When a white Londoner ran over 11 Muslims in front of a London mosque the UK ruling elite called it a heinous act.
Leading the charge, Prime Minister Theresa May expressed outrage, describing the deliberate injury of the Muslim worshippers by running over them with a van as an “evil act borne out of hatred.”
“We want extremism and hatred driven out of society,” Theresa May told reporters.
What strange people the elite, including the Islamic Mayor, turn out to be when the boot is on the other foot. Here we have a fed-up, 47 year old ordinary British man not known to authorities, who simply had seen enough carnage inflicted on normal people at the hands of Muslim extremists.
After running over the worshippers, he shouted: “I want to kill all Muslims.” He took the problem into his own hands, targeting Muslims at the Finsbury Park mosque.
Islamists have carried out numerous attacks and mass killings of people across Europe particularly at London Bridge on June 4, where seven people , including two Australian women were killed after being mowed down by a van driven by a mad Islamic.
Police shot dead three of the madmen in the aftermath of the slaughter.
Any casual observer could be forgiven for saying: “Tough luck Mussies, you are wearing a revenge attack and you can probably expect more of the same.”
“You think it is OK to mass murder Christians in Syria or elsewhere around the world by cutting off their heads, burning them alive or by slow drowning, so call it an eye for an eye, albeit minus the Islamic savagery.”
“Is it OK to kill hundreds of people in Paris without considering there could be retaliation?”
It does not bode well for Australia with its own horde of Muslim immigrants, many with military experience. The extent to which Islam has overtaken the UK is listed below.
List of Mayors in UK that are Muslim with 3,000 Muslim Mosques, 130 Sharia Courts
Now the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:
Mayor of London … MUSLIM
Mayor of Birmingham … MUSLIM
Mayor of Leeds … MUSLIM
Mayor of Blackburn … MUSLIM
Mayor of Sheffield … MUSLIM
Mayor of Oxford … MUSLIM
Mayor of Luton … MUSLIM
Mayor of Oldham … MUSLIM
Mayor of Rochdale … MUSLIM
Over 3,000 Muslim Mosques
Over 130 Muslim Sharia Courts
Over 50 Muslim Sharia Councils
Muslims-Only No-Go Areas Across The UK
Muslim Women … 78% don’t work and are on FREE benefits/housing
Muslim Men … 63% don’t work and are on FREE benefits/housing
Muslim Families … 6-8 children planning to go on FREE benefits/housing
… and now all UK schools are ONLY serving HALAL MEAT!
All this achieved by just 4 million or 2.6 per cent of Muslims out of the 66 million population!
Germany is appalled by a crime that defies description in brutality. The victim is in hospital and in danger of dying.
The incident took place Sunday evening in Hameln in Lower Saxony.
The offender is 36 years old, his victim is 28 years. According to German Bild, both come from large Turkish-Kurdish families living in Germany.
They have previously lived together. The couple were married under Islamic law and had a child together.
Police do not yet know the motive for the man’s bestial act. But there is information about how the horrific crime occurred.
Early Sunday evening, the man tied a rope around the neck of his ex-girlfriend and Islamic spouse. Then he tied the rope to the trailer hitch of his car. He then got into the car and drove off through the city, with the woman scraping along the asphalt behind the car.
He drove about 250 meters with the increasingly bloody woman. Residents in the area have told that along the way he increased the car’s speed considerably.
The woman had certainly suffered a horrible death if it was not for the rope at one point breaking free from the car. It is not known if the rope broke or whether the knot that tied it to the trailer hitch loosened.
Witnesses found the abused woman in an unconscious state beside the road, and a rescue helicopter took her to a specialist clinic as she was extremely injured.
At the same time the man reported himself to the police at a police station nearby and was arrested. He has so far been silent about his motive.
Police have launched special safeguard measures for fear of reprisals from the woman’s family.
The local newspaper Deister- und Weser Zeitung reports that the woman, beyond the terrible injuries from being dragged, also had stab wounds.
Because of the investigation, the police did not want to comment on this information. But they deny rumors on social media that there there have been an exchange of gunfire.
A spokesman for the city of Hameln, Thomas Wahmes, said Monday: “It’s unbelievable, with the brutality and disregard for human life in which this action has taken place. Here all are in shock.”
