Blog Archives

At UN summit, world rulers adopt agenda for global socialism

Get us out of the United Nations

www.thenewamerican.com  – Written by 

At UN Summit, World Rulers Adopt Agenda for Global Socialism

Photo of President Barack Obama speaking at the UN Summit on Sustainable Development Sept. 27: AP Images

 A far-reaching United Nations plot to re-engineer civilization and impose global socialism on humanity, variously dubbed “Agenda 2030” and the “Sustainable Development Agenda,” was ushered in on Friday with a “thunderous standing ovation,” the UN Department of Public Information reported. Every one of the 193 UN member governments on the planet — from communist and Islamist dictatorships to those ruling what remains of the “Free World” — vowed to help impose the UN’s controversial goals on their subjects. Indeed, according to the UN and the global agreement itself, not a single human being will be allowed to escape what one prominent internationalist ominously referred to as the next “Great Leap Forward.”

That the UN Agenda 2030’s 17 so-called “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) and its accompanying 169 targets are essentially a recipe for global socialism and corporatism is hardly open for dispute, as countless analysts have pointed out in recent weeks. Goal number 10, for example, calls on the UN, national governments, and every person on Earth to “reduce inequality within and among countries.” To do that, the agreement continues, will “only be possible if wealth is shared and income inequality is addressed.” The brutal communist dictatorship ruling mainland China even boasted of its “crucial role” in creating the UN agenda. But as the UN document makes clear, national socialism to “combat inequality” domestically is simply not enough — international socialism is needed to battle inequality even “among” countries.

In other words, Western taxpayers: Prepare to be fleeced so that your wealth can redistributed internationally. Of course, as has been the case for generations, most of the wealth extracted from the productive sector in what remains of the free world will be redistributed to the UN and Third World regimes — not the victims of those regimes, impoverished largely through domestic socialist policies imposed by the same corrupt regimes that will be propped up with more Western aid. More than a few governments and dictators also announced that they would be “aligning their national development plans with the Sustainable Development Agenda,” essentially ensuring a growing supply of poor people to exploit as a pretext for more UN-led global socialism.

The UN document, formally entitled “Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” was adopted on Friday, September 25, at the start of the UN’s three-day Summit on Sustainable Development in New York. Speaking at the opening ceremony of the confab, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon hinted at just how far-reaching the plot really is. “The new agenda is a promise by leaders to all people everywhere,” he explained, presumably conflating “leaders” with mass-murdering gangsters such as Kim Jong Un, Raul Castro, and Robert Mugabe who somehow managed to seize control over entire nations. “It is a universal, integrated and transformative vision for a better world.”

As with all socialist and totalitarian schemes, the UN’s controversial agenda was marketed using vague, meaningless platitudes such as, for example, creating a “better” world, and “ending” poverty — common slogans among tyrants stretching back centuries. “It is an agenda for people, to end poverty in all its forms,” continued Ban. “It is an agenda for shared prosperity, peace and partnership [that] conveys the urgency of climate action [and] is rooted in gender equality and respect for the rights of all. Above all, it pledges to leave no one behind.” But the “true test of commitment to Agenda 2030,” he added, will be in its implementation. “We need action from everyone, everywhere,” Ban said, pointing to the “guide” offered by the 17 SDGs. “They are a to-do list for people and planet, and a blueprint for success.”

“Now,” Ban continued, “we must use the goals to transform the world.” “Institutions will have to become fit for a grand new purpose,” he said. “We must engage all actors, as we did in shaping the Agenda. We must include parliaments and local governments, and work with cities and rural areas. We must rally businesses and entrepreneurs. We must involve civil society in defining and implementing policies — and give it the space to hold us to account. We must listen to scientists and academia. We will need to embrace a data revolution. Most important, we must set to work — now.”

Whether the world’s adults can be persuaded to willingly join the UN’s bandwagon remains to be seen. But when it comes to children, the UN is taking no chances, devoting an entire “goal” in its agenda to ensuring that all children, everywhere, are transformed into what the UN calls “agents of change” ready to push forward the plan for the new global order. “Children and young women and men are critical agents of change and will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world,” the UN goals explain.

The sort of activists that the UN hopes to make your children into is also explicitly defined in the unanimously adopted agreement. “By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development,” the global plan for 2030 states. Considering what the UN means by “sustainable development” — population control, central planning, global governance, and more — the agenda for your children takes on an even more sinister tone.

It all sounded so wonderful to some of the world’s most brutal dictators, though, that they could hardly contain their glee about the coming brave new world. “This agenda promises a brave new world [sic], a new world which we have to consciously construct, a new world that calls for the creation of a new global citizen,” gushed Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe, the genocidal mass-murderer enslaving Zimbabwe who also serves as chairman of the African Union. “I want to believe that we are up to this task that we have voluntarily and collectively committed ourselves to. Our success, and in particular the promise of a new world that awaits us, depends upon this commitment.” He also promised to vigorously impose the UN Agenda 2030 on the starving and impoverished victims his regime lords over.

The brutal tyrants ruling Communist China, meanwhile, have also been enthusiastic cheerleaders for the UN goals — goals that the regime boasted it played a “crucial role” in developing. Among other “commitments,” the dictatorship promised to spend $2 billion in foreign countries to meet the UN goals in “education” and “health,” with its funding increasing to $12 billion by 2030. While only contributing a small piece of the pie — the UN claims its agenda will cost somewhere between $3 trillion to $5 trillion per year — the fact that Beijing is so excited about the agenda is quite revealing. Echoing Chairman Mao’s rhetoric, EU and NATO globalist Javier Solana said that, “With a sustained commitment from all countries, developed and developing alike, the world can ensure that it celebrates another great leap forward in 2030.”

