By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
THE ABC’s recent online and TV coverage of the growth of so-called sovereign citizens groups has again shown the organisation to be at their political core, a government propaganda outlet.
Back in June, when the newly-elected Tasmanian independent MP Craig Garland spoke at a Unity in Community meeting Ulverstone, a local “award winning” ABC reporter Adam Holmes launched a paranoid hit piece against him.
Holmes did his best to imply that it was somehow scandalous that a state MP attended and spoke at a political meeting attended by – shock and horror – “sovereign cititizens”.
The meeting had been arranged by prominent Launceston community activist and former councillor Shayne “Cush” Allison, and also featured as a speaker Darren Bergwerf from the Frankston My Place group in Victoria. This event also featured on ABC’s Four Corners documentary “LawFare”.
Ironically, the word “lawfare” refers to legal action taken by some rich and powerful entity with the objective of harrasssing and bankrupting its target. It does not apply to community-level legal action.
“Lawfare”, which ran during the week, featured various law activists across Australia including the Sovereign Peoples Assembly of Western Australia. The reporter Mahmood Kazal, seemed to have a listening ear, but in the wash-up it was legal establishment 1, the people 0.
The various activists were given reasonable time to put their views as were various law professors including David Heilpern, former NSW magistrate-turned Dean of Law at Southern Cross University.
Unsurprisingly, these mainstream legal practitiioners and academics were unanimous in their condemnation of the various arguments raised in courts by so-called sovereign citizens or freemen. The simple reason is that these arguments usually do not align with legal practice and/or court procedures.
Whether or not strawman or “commerce” arguments align with existing law is debatable, but telling a court that you, as a living breathing man on the land are not operating in commerce and are therefore not subject to the state’s legislation, is simply outside the scope of the legal system as we know it. Such arguments in Australian, UK and US courts are now routinely dismissed.
A more practical approach is to work within existing law as done by groups like Aussie Speeding Fines and KnowYourRightsGroup.com.au. We are also aware of people who use the private commercial notice system promoted by various gurus, although we are yet to see hard evidence of a government body directly responding to them.
Some of the greatest legal battles by freedom-loving Aussies have been fought in the courts using existing law. Darryl O’Bryan, the founder of the Melbourne group Community Law Resource Group, has much to say on that, as do former Senators Rod Culleton and Len Harris.
As for WA’s Sovereign Peoples Assembly (SPA), they were likened to a cult by one of the establishment observers featured by Four Corners. It’s difficult to see how their approach of running their own common law courts will ever be accepted by mainstream society and courts established under existing state and federal Constitutions.
SPA and others maintain, of course, that the system is inherently corrupted and broken, therefore they have no option to take the course they do. This is debatable, a debate that Cairns News is willing to air and make public.
However, the fact that SPA is doing what it does in running common law peoples’ courts, indicates the frustration many have with a system that frequently reveals corrupt and dictatorial tendencies and is distant from the people it is supposed to serve. SPA might be better off pushing for Citizens’ Initiated Referenda to be legislated into WA law.
We should note that the legal establishment itself is aware of encroachments by governments on traditional rights and freedoms and has produced a substantial report on that very issue called Traditional Rights and Freedoms—Encroachments by Commonwealth Laws (ALRC Report 129). It should have been extended to state governments.
Four Corners seems to infer that the court system in Australia is somehow above reproach. This is the same court system that on several occasions, somehow justified the draconian and unlawful actions of the NSW government in riding roughshod over historic rights and freedoms during Covid.
Among other outrages such as lockdowns and travel restrictions, the State Government of NSW (and other states) forced employees to take Covid- 19 injections or face dismissal from their jobs. As noted on the Law Reform Commission’s own website, people have a historic right at common law to informed consent for medical treatment, but this was simply cast aside by so-called government “orders”.
The judges were informed of these grievous breaches of historic civil and individual rights but that went over their heads. Essentially, their rulings were based on the spurious “supremacy of parliament” doctrine that infers if legislation says the government can impose a dictatorship, then it can.
And while this court system allowed Queensland doctor William Bay to regain his registration after being suspended by the dictatorial Australian Health Practitioners Agency (AHPRA), the courts in VIctoria upheld the same agency’s destruction of other Victorian doctors for merely giving advice and exemptions from government Covid dictates.
The ABC showed video footage of various people challenging cops during Covid enforcement operations. Some of it sounded a little hysterical and over the top, but there was no mention of an actual government-endorsed police state violating everyday rights and freedoms. Four Corners implied that it’s somehow outrageous and scandalous for people to resist police-state powers.
At a basic level the ABC missed the mark. In the words of Mahmood Fazal “these groups …. operate in an alternate reality where people have ultimate authority over the state”.
Neither Fazal nor his producers appear to have read the Preamble to the Commonwealth Constitution which, in accordance with the underlying principles of English law and natural law, opens, stating “WHEREAS the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania, humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, and under the Constitution hereby established:…”
The people, and their sovereign, initiated the Federation of Australia and the rules of state, just as the people, or at least one particular group of English people, initiated the Magna Carta to curb the power of a ruling king.
Even today in the grounds at Parliament House, Canberra, there is a special area set aside to note the significance and place of the Magna Carta in our system of government.
The background article on the monument notes: “The effects of the actions of the English nobles at Runnymede have rippled out across the world and over time. Magna Carta gave us these concepts:
Justice for all. Freedom. Rule of Law (meaning that the people and the government agree to be ruled by law but that this law must be such that the government and the people are able and willing to obey it) and Trial by Jury.
Cynics have suggested it’s actually a memorial for something long dead. We hope otherwise.
Howard Wright
August 21, 2025 at 1:02 pm said,
“And if you don’t mind Jase, would it be ok if borrow that title:
‘The can’t eat tea without the 6 o’clock news on crowd’?
It’s a bloody good one. 👍 🇦🇺”
Go for it Howard 🤠
“Then God said, ‘Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.’ So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.” – Genesis 1:26-27
🤔
Then duck quacked, “Let us” free-men and free-women, “in our” quest for truth and enlightenment question everything the control freaks write and utter to impress images, their thought provoking actions in our primitive scones, should we take the knee to feudal lords in high places, the ceremonious acknowledgment of our enslavement to authority, programmed to obey.
Gotta waddle.
Freek out is definitely an understatement 😂
@Caltrop
Buzz sprout “New Word Order”
Odysee “Psinergy”
The Buzz sprout Subscription will solve most of what Hosea 4:6 speaks of, once you comprehend you’ll see the commercial (Skeletor) biological
and spiritual trespass on nature through 35 USC 101.
Thesis, anti-thesis and synthesis biological GMO wet dream (of Pirates) in trapping the spirits (You.. that inhabit the biology) in patented corporate (Corpes-orate = dead speak) owned meat suits using the godly act of creation called fertilisation (As David in Prometheus/Alien Covenant was trying to achieve), anything unnatural will be subject to some type of intellectual property (like cyborg laws).
All the best.
* Phrase
Dean Winter is gone Uncle Mohamet, there goes Tasmania’s only chance of a next Prime Minister walking down the street.
I had a conversation with him a few years back, he’s smart, articulate, a good business mind, well presented, not a typical Laborite cringe as in Albo the union dog.
Good blokes don’t last long in politics, Josh Willie takes over showing the uniparty is now back on track; supporting the proposed one billion dollars new colosseum on poisoned reclaimed land, where footballers will entertain crowds of 5,000 impoverished future generations of Tasmanians.
Would it be appropriate for sovereign Australians to put up a tent city on the laws of the new Parliament House, then burn the doors down?
You know, just to distinguish themselves from the pretend SOVEREIGN CITIZENS that burnt the doors of ye olde Parliament House down; giving fat controllers the opportunity to usher in a new AUSTRALIAN order, a new era of their rule by Roman Law, to coin an oxymoron, their mercenaries intimidate using brain dead force and lame stream media the opportunity to program receptive minds with a perceived new anti social catch fraise, to disassociate citizen slaves from those dirty little commoners.
There can only be one overall authority and that is the Father of all creation –
Paul the apostle to the Romans – Romans 13:1-2
A translation of my Greek interlinear provided this –
“Every soul to authorities higher be subject to. For there is no authority if not from God, but the existing authorities under Me having been ordained (by me) are. So the one resisting the authority of his God has opposed and those having opposed to themselves judgement will receive.”
Luke 11:28 – But he said, Yea rather, blessed [are] they that hear the word of God, and keep it. Acts 5:29 – Then Peter and the [other] apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
“…….Romans 13 is in play until the government, ruling class, authority over you, whatever you want to call it, decides that it is the final arbiter and sets itself up in the position reserved for God alone. When the state or the government moves to exclude God and to erect itself in that position, a Christian has an obligation before God to expose and resist evil.
Eph 5.11 have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness but rather reprove them. even if it means that resistance has consequences from those who assume power that you are resisting…………”
Genesis 1:1 is the beginning of Scripture and the foundation for all other revelation. It all begins with the statement that God is the Creator. This establishes not only His sovereignty but His right of ownership as the Creator. He has the right to do with His creation as He pleases. No other being has the right to tell Him what to do or to revise His plan according to his will.
Those who make such claims are trying to be gods in themselves, because they usurp the Creator’s right of ownership. However, God asserts that in reality “there is none else.” In fact, there can be only one sovereign God in the universe. All others have authority, which is delegated to lesser beings, and which is to be used to further the will of the Sovereign.
Authority is never more powerful than the Sovereign Master who authorised it. Jesus said, “A slave is not greater than his master” (John 13:16).
https://godskingdom.org/blog/2020/10/isaiah-prophet-of-salvation-book-6-part-24
The Queen had been a huge failure by reneging on her coronation oath to uphold the Christian faith.
The Pirates of Finance operating from “The Crown City of London” which is not a part of Britain and which the queen needs permission to enter have now set themselves up as the highest authority with their Law of the Sea/Admiralty/Maritime law/Statute law.
1 Timothy 6:10 (NKJV) 10 For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, for which some have strayed from the faith in their greediness, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
A bit more from Tasmania
Crooked collaborator ABC-TV put on one of their academics who appears terrified of supposed 1.5 degrees Celsius but we see the motivation here
https://www.utas.edu.au/about/news-and-stories/articles/2022/women-leading-the-charge-in-research-grant-success
They want holidays in Antarctica and play with the penguins
Well, does the author ever mention that the courts are unlawful while the fake secret society judges sit under the fake seal, the Kangaroo and Emu, instead of the constitutionally mandated, never changed by referendum of the people, Lion and Unicorn?
That is TREASON!
The Sovereigns are right and the citizens are SLAVES. Sovereigns stand on the land and soil jurisdiction.
Living men/women are not commodities to be treated as corporations without inalienable rights. Police (policy enforcers) and the fake courts are enforcing LAW OF THE SEA.
States, ran by UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOREIGN OWNED CORPORATIONS make laws REPUGNANT TO THE 1901 CONSTITUTION, which makes them null and void, being invalid.
We live in a lawless land ran by criminals. They are all secret society like Freemasons.
The Sovereigns are right!
Notice the username…It means to reject acting as a corporation and take back your sovereignty. The only authority above the people is God…remember how they tell us they represent us? They certainly are making sure the education system keeps you ignorant and stupid.
We are being subjected to the law of sea (Law of the Holy See, Vatican), Admiralty Law, also known as Satan’s Law. Administrative law, even contract law…OUR ‘COURTS’ are Administrative tribunals, law of the sea, the court a ship at dry dock (on paper of course, fictionally) that ‘do the King’s business’, they are not common law courts whatsoever, which are land/soil jurisdiction, which living and women
We do not live on/under the sea, ON PAPER, fictionally, they made it happen, moved the shoreline so the continent was submerged and the people subjected to Admiralty law, also known as Pirate’s law.
We have a well known DOCUMENTED history, outside of the mainstream media/education of systematic treachery and treason from the political class, all the way to them now being the equivalent of actors reading scripts and takling orders ‘from above’.
I have a constitutionally recognized ‘Red Duster Flag’, our nations original civilian flag, the one our Diggers fought under in WW1 and WWII. Did anyone know that? The blue flag, is the government flag and used to be our maritime flag! Unconstitutionally and IGNORANTLY, people rally under the flag of their enemy, the belligerent occupiers, beLIEving it is a sacred flag, the one our Diggers fought under! No! This is a HUMILIATION RITUAL I swear it!
Let the belligerent occupiers know that you know, fly the Red Duster. I was accused of racism for displaying it…who would do that to those people, make them think it has anything to do with racism? Those that keep ‘shaking that jar’ with red ant and the black ant in it!
The Synagogue of Satan has you under Admiralty Law, fronted by the Vatican (Law of the Holy See, Satan’s Law). Slaves in Rome had their NAMES IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
Lets all burn the strawman…THE DEVIL DECIEVES THE WHOLE WORLD! Just look at the law system you live under!
LOOK HERE! You abandoned your Ceste Que Trust when you were just seven years old as ‘You are presumed dead, lost at sea, returned to port as a ship, a boat, a cargo barge as CHATTEL OF THE GOVERNMENT’.
Your courts are Ships at dry dock, the ‘Judge’ in his black robes, is the Priest (of BAAL) on the ship and THEREFORE THE JUDGE!
Hang the whole damn lot of them. Get back true freedom stay a free range tax slave.
The first step is to free your mind of the mind control. Educate yourself. the truth will set you free. The world will make more sense.
Commenter duck
They all ganged up on the ALP in Tasmania, maybe federal ALP will be thrown under the bus soon, they are desperate now, nothing left to sell after Keating and Howard sold it all off, Time for ALP Shadow President Keating to skedaddle for the French end of Swissyland
“Garbo” the fisherman.
Craig Garland a man of the people, a true to his word down to earth Aussie.
On July 21, 2025 after the Tasmanian general election Premier Jeremy Rockliff jumped the gun announcing to the world,
“While counting continues, one thing is clear.
The Liberal Party will hold the most seats, with a significantly increased
vote.”
People spoke, there was no majority, Rockliff then set about pressuring independents to support his party, as he declared before the election he would not form a minority government with The Greens.
Pressure, including unrealistic timelines for the independents to suss out the terms and conditions of his offer.
Rockliff wheeled and dealed successfully.
First sentences from Garbo’s latest address to parliament yesterday — full transcript is available on his faceplant page, with video for those challenged reading more than one tweet at a time.
“Three months ago, I stood in this place and supported the no confidence motion in the premier.
So, today, I must ask what has changed?
At this point, the budget matters panel is merely a gesture.
Most of all, I will need access to expert advice, both from Treasury and from independent experts, and I think we all will.
The Premier’s handling of Marinus Link was an unmitigated disaster.
Since that low point, we have seen several positive announcements by the government on forestry, greyhound racing and salmon farming.
In the last parliament I was frustrated by the Liberals’ refusal to engage in the urgent reform needed to protect our marine environment.
All through this process – trying to make government work, trying to work with the Labor Party, trying to get a government to go forward – I thought, ‘What can I do that is not going to cost jobs, is not going to impact anybody and will give us much needed reform?’
It wasn’t with excessive demands.
These are promises, and I’ve heard plenty of promises from this Premier before.
The marine environment act was a proposal I put to both Labor and the government as a way of strengthening the marine environment.
This act is not about shutting industries down. I care about the salmon jobs.
I’m sick of the division.
The Liberal Party – you’re in government; you’ve got the reins over the next four years.
I know I’m a fisherman, but this is all about balance and it’s all about compromise.
I look back to the 1970s, and there was so much diversity out there.
For this environment act that we are bringing forward to be effective, it must include clear guiding principles.
The community does a lot of the science for us.
We need regional advisory councils.
We need new marine protected areas.
I want action on our marine environment.
Crucially, we must have a continued moratorium on salmon expansion.
In other policy areas, there are significant differences between me and the Liberals, so I welcome the Foundations of Stability document as a sign of greater willingness to engage with the crossbench in policy development.
Nevertheless, my grave concerns about the budget remain.
Until I see genuine action to repair the budget and real delivery on these policy commitments, on these promises, I cannot have confidence in a premier who over-promises and under-delivers.
The time is for delivery.
The second part of the motion calls on me to express confidence in Dean Winter and the Labor Party to govern our state.
That is partly why in June I supported Mr Winter’s no confidence motion.
Since the election, my discussions with Mr Winter have been genuine and constructive.
Governing in minority requires more than just collaboration.
At this point, Labor has not demonstrated either the desire or the capacity to form a stable government with this crossbench.
I will finish by extending this invitation to Labor, an invitation to show more of a willingness to work with the crossbench in this parliament on areas like integrity reform.
To the people of Tasmania, I want to assure you that through this parliament I will maintain my independence and consider each matter on its merits.
I will finish by adding that I was reading the Mercury the other day and they were talking about the Northern Territory and the ACT where they’ve had majority government for a long time and then it changed.”
Are you challenged Ed?
Jase:
“notice how all the stories on all channels are the same” poor sheeple hey.”
And it’s no coincidence either that they’re often literally exact, word for word (scripted), copied stories, from the same complicit, lying MSM sources.
And if you don’t mind Jase, would it be ok if borrow that title:
‘The can’t eat tea without the 6 o’clock news on crowd’?
It’s a bloody good one. 👍 🇦🇺
Similar to but better than those worn out ones like ‘masktards, jabtards or ‘covidiots’, which all describe the same crowd of dumbed-down, spineless and gleefully obedient sheep-men we have here.
Obvious Bob, Denis and many others have nailed it…
For some insane reason Native born in Terra Australis commonly known as Australia seem to identify as “Citizens” and by definition Citizens are not native born Aussies.
