Aboriginal Minister Linda Burney said in Parliament “Under our constitution Australia and Torres Strait Island Australians have had no voice, no say in matters that affected our communities.”
Federal Aboriginal Affairs Minister Linda Burney is so far out of her depth her feet will never touch the bottom
Really: “… have had no voice, no say in matters that affected our communities,” that Linda Burney is baloney — Koolymoot from Kurdaitcha.
There are 11 indigenous MP’s in Canberra, That equals 4.84 percent of the 227 parliamentarians for a group that is only 3.2 percent of the population — other Australians are 96.8%; on that basis they are over represented.
There were 3,273 registered Aboriginal Corporations, making representations to governments delivering health and other services.
National Indigenous Australian Agency (NIAA) has 1,317 employees costing close to 4.5 billion dollars this financial year. They are the commonwealth body responsible for policy development, implementation and service delivery for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples — They are their VOICE.
Over $34 billion a year goes to Indigenous people and communities; aboriginal organizations receive hundreds of millions of dollars from mining royalties every year. More than 230 million dollars in the NT alone. Taxpayer now provide of $39 billion dollars a year on Aboriginal needs, more than is spent on Medicare.
The above appear the irrefutable evidence Linda Burney has misled Parliament and the people of Australia — Aboriginals are over represented, over funded and over heard.
They DO have a BIG VOICE IN LAW AND IN GOVERNMENT — for Linda Burney NOT to know that is ignorance, she should be replaced.
The Indigenous Voice to Parliament activists appears a bunch of hypocrites; like all other people Aboriginals have achieved where they currently are in life purely based on their abilities.
Sincerely
Gil May
Forestdale 4118
Editor: There has been in place the Torres Strait Regional Authority for 20 years which comprises elected members from Island and mainland communities. This body has direct access to the Prime Minister’s department and any other politician it wants to summons. It has immediate access to the political and bureaucratic engine room at the snapping of fingers. The Voice will take away this group’s ability for direct negotiation. They haven’t woken up to this yet.
Different subject but corresponding situation. If this bill passes nobody will be able to comment on The Voice legislation whether before or after the referendum.
During WA’s Land Rights campaign in the 80″s I knew aboriginal crews who used 2,4,5-T herbicide – at the time they all were ignorant as to how toxic it was. They are all dead now and the WA government could not care less. At the time the maximum dioxin content allowed was point one part per million. If the chemical used was leftover’s from Vietnam the dioxin content could have been up to 15 parts per million.
Giving the aboriginals the illusion of power over the whites suits the globalist elite because of their proven tendency to be easily manipulated.I heard aborigines believing that captain Cook sailed up the WA DeGrey river shooting aborigines because some propaganda they were given said so.
The Globalists care bugger all about anyone other than their own kind. Their objective is world power and control by whatever it takes.
Loading...
The approx 3% of the Australian population with their annual budget of 4.5 billion which is: the Aboriginal communities, Aboriginal people and their Box Tickers + the Aboriginal Industry and land council corporates does have a quite an influential voice and representation in government.
It is Linda Burney’s EFFING job as Minister for Aboriginal Affairs to oversea their interests, community voices, social, economic progress and development.
Loading...
Fed Up! said – “Has anyone noticed that former Albo has been replaced by a skinny, younger ‘Where’s wally now” version or is it just me!”
Adrenochrome will do that (it’s what I heard).
After all, AnAL just happens to be creepy Bill’s best little mate in the whole wide world, and what better way to keep unelected inadvertent shitstain AnAL on script?
Loading...
Has anyone noticed that former Albo has been replaced by a skinny, younger ‘Where’s wally now” version or is it just me!
Looking back on older Albo photo’s he looks nothing like he does now…bit like Biden
Obviously No-one wanted to wear the ‘Fat ugly bastard suit”
Loading...
My Letter on The Voice, sent to the main Melbourne newspapers, this morning:
Many commentators on The Voice referendum believe that our aboriginal people will lose their sovereignty if brought into the Constitution, and I believe that this may well be the case.
Australian aborigines represent around 3% of the total population and, if The Voice should get up, this minority will not have willingly surrendered their sovereignty-our aborigines are a collective of disparate clans and tribes each with their own individual tribal sovereignty-but will have had their sovereignty stolen from them by an overwhelming white majority.
Might it be best that these tribal groups are first consulted, a Yes or No outcome determined, and, if a Yes vote succeeds, then the general referendum takes place?
