A real statesman of the Australian Senate exposes the Covid scam – let the trials begin of those who killed or injured thousands of Australians by experimental vaxx
I have no doubt that, as the truth comes to light, history will judge those in this Parliament as cowards for failing to stand up against the COVID B.S.
Hansard: As a servant to the people of Queensland and Australia, I note that at the European parliament inquiry into COVID two weeks ago, Janine Small, the President of International Developed Markets for Pfizer revealed that the Pfizer vaccine injection was never tested to see if it would prevent transmission—never tested. Small went on to say this was because Pfizer had to work at the speed of science. Well, it seems the speed of science and the velocity of money are the same thing. Shameful decisions were taken deliberately to facilitate big pharma getting their injections to market in time. The mouthpiece media have the same large investment funds on their share register as big pharma. It’s no surprise the mouthpiece media amplified the COVID scare, doubling down on fear porn and demonising anyone who clung to ‘my body, my choice’, just so the media’s shareholders could line their pockets with tens of billions of dollars in windfall profits.
I remember when the political left walked behind banners reading ‘my body, my choice’. Now real conservatives hold those banners high while the Left abuse us. How fast the Left abandon their principles when an opportunity to tell people what to do comes along, to control people. It was clear after just four months of COVID the scary Chinese videos of people dropping dead in the streets should not have been taken at face value. Measures taken out of an abundance of caution in March 2020 should have been re-examined just a few months later, as we requested and suggested. They never were. At the time, the data clearly showed COVID was no more deadly than a severe flu and well under anything the public would consider to be a pandemic. Let me support that statement.
The following data is from the Australian Bureau of Statistics published in part as a result of a One Nation document discovery a few weeks ago. In 2019, the year before COVID, the seasonal flu cost 4,126 lives. The next year, in 2020, Australia recorded 882 deaths from COVID and 2,287 deaths from the flu for a total of 3,196 deaths, 1,000 less than before COVID, almost a thousand less than the flu alone killed the previous year. In 2021, 1,137 deaths were recorded from COVID and 2,073 from the flu, for a total of 3,210. This means deaths from the flu including COVID across the first two years of the so-called pandemic were right on the long-term average of 3,255. There was nothing unusual about the Australian death rate in 2020 or 2021 yet the COVID substances—I won’t call them vaccines—the COVID injections, were given emergency approval. The only thing about our death rate in 2020 that was unusual was that it was at a seven-year low.
These are facts. This makes a joke of provisional approval granted for injections out of urgency. There was no urgency. It is not just the vaccines that were inappropriately approved; dangerous drugs like the antiviral Remdesivir were waved through using the same false urgency. Remdesivir’s side effects include respiratory failure and organ failure. The perfectly safe but out-of-patent antiviral ivermectin was banned to make way for remdesivir—banned, proven, banned. The UK has recently put ivermectin back into use. We must as well. The conclusion an increasing number of Australians are coming to is that our health technocrats tore up our tried and true health systems to shift products for their mates in the pharmaceutical industry, and now people are dying from those same products.
Once the injection rollout started, there was a spike in deaths. It must be noted correlation is not causation. The link between the cause—vaccines—and the effect—death, injury and suffering—must be proven. Well, it has now been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. At my second COVID Under Question inquiry in August, many highly-qualified medical professionals from around the world established that link, providing evidence the injections were responsible for many more deaths than the health technocrats admit.
Late last month, the Clinical and Experimental Immunology journal published an article entitled ‘COVID-19 vaccines—an Australian review’. The authors are Conny Turni and Astrid Lefringhausen, from the University of Queensland. This article details the medical science behind the wide range of medical harms inflicted on Australians as a result of the hubris and the criminal negligence of health technocrats. I promised to hound you people down, and now science has done that for me. The issue of vaccine harm must be referred to a royal commission today. These criminals must be brought to justice. This report is reproduced on my website, and anyone who reads this report and still defends the fake vaccines is as guilty as the companies that made it.
It’s no surprise that COVID has spiked in correlation with the rollout of the fake vaccines. ABS data is not yet available for 2022, although Australian actuarial data is. In the first four months of 2022, death from all respiratory diseases—the flu, pneumonia and COVID taken together—is still at normal levels, yet deaths from cardiac and pulmonary events are up 11 per cent, and unexplained deaths are up 13 per cent. At this rate, an extra 10,000 Australians will die in 2022. Anyone reading the journal article I referred to will know exactly why this is happening. I refuse to believe our health technocrats do not know. A royal commission must ask what they knew and when.
