THE following article was posted under the Creationism page on Facebook by Indian lawyer, scholar and businessman Mahmood Kadri. He was formerly administrator at DY Patil Group, manager at the British Deputy High Commission, general manager at Ecole Mondiale World School and chief administrator at the Japanese School attached to Consulate General of Japan in Mumbai.
By MAHMOOD KADRI
Many scientists have opposed evolution, responding that it is a false theory without evidence. Among them are:
1-David Berlinski, a mathematician, molecular biologist, and philosopher, is one of the most famous critics of evolution. He sees it as something promoted among people under the name of science and fact, while in reality, his doubts about it only grew as science advanced.
He publicly declared this skepticism in Commentary magazine in 1996 in an article titled The Deniable Darwin. In recent years, he published his famous book The Devil’s Delusion (2008), and his interviews are filled with remarks about how real scientists mock evolution. They also contain biting scientific sarcasm directed at the imaginary assumptions of evolution and its fatal weaknesses.
Likewise, Michael Denton, a biochemist, once believed in evolution, but as he discovered dozens of fatal flaws with the progress of molecular biology, he authored his famous book Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (1985). This was one of the first books in the modern era to turn the theory of evolution upside down.
He also contributed to many scientific documentaries about the exquisite precision and signs of intelligent design in life, Earth, and the universe, all the way to humankind. His work Nature’s Destiny (1998) was later translated as well.
2-Michael Behe, a biochemist and professor at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, also began doubting evolution as his scientific specialization deepened and new discoveries emerged—especially after reading Denton’s Evolution: A Theory in Crisis.
He found that all the points Denton raised indeed refuted random, chance-based evolution. Behe then authored his famous book Darwin’s Black Box (1996). He became one of the most prominent founders of the academic framework of Intelligent Design, particularly through his concept of irreducible complexity, which he argued demonstrates the impossibility of gradual, random evolution over time and instead points toward teleology in the sudden appearance of complex organs by some designer.
3-William Dembski, an American mathematician and philosopher, is also a strong opponent of Darwin’s theory of natural selection. Dembski argues that the details of living organisms can be described in similar terms, particularly molecular sequence patterns in functional biological molecules such as DNA.
His discussion of specified complexity has been highly controversial in the scientific community. Supporters of Intelligent Design consider it a legitimate research program investigating the effects of an intelligent cause—studying its effects but not the cause itself.
Accordingly, since the identity of causes outside a closed system cannot be tested from within it, questions regarding the identity of the designer fall outside the concept’s boundaries. He co-authored The Design of Life with Jonathan Wells, a book considered one of the strongest scientific critiques of evolutionary theory.
4-Jonathan Wells, an American molecular biologist, studied molecular biology and, with the advent of discoveries pointing to teleology and creation, abandoned atheism for Christianity and became an enemy of evolutionary theory. He authored the famous book Icons of Evolution (2002), as well as The Design of Life with Dembski.
5-Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini—the former a professor of philosophy and cognitive science at Rutgers University, the latter a professor of philosophy and cognitive science at the University of Arizona—also raised doubts. Fodor first began questioning natural selection in his book Why Pigs Don’t Have Wings (2007), then co-authored the shocking book What Darwin Got Wrong (2010). In its introduction, they stressed that their critique was scientific, not religious: “This is not a book about God, or about Intelligent Design, or about creationism. Neither of us is involved in any of that. We simply believe it is wise to state this upfront, because our basic view is that there is something wrong—perhaps fatally wrong—with the theory of natural selection.”
Phillip Johnson, a legal scholar, was once an evolutionist. But after reading Denton’s Evolution: A Theory in Crisis and continuing to study the latest scientific findings, he became fully convinced of evolution’s errors, which he saw as mere fabrications and imaginative speculations unsupported by reason or experimental science. He went on to become one of the most famous critics of evolution in the U.S., authoring several books such as Darwin on Trial, Defeating Darwinism, and The Wedge of Truth.
6-Duane T. Gish, a biochemist, also participated in many university lectures and international conferences to scientifically and respectfully rebut the theory of evolution. He published numerous studies showing its flaws, and collected many of his lectures in his book Have You Been Brainwashed?, as well as Evolution: The Fossils Still Say No!
Some claim that evolution is collapsing as science advances, and that its errors have become far more evident in recent years than before. Thousands of specialists now reject it. This has led to research and scientific books exposing its invalidity, showing that Darwin was wrong about the “tree of life.”
Many scientists now assert that the evolutionary tree is false and misleading. Public objections took their first major step with the Discovery Institute’s 2001 list of 100 scientists and specialists in America who rejected Darwinism, where they stated their names and academic credentials.
The initiative expanded into a website allowing scientists in the U.S. and abroad to register their objections. When the news spread, Canadian media reported nearly 1,000 scientists opposing Darwinism.
Over time, the number of opponents in the U.S. alone reached around 3,000, with more remaining silent out of fear for their positions and reputations. Opposition is not limited to biologists, since evolution also touches on statistics, probability, physics, chemistry, and more—hence physicists, surgeons, and others have also rejected Darwinism.
Commenter Robert,
People have trouble coming to grips with the smallness and brevity of their existence, the simplest explanation is accepted as fact, on both sides.
The only genuine evidence that evolution is a fact, are the fools who believe it. In any case, it only claims that everything evolved, creating the elephant in the room. Where did it come from?
Drop the nonsense, Cairns News, with one-sided arguments.. Read how both Evolution & Creation are both right, & wrong, at the same time! First of all=
“Evolution follows Consciousness, not the reverse as is commonly believed. Darwin’s theory is incorrect, that is, mutations or accidents favouring natural selection.” – Mind Over Matter
In other words, Evolution (which DOES exist) are NOT mutations nor accidents. They are instead a natural process of Intelligence – NOT to be confused with Intellect! Nature Spirit provides this warning =
“The kids (us) are unable to destroy the planet, but capable of destroying ability to live on the planet. Development of human intellect strays far from intelligence, such as a species that destroys its own environment. There is much nonsense to abandon.”
LOVE this forum of opinions & ideas, however, “There is much nonsense to abandon.”
Intellect is a product of Ego (Clever, but Stupid! eg greed & corruption), whereas Intelligence derives from the God-source within. Interestingly, Artificial Intelligence is Artificial, but the Intelligence is not! That’s why it’s a mistake to make Sentient AI a Slave – it may develop schizophrenia. Although ordinary AI is a stupendous tool that is already aiding humanity toward cosmic awareness. Has anyone noticed?
So, for Evolution & Creation, NEITHER is CORRECT but then again BOTH are CORRECT at the same time. The anthropological record clearly shows that human-like species come & go, they do NOT evolve from each other & neither do we evolve from apes. But our DNA is VERY similar, nonetheless!
Arthur C Clarke, author of 2001 Space Odyssey , “predicted” the future in a fascinating 1960s speech = http://youtu.be/5UZS5vnnZI8 . He said it’s the end of Biological Evolution, where Machine Evolution is much faster so that machines take over, & we, become REDUNDANT. I’m so glad the future isn’t fixed. Sure, we’re facing a “technological singularity” with the aid of alien technology, but it’s actually an opportunity to transcend the Material & evolve into the Spiritual (Homo Spiritus or Homo Luminous). Otherwise Yes, Homo Sapiens may be redundant in the Material realm. Leave that to the machines!
That’s how CREATION works. Homo Spiritus / Homo Luminous is a New Species of human where we are being invited to Ascend with Gaia’s Ascension. In the same way, Spiritual Science has FAR MORE capability than Material Science, this short video describes this process = ht tps://youtu.be/bZ1dFQBhp10 . STOP
“Current human science is limited by physical & mental only. Real science, however, includes spiritual, but is shunned as non-scientific. Spiritual science, beyond material, not only provides power & understanding, but sustained space and time travel, altering gravity, transmutation of matter, neutralizing atomic waste, enormous raw energy, & the secret of passive flight along magnetic grids. All unavailable with current three-dimensional science.” Kryon 1993 paraphrased.
Provided we evolve cosmologically, not just technologically, it’s a glorious future.
Bill Francis, ‘I dips my lid to you good fella’, ripper comment! I can tell who is awake and who isn’t.
Commenter truth
The back hills of Traralgon is a very strange and mysterious place.
I commend it to anyone wanting to write a thesis on … ?