The difference being that as native born to a country gives you inalienable “Rights” whereas “Citizens” are granted privileges if they behave.
Also to claim to be a “Sovereign Citizen” is an oxymoron as it is nonsense that you can be both at the same time. It is a tag that the belligerent occupying Government Goons use to discredit those that have woken up to their crimes.
They fear that according to the “Law of War” manual in Article 11.3 Belligerent occupation, if the People rebel against the occupying force and no longer submit then the game is over and that could be why “Old mate” the retired Magistrate seemed a little worried because he could be found guilty in a Military Tribunal of violating the Palermo Protocols by trading in Persons.
For clarification here, “Person” is defined in Butterworths legal dictionary as a corporation. Therefore if you see, in any Court document a name in all capitals it would be considered as a person legally speaking. Living names are spelt in upper and lower case as we learnt at school. All uppercase are seen on tomb stones (Dead, corpse) and as you would reasonably know that no further harm can come to those that identify as dead and that is the sick World that these Lawtards revel in…
What was not revealed from the original interview was the notice that he read out to Mahmood that says it all.
Link to interview: https://www.facebook.com/johnnny.Q/videos/634728509034677
In this link in my view the notice nails it however consider that a rebuttal of the notion of the profile of being a “Sovereign Citizen” by clarifying that the thumb print is proof of life that you are not probated and to remove the presumption.
Decades-long Jewish influence over PM’s, governments and the ABC
h ttps://i0.wp.com/cairnsnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Leibler-Uluru_36778-640×400-1.jpg?w=640&ssl=1
The architects of the Voice referendum, at the closing ceremony of the Indigenous Constitutional Convention in 2017, from left, Indigenous leader Noel Pearson; Mark Leibler and Pat Anderson, Referendum Council co-chairs; and Professor Megan Davis, UNSW’s pro vice-chancellor, Indigenous.
https://cairnsnews.org/2023/12/25/decades-long-jewish-influence-on-pms-governments-and-the-abc/
It’s simple, ABC know if Australian Men grow a set the ABC would be one of the first thing to go.
I’ve always said to the can’t eat tea without the 6 o’clock news on crowd, ” you know the person vomiting the so called news at you is a person you wouldn’t get along with for a beer at the pub” then I go on to say “notice how all the stories on all channels are the same” poor sheeple hey.
“THE SO CALLED ELECTIONS AND PREFERENTIAL VOTING HAVE NO BASIS IN LAW SINCE THEY DO NOT OPERATE AS AT 1901.”
Absolutely.
So, did you ‘vote’ in the invalid government’s last illegal, rigged [S]election Dennis?
Judging by what you’ve just said I guess, same as me: you didn’t. Right?
The UnaParty government is running scared now they have got so many people offside thanks to the forced injections program 2021-2023, so the choice of an Uncle Tom Fazal is no surprise, the ABC-TV is a bunch of real weasels and you can see it clearly when they run non-practicing Dr Norman Swansky and shifty croweater Buttler the silence on forced injections is deafening, every other aspect of government seems to be riddled with corruption, they are hiring public servants “the buffer” as fast as they can, lowering unemployment and guaranteeing more loans from Swissy’s RBA. This 4 corners story is part of the big band-aid the corrupt governing class are putting on us, get ready for the future, we will be sold out by government, banksters, medicos, cops and imported mercenaries.
Ronald Bernard the Dutch elite banker who refused to take part in human sacrifice dishes up the dirt (5 min)
https://www.tiktok.com/@shao9997/video/7532044518548311317?q=shao9997&t=1755737061869
More on the same channel
The birth/berth of Birth Certificates –
“Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that’s you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges.
They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.
After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call “Social Insurance.”
Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office (presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America.” ~ American traitor, the Jew Edward Mandell House giving a very detailed outline of the New World Order plans that were to be implemented gradually over time to enslave the American people … A PLAN THAT HAS BEEN REPEATED IN CANADA, AUSTRALIA, BRITAIN AND ELSEWHERE”.
Any mere Australian government that is not constructed according to original Constitutional Law, and under the principles of Magna Carta, is not the Government at all.
This corporate government, reinforced by it’s unlawfully established British Maritime Law Courts that have NO JURISDICTION ON ANY LANDMASS, are just a farce, a takeover COUP D eTAT that began it’s notable impressions into politics in the early 1900s, as soon as Queen Victoria died just 22 days after federation on 01/01/1901, and do not represent the Australian sovereign citizens who are supposed to be controlling the government and all it’s practices.
