Petition to ban chemtrails
from Activist Post
April 8, 2016
On April 6, 2016 country music legend Merle Haggard passed away at the age of 79. Haggard was one of the most legendary country music performers and artists in the music industry with more than 36 number one country hits to his credit. Haggard’s career was more than that of a typical country performer. His songs touched a chord with the working man, the down and out and the outsider in a way that few artists could ever hope to do.
“Country music has suffered one of the greatest losses it will ever experience,” said Charlie Daniels on Twitter. “Rest in peace Merle Haggard.” Haggard was well known for country gems like “I think I’ll Just Stay Here and Drink,” “Mama Tried,” “Sing Me Back Home,” “The Bottle Let Me Down,” “If We Make It Through December” and “Silver Wings.”
But he was also known for songs like “Okie from Muskogee,” a possibly satirical or possibly real (Haggard would never say which one) commentary on the cultural divide in the 1960s. Haggard was also known for “The Fightin’ Side of Me” an uber-patriotic song that Haggard himself claimed probably set “my career back 40 years.” While the latter song seemed to glorify some of the worst elements in American society at the time, in his later years, Haggard came to speak out against imperialist warfare.
Haggard also stood up for American farmers by taking part in Willie Nelson’s Farm Aid. What has gone surprisingly under-reported, however, is Haggard’s outspoken criticism of the practice of geoengineering – also known as chemtrails.
In his song “What I Hate” Haggard sang: “What I hate is looking up and seeing/Chemtrails in a clear blue sky today.”
Characteristically, Haggard was unafraid to bring up the chemtrail issue in an interview with NPR. But the interviewer did not press him and simply skimmed over the rest of the issue.
Haggard died on his 79th birthday, a prediction he made a week prior to his death of complications from pneumonia. Natural Blaze.com
(NaturalNews) A leading climate scientist from the U.K. had a Freudian slip moment recently when he admitted, perhaps without realizing it, that climate geoengineering in the form of “chemtrails” is not only not some wild conspiracy theory, but is an actual thing happening all around the world right now.
Professor Tim Lenton, chair of Climate Change/Earth Systems Science at the University of Exeter in the U.K., participated in a question and answer session at the Our Common Future Under Climate Change conference in Paris back in July, where he agreed to answer a compelling question about weather modification and its effects on our planet.
Olga Raffa from Chemtrails Project U.K. asked Prof. Lenton why “ongoing” geoengineering programs are taking place without any research as to their outcomes. She also asked about how the use of “aerosols” is justified when the aluminum, barium and other chemicals they contain is a known killer of bees.
“I represent a large group of people who are wondering why programs such as weather modification and ongoing geoengineering programs throughout the world have not been taken into consideration with a lot of the research done,” Raffa asked, pointing to the ongoing climate change debate and its lack of attention on geoengineering.
“And we notice, on a daily basis, that our environment is being tipped through the aerosols being dumped into the atmosphere blocking our sun.
And there seems to be a lot of aluminum in the environment – within the bees now have aluminum, and it’s destroying their, well, there’s a bee collapse obviously with the insects and the biodiversity.” Raffa also brought up electromagnetic radiation (EMF), HAARP (the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), covert military programs and other hard-hitting topics that many other climate scientists have chosen to ignore – but not Prof. Lenton.
In his response to Raffa’s questions, Prof. Lenton expressed opposition to “sunlight reflection methods” and “large-scale carbon removal methods,” both of which are among the excuses given for spraying the skies with streaming banners of clouding chemicals.
Prof. Lenton admits to ‘current uncontrolled experiment’ in reference to geoengineering However, in a follow-up question posed by Dr. Colin Pritchard from the University of Edinburgh, Prof. Lenton offered even more along the lines of admission that such weather modification programs are not just proposed concepts for the future, but actual activity taking place today.
When pressed about his thoughts on the dangers inherent to “enormous global-scale uncontrolled experiment[s]” using geoengineering, Prof Lenton responded:
“I think we have to be nuanced on specific proposals, specific technologies. But I think we can perhaps all agree that certainly none of us want to continue the current uncontrolled experiment.” In other words, governments and whomever else are involved in geoengineering efforts are currently engaged in a large-scale, uncontrolled experiment, according to this admission by Prof. Lenton. And like many of the rest of us, he wants to see this experiment halted in favor of sound scientific proposals.
But in order to get there, it must first be acknowledged that this experiment is real, which is something that chemtrail-deniers can’t seem to get through their dense skulls. It’s no longer an argument over whether or not chemtrails are real – they are – but rather whether or not they’ve begun, which mounting evidence suggests was many, many years ago.
Prof. Lenton has since denied that his statements were in reference to geoengineering and chemtrails, but Chemtrails Project U.K. says this is just a lame attempt at backtracking.
“It is … clear that the ‘uncontrolled experiment’ that Lenton refers to is the same ‘uncontrolled experiment in geoengineering‘ concern raised by Pritchard,” the group maintains. “We know this because the former is immediately addressing the latter.” Sources for this article include:
ChemtrailsProjectUK.com “According to the “Fair Use” clause of International Copyright Law, the authors declare that the use of the photos, videos and information in this academic research are analyzed for purposes of “criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research” according to Section 107 of Title 17 of the US Code.”