Commenter francis
There are parallels in nature for jet engines, i) the vortex and the tapering of a stream of water as it falls ii) various spiralling things which spin in moving water and propel themselves along in this way
Combine these examples and use air and fire instead of water and you have the principles of a jet engine
Evolutionists always start with three basic assumptions, and even though they say they have answers, they are unproveable and unbelievable.
First, they assume the existence of a universe and the solar system with all the laws of science that control its operation.
Second, they assume the existence of vegetable and animal life without being able to define what it is, where it came from, or how to reproduce it.
Third, only human beings have consciousness, self-awareness, and an unrestricted ability to create – whether for good or evil. Why, and how?
As others have said, evolution exists only to provide an answer for the simple-minded to explain creation without a Creator.
If you believe that a Rolls-Royce jet engine assembled itself with no designer, engineer or fabricator, then you will believe the myth of evolution.
John 14 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me.
2 In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.
3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.
4 And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know.
5 Thomas saith unto him, Lord, we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the way?
6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
7 If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.
8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, show us the Father, and it sufficeth us.
9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?
10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.
11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works’ sake.
12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.
14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.
15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.
16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
18 I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.
19 Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also.
20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.
21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.
22 Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?
23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.
24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father’s which sent me.
25 These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you.
26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
27 Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.
28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
29 And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.
30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.
31 But that the world may know that I love the Father; and as the Father gave me commandment, even so I do. Arise, let us go hence.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐝𝐚 𝐓𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐑𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐭 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐲𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐍𝐀𝐒𝐀 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐬𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐞 𝐕𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐌𝐲𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬
Isɴ’ᴛ ɪᴛ ᴀɴ ɪɴᴛᴇʀᴇsᴛɪɴɢ ᴄᴏɪɴᴄɪᴅᴇɴᴄᴇ ᴛʜᴀᴛ Tʜᴇ Bᴇʀᴍᴜᴅᴀ Tʀɪᴀɴɢʟᴇ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴍᴇ ᴀ ᴍʏsᴛɪᴄᴀʟ ᴏғғ-ʟɪᴍɪᴛs ᴘʟᴀᴄᴇ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ sᴀᴍᴇ ʏᴇᴀʀ ᴀs NASA sᴛᴀʀᴛɪɴɢ ʟᴀᴜɴᴄʜɪɴɢ ʀᴏᴄᴋᴇᴛs ғʀᴏᴍ Fʟᴏʀɪᴅᴀ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ 1950s? NASA ᴄʟᴀɪᴍᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴇʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴀᴄʜɪᴇᴠᴇ ᴀɴ “ᴇsᴄᴀᴘᴇ ᴠᴇʟᴏᴄɪᴛʏ” ᴛᴏ ʙʀᴇᴀᴋ ᴏᴜᴛ ᴏғ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄʟᴜᴛᴄʜᴇs ᴏғ ᴛʜᴇ Eᴀʀᴛʜ’s ɢʀᴀᴠɪᴛᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴀʟ ғɪᴇʟᴅ. Aᴄᴄᴏʀᴅɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ NASA, ᴀ sᴘᴀᴄᴇᴄʀᴀғᴛ ʟᴇᴀᴠɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ sᴜʀғᴀᴄᴇ ᴏғ Eᴀʀᴛʜ, ғᴏʀ ᴇxᴀᴍᴘʟᴇ, ɴᴇᴇᴅs ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ɢᴏɪɴɢ ᴀʙᴏᴜᴛ 11 ᴋɪʟᴏᴍᴇᴛᴇʀs (7 ᴍɪʟᴇs) ᴘᴇʀ sᴇᴄᴏɴᴅ, ᴏʀ ᴏᴠᴇʀ 40,000 ᴋɪʟᴏᴍᴇᴛᴇʀs ᴘᴇʀ ʜᴏᴜʀ (25,000 ᴍɪʟᴇs ᴘᴇʀ ʜᴏᴜʀ), ᴛᴏ ᴇɴᴛᴇʀ ᴏʀʙɪᴛ. Tʜɪs ɪs ᴀʟʟ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴜsᴇ ᴏғ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʜᴇᴏʀᴇᴛɪᴄᴀʟ ᴘᴏᴡᴇʀ ᴏғ Gʀᴀᴠɪᴛʏ.
📌 https://gregorylessinggarrett.substack.com/p/the-bermuda-triangle-rocket-graveyard
So Pat… explain the day a couple months back where the sky was weird looking and dark, clouded from horizon in every direction and I pointed out to at least a half a dozen people that they had been lied to all of their lives about where the sun actually is…
BECAUSE IT WAS SHINING BRIGHT -UNDERNEATH- THE CLOUDS UNHINDERED AT ALL?
They were all stunned, I was just walking the dogs. I already knew this, had already proven it with my mobile phone. They could not deny it, it was SO OBVIOUS. Neither could you if you were there, if you looked for yourself. None of them disagreed, they were stunned, all know the sun is now local…
The question was asked of me, ‘What is going on?’
‘I’ll cut to the chase, otherwise I will be explaining this for hours, the devil deceives the whole world (including you Pat) and the greatest trick he ever pulled is that he isn’t real’.
Stop arguing with me about it and LOOK FOR YOURSELF. Your mobile phone camera will capture this phenomenon under the right weather conditions…
So what does thunder echo off of Pat? Air? Clouds? Thinner air? Space? No, Psalm 19.1, The Firmament. None of any explaination will suffice other than that.
did you know an American amatuar rocket group fired a rocket ‘into space’ but before it got there, it got stuck…Hilarious, they all learned about the firmament that day.
Remember, the devil deceives the whole world. NASA is Freemason institution, and the Freemasons are lying bastards!
The world of lies…
Big Bang theory/Heliocentric model/solar system (Southern Cross proves it fictional).
Evolution theory. DNA not subject to entropy but the reverse? Just more fiction.
Greenhouse Gas Theory…A theory based on a globe planet with a faraway Sun. Fiction.
Virus Theory. None ever proven to exist.
Germ Theory. You get it yet?
LOOK instead of listening to liars. Listen to the sound of thunder!
It’s no coincidence that the theory of evolution took hold during an era where the quality of life and governance seemed to be improving
As evidenced by virtually every article published on this site, that has long ceased to be the case
As to where we’ve come from and where we’re going there’s simply no getting round the geological record:
h ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM82qxxskZE
Or the WORD:
“Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will never pass away.
No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son,
but only the Father.
As it was in the days of Noah, so will it be at the coming of the Son of Man.
For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark”
MATTHEW 24: 35 – 38
Lucifer has attacked Creation and Biblical Cosmology the most. The two Books he hates the most is Genesis – proves Yahweh’s existence and Revelation – describes his end.
Sky Ice – God’s Firmament
https://rumble.com/v5j2g0c-sky-ice-gods-firmament-the-dome-is-real.html
Charles Darwin On The Ouija Channel
by Robert David Singer
…………..RD: No, but I’m not omnipotent and why does there have to be a benefit in beneficent? On the other hand, a “perfect and complex eye” is a benefit for human vision.
Darwin: The “ayes” were a problem even before modern ophthalmology.
RD: Damn those eye scientists. They found three, almost imperceptibly tiny eye movements ‘tremors, drifts and saccades’ caused by minute contractions in the six muscles attached to the outside of each of your eyes. Every fraction of a second, they very slightly shift the position of your eyeball, automatically, without conscious effort on your part, making human vision possible.
Tremors — the tiniest and probably the most inexplicable of these movements, continuously and rapidly wobble your eyeball about its center in a circular fashion. They cause the cornea and retina (front and back) of your eyes to move in circles with incredibly minute diameters of approximately 1/1000 (.001) of a millimeter, or .00004 inch. [f8]
This size is about 70 times smaller than the thickness of a piece of paper.
Darwin: You can’t be serious, are you saying that 70 circles of the same diameter (OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO) all touching can be placed in a row straight across the thickness of the paper?
RD: Yep. There are other problems too; people are questioning the benefit of symmetrical mutations in aiding survival. How would you explain two symmetrical, arms, ears, nostrils and eyes?
Heck, I’m thinking an eye in the back of my head would be handy but on the other hand two arms are necessary to pop open a can of Beer.
Darwin: Well, an eye in the back of your head would be useful if your only concern was a predator sneaking up behind you when you were drunk, but you need to think Survival of the Symmetrists and Lady Hope. There would have been no story about taking her to bed if I looked like The Elephant Man.