The Obama administration, which apparently does not plan to present the UN scheme to the U.S. Senate for ratification as required by the U.S. Constitution, also offered a forceful defense of the UN agenda. Speaking to the UN summit on Sunday after purporting to commit the United States to the global plot, Obama claimed the UN blueprint “is one of the smartest investments we can make in our own future.” He told the assembled dictators and government representatives that 800 million people live on less than $1.25 per day, without, of course, mentioning the reasons for so much poverty: Big Government policies that are remarkably similar in many ways to the UN’s new agenda. Obama, who has waged multiple unconstitutional wars, also claimed that “military interventions might have been avoided over the years” if governments had only taken better care of their hapless citizens.

Even the world’s leading religious figure, Pope Francis, addressed UN member governments with a plea to support the UN goals. “The adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development at the World Summit, which opens today, is an important sign of hope,” he said. It is worth noting, however, that not everybody within the Catholic Church hierarchy was quite as enthusiastic about the scheme. In their “Common Declaration of the Bishops of Africa and Madagascar” ahead of the UN summit, for example, Africa’s bishops blasted the “agents of the civilization of death” and called for much of the scheming to stop. “We implore you to end the filthy campaigns that promote a civilization of death on our continent,” they said, slamming the “terrifying resurgence of a colonialist spirit under the guise of the appealing names of liberty, equality, rights, autonomy, democratization and development.”

Beyond governments and religious figures, much of the private sector also enthusiastically backed the new goals. Among the mega-corporations backing the scheme are the world’s top three search engines: Google, Microsoft’s Bing, and Yahoo. It was not immediately clear whether those corporations’ support for the UN agenda would affect the supposed impartiality of search results, but critics of the UN plan expressed alarm nonetheless. As The New American reported in May, meanwhile, top media outlets around the world are also participating in a massive propaganda campaign to support the UN agenda.

Of course, Obama has no constitutional or statutory authority to commit the American people to the UN’s radical blueprint for humanity. But unless the GOP majority in Congress is willing to stop funding the administration’s antics, there can be no doubt that the White House will charge ahead using its pen, phone, and taxpayer funding provided by Republican members of Congress. Lawmakers who are serious about their oath of office must work to restrain the Obama administration, and ultimately withdraw the U.S. government’s membership from the UN. Faced with a totalitarian UN agenda for global socialism under the guise of “sustainable development,” now would be an excellent time to get busy.

The treachery of the LNP/ALP nexus – Lima treaty winds down manufacturing and production by 30%

THE LIMA DECLARATION AN OVERVIEW

  •  How does it effect you and your family?
  •  What is the Lima declaration?

The correct title is:-  Lima Declaration and plan of Action on Industrial Development and Co-operation

agenda21logoIt is an international trade agreement similar to G.A.T.T, (General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs), Australia is a signatory to The Lima Declaration as it is to many GATT agreements.

Australia signed The Lima Agreement with the total support of all major political parties and no consultation with we the people.

It should be clearly understood that the ‘Lima Declaration’ is one of many hundreds of international agreements and treaties signed by Australian Public Servants, usually by The Minister for Foreign Affairs or nominee, who signs on behalf of all Australians.

It should also be clearly understood that 99,9.% of Australians do not know what such agreements and treaties are about, nor how they effect their lives, and they are not told, if they were, there would be instant riot.

International treaties in the main are the handy work of the United Nations and have been used by Australian Governments to undermine Australian Sovereignty.  The High Court decision on the Franklin Dam issue in Tasmania is a case in point.  Used to put in place processes the impact of which the Australian ~op l e are completely unaware, and if they were aware, would be totally opposed to, processes that “get- around”  “The Australian Commonwealth Constitution.”  In other words, treason.  And treason is being committed in the name of International Treaty, or the other names given to them, such as conventions, or in this case declaration, The Lima Declaration.

You may say treason is a strong word, but after reading this brief you will say it is not strong enough, without doubt sufficient reason to impeach the Australian Government and opposition on charges of Treason.

A copy of The Lima Declaration may be obtained from the United Nations in your Capital City, or the department of Foreign Affairs in Canberra, by phoning the treaties support unit on (06) 261 3590 .

While you are on the phone ask them how many treaties, declarations, conventions, etc exist.  Ask for copies.  Ask for the complete set.

You may say treason is a strong word, but after reading this brief you will say it is not strong enough, without doubt sufficient reason to impeach the Australian Government and opposition on charges of treason.

Read the full brief [HERE]

Nationwide Reclaim rallies shake the political foundations!

by Nick Folkes –29/07/2015

rally-terrorist-sydney-2-2015

Rally in Sydney

Last weekend’s nationwide Reclaim rallies shook the foundations of the treasonous political establishment. Never before has the public witnessed such a firestorm of verbal hate and bigotry emanating from the pampered multicultural lobby and political elites who are finally being challenged for not listening to the peoples’ concerns. The Australian people are fed up with the failed policies of mass third world immigration, the foreign sell-off of Australia, failed political ideology of Islam and the preferential treatment given to those seeking ethnic privilege in the soiled state sanctioned multicultural industry.

Sydney Rally - (image courtesy of google)

Sydney Rally – (image courtesy of google)

Thousands of patriotic Australians took to the streets exercising their freedom of speech in a peaceful and dignified way. Regrettably, the nationwide Reclaim rallies were countered by a brutish collective of anarchists, communists and nappy clad students who were intend on inflicting violent physical attacks on their peaceful opponents. The violence and hatred manifested itself particularly in Melbourne where alcohol and drug fuelled mobs of anarchists and communists attacked protestors, Police and innocent bystanders resulting in many arrests.

The collective of ‘useful idiots’ representing failed anarchist and communist rabble, the militant gay lobby and ‘tolerate’ Muslims banded together in a marriage of convenience to strike a blow against peace loving Australians. The ‘useful idiots’ were on a violent rampage displaying their totalitarian nature and hatred of freedom and democracy.

