The Rudd Government allowed 120,000 refugees of unknown origin to enter Australia by air
from The Horn News
Just before he was fired, FBI Director James Comey dropped a truth bomb on the floor of the U.S. Senate: President Donald Trump was right.
Our broken refugee policy is killing us.
Accepting refugees from the Middle East has let hundreds of would-be terrorists enter the United States, he told the Senate last Wednesday.
Comey testified that the FBI was investigating at least 2,000 terrorists nationwide – and about 15 percent of them got into the United States by posing as “refugees.”
“You take that 2,000-plus cases, about 300 of them are people who came to the United States as refugees,” he told North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis.
One Muslim terrorist killed 49 people in Orlando. Two pulled off the shootings in San Bernardino. And 18 managed to kill about 3,000 people on 9/11. Who knows how much damage 300 could do?
Comey said the terrorists are everywhere – no corner of America is safe. The terror investigations include all 50 states, including small communities.
Immigration officials were amazed in 2011, when they found two al-Qaeda terrorists living in the U.S. after posing as “refugees.” The Muslim terrorists – who had killed American soldiers in Iraq – had settled in Bowling Green, Kentucky. One of them was living in government housing on the taxpayers’ dime. The FBI recorded them planning a “huge” attack in the U.S.
As bad as that is, the problem’s actually worse –- much worse. The refugee terrorist problem is even bigger than the numbers let on. The 2,000 FBI investigations include everybody suspected of terrorism, from the Ku Klux Klan to Barack Obama’s old buddies in the Weather Underground.
A lot of those terrorists are Americans. That means refugees make up an even bigger percentage of immigrant terrorists than the government wants to let on.
That wasn’t even the most shocking part of Comey’s testimony. He said that if Donald Trump’s travel ban had been in effect, it would have kept all of these potential terrorists from ever setting foot in the United States.
Comey testified that every single one of those 300 refugees came from the seven Muslim nations Trump wanted to place under a temporary immigration ban: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.
But instead, left-wing judges have struck down both his executive orders. Now, the floodgates are open.
The United States has admitted more than 5,500 refugees from these seven Muslim countries since Donald Trump has been president – more than 50 a day. How many of these will end up under investigation for terror?
The Hate Trump crowd doesn’t care. It considers spiting Trump more important than protecting their own country. And they seem to live in an alternate reality when it comes to terrorism.
Senator Chuck Schumer said Trump’s executive order “makes us less safe, not more. It is mean-spirited, and un-American.” 800 diplomats signed a cable to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson in February saying a refugee ban would make America less safe.
Not to be outdone, the United Nations issued a report saying that tough immigration measures “may in fact be damaging to state security.”
That would be news to countries that have admitted refugees in massive numbers, like most of Europe. ISIS used the refugee crisis to infiltrate the continent and kill the infidel.
Last summer, there were three separate attacks by refugees inside Germany within a week – two of them on the same day.
ISIS managed to get its murderers into Paris by posing as refugees. The November 2015 Paris attacks left 130 people dead.
And not all the terrorists were refugees – some of them just used the refugee chaos to help cover their tracks. One of the people who planned the Brussels bombing last March was a Swedish-born Muslim of Syrian heritage. Swedish police knew he was a radical. But he eluded them by slipping into Greece and re-entering Europe as a “refugee.”
The Brussels bombing killed 32 people.
Trump’s executive order would have kept at least 300 potential terrorists out of the country – but experts say it’s not really enough to keep us safe. We need a much tougher policy.
“Better, tougher, more thorough vetting isn’t likely to make any difference since refugees really are pretty thoroughly vetted,” wrote immigration reformer Mark Krikorian wrote in National Review. “The problem is that vetting people from failed or enemy states is impossible.”
Donald Trump would have bought a little time to figure out how to deal with that problem. But the “resistance” shot even that down.
If one of these murderers pulls off their terrorist intentions, the PC liberals will have the blood of Americans on their hands.