I think any real aboriginal leader would, if genuine, agree to such a preliminary process.
After all, self determination is the right of anyone, black, white, or otherwise.
Loading...
I posted some time ago the definition of indigenous. Indigenous means those born to a country, in simple terms, born in said country. Hence they changed the wording to First Nations, which I am not sure the definition of has exactly been established as previous definitions were based on Australian aboriginals being indigenous.
So I suggest everyone here start identifying as Aboriginal and start ticking the box. I know some here will be saying “sellout”. But it is time to get smart and use the system they introduced against them.
I believe from my research there about 10 parliamentarians identify as “First nations. Most the others cannot claim First Nations Australians, ALBO is just a start, half caste Italian. The list goes on and on.
Loading...
Irene Laird said – “Or if you are 90% White, 10% black can you claim to be the latter…”
Yes, Irene, yes you can.
In fact, you can claim to be “indigenous” and access all the juicy benefits thereby cionferred, even if you happen to be 93.75% white honky, because the legal threshold to be recognised as “indigenous” by all our fake “government” agencies here in Australia is 1/16 (!).
And, of course, who’s going to bother to challenge any such claim anyway? A few snowy white examples spring immediately to mind.
And Irene Laird also said “… just because you want to and anyway there is more money in it?”
Persih the thought that a big fat trough full of that sweet sweet gravy would attract anyone with notions of financial advantage!
And anyway, it’s all perfectly LEGAL, FFS, so who the Hell WOULDN’T shove their snout in that particular trough if they had half a chance – but they don’t just have “half a chance”, they have the full endorsement and encouragement of our entire fake “government” and its labyrinth of BS PC beauracratic structures.
Fun fact – I have some relatives who are half-caste, half fully Irish white bastards and half true-blue Indigenous. Most of them “identify” as INDIGENOUS – they refuse to even acknowledge their 50% CAUCASIAN heritage. But seriously, are we surprised, when EVERYTHING pumped out by our fake “governments” promotes exactly such HATEFUL prejudice (they HATE whitey, even though they are HALF WHITE themselves!) and moreover PAYS THEM to do so?
Notably, ONE of said half-caste realtives – just ONE – has divorced hinself of the entire BS “indigenous” charade, and REFUSED to be drawn into the never-ending “victim” culture and concomitant pork barreling that defines the official Australian Aboriginal narrative.
Needless to say, that ONE individual – someone with a good dose of dignity and self-respect, not to mention self-awareness – is the ONLY person amongst all those half-caste brethren who has successfully prospered without interference or financial support from our fake “governments” and has raised a beautiful happy & healthy family in the mainstream Australian community.
And meanwhile, let’s not forget the parlous state of our fully indigenous communities dotted across the Australian landscape, whom our fake “governments” and their myriad beauracracies frankly don’t really seem to give a rat’s arse about. It’s all about that annual $34 billion gravy train, folks – don’t upset the apple cart, and don’t look a gift horse in the mouth – and for God’s sake, don’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg!
@Irene Laird. Since the time of population transfers out of England, Ireland and Scotland post the War of the Succession 1688 – 1746 and the arrival of the prison ships from the UK [bigger legal fiction than terra nullius] 1788 – this continent has been racially divided.
Before the arrival of the UK Prison Ships, it was a tribal mosaic. And most unfortunately, tribal societies tend to pursue tribal conflicts and warfare. The War of the Succession is a perfect example of this: the English Civil War and the Judaic racial / tribal collective against three nations and before that the civil wars which they brokered with Cromwell and the Protestant York and Scottish Rite Freemasons.
I think the idea of our 1901 founding as the Commonwealth of Australia has always been: let’s learn to live together. Racially, ethnically, culturally. These verities exist. They can be negotiated. But within an existing social order, laws which foster racial, ethnic and cultural conflicts will not work. There has to be a framework for settling conflict of law and we have such a framework.
Amendments which award sovereignty to race and tribal groups is retrograde.
Loading...
Just to add a bit more racial tension to this subject…if the Government wants to divide our Country into Black and White, with the proposed ‘Voice’, how do they work out who is black and who is just a ‘paley bastard’? Does it come down to percentages? Or if you are 90% White, 10% black can you claim to be the latter, just because you want to and anyway there is more money in it?
We don’t need our nation divided, we need a common language and an audit of how the money they are supposedly getting is being spent.
Loading...
Just a quick note re British billions and US billions. They differ by a factor of 1000. i.e. 1BB = 1000USB
In Australia we use say 1 billion is 1000 million, not like the old 1 billion being 1 million million. So $34 B divided by 875,000 who claim to be ATSI community is about $38,000 pa . After administration costs I wonder what is left??
How sad the Indigenous have been sucked in by the Greens/Labor/Union Party’s use of the BLM movement overseas. Using the Greens/Labor/Union Party’s Fabian/Marxist agenda explained in P.M. Hawkes in his famous Fabian speech on 18th May 1984. One expert’s definition of his speech is “THIS SOUNDS LIKE GLOBALISM!” The Fabian strategy is a military strategy where pitched battles and frontal assaults are avoided in favor of wearing down an opponent through a war of attrition and indirection.” Hawkes words were “Infiltration by Graduation. “For the right moment you must wait, as Fabius did, most patiently, when warring against Hannibal, but when the time comes you must strike hard, as Fabius did.”
Loading...
J Madison.. you show your colurs quite convincingly.
You share exactly the same elitist and anti-democracy values as the globalists. As in north and south Rhodesia and South Africa, you decide for everyone else.
Let me make this abundantly clear, when we have rescued our nation, not for any ‘crown’ or other elite, but for all Australians, then do not consider you are on the same side as me.
Actually, minor skin colour aside, I see no difference between you and Linda Burney; or the ‘crown’ or WEFers.
Loading...
Stop talking about representation, this is the first step in the illicit removal of Crown Title.
Already every State under their Marxist corporations are enacting legislation to strip legitimate freehold and Crown Title Lease holders of their contractual Rights to unfettered usage of the land they own.
That is, what Rights they haven’t already taken unlawfully, with corrupt environmental and land use laws.
The aim of all this is to hand first title to a few corrupt Marxist black operatives, who can easily hand ownership to Rothschild’s, so as to secure their massive and unsecured debt.
The second purpose is to destroy the white, Christian, productive society, just as the Jew banks and corporations did in South Africa and Rhodesia. Create endless, taxes,eco nazi laws, regulations, “compensation and blackfella land tax, etc. So as to break anyone who attempts to run a business.
Remember one of the sacred tennents of the criminal Marxists is to end all private ownership of Land. The first step is to devalue the Land title to nothing.
No one has spoken about calculations of what “indigenous” Australians owe “white Australians” for securing their very existence after 1940. What price is the blood shed in New Guinea and the islands north of there?
The terrorist, Australian communist party has to be outlawed.
Loading...
Marco, that’s $38k per year not $38M. Since over half of those 875,000 “aborigines” are new to being aboriginal, and being white and urban suffer no racial disadvantage from their “aboriginality”, it does seem unlikely that they would need to draw upon Federal or State resources to sponsor their lifestyles. Thousands may do so, but it is a stretch to average out the $34B welfare bill as if the $38k is the mode and not the mean. Many would take nothing, but those who do take something must take a great deal more than $38k of our resources. This latter group need to be evaluated, since clearly the resources handed to them are not well spent. Simply calling oneself “aboriginal”, regardless of the veracity of the claim, does not imply any impact upon the Federal budget.
Loading...
Maybe time to have an audit!
Loading...
Gil, People only have to look no further than the 1967 referendum which was to change the wording of the Constitution, NO less, to ensure ALL Aboriginals/ and all the types of “half” castes had laws specifically for them! Over 94% of the population voted for it.
Loading...
Marco said – “That means $34 billion divided among 875,000 equals approximately $38 million spent per person… Where is all the money going.”
You should also emphasize that’s $38 million per person PER YEAR.
But stepping back a couple of paces, I think you’re looking at this all wrong.
There’s an entire INDUSTRY out there that has been thriving for DECADES now on all those billions of dollars, just to support those supposed 875,000 indigenous people. All that counselling, all those community services, all those legal representations and consultations and fees, all those corporate kickbacks and commissions, all those high end real estate investments and endless low end real estate repairs and refurbishments, all those beauracrats taking their slice of the pie…
And just BTW, one could be forgiven for questioning the population statistics. Strange how the Tasmanian Aboriginals were allegedly wiped out, EXTINCT, yet now they’re breeding like rabbits (with all due respect to TRUE indigenous people – I smell a rat, and rats seem to gravitate to where the money is).
And $34 billion PER YEAR is enough to attract a shitload of rats.
Just saying.
Loading...
Aboriginal Minister Linda Burney sure sets off my BS meter..off the dial!
Speaking of which; is this just ‘hopium’ from Riccardo Bosi?…What is Q – who are the White Hats
If those nimbets are correct. Australian population approximately 25 million. 3.5% of 25 million equals 875,000 people. That means $34 billion divided among 875,000 equals approximately $38 million spent per person. Let that sink in.
And those promoting the ‘Voice’ say its not enough. Where is all the money going. Proper accountability is required not the ‘Voice’.
Loading...
She is so incompetent she has no choice but to just refuse to answer legitimate questions and play the Race Card.
Different subject but corresponding situation. If this bill passes nobody will be able to comment on The Voice legislation whether before or after the referendum.
https://gumshoenews.com/the-anti-free-speech-bill-proposed-legislation/#more-37242
BE SCARED BE REALLY SCARED
THE MOST DANGEROUS PIECE OF LEGISLATION REGARDING FREE SPEECH ANYONE COULD IMAGINE.
It is only matched by what goes on in COMMUNIST DICTATORSHIPS.
BLAINEY our most accepted historian speaks out on The Voice?
Before we vote on Indigenous voice to parliament, let’s get all our facts in order.?
GEOFFREY BLAINEY?
Read on –
https://seniorsdiscountclub.com.au/threads/%E2%80%98you-should-be-scared%E2%80%99.27098/
During WA’s Land Rights campaign in the 80″s I knew aboriginal crews who used 2,4,5-T herbicide – at the time they all were ignorant as to how toxic it was. They are all dead now and the WA government could not care less. At the time the maximum dioxin content allowed was point one part per million. If the chemical used was leftover’s from Vietnam the dioxin content could have been up to 15 parts per million.
Giving the aboriginals the illusion of power over the whites suits the globalist elite because of their proven tendency to be easily manipulated.I heard aborigines believing that captain Cook sailed up the WA DeGrey river shooting aborigines because some propaganda they were given said so.
The Globalists care bugger all about anyone other than their own kind. Their objective is world power and control by whatever it takes.
The approx 3% of the Australian population with their annual budget of 4.5 billion which is: the Aboriginal communities, Aboriginal people and their Box Tickers + the Aboriginal Industry and land council corporates does have a quite an influential voice and representation in government.
It is Linda Burney’s EFFING job as Minister for Aboriginal Affairs to oversea their interests, community voices, social, economic progress and development.
Fed Up! said – “Has anyone noticed that former Albo has been replaced by a skinny, younger ‘Where’s wally now” version or is it just me!”
Adrenochrome will do that (it’s what I heard).
After all, AnAL just happens to be creepy Bill’s best little mate in the whole wide world, and what better way to keep unelected inadvertent shitstain AnAL on script?
Has anyone noticed that former Albo has been replaced by a skinny, younger ‘Where’s wally now” version or is it just me!
Looking back on older Albo photo’s he looks nothing like he does now…bit like Biden
Obviously No-one wanted to wear the ‘Fat ugly bastard suit”
My Letter on The Voice, sent to the main Melbourne newspapers, this morning:
Many commentators on The Voice referendum believe that our aboriginal people will lose their sovereignty if brought into the Constitution, and I believe that this may well be the case.
Australian aborigines represent around 3% of the total population and, if The Voice should get up, this minority will not have willingly surrendered their sovereignty-our aborigines are a collective of disparate clans and tribes each with their own individual tribal sovereignty-but will have had their sovereignty stolen from them by an overwhelming white majority.
Might it be best that these tribal groups are first consulted, a Yes or No outcome determined, and, if a Yes vote succeeds, then the general referendum takes place?
I think any real aboriginal leader would, if genuine, agree to such a preliminary process.
After all, self determination is the right of anyone, black, white, or otherwise.
I posted some time ago the definition of indigenous. Indigenous means those born to a country, in simple terms, born in said country. Hence they changed the wording to First Nations, which I am not sure the definition of has exactly been established as previous definitions were based on Australian aboriginals being indigenous.
So I suggest everyone here start identifying as Aboriginal and start ticking the box. I know some here will be saying “sellout”. But it is time to get smart and use the system they introduced against them.
I believe from my research there about 10 parliamentarians identify as “First nations. Most the others cannot claim First Nations Australians, ALBO is just a start, half caste Italian. The list goes on and on.