The treasonous political elite and multicultural industry are both up in arms, totally shocked that their genocidal ideology and morally corrupt policies are being exposed and challenged. The response from the decadent and self-serving elites proves that they are removed from the daily struggles of life that most Australians face. Many politicians have come out publicly pouring scorn on patriotic Australians who attended nationwide rallies calling them “bigots” and “racists” for merely exercising their freedom of speech, again highlighting the disconnect and lack of natural affection shown by arrogant politicians who are not interested in trying to read or understand the peoples’ concerns.

George Christensen MP  (image courtesy of google)

Only one sitting member of the federal parliament broke ranks and spoke at a Reclaim rally in Mackay, MP George Christensen. He spoke passionately about his opposition to the repressive ideology of Islam, sharia law and affection for free speech. Opposition ‘leader’ Bill Shorten attacked Christensen for exercising his freedom of speech but Christensen wasn’t fazed by the old, lazy communist but he was disappointed and surprised at the “tidal wave of hyperventilation and confected outrage on social media”.

The week prior to the nationwide Reclaim rallies, the University of Western Sydney (UWS) hosted a conference entitled ‘Advancing Community Cohesion – Towards a National Compact 2015’. The taxpayer funded two-day do-gooder extravaganza was held to “examine international best practices for dealing with national and local issues regarding social cohesion”. In other words, the rampantly divisive ‘multicultural gravy train’ and its commissars are worried about the lack of social cohesion in Australia and they are searching for ways to counter the growing movement opposing the policy of ‘cultural & heritage genocide’. The quiver lipped cultural charlatans must be having nightmares about the impending collapse of the policy and the possible loss of their highly paid, and irrelevant existence. Multiculturalism is not ‘natural’, it is a policy of ethnic and socialist privilege that has created a hierarchy of over-paid swindling big eaters who have one mission; destroy the Anglo nation and replace it with a ‘meaningless state of no patriotism or heritage’.

Nick Kaldas  (image courtesy of google)

Regrettably, Deputy NSW Police Commissioner Nick Kaldas, the police force spokesman on cultural diversity or ‘cultural genocide’ listed “far right extremism and rallies which encourage divisive notions of us and them” as some of the biggest challenges facing his troops. Kaldas born in Egypt of Coptic Christian heritage has spat in the face of Anglo-Australians who welcomed his family to Australia escaping the diverse cultural hellhole of a Muslim dominated nation. I’m sure most Copts in Australia wouldn’t be so rude and ungrateful in the way Kaldas attacked patriotic Australians who said, ‘we’re fed up with state sanctioned multiculturalism and incompatible large scale third world immigration’. Does he expect Australians to lubricate their backsides and walk backwards down the ethnically privileged ghettoes of Lakemba or Cabramatta in fifth gear?

Another conference seat warmer Dr. Anne Aly, a “counter terrorism expert” from Curtin University said, “violent extremism in Australia is beginning to mirror that of the US” – what a lie! Aly highlighted a report from leftist think tank ‘New America Foundation’ in which a selective report tries to fabricate the usual leftist position of manufacturing right-wing threats, fear and propaganda. The report entitled, ‘Deadly Attacks Since 9/11’ lists 26 people killed in ‘deadly Jihadist attacks’ and 48 people killed in ‘deadly right wing attacks’ in America. The selectiveness of the vulnerable left is on display again. If the report was produced by balanced and honest citizens it would have listed the 2,996 people murdered in the 9/11 Muslim terrorist attacks which would change the statistics to ‘3,022 people killed in ‘deadly Jihadist attacks’ since 2001 in America.

Dr Anne Aly   (image courtesy of google)

Dr. Anne Aly is no stranger to selective thinking when trying to portray “right wing extremism” as our enemy when it is abundantly evident that Muslim, leftist or anarchist groups have killed far more ‘innocent people’ than a few ‘right wing’ nutters. This is the same Anne Aly who said, “Don’t call Man Haron Monis a terrorist – it only helps ISIS” but more recently said, “Chapel Hill Shooting ticks all boxes for terrorism. Violent extremism has many faces”. Dear oh dear, Anne should pick up a dictionary from her local discount bookshop. Man Monis was driven to murder by the world’s most murderous and intolerant ideology so it is fair to label him a ‘Muslim terrorist’.

Dr. Anne Aly’s selective twitter comments:

twitter-ally

The worldwide statistics compiled by National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), a US government organization that provides information on known terrorist groups and individual terrorists and is also a knowledge bank says otherwise. The chart entitled, ‘Grouped By Perpetrator Characteristics’ gives a more balanced and honest view of the extent of terrorism in the world from 2001 to 2010. It is clear to see that Muslims and Anarchist individuals and groups are the real danger to peace and security, not a few beer swilling ‘White Supremacists’. The left needs to stop playing politics and accept the truth; that their deranged Muslim and Anarchist brethren are the ‘real extremists’.

National Counterterrorism Centre (NCTC) data on worldwide extremist groups:

terrorist-stats

Well-known Oriental supremacist, Race Commissioner ‘Trivial’ Tim Soutphommasane reached a new level of heightened stupidity when he said, “White supremacists” may become bolder in the future. Oh really, could this highly paid cultural commissar name one “white supremacist” organisation that is supposedly threatening the nation? Tim went further saying, “The last thing we would want to see is physical violence involving racism in our streets and in our suburbs”, I agree so I challenge Tim and the old tired Soviet relic called the Australian Human (less) Rights Commission (AHRC) to make a public statement requesting Police and other government agencies urgently address the growing issue of ethnic gang violence in our suburbs. The real victims are Anglo Australians who are targeted, bashed and raped by Muslim, African and Islander gangs. The unpatriotic left’s failed attempt at manufacturing a false scenario is pitiful and laughable at the best.

