Blog Archives

New York courts order hospitals to use COVID cure ivermectin against FDA’s misleading advice

By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
THE battle against the suppression of ivermectin, probably the most effective treatment for “SARS-Cov-2” (or any variant of corona virus), has stepped up in New York state with at least three families winning court actions to force hospitals to administer the drug to loved ones suffering infections. The recoveries have been remarkable.

The court actions fly in the face of the Biden administration’s Federal Drug Administration, which has issued a blatantly dishonest statement that ivermectin “can be very dangerous”. Oh sure, if you take a livestock-level dose of ivermectin, squirt it on your back like a bull, and you could die. But the drug has been given to humans for 33 years in billions of doses and was awarded a Nobel Prize for annihilating parasitic illness.

Big tech companies Facebook and YouTube and mainstream media are also actively and criminally suppressing videos and other information on a treatment shown to be literally a life-saving medical intervention.

Freelance journalist Mary Beth Pfeiffer, writing for the medical website Trialsitenews.com, says the FDA statement is the lynchpin of COVID policies worldwide and “purports to protect the public from taking over-the-counter ivermectin meant for animals”.

Pfeiffer has also reported on the Yale University professor and renowned cancer researcher Dr Alessandro Santin, who has studied the COVID-19 literature and treated several dozen patients. The practicing oncologist and scientist who runs a large laboratory at Yale believes firmly that ivermectin could vastly cut suffering from COVID-19. How about that for a story BBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN etc?

But not all media is willingly blind to life-saving truth. In New York state Dan Herbeck at the Buffalo News reported on the case of John W. Swanson, an 81-year-old farmer from Stafford, east of Buffalo, who was infected and placed on a ventilator, a dangerous and frequently fatal treatment. According to his affidavit he was ‘on death’s doorstep’ at United Memorial Medical Center. When Swanson was given one dose of ivermectin, he started breathing properly again.

But the doctors, probably acting on orders from above, then refused to give follow-up doses. Swanson’s family moved swiftly for justice and his wife Sandra hired the same lawyers who convinced other New York State judges to compel other hospitals to administer ivermectin to dying patients.

TrialSite staff have reported at least three cases where families of elderly or seriously ill COVID-19 infected patients were denied ivermectin treatments. While dozens of studies (see meta-analysis below) from around the world show overwhelmingly positive results, regulatory authorities and apex research bodies are hesitant to accept any of the positive data yet and have pounced on any data that shows neutral results.

They also carried ongoing reporting on the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and other reports of the accumulating positive data associated with ivermectin research around the world. This data has apparently been reviewed by family members involved in the New York cases. The families have turned to attorneys including Ralph C. Lorigo and Jon F. Minear of the West Seneca-based Law Office of Ralph C. Lorigo.

In another case, Lorigo’s firm secured a Supreme Court Judge Henry J. Nowak’s declaration that the Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital must treat 80-year-old New York State patient Judith Smentkiewicz with ivermectin. The additional treatments helped as she rapidly improved, recovered and went home, TrialSiteNews reported.

TrialSite further reported a New York Supreme Court judge Frank Caruso making a similar order for the plaintiff, Robert Dickinson, a doctor and husband of the plaintiff, in his legal request to use ivermectin off label. Rochester General Hospital was compelled to follow the physician and allow the ivermectin treatment.

Ivermectin, a medicine for parasites, has been around for four decades. While not FDA-authorized for use against COVID-19, the drug is legally available in the US and Australia for “off-label” use, i.e. available as a prescription-only treatment for conditions other than those listed on the label.

Eminent Australian professor, Thomas Borody of Sydney, released a triple therapy protocol with ivermectin, zinc and doxycyline in August 2020, but was ignored by medical authorities. However, at the time inquiries for the treatment were received from 57 Australian GPs, 30 doctors from overseas, 184 members of the public.

TrialSite said the US National Institutes of Health “conveniently hedges its position” on ivermectin but does acknowledge the off-label use scenario. “For that, they are to be commended,” TrialSite staff stated.

But they also noted high-level efforts to suppress mention of the drug on media including social media, when their documentary about ivermectin use in Peru was taken down by YouTube. They further discovered that Google was hand-selecting videos involving ivermectin for de-emphasis and hence less or no advertising remuneration, while Facebook had identified any news coverage of ivermectin as “misinformation”.

“For example, when TrialSite reported on Slovakia’s health authority approving off label use of the ivermectin for COVID-19 as a fact, which it is, Facebook punished those that posted that news link. Now, they claim that the news item was misleading, but it isn’t at all—it was and is fact,” TrialSite reported.

“This means that there is a significant misinformation agenda now underway, led by social media companies but reinforced by the interests of at least some pharmaceutical companies and kindred spirit in the regulatory bodies.”

Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquin supplies

Those readers wishing to obtain these ‘Covid’ cures and preventatives should first seek medical advice: (a waste of time in Australia)
Vitamin D from a US dietician who

 recommends 50,000 IU vitamin D at the first sign of illness for at least 3 days,  then taper down once symptoms begin to improve.

Also, here is a resource for obtaining Ivermectin or HCQ worldwide:

https://www.exstnc.com/

And in the U.S.

https://www.doctorsdontfearcovid.com/

https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/how-do-i-get-covid-19-medication/

-contributed

Sources of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin

Cairns News has had a few requests to source suppliers of the Covid preventatives hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. If any readers know where to get supplies of these excellent and tested remedies for Covid please tell us at  cairnsnews@protonmail.com

The hydroxychloroquine can be used to prevent malaria and ivermectin is effective in parasite eradication in humans and animals which is why we want it.

GENOCIDE of aged care home residents  

by staff writers   

Relatives of the many hundreds of aged care home residents who have died across Australia with Coronavirus comorbidities or the small number from it should launch a criminal class action against each state’s chief health officer and their federal counterparts for not administering the inexpensive, proven Covid preventatives, hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin.

https://cairnsnews.org/2020/08/11/withholding-medicines-during-a-pandemic-is-criminal-genocidal-behaviour/

Every state Premier and Health Minister should be joined in the action as a co-perpetrator of genocide.

Based on the best medical advice available, billionaire Gold Coast businessman Clive Palmer purchased 33 million doses of hydroxychloroquine costing approximately 40 cents each in April and donated the Covid cure to the National Medical stockpile.

Queensland’s Chief Health Officer Dr Jeanette Young in under police protection but is firmly in the death grip of the medical mafia forcing her to regulate against the use of hydroxychloroquine, a cheap and effective, proven Covid cure

Indicating the extent of the medical mafia’s deadly grip on governments, the unintelligent and compromised Queensland Labor Party Government regulated hydroxychloroquine to prevent doctors from prescribing the life-saving drug which has almost no known side effects unlike toxic vaccines being developed.

Serious medical complications have been slowing human testing of a Coronavirus vaccine throughout the world leaving human guinea pigs physically injured or dead.

How medical researchers believe they can manufacture a vaccine to prevent broad spectrum Coronaviruses which are unable to be isolated in laboratory testing beggars belief.

It simply demonstrates the Big Pharma medical mafia’s financial stranglehold on the World Health Organisation (incidentally whose CEO is an avowed communist terrorist), and governments worldwide.

Trump has defunded the WHO and soon the UN but compromised Australian politicians sail on blithely uncaring about the irreversible psychological and economic damage they are inflicting on a hapless population.

Unfortunately the majority of Aussies for two generations have been dumbed-down by the medical mafia’s fluoridation of much of the populace combined with zombifying television, mobile phones and Marxist universities.

There is no fight left in subdued Aussies and they don’t even know they have been stupefied intentionally by the treacherous, subliminal activities of the medical mafia, politicians and the bureaucracy.

Trump loosens stranglehold of Big Pharma

President Trump signed an executive order Sunday to lower the cost of prescription drugs, he revealed on Twitter.

Trump announced that the aim of the order is to reduce prices to give America “the same low price Big Pharma gives to other countries.”

“Just signed a new Executive Order to LOWER DRUG PRICES! My Most Favored Nation order will ensure that our Country gets the same low price Big Pharma gives to other countries,” the president tweeted. “The days of global freeriding at America’s expense are over…”

“…and prices are coming down FAST! Also just ended all rebates to middlemen, further reducing prices,” he added in a follow-up tweet.

The Trump administration has regularly placed drug costs at the heart of its health policy, with the president already signing a series of four orders in July to lower drug prices.

Withholding medicines during a pandemic is criminal, genocidal behaviour

Sydney gastroenterologist Prof. Borody (above) and Prof. Harvey Risch of Harvard (below) both support deployment of therapeutic drugs to treat COVID-19.

By Editor, Cairns News
WILL Scott Morrison’s vaccine-pushing super bureaucrat Jane Halton of the COVID-19 Coordination Commission be furiously pulling strings for her real boss Bill Gates to stop the latest very effective and safe COVID-19 treatment – Ivermectin?

Worldwide, Trump haters and scamdemic perpetrators have been putting up blocks and cooking up dodgy studies to stop therapeutics like hydroxychloroquine being used instead of the grotesque DNA-meddling vaccine they want us all to submit to.

Halton is a key player in the so-called “global health” network that has been working on a “pandemic responses” since at least 2010 when the Rockefeller Foundation published a major report floating scenarios to drive its globalisation efforts. Last year Halton was prominent at Event 201, the last of the game-planning events before the predicted pandemic.

And yes, you heard it right. Ivermectin, the popular parasite dose for livestock, is a “sure-fire COVID-19 killer” – at least the human version of it. So says Sydney gastroenterologist and professor, Thomas Borody, speaking to Chris Kenny on SkyTV. The professor called on the governments to ramp up and mobilise the anti-parasitical drug for treatment of nursing home patients and others in Melbourne.

And why wouldn’t any decent specialist in medical science – or any decent doctor for that matter – do such a thing when the need is so obvious.

Reasonable, thinking people would know that withholding readily available medicines from sick people is a crime against humanity – genocide even on a large scale. Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Premier “Dictator Dan” Andrews of Victoria can be rightfully accused of this crime unless they act right now to make common medicines available to treat COVID-19 patients across Australia.

The PM and the premier and/or their advisers and Ms Halton and others on the PM’s COVID-19 Coordination Commission should be asking themselves why any government – unless it were some sort of dictatorship exacting revenge on some group of people – actively restrict a medicine to treat a disease among its own constituents and allow them to die?

Oh, that’s right, we momentarily forgot, the state of Victoria is currently a dictatorship, a police state that has placed its people under house arrest. Victorians are all guilty, apparently, of being potential “spreaders” of the deadly COVID-19. But don’t talk about treatments.

That aside, restricting a medicine to a suffering sector of elderly Australians in nursing homes is exactly what has happened as hydroxychloroquine, a widely used treatment for COVID-19, has been severely restricted by the Australian TGA and the health departments of both Victoria and Queensland, where a $13,000 fine is imposed for unauthorized prescribing of HCQ.

Let’s underline the gravity and scandal of this situation. Hundreds of people are infected and sick with COVID-19 across Australia and both state and federal governments are withholding at least one widely used and readily available medicine that can treat it and reduce death rates.

The other medicine is Budesonide, the common, generic steroidal inhalant used to treat asthma. It was used recently by a Texas doctor Richard Bartlett to cure a dozen patients of COVID symptoms. The doctor has called it a “silver bullet treatment”. The medicine is also used in Asian nations for this purpose and has several studies to back it up as a COVID-19 treatment.

But surely there’s got to be good science behind any move to repurpose these medicines, you might ask? In the case of these three medicines, it’s actually not valid to argue that repurposing them for COVID-19 can only be justified by the “gold standard randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials”, as pointed out by Harvard epidemiology professor Harvey A. Risch, who supports the immediate mobilization of hydroxychloroquine.

Risch has no illusions about the primary reasons for the suppression of HCQ – politics and in particular the fact that President Trump endorsed and took hydroxychloroquine himself. A bunch of Risch’s Harvard colleagues published an open letter distancing themselves from his stand. The mob is always right, apparently.

The case of Ivermectin arose in May this year. NewsMax reported on May 22 that “multiple trials in the United States and abroad indicate a drug already approved by the FDA to treat parasitic infections is showing “astounding” results, and could represent a breakthrough in efforts to vanquishing the SARS-CoV-2 virus at the heart of the global pandemic.

“Doctors have administered the drug ivermectin in several simultaneous trials in several countries sometimes in combination with other common medications. Physicians who participated in the study report that patients’ viral loads began declining almost immediately after they began administering ivermectin, a widely available prescription drug approved to combat parasites, scabies and head lice,” NewsMax reported.

Anyone who has followed the news on these drugs as potential and actual treatments for COVID-19 will know that government health departments and drug approval agencies have obstructed the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) while the media chimed in across the board against it.

Scott Morrison, the premiers and his health ministers could reverse scandal tomorrow by declaring any of these medicines an emergency treatment for pandemic cases. It makes absolute sense, even without large-scale trials because doctors worldwide attest to its effectiveness.

And as pointed out by Los Angeles ER doctor Simone Gold, HCQ is available across the counter in much of Africa, South America, and the Middle East including Iran. Dr Gold’s outspoken campaigning for hydroxychloroquine use resulted in her hospital employer sacking her. Such is the cost of truth in this day and age of corporatist deception.