By Paul Zanetti Cartoonist
*IT KNOWS DISTANCE: At 1.5 meters from someone it drops to the ground but any closer and it will kill you.
*IT CAN COUNT: As long as there are no more than 5 in a room you are safe, any more than that, and it will kill you.
*IT KNOWS WHAT BUILDINGS IT IS IN: If you’re in a Stadium or Bunnings you’re ok, but if you are at a Restaurant or Aged Care it will kill you.
*IT KNOWS IF YOU ARE EATING: If you are eating you can take your mask off in a restaurant, but if you are not eating you better put your mask on because it will kill you.
*IT KNOWS IF YOU ARE STANDING OR SITTING IN A PUB/CLUB: If you are sitting and drinking you will be ok, but if you stand up and drink it will kill you.
*IT KNOWS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TALKING AND SINGING: If you talk you will be ok, but if you sing it will kill you.
*IT KNOWS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INSTRUMENTS: If you play drums you will be safe, but if you play a flute it will kill you.
* IT KNOWS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUBURBS AND LGAs: If you’re in the Eastern suburbs you’re fine to walk without a mask and head down to the beach, but if you’re in the Canterbury Bankstown LGA area, Malaka it will kill you.
* IT KNOWS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHURCH AND PROTESTS: If you protest you will be ok, but if you go to church it will kill you.
*IT KNOWS IF YOU ARE AN ESSENTIAL WORKER OR NOT: If you’re an Essential Worker you can go to work and be safe even though you deal with multiple different people everyday, but if you are not an Essential Worker, say an Office Worker and you work inside with the same people everyday, you’d better work from home or it will kill you.
*IT KNOWS IF YOU’RE 6KMS AWAY FROM YOUR HOUSE: If you’re under 5kms from you’re house you’re fine, carry on and exercise, only for 1 hour, but if you’re 6kms from your house and 1 hour and 1 minute outside it will kill you.
“HOWEVER I STILL CANNOT UNDERSTAND HOW IT HAS TOLD PEOPLE TO HOARD TOILET PAPER”..!!!
NSW Health Laboratories have performed 3.4 million tests and private providers have carried out 5.2 million tests up to July 25, running up a Medicare bill of $587 million.
Laboratories have performed 2.2 million COVID-19 tests since the Sydney outbreak began several weeks ago and more than 8.6 million tests since the pandemic started last year. Private pathology companies receive a Medicare subsidy of $85 per test and public laboratories receive a benefit of $42.50.
Australian Clinical Labs is Australia’s third largest private pathology network and expects $621 million revenue by December 31st
Australian government spent over $19 million on imported testing kits to identify COVID-19 antibodies that the government conceded are of “limited use”.
Taking the lead from Government Public Service as Australia’s top growth industry, pathology, swimming in taxpayer money, is riding this panic-pandemic agenda for all it is worth.
This recorded conversation inquiry to a pathology laboratory paints a picture of lies and deceit portrayed yet again by the spin doctors in power. There are no records available differentiating covid-19 from DELTA, so how is NSW puppet master Gladys quoting delta figures of mayhem engulfing NSW when they do not exist?
You may always confirm when politician’s are lying, their lips are moving.
Do you feel being subservient to this political control is Australian?
At what point will you feel enough is enough?
Kick out the fascists of the Liberal and Labor Parties for promulgating a false Covid pandemic
The Commonwealth Constitution of Australia states categorically that Political Party ‘Governments’ cannot force compulsory vaccination upon the public. This section cannot be altered and any penalties such as banning kids from school or a loss of social security payments to parents are unlawful.
Any amendment to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 MUST be voted on in a referendum before the Constitution can be changed.
State legislation is always subordinate to a Constitutional Act. All state legislation imposing covid restrictions are NULL and VOID. We, the people of the Commonwealth of Australia, can lawfully refuse to obey any state legislation that is against the constitution.
In 1946 Australians voted in a referendum that asked if they would authorise the so-called political party governments to force anyone to undergo a medical or dental procedure without their consent.