Trump – and Comey – tried to warn them.
Self defence is a RIGHT, not a privilege!
Published at www.sosnews.org February 2015
To keep your mind on the assimilation of our misunderstood Islamic cousins, here is a reminder to their appreciation of our Navy personnel saving their lives under the Labor government open house policy.
Their true intentions soon came to surface.
A group of Muslims attempting to invade Australia illegally by boat but turned back by the Australian navy and were sent away in their crappy boat and were filmed yelling “fuck Australia, remember 9/11.”
This is the attitude of all these Muslims coming into Western nations. They all hate us and they would all just as soon kill our Men and rape our women.
How could these 34 people from Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh— mostly Muslim countries that are neither war-torn nor famine-struck — think that threatening to kill Australian sailors, shouting “f—- Australia” and warning of another September 11 would make the country unlock their hearts and their door?
Moral of the story: ban all Muslim immigration permanently. Deport whoever has entered already.
Editorial: The moral never happened, the problem remains, the dinosaurs still hold government swinging on those shirttails of the party faithful who ride the slide to the irretrievable position the Islamic puppet masters created for the control of Australia.
Prime MinisterTurnbull’s flawed knowledge of Islam from Q & A SEPTEMBER 16, 2015
To refresh your minds, we have re-published this post from last December.
from Gil May
Islam is an ancient religion of great scholarship
Islam is not an ancient (belonging to the very distant past) religion it is a recent invention 1400 year ago.
For heavens sake, Much of Our learning and culture came to us from the Moslems our whole system of numbers
The most commonly used system of numerals is the Hindu-Arabic numeral system.
Two Indian Mathematicians are credited with developing it.
The numeral system and zero concept developed by the Hindus in India, slowly spread to other surrounding countries due to their commercial and military activities with India, Arabs adopted and modified it, they did not invent it.
“I will omit all discussion of the science of the Indians, … , of their subtle discoveries in astronomy, discoveries that are more ingenious than those of the Greeks and the Babylonians, and of their valuable methods of calculation which surpass description. I wish only to say that this computation is done by means of nine signs. If those who believe, because they speak Greek, that they have arrived at the limits of science, would read the Indian texts, they would be convinced, even if a little late in the day, that there are others who know something of value.”[
According to al-Qifti’s chronology of the scholars
“… a person from India presented himself before the Caliph al-Mansur in the year [776 AD] who was well versed in the siddhanta method of calculation related to the movement of the heavenly bodies, and having ways of calculating equations based on the half-chord [essentially the sine] calculated in half-degrees … This is all contained in a work … from which he claimed to have taken the half-chord calculated for one minute. Al-Mansur ordered this book to be translated into Arabic, and a work to be written, based on the translation, to give the a solid base for calculating the movements of the planets …”
Much of the learning of the ancient Greeks only survived because of the Arab scholars. Islam is a great tradition.
During the Islamic wars where they swallowed surrounding cultures, the pre-existing sciences, philosophies and learnings were absorbed into Islamic culture and eventually translated into Arabic. The massive Christian contribution in translating the sciences were later identified as Arab Islam, when in reality the greater percentage of real science was developed from the prior teachings of Greek, Indic, Assyrian, and Persian knowledge.
It is important for us that we promote and encourage Islam traditions that are moderate, that support freedom support democracy and support Australian Values.
There are NO moderate Islamic traditions—they are all fanatical: read the Koran and see.
The Global Islamic population is approximately 1,200,000,000, that is ONE BILLION TWO HUNDRED MILLION
or 20% of the world’s population.
They have received on 7 Nobel Prizes: – 1. Literature: 4 Peace (resolving problems they created) 2. Medicine – from western education.
The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000; that is FOURTEEN MILLION or about 0.02% of the world’s population.
They have received 129 Nobel Prizes.
Australia with a small population has received 15 Nobel Prizes.