Irene Laird said – “Or if you are 90% White, 10% black can you claim to be the latter…”
Yes, Irene, yes you can.
In fact, you can claim to be “indigenous” and access all the juicy benefits thereby cionferred, even if you happen to be 93.75% white honky, because the legal threshold to be recognised as “indigenous” by all our fake “government” agencies here in Australia is 1/16 (!).
And, of course, who’s going to bother to challenge any such claim anyway? A few snowy white examples spring immediately to mind.
And Irene Laird also said “… just because you want to and anyway there is more money in it?”
Persih the thought that a big fat trough full of that sweet sweet gravy would attract anyone with notions of financial advantage!
And anyway, it’s all perfectly LEGAL, FFS, so who the Hell WOULDN’T shove their snout in that particular trough if they had half a chance – but they don’t just have “half a chance”, they have the full endorsement and encouragement of our entire fake “government” and its labyrinth of BS PC beauracratic structures.
Fun fact – I have some relatives who are half-caste, half fully Irish white bastards and half true-blue Indigenous. Most of them “identify” as INDIGENOUS – they refuse to even acknowledge their 50% CAUCASIAN heritage. But seriously, are we surprised, when EVERYTHING pumped out by our fake “governments” promotes exactly such HATEFUL prejudice (they HATE whitey, even though they are HALF WHITE themselves!) and moreover PAYS THEM to do so?
Notably, ONE of said half-caste realtives – just ONE – has divorced hinself of the entire BS “indigenous” charade, and REFUSED to be drawn into the never-ending “victim” culture and concomitant pork barreling that defines the official Australian Aboriginal narrative.
Needless to say, that ONE individual – someone with a good dose of dignity and self-respect, not to mention self-awareness – is the ONLY person amongst all those half-caste brethren who has successfully prospered without interference or financial support from our fake “governments” and has raised a beautiful happy & healthy family in the mainstream Australian community.
And meanwhile, let’s not forget the parlous state of our fully indigenous communities dotted across the Australian landscape, whom our fake “governments” and their myriad beauracracies frankly don’t really seem to give a rat’s arse about. It’s all about that annual $34 billion gravy train, folks – don’t upset the apple cart, and don’t look a gift horse in the mouth – and for God’s sake, don’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg!
https://youtu.be/TaG9SDxwPBg
Calling all you Angels
@Irene Laird. Since the time of population transfers out of England, Ireland and Scotland post the War of the Succession 1688 – 1746 and the arrival of the prison ships from the UK [bigger legal fiction than terra nullius] 1788 – this continent has been racially divided.
Before the arrival of the UK Prison Ships, it was a tribal mosaic. And most unfortunately, tribal societies tend to pursue tribal conflicts and warfare. The War of the Succession is a perfect example of this: the English Civil War and the Judaic racial / tribal collective against three nations and before that the civil wars which they brokered with Cromwell and the Protestant York and Scottish Rite Freemasons.
I think the idea of our 1901 founding as the Commonwealth of Australia has always been: let’s learn to live together. Racially, ethnically, culturally. These verities exist. They can be negotiated. But within an existing social order, laws which foster racial, ethnic and cultural conflicts will not work. There has to be a framework for settling conflict of law and we have such a framework.
Amendments which award sovereignty to race and tribal groups is retrograde.
Just to add a bit more racial tension to this subject…if the Government wants to divide our Country into Black and White, with the proposed ‘Voice’, how do they work out who is black and who is just a ‘paley bastard’? Does it come down to percentages? Or if you are 90% White, 10% black can you claim to be the latter, just because you want to and anyway there is more money in it?
We don’t need our nation divided, we need a common language and an audit of how the money they are supposedly getting is being spent.
Just a quick note re British billions and US billions. They differ by a factor of 1000. i.e. 1BB = 1000USB
In Australia we use say 1 billion is 1000 million, not like the old 1 billion being 1 million million. So $34 B divided by 875,000 who claim to be ATSI community is about $38,000 pa . After administration costs I wonder what is left??
Proof Absolute Australia has No Lawful Govt – Tim Dwyer
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5fq3dbnJdLbM/
How sad the Indigenous have been sucked in by the Greens/Labor/Union Party’s use of the BLM movement overseas. Using the Greens/Labor/Union Party’s Fabian/Marxist agenda explained in P.M. Hawkes in his famous Fabian speech on 18th May 1984. One expert’s definition of his speech is “THIS SOUNDS LIKE GLOBALISM!” The Fabian strategy is a military strategy where pitched battles and frontal assaults are avoided in favor of wearing down an opponent through a war of attrition and indirection.” Hawkes words were “Infiltration by Graduation. “For the right moment you must wait, as Fabius did, most patiently, when warring against Hannibal, but when the time comes you must strike hard, as Fabius did.”
