Bryant should have had due legal process

Letter to the Editor

Whether Martin Bryant is innocent or guilty is irrelevant, what is relevant is that a man has been jailed for life without following due process, sect 80 of the constitution guarantees a trial by jury of one peers, it’s a basic right that dates back 800 year to a document that ended up being the foundation for the creation of governments.

Unless you are communists you have no reason to argue against Bryant’s right to trial, the last this thing that the people of Australia should be undertaking is giving the government freedom to circumvent proper due process, even the most honest politicians(government) can be subverted let alone one that it already known to be corrupt, conspiracy theorists keep governments in check.

I’m trying to understand why people who don’t believe Bryant is innocent are reacting in such a manner, why so angry and defensive, I don’t understand why you would be against having the justice system serve the people and carry out the task it is intended for, I thought you would have more confidence in the judicial system and government that you are so adamantly defending.

A reader says whether Martin Bryant is guilty or not he should have been afforded due legal process as mandated by the Constitution. And a full coronial inquiry should have been held, which on the finding of the limited inquiry held in Tasmania would have found Bryant innocent.

I found some information regarding the port Arthur shooting that is only mentioned on a few occasions.

Martin Bryant inherited 27 million from his old lay friend who was the niece of George Adams (tattersalls) , retroactive laws made after the shooting allowed the government to access those funds for the victims, 3 million was paid out to the victims and 24 million went to admin fees. (disarming the public is not the only motive)

The serial number of AR15 used in the shooting was traced back to the 1987 Melbourne gun amnesty , the firearm was acquired by the Victoria S.O.G’s which is not unusual , they get to keep certain firearms and use them for police work, the part that is not okay is the firearm ending up in Port Arthur 9 years later.

The commonwealth bank employee that was in the cafe recognized the gunman and stood up and yelled “not in here” before the gunman shot and killed him ( he was also an ex asio agent)

Editor, cairnsnews you have done your research on the Port Arthur incident, but you certainly have no idea what you are talking about when it comes world war 2 and Adolf Hitler, you are making the same mistake that your adversaries are making.

Hitler did not disarm the German people, Hitler expressed his disgust with the communist parties disarming Hitler labelled these Bolshevist as traitors in a speech.

I for the life of me cannot understand why so many people cannot see this pattern that keeps repeating.

To many people have this ill conceived perception that the world is perfect , that there is no evil, people perceive the world as if it is the movie clip of Julia Andrews singing ” the hills are alive with the sound of music”.

I can assure you that no man in history has been misrepresented the way Hitler has been misrepresented, you are talking about a very educated, creative, empathetic and intelligent, who was democratically elected, who rebuilt Germany’s broken economy, who was a vegetarian because he couldn’t bare to kill an animal, who was responsible for creating laws against cruelty to animals, who banned all the smut art that the Bolsheviks brought over with them when the were finished destroying Russia, the man that watch Churchill’s planes bomb Germany for 3 months without retaliating, the man that kept pleading for peace while Churchill kept bombing, Hitler refrained from retaliation until Polish Jews murdered 5000 Germans that were living just over the Germany border in a polish town,then he was blamed for the murders claiming it was Hitlers propaganda designed to initiate a war.

Here we are 2020 the year of the covid-19,I’m seeing the world through a sentient beings eyes and it is crystal clear, while many see it through sheep’s eyes, and i’m in noway condoning the behavior of the evil beings that control this world but these damn sheep who suffer from severe cognitive dissonance are the ones that make all these atrocities possible, this dimwits are happy to jail an innocent man and allow psychopath cold blooded murdered go free before they have their ego bruised. I am absolutely disgusted and at my wits end with these types of pathetic excuses for human being, what kind of absolute moron argues against his own inalienable inherent right, why is it so hard for your people to see right from wrong, it’s because you bloody don’t have a clue what is right and wrong, get a grip of your righteous self and wake up. if you want to live under a communist regime you wish is about to come to fruition.

What kind of moron argues with such conviction against his own rights, looks like you’re going to get you wish, the communist cabal has arrived in our neck of the woods as many of the conspiracy theorist figured they would, just our luck, we don’t have any semi automatic rifles to defend ourselves with, and even if Bryant did it, does that mean that were are supposed to get our asses handed to us by this tyrant government.

These sheep wont believe that we are under attack because it will be our police that initiate this attack on the Australian people , they have already started and the people are supporting their actions —> “thank you Vicpol for making people wear masks and saving my precious life how dare these people risk my life just because they are trying to protect everyone’s rights, shoot and kill anyone that puts my life in danger”

I honestly thought people were much smarter but I was obviously wrong, the majority of people are so damn stupid and even if you try to educate then you wont get anywhere, they become so engaged in the argument defending what they believe, they don’t realize how stupid they look because they are opposed to common sense, 800 years of common law, basic fundamental rights, law of equity, the bible, western democratic society and logic.

The more i see this people and their subjective argument the more I realize how this country has become a communist country overnight, these subverted fools have helped usher in the Bolsheviks, these fools that watch the 6 o’clock news and believe that the majority of the 26 million people in Australia are murdering,criminal,drug dealing, violent, bank robbing, street racer, outlaw, tax evading, psychopaths who are a straw on a camels back away from dowsing their family and pets with fuel and striking the match, while these dumb asses cheers our government on for implementing road side speed detection cash registers, random blood alcohol testing of sober motorists and we can’t forget the fining notorious p plater not displaying P’s, registration or license expired psychos, busting weed smoking pablo escabar serial killers, thanks to you morons that have been subverted, we are all F**KED now, you people allowed this to happen, you useless POS caused this, F**K you and your precious enslaved life, we’ll see if your life is going to be worth living now , you wanted a communist police state, you got it.