Islam has made no major contribution to the world other than terrorism and barbaric acts where their Shari law prohibits women from education, respect and decency—the opposite of modern decent living. Where women are killed at random, tortured, raped, amputated and stoned to death. ISIS has shown the underlying fundamental basis of Islam with their horrific acts against young girls of different belief, rapes, torture, cutting their throats and catching the blood to throw over the next victims to further terrorise them; men torn apart, genital ripped off, burnt, crucified, others hung with hooks to die.
The reason: The Muslim religious/political/ideology brainwashing does not allow free thinking, supressing innovation and ideas. Add to that the dogma of marrying first cousins.
Due to religious direction of marrying cousins for 1,400 years the end result is devastating inbreeding, infant deaths, deformities and low IQ. The end result as determined by several overseas courts and recently the London Coroner’s Court ruling shockingly deformed babies that died were the result of serious inbreeding genetic defects and had no hope of survival and not discrimination and neglect by white doctors/hospitals as claimed. The ongoing problems of inbreeding also create intelligence rationale difficulties used by their leaders to incite them into shocking acts.
US and UK defence experts all tell the same story of the extreme difficulty in training Moslems because of low IQ from inbreeding (generations of cousins marrying cousins marrying cousins) they found that most pilot trainees had very limited night vision, even on the brightest of moon-lit nights. Their training retention rate was minimal, including maintenance personnel. Some had dim memories and had to be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before. The western instructor gets burned-out quickly due to the futility. It actually took Moslem pilots years before they could fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a city. Ask any Marine, airman or Army personnel who’s been trying to train Iraqis and especially Afghans. European governments tell the same story these migrants unable to learn a new language, hold employment or meet entrance qualifications for the military. This was indelibly displayed for all the world to see during the current ISIS attacks in Iraq where government force who outnumbering ISIS ran away because of inbreeding mental difficulties they could not rationalise the situation and what to do—all their training could not be remembered or applied. As senior US generals said on TV “They have no fight in them and little ability”. Thus to overcome this problem it is critical for ISIS to recruit foreign fighters who have not been inbred and can rationalise and think.
Editor: The Q & A program aired every Monday night at 9.30 has long been accused of being hosted by Marxists with hand-picked Bolsheviks in the audience. After serious public criticism of the show for allowing a terrorist to appear on air, the ABC tried to ‘cover its arse’ by asking another prominent socialist and anti-firearms campaigner Ray Martin to investigate the claims. What do you know, Mr Martin says the show is unbiased and “straight up the middle”. We believe he was serious with this deduction, but few mainstream viewers took any notice of his learned opinion, as derisive comments on the ABC pages and letters to the editor will attest.
SAN BERNARDINO, Calf. (INTELLIHUB) — A few interesting details have surfaced regarding Wednesday’s mass shooting dubbed ‘terror attack’ which killed 14 and injured 17 others. One of the most interesting comes from an eyewitness.
We now know that ATF investigators recovered police issued firearms from the alleged shooters. This key detail was leaked by 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate Carly Fiorina during a press interview after she had overheard a newsroom report that doesn’t fit the official narrative.
We also know that active shooter drills actually took place near the crime scene just days before and possibly even on the same day of the mass shooting as reported by Mac Slavo.
Additionally details from an eyewitness, who came forth on the day of the shooting, may have been overlooked by investigators and suggest that there were actually ‘three white shooters’ instead of the radicalized husband and wife natural-born killer team portrayed in some mainline reports.
The witness, Sally Abdelmageed, worked at Inland Medical Center where the attack took place and saw it all unfold firsthand. It’s also important to note that Abdelmageed is likely not lying and that this quite possibly might be the most accurate eyewitness account publicized to date. After all how can two shooters, a man and a petite woman, be mistaken for three white military men with athletic builds?
In a phone interview with CBS Abdelmageed explained:
“I heard shots fired and it was from you know an automatic weapon. […] very unusual. Why would we hear shots? As we looked out the window a second set of shots goes off […] and we saw a man fall to the floor. Then we just looked and we saw three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on they were holding assault rifles. As soon as they opened up the doors to building three […] one of them […] started to shoot into the room.”
When asked what the gunman that shot into the room looked like the eyewitness replied:
“I couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on […] black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side […] long sleeve shirt […] gloves […huge assault riffle […] six magazines […] I just saw three dressed exactly the same”.
“You are certain you saw three men,” the newscaster asked Abdelmageed.
“Yes,” said Abdelmageed.
“It looked like their skin color was white. They look like they were athletic build and they appeared to be tall.”
In a shill-like manner the CBS reporter responded, “And of course we just learned that one suspect was a woman.”
To boot it also appears as if the suspects legal team believes their clients may have been made out by authorities and/or the media to be patsies further allowing for gun control narratives to be pushed onto the public. The suspects legal team also questions the validity of the Sandy Hook shooting which some believe never took place and may have been a live active shooter drill, using crisis actors, perpetuated by the establishment media as a ‘mass shooting’ as covered heavily by Intellihub in the past.
“President Barack Obama will make a rare primetime address to the nation Sunday laying out how he will keep Americans safe and defeat the Islamic State group, days after 14 people were shot dead in California,” AFP reports.
May I now ask the question: what the hell is going on here?
The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
The underwear Bomber was a Muslim
The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims
Think of it:
Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Baha’is = No Problem
Baha’is living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
Hindus living with Baha’is = No Problem
Baha’is living with Christians = No Problem
Christians living with Jews = No Problem
Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem
Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
Muslims living with Christians = Problem
Muslims living with Jews = Problem
Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
Muslims living with Baha’is = Problem
Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG PROBLEM
**********SO THIS LED TO *****************
They’re not happy in Gaza
They’re not happy in Egypt
They’re not happy in Libya
They’re not happy in Morocco
They’re not happy in Iran
They’re not happy in Iraq
They’re not happy in Yemen
They’re not happy in Afghanistan
They’re not happy in Pakistan
They’re not happy in Syria
They’re not happy in Lebanon
They’re not happy in Nigeria
They’re not happy in Kenya
They’re not happy in Sudan
******** So, where are they happy? **********
They’re happy in Australia
They’re happy in England
They’re happy in Belgium
They’re happy in France
They’re happy in Italy
They’re happy in Germany
They’re happy in Sweden
They’re happy in the USA & Canada
They’re happy in Norway & India
They’re happy in almost every country that is not Islamic! And who do they blame? Not Islam… Not their leadership… Not themselves… THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!! And they want to change the countries they’re happy in, to be like the countries they came from where they were unhappy and finally they will be get hammered!!!!
- Islamic Jihad: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- ISIS: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Al-Qaeda: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Taliban: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Hamas: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Hezbollah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Boko Haram: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Al-Nusra: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Abu Sayyaf: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Al-Badr: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Muslim Brotherhood: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Lashkar-e-Taiba: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Palestine Liberation Front: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Ansaru: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Jemaah Islamiyah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
- Abdullah Azzam Brigades: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
AND A LOT MORE!
IF YOUR GOAL was the eventual overthrow of the government and establishing Shari’a Law as the law of the land, but you didn’t have a large enough majority to do it by voting or by force, how could you do it? One good way would be to keep pressing for small, incremental concessions. And when you gain one, to hold it, and try to gain another. And if you were using this strategy, what is the first concession you’d try to gain? I think it would be to establish laws and cultural norms that prohibit criticism of your group or its goals in speech or writing.
This could effectively prevent an organized effort to block the next concessions you try to gain. I believe that is exactly what Muslims are trying to do. Here are a few recent examples:
1. Giving in to political pressure by Muslims and their supporters, a National Counterterrorism Center memorandum prohibited the use of terms such as “Jihad,” “Islamist,” and “mujahedeen.”