Here is what the referendum asked, and the voting result:
Referendum 1946 CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (SOCIAL SERVICES) 1946
Do you approve of the proposed law for the Alteration of the Constitution, entitled Constitution Alteration (Social Services) 1946?
THE FIRST QUESTION
CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (SOCIAL SERVICES) 1946 SOCIAL SERVICES
New paragraph to be added to section 51 of the Constitution:
(xxiiiA) the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances;
Q1. The referendum was carried.
All six States recorded a YES vote. Nationally 54.39% of electors voted YES
The question was approved, but with a condition:
medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription)
This means that the People of the Commonwealth of Australia denied the government any power to force people to undergo any medical or dental procedure without their consent.
You do not have to consent!
Download and print out the PDF and carry it around with you at all times. If you are stopped by the police or the covid cops show them this document and explain to them politely that they are also men / women of the Commonwealth of Australia with one vote each. They do not have any authority to break the law.
Forcing people to wear a mask, or undertake any test (including for covid or RBT) is a crime under the Crimes Act 1914, as codified in our Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 S. 51 (xxiiiA)
Inform them that if they continue to demand that you submit to their unlawful orders you will citizens arrest them and summon them to appear before a Common Law Court.
If they continue to demand that you submit to their demands, utter the words:
I hereby arrest you under my common law power to citizens arrest anyone I observe committing a crime. By insisting that I submit to your demands you are committing an indictable crime against me. You are hereby required to supply your name, badge number and police station you are working from.
Make sure you get as much information from them and inform them that they will be required to appear before a Common Law Court when they receive the summons, and that if convicted by a jury of 12 of their peers they will be held personally responsible for any harm they have caused.
Then upload your complaint here and we will advise you on how to take these criminals, liars, thieves and traitors to a real court before 12 of their peers sitting on a properly constitution jury.
Click here to download the PDF, print it out and carry it with you everywhere. If you are challenged by the police be polite, ask them if they are aware that they are the ones committing a crime, and hand them this document….
By Avi Yemini|January 10, 2021
It was perfectly legal during Sydney’s first lockdown. But because Renee was carrying a sign objecting to the restrictions, she was swarmed by police.
She was doing nothing wrong. She wasn’t at a demonstration. She wasn’t at a rally.
She was literally just out for some exercise with her child.
And then police ripped her child out of her arms, and smashed her into the back of a police van.
Listening to her son scream and cry will haunt you:
The Chinese-modeled ultimate surveillance state is coming. Australia began its program 18 months ago
by Jon Rappoport
January 6, 2021
(To join our email list, click here.)
The China lockdown of 50 million citizens overnight was a key element in the long-standing plan to foist a fake pandemic on humanity.
That lockdown provided the model for the rest of the world.
We are now in phase one of Lockdown Civilization.
The “scientific” rationale? THE VIRUS. The virus that isn’t there. The virus whose existence is unproven.
But the story line works: “We have to follow the China model because the pandemic is sweeping across the globe…”
Close on the heels of this con job, we have the intro to phase two: “In order to deal with future pandemics, we must install a new planetary system of command and control; human behavior must be modified.”
Translation: wall to wall surveillance at a level never achieved before; universal guaranteed income for every human, tied to obedience to all state directives; violate those directives and income is reduced or canceled; the planting of nano devices inside the body which will broadcast physiological changes to central command, and which will receive instructions that modify mood and reaction…
Phase one lockdowns prepare the citizenry to accept phase two.
In other words, phase one had nothing to do with a virus. It was part of the technocratic revolution.
I call your attention to a stunning article in The Atlantic. “The Panopticon Is Already Here” (9/20), by Ross Andersen.
Here are significant excerpts:
“Artificial intelligence has applications in nearly every human domain, from the instant translation of spoken language to early viral-outbreak detection. But Xi [Xi Jinping, president of China] also wants to use AI’s awesome analytical powers to push China to the cutting edge of surveillance. He wants to build an all-seeing digital system of social control, patrolled by precog algorithms that identify potential dissenters in real time.”
