Category Archives: flu vaccine
By Tony Mobilifonitis
KIWIS face the most crucial election in their history on October 17, with both major parties – Labor and the “opposition” Nationals – now united on running with the medical dictatorship model driven by the Gates-Rockefeller-World Economic Forum “global health” cabal.
Despite the New Zealand High Court’s bizarre recent ruling that the first nine days of Ardern’s lockdown was “unlawful but justified”, the National Party leader Judith Collins has joined with Ardern in using “the virus” to impose a medical tyranny.
Collins wants to make it compulsory for everyone entering the country and border workers to carry contact tracing technology, which is the thin edge of the wedge for the vaccination certificates floated by her fellow fake conservative across the Tasman, Scott Morrison.
There is little or nothing separating the COVID policies of the major parties on either side of the ditch, prompting another desperate attempt by NZ Public Party leader Billy Te Kahika to rally the collection of minor parties into some sort of united front that can mount an effective challenge at the election.
Under New Zealand’s mixed-member proportional (MMP) electoral system, introduced in 1996, smaller parties have a better chance of gaining seats, especially in alliances.
“I will approach minor parties again because we need to work together to defend democracy and protect our economy. We are dealing with a very hostile government,” he said on a recent YouTube broadcast. He says 87% of all businesses in Auckland are on some sort of government subsidy, which makes a joke of Ardern’s Labor Party election slogan “Let’s Keep Moving”.
“We’ve got people just creating fear and panic to create systems of control like we’ve never seen. We have less than 40 cases in New Zealand but we’ve got roadblocks, checkpoints and normalization of mask wearing.”
NZPP has formed an alliance with ex-Nationals MP Jami-Lee Ross, whose Advance New Zealand Party has also merged with several other smaller parties. An alliance of small parties in 1996 won 10 per cent of the total vote, gaining 13 MPs. Australian minor parties have to rely on preference distributions which can, in rare circumstances, put a larger minor party like One Nation into a seat.
One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson, by the way, has taken a strong stand against Morrison’s vaccine push, declaring in a new video she will not have any COVID vaccine shot. She already does not take flu shots. This should be a major issue in the upcoming Queensland state election on October 31.
Morrison’s proposed deal with the pharma giant Astra Zeneca to push the so-called Oxford Vaccine is nothing more than a neo-Nazi eugenics system which makes unvaccinated people a restricted class of outcasts, banned from restaurants, jobs, government entitlements, education and travel.
The policy recalls Hitler’s Germany in 1935-36, when Jews were denied the vote and banned from all professional jobs, effectively preventing them from exerting any influence in education, politics, higher education and industry.
Meanwhile Ardern, the neo-fascist witch of the south, has upped the ante in pushing her medical tyranny even further, with new “rules” forcing people testing positive to COVID-19 (or is it just coronavirus i.e. colds and flu?) to quarantine in “government facilities” for two weeks. Those who refuse tests get four weeks incarceration for exercising their right at common law to informed consent to medical treatment.
Te Kahika says he heard from desperate families inside the detention centres where there’s no-one to talk to from health department. He’s alarmed that health authorities will detain family members and separate them from children.
In one incident late in July members of a young family absconded from a quarantine facility to go to the tangi (funeral) of the father. They had tested negative but been refused an exemption to go to Auckland from the facility in Hamilton.
The High Court case last week was initiated by Wellington lawyer Andrew Borrowdale, who challenged the legality of the early stages of the lockdown, including calls by Ardern and others between March 26 and April 3 for New Zealanders to stay home.
In a bizarre ruling, the court found that while there was “no question that the requirement was a necessary, reasonable and proportionate response to the COVID-19 crisis at the time”, it was not prescribed by law and was therefore contrary to section 5 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act.
Letter to the Editor
This message is directed to AHPRA’s CEO – Martin Fletcher
I am forced by a government mandate to have a flu shot to again visit my elderly mother in an aged care facility.
It has now been 9 weeks since I visited her and it looks like that I will never see her again because of this ‘mandate’.
For her, this is mental torment not seeing those of her healthy family members who are concerned about being vaccinated.
What concerns me are the ingredients contained in the various Influenza vaccines are shown at this link https://avn.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/aborted-fetal-tissue.jpg
as obtained from the Centre for Disease Control website https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf
Worse still, another website says that there are very serious side effects of these substances in the flu vaccines at this link http://d2qru3puhm7uxm.cloudfront.net/uploads/image/article/013/120/13120/header_custom/13120_7887_576_Kohls_993a.gif
All of this is very confusing and concerning to me as someone who has no technical understanding about vaccines and their safety.
In an article I read, you are quoted as saying:
“We take seriously any case of practitioners spreading dangerous and misleading anti-vaccination information including on social media,” Mr Fletcher said.
“They will face regulatory action or prosecution. We are asking the public to tell us if their practitioner is doing this. If you raise your concerns with us we can investigate and protect others.”
In light of your statements above, I feel it is appropriate that you provide me with sufficient links that I can go to that show where peer-reviewed testing of these vaccines has been carried out that prove the side effects claimed in the above images are incorrect or indeed “dangerous and misleading” as you say.
As I want to be able to visit my mother again, it is vitally important for me to know what is “dangerous and misleading” information about the safety of vaccines.
I am looking for your guidance as to whether I should have the flu vaccine Mr. Fletcher.
Any assistance you can provide me here would be most appreciated.
A reader asked the UK Minister how much compensation had been paid to vaccination injuries. This is the reply from the Minister:
Our ref: DE00000934644
Dear Mr. Or………..,
Thank you for your correspondence of 11 May to the Department of Health about compensation payments under the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS). I have been asked to reply.
As you may be aware, the UK Government established the VDPS to provide a measure of financial help in those rare circumstances where it is established that severe disability was caused by a particular vaccination.
Payments made under the VDPS are not compensation, and this does not prejudice the right of the disabled person to pursue a claim for damages through the courts. Payments do not seek to address all the financial implications of disablement, but is only one part of the wide range of help available to severely disabled people in the UK. Those in receipt of VDPS payments remain eligible for state benefits.
VDPS provides a tax-free, lump sum payment, now £120,000, for those who are severely disabled as a result of a vaccination against those diseases listed in the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 and those subsequently specified by statutory instrument.
Since 1979, a total of 6,069 claims have been received and 932 awards made, totalling £12.75million (initial amount paid) with £60.9million (top-up payments), as of 13 May 2015.
The UK Government has made several Orders since 1979 to increase the amount of the statutory sum awarded to eligible claimants. In July 2000, the sum was increased from £40,000 to £100,000. At that time, the then Secretary of State also made provision for an additional extra-statutory (top-up) payment to be made to all those that are awarded a statutory sum of less than £100,000 under the provisions of the
Appropriation Act to bring those awards up to a real terms equivalent of the £100,000 award.
In July 2007, an Order was made to increase the statutory sum from £100,000 to £120,000, which remains the current amount. This amount is awarded for new claims made on or after 12 July 2007 that are successful.
The Department is unable to provide a breakdown of how many claims have been made in respect of swine flu or each particular disease. This is because the claimant is advised to list all vaccinations on the claim form that they, or the disabled person, have received. It is this information that is recorded on the Vaccine Damage Payment Unit’s database.
Although the claimant may cite a particular vaccination in the notes box on the claim form which they believe to have caused their disability, all vaccinations that have been administered that are included in the Act are taken into account during the medical assessment of the claim. A number of vaccinations may be given in close proximity to each other, often on the same day, and it is not always possible to isolate a particular vaccination as being the cause of the claimed
However, no payments have currently been made where swine flu has been listed amongst the vaccinations administered.
Further information about the VDPS can be found at:
I hope this reply is helpful.
Ministerial Correspondence and Public Enquiries
Department of Health
Please do not reply to this email. To contact the Department of Health, please visit the ‘Contact DH’
section on the GOV.UK website.