This sytem of government is not lawfully a dictatorship, as it currently acts.
It has no Monarch of Great Britain and Ireland, and therfore has no Letters Patent that give authority to install any lawmaking, and so is just a takeover by Freemasonry driven forces that are the pet dogs of the New World order.
The Pretend Parliaments are not lawfully installed parliaments of any standing and do not have lawfully presented Governors or Governor General.
The whole Corporate Government of Australia is a fraud in law, and cannot be allowed to rule and reign over the Sovereign peoples of this great land.
Admiralty Courts cannot rule over law and order of the Constitution standards, cannot uphold or pull apart anything that was in place at Federation.
Those original laws are the only ones that Citizens of Australia have to obey, and all that has been pretended since are null and void.
The Constitution ran out of authority after 99 years and now is void, we do not have an officially and lawfully installed Monarch, and so we, the people are under NO OBLIGATION TO ANY PRETEND PARTIES THAT CLAIM TO BE THE GOVERNMENT.
AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE A LAWFULLY INSTALLED GOVERNMENT !!!!!
THE SO CALLED ELECTIONS AND PREFERENTIAL VOTING HAVE NO BASIS IN LAW SINCE THEY DO NOT OPERATE AS AT 1901.
THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT AN IMMUNE SYSTEM THAT CAN EVOLVE WITHOUT REFERENDUM APPROVALS.
[…] READ MORE AT CAIRNS NEWS […]
The original HIgh Court Judgment on Land Claims, stated empahatically that soveriegnty resides with the crown.
For the other two posters here: GovCorp and thier policies inescapably coe with the attendant liability for harm, loss and injury perpetrated via that policy.
Only corporations have policies, lawful governments have Constitutional contractual obligations, because the Constitution is the contract between the people and the government.
An example of breach of contract over an issue that affects the whole country:
https://rumble.com/v2yf678-homelessness-equals-governmental-breach-of-contract.html
And that breach is the actual fact of the matter, and if you can see that, then you will see the breach in every service government is obligated to provide.
After all, that is what our taxes are for, is it not?
“Essentially, their rulings were based on the spurious “supremacy of parliament” doctrine” – Yep, the ‘Sovereign Parliament’ theory is pure bullshit. Perhaps the next time one of these litigants shows up in court they could tender a copy of this article and ask the court to explain why or when did Parliament become the all powerful sovereign.
https://gumshoenews.com/review-of-australian-law-and-its-decline/
IN THIS SO-CALLED “REALITY” THE STATE IS DESPICABLE. GROTESQUE.
A CARICATURE AND INVERSION OF GENUINE AUTHORITY.
The highest form of Duplicity, Narcissism, Psychopathy, and Organized Crime.
A Malignant Tumor.
The JEW WORLD ORDER.
GoveCorp panic stations !
Winning 🫡🌞🍿
The fact is that the ABC was in breach of its Charter, which says that the ABC must report accurately and impartially, something it did not do in either of the hit pieces on Darren Bergwerf or the Sovereigns.
I told Darren B, at the time, that he should have Noticed the ABC that they were in breach of their Charter and that he should demand a retraction and an apology, but he did not do that.
The Sovereigns are a bit half baked, as they have some things right and some things wrong, but an explanation would take too much space here.
That lady that said that “we are all sovereign citizens” is just asking for trouble if she tries that in the Courts, and will not succeed, though her heart is in the right place-but we are all born as free and sovereign, that sovereignty being stolen by registrations and Birth Certificates, and suchlike.
The Courts and LEGAL system are a privately owned jurisdiction which is owned by the Rothschilds, so don’t expect an even break in those courts.
And the only way any of these Courts can achieve jurisdiction is via CONTRACT, which can be achieved by something as simple as giving your name, or sitting down when the Magistrate asks you to.
And the Courts are all about equity-goods, chattels, money-and how much of it they can get off you, and the Judges and Magistrates have to be Bonded, which means that they must have indemnity insurance, because the Courts are a commercial operation.
An example of the duplicity of the Courts (they’re the same system all over the world) is in this article, in which you are looking for what Anna says about the SURNAME. Interesting stuff:
http://annavonreitz.com/twocrimesusedmostoften.pdf
And you might al want to know that when you hire a lawyer you are declaring yourself incompetent, because you are: you are not a trained lawyer, are not a Member of the BAR Association, and are thus not competent to operate in their private system.
[…] Source link […]