The angst coming from the political establishment over the nationwide Reclaim rallies is worthy of scorn. The Reclaim organising committee has made it abundantly clear in its media releases and also on social media that it will not ‘racial hatred or violence’ at its rallies. At the last Reclaim Sydney rally, there was a sea of unprejudiced patriotism coming from a diverse audience of Australians, many from migrant backgrounds. How refreshing to be joined by patriotic Australians of varying backgrounds whom identity and love this nation as much as I do. Many migrants have also rejected multiculturalism and the plethora of second-rate executive garbage emanating from Canberra.

The treasonous political establishment should hang their head in shame at trying to manufacture a red flag scenario branding patriots as “right wing extremists” or “white supremacists” for attending the Reclaim rallies. The pinko social engineers and the sooty-faced intellectual Bolshies are the real ‘racist extremists’ who should apologise to the Australian people for forty years of multicultural failure. We deserve better than to see our nation and its people fractured over some stupid Marxist dream of a utopian society based on preference, division and intolerance.

The nationwide Reclaim rallies have made Australian political history. Never before have we witnessed such a magnitude of patriotic Aussies taking to the streets exercising their freedom of speech. I’ve never seen so many different patriotic political groups; parties and individuals come together in unity under one banner before, what a great development. There will always be differences in methodology or delivery of the message but together we can create a new political paradigm that actually represents our interests and continues to challenge the status quo.

Over the past few months Party for Freedom activists have been targeted and physically attacked by anarchists and communists at rallies so it was indeed comforting to know Police were going to be present at Sunday’s rally. It is insane to think that any protestor could be in danger of being attacked for their political beliefs but the loony far left is driven by anger and intolerance and these ‘useful idiots’ will do anything possible to deny patriotic Australians their right to express their political beliefs.

Antifa attack Patriots, again

The attacks and intimidation perpetrated by the drug fuelled mobs of anarchists and communists on Party for Freedom members and supporters will not deter us from continuing our activism. On Sunday, 19th July, a group of Party for Freedom members and supporters met at the Queen Victoria building prior to the Reclaim rally as we planned to form a procession walking from the QVB to the designated Reclaim rally area at the top of Martin Place. A returning group of patriots from the Melbourne Reclaim rally also joined us at the QVB for the walk to the rally. We were very fortunate to have a Police escort to Martin Place, which provided the protection needed as we marched through the streets of Sydney to our final location.

As we walked through the streets, quite a few mentally challenged Stalinists and Maoists tried to breach the Police line formed around us but were held back further infuriating them. In childish retaliation, our aggressive opponents directed verbal threat and taunts at Police and protestors. Our opponents carried cheaply made cardboard placards with crayon drawn “anti-racism” slogans on them. The left has been using the “anti-racism” theme to compensate for their violence and hate, and today was going to be no different. The left has no capacity to debate, just intimidate and destroy.

As we approached Martin Place, we could hear the Reclaim crowd cheering in the distance. The volatile lefties were still yelling the same irrelevant slogans as we walked into Martin Place. It was impressive to see a large crowd of patriotic Aussies listening intently to guest speaker Pastor Danny Nalliah, President of the ‘Rise Up Australia’ political party speak about the disaster that is Islam. Danny is no stranger to controversy; in 2002 his ministry ran a seminar entitled ‘Insight into Islam’. At the seminar, Danny who is well versed in Islam spoke about the violent texts of the Koran and the danger the Islamic political ideology poses to Western nations. Unknown to Danny was the presence of “Australian” Muslim converts in the audience who later lodged a complaint with the then Victorian Equal Opportunity Commission on the premise of “religious intolerance”. The Victorian Opportunity Commission demanded an apology from Danny but he rightly refused on the grounds that what he said was from the Koran. Regrettably, Danny was forced to face the tribunal in a very costly case. Danny was finally vindicated after many two years of legal wrangling pushed by the Islamic Council of Victoria. Danny proved that the Koran is ‘hate speech’ in its purest form.

There were quite a few other speakers who touched on their concerns about Australia’s collapse into the abyss. It seemed everyone was in agreement about the failings of multiculturalism and the unfortunate advance of Islam in Australia. Shermon Burgess of UPF spoke about the unfolding violence perpetrated by anarchist and communist thugs in Melbourne at the previous day’s rally. Again, protestors were targeted by the ‘violent loving’ authoritarian thugs who attacked countless protestors and innocent bystanders. After the Melbourne rally, a group of patriots went to a local pub for a few celebratory ales but were attacked when the chartered bus was about to leave. The unwashed ferals ambushed patriots who were on the bus, pelting the bus with large rocks smashing the front window screen. The boys got off the bus to defend the passengers from further attacks. When the anarchist thugs were confronted, they ran away in a cowardly fashion.

Patriots attended the Reclaim rallies to voice their frustrations and concerns about the present disastrous direction pushed by treasonous government unlike the anarchists & communists who showed up, not to counter our political platform but to engage in physical battle proving that they are motivated by violence and hatred.

The rally was well organised and the presence of the NSW Police gave peaceful Reclaim protestors the security needed. The Police contained the rat bag collective of feral filth just one block away forming Police lines to make sure the feral bog stench could not breach the Police lines.

After the rally, the protestors dispersed pretty quickly to avoid possible dramas with the methadone fuelled anarcho-pinko thugs. It was time to move and the Police kindly gave a group of Party for Freedom activists’ police protection when walking back to our vehicles. Anarchists and communists who were no doubt looking for us rudely interrupted our walk. Once the screaming children of the left spotted us, their behaviour became instantly aggressive with them turning the corner towards us in the hope of breaking the Police line to attack us.

Police Escort

" "

“Anarchists at Work ” -(image courtesy of google)

Fortunately, there was a Police van nearby. The back doors of the Police van swung open and we were told to get inside the vehicle while other Police detained the aggressive mob. The anarchists and communists were in the background screaming for our blood. Once inside the van, we travelled down Market Street passing the motley gang of thugs. We drove in style and protection while our aggressive opponents were kept at bay. We arrived at our destination safe and sound ‘thanks’ to the efforts of the NSW Police.

Party for Freedom would like to say ‘THANK YOU’ to the good men and women of the New South Wales Police Force for doing an excellent job in maintaining order and keeping the peace despite the difficult and volatile environment.

And, we would also like to thank the Reclaim organizing committee for their diligent work in coordinating successful nationwide rallies.

Reclaim Sydney rally pictures: https://partyforfreedom.smugmug.com/Reclaim-Rally-Sydney/

  

‘Ode To Australia

Farewell to Australia, just two hundred years old,

Your heritage fought for, now has been sold,

by wimps we entrust, they’re changing the mould.

The spirit of ‘ANZAC’ and ‘DIGGERS’ so bold,

beats in the heart of we who are old.

For they who have no sacrifice made,

do sell our heritage, tho’ it were trade.

What of the ‘ANZACS’ the DIGGERS’ tradition?

The quisling wimps have no definition.

Oh! What a time to run out of ammunition.

(By: J. John 39-45 veteran)

Disgraced Australian Government Solicitor Drug Dealer Guilty Plea

Nicholaos-Gouliaditas-6A deafening media silence is shrouding the admission of guilt tendered to the court this week by Nicholas Gouliaditis, Senior General Counsel, Senior Executive Lawyer, Senior Lawyer at the office of the Australian Government Solicitors with sentencing set down for this Friday, April 24th 9.30 am at the Downing Centre, Sydney.

Nick Gouliaditis, 34, was arrested on Thursday 21st August 2014 in front of colleagues at his office in Martin Place, Sydney where he works as a senior executive lawyer with the Australian Government Solicitor – the agency that provides legal advice to the government. He was in possession of three grams of ice, an ice pipe, scales, numerous resealable plastic bags, and a large amount of cash following a two-month investigation into an alleged Sydney drug ring.

Nicholaos-Gouliaditas-1Gouliaditis now pleads guilty as charged with dealing and possessing drugs, resisting arrest, dealing in the proceeds of crime and possessing a prohibited weapon. When the police searched his home in Newtown and allegedly found a stun gun and liquid believed to be GHB.

This solicitor was suspended from his current role at the AGS when after a two month investigation Police alleging Gouliaditis sold a total of 500ml of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and 13.8 grams of methamphetamine (ice) to undercover officers on several occasions between 30 July and 13 August also included telephone intercepts as well as physical and electronic surveillance.

Ramifications to current and past case files handled by Gouliaditis in his roll as the most senior Australian Government Solicitor presents a mine field of litigation problems to the Federal Government moving to damage control.

Nicholaos-Gouliaditas- video ABC

Pic from video ABC Landline

Known for dismissing problems under spin doctors orders applied with a thick coat of government whitewash may not suffice this time when Gouliaditis was arrested at his government employer’s offices in Sydney with the drug ice in his possession and a pipe to smoke it with.

Our investigations over the past 14 months have revealed some very high profile court cases still in the system seeking massive compensation where Gouliaditis represented the Australian Government defence.

At the Downing Centre Courts in Sydney Tomorrow Friday 24th April 2015 will reveal an adjudicating judge under extreme pressure to consider every case Gouliaditis has headed or played a significant role in will be tainted.

Nicholaos-Gouliaditas-4 Nicholaos-Gouliaditas-2

Picture from Google Images

Andrew’s Periscope Crap from the Crypt in Canberra

Poli-Waffle Government bull & Spin banner

Competitive Evaluation Process

The Ministers coded message is delivered in this video

The Minister for Defence, Mr. Kevin Andrews, has certainly practised the mandatory pollie skill of speaking much, meaning little, thus sidelining his real intentions.  He has managed to elevate to the next level, in that he has not only confused the public, but the rest of the Government with respect to the Submarine tendering process, or whatever else he may have been thinking.

The Submarines shall no doubt be build overseas, with the decision more than likely already set in concrete. The latest assumed tendering requirement, being the “Competitive evaluation process”, probably already excludes Australian builders anyway, as any such analysis would probably declare us lacking competence in manufacture, and ability to hold to time and budget.  Why do we need twelve conventional submarines anyway, in a nuclear world???

However, many have attempted to root out the cleverly concealed meaning within the statement, the code of which required considerable decoding.  Bringing confusion to a complete Government, most of whom are members of the legal fraternity, is no mean feat.

I have studied this statement and believe I may be able to elucidate and offer up some understanding:  “The Submarine project should be so structured, such that it maximises the probability of project success and minimises the cost and time required for the philosophy of commonality and standardisation”.  I hope this helps; even Mr Andrews to understand that which he said.  As a resultant implication, there must exist, the characterisation of specific criteria.

This should qualify me for at least a seat on the backbench.  Amen.

John Bushell.
Golden Grove, SA. 5125

Help Debt Free Australia

debt-free-poster

Islamic Nigab, Bike Helmet and KKK Test Canberra Security

Ku Klux Klan protest at Parliament House

Protesters of the Faceless group
Protesters of the ‘Faceless’ group –
A group of men wearing a Ku Klux Klan outfit, a motorbike helmet and a Muslim niqab have tried to enter Parliament House in Canberra to argue in favour of a nationwide ban on the burqa.

They were met by a security official outside the building, who advised the men that the helmet and the KKK hat were not allowed inside.

He told the protester wearing the niqab that his face would have to be revealed during the normal security screening process.

The media was unable to witness the security process, but all three men emerged without their head coverings.

“It seems that you’re allowed to wear a full-faced covering into Parliament if you’re a Muslim woman, but no other group is allowed to have that same privilege,” Sergio Redegalli told reporters.