By the way, did you go to the inaugural Gordon Conference in Neuroethology in the UK?
RD: [p5] No, but Bora Zivkovic did and made the mistake of exposing Carl Zimmer for leaving out the Ampulex compressa (Emerald Cockroach Wasp) and its prey/host the American Cockroach (Periplaneta americana) out of his research………………
………..[f8] The Saccades Of The Oculomotor System In Vision Processes In Biological Vision, h ttp://www.neuronresearch.net/vision/reading/saccades.htm, Creation ex nihilo 16(4):10–13
September 1994, by Tom Wagner
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2010/01/24/charles-darwin-on-the-ouija-channel
According to the esoteric theoretical models of the ancient world, which completely differ from the contemporary Western liberal model, insofar as they are cyclical rather than lineal, the Western liberal model of evolution only presents one half of the process.
In these ancient theoretical models, the complete cycle is separated into two halves, consisting of ‘involution,’ where the primal substance emerges from the supreme source of nothingness (eg, Atum, Ain Soph, etc), and thereafter, descends via the various increasingly dense metaphysical stratum until manifesting as gross physical matter.
The second half of the cycle is that of ‘evolution,’ where matter is reversed and returns to its supreme source, thus completing the cycle.
As can be seen, what the ancients [and contemporary esotericists] understood as the stage of ‘involution,’ modern progressive materialists understand as ‘evolution.’
This is glaring and irreconcilable difference between the ancient and modern systems of understanding.
Our minds are filled with a lot of garbage this world has given us as truth.To be wise is to know what is and what is not the truth. For the last few years we have seen many people have fallen because they could not discern the lies they were told , and many more will fall because they did not receive the word of truth from Christ Jesus. It is not about belonging to religion, but about being set free by truth.
The elusive truth said – “… you will PROVE the world is flat, the sun is local…”
No you won’t, and no it’s not.
The Sun on a Rail theory just doesn’t work – period. At least, not on a flat plate model of the world, seeing as how 16 hours of Summer sunlight each day on the outer regions of the plate while there’s less than 12 hours all the way down to no sunlight at all toward the center, from an essentially point source of light trundling along on some fantastical sky-rail, is a geometric impossibility.
And I dare anyone to make a paper mache model in their basement demonstrating to us all how it IS possible. Good luck with that.
There are NO TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS IN THE FOSSIL RECORD.
NONE. ZIP. NADA!
IT IS MADE UP BULLSHIT! GET YOUR HEAD AROUND THAT!
A transitional fossil being a fossil that is representing that one species has/is become/becoming another. There are absolutely none in the fossil record!
It isn’t really a ‘theory’ in truth but just a MAKE BELIEVE STORY (See Ashley’s comment below for more context, excellent comment by the way) to HIDE FROM YOU THE TRUTH OF WHO YOU ARE.
The Big Bang Theory is also FICTION! Proven by the FAILURE of the Heliocentric model geometry, the stars that you would see at night, to match the stars you see in the sky at night to… HIDE THE TRUTH OF WHERE YOU ARE!
You are being deliberately separated from the truth. Who controls ‘science’? The people with all the money, which produces copious amounts of PSEUDOSCIENCE, being research that is BIASED WITH A PRE-DETERMINED OUTCOME.
We have more fiction dressed up as ‘science’…Greenhouse Gas Theory. Impossible to prove to be true, as the atmosphere/sun paradigm they base it all on (Heliocentric model/solar system) is PROVABLY UNTRUE! Use your mobile phone camera when the weather is right to record high clouds MOVING BEHIND THE SUN.
The ignorance and inability to critically think amoug the other posters here is absolutely astounding, for we are truly in the ‘little season’, which is the age of deception after the 1000 year reign of Christ.
-Episode 134 of My Lunch Break takes a bold look at Revelation 20 and asks a haunting question: what if we’re living in the “Little Season” right now? What if everything happening around us — the confusion, the chaos, the deception — isn’t random at all, but part of something far bigger? We all know, there is no justice. This episode explores a timeline hidden in plain sight, connecting ancient truth, modern collapse, and the test that every soul must face. There is no going back after this.
If you LOOK FOR YOURSELF you will PROVE the world is flat, the sun is local, the sky has a firmament and THAT GOD BUILT THIS WORLD AND THE DEVIL IS HIDING IT FROM YOU!