“China already has hundreds of millions of surveillance cameras in place. Xi’s government hopes to soon achieve full video coverage of key public areas. Much of the footage collected by China’s cameras is parsed by algorithms for security threats of one kind or another. In the near future, every person who enters a public space could be identified, instantly, by AI matching them to an ocean of personal data, including their every text communication, and their body’s one-of-a-kind protein-construction schema. In time, algorithms will be able to string together data points from a broad range of sources—travel records, friends and associates, reading habits, purchases—to predict political resistance before it happens. China’s government could soon achieve an unprecedented political stranglehold on more than 1 billion people.”
“China is already developing powerful new surveillance tools, and exporting them to dozens of the world’s actual and would-be autocracies. Over the next few years, those technologies will be refined and integrated into all-encompassing surveillance systems that dictators can plug and play.”
“China’s government could harvest footage from equivalent Chinese products. They could tap the cameras attached to ride-share cars, or the self-driving vehicles that may soon replace them: Automated vehicles will be covered in a whole host of sensors, including some that will take in information much richer than 2-D video. Data from a massive fleet of them could be stitched together, and supplemented by other City Brain streams, to produce a 3-D model of the city that’s updated second by second. Each refresh could log every human’s location within the model. Such a system would make unidentified faces a priority, perhaps by sending drone swarms to secure a positive ID.”
What if it’s your mother or father?
by Jon Rappoport – December 16, 2020
CNN has the story. And it’s quite a story: “Why vaccinate our most frail? Odd vote out shows the dilemma”, December 4. 
- “The vote to recommend long-term care residents be among the first to receive Covid-19 vaccinations was not unanimous.”
- “Out of a panel of 14 CDC vaccine advisers, a lone doctor said no.”
- “’Odd woman out, I guess,’ Dr. Helen ‘Keipp’ Talbot, of Vanderbilt University, told her colleagues. ‘I still struggle with this. This was not an easy vote’.”
- “Talbot was worried about whether the vaccine would even work in such frail, vulnerable patients. Even more, she worried about how it might look if the vaccine failed in that group, or how it would affect public perception if residents died soon after getting the vaccine.”
- “The Covid-19 vaccines have not been tested in the frail elderly, many of whom are residents of long-term care facilities.”
Let’s stop here for a moment. First, we learn that the clinical trials of the COVID vaccine have not used the frail and elderly as volunteers. Therefore, there is NO evidence that the vaccine is safe or effective in that very large group. If this doesn’t give the frail and elderly and their families pause for thought, nothing will.
Second, Dr. Talbot is worried about “public perception,” when the elderly die right after getting the vaccination.
Well, what would YOU think if your mother died the day after she received the COVID shot?
The CNN article gets worse. Read on. Next up is a comment from Dr. Kelly Moore, “associate director of the Immunization Action Coalition, which is supporting frontline workers who will administer Covid-19 vaccinations.”
“’Since they [the COVID vaccines] haven’t been studied in people in those [elderly] populations, we don’t know how well the vaccine will work for them. We know that most vaccines don’t work nearly as well in a frail elderly person as they would in someone who is fit and vigorous, even if they happen to be the same age,’ Moore said.”
Again—zero evidence the COVID vaccines work in elderly and frail populations. Most vaccines don’t “work nearly as well.”
CNN: “When shots begin to go into arms of [nursing home and long-term care facility] residents, Moore said Americans need to understand that deaths may occur that won’t necessarily have anything to do with the vaccine.”
“We would not at all be surprised to see, coincidentally, vaccination happening and then having someone pass away a short time after they receive a vaccine, not because it has anything to do with the vaccination but just because that’s the place where people at the end of their lives reside,’ Moore said.”
“’One of the things we want to make sure people understand is that they should not be unnecessarily alarmed if there are reports, once we start vaccinating, of someone or multiple people dying within a day or two of their vaccination who are residents of a long-term care facility. That would be something we would expect, as a normal occurrence, because people die frequently in nursing homes’.”
Right. Don’t be alarmed.
Don’t worry if people who are doing reasonably well suddenly die right after getting the COVID shot. It’s just a coincidence.
Their long-term health conditions just happened to kick in a day or two after vaccination. Nothing to wonder about.
Don’t kick up a fuss if it’s YOUR father or mother who died. Stay calm. You can be sure the doctors will let you know if your mother died from the vaccine. Of course they will.
Even though the vaccine has never been tested on the elderly and frail, the doctors know whether a death occurred from the vaccination or from other causes. And they’ll tell the truth. They always do.
The doctors quoted in this CNN article are obviously worried about people dying as a result of the vaccine. They know it’s going to happen. They’re thinking out loud about what they can do to stem the tide of public outrage—particularly from the families of those who die.
The best idea they can come up with is: “these people die anyway.”
I remind readers that, for months, I’ve been reporting on the huge percentage of all so-called COVID deaths that have been occurring among the elderly in nursing homes, in long-term care facilities, in hospitals, in their homes. 
These people were already suffering from multiple long-term serious health conditions. On top of that, they had been treated for years with an array of toxic medical drugs.
And then, they’re absolutely terrified when they receive a diagnosis of COVID. Then they’re isolated, cut off from family and friends.
And they give up and die.
NO VIRUS IS REQUIRED TO EXPLAIN THESE DEATHS.
This is forced premature killing of old people. It’s murder by COVID diagnosis and isolation. 
And now, these people will receive an experimental RNA vaccine, whose effects include auto-immune reactions; the body basically attacks itself. 
- And doctors advising the CDC are telling us not to be alarmed.
- The deaths are just routine.
- Lots and lots of doctors who know what’s going on are thinking, “What if all this comes back on ME?”
- Well, it IS coming back on you, Doctors.
- You’re killers in white coats who are supposed to be saving lives.
2 Doctors, including Former Pfizer top Executive, Issues Stay Motion to EU Medicine Agency Warning “Vaccines Could Cause Permanent Infertility”
Former Pfizer head of respiratory research, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and the former head of the public health department, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, have filed a petition for a stay of action asking the European Medicine Agency to suspend phase III of the clinical trials for Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and all other clinical trials. They site “significant” safety concerns and request all trials are halted until specific criteria outlined in their stay action is met which will ensure efficiency and safety. You can see my original article with links to the full stay motion at https://sarahwestall.com/2-former-pfizer-top-executives-issue-stay-motion-to-eu-medicine-agency-warning-vaccines-could-cause-permanent-infertility/
By EDITOR, Cairns News
MELBOURNE layer Serene Teffaha has taken NSW police COVID whistleblowers on board with her national class action over human rights abuses under the COVID-19 government responses, particularly Victoria’s Dan Andrews Labor government.
Serene’s Advocate Me Lawyers firm in Melbourne is representing Senior Constable Alexander Cooney and Senior Constable Kevin Dawson, who recently blew the whistle on police being forced to violate human rights as part of COVID regulations enforcement. The police also published a lengthy article debunking the many myths around the COVID-19 narrative being used by governments.
“The aim is to get traction with the NSW Police Commissioner and soon other commissioners across the states and territories as more brave whistleblowers come forward,” Teffaha told Cairns News.
“As a Victorian, I thought that the first officers that will come forward are from Victoria but the reality is that I have NSW officers to be more outspoken and fearless. I can’t even tell you how nervous I am for them and what is to come.
“But I believe this to be a chain reaction. We have many more officers who have come forward and I am working on helping them find their voice. We need to work with our boys and girls in the army and police.
“They are the hands of those that wish to destroy our freedoms. They need to understand how they are being used. Please get behind #copsforcovidtruth and sign up to learn about all the other actions we are taking and the other whistleblowers from the medical industry we are representing.
“It is a lot of work and I am a bit overwhelmed but your support and sign up will create a big difference and keep you in the loop. To all the people who are supporting – thank you. And to all those who want to create doubt and target others, I wish you healing and awakening.”
Serene Teffaha’s website is http://www.advocateme.com.au where all of the AdvocateMe projects are. “We will not stop!” said Serene.
