Letter to the Editor
We have a REASON to thank Albanese
On the 1st July 2023 the National Anti- Corruption Act 2022 comes into force. Every Australian is now entitled to ask for and get a jury trial in every matter, civil or criminal and it is corruption to refuse in either a State or Federal Court. This is because in 1995 the “Kable Principle” was argued in the High Court and became common law, in 1996. The “Kable Principle” is that NO STATE can make a law contradicting S 79 Constitution and NO State can make a law discriminating against a Subject of the King and in any criminal matter the Commonwealth standard must apply. No more Majority verdicts whatsoever. All or nothing.

Way back in 1914 the Crimes Act 1914 was enacted to ensure the honesty and integrity of the Judicial Power of the Commonwealth. That is because S 79 Constitution mandates that the judges who will decide the guilt or innocence of the accused are drawn from the General Public, who like our elected judges in the Parliament of the Commonwealth are charged with making the common law. If a Court with a Judge (singular) sits it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Mr Magistrate can be accused of attempting to pervert the course of justice in respect of the Judicial power of the Commonwealth.
The course of justice in respect of the Judicial power of the Commonwealth makes the Common Law sacred in S 80 Judiciary Act 1903. Corporations can and are sued for criminal misdeeds. They cannot be imprisoned. To remedy this a Corporation, if convicted MUST pay a pecuniary penalty. By S 4B Crimes Act 1914 this is five times what they would be required to pay if an individual. A breach of S 43 Crimes Act 1914 which a Judge or Magistrate sitting without a jury is, attracts ten years imprisonment. Ten years imprisonment attracts a liquidated penalty of $165,000 at today’s Penalty Unit Rate of $275.00. By S 4K Crimes Act 1914 this penalty accrues daily.
Every Member of the Parliament of the Commonwealth and Senator is subject to a compulsory duty to report breaches to the National Anti-Corruption Commission. Starting in 1984 Bob Hawke and the Australian Labor Party repealed the Queen Victoria’s Letters Patent 1900. That Letters Patent created ONE integrated Judicial system. The Australian Letters Patent created by Bob Hawke and confirmed by Kevin Rudd made it possible for the Parliament of the Commonwealth to enact an Unconstitutional S 9 Australia Act 1986 prohibiting courts with judges holding Legislation unconstitutional. The National Anti-Corruption Commission will have power to declare these corrupt changes illegal. By S 32 National Anti- Corruption Act 2022 any person may refer an issue to the National Anti-Corruption Commission.
Just the fact that the National Anti-Corruption Commission is there will be enough to see a big improvement in our governments.
John Grey
Cairns
Thanks. Yes I realise that only “trial by jury” (not jury trial – listen to Delores Cahill on the difference) is the only constitutional law. But the article seemed to imply that the Act restated that and there were penalties under the criminal code for non compliance. Perhaps I mis read that. We have lots of issues waiting to go to a lawful court with paper witnesses already established by Notice processes. People would be far more ready to self represent in a trial by jury that seeking “justice” in the existing court system.
So on what basis was the author making those claims as many courts, as you know, do not operate under the constitution. Thank for passing on my comments. Bless you all at Cairnsnews 🙏🙏🙏💕
Sent from my iPhone
>
All courts are Chapter 3 Courts of the Constitution. It is this document that allows for juries. I will pass on your query
to the author. Ed
Hi there at the amazing Cairns News Ive just briefly read through this Act and cannot see that reference. If it is true then this is a major major change. How do the small courts physically cater for this If you could ask the author to find the exact section that would be great. Thanks
We have lots of issues waiting to prosecute with in common law so would appreciate a reply Thanks A
>
The InJustice System already costs too much. Juries are not cheap and the fee given is risible.
At ‘Common Law’, the King or his Lords could kill anyone. No issues arose to be determined by the King’s Justiciars. The early ones brought the laws of all the regions of England to the rest of England but rejected some. All felonies were capital. The law was to enable commoners to be dealt with.
Be careful what you wish for. Witch trials are a common occurrence. Ms K. Holbigg is just the latest.
Trial by media is the rule here.
It might be the case but ask for a jury and see how you go. Ed
Any court. Ed
This has ALWAYS been the case. Albotrans is irrelevannt.
FFS …this has Always been in Australian law…it’s enshrined with our Constitution which includes the Magna Carta
Clive R
Do these changes also affect the Family Court of Australia?