“We, as males, are not allowed to wear any face coverings in Parliament House.”

Under new Parliament House security rules, Muslim women wearing a burqa are allowed inside once they have shown their face at the normal security checkpoint.

Speaker Bronwyn Bishop last week backed down from a plan to force Muslim women wearing the burqa to sit behind glass enclosures when in the parliamentary chamber.

Today’s protest was organised by a group called Faceless.

Members of the ‘Faceless’ group wearing face coverings are seen leaving Parliament House in Canberra. Protesters of the ‘Faceless’ group came Parliament House wearing face coverings advocating for a nationwide burqa ban. Photo: AAP

Mr Redegalli said it was “fantastic” that they were not allowed inside the building with facial coverings, but argued it should be applied to everyone.

“The next time, the next group of people that go to any security point to be asked to identify themselves – it may be too late because they’re already in Parliament,” he said.

“No-one should be walking up the [parliamentary] forecourt or in [the] public domain hidden from sight.”

Faceless group previously ‘tested security’ at NSW Parliament

It is not the first time the group has pulled a similar stunt.

In 2012, Faceless members walked through the Sydney CBD to “test security” at various buildings, including the New South Wales Parliament.

It caused tension between local Muslim groups.

A number of federal Coalition MPs – including Liberal senator Cory Bernardi – have been pushing for a ban on the burka inside Parliament House, arguing there are security and identity issues with the facial covering.

In 2011, Senator Bernardi praised Mr Redegalli – who was today wearing the KKK outfit – as a “friend” and someone who has become “an eloquent spokesman for freedom of speech”.

“I happen to agree with Mr Redegalli that the burka has no place in Australia,” Senator Bernardi said in 2011.

“I consider it a security risk and a symbol of repression and Islamic fundamentalism.

“Many Muslims [and opinion polls suggest a vast majority of other Australians] agree with me.”

At the time, Mr Redegalli was under attack for painting a “Say no to burkas” mural on his Sydney glass sculpting studio.

He made clear today that he found the KKK outfit offensive, but said he was wearing it to make a point about facial coverings in public

Australia Post donates $2m to Islamic Museum of Australia

Australia Post chief executive Ahmed Fahour is patron of the Islamic Museum of Australia.

Mr Fahour – a former CEO of NAB and Citigroup – was paid $4.8 million last year as chief executive officer and managing director of Australia Post, which is 100 per cent Government-owned.

AUSTRALIA Post donated more than $2 million to an ­Islamic museum.

The donation was made months ago, but has only emerged now, when Australia Post is sacking 900 staff to stem the losses at its domestic mail division.

Australia post is to cut service to save money, there is a positive way they can save $4.8 million dollars immediately and recover a further $2 million by sacking just one person … how many standard postage stamp go into $6.8 million ?

Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns – YouTube

They are taking your guns under a ruse of preventing war, the United Nations are behind this to make sure they are the only ones with guns and we n\know what they do when that happens they start shooting….

Massacre fall out Lake Gregory

lake gregory 3On October 30th hundreds of Arabian Brumbies at Lake Gregory were shot from the air by a sniper, hired from the Dept. of Agriculture and using a helicopter paid for with tax payers money.

This ‘cull’ had been ordered by the Pastoral Lands Board, a section of the Dept of Rural Development and Lands in Western Australia, which delegates pastoral leases.

The lease of Lake Gregory Station is held by the Aboriginal Lands Trust, a section of the Department of Aboriginal Affairs.

A private pastoralist has asked to sub-lease Lake Gregory from the ALT to put cattle out for the live export trade.

Excuses touted by government for this ‘cull’ were that there were too many horses

Pastoral Lands Board, Rob Gillam said 9,000, Dept.Aboriginal Affairs said 5,620,

The Aboriginal Community members said up to 2,000.

Wild Horses Kimberley had 2 teams drive around the entire area twice and counted

up to a mere 500.

A second excuse by government was that horses were getting stuck in mud.

Wild Horses Kimberley asked the ALT 5 years ago to invest in equipment to create safe water points around the lake and get old bores running again; nothing happened.

Horses attempted to get water from a dam at Balgo because the troughs next to the dam hadn’t been filled by the residents.

A third excuse by government was that ‘overgrazing’ was occurring. They thought that horses were eating grasses that should have been available for cattle. But scientific proof shows that horses only eat the tops of grasses and cattle eat the lower areas. Cattle and horses can exist together.(Princeton University study-see WHK website). Government now plans to put thousands more cattle onto this area. This will cause massive environmental damage to the lake as cattle wallow in water and trample flora.

After the ‘cull’ horses were left dying. Dept. Agriculture estimated that about 1% did not die after the initial shot. This means that many horses suffered agonizing slow death in 40d heat.

RSPCA, which supported the aerial ‘cull’ has not found an excuse for this.

Reports from the lake say that

*dead horses have been left everywhere and are contaminating the area, including the water for the remaining horses, cattle, wildlife, birds and fish.

*requests for funds to get old bores working to provide fresh water have been ignored.

*requests to humanely manage horse numbers using infertility drug Pzp on mares and gelding, stallions, passive trapping for re-homing, have all been ignored.

The Lake Gregory horses are a valuable asset to the three Aboriginal Communities living at Lake Gregory. Introduced Arabians at Balgo by the Pallotine priest Father John McGuire have developed into strong bloodlines which the Sheik of Dubai, Mohamed bin Rashid al Maktoum sought out and managed to take 13 Lake Gregory horses to Dubai for endurance riding in 2007. Most of these horses live near Mulan where the people have grown up respecting and loving their horses. At the third community Mindibungu (Bililuna) the Percheron bloodlines were introduced along with Arabians to produce very big heavy strong horses, much valued by horsemen all over the world.