In May 2020 I criticised fear-driven response to COVID in the Senate, within months of this mismanagement of COVID. At that time Senator Hanson and I were the lone voices of dissent in the Senate, and Craig Kelly and George Christensen were the lone voices in the other place, and Senators Rennick and Antic joined us—six representatives out of 227 people. Everyone else in both houses displayed an ignorance of proper scientific process, an inability to read empirical data and a misplaced trust of health bureaucrats. Health technocrats have spent their entire professional lives working closely with the pharmaceutical industry. And we expected them to be impartial. Come on! We delegated authority to the last people who should have been trusted with that authority.
The Senate is the house of review. Every aspect of our COVID response should have been scrutinised to the last detail. The Senate failed in that mission. COVID measures were beyond question, and it seems they still are. Rather than review, the Senate covered up. Senators Rennick and Antic, in company with myself and Senator Hanson, tried to draw out the truth and were demonised for doing so. Not one senator amongst the political Left entertained a moment’s thought that fear-driven response could be harming more people than it helped. ‘Resistance is futile’ was the message repeated at every press conference on every television in every house of parliament. New Zealand, Canada, the UK and America all joined in the circus of despair, designed to scare people into taking a substance they knew would cause serious harm and death.
Even today, vaccine mandates are still in place around Australia. The reality of a falling birth rate, unexplained increases in deaths and more than 130,000 cases of vaccine harm here in Australia is being ignored. Still, we are told the injection is safe and effective. Safe and effective is not one lie; it is two lies. The vaccine is neither safe nor effective. Medical practitioners who stood up for the rights of their patients were deregistered after action from big pharma’s enforcement arm, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency—under the direction, it seems, of CEO Martin Fletcher and Yvette D’Ath, as chair of the Health Ministers Meeting. They’re the ones who were in control. These technocrats decided they knew what was best for patients—better than the patient’s own doctor. AHPRA must be referred to the royal commission—and the TGA, ATAGI, the Chief Medical Officer, the secretary of the federal health department and Greg Hunt, the federal health minister at the time.
The vaccine emergency use authorisation expires early next year. An inquiry into how the vaccines went would normally be conducted, but they need to stop now. The emergency authorisation needs to stop. I do not have confidence the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the TGA, and the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation, ATAGI, will be honest and impartial in this inquiry. They have not been so far. Only a royal commission can decide all of the issues I have raised tonight. One royal commissioner will not be enough for the litany of legal and regulatory abuse, medical practice, financial malfeasance, conflict of interest, child abuse, human rights abuse and the shredding of international agreements Australia has endured for 2½ years.
The harm from our COVID response was foreseeable and preventable. If only the Senate, the ultimate house of review, had had the courage to stand up and call bullshit. The Senate did not.
The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT ( Senator Chandler ): Order! Senator Roberts, that language isn’t parliamentary. I ask that you withdraw or find another word.
Senator ROBERTS: I retract that—the brown stuff.
The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT: Thank you.
Senator ROBERTS: The Senate did not. As a result, the public has lost confidence in the medical profession, health administration and politicians. To his credit, member of parliament Dan Tehan publicly admitted his silence last year was wrong. This week a survey in the Daily Telegraph found that, based on the 50,000 respondents, 37 per cent of Australians who took the vaccine regret it. Only 43 per cent said they would do it again. The damage to the reputation of our once-trusted medical institutions can only be repaired with a royal commission to unravel the lies and get to the truth, and, in so doing, ensure this tyranny, this suffering and this loss of life never happens again.
I have no doubt that, when the truth comes to light, history will judge those in this place as being cowards all. We have one flag, we are one community, we are one nation, and Australians want justice.
The Big Pharma -sponsored Therapeutic Goods Administration and its Chairman Professor John Skerritt are prosecuting anyone who imports Ivermectin for any purpose. Big Pharma has tied up the TGA and politicians so well that any alternative treatment for ‘Covid’ will be prevented no matter what.