By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
A LETTER written by a senior constable from the Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol in NSW and signed by colleagues, has exposed the COVID-19 narrative for its deception and the harm it is causing to police and their relations with the public.
The letter, dated October 26, is addressed to NSW Commissioner of Police Michael Fuller and is one of the best rebuttals of the COVID narrative of fear and control written anywhere, noting false predictions of its severity, false and misleading statistics, flaws in testing and serious questions around the virus itself.
The letter makes the very strong point that in the same way they cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device on motorists, the same must be demanded of the RT PCR test and as such, “police should not in any way” mandate testing for COVID-19, or rely on the results.
For police to raise this within their own ranks may be portrayed as controversial but the action is consistent with common law enforcement, e.g. investigating, exposing and prosecuting a crime of deception carried out against the public.
The letter signatories are urging fellow police officers across the country to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or to sign their form at this link. https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth
The letter reads:
RE: Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions
We are writing to you to raise concerns we have about the use of the police to enforce the ongoing restrictions placed upon our citizens relating to COVID-19, which has seriously eroded community trust in our great police force. Since the Attorney General Declared a State of Emergency for the novel coronavirus, our governments have acted upon certain powers to impose restrictions on its citizens, using the police to enforce their rules. Due to the novel nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, most people concurred that certain restrictions should be followed, until more was learnt about the virus.
With the initial modelling from the Imperial College in the UK  and the Peter Doherty Institute here in Australia, indicating a catastrophic number of cases that would severely burden our hospital system and could result in up to 150,000 Australian deaths , it is easy to comprehend why our governments would respond as they did and why the vast population would comply.
With these frightening projections it became evident that we needed to find a way to quickly diagnose the disease. Yet the Centre for Disease Control in the US states that “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available”.  So even without the virus being isolated, the RT PCR test was picked to become the gold standard for testing.
The game is up as medical experts discuss evidence on a massive scale. Medical practitioners around Europe are reporting COViD-19 as an ordinary flu but is being sold to support the N.W.O agenda of total people control.
Letter to the Editor
Coronaviruses vaccine pointless
Vaccines as far as ‘corona’ cold and flu prevention is concerned appear then to be pointless
Is it simply just a money making scam for big pharma, or is there another agenda?
Freemason Scomo lives in “The Lodge”. Does he take his orders from the “Grand Master”?
“Antibody levels in the blood of coronavirus patients drop quickly after the body clears the virus, according to a new study published in mBio, an open access journal of the American Society for Microbiology.
For convalescent plasma to help patients who currently have COVID-19, the donated blood needs to be collected soon after recovery. Under current guidelines, however, patients can’t donate blood until 14 days after symptoms have resolved, and most donations occur even later.
“We don’t want to transfuse the virus, just transfuse the antibodies. But at the same time, our work shows that the capacity of the plasma to neutralize viral particles is going down during those first weeks,” Andres Finzi, PhD, one of the study authors and a microbiologist at the University of Montreal in Canada, said in a statement.
The research team analyzed blood samples from 31 people recovering from COVID-19 and measured antibodies at 1-month intervals. Overall, the immunoglobulins that neutralize the virus dropped about 6 to 10 weeks after symptoms began. The ability of the antibodies to neutralize the virus also fell during that time.
In previous studies, researchers found that antibodies peak around 2 to 3 weeks after symptoms begin and fall after that. Finzi and his colleagues have also found that the ability to neutralize the virus decreases after that — about 3 to 6 weeks after symptoms begin.
Antibodies block the “spike” protein on SARS-CoV-2 that allows the virus to invade a cell in the body. They neutralize the coronavirus by preventing it from locking into a host’s cells and replicating.
Scientists aren’t sure whether the neutralizing function drives the efficacy of convalescent plasma use in COVID-19 patients, Finzi and the research team wrote. If so, recovered patients should be allowed to donate as soon as possible, they said.
“Efforts should be made to ensure that convalescent plasma is collected as soon as possible after recovery of the donor from active infection,” they wrote.
from Kev Crisscross