uno1 itJSluponinumsoly amtr 18eScSse:20ad · Any law that purports to make it mandatory for a person to submit to a COVID-19 vaccination is invalid.
In 1945, the then Chief Justice Latham held that quarantine laws “may be regarded in most, if not all, of its aspects as a form of public health legislation”.
The Commonwealth has the power under section 51(ix) of the Constitution to make laws with respect to ‘quarantine’. This is a power granted to the Commonwealth. Not the States.
At  of the decision, Latham CJ held that the Commonwealth “could not pass a law requiring citizens of the States… to submit to vaccination or immunization”.
So there are several important things that flow from this High Court decision.
1. Vaccinations and immunizations are matters that fall within the category of ‘quarantine’.
2. Only the Commonwealth has the power to make laws with respect to ‘quarantine’ under section 51(ix) of the Constitution.
3. The Commonwealth is prohibited from passing laws requiring citizens to submit to vaccination or immunization (which are quarantine matters).
4. The States have no power to make laws with respect to quarantine, including matters dealing with vaccinations and immunizations (as Latham CJ held that these things are ‘quarantine’ matters).
5. The States are unable to do something that the Commonwealth is prohibited from doing under the exercise of the quarantine power.
6. Therefore the States cannot pass any law that requires citizens to submit to vaccination or immunization.
7. Part 3B of the Public Health (COVID-19 Air Transportation Quarantine) Order (No 2) (NSW) 2021 is invalid.
All workers who have been identified under the ‘NSW Airport and Quarantine Workers’ Vaccination Program’ should consider the above before making any decision as to whether to have a COVID-19 vaccination
Good advice from the horse’s mouth……
30 years as a police officer, in Australia. gives me some understanding of the law. Under the Criminal Codes in all States of Australia are the offences of Assault and Extortion. Go to the police and lodge a complaint should someone attempt to remove access to things/benefits etc because you won’t have a vaccine or any other medicine. So for example if your workplace tells you that you have to have the vaccine or else, then you will see that it fits the definition of extortion. Assault is an obvious one.
Ultimately if you are the defendant you never really win, that is why you must be the complainant. When dealing with serious offences of Assault and extortion, often these matters on a not guilty basis will end up in front of a jury.
People, learn the definition of assault and also extortion to see if it applies in your case, and I don’t mean some bullcrap bush lawyer belief. There is oodles of real case law that you can find online to better inform yourself. (Believe it or not, even criminal law solicitors can give you reasonably sound advice as to whether your complaint could fulfil the elements required to persue a prosecution.) Once you are better informed then go the police and lodge complaints. Do this in numbers. Multiple complainants ALWAYS require a more thorough investigation and are harder to ‘fogg off’
What you have to do is force the hand of the police to take action. Believe it or not but some times politics interferes with what police want to do(sarcasm). You will find that there are brave police out their willing to help you, but you must step up to the plate and present yourself as a person of integrity. Politely demand that your complaint be dealt with and gently force the issue. Police when they charge someone are taking all risk on themselves as they wear the risk of personal liability if it goes belly up, so if you want police to take action on your behalf, present your self as a reliable creditable standup person, not some raving buffoon.
The secret is in reasonably knowing what your talking about and then presenting yourself in numbers.
from a decent police officer
by Mike Adams, Natural News
Highly-placed sources close to the Trump administration have given us a download on important information. Mostly notably, Trump is NOT surrendering to Big Pharma and the vaccine industry. He’s actually fighting them and has made great strides toward exposing the crimes of Fauci and the W.H.O.
I’ve posted a critical video update and article about Trump, Big Pharma, the vaccine industry and what I’ve now learned about Trump’s ongoing battle with Big Pharma and the deep state swamp.
Australian nurses and midwives who dare to speak out against the dangers of vaccinations, regarding deadly mercury contents, faetal tissue and other harmful ingrediants, on social media or in person will be prosecuted, the Australian government has warned, urging members of the public to report vaccine skeptics to the authorities.
Medical professional face a jail sentence of 10 years for expressing doubt about the effectiveness of vaccinations or urging further studies into vaccine safety. Opponents of the new law claim free speech and scientific integrity is under attack in Australia by a government that has been bought and paid for by Big Pharma.
“With no exceptions we expect all registered nurses, enrolled nurses and midwives to use the best available evidence in making practice decisions. This includes providing information to the public about public health issues,” Chair of the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA) Dr. Lynette Cusack said in a statement.
The NMBA has called on Australians to report nurses or midwives promoting anti-vaccination – ‘anti-vaxxers’, as they’re known colloquially.
“The board will consider whether the nurse or midwife has breached their professional obligations and will treat these matters seriously,” the statement said.
“Any published anti-vaccination material and/or advice which is false, misleading or deceptive which is being distributed by a registered nurse, enrolled nurse or midwife (including via social media) may also constitute a summary offence under the National Law and could result in prosecution by AHPRA [Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency.
Robert J Kennedy jr stated in his meeting with Donald Trump:
“What you have to understand is that the vaccine regimen changed dramatically around 1989. The reason it changed, Tucker, is that Congress, drowning in pharmaceutical industry money, did something they have never done for any other industry – they gave blanket legal immunity to all the vaccine companies.
“So that no matter how sloppy the line protocols, no matter how absent the quality control, no matter how toxic the ingredients, or egregious the injury to your child, you cannot sue them.
“So there’s no depositions, there’s no discovery, there’s no class action suits. All of a sudden vaccines became enormously profitable.”
“It became a gold rush for the pharmaceutical industry to add new vaccines to the spectrum.”
Watch the video
“Brain dead Sheep?”
One of the strongest supporters of vaccination, Victoria’s Health Minister Jill Hennessy, has no time for parents who believe vaccine safety requires further study in order to ensure they are safe for our children.
Describing vaccine skeptics as “brain dead sheep“, the politician said:
“They are an organized movement, largely stemming from the United State of America that are hell bent on misleading parents that vaccinations are unsafe.
“That’s a dangerous message and one I’m going to continue to fight. Vaccinations save lives,” the minister concluded.
“This statement confirms poor Jill knows nothing and understand less.”
According to the new laws, parents who don’t immunize their kids may stop receiving childcare benefits. Only people with solid medical reasons are exempt from the crackdown.