Has Martin Bryant escaped from Risdon Prison to train a 64 year old retired accountant in firearms handling?
Cairns News has been examining the internet fallout since the Las Vegas ‘shootings’ that were thrust upon us by a tightly controlled major media campaign that has amounted to nothing more than brainwashing and anti-gun propaganda.
These are some of the stand-out anomalies we have discovered in the bogus news reports and police interviews.
- There were at least two shooters
- Two nearby hotel lobbies were shot up but not reported
- The alleged shooter had no motive
- In a similar style to Australia’s Port Arthur drill, firearms were inserted into the crime scene after the event
- At least 1500 to 2000 rounds would have to be fired at the distance of 400 yards for the high kill and wounded rate
- There were approximately 20 empty shells seen in photographs or television footage. Where are the remaining 1500?
- The rate of fire was examined at length by acoustics and military experts who insist a belt fed machine gun was used. A modern belt fed machine gun is almost impossible to acquire by any means even in the US
- Automatic firearms with a large rate of fire often jam, produce large volumes of gas and nitro-cellulose powder smoke, are extremely noisy in confined spaces and take a lot of effort to fire continuously, particularly for an unfit 64 year old. Did he wear earmuffs or plugs?
- The thousands of feet of posted mobile phone footage taken at the concert before and after the shooting started, clearly show there was no acute panic, no projectiles were seen to be hitting the ground, almost no ricochets were heard in the audio recordings
- Intercepted police radio recordings reveal the shooting was an exercise
- Right on cue Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull on the day of the alleged shooting, called for harsher gun laws, the establishment of a national facial recognition data bank using drivers licence photographs and other tough citizen surveillance measures, one being to hold terrorism suspects in jail for two weeks without charges
This article by investigative author Keith Noble is by far the most up-to-date research ever done about the Port Arthur shooting massacre. It is now entirely evident this massacre was not carried out by an intellectually disabled 28 year old Martin Bryant in 1996. The shooting on the 28th April, 20 years ago was so obviously carried out perpetrators with the knowledge and assistance of various persons in the government of the day. There were at least two shooters with advanced firearms knowledge and the entire operation was meticulously planned. A totally compliant Murdoch and Fairfax media asked no pertinent questions and reported the incident as instructed by the special operations department. This reporter once was a war correspondent and the reporting of disinformation about the Port Arthur events as they unfurled reeked of a military media exercise.
The real shooters have been named in previous segments by this author yet the government remains tight lipped in the hope it will go away. Some investigators claim this fateful event started as a training exercise but turned into something much more sinister.
Keith Noble maintains Bryant has been moved into the open section of Risdon Prison in Tasmania as a precursor to his murder.
Cairnsnews has published several reports about similar ‘massacres’ in the United States that subsequent research revealed were exercises that included paid actors, planned by government . The evidence is overwhelming. The Sandy Hook school shootings have been extremely well researched and any school kid would soon discover this was well named as the Sandy Hoax massacre. It simply did not happen and was a training exercise again with paid actors. Read the evidence and demand your federal member of parliament initiate an inquest into the Port Arthur training exercise.
Click on the link above to view this compelling video
Cairnsnews has been researching the Port Arthur massacre since it happened. The research team has come to the conclusion that without any doubt whatsoever Martin Bryant shot nobody on this day 20 years ago. Therefore who did the shooting and more importantly who was behind it?
All fingers point towards a false flag event orchestrated by government. Why would our government do such a thing to our people? Who assisted the government in carrying out this country’s worst ever terrorist attack?
A former Queensland resident and author now based in Austria, Keith Noble, has amassed an amazing and thoroughly researched Ebook (download or read below) which we will publish in conjunction with our video entitled Port Arthur Anniversary Uncovered.
These presentations are probably the most comprehensive, independent investigations of the Port Arthur incident yet published. If what happened at Port Arthur on the 27th and 28th of April 1996 is of concern to you and you want the first official inquiry into this massacre to occur, we suggest you contact you local federal member of Parliament and demand an independent inquiry be held by a panel of three overseas-based justices. This investigation should have the authority of a Royal Commission.
Go to this incredible interview with Keith Noble: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5vplwjX-Zo
Click Keith Noble’s Ebook to read or download
MARTIN BRYANT IS INNOCENT!
