A letter sent to Phil Benwell of the Monarchist League on May 15 to advise him he has lost the plot:
Dear Phil and Monarchists you are 30 years behind the times. Didn’t you know that Michael Larvarch AG 30 years ago wrote his own Australian Constitution and the former Commonwealth Constitution Act UK 1900 is defunct just like Lizzie. Australia has not operated lawfully since then and probably before then. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Benwell
https://www.monarchist.org.au/katter_petition?
We have Muslim members of parliament swearing allegiance to Allah, bloody murder and Albanese their God and who knows what else. Why don’t you attack them? Surely just like Charlie you are not covert Muslims? The Church (C of E) is long dead in the UK and not far behind in Australia.
What a nonsense you are running off with trying to dupe people. The crown is long dead in Australia and now the UK. We could run your petition and warn people not to sign it but the only signatures you will probably get will be poor old bumbling Tony, Peter Costello and his father in law who along with Tony financed the legal action to jail Pauline. We know her modus operandi and she has a long memory.
HCA rules Britain is a foreign power
Sue v Hill (S179-1998 and B49-1998) [1999] HCA 30.docx
You might get a few billy-goat grippers among the Liberal-National nincompoops in Parliament House or members of the shambolic bureaucracy to sign up to your useless petition. Good luck there.
We have reported about Bob Katter for 40 years and numerous other MP’s too. Bob is much more honourable than your dishonourable actions supporting a castle full of pedos at Balmoral (and Canberra).
We don’t blame Bob for disowning Charlie.
Why don’t you do something useful by trying to stop more than 100,000 babies killed each year and supported by your LNP?
We can imagine what David Flint would say about this nonsensical petition. Did you ask Nicole?
Maybe we could just publish this memo?
Regretfully yours,
Jim O’Toole
Coming to you from the Socialist Republic of Australia (don’t tell the ABC)
CFR waves white flag – Trump just killed Britain’s 100 year American project
Well folks,
The headline screams – “… unaware ‘King’ Charlie is likely a covert Muslim…”
Close, so close, but no cigar.
Because he’s not a closet Muslim, far from it, he’s a closet SATANIST.
How do we know, folks, how do we KNOW?
Because King Chuck presided over CHILD SACRIFICES in that lollipop-striped TEMPLE right there on Epstein’s notorious CHILD TRAFFICKING ISLAND. Yes that’s right folks, Our Royal Highness MURDERED and BUTCHERED CHILDREN for his Sugar Daddy Satan in the presence and full witness of his Luciferian Congregation.
Kind of casts a new light (or maybe shadow) over the Church of England, eh folks?
Hey don’t be shooting the messenger here, folks, because that’s the word on the street – from his BROTHER. Yes folks, it’s HEARSAY, nothing but legally inadmissable HEARSAY, nothing more than idle gossip floating around the web – but how do we value such hearsay which allegedly comes from King Chuck’s brother FORMER PRINCE ANDREW himself?
[…] Source link […]
The video of the naked boy attempting to escape from Buckingham is many years old, from long before AI videos went mainstream, this was when movie studios paid a small fortune for a few seconds of special effects
William Sinclair : The Stuarts bloodline migrated to other countries like Nova Scotia ,Canada and the US and Australia & NZ during the highland potato crop values and the lowland population clearances and they are very much alive today ready and willing to return .
Charles could just as well be characterized as a closet Christian Orthodox as a closet Muslim.
What can a ‘head of state’ do for Australia’s housing crisis? It’s more like a sentimental connection to the British Monarchy. Whereas Bob Katter has a “three-ingredient recipe:
Slash the red tape strangling subdivisions with mandatory two-week approval timeframes;
Cut the costly regulations driving the building of houses (and their sale prices) through the roof;
Redirect population growth and infrastructure investment into regional Australia”.
Charles belongs to a royal dynasty whose kingdom consists of its land.
.
The true kings of Britain, such as the Stuarts, adhered to the original practice of British kingship, where the kingdom consists of its people.
.
This is why, three centuries later, genuine British royalists still do not regard the Windsors as their kings. They are imposter-puppets, always have been, – just like the Hapsburgs. This particular sentiment was strongly evident at the Unite the Kingdom Rally a couple of weeks ago. Real Brits were expressing more royalist affinity towards American leaders than they’re own king of the land. I wonder why?
[…] Source link […]