Stephen T,

Victoria

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on August 31, 2020, in General, Port Arthur and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 14 Comments.

  1. Upon reading this, I thought of the lost sheep parable,..and the shepherd searched till it was found, and much celebration ensued,…could that be a parallel to Bryant ?,…get him justice, set him free, since until the prosecution proves their case, Bryant is free …,; much celebration would occur since the very lost sheep, in this case is freed and Rightness in law is found and restored .

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

    Like

  2. Rosemary Tempany

    BRAVO, Stephen T , ain’t that so true.
    Martin was clearly an ” amazing human” almost a DISNEY like character to have achieved what he did.
    Not to diminsh the relationship between the PM of the time & the US President, of course.
    And talk about synchronisity the same pair were actually in Washington together for 9/11.
    What a surprise.

    Like

  3. Most definitely he should’ve had the proper process but they filed in this but there’s a reason why they filed because I didn’t want the truth to come out just like what is happening with this Covid BS how could one man possibly handle so many weapons With such accuracy it’s totally impossible and if you have firearms you will understand this it is political just like Covid is political and eventually people will understand but they have taken this man’s life as well as many other men

    Like

  4. When Martin’s lawyer convinced Martin to plead guilty (despite Martin knowing what he had done and didn’t do ), then under some circumstances a trial is no longer necessary.
    Given that the lawyer later was jailed for corruption, and could be said to have a character unfit to represent Martin, thereby depriving him of a fair trial and natural justice, a savy legal professional could find grounds for an appeal.

    And adding further to this, Martin was a ward of the State, and was never protected by his guardian ( which is the State – see the inherent conflict! ) from having his acknowledged intellectual deficiency being used against him.

    Certainly Martin never got natural justice, and with the savage pr targeted against him, good men and women have been intimidated from standing up against this injustice.

    Like

  5. Yes lots of good points – but it’s true – people have been dumbed down ( fluoride, vaccines, education etc) to the point where they don’t seek, not really want to know, the truth..Because I think it is just too horrible..But what is comming will be far worse – Agenda 2030 is no work of fantasy..

    Like

  6. Spot on mate

    Like

  7. 100% agree. as I said ….the Communist criminals are ORGANISED while the rest of the sheep are DISORGANISED COWARDS………they deserve there fate.

    Look what is Happening in England and Berlin street protests… .the people are fighting back !
    while in oz……….. people are putting another shrimp on the Barbie……..she’ll be right mate!

    Like

  8. > Dear editor

    We have been told Bryant received a fair trial and the majority will always believe what they see on TV.

    However, I believe if you check you will find that a court (all Australian courts) cannot accept a guilty plea from person who has a mental disability. The trial must go ahead as if the accused pleaded not guilty. This was introduced to prevent Police convincing the person to plea guilty as it will be their best option or some other reason regardless of their guilt or innocence.

    The court having accepted Bryant’s guilty plea is , in my opinion is a miscarriage of justice and needs to be put right.

     A retrial with a competent legal representation for Bryant is the only way to resolve the matter.

    cheers   Terry

    > Editor, cairnsnews posted: “Letter to the Editor Whether Martin Bryant > is innocent or guilty is irrelevant, what is relevant is that a man > has been jailed for life without following due process, sect 80 of the > constitution guarantees a trial by jury of one peers, it’s a basic right” >

    Like

  9. Is violation of the Magna Carta to such an extent a hanging offence ?

    Like

  10. That was very well written, I’m caught up in this mess as well locked up like a prisoner in Sydney that I have given to consent to, I am awake and I agree wholeheartedly with you,
    I’ll write another story about the lockup that’s now taking place right in the centre of Sydney CBD, two people have asked this question and I’m one of them…Q. Why lock up so many so called covid people with a so called supposed to be virus right in the heart of a large populated city? Not one of the asxxxes that I have emailed has bothered to email me any of my Questions, Government departments, premier,health minister, ombudsman etc etc, this is the biggest scam to take over a world.
    Peter Rogers

    Like

  11. It is my comprehension that a “prisoner” cannot plead guilty to murder as that amounts to committing suicide so even IF he pled guilty, a trial by jury is mandatory, however I’m prepared to concede that that mandate may have been repealed when hanging for murder was repealed.
    On a different note, a ballistics expert friend (and sniper in Vietnam, now sadly dead) always insisted that there were only about a dozen marksmen in the world that could have pulled off what Bryant was said to have done, AND HE WASN’T ONE OF THEM!.

    Like

  12. You wouldn’t know a true communist.

    Like

  13. An ex Vietnam Vet who in 2000 was running Glenlyon Dam Tenterfield (NSW/QLD border stated to me things that did and didn’t come out in the MSM reporting…
    1, Channel 7 showed a picture of the alleged shooter(Byrant)… before police could even identify the perpetrator.

    2, MSM never mentioned in their coverage of the event of a vehicle being immobilised.

    Yet underground news reporting did in fact mention how a vehicle was immobilised with 1 round, something the ex vet said at the time… “there are only 7 people in the world that he knew of, have the skill and ability to perform such an action and it is only of those with the highest of military training.

    3, underground news reporting also stated that Two (2) police officers about to go for their meal break who were within the restaurant perimeter, called in noticing an entity baring a firearm and could they intervene, which they were told to stand down and remove themselves from the area.

    Now if at the time a police officers duty was to protect innocence, why would police coms tell the two officers to stand down and leave the area?

    In short the ex V/Vet said as much… the whole event was black ops with one designed agenda…. and that was the end result to disarm the masses via public outcry.

    Government works in a realm of cause and effect…. create the cause to obtain the effect.

    Like

  14. The Howard Covernant is exposed many,many times about to explode the truth of an establishment mission at any cost

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.