WRONGFULLY CONVICTED & INCARCERATED
20 YEARS; 1996-2016; HOBART, TASMANIA
Deception & Lies Presented to Australians
6 MAR 2016 CHANNEL 7 SUNDAY NIGHT
PORT ARTHUR, 20 YEARS
AUSTRALIANS will again be told lies about Port Arthur in Tasmania by
Channel 7 this Sunday 6th. Saying the shooting incident that took
place there in April 1996 is “Australia’s worst massacre” is absolute hype.
Many massacres in Australia have resulted in more people being killed.
The truth about the official killing at Port Arthur has been covered up
by complicit officials who have denied truth and justice to all the families,
relatives, and friends of the victims. It is the corrupt official narrative that
Channel 7 will broadcast again. Mainstream media deception continues.
WHAT CHANNEL 7 WILL NOT TELL AUSTRALIANS
_ In the supreme court on 22 APR 1994, two years before the Port Arthur
incident, Martin Bryant was placed under a guardianship order – he could
NOT manage his life. He was represented by Griffits & Jackson lawyers;
Martin Bryant is mentally handicapped. His IQ was/is(?) 66 (lowest 2%
of pop.) At best, he is an 11-year-old boy. He could NOT have premeditated,
planned, and perpetrated the incident over seven crime scenes;
_ Carleen Bryant relates the behaviour of her poor son Martin in her book
My Story. She describes how he could NOT operate simple things like door
latches or assembling Meccano toy parts. Martin was/is incompetent;
_ Martin’s mother Carleen Bryant and Martin’s female friend at the time
Petra Willmott, have both stated in writing that they had NOT seen firearms
or ammunition of any kind at Martin’s home (see MASS MURDER);
_ There is NO hard evidence Martin Bryant shot any person at or near
Port Arthur. Witnesses, including several who were shot, said in writing
the gunman was NOT Martin Bryant (see LEAKED DOCUMENTS);
_ There are NO fingerprints, NO gun shot residue, NO blood, NO fibres,
NO hair, NO DNA, etc. that prove Martin Bryant was at Port Arthur. That
officials say a person is guilty does NOT prove he/she is guilty;
_ Martin Bryant did NOT fix the vehicle Gaye Lind and companion Vicki
were driving to Port Arthur. He could NOT do auto-electric repairs. And it
was NOT Martin who bought marijuana from them. He did NOT use drugs;
_ The gunman carried a sports bag containing firearms, and a video camera,
into the Broad Arrow Café. He also handled a food tray, a plate, and a
drink container. NO fingerprints were ever taken off them by the police;
_ Martin Bryant did NOT have the ability to use any firearm in the military
manner used in the site cafe – this has been confirmed by military trained
people. There is NO hard evidence any firearm used was owned by Martin;
Witnesses have written Robert & Helene Salzmann (handlers?) did NOT
die innocently. They sat inside a yellow Volvo with the gunman at the tollbooth,
even though they knew he had been shooting at the historic site;
_ Witnesses at several crime scenes said the gunman had hair down below
his shoulders, some said flowing down to his chest. Evidence proves
that Martin Bryant did NOT have hair that long at the time of the incident;
_ The site video shows blurry distant images of an unidentifiable person.
The deceptive video appeared 90 days after the incident. On the day of the
incident, James Balsako did NOT tell police about any video he had made;
_ Martin Bryant said he carjacking a BMW at Fortescue Bay, NOT at the
site toolbooth. He could not have driven the BMW away from that tollbooth
as it had a manual-change gearbox which Martin could NOT operate;
_ Police stated in writing they saw a naked black-haired woman running
and screaming at Seascape at “about 6pm.” It was NOT the co-owner of the
house who had grey hair and who officials say was killed around midday;
_ Analysis of recordings confirm sounds at Seascape, shown on the police
transcript as coughs, are NOT coughs but the sounds of a firearm being
discharged while Martin Bryant is in another room using the phone;
_ There is NO credible time line for the incident. The time line presented by
officials is false. It omits interactions with Martin Bryant which several witnesses
experienced and described in writing (see LEAKED DOCUMENTS);
_ Martin Bryant did NOT order the 22-body refrigerated mortuary truck, or
embalming equipment “manufactured ready for the incident” (see SHOW
CAUSE NOTICE served on embalmer and Senate president Stephen Parry);
_ The Royal Australian College of Surgeons held a trauma seminar on the
morning of the incident. There was also an international media conference
that morning. Martin Bryant did NOT arrange for these gatherings;
_ Martin Bryant had NO proper legal representation. The 3rd lawyer (1st
D. Rigby; 2nd D. Gunson) was John Avery. Martin was kept in isolation for
over 6 months and Avery coerced him to change his NOT guilty plea;
_ There was NO trial, NO coronial inquest, NO public enquiry, NO royal
commission, etc. The State deliberately prevented witnesses giving their
testimony and thus the truth was NOT determined and made public; and,
_ Three criminally corrupt officials (John Avery, Damian Bugg, William
Cox) denied Martin Bryant his legal and human rights. Martin Bryant
was NOT treated properly and was wrongly convicted then imprisoned.
WHAT took place at Port Arthur in APR 1996, and thereafter, is NOT what
Channel 7 will tell its viewers. Channel 7 will NOT mention the media broadcast
doctored images of Martin Bryant making him look deranged which
biased the nation. What has taken place and is still taking place is the
worst injustice in modern-day Australia. Martin Bryant is INNOCENT! _
2 MARCH 2016
Dr. Keith Allan Noble; author
Unit 72 B, Am Heumarkt 7, 1030 Vienna, Austria t. 43-1-9712401
MASS MURDER: Official Killing in Tasmania, Australia; 2nd edit, 696 pp, 2014
free pdfs MASS MURDER, SHOW CAUSE NOTICE, LEAKED DOCUMENTS from
firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, internet
29 DEC 2015
A letter to:
THE TASMANIAN BAR
Andrew James Abbott SC, William Ayliffe, Greg Barns, Kim Laura Baumeler, Raymond J. Broomhall, Aneita Browning, Bernard Cairns, Dan Coombes, Tom Cox, Kate Cuthbertson, Matthew Goldberg, Caroline Graves, Philip John Gray, Bill Griffiths, Chris Gunson, Craig Hobbs, Philip Jackson, Todd Kovacic, Joseph Lee, Bruce McTaggert, Aziz Gregory Melick, David Mitchell, Kate Mooney, Michael O’Farrell SC, Garth O’Rafferty, Keyan A.M. Pitt QC, David Porter QC, Ken Read SC, Mark Rinaldi, Mary Anne Ryan, Cameron Scott, Julian P. Siggins, Rodney J. Skiller, Ken Stanton, Garth Stevens, Charles Sweeney QC, Sandra Taglieri, Philip Theobald, Andrew Walker, Jennifer Mary White, Andrew Wood, Justin Zeeman, Phillip Zeeman.
On 21 DEC 2015 (copy below) and 22 NOV 2015 (available to all readers on request), emails were sent to you and your barristerial colleagues in Tasmania.
I have been asked why you were a focus in that 21 DEC 2015 email. Perhaps you have wondered, or perhaps you don’t care. You had my contact details, you could have asked me – if you wanted to know. But you never did. Regardless, I will now write a postscript here on why you are a focus in that email.
You are the only one whose listing on the Tasmanian Bar website (http://www.tasmanianbar.com.au/) is accompanied by a formal image – that is, an image of the listee wearing formal court dress of gown, jabot, and wig (see image below). This is the professional image you and your fellow barristers like to promote. Barristers – Officers of the Court – professional-looking, there in the courts ethically defending your clients. But really Cameron, can you tell me which barrister in Tasmania fought for Martin Bryant?
Aaaaah, you might say. He pleaded guilty so there was NO TRIAL. But your colleague John Avery rammed his guilty plea down poor Martin’s throat – after Martin had been kept in isolation for over six months during which he was tormented until he was broken. Martin always said he was NOT GUILTY, until they broke him. Now Cameron, do you really think a mentally incompetent boy-man with an IQ of 66 knew what was really going on, and what all the legal implications were for him? Do you believe that the criminal of a lawyer John Avery did the right thing for his client? Is what Avery did to Martin Bryant what you would have done? Avery said he had nothing to work with – he had no exculpatory evidence he said. This is pure bullshit. Have you ever studied all the witness statements? Exculpatory evidence screams out. Go and read LEAKED DOCUMENTS, which is an exposé of the statements which witnesses of the Port Arthur massacre thought would be used in a trial, but which were ignored by your Jewish legal colleague Damien Bugg the prosecutor. To hell with Gordon Hewart. Justice was seen not to be done.