2. The United Nations General Assembly is considering a resolution sponsored by the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference in an attempt to â€œmainstreamâ€ prohibitions on any speech that could be considered critical of Islam.
3. Told by Muslims it could incite acts of violence, Random House decided not to publish a book on Mohammad â€” after it had already bought the rights. All three are Muslim attempts to accomplish the same goal: To hamper a non-Muslim’s ability to criticize Islam publicly. Every totalitarian state that ever ruled a nation has done the same thing, and did it first. If you can’t criticize something in public, you are left with your private thoughts and your few intimate friends. Are you the only ones who think this way? You don’t know. Silencing criticism isolates the dissenters. And it prevents important public discussions from taking place. Silencing criticism makes it possible for other concessions to be gained without effective opposition.
Earnest Muslims are using every method they can think of to shut down criticism and free speech. They legally lobby politicians and media outlets, pressuring them to silence or fire someone who criticized Islam. They slander anyone who criticizes Islam by calling them ” Islamophobic” or ” racist.” They bring lawsuits against people even if they know they will not win because the bad press is damaging enough. And they riot in the streets. After a Dutch newspaper published a cartoon depicting Mohammad, Muslims rioted all over Europe, leaving 187 people dead and making publishers think twice about publishing something critical to Islam again. And this aggressive religion will keep pushing unless we stop it.
A sufficient number of them will not try to be fair, will not try to “assimilate” into the European or American culture, and will never let up on the pressure to take over. It is their religious duty. The way to stop its spread without being cruel or violent is to establish the policy: No more concessions to Islam. I once had a job working for a seminar company. My job was to call people who had taken an introductory seminar and convince them to take the main seminar we were selling. I was given a stack of cards participants had filled out at the introductory seminar and I was told how to handle the calls: “If they give you a definite ‘no,’ throw the card away. Otherwise put it here and we’ll call them again later.” And we would keep calling these people, harassing them for years because those people were too nice to simply say, “I am not interested.” People would say, “I don’t know, let me think about it.” They would say all kinds of things other than “no.” I could hear in their voices that most of them really wanted to say no, but they wouldn’t. I felt sorry for these people, and yet I couldn’t help but think they were stupid. Why not be firm? Why not be honest? It would save them a lot of stress. If only they knew my instructions, they would have said no firmly right up front.
But the thing is, most of us are used to dealing with people who will not exploit our “niceness.” We deal with fair, considerate people almost all the time, and our ways of dealing with fair people work very well. I’m assuming you are a fair person. What do you do? If someone gave you a “socially acceptable” excuse like “I’ll think about it,” you would let them bow out, wouldn’t you? You wouldn’t ignore their signals and keep pushing. But here’s what we all have to learn sooner or later: For people who ignore your signals and keep pushing, you had better develop a different approach â€” an approach with more firmness and strength, an approach that protects yourself and defends your interests. The same goes for dealing with aggressive vacuum-cleaner salesmen. Have they ever come to your door? If you show the slightest interest, you’ll be stuck talking to them until you say yes. They are relentless, and to deal with it, you had better be firm. If you say, “I’m busy right now,” they will say, “That’s okay, when would be a good time to come back?” Islam operates much the same, except on a much larger scale with a political agenda.
Islam is pressing for concessions constantly, trying to find the weaknesses, trying to find the cracks, the loopholes, and it will keep pushing until it accomplishes its goal: A world in which every country is ruled by Shari’a law. This is not one of those problems that will go away by itself. It is up to us to be firm. They are not going to stop on their own. They must be stopped by us.
Geert Wilders is a Member of the Dutch Parliament
In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: “Who lost Europe ?” Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons in New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem.
Dear friends, Thank you very much for inviting me.
I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.
First, I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem .
The Europe you know is changing.
You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.
All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim , and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe.. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city.
There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.
Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam , Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.
In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.