This is not happening far away. It is happening in the heart of Europe.
In the midst of a peaceful German town, a completely different world opens up – with such violence and oppression of women which they were not prepared for, and with the prospect of it all turning even worse.
Allan Jones tips the bucket on a sneaky clause in the Federal Budget allowing Arab money to enter Australia to buy public infrastructure and get a big tax deduction on profits. This is the result of Liberal and Labor free marketing and deregulation and Australia loses its last vestige of sovereignty. Following Sharia finance is Sharia law.
Future Middle Eastern Investment (Shariah Law)
AUSTRALIANS WILL NOT COP SHARIA LAW
Family Matters No. 84
Legal recognition of Sharia law
Is this the right direction for Australian family matters?
A new direction for a pluralistic nation?
Australia is marked by pluralism – cultural, religious and ethnic. Yet, our legal system is not pluralistic. Apart from some concessions to the Indigenous peoples of this country, we abide by the “one law for all” mantra. Both sides of politics have rejected a separate stream of law for specific religious or ethnic communities on the basis that Australia is a secular nation. Freedom of religion and worship is protected, but religion is to play no part in the formal legal system. Australia’s former treasurer, Peter Costello (2006), argued, “there is one law we are all expected to abide by. It is the law enacted by the Parliament under the Australian Constitution. If you can’t accept that then you don’t accept the fundamentals of what Australia is and what it stands for” (para. 44). This year, Attorney-General Robert McCelland confirmed that the “Rudd government is not considering and will not consider the introduction of any part of Sharia law into the Australian legal system” (Zwartz, 2009).
Research undertaken by Dunn (2005) and Poynting, Noble, Tabar, and Collins (2004) indicates that there is a high level of apprehension among the general population about Muslims “in our suburbs”, which gives support to the contention that the majority of Australians accept and endorse the “one law for all” approach. However, this position does raise challenges for Australian Muslims for whom adherence to their religious law – the Sharia1 – is an Islamic obligation and not a matter of personal preference, particularly in regard to family matters.
The issue of whether Australia should give formal legal recognition to Sharia law in resolving family law disputes involving Muslims will be canvassed in this paper. The case for and against such recognition is outlined. Debate on this issue has gained currency across common law jurisdictions due to several recent events. One was the legal recognition given to Islamic arbitration in the province of Ontario, Canada, in 2004. Although the enabling sections of the Arbitration Act were subsequently repealed, it did ignite the possibility that within a common law system there could be faith-based dispute resolution for family law and other legal matters. The second event was the Archbishop of Canterbury’s address to the Royal Courts of Justice (Williams, 2008), in which he promoted the concept of Britain becoming a “plural jurisdiction” by accommodating aspects of Sharia law. Although this speech provoked opposition from some other members of Britain’s legal, political and religious communities (including some Muslim groups), the Lord Chief Justice of Britain came to the Archbishop’s defence by also supporting alternative dispute resolution using Sharia principles. Whether this is the right direction for Australia or whether we should retain the status quo needs consideration and debate.
This paper examines arguments that have been raised for and against the official recognition of Sharia law and finds that, on balance, the status quo should prevail.
The case for official recognition
Sharia law is already operating in Australia
Given that many of Australia’s 350,000 Muslims (Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS], 2006) are already regulating their lives according to Sharia, it is logical to officially recognise and support this. Sharia regulates the legal relationships many Australian Muslims enter into and out of, including marriage, divorce, custody and inheritance, as well as contractual and commercial dealings. Among Australian Muslims, there exists a strong preference to have legal questions answered and disputes settled by persons with Islamic credentials. Except in rare cases, this does not mean there is rejection of Australian laws, but instead there is a desire to conform with Sharia law when it is possible to do so. Muslims as minorities in secular societies like Australia have been recognised as skilled “cultural navigators” (Yilmaz, 2005), able to manoeuvre through two systems of law, one of their nation and the other of their faith.