Wild Horses Kimberley will continue to save and protect the wild horses, raising funds to provide safe areas where they can be managed and allowed to run free to spread the indigenous seed, create fire breaks with their tracks, keep the grasses down to prevent fires.

Governments throughout the world must be educated to understand the ways of the wild horse and their benefit to our environment. Killing horses en masse must never be allowed to happen again.

Elizabeth Lovegrove

Wild Horses Kimberley

Wildhorseskimberley13@gmail.com

THE JESUIT ABBOTT’S FEAR OF KATTER RETURNS TO HIS HANSON LIES & DECEIT

Abbott Fears Katter Control

Tony Abbott, founder of the slush fund to sink Pauline Hanson and the One Nation political party, emphatically denied any association with theattacks on Hanson until his lies were exposed on national television Abbott will not be paying a red cent getting free his high flying blue ribbon legal team to fight a $1.5 million lawsuit by One Nation co-founder David Ettridge.

Mr Abbott confirmed in a declaration to parliament that his lead counsel will be silk Mr R.G Bain QC assisted by Mr N Ferrett. Both are acting pro-bono with instruction from Brisbane based McCullogh Robertson lawyers. David Ettridge is fighting without a blue ribbon freebie legal team.

Remember “you are not guilty until the money runs out”

Ms Hanson and party co-founder David Ettridge were both found guilty of fraud by a jury in the Brisbane District Court on August 21, 2003 and were each sentenced to three years jail as a result of direct action from now opposition leader Tony Abbott with his silent slush fund partners.

Headlining – Abbott ‘active’ against Hanson– The Australian August 26, 2003 by Dennis Shanahan, we find this statement from Mr Tony Abbott;

“She risked destroying what I thought was the best conservative government since Bob Menzies – that’s to say the Howard Government – so I certainly did take a very, very active anti-One Nation role.”

The two party system and the Liberal preservation of their elite electoral system, is now showing major cracks and in damage control as Bob Katter gains momentum similar to Pauline Hanson’s campaign not seen since federation while threatening to open the well guarded government financial accounts to the voting people of Australia? She needed to be removed, and at any cost that included forming an allegiance between Liberal and Labor parties to remove One Nation as a threat to their two party system controlling Australian politics.

Bob Katter victory sign

Bob Katter Smells Victory

Liberals advertising big time across Queensland quotes “ A Vote for Katter is a Vote for Labor” confirms Katter has them more than worried as he enjoys an explosion in his support base of disillusioned two party voters sick of the corruption and dictatorship government.

KAP Federal President, Member for Mount Isa Rob Katter said, “It’s the sort of dirty politics which contributes to a record one-in-four Australians refusing to be forced to choose between the ALP/LNP duocracy that believes it’s born to rule”.

“Of course we all know the major parties have done their own preference deals with each other – such as the LNP preferencing Labor – because it’s in their best interests for Australia to be ruled by the duocracy. However history has shown that our outdated two-party system of government has proved in the worst interests of Australia and its people,”said Mr Katter.

KAP Qld Leader and Member for Condamine, Ray Hopper said the KAP had negotiated preference agreements with a clear focus: “To put our candidates in the best position to win seats in Parliament so we can be the people’s watchdog of our corporate-controlled major party governments – and get rid of the Greens puppeteers holding our country to ransom”.

But the major parties did not deserve anything from the KAP, said Mr Hopper – and the preference agreements were designed to do exactly that; to give them nothing but rather take seats away from them.

“The major parties are just different dogs with the same fleas – or different bananas in the same skin, as the case may be,” said Mr Hopper. “So we are effectively giving neither anything – because we are in fact poised to take seats from the ALP and LNP and become the third force in Australian politics.”

Mr Katter noted that whilst government is formed on the floor of the House of Representatives, the KAP’s strong showing in the 2010 Qld election effectively handed the LNP about a dozen seats because the KAP cannibalised the ALP vote.

“So it’s crucial that Australians do not hand complete control of both the House and the Senate to any major party to rubber stamp any decision they like – nor keep the Greens calling the tune. As such, the KAP negotiated preferences that put our candidates in pole position to be the people’s voice in Parliament against the ALP-LNP ‘corporation’ that’s destroyed industry and opportunity in Australia and taken voters for granted.”

Our colluding two party system claiming democracy in Australia as we the people are forced to endure inefficient government, corrupt government, dictatorial government without means of terminating this violation under our present constitution until the elected period has expired. A true democratic voice would call to account, politicians and government destroying our nation under political license.

Established as a liar, a person without trust, will Tony Abbott change the constitution to allow the people a voice to decide any government’s future to govern outside the elected term?

The same question is directed to Malcolm Turnbull with PM aspirations, sitting in the wings with wife Lucy poised for the carbon trading orders if he leads the Liberal Party, unless he gets a better offer from Labor as he moves to establish the republic flag yet again.

Trust Me, You’re Not Weird

Reality TV show, Big Brother, recently returned to the small screen.

This time — after a four-year break — it appears on Channel Nine rather than Channel Ten.

I’m sure you’re familiar with the format, so I’ll explain it in brief…just in case you’ve been lucky enough to avoid this televisual abomination.

Earlier this year, more than 10,000 Australians applied to be a contestant on the show.

Most likely the application process involved writing a wacky letter and filming an even wackier video…to show the producers just how the applicant is outgoing, hopefully controversial, but most of all, conforming.

At the end of the process, the producers picked the winning applicants, who get to star on prime-time TV.

The reward? To be locked up with a bunch of other wacky funsters for an unspecified period of time. To wake up and go to bed when they’re told…to eat food what and when they’re told…and to do anything else demand by ‘Big Brother’.

Of course, it’s easy to say that Big Brother is just harmless fun. But it’s more than that. It also highlights a disturbing and growing trait among some people…

The desire to control and the willingness to be controlled.

Both are equally dangerous, because those who enjoy being controlled hate those who prefer individualism and freedom.

