUS IS PRESENT, THAT DOESN’T MEAN IT’S CAUSING DISEASE.
Well, yes, I’ve pointed out that the test has an inherent problem. At best, it might show that a virus is present in the patient’s body. But the test is incapable of determining HOW MUCH virus is ACTIVELY REPLICATING in the patient’s body.
And why is that important? Because, to even begin to say a virus is causing actual illness in a human, there would have to be millions and millions of a virus replicating in his body—and the PCR test has never been proven, in the real world, to be able to make such a judgment call accurately.
But, if you read that CDC quote again, you’ll see the CDC is ordering labs to report a positive test result to public health agencies—where it will be counted as a “coronavirus case” come hell or high water.
Thank you, CDC. So very, very much. The next ship for Uranus leaves tomorrow. Pile on board and make the trip. You can run tests there to your heart’s content.
Read on –
From Crisscross and No More Fake News
US CDC advertised for infectious disease quarantine officers November 2019 long before Wuhan Cov19 announcement
The US Centre for Disease Control has been caught out having prior knowledge of the Coronavirus epidemic by advertising for infectious diseases quarantine officers in November 2019, long before China told the world of the Wuhan outbreak. This revealing video exposes this terrible conspiracy in which Australia is perhaps an unwilling accomplice.
It has been alleged by Sydney psychiatrist Dr Russell McGregor that the Geelong Animal Health Research Institute was involved in the manufacture of the virus. He was struck off the medical register for his trouble.
Big pharma, which is attached to the CDC by an umbilical cord, stands to benefit immensely from the pandemic by releasing a new Cov19 vaccine on the market across the world.
It will make big pharma billions yet some researchers say it won’t work. Now vaccine skeptic Robert F Kennedy has jumped onboard the runaway crisis. Kennedy warned of dangerous vaccines for many years after his son became autistic, like about 2 per cent of all American kids after getting the MMR and other vaccines. He is warning against any newly developed Cov19 vaccine. The US has paid out $3.6 billion in vaccine damages over the past 20 years. Beware of any new or for that matter old flu vaccines.
Protect yourself with high strength Vitamin A & C and colloidal silver.
Virus testing by Criss Cross
The CDC program immediately raises two problems: why bother testing for a virus if it isn’t really causing human disease; and what kind of test is being done?
In this article, I’m focusing on the type of test, and whether it’s accurate, even if you assume the coronavirus is causing disease.
Reading through CDC literature (see also here), I believe the two most prevalent US testing methods are: antibody, and PCR.
Antibody tests are notorious for cross-reactions. This means factors in no way relevant to a given virus can make the test read positive. In that case, the patient would be falsely told he “has the coronavirus.” But it gets worse. Traditionally, antibody tests reading positive were taken as a good sign for the patient: his immune system had contacted a germ and defeated it. Then, starting in 1984, the science was turned upside down: a positive test was, astoundingly, taken to mean the patient was ill or would soon become ill.
The PCR test (which requires excellent technicians who will not make any number of possible mistakes) takes a tissue sample from a patient which might contain a tiny virus particle(s) much too small to be observed—and blows it up many times, so it can be seen. However, the test says nothing reliable about HOW MUCH virus is in the patient’s body. Why is that important? Because millions and millions of replicating virus in the body are necessary to even begin talking about actual illness. A positive PCR test, nevertheless, will be taken to mean the patient “has the epidemic disease.” —An even deeper issue: where is the PRIOR PROOF that the PCR is testing for a virus that actually causes disease?
1 in 50 School Children with Autism
May 5, 2015 — The CDC just released a report <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr065.pdf> stating that the prevalence of autism
among school age children ages 6 to 17 years old is now 2%, or one out of every 50 children.
The time period covers 2007 to 2011-2012. Congressional hearings were convened to study
the issue of the alarming rise in autism in late 2012.
Congressman Dan Burton stated that the situation is “worse than an epidemic, it is an
absolute disaster.” Many questions were asked of the CDC at this hearing, which revealed
what many in the autism community already knew, such as the fact that there has never
been a study comparing vaccinated children with unvaccinated children, and
neither has there been a study on the effects of multiple dose vaccines in the
ever-rising vaccine schedule.
You can watch highlights of the hearing here <http://healthimpactnews.com/2012/video-highlights-from-first-congressional-hearing-on-autism-in-10-years/> . The US now leads all countries in the number
of vaccine doses given to children under the age of 6.
So why is there no current research being done by the government to investigate the
possible vaccine-autism link? The official response from the CDC is that they have studied
the issue, and they definitively state that there is no link. They also continue to state that
there is no link between the mercury-based vaccine ingredient thimerosal and autism,
but they removed it from most childhood vaccines sometime around 2001 “just to be safe.”
The annual flu vaccine still contains mercury, however, and is recommended for both
children and pregnant women.
Well, there are several problems to the CDC’s claims that they have investigated this issue.
First, it is public knowledge that one of their main researchers, Dr. Poul Thorsen, was indicted
for fraud for stealing millions of dollars in research grants to study the thimerosal mercury
link to autism. He is still on the run today and at large. He was an author in 36 studies with
the CDC on the issue of mercury in vaccines and autism . . . Full story: healthimpactnews.com <http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/cdc-now-admits-1-in-50-school-children-with-autism-time-to-stop-ignoring-the-vaccine-connection>
Comment: Merck’s former doctor predicts Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all time <http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/mercks-former-doctor-predicts-that-gardasil-will-become-the-greatest-medical-scandal-of-all-time/> .
Gardasil: the decision we will always regret <http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/gardasil-the-decision-we-will-always-regret> . Gardasil Vaccine: One More Girl Dead <http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/gardasil-vaccine-one-more-girl-dead> .