Blog Archives

Mandatory vaccination for the EU just went through under the radar

from Han Barkmeyer

It does not matter if the pandemic is over and the vaccine is proven fraudulent, they are going for it anyway.

Ursula Von der Leyen, the European Commission President said 4 months ago
EU must consider mandatory Covid jabs

After June 30 2022:

The European Council has amended resolution 2361 and no longer objects to compulsory vaccination.

As of July 1 2022:

The EU has announced the legislation for the mandatory EU COVID 19 Certificates that deprive you of all freedoms if you do not have a QR COVID certificate.
If there is a majority of member states signing the legislation, compulsory vaccination will be introduced.

At the end of 2022/2023 there will be a digital currency.

The EU will impose a digital ID on every EU citizen. (The Dutch already have this and are already referring to the EU version on the website).

All ATMs will be replaced by QR code ATMs in the near future, Belgium is already installing them full swing.

If these QR code machines are integrated, cash can no longer be withdrawn from banks and/or elsewhere.

The EU aims to make cash completely worthless within 18 months.

The EU resolution permanently deprives every person of their physical integrity.

Of course, this has been planned a long time ago.
Ursula Von der Leyen, the European Commission President said 4 months ago:
‘EU must consider mandatory Covid jabs.’

The European Commission isn’t directly elected by citizens in the EU. But the President of the Commission needs to be approved by Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who are elected by voters from member states. MEPs also vote on whether to approve Commissioners who are nominated by governments of member states. ‘Democratic’ means different things to different people.

Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi: Ideological Father of the EU

Richard’s cause was globalism. In 1923, he founded the International Pan-European Union, which he would head until his death. Its flag was oddly similar to the Japanese imperial flag. This was the outfit that first got the ball rolling, beginning the ideological impetus eventually leading to the leviathan of the European Union.

His inherited wealth and privileged status allowed him to associate with many world leaders, enjoying access unknown to their own common citizens. He even tried to hit up Mussolini for support, but Il Duce didn’t buy it. Richard also associated with ultra-wealthy, anti-nationalist bankers who took quite an interest, such as Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild and Max Warburg. The latter donated heavily to his early efforts and served as a liaison to Wall Street whiz kid Bernard Baruch.

The European Union Flag features a circle, symbol of unity, of 12 golden stars on a blue background. It was designed by the Jew Paul Lévy, a Holocaust survivor.

Of course, they don’t want the Goyim to know that the 12 golden stars represent the 12 Tribes of Israel.

NSW court bombshell: Government admits by default vaccinations are not mandatory

Hazzard’s bullying tactics are coming back to haunt him.


THE bully-boy bluffing tactics of NSW Health Minister Brad Hazzard have been exposed in the ongoing case in the NSW Supreme Court because his barrister has been forced to admit the government “is not forcing” key workers to get mandatory vaccination.

All the while, Hazzard, Chant and company and their media cheer squad have been telling the people of NSW “the government is making vaccines mandatory”. But that is one big con and one big lie. No, they are “not forcing mandatory vaccinations” because they can’t. They don’t have any such lawful right, except in the most extreme, individual circumstances.

What Hazzard’s lawyer told the court is a defacto admission that our right at common law to informed consent to medical treatment prevails over the so-called “orders” and “directions” of chief health officers over the general population.

As pointed out by Mike Palmer of Know Your Rights and various lawyers, in Australian state law such orders lawfully only apply when a health officer identifies an individual deemed to be a threat to public health who is issued with a court-approved quarantine or treatment order.

The admission has exposed the fact that Hazzard and his so-called health minister colleagues and CHOs in other states have been using unlawful coercion and bullying of the general population to push the mass vaccination experiment. The stunning court developments have been ignored by all but one mainstream media channel, the online Daily Mail UK.

But word is getting out and the media and the remaining tyrant premiers are panicking, trying to defend their position. The new conservative Catholic NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet is no doubt briefed on the court case and is pushing economic recovery to fix Hazzard and Berejikilian’s trail of destruction – which includes the lives of those maimed or killed by the experimental mRNA and other COVID vaccines.

The Daily Mail UK report was headlined “Bombshell as court hears no one in NSW HAS to get Covid jab”. The Australian mainstream media ignored this development, instead, wailing about the loss of Berejiklian and attacking Perrottet, one day into his new job.

Hazzard’s smirking but probably very nervous barrister Jeremy Kirk explained to the court that “mandatory jabs are simply a way to become exempt from some lock down laws and workers can choose not to be vaccinated but then will stay in strict lock down.” Oh how very nifty Mr Kirk. But that’s not how your client put it to the people of NSW.

“There is no requirement for vaccination,” Kirk told the court. “There is a condition on the exception (to the stay-at-home orders) which people can take advantage of, or not.” He went on to say the state probably did have the power to force people to be vaccinated if ‘some terrible disease’ like Ebola were threatening society.

Yes Mr Kirk, that’s right. The right at common law to informed consent to medical treatment can only be overridden when someone or some group shows up with Ebola or some other plague and in these rare cases where there is a clear, serious public health threat, the medical officer gives an order, backed up by a court, for action to be taken e.g. quarantine or vaccination.

The case before Justice Robert Beech-Jones involves 10 complainants including a teacher, health care worker and mechanic, who are challenging the legality of the government edicts which “require” teachers and aged care workers to be vaccinated before returning to work and force some workers to be vaccinated against their will to be able to go to work.

They’re also fighting orders requiring authorised workers to prove they’ve been vaccinated before they can leave so-called coronavirus hotspots in Sydney and that Hazzard had no power to sign off on them.

NSW teachers and care workers have been told they must be vaccinated by November 8, or they won’t be allowed to attend schools and aged care workers “also need to have received at least one dose before the end of the month” with health care workers “having until the end of November to get both doses”.

Closing submissions in the case were heard last Wednesday October 6th. We await the judge’s rulings with interest.

Update: The comments we previously attributed to Professor Kristine Macartney who is a witness in this case appear to be incorrect and have been deleted. AFL Solicitors has advised: “This did not originate from AFL and we do not endorse that message. The statements made by Know your rights are not in the transcript.” Cairns News apologises for the error.

Petition to stop mandatory vaccination

Petition for numerous countries to stop mandatory vaccines

Please sign and distribute widely

New York dumps ‘religious beliefs’ defence for stopping mandatory vaccination

%d bloggers like this: