Airport,quarantine and aged care workers cannot lawfully be forced into taking a deadly Covid shot

G&B Lawyers

uno1 itJSluponinumsoly amtr 18eScSse:20ad  · Any law that purports to make it mandatory for a person to submit to a COVID-19 vaccination is invalid.
In 1945, the then Chief Justice Latham held that quarantine laws “may be regarded in most, if not all, of its aspects as a form of public health legislation”.
The Commonwealth has the power under section 51(ix) of the Constitution to make laws with respect to ‘quarantine’. This is a power granted to the Commonwealth. Not the States.
At [257] of the decision, Latham CJ held that the Commonwealth “could not pass a law requiring citizens of the States… to submit to vaccination or immunization”.
So there are several important things that flow from this High Court decision.
1. Vaccinations and immunizations are matters that fall within the category of ‘quarantine’.
2. Only the Commonwealth has the power to make laws with respect to ‘quarantine’ under section 51(ix) of the Constitution.
3. The Commonwealth is prohibited from passing laws requiring citizens to submit to vaccination or immunization (which are quarantine matters).
4. The States have no power to make laws with respect to quarantine, including matters dealing with vaccinations and immunizations (as Latham CJ held that these things are ‘quarantine’ matters).
5. The States are unable to do something that the Commonwealth is prohibited from doing under the exercise of the quarantine power.
6. Therefore the States cannot pass any law that requires citizens to submit to vaccination or immunization.
7. Part 3B of the Public Health (COVID-19 Air Transportation Quarantine) Order (No 2) (NSW) 2021 is invalid.

All workers who have been identified under the ‘NSW Airport and Quarantine Workers’ Vaccination Program’ should consider the above before making any decision as to whether to have a COVID-19 vaccination

About Editor, cairnsnews

One of the few patriots left who understands the system and how it has been totally subverted under every citizen's nose. If we can help to turn it around we will, otherwise our children will have nothing. Our investigations show there is no 'government' of the people for the people of Australia. The removal of the Crown from Australian Parliaments, followed by the incorporation of Parliaments aided by the Australia Act 1987 has left us with corporate government with policies not laws, that apply only to members of political parties and the public service. There is no law, other than the Common Law. This fact will be borne out in the near future as numerous legal challenges in place now, come to a head soon.

Posted on July 5, 2021, in coronavirus, Covid Cops, Covid passport, Covid vaccines, Covid-19 and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 15 Comments.

  1. “At [257] of the decision, Latham CJ held that the Commonwealth “could not pass a law requiring citizens of the States… to submit to vaccination or immunization”.

    That wasn’t a holding. The comment was obiter dictum, hence not part of the judgment. It has no legal weight.


  2. crisscross767



  3. Hay everyone remember this is Oz the land that there are NO Laws.UNLESS you take people/Govs to Court.
    BUT thats ONLY FOR THE RICH…we are STILL in CHAINS.Nothing has changed.


  4. the cartoon is interesting and certainly has that vintage look and sound however the word weaponise was not invented till around 1957.
    also the nuremberg code is not a code that countries have adopted but is a set of guidelines countries should adopt.


  5. troppoinnorth, no the immunity will NOT stand up and the injured (and likely governments) will go them. The reason for this is that legal immunities fall over if there was recklessness, negligence and fraud which is very clearly the case with these “vaccines”


  6. old Kodger, yes I have just looked at it – it is very clear as you say


  7. Peterbro, good comments. I think insurance companies have a major headache on their hands already and may have trouble funding all the business interruption claims that have started pouring in – they had not prepared for that and amended policies as hard as it is to believe. Anyhow, back to your comment, yes I think the cost fall onto the back of the actual employer and bankrupt them. Just another bonus from the scamdemic…is this planet earth???


  8. Peterbro,


  9. Now we are getting to the meat of the matter.

    If a workplace insists on the staff getting the ‘experimental medical procedure’ jab, then doesn’t that mean that any adverse reactions becomes a workplace incident?

    So does the business have workplace insurance to cover such an incident from a medical experiment?

    I bet it doesn’t ‘cos insurance companies deal in fact and statistics, and no way would they cover something that would send them broke.
    To have that coverage the premiums would be astronomically high and businesses could not afford it.

    For those in the situation of working for businesses that insist that they get the jab, ask to see proof of their insurance coverage of such an incidence.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. troppoinnorth

    regardless whether we can be compelled to be vaccinated or not it must be understood that these vaccines are only being used in an emergency capacity and have not completed a full test period . people are dying as a result of being injected with this unproven substance and manufacturers are given indemnity .


  11. Karen, yes, that is a form of coercion given that families NEED this money just to get by. It is so so wrong. That was Morrison’s doing by the way in a previous ministry


  12. Bryanne,
    I have exactly the same reservations, however, the Nuremberg Code is very specific, ANYTHING other than informed consent is a WAR CRIME!

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Thank you for the article. However I am confused by it. It says the Commonwealth can make laws regarding Quarantine (under which vaccines fall) but then it says:

    “The Commonwealth is prohibited from passing laws requiring citizens to submit to vaccination or immunization (which are quarantine matters)”

    Could some clarification be given please



  14. karen elliot

    I assume Australia is a signatory to the Nuremberg Code, and the Code is consistent with above legal advice ?
    That Australian Government cant compel vaccinations would explain why supporting parents are threatened with loss of Government payments if they dont submit their kids to being “vaxxed” ?

    Liked by 1 person

  15. crisscross767

    You’ve just gotta watch this!!!

    Vintage Early-Warning Pandemic Cartoon – Amazing!

    Jul 4, 2021 | 0 Comments

    Here is a motion cartoon from the earliest days of motion-pictures that likely was made at the time of the 1918 Spanish-Flu epidemic. So far, we have been unable to verify its origin, but there is no reason to think it is a counterfeit. Its value will be immediately recognized, not in its rarity or as a collector’s item, but its editorial commentary that is stunningly contemporary to our present day. Popular sentiment a hundred-and-twenty years ago clearly was far more aware of an agenda behind the propaganda and, as you will see in the final message of the cartoon, folks knew who was behind it and what the end game was. An amazing time capsule of truth.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: