Alleged 26 y.o. pre-school abuser in Melbourne educated by state school and Catholic curriculum

When the Labor, Green national education curriculum allows pre-school and daycare kids to be entertained by drag queens and teaches them they need sex partners at five years old there is a hidden agenda that the legacy media would never expose and about which parents have little idea.

The shocking allegations made against a male pre-school teacher in Victoria who could have molested hundreds of very young children at pre-schools has woken up parents that something is radically wrong with the education system, which in effect is no different to that of crooked Joe Biden’s DEI or that of woke Britain with a homosexual Prime Minister and New Zealand’s Jacinda (Jack) Adern.

How could three countries get it so wrong? How could this happen? In Australia, the state of Victoria is the outstanding leader of humanism and perversion in education going back a few decades under Labor rule. However this misaligned moral compass of Labor and now Greens has now seeped into every state.

The teacher alleged to have interfered with these children is himself a product of modern socialist Labor and Greens humanist education which has allowed perverse sexual policies into most state and Catholic schools.

It would be hard to allot this behaviour entirely to the Victorian perpetrator who was almost certainly indoctrinated under Victoria’s modern, socialist, woke education agenda while at school.

The offender was educated in a Catholic high school but it is unknown whether he attended a state or Catholic primary school and reports in The Age indicate he was gay.

Indeed the alleged offender is only 26 years old. Well done Labor.

While Karl Marx in his 1848 Communist Manifesto, which is the genesis of Labor and Green policies today, did not expressly deal with sexuality instead it provides for the state to manage the education of children from a young age.

Communist Manifesto Section 18

(viii) Education of all children, from the moment they can leave their mother’s care, in national establishments at national cost. Education and production together.

What will be the influence of communist society on the family?
It will transform the relations between the sexes into a purely private matter which concerns only
the persons involved and into which society has no occasion to intervene. It can do this since it
does away with private property and educates children on a communal basis, and in this way
removes the two bases of traditional marriage – the dependence rooted in private property, of the
women on the man, and of the children on the parents.
And here is the answer to the outcry of the highly moral philistines against the “community of
women”. Community of women is a condition which belongs entirely to bourgeois society and
which today finds its complete expression in prostitution. But prostitution is based on private
property and falls with it. Thus, communist society, instead of introducing community of women,
in fact abolishes it.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf

In Australia, although prevalent in education, there is never any mention of the occult in any inquiries, studies or reports by mainstream media or government which carry on as if such a practice has never existed.

A current example of black magic and occult can be found in J.K. Rowling’s books of witchcraft, widely read in schools under the Harry Potter title. Some readers have questioned if Harry Potter is gay.

The Harry Potter series has faced challenges and bans due to concerns about its themes of magic and the occult. While some see the books as a gateway to literature and a source of valuable life lessons, others are concerned about their potential impact on children’s beliefs and behavior.

Rowling has faced significant controversy, primarily due to her views on transgender issues and gender identity. These views have led to accusations of transphobia and sparked debates about freedom of speech and cancel culture.

From Cairns News research we discovered there are high profile Australian and New Zealand politicians who have been compromised by Mossad, MI6 and the CIA’s under-age honey traps and child trafficking.

All of these people are pedophiles. It is the height of absolute hypocrisy for Labor, Greens and Liberals to scream in horror about the daycare abuse.

Now the woke political class are calling for male teachers to be banned from pre-schools! It is their education policies starting 30 or more years ago which have caused the problem.

A 1983 daycare abuse case in California has parallels to the present, alleged pre-school crimes just uncovered in Australia.

McMartin pre-school case Los Angeles 1983 – A&E True Crime

In the 1980s, allegations of ritualized child sexual abuse were made against multiple preschool and daycare workers across the United States. In the McMartin preschool case (1983-90), hundreds of children at the school, located in Manhattan Beach, California, close to Los Angeles, described being abused, at times during Satanic rites, in response to suggestive questions.

In August 1983, Judy Johnson told police in Manhattan Beach, California, that doctors believed her 2-year-old son had been sodomized. According to Johnson, her son had said “Mister Ray” was responsible. Ray Buckey was part of the staff at the Virginia McMartin preschool, which Johnson’s son attended.

Buckey was arrested on September 7, 1983. The following day, Manhattan Beach police sent 200 letters to families of McMartin students. The letter mentioned child molestation and directed parents to, “Please question your child to see if he or she has been a witness to any crime or if he or she has been a victim.”

Ray Buckey was named in the letter. Susan Moran, a criminal defense attorney and professor at Case Western University’s School of Law, tells A&E True Crime, “When you send a letter out like that, naming the alleged individual, you’ve already tainted that investigation.” Moran adds, “These parents are ill-equipped with the proper questioning methods, and you’re now going to have corrupt responses.”

After this letter was sent out, hundreds of former or current McMartin students went to Children’s Institute International (CII), a Los Angeles children’s therapy center. Social worker Kee MacFarlane did most of the interviews with these children.

It was later determined that during the CII interviews, which were videotaped, children were asked leading questions, such as “Can you remember the naked pictures?” They were told that other kids had already shared “yucky” secrets, so they needed to speak up. A child who denied abuse was called a “scaredy cat.”

Children ended up talking about playing games like “Naked Movie Star,” or being abused in tunnels under the school. They also stated they’d visited local businesses and been assaulted there. In some accounts, they said their teachers had killed rabbits and turtles to intimidate them.

Testimony from the young students also ended up linking the case to growing nationwide fears about Satanism. A child talked of a baby being sacrificed in a church. Another student said he’d been taken to a graveyard, where he helped unearth a coffin and saw a body that was then cut with knives. Interviews also mentioned the preschool teachers flying in the air while dressed as witches.

Details about the CII interviews were broadcast on a local station in February 1984. This sparked intense interest that would last for the duration of the case.

The McMartin Trial Begins

CII eventually interviewed 400 students and concluded that about 360 children had been abused. Six McMartin teachers were alleged to have been involved. In addition to Ray Buckey, his mother, Peggy McMartin Buckey, and his sister, Peggy Ann Buckey, three female teachers were also accused. CII staff believed the teachers were running a pornography ring, a claim prosecutors would adopt as well.

Parents and other advocates were determined to “believe the children“—which became their slogan—even when evidence didn’t back up their claims. Investigators did not find tunnels under the preschool, or bones from slaughtered animals. The FBI and Interpol could not locate any traces of pornography that the defendants had allegedly been making.

However, a task force to assist Manhattan Beach police was only formed eight months into the investigation. Some skeptics thought enough time had elapsed that potential evidence might have been destroyed.

In March 1984, a Los Angeles County grand jury handed down indictments against Ray Buckey, his mother and sister, and the three other teachers. The grand jury also indicted 76-year-old Virginia McMartin, founder of the preschool and Buckey’s grandmother—though prosecutors had not asked for her to be charged.

A preliminary hearing began for the seven defendants in April 1984 on a total of 208 counts of sexual abuse and conspiracy. The group, dubbed the “McMartin Seven” by some news outlets, were ordered to trial in January 1986. A week later, a new district attorney cited “incredibly weak evidence” and dropped charges against everyone except Ray Buckey and his mother.

Judy Johnson, who’d gone to the police in August 1983 with the claim her child was sodomized at the school and who put in motion the school’s investigation, was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia in 1985. Defense counsel was not made aware of this. Johnson died in December 1986 from alcohol-related liver disease.

The trial of Buckey and McMartin Buckey began in April 1987. On January 18, 1990, they were found not guilty on 52 counts. The jury deadlocked on 12 molestation charges against Buckey and one count of conspiracy against both Buckey and McMartin Buckey and the judge declared a mistrial. The judge then dismissed the one conspiracy charge faced by McMartin Buckey but facing parental pressure, prosecutors opted to try Buckey again later on eight of the deadlocked counts. The second trial ended on July 27,1990 with another deadlocked jury. Soon afterward, the prosecutor said Buckey would not be tried again.

The investigations and trials had taken seven years and cost more than $15 million. It was, and currently remains, the longest and most expensive criminal trial in American history.

The Aftermath of the McMartin Case

In addition to the McMartin case, other preschool and daycare workers in the U.S. were accused of sexually abusing children in the 1980s. Many of the allegations included charges of ritualized abuse amid Satanic practices.

One staff member from a different school near McMartin was tried, but the case ended with a hung jury. Other daycare workers faced charges in New Jersey and North Carolina. Any convictions were eventually overturned.

Many parents of McMartin students remained convinced their children had been abused. In 1990, some hired an archaeologist to look for tunnels beneath the preschool, since tunnels had been mentioned by some children as a place where some abuse took place. A report issued by the archaeologist in 1993 stated the tunnels existed. However, another expert reviewed this report and concluded the tunnels were actually trash pits from years past.

Lindsay Malloy, a professor of forensic psychology at Ontario Tech University tells A&E True Crime, “A lot of these accounts were quite compelling and the children were providing details. If you saw your kid testifying, or claiming that these things happened, it would be really hard to get past that.”

A McMartin student, Kyle Zirpolo, spoke out in 2005 saying he had lied about being abused. He explained his confession had resulted from the pressures he’d experienced in interviews. “There were so many kids saying all these things happened that you didn’t want to be the one who said nothing did,” he said. He also acknowledged his mother was still convinced abuse had taken place.

Though he was eventually freed, Ray Buckey spent five years in prison before being released on bail. His mother spent nearly two years in prison.

The techniques used to interview McMartin students have been studied and analyzed, leading to insights about the best way to interview children.

Malloy says, “We have a lot more awareness now about suggestibility, and about the fact that you have to be very careful when you are collecting memory evidence, especially from vulnerable populations like kids.”

-Contributed