A reader imported Ivermectin tablets from India for animal treatment but TGA’s Sam, no surname, informed him he cannot bring the Covid cure in without a permit.
Endemic corruption festers in the ranks of all bureaucracy and politics and it begs the question, how did PM Scott Morrison accumulate $52million in assets on a $450,000 per annum salary?
Cairns News is doing an investigation of Skerritt’s wealth over the past two years and will publish the results.
by Alison Ryan
January 13, 2022
Documents that showed Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were effective in treating COVID were buried
There are 67 controlled studies of Ivermectin’s effect on COVID-19 that show a 67% improvement in COVID patients. There are 298 Hydroxychloroquine studies that show a 64% improvement in patients for COVID-19 patients. Despite the science, Dr. Fauci and the medical elites have blocked the use of these effective treatments for coronavirus patients. Fauci and other top US medical leaders were in on the hydroxychloroquine lie that smeared the treatment as being ineffective and dangerous. Jeremy Farrar, director of Wellcome Trust and a WHO advisory group, was involved in two large hydroxychloroquine trials that used extreme doses that killed about 500 people and was used to sink the use of the drug for COVID.
Documents stored on the computers of the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) prove that the medicines Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and Interferon were proven “Curative” for COVID-19 in April, 2020, but the cures were buried as “Top Secret.”
Ivermectin prescribed for 200 members of the American Congress – are Australian ALP and LNP politicians doing the same?
Queensland politicians are not required to take the deadly mRNA jab…….
(Natural News) Ivermectin is a generic drug that no longer holds a patent, and this is the main reason the most famous podcaster in the world, Joe Rogan, believes that the medical industry and mainstream media are bashing him for using it to beat Covid — because there’s no money in it for pharma. Being worth only about 30 cents per dose, it’s night and day compared to vaccine profits, which the Covid jab makers are raking in by the billions. Merck and Pfizer both have their own versions of Ivermectin prescription medications, that function in the same way, killing parasites and certain viral pathogens (they just aren’t marketing them because of money, control and the clot shot “therapy” agenda).
Pulmonary and Critical Care Specialist, and President of Frontline (FLCCC) Alliance, Dr. Pierre Kory, has already prescribed Ivermectin for 200 people in Congress
Dr. Pierre Kory from FLCCC treated Joe Rogan, along with 200 members of Congress, with monoclonal antibodies, prednisone, Z-pak, NAD, vitamins and ivermectin. Yes, ivermectin, the medication the entire medical complex and mainstream media are calling “horse medicine” and “horse de-wormer.”
Dr. Pierre Kory, on his website, reveals a very informative study done on Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of Covid-19 infection. It’s a meta-analysis for informing clinical guidelines for use, and the paper was published recently (June of 2021) by the American Journal of Therapeutics. The conclusion? Simple:
“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.”
Dr. Kory goes on to tell us that ivermectin is a well-known, FDA-approved drug that’s been used successfully for 4 decades to treat specific diseases, in humans, not just farm animals. It’s one of the safest drugs ever, but that’s not what the Covid tyranny leaders want us to know.
Ivermectin is also on the World Health Organization’s list of ESSENTIAL medicines. Let that sink in for a minute. Is that what you’re hearing on the news, or from the doctors at the hospitals? Ivermectin has been prescribed over 3 billion times to humans. Is that also what you heard on the news or social media? Congress surely knows. They’re being prescribed ivermectin for the PREVENTION of Covid, all while pushing clot shots on Americans as our only option and telling us we lose our jobs and ability to shop for food if we don’t take them. How ironic.
One reason ivermectin is so effective at helping people beat Covid is because of its “unique and highly potent ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication and to suppress inflammation,” and that’s why Dr. Kory’s whole team prescribes ivermectin for their patients and relatives for prevention and treatment of Covid in all stages.
Even the FDA is bashing Joe Rogan for taking Ivermectin for Covid, while 200 Congressional members have already been prescribed it in secret
This whole toxic medicine push is just like mainstream medicine pushing toxic chemotherapy on nearly all cancer patients. The toxic spike protein injections, like chemotherapy, cause severe systemic inflammation and break down the immune system, sending it into a state of permanent shock (think myocarditis, more cancer and millions of microscopic blood clots forming). So the worldwide push is on to sell vaccines (they’re not free because taxpayer money funds them).
Now a very famous man has declared that Ivermectin is safer, more effective and worked for him for Covid, along with about 200 people from Congress who secretly get prescribed Ivermectin while telling the rest of the country it’s a national emergency that everyone gets the deadly clot shots.
The FDA, CDC and Congress are furious with Joe Rogan for telling the world Ivermectin is better than vaccines, even though they all use Ivermectin. It’s the same with the Covid masks, that all the politicians remove as soon as the cameras stop rolling after interviews and press conferences
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
AUSTRALIAN premiers, health ministers, CHOs and hospital administrators may be complicit in the deaths of unvaccinated COVID patients by denying them the proven COVID treatment ivermectin and instead placing them on ventilators, a wrong and frequently fatal treatment.
While the political, medical and media elite are all beating the drum to get vaccinated and claiming ivermectin is “unproven” or “ineffective” or “horse medicine” it is actually being used in the NSW hospital system and possibly Victoria as well.
Cairns News has obtained a photo of an Ivermectin prescription given to a COVID patient at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney. The patient posted a photo of his prescription on social media and angrily denounced medical authorities, media and others for misleading people about the drug.
Also angry over lies around ivermectin is a 40-year-registered Australian nurse who recently spoke at a protest rally in Brisbane. She too was aware of the drug being used in hospitals, but not on unvaccinated COVID patients – only the vaccinated ones who presented with reinfection.
“They’re surviving COVID and walking out of the hospitals and they’re going and saying ‘look, the vaccine saved me’,” she said. “It wasn’t the vaccine that saved them it was the ivermectin. And those that are unvaccinated and presenting with COVID, guess what they’re doing with them. They’re putting them on ventilators and ventilators are the wrong treatment for people with COVID. It causes pulmonary edema (excessive fluid on the lungs) and they drown.” The nurse said this treatment was responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans in 2020.
Now that it’s widely known that mRNA and other COVID vaccines do not stop transmission or reinfection with COVID, the catch cry is “the vaccine reduces the severity of symptoms and hospital stays”. That is very likely an outright lie. In fact the whole thing smells like criminal deception and reckless endangerment of life for the purpose of promoting a product. They deny there’s an effective treatment other than the vaccine, and then quietly administer the treatment drug to the vaccinated and reinfected in order to support their narrative that the vaccine makes recovery easy.
According to the US FDA, whose advice is echoed by the Australian TGA, “The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals”. So with data on trials of the drug available since mid-2020 and strong support from medical professionals, why wasn’t it given emergency use status like the vaccines?
They then go on to misleadingly state: “Currently available data do not show Ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. Clinical trials assessing ivermectin tablets for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in people are ongoing.” Their own link shows 80 trials for the drug, some of which have been completed.
The American medical research group Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has found extensive research data in support of the drug, which has been in widespread use against COVID in India, Africa and South America.
LNP government and medical mafia corruption knows no bounds. Most doctors and the AMA know that Ivermectin has been prescribed around the world to successfully cure Covid. Here they capitulate to the medical mafia without a wimper. Doctors too could be in the firing line when it hits the fan for this treachery.
from TGA September 10, 2021
Today, the TGA, acting on the advice of the Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling, has placed new restrictions on the prescribing of oral ivermectin. General practitioners are now only able to prescribe ivermectin for TGA-approved conditions (indications) – scabies and certain parasitic infections. Certain specialists including infectious disease physicians, dermatologists, gastroenterologists and hepatologists (liver disease specialists) will be permitted to prescribe ivermectin for other unapproved indications if they believe it is appropriate for a particular patient.
These changes have been introduced because of concerns with the prescribing of oral ivermectin for the claimed prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discouraged by the National COVID Clinical Evidence Taskforce, the World Health Organisation and the US Food and Drug Administration.
Firstly, there are a number of significant public health risks associated with taking ivermectin in an attempt to prevent COVID-19 infection rather than getting vaccinated. Individuals who believe that they are protected from infection by taking ivermectin may choose not to get tested or to seek medical care if they experience symptoms. Doing so has the potential to spread the risk of COVID-19 infection throughout the community.