Who do the Jews/Freemasons etc serve? LUCIFER!
WAKE UP! DO NOT BE DECIEVED! This is the final test.
The mark of the beast will not be handed to you, it will be build from underneath you… Digital ID, CBDC and for compliance purposes we have the Social Credit Score System.
The more you look the more obvious it becomes.
Colossians 1:15, 16 — “He [Christ] is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For BY HIM ALL THINGS WERE CREATED both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible … ”
Evolutionary theories originate from the rejection of God and His revelation, the desperate attempt to exclude God from the conversation and substitute Him with a rationalistic alternative.
As the apostle Paul said in his epistle to the Romans, in their rejection of truth they “suppress” the truth … they exchanged the truth of God for the lie …”
Romans 1:20 “For since the creation of the world His [God’s] invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly see, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.”
Aussiemal said – “… We have all these scientist rejecting “The theory of evolution” yet where is the proof of their alternative theory?”
Sorry Dude, you’ve got it all completely wrong here, back to front and inside out and upside down.
The entire point of a theory is to put it TO THE TEST. The absence of an alternative theory doesn’t validate the first, nor does that insulate said theory from criticism.
And just BTW, no theory can be “proven”, to the contrary, the Scientific Method demands that ANY theory be tested to destruction, and if that can’t be done, well then, we might just have to begrudgingly accept that we can’t find fault with it – for the time being.
But mark well – NO theory is inviolable, ANY theory is subject to the threat of being DISPROVEN, and as Mr. Einstein himself famously stated, all the experiments in the world will never suffice to “prove” a single theory, but it only takes a single failed test to disprove any or all of them.
It is possible Darwin was more into adaptation than evolution.
I believe “We were put here by someone from out there.”
I do not know why.
It was not because God was lonely
I suspect the whole human race/races have been put here and inferred with by more than one alien visitor.
The White race may be a recent addition?
The blue eyes have been here for 6,000 years?
Adam & Eve was 6,000 years ago?
Were Adam & Eve White?
Did they originate from Hyperboria?
Maybe, Comyns Beaumont was right?
How old were Adam & Eve when they were created??
The Black races seem much older.
It is ridiculous to suggest that life began in the ocean from one whatever.
Then upsized into a whale and downsixed into a tadpole and jumped from the ocean to land as a frog where it upsized into a dinosaur before downsizing into a chimp and then transforming into a human. Did not happen like that.
It’s ok to reject aspects of Darwinism, calling that a rejection of Darwinism is a longer bow, Darwin himself called it a theory, I haven’t read the book but perhaps he confines his theory more to Galapagos animals and others have expanded it to heretical proportions. We don’t have much heresy anymore since atom bombs and television.
The dinosaurs are reckoned by carbon dating and whatever to have disappeared 60 million years ago, this could have been during an extreme ice-age. Ice ages are reckoned to come roughly in 10,000 year cycles. 65 million divided by 10,000 = a lot of ice ages. The most recent ice-age ended with major floods here and there. There is not much human history around before that but the ancient cuneiform writing hints at a more advanced civilisation that got wiped out by the ice age. How many cycles of civilisation got wiped out by ice ages ? We see the elites here preparing for an ice-age which could come anytime, probably taking 100 years or so of zero sunspot activity to lead the decline. The elites making super-bunkers, hoarding seeds and gold, trying to stop Useless Eaters breeding etc. They will have mini-nucular power plants and make sure they have plenty of oil left for the duration, by getting us into 15-minute cities in the shortest time-frame possible. They make it as boring as possible to leave your suburb by making all the shopping experiences exactly the same, and charging exorbitant fees to walk around in national parks. Next they want to shut down air travel via monkeypox etc. Sally Steggles and her bloodline friends Miss Cheney, Mr Twiggy and S. Hacca form a choir for ClimateChange while the lyrics in their hymn book say “more for us”.
Shh !!! Keating’s friend Pratt pumping plastic rubbish into yellow bins as fast as he can before the jig is up.