Complying with both systems of laws is one approach that can and is being taken. In Australia, marriage is a good example where there can readily be dual compliance. The Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) accommodates Islamic marriages by allowing marriages to be performed and registered by a Muslim marriage celebrant, usually an Imam, without the need for a separate registering event or ceremony. Polygynist marriages, however, remain problematic, being unlawful under section 94 of the Act.
Australian Islamic Mission (Punchbowl Mosque) is behind the Bendigo Mosque. The Security Report details support for the Muslim Brotherhood, the Caliphate and Sharia Law for Australia.
The Report was prepared for the Concerned Citizens of Bendigo and details speakers that Punchbowl has endorsed by allowing them to present at their mosque and the subject matter they champion.
The Report details support for the Muslim Brotherhood, the establishment of a caliphate, call for jihad, Hate Speech and Sharia Law for Australia.
The concerns raised by this report led to it being submitted to the Bendigo Council Planning Department at 3.00 pm prior to the Bendigo Meeting to Vote on the Mosque Planning Application. Later we were informed that it was glossed over at the final Council briefing. The Bendigo Planning Department either knowingly or unknowingly chose not to make Councillors aware of its contents.
This same report was submitted to National Security. Two days later Australia’s borders were coincidentally closed due to Islamic Terrorism.
This Security Report was subsequently submitted to VCAT for consideration of “security” for Bendigo in this recent hearing. Even though objectors opted not to present the materials personally due to heavy media bias—it was once again put aside by those meant to be protecting our safety and interests.
Yesterday the Bendigo Advertiser reported on the difficulty Bendigo Residents Group have had in getting expert witnesses willing to appear at this Hearing and to speak up against the mosque planning permits because of this same heavy media bias around the issue.
We believe this information needs to get out in Australia’s best interests. Please read the report and please Share. We need to bypass the ongoing media bias that is attempting to suffocate information on this subject.
HERE IS THE FULL REPORT—Interim Security Report on Australian Islamic Mission, backers of the Bendigo Mosque.
EXTRACT OF THE REPORT:
On Saturday 13 June 2010 there was an Official Launch of AIM Mosque —School Fundraising Campaign to raise funds for the development of a mosque and school in Punchbowl. The Guest Speak was Dr Tareq Al-Suwaidan who is described as a “renowned Islamic Author” and Entrepreneur from Kuwait—(He is rated second in world of Islamic Speakers, he has a PHD in Petroleum Engineering and a leader of Muslim Brotherhood in Kuwait. He describes himself as a modest Islamic. He also made a point of saying that he was not getting paid for this…”This is my contribution to the Muslim Ummah.”)
You need to watch this video. He is a jihadi and in preaching jihad to the audience…It is a long video (145 minutes) but I recommend you watch it to get the full import of the message.
Dr Tareq Al-Suwaidan: The Future of Islam—“We want to lead the world because we believe deeply that we have the system to make humanity happy. We believe it deeply.”
“Islam shall conquer the World”
He seems to be encouraging the congregation to jihad he says
“When you love this life so much and hate death so much, then you become weak. This Ummah has only one hope: it is to love al-Akhira (the Afterlife) and be ready to die”
“ The victory is coming. It is the duty of everyone of us.”
He spells out the importance of establishing Muslim schools, mosques, community organisation etc to further the cause.
Ed Husic officially sworn in on the Koran by Governor General Quentin Bryce at Government House in Canberra. Picture: Penny Bradfield
Ed Husic swore in as the Prime Minister’s new parliamentary secretary on the Koran in 2013.
This was the set of principles he was swearing against as his “moral code”.
They include gender inequality, religious intolerance, anti-democracy, bigotry, inequality and racism—all of it very unAustralian.
These verses are only a handful from the Koran, however for every verse here, there are many others to support them.
These are the basic tenets of Islam and they certainly don’t belong in Australia let alone in an Australian Parliament.
Point 1 was reiterated in his statement to the press: “Mr Husic has previously said that he is a moderate Muslim who does not involve himself heavily with most of the religious customs and behaviours of the faith.”
Some of the tenets of Islam according to the Koran:
1. Hide your faith: Qur’an (40:28) – A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must “hide his faith”among those who are not believers.”
2. Sharia Law over Australian Law: Qur’an (33:36) – “It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision.”
3. Islam for all Australia: Qur’an (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah”