Dodgy Tasmania police still covering up Port Arthur scam

from Port Arthur researcher and author Dr Keith Noble

No reply from Tasmania Police Commissioner Darren Hine  which makes him, like former PM John Howard, complicit in Australia’s first government sanctioned terror event


Thank you for your attention to the following non-copyrighted letter. An archivist in Tasmania ( presented an egregious paper at the national conference of the Australian Society of Archivists conducted in Perth, Western Australia, on 25-28SEP2018. Details related to Ottavi’s presentation plus an image of her appear on p.xviii of the bookOFFICIALTERROR…. (768pp). [amended 05MAR2019]What follows are some of Ottavi’s words from an electronic youtube tran-script.

Tasmania Police Commissioner Darren Hine coverup man for deep state

No copies of her paper were made available to the public by Ottavi, or by the Australian Society of Archivists, or by Tasmania Police. WHY?: I…registered it into our system it became known as transfer to nine zero zero….; …Tasmania Police rec-ords of the Port Arthur massacre will be open to the public in 2071….; …they are an e75 access restric-tion which means they’re closed for 75 years and the e means that only one person or position can grant access in this case only the Commissioner of Police.

Given Tasmania Police is a public agency funded 100 percent by taxpay-ers to serve not deny the public, Ottavi’s words are shocking. They have generated more concern in Australia re the official terror at and near Port Arthur, Tasmania (28-29APR1996), a massacre in which international and national victims were killed (35) and wounded (23). Thus in relation to the boldface italicized words of Ottavi as appear above, you are herewith requested to address the three queries following:

  1. Are Ottavi’s words an accurate description of the official policy re the availability of Port Arthur massacre records held by Tasmania Police?; 2. Under what legislation are the Port Arthur massacre records held by Tasmania Police being secreted away from the public for 75 years?; 3. Under what legislation has the police commissioner been appointed sole arbiter of access re Port Arthur massacre records now held by Tasmania Police and now secreted away from the public for 75 years? 1/2 c



A copy of this letter appears in OFFICIAL TERROR…. [amended 05MAR2019]Space for your replies to the three queries will be reserved in said book until 28FEB2019. If you do not reply, then your unacceptable failing will be highlighted in said book, and elsewhere in and out of Australia. Also note that if you fail to reply, it is understandable people will conclude there is no legislation in Tasmania that permits the withholding of public documents and/or permits a public servant (you) to be sole arbiter of access to public documents. If such legislation exists, it identifies Tasmania as a police state (a government that exercises power arbitrarily through the power of the police force– wikipedia). And finally, some points of concern for you – and our other readers: a)

You are a senior member of Australia & New Zealand SEBP (Society of Evidence Based Policing Inc.) On one hand it seems you value “Evidence Based Policing.” But on the other you are willing to ignore exculpatory evidence confirming Martin Bryant is INNOCENT – this boy-man (66 IQ) is the patsy. Not only ignore it, but as a gate- keeper you are now participating in the withholding of exculpatory evidence from the public for 75 years.

Surely you understand the immorality of Bryant being denied an ethical lawyer, of him having his persistent NOTguiltyplea rejected,of him being falsely convicted with NO trial, of him being incarcerated in Risdon Prison since 1996, etc. b)Let us not forget James Boyce’s LOSING STREAK: How Tasmania Was Gamed by the Gaming Industry. That officials covered up crimes is revealed in his 2017 book: “…at some point the file was accidentally misplaced or deliberately destroyed, and it cannot be located.”

Corrupt officials do this with files containing truths dangerous to them. Dr.Boyce goes on:”The current police commissioner [you] has refused to give permission for the release of further supplementary material.” So it seems you have withheld evidence in this gambling case. If true, the long-deceived people of Australia, especially families, relatives, and friends of all 58 victims officially shot at Port Arthur, can expect nothing from you re the records secreted byTasmania Police.

Sincerely, Dr.KeithAllanNOBLE;author Unit 72 B, Am Heumarkt 7 1030 Vienna, AUSTRIA t. 43-1-9712401


About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on November 9, 2019, in big brother, General, Port Arthur, Tasmania and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 11 Comments.

  1. That’s what cowards & traitors do, they operate in dark & secret, then run away & hide…

  2. After some research and seeing the pattern – this young fellow with the mind of a child could not possibly do what was described as a “highly skilled” shooting.. Very sad.. for all of us..

  3. Keith Noble is not the only person who wrote letters, i also wrote to Darren Hine requesting he investigate Damien Bugg for lying to the Court and presenting False evidence like wise i was ignored by him

  4. Melissa Johnson

    Thank you for reporting the truth.
    Perhaps you could include this You-tube from Boss/Maker on your website.


    Ron McGill

  6. Andrew Mackinnon

    I used to think that Martin Bryant was an innocent scapegoat who has languished in prison since 1996. I am now convinced that Martin Bryant played the role of the gunman for the purpose of the official story without committing any of the murders and that he is not in prison but is living somewhere free under a new identity. I believe that the interviews his mother provided to the media were just staged theatre to support the idea that he is actually serving time in prison.

  7. Megan Holliday

    I have never replied on anything frootloop conspiracy,,, enthusiasts have said about Martin Bryant, but reading boycott Tasmania, what 26 years after the event infuriated me, so, fact no.1 when I was 22 long before PA, I was standing at a bus stop with my youngest son, this young blonde guy was standing near us, he kept moving around putting his hands in and out of his pockets, I avoided looking at him which I don’t do, I will talk to ANYBODY but my gut said go, so I started walking, as I was walking I thought, 🤔 maybe he just had something wrong with him, I turned around and he was only about 4 steps behind me!!!! It was Martin Bryant, he followed me and my baby for 3 bus stops, when the bus came I was so scared I could barely get my bus fare out, he stood across the road and watched us get on that bus knowing that I was visibly distressed by him,2 most important,bmy brother freinds were at Port Arthur when the shooting started, it WAS Martin Bryant, if there were other shooters they would have made sure it was known, they watched in hiding as he just mowed people down, he used to be allowed into port Arthur for free, and it pissed him off that he couldn’t do that anymore, and 3rd my ex husband is a prison warden at Risdon, he has only met him twice, and the wardens have obviously spoke about this amongst themselves and they have no doubt, this is Tasmania!!! We had never had a gun problem where something like that would need to happen, nor have we had one since, I stood right beside this man, low iQ sure, man fking child NOT A CHANCE 😠😠😠 TALK TO THE FAMILIES HE POINTED HIS GUN AT IF YOU WANT THE TRUTH,but why let the truth stand in the way of a good conspiracy right 🤨.

  8. Thanks for your comment. Was Martin Bryant the only long blonde haired man in Tasmania? Editor

  9. what I know there is
    No finger prints…..No DNA….No photos…….Today you cannot charge a suspect WITH EVIDENCE.

  10. It’s time for the people to know the truth and for these scum bags to face jail time before we reach the point of ni return wake up people and take action demand accountability.

  11. Mr G. H Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

    I was not at Port Arthur and so cannot claim to know if Martin Bryant was or was not involved in the shooting. However more than 50 years ago when in the Dutch Royal Army I succeed in achieving the first prize in a battalion shooting competition on all weapons. I had a near perfect score of 39 out of 40 whereas the second place gather was 29 out of 40 and all the rest far less than that. If indeed it is claimed that Martin Bryant was able to shoot and kill 20 people in 90 seconds from the hip, and considering he would have to be shooting at moving targets, then I do not accept such a scenario may be reasonably accepted.
    Megan Holliday in her post present parts of 2 eye witnesses. And, I am not going to place in question that they were not telling the truth. They may very well have done so but the question is what they held to be the truth was this factual? Over decades of cross-examining witnesses I for example cross examined 3 medical doctors each having their sworn Affidavits. I accepted that each of them was telling the truth, but the truth they were stating was not factual as I was able to prove to the court. Each doctor when asked about other matters they admitted not to know about, albeit it was as evidence before the court, admitted that if what they knew was not about all factual issues then their Affidavit must be accepted upon what they only knew. As such, each Affidavit was relating to circumstances that never existed as such. People often will interpret something to whatever they saw. People trying to hide may have rather not bothered to take a close look at who did the actual shooting. In one case opposing Counsel submitted even GPS charts to show where precisely each photo identified by the 2 witnesses was taken. As such making clear there could be no doubt about the location each photo was made. During cross-examination both emphatically insisted that those photo’s were taken by GPS from the location stated and were of the same building. I then stated to tone of the witnesses: I put it to you that you are not telling the truth, are you?” The trial judge interrupted me asking me if I was calling the witness a lair. I responded that the witness was the best person to clarify this. I then asked the witness to look at one of the photo’s which showed a white timber house with a red galvanized roof and yet the other picture he identified being the same house was with a white roof. The witness then admitted it couldn’t be the same house and when asked where the other photo was taken he actually admitted he didn’t even know where the building was. And, this is what proper cross-examination is about. To bring out conflicts of factual matters. Did anyone videoed a competent trained police offer or army man to demonstrate being able to shoot 20 moving objects in 90 seconds that would be deadly? If a competently trained person could not manage this then how could Martin Bryant have performed such a feat I wonder. As for recognizing Martin Bryant as a bus stop. There was this man who was (in the USA) imprisoned for rape, he all along denied having been involved in. He already served some 18 years when he got a new cell mate boasting about the rapes he had committed. So this man having already served 18 years was smart enough to get the others DNA and passed it on to Authorities, and they found he was a match to the rape incident. Yet, the victim afterwards made clear that even so she now knew he never raped her to her he still remains in her memory the rapist.
    It is not uncommon that someone having seen some image of an alleged criminal then has this image in mind regardless this image belongs to an innocent person. As I understand it shortly after the shooting the picture of Martin Bryant was going around and this could very well have caused incorrect detail in the memory of those claiming to rely upon their memory. Let us keep in mind that there is far too much doubt in what really eventuated in Port Arthur and the community is not served at all if an innocent person is imprisoned. Hence the truth must be properly explored. I do not accept that a 75 restriction can be justified, as that in itself can be deemed to cover up something. We, the People have a right to know the truth!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.