They hate choice. And because they submit to the controllers, they believe everyone else should submit too.

To them it’s only fair.

But the Big Brother applicants aren’t the only ones who enjoy oppression. But at least for them it’s voluntary. That’s not always the way in the real world…

It’s Not Weird to Want Freedom

Control and oppression is the whole game plan of statists and central planners. Their aim is to take power and money from your hands and put it in the hands of a godlike leader.

And if you speak out against it, they’ll say you’re weird. But what’s weird about not wanting the government to tell you what to do?

What’s weird about not wanting to live like a battery hen in government-approved housing? Or not wanting the government telling you what to eat, when to eat, and what healthcare you should have.

And perhaps most of all, there’s nothing weird about not wanting to join a group that punishes success and rewards failure.

Those things aren’t weird. It’s just striving for natural human rights…the right to self-determination.

But while freedom is a natural right for each person, it’s also the enemy of central planners and maniacal leaders.

Why? Well, unless these people deny you liberty, the godlike leader doesn’t have any power.

Someone can only have power over you if they deny you the same power. That’s how all hierarchies work.

Sacrificing Jobs for Power

Take the trade union movement. Unionists love controlling others. But those who join trades unions aren’t always voluntary members.

Try working on a building site without a union ticket…or most other blue-collar jobs. If you don’t want to join a union, then get ready for violence, vitriol, or even unemployment.

You’re either with them or you’re against them. Think about it. Why do trade unions rarely negotiate a pay cut in order to save jobs?

The answer is simple. If everyone keeps their job but gets a pay cut, all the employees will hate the boss and the union.

But, if the union can keep wages high for some of the workers by sacrificing a few jobs, there’s a different result. Then only those who lose their job will hate the union. Those who remain will still pay their union dues and will still fight for the union because they’ve kept their job.

It’s all about having power, keeping power, and gaining more power.

The union movement’s great claim to fame — superannuation — is a great example.

The unions always claim that they’re working to protect the workers…that they care about your job and about your retirement.

But it’s not true. The truth is that super was never about looking after union members. It was never about caring for workers’ retirement. It was and still is about power.

The unions sacrificed higher wages for their members in favour of super contributions for one simple reason…

When wages go in to the workers’ pocket, the worker can save or spend it as they wish. That’s just how it should be.

But, that’s no use for an organisation that wants to control people. So the best way the union movement could get more control was to follow the lesson of government…

Unions Use ‘Muscle’ to Get Your Money

The government taxes you so it can control your money and your life. The more you have, the less you need to rely on government. The union movement simply copied this. But they couldn’t call it a tax because unions don’t have the power to tax.

So they had to come up with a different way to control your money and your life — superannuation.

The union movement conspired with the government to take money from your pocket and put it into the control of the unions. Not directly of course, but indirectly, through union-owned industry super funds.

It was an inspired policy that would help the government and unions have even more control over the economy and you.

If you don’t believe me and think I’m talking baloney, then check this out. It’s all here in an article from the Sydney Morning Herald from 28 September, 1989:

 ‘The Treasurer, Mr Keating, has urged the trade union movement to use the billions of dollars generated by superannuation over the next 20 years to increase its own industrial clout.

‘Mr Keating told [trade union] Congress delegates that the development of union-run superannuation funds would give the union movement “institutional muscle” to supplement its already substantial industrial strength.

‘He suggested that the additional clout could prove a potent weapon against conservative administrations intent on eroding the power of the union movement.

‘In a “hostile political environment”, unions could flex their institutional muscle in the financial sector instead of simply “passing motions in the trades hall”, he said.’

You see, it’s all about power.

And the only way to get power is by taking your money and using it to control you.

Your Money to Get Further Out of Reach

In the past I’ve warned that one day the government will make you ‘an offer you can’t refuse’. That is, it will say that if you give up all the assets in your super fund you’ll qualify for a brand new Super Age Pension.

That you won’t have to worry about rising and falling stock markets, or the risk of investing. Instead, the government will care for you in retirement.

And it will do it with the help of another bunch of vested interests — the financial services industry.

As the Australian Financial Review reported this week:

‘The superannuation industry, economists and actuaries have urged the federal government to increase the age at which superannuation can be accessed, to avoid a $1 trillion short-fall in retirement savings.

‘The Institute of Actuaries, CAP Australia [CPA Australia? Ed] and the Financial Services Council say the gap between the superannuation “preservation age”, now 60, and the age pension age, now 65 should be narrowed. The Grattan Institute argues both ages should be increased to 70.

‘The Financial Services Council says the collective shortfall in savings for the working population that will live beyond average life expectancy now totals some $1 trillion.

‘The vast majority of workers have not saved enough money for the 20-plus years they may now spend in retirement, leaving successive federal governments open to an extreme financial burden, Financial Services Council chief executive John Brogden said:

“Every Australian should be encouraged to the best of their ability to become a self-funded retiree and take pressure off the government,” he said. The FSC says the age at which retirees can access their super should be raised from 60 to 62, in line with the increase in the age pension eligibility age from 65 to 67 that is due to come into force in 2023. That would decrease the so-called “longevity savings gap” of $1 trillion by $400 billion, Mr Brogden argued.’

So not only does the government force your employer to take money from your wages to deposit into an untouchable account, but now vested interests are trying to make sure you can’t get your hands on it until you’re 70 years old.

But what about the idea that the ‘vast majority of workers have not saved enough money’? That may have something to do with forcing people to buy things they don’t need, such as health insurance. Or maybe it’s because the government taxes away one-third of the average worker’s income.

Bottom line: whether it’s governments, lobby groups or trade unions, they’re all trying to increase their power…at your expense.

My aim is to help you by turning the tables on the central planners to get back the power they’ve taken from you.

Cheers,
Kris

www.moneymorning.com.au