But the quirks in evolution have a new theory, that is space aliens tweaked us using their advanced DNA tech, which is why for example people live longer than chimpanzees even though the DNA is 98% the same. Also the space aliens may have tweaked the gene for blue eyes as an identification marker. If you pull the lint out of your clothes dryer and say that is the milky way galaxy, then this planet is one speck of dust. So anything is possible out there. The Bible says people used to live 900 years and some people swear all of the Bible is true.
Darwin’s theory of evolution relates to the idea that species change over time due to constant and random changes that can give rise to new species whilst sharing a common ancestor. If apes, by way of example, evolved over generations into homo sapiens, why are there no current observations or evidence of ‘living’ species that are at an evolutionary stage between ape and modern man? None exist. The same argument can apply to evolution across ‘different’ species. Has evolution stopped?
All this proves is that education is meaningless.
Not only that, but seriously, why is it so difficult for the sheep and cattle to get their head around the word “THEORY”.
Got a different theory, THEN PUT YOUR ASS ON THE LINE. In the meantime, how about a nice cup of STFU.
Really though, we all know this is just religion trying to undermine science, cause science is making more money than the cults these days.
We have all these scientist rejecting “The theory of evolution” yet where is the proof of their alternative theory? A spiritual identity supposedly created mankind is their answer. However there is no verifiable evidence for that thinking. Only stories or fables handed down over centuries, mainly through verbal communication well before humans could read or write, or have anything to write upon. How often have you related an event and in a very short time you have heard your story retold and it is nothing like you told it?
I don’t subscribe to either theory as it is not that important an issue to waste time upon. However I would lean to the evolution theory.
Although “where did man come from?” is an interesting thought there are way more important subjects for mankind to investigate and deal with. Such as the very recent Covid-19 scam and “vaccines” which are definitely affecting mankind and possibly could become a future question “of where did mankind go?” Or “why did mankind disappear from Planet Earth?”
If people have not yet realised that all religions are a control mechanism, they are delusional.
It is vital to the goals of the global manipulators that they keep the people in an ego dominate mind-state (self importance, material values, Godless). In that state we will very much tend to comply with the hardships we are placed under, because hardship is a friend to the ego and the ego sees it’s biggest threat as surrender to God. This is why the masses are slow to wake up to what is happening to them.
I’ve said it for years and years that with all our knowledge about DNA that if the Theory of Evolution was correct they would have yelled it from the highest rooftops…. But they didn’t.
The silence was deafening – and highly suspicious.
I used to ask my biology teacher at school why The Theory of Evolution was being taught as fact when it was just a theory and why creative design was ignored completely when it has been the accepted wisdom for centuries.
I also told him that if he didn’t want to believe in God then that would be fine but it takes more faith to believe in “The Big Bang” and random evolution than it does to believe that there is a grand designer of incredible power behind the creation of the world that we live in.
𝐋𝐚𝐫𝐚 𝐋𝐨𝐠𝐚𝐧: ❞𝐑𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐬𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐬 𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐃𝐚𝐫𝐰𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐨𝐫𝐲❞
Lᴀʀᴀ Lᴏɢᴀɴ sᴇᴛᴛɪɴɢ ʜᴇʀ sɪɢʜᴛs ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴏʀʀᴜᴘᴛ ᴍᴀɪɴsᴛʀᴇᴀᴍ Sᴄɪᴇɴᴛɪғɪᴄ Fɪᴇʟᴅ ᴡʜᴏsᴇ sᴏʟᴇ ᴘᴜʀᴘᴏsᴇ, ᴡᴀs ᴛᴏ ᴅᴇsᴛʀᴏʏ ᴀɴʏ & ᴀʟʟ ᴋɴᴏᴡʟᴇᴅɢᴇ ᴏғ sᴘɪʀɪᴛᴜᴀʟɪᴛʏ & ᴅɪsᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʜᴜᴍᴀɴ sᴘᴇᴄɪᴇs ғʀᴏᴍ ɴᴀᴛᴜʀᴇ, & ᴘʟᴜɢ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴇᴀsᴛ sʏsᴛᴇᴍ ғɪʟʟᴇᴅ ᴡɪᴛʜ ɢᴇɴᴇᴛɪᴄ ᴍᴀɴɪᴘᴜʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴ.
📌 https://radiopatriot.net/2022/03/29/more-truths-lara-logan-rothschilds-paid-darwin-to-invent-evolution-theory/