Secondly, the doses of ivermectin that are being advocated for use in unreliable social media posts and other sources for COVID-19 are significantly higher than those approved and found safe for scabies or parasite treatment. These higher doses can be associated with serious adverse effects, including severe nausea, vomiting, dizziness, neurological effects such as dizziness, seizures and coma.
Finally, there has been a 3-4-fold increased dispensing of ivermectin prescriptions in recent months, leading to national and local shortages for those who need the medicine for scabies and parasite infections. It is believed that this is due to recent prescribing and dispensing for unapproved uses, such as COVID-19. Such shortages can disproportionately impact vulnerable people, including those in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.
There is only one TGA approved oral ivermectin product, Stromectol ivermectin 3mg tablet blister pack which is indicated for the treatment of river blindness (onchocerciasis), threadworm of the intestines (intestinal strongyloidiasis) and scabies.
All medical practitioners can continue to prescribe oral ivermectin for the approved indications. However, prescribing of oral ivermectin for indications that are not approved is now limited to certain specialists.
Letter to the Editor
This vid amongst other things explains why they will not acknowledge invermectin or any other drug to fight Covid.
The EUA emergency use authority can only operate when there is no viable alternative.
Any alternative would immediately take all current vaccines off the market and that would stop the billions of dollars profits the big pharma are currently reaping.
Hence I revert to my first assumption: Follow the money.
If you support the vaccines or not it is irrelevant, the point is there is a concerted and very well managed effort, world wide, to dupe the public where people who should be looking out for us are either stupid or on the take.
If they were concerned about our health they would try any drug to slow down or stop this covid, as presently they are forcing us to believe there is NO option other than the vaccines.
I wonder how many `trusted’ officials are on the take from the WHO down.
When you consider how many medical teams in universities and other places (govt and private industry) rely on big pharma grants to survive you can see how insidious it is and how the game is being played at the publics (how many deaths so far?) expense.
I could go on but I think the vid speaks for its self.
from Geoff Chester, Brisbane
By TONY MOBILIF0NITIS
AS Indian states deploy the cheap and effective anti-viral drug Ivermectin and wipe out COVID-19 infections and deaths, public health officers and premiers in Australia are persisting with their bogus and diabolical fear-mongering game of case counts and lockdowns.
These bureaucrats and politicians who love the dramatic COVID coverage should wake up and realize the people of Australia are not only sick of it but disgusted by their lying, duplicitous and dictatorial behaviour. The same goes for the big media channels who are part of this charade.
An example of their duplicity is that the same actors refuse to even mention Ivermectin or other inexpensive treatments for their dreaded virus. Oh no, they have billions of dollars invested in vaccines and only vaccines can save us – or so the story goes. But there’s also the big problem that most Australians don’t want these “jabs” because they offer “occasional prizes” like blood clots and even death. But that was AstraZeneca and they’ve revised the advice for that one now.
So you might like to try Pfizer-Biontech mRNA vaccine as an alternative? Sorry to inform you but there’s another big problem with that one, the horrific threat of accumulation in the ovaries and bone marrow of previously untested “novel lipid reagents” contained in those vaccines. And that’s from the inventor of that technology, Dr Robert Malone, in a series of videos. Go to the 3:06 mark on the video link with Dr Malone, Bret Weinstein and Steve Kirsch. A long version is also available on TrialSiteNews.
Meanwhile in India at least four states are employing mass dosing of Ivermectin as a prophylaxis (preventative) treatment. Indian data analyst Juan Chamie noted that in the state of Uttarakhand, cases had dropped from 9642 in May to less than 200 now. Fatalaties had fallen from 223 a day to only three now. Indonesia has also jumped on the Ivermectin bandwagon for mass treatment, while Singapore has dropped all public announcements about “cases” except those that end up in hospitals.
Also fighting for the cause of Ivermectin is the Indian Bar Association, which launched a lawsuit against WHO chief scientist Dr Soumya Swaminathan, accusing her in a 71-point brief of causing the deaths of Indian citizens by misleading them about Ivermectin. The same charge should be brought against Australian health authorities for banning hydroxychloroquine.
Contrast this to the pathetic behaviour in Parliament House last February of senior Labor Party politician Tanya Plibersek, who tried to big-note herself in front of her media fans by publicly “outing” Craig Kelly for advocating Ivermectin to treat the Wuhan Lab virus.
Plibersek told Kelly she wanted Scott Morrison to intervene to “stop you spreading crazy conspiracy theories” about Ivermectin. Kelly quickly countered and told the clueless Plibersek in earshot of her media entourage, that she should take heed of the views of Professor Robert Clancy, an emeritus professor in the School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy at Newcastle University, who also advocated Ivermectin and backed Kelly’s stand.
Plibersek didn’t know how to respond, going all awkward and forcing a look of incredulity as if Kelly was telling her about the tooth fairy. She then turned to “serious” mode, saying “My mum lives in your electorate and I don’t want her exposed to people who are not going to be vaccinated because of these crazy conspiracy theories that you’re spreading.”
This MP, who has held five ministerial positions, actually believed that Craig Kelly was spreading a conspiracy theory by sharing data and medical support for a medicine that effectively treated COVID-19. Plibersek, like so many naive people who develop their worldview from TV news, had swallowed the repeated narrative that “only a vaccine can save us”. She was a real-life victim of brainwashing and psychological warfare.
But Kelly “had his day” in a recent Parliamentary sitting. The independent Member for Hughes took to the floor to give a science lesson to group-think party politicians and the Press Gallery drones who attacked him for promoting Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.
Kelly cited the multiple peer reviewed trials and studies showing the dramatic effects of the common Ivermectin on COVID-19 infections – information that has been around since the second half of 2020 when doctors and researchers in a group called Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.
Kelly’s stand for truth has cost him all the political security, perks and promotions of his previous Parliamentary Liberal Party membership. But Kelly has gained instead the respect of millions of Australians who can see through this diabolical COVID “health emergency” charade, that is being driven by malignant forces pulling strings within the health bureaucracy, the premiers and prime ministerial departments and from without by the global health mafia. This rot has to end, or Australia is in truly dire straits.
Letter to the Editor
The Ivermectin clinical trials, denied by our Government.
The US medical research group Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, cites 27 controlled trials involving a total of 6612 patients that “have been completed using well-matched control groups”; 16 trials involving over 2500 patients, “that are prospective, randomized, controlled studies”. Eleven of the 27 Ivermectin trials published in peer-reviewed journals involved 3900 patients. See the attached PDF file.
In Australia, leading medical professor Thomas Borody, who developed a globally successful therapy for peptic ulcer, announced a triple therapy off-label ivermectin-based treatment for COVID-19 in August 2020. His work was ignored by state and federal health authorities who simply continued to beat the vaccine drum.
His data shows ivermectin can not only prevent but knock out COVID infections within a few days.
OK, that’s good, but now:-
Read the text below, to find out how our Fed Health Department is “keeping Australians safe”
THE TEXT BELOW IS A TRANSCRIPT FROM THE .GOV WEBSITE AS AT 18th May, 2021
Find out how we are using evidence in our approach to COVID-19 treatments to keep Australians safe.
The Australian Government is closely monitoring worldwide research into COVID-19 treatments.
Ivermectin, doxycycline, zinc
There is currently insufficient evidence to support the safe and effective use of ivermectin, doxycycline and zinc (either separately, or in combination) for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. More robust, well-designed clinical trials are needed before they could be considered an appropriate treatment option.
The National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce, consisting of a large group of clinical experts, is continuously updating treatment recommendations based on the best available evidence. They have not made any recommendations for the use of ivermectin, doxycycline or zinc outside of properly conducted clinical trials with appropriate ethical approval.”
So our National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce is looking for “more robust, well-designed clinical trials.” Well, here they are, in the public domain. Read the attached PDF file.
This information is sufficient evidence for action regarding the statement on their website that “The Australian Government is closely monitoring worldwide research into COVID-19 treatments.”
Well, here they are, all listed in the attached PDF file, all in the public domain.
Of course, the Taskforce do not say whether or not they will actually do anything with any new research!
Monitoring does not mean a change of outlook.
from David Blake
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
MAINSTREAM media has kept the world largely unaware that two Indian states, Goa and Uttar Pradesh have adopted mass prescription of ivermectin to fight the surge in COVID-19 cases. The heavily populated Uttar Pradesh in the north of India is claiming a high success rate. Goa is just starting.
The vaccine-pushing powers that be, of course, do not like this deviation from the global “vaccinate or else” mass extortion racket. All we have heard from India is that there is a COVID calamity and not enough vaccines to deal with it.
Goa’s Hindu nationalist BJM government has just started mass prescription of ivermectin for the COVID-19 flu virus and its variants following Uttar Pradesh, which started administering the drug last August. Goa’s Minister for Health Vishwajit Rane, said people would be given 12 mg of Ivermectin for a period of five days as prophylaxis to protect against Covid-19. The Uttar Pradesh operation has been studiously ignored by global media.
You would think people would at least say “good luck, I hope it all goes well”. But US-based Indian doctor and vaccine pusher Faheen Younus MD, has been all over Indian TV news calling for aggressive suppression of alternative treatment information as his suggested first priority for pandemic policy. On another station, Younus also repeated the big lie that there insufficient research to support ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.
The US medical research group Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance cites 27 controlled trials involving a total of 6612 patients that “have been completed using well-matched control groups”; 16 trials involving over 2500 patients, “that are prospective, randomized, controlled studies”. Eleven of the 27 trials published in peer-reviewed journals involved 3900 patients.
In Australia, leading medical professor Thomas Borody, who developed a globally successful therapy for peptic ulcer, announced a triple therapy off-label ivermectin-based treatment for COVID-19 in August. His work was ignored by state and federal health authorities who simply continued to beat the vaccine drum.
The data shows ivermectin can not only prevent but knock out COVID infections within a few days. But none of this appears to matter to Doc Younus, who seems to suggest this research is in the realm of “pseudo-science” and should be stamped out by governments so “people don’t get confused”.
The official stance of the US National Institutes of Health against ivermectin has been dropped and the agency is now neutral on the medicine, claiming (without basis) there is insufficient data to recommend either for or against its use for treating COVID-19.
So what qualifies Doc Younus to spout advice to Indian state and national governments on pandemic policy? Is it because his Twitter home page carries a large “peace” symbol or is it the Presidential Service Award he received from the Obama administration way back in 2008 for his “humanitarian services”?
The great humanitarian Doc Younus, it appears, doesn’t want people in the Indian state of Goa cured of COVID without vaccines, which makes him just another stooge playing the global control game for the Gates and Rockefeller foundations. Asked by an IDD Direct reporter why people were still getting infected or even dying after both doses of vaccines, Dr Younus trotted out what are now the standard excuses for the ineffectiveness and dangers of COVID vaccines.
“I don’t think the expectation should be that now you’re vaccinated you can go into any crowd, any situation, regardless of your immunity level, regardless of your post factors and you will be fine. Nobody ever said that, and I think that’s a mischaracterisation. The reality is a vaccine is likely to make your infection weaker and ideally, not make you infected at all.”
Goa State Health Minister Rane said the ivermectin campaign was based on studies by expert panels from the UK, Italy, Spain and Japan “which found a statistically significant reduction in mortality and recovery time in patients with Covid-19”. According to the Indian Express the government’s decision to administer the drug to the entire population comes as its vaccination program for the 18-44 age group is not expected to start until the third week of May.
Uttar Pradesh first tested ivermectin in May-June 2020, when a team at Agra, led by Dr Anshul Pareek, administered it to health workers on an experimental basis. “It was observed that none of them developed Covid-19 despite being in daily contact with patients who had tested positive for the virus,” Uttar Pradesh State Surveillance Officer Vikssendu Agrawal told the Indian Express.
He said since the first wave ivermectin helped the state maintain a relatively low positivity rate despite its high population density. “Despite being the state with the largest population base and a high population density, we have maintained a relatively low positivity rate and cases per million of population.”
On August 6th, the state Health Department introduced Ivermectin as prophylaxis for close contacts of COVID patients, health workers as well as for the treatment of the patients themselves through a government order, after a committee headed by the director general of, Medical and Health Services, gave it the go ahead.
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
THE battle against the suppression of ivermectin, probably the most effective treatment for “SARS-Cov-2” (or any variant of corona virus), has stepped up in New York state with at least three families winning court actions to force hospitals to administer the drug to loved ones suffering infections. The recoveries have been remarkable.
The court actions fly in the face of the Biden administration’s Federal Drug Administration, which has issued a blatantly dishonest statement that ivermectin “can be very dangerous”. Oh sure, if you take a livestock-level dose of ivermectin, squirt it on your back like a bull, and you could die. But the drug has been given to humans for 33 years in billions of doses and was awarded a Nobel Prize for annihilating parasitic illness.
Big tech companies Facebook and YouTube and mainstream media are also actively and criminally suppressing videos and other information on a treatment shown to be literally a life-saving medical intervention.
Freelance journalist Mary Beth Pfeiffer, writing for the medical website Trialsitenews.com, says the FDA statement is the lynchpin of COVID policies worldwide and “purports to protect the public from taking over-the-counter ivermectin meant for animals”.
Pfeiffer has also reported on the Yale University professor and renowned cancer researcher Dr Alessandro Santin, who has studied the COVID-19 literature and treated several dozen patients. The practicing oncologist and scientist who runs a large laboratory at Yale believes firmly that ivermectin could vastly cut suffering from COVID-19. How about that for a story BBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN etc?
But not all media is willingly blind to life-saving truth. In New York state Dan Herbeck at the Buffalo News reported on the case of John W. Swanson, an 81-year-old farmer from Stafford, east of Buffalo, who was infected and placed on a ventilator, a dangerous and frequently fatal treatment. According to his affidavit he was ‘on death’s doorstep’ at United Memorial Medical Center. When Swanson was given one dose of ivermectin, he started breathing properly again.
But the doctors, probably acting on orders from above, then refused to give follow-up doses. Swanson’s family moved swiftly for justice and his wife Sandra hired the same lawyers who convinced other New York State judges to compel other hospitals to administer ivermectin to dying patients.
TrialSite staff have reported at least three cases where families of elderly or seriously ill COVID-19 infected patients were denied ivermectin treatments. While dozens of studies (see meta-analysis below) from around the world show overwhelmingly positive results, regulatory authorities and apex research bodies are hesitant to accept any of the positive data yet and have pounced on any data that shows neutral results.
They also carried ongoing reporting on the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and other reports of the accumulating positive data associated with ivermectin research around the world. This data has apparently been reviewed by family members involved in the New York cases. The families have turned to attorneys including Ralph C. Lorigo and Jon F. Minear of the West Seneca-based Law Office of Ralph C. Lorigo.
In another case, Lorigo’s firm secured a Supreme Court Judge Henry J. Nowak’s declaration that the Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital must treat 80-year-old New York State patient Judith Smentkiewicz with ivermectin. The additional treatments helped as she rapidly improved, recovered and went home, TrialSiteNews reported.
TrialSite further reported a New York Supreme Court judge Frank Caruso making a similar order for the plaintiff, Robert Dickinson, a doctor and husband of the plaintiff, in his legal request to use ivermectin off label. Rochester General Hospital was compelled to follow the physician and allow the ivermectin treatment.
Ivermectin, a medicine for parasites, has been around for four decades. While not FDA-authorized for use against COVID-19, the drug is legally available in the US and Australia for “off-label” use, i.e. available as a prescription-only treatment for conditions other than those listed on the label.
Eminent Australian professor, Thomas Borody of Sydney, released a triple therapy protocol with ivermectin, zinc and doxycyline in August 2020, but was ignored by medical authorities. However, at the time inquiries for the treatment were received from 57 Australian GPs, 30 doctors from overseas, 184 members of the public.
TrialSite said the US National Institutes of Health “conveniently hedges its position” on ivermectin but does acknowledge the off-label use scenario. “For that, they are to be commended,” TrialSite staff stated.
But they also noted high-level efforts to suppress mention of the drug on media including social media, when their documentary about ivermectin use in Peru was taken down by YouTube. They further discovered that Google was hand-selecting videos involving ivermectin for de-emphasis and hence less or no advertising remuneration, while Facebook had identified any news coverage of ivermectin as “misinformation”.
“For example, when TrialSite reported on Slovakia’s health authority approving off label use of the ivermectin for COVID-19 as a fact, which it is, Facebook punished those that posted that news link. Now, they claim that the news item was misleading, but it isn’t at all—it was and is fact,” TrialSite reported.
“This means that there is a significant misinformation agenda now underway, led by social media companies but reinforced by the interests of at least some pharmaceutical companies and kindred spirit in the regulatory bodies.”