J Madison.. you show your colurs quite convincingly.
You share exactly the same elitist and anti-democracy values as the globalists. As in north and south Rhodesia and South Africa, you decide for everyone else.
Let me make this abundantly clear, when we have rescued our nation, not for any ‘crown’ or other elite, but for all Australians, then do not consider you are on the same side as me.
Actually, minor skin colour aside, I see no difference between you and Linda Burney; or the ‘crown’ or WEFers.
Stop talking about representation, this is the first step in the illicit removal of Crown Title.
Already every State under their Marxist corporations are enacting legislation to strip legitimate freehold and Crown Title Lease holders of their contractual Rights to unfettered usage of the land they own.
That is, what Rights they haven’t already taken unlawfully, with corrupt environmental and land use laws.
The aim of all this is to hand first title to a few corrupt Marxist black operatives, who can easily hand ownership to Rothschild’s, so as to secure their massive and unsecured debt.
The second purpose is to destroy the white, Christian, productive society, just as the Jew banks and corporations did in South Africa and Rhodesia. Create endless, taxes,eco nazi laws, regulations, “compensation and blackfella land tax, etc. So as to break anyone who attempts to run a business.
Remember one of the sacred tennents of the criminal Marxists is to end all private ownership of Land. The first step is to devalue the Land title to nothing.
No one has spoken about calculations of what “indigenous” Australians owe “white Australians” for securing their very existence after 1940. What price is the blood shed in New Guinea and the islands north of there?
The terrorist, Australian communist party has to be outlawed.
Marco, that’s $38k per year not $38M. Since over half of those 875,000 “aborigines” are new to being aboriginal, and being white and urban suffer no racial disadvantage from their “aboriginality”, it does seem unlikely that they would need to draw upon Federal or State resources to sponsor their lifestyles. Thousands may do so, but it is a stretch to average out the $34B welfare bill as if the $38k is the mode and not the mean. Many would take nothing, but those who do take something must take a great deal more than $38k of our resources. This latter group need to be evaluated, since clearly the resources handed to them are not well spent. Simply calling oneself “aboriginal”, regardless of the veracity of the claim, does not imply any impact upon the Federal budget.
Maybe time to have an audit!
Gil, People only have to look no further than the 1967 referendum which was to change the wording of the Constitution, NO less, to ensure ALL Aboriginals/ and all the types of “half” castes had laws specifically for them! Over 94% of the population voted for it.
Marco said – “That means $34 billion divided among 875,000 equals approximately $38 million spent per person… Where is all the money going.”
You should also emphasize that’s $38 million per person PER YEAR.
But stepping back a couple of paces, I think you’re looking at this all wrong.
There’s an entire INDUSTRY out there that has been thriving for DECADES now on all those billions of dollars, just to support those supposed 875,000 indigenous people. All that counselling, all those community services, all those legal representations and consultations and fees, all those corporate kickbacks and commissions, all those high end real estate investments and endless low end real estate repairs and refurbishments, all those beauracrats taking their slice of the pie…
And just BTW, one could be forgiven for questioning the population statistics. Strange how the Tasmanian Aboriginals were allegedly wiped out, EXTINCT, yet now they’re breeding like rabbits (with all due respect to TRUE indigenous people – I smell a rat, and rats seem to gravitate to where the money is).
And $34 billion PER YEAR is enough to attract a shitload of rats.
Just saying.
Aboriginal Minister Linda Burney sure sets off my BS meter..off the dial!
Speaking of which; is this just ‘hopium’ from Riccardo Bosi?…What is Q – who are the White Hats
https://www.larryhannigan.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Bosi-Explains.mp4 [5:51]
If those nimbets are correct. Australian population approximately 25 million. 3.5% of 25 million equals 875,000 people. That means $34 billion divided among 875,000 equals approximately $38 million spent per person. Let that sink in.
And those promoting the ‘Voice’ say its not enough. Where is all the money going. Proper accountability is required not the ‘Voice’.
She is so incompetent she has no choice but to just refuse to answer legitimate questions and play the Race Card.