KAP party leader Robbie Katter has said ‘you just can’t ignore more than 40,0000 Queenslanders’, as the parties petition for the Queensland Parliament to support the bill for Castle Law has reached more than 40,000 signatures in five weeks.

Cairns News has correspondence from LNP members who support this bill, but these supporters are worried LNP MP’s will not support it.

Mr Katter said Castle Law, which will allow homeowners to use ‘whatever force that is nessessary to defend themselves from intruders’, would send a clear message to would-be criminals if passed.

“Castle Law is desperately needed to curb the uncontrolled crime in our community, the major parties in Brisbane can’t ignore the Queensland people any longer,” he said.

“KAP is offering true solutions to a problem neglected for too long.”

“If Castle Law was passed, no longer would Queenslanders need to concern themselves about if defending themselves and their family would land them in court, not the intruder.”

Introduced on May 1 the committee report date is set for November 1 and is yet to be scheduled for a public hearing or briefing by the Parliamentary Committee.

The petition was tabled at Parliament on Tuesday, with Deputy Leader Nick Dametto urging the bill’s debate and vote be fast tracked.

“This timeline means the bill will lapse before the committee finalises their report, as the current parliament is set to dissolve ahead of the state election on 26 October,” he said.

“The 57th parliamentary term is not over yet. There is still ample time to bring the dates of the Castle Law bill forward and finalise the report and allow the bill to be debated prior to October because this is clearly what the people of Queensland want.” – Townsville Bulletin

Share Everywhere !

Shares

By cairnsnews

From the land of Australians

14 thought on “KAP Castle Law bill tabled in parliament: Supporting petition signed by 40,000 voters”
  1. Every little bit helps. It is a shocker that Communist subversion in the nation is so advanced, that the Constitution would be so eroded by the legislative and judicial branches of governent that we would need a Castle Law to spell it out that people have the right of self defenseand family defense when their home is invaded – especially by a member of a Protected Minority Racial / Ethnic Group.

    The Education State is much further advanced in this Agenda than the Big Pineapple, but the trend of these crimes is clear. Also clear is the police policy of attempting to sanitise these crimes by refusing to release racial / ethnic stats to the public.
    https://www.noticer.news/victoria-home-invasions-africans-overrpresented/

    This would allow the public to quantify what everyone knows. Blacks and Browns are massively over-represented in these stats with Sudan and South Sudan coming in at the top of the ‘over represented category’ for burglaries with aggravated assaults. I’ll bet there are a lot of home owners and home bodies doing time for those.

    In a nation of laws that respects human and civil rights we should not require a Castle Law. If we require one, then it stands to reason, we are no longer a nation of laws that respects human and civil rights. And especially not the rights of White Australians.

    Welcome to country.

  2. Isn’t protecting yourself in your own home against an armed intruder not a criminal offence in all states? I’m fairly certain that6 a number of innocent People are l anguishing in goals nationwide because hey protected themselves and their family.

  3. So lets go back and see exactly when this huge problem with youth offenders began.. oh yes, I think it was probably after school lock downs.. How many kids fell behind in school, lost their places in Uni or other technical education causing them to drop out. How many of their parents are sick and unable to work because of vax side effects.. and cannot afford to further educate their kids?

    It would be interesting to see the stats when these offences actually starting to ramp up and increase and get out of hand wouldn’t it ? – because I can’t remember it being a problem before the covid lockdowns etc.

    How about we look at the bigger picture here.. and look at what caused it all – the government has much to answer for.

  4. “No one is allowed on your property without your express permission…government included, and you can remove every intruder with whatever force you can use to do so.”

    Precisely, “reasonable” force. They can have whatever law but in the end the courts will decide how they want to slant it.

    Sounds like much ado about not much. Getting arrested and charged and paying legal costs for defending yourself is the real issue!

    Cops can prosecute us and send us to court on even the slimmest evidence(!!!) or personal whim. Merely on the say so of someone.

    In the end it can all be simply dismissed or withdrawn by the cops with no injury to anyone EXCEPT to our lives and thousands of $$$$ out of our pocket.!!

    Small grand jury type panels should vet any prosecutions FOR REASONABLENESS, and individual cop prosecutors such as constables should be kept on a legal leash.

  5. The article quotes Mr. Katter – “… the major parties in Brisbane can’t ignore the Queensland people any longer…”

    Really? Just watch them.

    News Flash, Mr. Katter – you’re playing in a foreign-owned corporation’s sand-pit. Maybe go pass your Castle Law bill past the foreign shareholders to get their opinion of it.

    But maybe don’t be holding your breath. That would be kind of like expecting the boards of Coles and Woolworths to give a rat’s arse about what the farmers think.

  6. Commenter Dennis
    The “death” of QV1 was too close to the date of federation, and too far apart by geography and the speed of shipping, to be sure at all that the federation or anything following was legit. The date was too close and they would fudge the dates to suit their intents. I am very open to the theory that QV1 didn’t sign off on anything, the whole continent may have been usurped by a confederation in 1901.
    I bet Twiggy and Simon Holmes a Court know a lot more about it than the rest of us. Quite likely most of the attorney generals are in on it too, or they would be asking questions. They write a cute constitution to placate us then legally the goings on are quite a different thing. “Our constitution” gets lip service for 124 years but nothing enforceable. A hoax !!! A scam !!! A “clerical error”

  7. Australia has not been offered the chance to accept a new Monarch by referendum as is required by Constitutional Law, since Queen Victoria died.
    So we have gone for almost 124 years without a Monarch, and so no new laws have been signed into force since Federation in 1901.
    It is all just a great deception run by our politicians, bureaucrats and now unlawfully corporatized government.
    You are all being taken for fools, and for your negligence of not revealing this issue, you deserve what has happened.
    Responsible people can create a responsible government, but fools don’t even care.

  8. Wake up Australia, you already have this covered in Constitutional Law, original version, that is…the only lawful version, uncorrupted by politicians and bureaucrats…and it can only be altered by referendum, and most certainly not by some puny State government that cannot create laws outside of Constitutional boundaries.
    No one is allowed on your property without your express permission…government included, and you can remove every intruder with whatever force you can use to do so, and no one can stop you from protecting yourself, your people, and your property.
    But this must be upheld by a lawful Common Law Court.
    Do not appear in an Admiralty Maritime Law Court to fight your battles as these have no jurisdiction on landmasses anywhere. The Bar Association is unlawful, so they will only agree with Admiralty crap.
    You need to represent yourself as a man or woman under God, not a citizen under the satanic system.
    That is how they hold you under their power….it is called deception.

  9. Unlikely that they will allow & pass it, as other states could follow suit, if the people demand it etc.

    Folks need to be disarmed etc, otherwise we could become a threat to the establishment and they unlikely will allow us, to carry out any proper justice, if the need arrives.

    After all, they are not working for us, their highest priority is to protect themselves, including their self interests.

  10. 40,000 Mwa-ha-haa, throw it in the bin with all the others

Leave a Reply

Discover more from cairnsnews.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading