Senator Malcolm Roberts asked the ACLEI if the new National Anti-Corruption Commission would have oversight of the workings of the Voice if it is established. The response was that the Voice would be purely advisory and not provide services or programmes.

The Commission did not provide a clear answer to the question and this runs parallel with the government position of providing as little as possible detail about the voice prior to the referendum.

Share Everywhere !

Shares

By cairnsnews

From the land of Australians

14 thought on “Will the new Corruption Commission cover the Voice? Probably not!”
  1. The Parliament of Australia is a misrepresentation of the Parliament of the Commonwealth and inhabited by treasonous toads Blisskitt; so any article on that website under that falsehood is a fairy tale, intended to deceive the people.

  2. Joey
    June 10, 2023 at 11:49 am
    They need their ‘so-called’ voice, as it makes it easier for them to takeover our private properties etc, so no surprise that Albo will ensure it gets legislated either way.

    Today Sunday 11 June I watch “OUTSIDER” on Sky to learn that the WA govt passed such legislation

  3. Gerard Brennan, Jesuit Mabo Judge, and son Frank Brennan, activist Jesuit Priest implementing Rome’s policy. Frank published a book 2023 “An Indigenous voice to parliament : Considering a constitutional bridge.” This is where all this evil is planned by the JSFG at 45 Gesu Place, Rome. Unless we recognise where all these things originate, we are wasting out time commenting.
    UCA News July 15, 2015 Francis, a Pope who saves Creation, issued an encyclical [a letter to all Bishops] called Laudato Si. He called on bishops to instill the spirit of care to save all plants and animals from extinction by climate change. There are cries of anguish from our sister, Mother Earth.
    She weeps and implores us to put an end to our abuses and her destruction. Is this not pantheism? Canadian Jesuit Michael Czerny of the Vatican’s ecology office, said that exploration for coal, oil and gas must end immediately and existing production phased out urgently.
    There’s an annual “Laudato Si” get together. In 2022 it was in Tanzania, Africa. Bishops are urged to create “Laudato Si” clubs and organise community involvement. Come on folks, this a great idea, get involved. 200,000 cows are going to be killed in each of Holland and Ireland.
    With any movement like this, look for a Jesuit. There’s Michael Czerny. The Pope himself is a Jesuit. He is presented to the world as a bumbling fool who wouldn’t harm a fly.
    Are the World governments obeying? Yes, like dogs obeying their master. Is it by popular demand? Yes, like sheep. Are they generating popular demand for action? Yes. Did the same happen with Covid? Yes. Now you know where these policies originate.

  4. Parliamentary commissions are mentally incapable of investigating anything. It’s the foxes guarding the chooks.

  5. Joey, “makes it easier for them to takeover our private properties”.
    Correct.
    The Laberals will continue to serve the bidding of their masters – the UN & WEF and any other parasite, as long as it helps them turn a profit. Self-centered politicians will declare their ‘hands are tied’ by UNDRIP principles and it’s only fair to hand back public land to Aboriginal custodians. In time, private land will follow suit.
    Politicians will enjoy the divide and conquer Kabuki Show as they have hidden their assets in trusts. They don’t care. Unfortunately for them, their sleight of hand plan is seen through by a few million people already.
    If they lose, they stand to lose everything.
    Every cloud has a silver lining.

  6. Hi again Ed and co. This is not necessarily related to the “voice” however, I know there are some commentators here that are aware of and have spoken about this on this very site. I have already directly emailed this to Tony Ryan. I stumbled across on the APH website.

    “Myths of entitlement: a history of the Age Pension and the National Welfare Fund

    20 December 2021, Author: Don Arthur, Social Policy

    From the Introduction:

    “For decades an urban myth has circulated that accuses politicians of misappropriating funds meant to be set aside for today’s pensioners. The myth weaves historical fact and misconception into a story designed to reinforce claims the Age Pension is an earned entitlement rather than a ‘welfare’ payment. In one version of the myth, former journalist Brian Hale claimed:

    … most pensioners worked and spent a lifetime paying for their pensions. It’s not welfare and, when it was introduced, it was actually meant to be an entitlement. A 7.5 per cent tithe was taken from wages to put into a fund to pay their pensions. Just as workers now have superannuation collected.[1]

    At the centre of the myth is the National Welfare Fund, a trust account set up by the Curtin Government in 1943 as a conduit for social services spending. The Social Services Contribution was a levy set up by the Chifley Government in 1945 to provide revenue for the National Welfare Fund. Both the National Welfare Fund and the Social Services Contribution were real but neither performed the roles given to them by the myth.

    According to the myth, the National Welfare Fund was set up as a kind of government superannuation fund where workers paid the Social Services Contribution along with their income tax and this money was meant to accumulate in the National Welfare Fund to pay for a non-means tested pension when they retired.[2]”

    Other sections of document include:

    “The stolen pensions myth

    Entitlement to the Age Pension

    Safety net or earned entitlement?

    The debate over contribution

    Proposals to replace the Age Pension

    Coalition proposals

    Figure 1: ‘Chifley the greatest social service illusionist on earth’, Liberal Party advertisement, 15 September 1946

    Labor proposals
    Figure 2: 1947 newspaper headline on Chifley’s superannuation fund proposal

    Removing the means test

    The National Welfare Fund

    The National Welfare Scheme

    The creation of the National Welfare Fund

    How the National Welfare Fund worked

    1944–45 changes

    Creation of unemployment and sickness benefits

    Inclusion of the Age Pension in the National Welfare Fund

    Creation of the Social Services Contribution

    Changes by the Menzies Government

    1950—Merging the Social Services Contribution with income tax

    1952—Changing the way income is credited to the National Welfare Fund
    The birth of the myth

    Changes by the Fraser Government

    Hawke Government abolishes the National Welfare Fund

    Conclusion

    Appendix: Timeline of policy changes relevant to the National Welfare Fund ”

    I have not checked author or references but found it interesting that this needed to be posted on the APH website. Who can verify the facts??

    Please see link here: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp2122/NationalWelfareFund

  7. Hate to say it, folks, but the fix is already in.

    AnAL’s BS “Voice” referendum will be adjudicated by the notorious “Australian Electoral Commission” – you know, the corporate agency that rigs all our elections for our corporate fake “government’s” foreign shareholders.

    … the same “Australian Electoral Commission” that put AnAL himself into the fake PM position.

    It’s not our “government”, folks, it’s a CORPORATE ENTITY owned by FOREIGN BILLIONAIRES. Surely that’s bleedingly obvious, even to the uninitiated, when creepy Bill commands a private audience to dictate Australian policy to his bottom-feeding servant AnAL in Kirribilli house?

    It’s THEIR game, and THEY make all the rules.

  8. They need their ‘so-called’ voice, as it makes it easier for them to takeover our private properties etc, so no surprise that Albo will ensure it gets legislated either way.

  9. I saw a post from Larry Hannigan that says that Albo has said that if the Voice referendum does not get up he will legislate it anyway. Not surprising, as WA and Sa seem to have already done similar. So much for our much-touted, but non-existent, democracy.

  10. Purely advisory. To what extent are the corporate pretenders to the Commonwealth of Australia and its 1901 Constitution let us say ‘constrained’ by larger forces (such as CCP and UN) to be governed by this advisory body?

  11. This good man seems to be the only person working on behalf of Australians , Don”t need the other scum in parliament
    Thank you Malcom Roberts

  12. Purely advisory my a..e, it will dominate most aspects of our lives and it is imperative that the referendum fails and fails resoundingly and both side of the Parliament get off their backsides and really make all of us equal by stopping throwing money at those fair dinkum or pretend aboriginals for no good reason and treat them just as we who pay the bloody taxes are treated.

Leave a Reply

https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v7.0&appId=https://www.facebook.com/groups/cairnsnews

Discover more from cairnsnews.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading